i cant even understand what is this why if arjun can defeat karna in 2 minutes then why did he kill karna like a coward and how did karna defeat arjun on 16th day this is undoubtfully a great creation with few mistakes in it
@skshivanand8 : Ego with 99 Strong emotions are destructive forces . These are much stronger than wisdom . Karna was much stronger than Arjuna . Check for your self . There are many occassions , when , you would have made a decision against your wisdom , falling prey to your own emotions.When it comes to lawfull thinking , let the ways of defeating ur emotions be wrong , doesn't matter , but Law/Dharma should be our foremost goal. This is implicated
Bhishma tells Arjun not to forgive Jayadratha. By what logic is Jayadratha most responsible for Abhimanyu's death? Was he supposed to stand aside and let everyone enter the Chakravyuh?
@metterklume, Jayadratha was responsible because going by their rules one warrior was to fight with one only. He knew there were 7 warriors inside chakravyuh's centre and yet did not let any one else accompany Abhimanyu. Judge them by their own rules they set and not by today's "pragmatic behaviour" we would follow.
A lot of people blame Dhitrashtra only for the war. It is true that he is the one to blame primarily for the war. But a lot of people were to blame. Don't forget that Time says that if it were in his power to stop the war, he would have told Bhishma to not make the vow at Satyavati's home. Also, Dhitrashtra's mother is to blame also because of the way she acted in front of Vyas. Satyavati is also to blame b/c of her high ambitions.
@sahil3486 when I posted the comment it was a joke...can't believe people took it seriously and replied...but thanks for ur opinion...I wldnt compare a factual human being with mythical stories...I'm Hindu and respect the religion but even I know the mahabharat and ramayan are simply stories to portray the way humans should behave to portray the difference of right and wrong...
dhritrashtra is such a coward....his solutions are most hilarious...agni ko prathna karunga ke woh pragat hi na ho toh arjun bhi bach jayega aur jaydrata bhi.... ...lol....wat a loser......Reallly ?!!
dude get some objectivity in life .... idiot...;)
though it when vidur, sanjay n even gandhari give it back to him n he goes like "dont burst my bubble"
think at some level he reminds me of britney spears...
@ajayjeev I agree with your interpretation. But I must ask you. Who do you think is more powerful, Arjun or Bruce Lee? I know a hand to hand fight wouldn't be fair as Bruce would be far superior due to his inhuman speed and striking power. However, if Arjun was allowed to use a sword against Bruce's thin cane he uses in Game of Death??
@1RONLUNG999 A normal soldier of mahabarat could defeat bruce lee I am a big fan of bruce lee but truth is truth See 5000 old aryan martial art by russian master.
Arjuna valour has to praised as he is determined that he is willing to do anything to kill the killer of his son. Infact he single handedly destroys 2 Akshaukunis on his own and Kauravas are trapped. If Lord Krishna did not provide confidence the Pandavas could not have won. Lord Krishna called the shots and Arjuna executed it to perfection. Of course, as a human being he had flaws and had his ego...but the way he was so focussed in his tasks are worth of adoration and respect.
The one thing I just do not understand about Mahabharat is this:
How did Arjun defeat all opponent leading warriors in the war of Virat single handedly, but in this Dharma war even with the help of Bhima and Krishna, Arjun took this long?!?!? And that to he had to by using deceit???
@tycoonpratik During the Virat Arjun was able to use his Divyastra, however for this war, he promised not to use any Divyastra, so that the future doesnt remember him as some1 who just used supreme power and spiritual weapons to defeat everyone, however fought everyone with the similar level of astra as them, to defeat them.
Blaming Jayadrath is all very well, but what this cleverly disguises is Arjun's own incompetence. An unheard-of warrior like Susharma is able to hold Arjun at bay for two whole days, even with Lord Krishna & Shri Hanuman protecting him!
Even after the Mahabharata war, when Yudhistir did the Ashwamedha yagna, Arjun gets into a fight with his own son Babruvahana, who ends up killing Arjuna as soon as he begins to fight seriously (albeit unwillingly)! Arjuna is then restored to life by Uloopi.
@Shaun:19475: I certainly agree with you that this epic is to teach us to lead our lives for the sake of "dharma" and set ourselves in "truth". History is not to fret over but is to learn to make our present better. Also, every story in this epic has sidelined story. There is no need to feel bad that why all this happened but there is a need to know that every action always has a reaction or result.
@ra1njita Dear, nothing not any story of this epic sidelined any inch. It only high-lighted every possible human emosions to the depth ! And such emotions ever happens till the end are high-lighted in the best ways possibles ways and this Epic is a teach for that.. ! if the humanstake it or don't take it, it is the preach of hights, if anyone accepts or doesn't ! It is Shri Krishna who accompained this truth and none other !
Dear Blessed Soul, Please listen to Yatharth Geeta OR Bhagavad Gita, never has Bhagavad Gita been explained so clearly and in so much in depth. It is hence called "Yatharthgeeta, you can download the mp3 of your choice of language from the website yatharthgeeta. com OR search for 'yatharthgeeta' right here on youtube OR go to youtube. com/user/foryatharthgeeta to get a quick preview. God Bless You!
मुझे यह नहीं समझ आता कि अर्जुन सब को सिर्फ घायल ही क्यों करता है? अवसर मिलाने पर शत्रु को मार ही देना चाहिए था. यदि अभिमन्यु ने भी यही किया होता तो शायद वह वीरगति को प्राप्त नहीं होता.
@kbkushalutube are mere bhai. ye yuddh to 18 din chala tha or is serial me sab ku6 upar upar se dikhaya he detail me nahi. to 1 din me 7 logo ko raste me se yuddh kar k hatana koi mamuli baat thodi he.wikipedia me jakar sirf sena ki size dekhna tab andaja ayega ki tab ki sena kesi or kitni badi hua karti thi.
we r the best religion wise.well I as Hindu can say so.Not bcos in saying so I say something worth saying but bcos I m a Hindu. Any other Ali or George should feel the same about their religion as well. Main point is no religion is small or big.religions are like rivers which finally meets the ALL MIGHTY sea.Our world is meant for peace and brotherhood and this series emphasizes on that very aspect.lets loved and be loved.
@ravishankarpandey You are right there. But that does not mean I should not say that I like Shri Ram and SHri Krishna and their teaching bcause I am not Hindu. that is why I think shanti should be the religion margadarshan chahe koi bhi ho.
Jaidrath had boon that, for one day he will be able to defeat all Pandavas. He intentionally choose this day, so he was accountable, otherwise all Panadavas were with Abhimanyu.....
what?? jaidrath was just doing as he was instructed... isolating abhi was not unethical by any means... it was the killing of abhi by 7 warriors together when he was unarmed - that was unethical. if anyone should be forgiven it is jaidrath - instead of holding him accountable for the dubious morals of the other 7.
get em arjun! i love arjun's acting he is soo good....and this war would've never existed if it wasnt for Dhitrashtra..i think he is the one to be blamed for everything.
interestingly, feroz sarfaraaz khan had to use an alias 'arjun' while playing same role. perhaps it was to obviate unwarranted comments by "not -yet -so -cosmopolitan" audience in 80s
Will you idiots stop comparing science and religion..it is like comparing you lamers with a pig...and complaining to you that your way of behaviour is no tlike the pig..obviously it wouldn't be..see guys if you dont have belief just keep it to yourself..Dont spoil our belief and start a war in place where name of god resides..Krishna was correct Kali yuga stinks with atheists and other un neurulated idiots. If you see it as stone it is a stone. If you see it as god it is god. We see it as God!
Instead of dismissing the story of Mahabharat as Fiction, one should uncover and research more about the ancient times. Homer's troy was a fiction till the real Troy was uncovered which proved that all Myths have some kind of Reality in them.
My assumption is that the Ancient people considered Aliens to be Gods. Also, the races mentioned in Mahabharat like Gandharva, Yaksha, Rakshas seemed more like Foreign Tribes or Races unknown to Vedic Indians. Well, that's just my theory.
Troy is a story and it didn't even happen in india. Assuming you as indian i say try to see what Brass can be bended from your nation and culture rather than other cultures which teach you how to steal gold from one nation and become wealthy. Comparing troy brings out theories in you..try comparing the mahabharatha it will bring out the truth in you which can be proved Science tell us about B.C and A.c our culture speaks of yugas. i yuga equals 1,728,000 human years..so quit comparing
why the hell does Karna keep thinking that he is better than Arjun?? at Draupadi's swayamwar, when Arjun was disguised as a Brahmin and he won, Karna alerted him and Arjun's arrows damaged Karna's bows.....and then, in the Virat war, Arjun defeated all the warriors from Hastinapur, including Karna....and now, Arjun defeats Karna again while seeking Jaydrath....why does Karna keep thinking he's the best??
because its every character is like of fiction stories.starting from bhisma himself. her mother is ganga a river how can be this. if it is symbolic name ok i agree but we see she always appears whenever he want to meet. he got icha murtyu vardan it is not practical and not possible.
Well first of all we need to know if you believe in god. If you do not then i can agree that it is fiction for you but if you do believe in god you cannot say it is fiction. If you believe in god then everything is possible.
in social science anlysis are always biased and to be objective is really hard, you have to make certain assumptions.., and you also have to think where this knowledge comes from..people at this time cannot come with such a wisdom as the bhagvat geeta. I admit i dont know the geeta in all aspects, just a little.. but what is your problem why do you think it is fiction?
When i analyse it honestly i do not find any fiction.If for you it is fiction then you have to agree that the one who wrote this story had a more than fabulous imagination. He should have been a genious.
@kmustg hey mate, dwarika nagri where lord krishna lived is still der in india under the sea. it was found just before 18 years. so it is not fiction my frnd.
@kmustg - it is not a fiction. But a tale told by a lot of people over the time. They kept adding whatever they experienced at the time. Devrath (Pitamah) is described to go to ganga tat to meet his mom - possible she was cremated there or she lived there. He felt like he was talking to her. About ichha mrutyu, I think the medicine was quite advance during the period and a few like Bhishma could afford it. Some say he might be half alien.
Because of all these rules in war that Indian ruler were later on fucked by muslim invaders in battlefields. There should be only one goal in war and that is to win.
you idiot...i can show you a video made by me..in which it is shown that i was the old king of all races and people...master of the universe...would you believe?
Ha, ha. What a bollywood style acting? B.R.Chopra is a moron. He has changed the story. Bhisma telling Arjuna not to forgive Jaydrath. This never happens. Also, Arjuna, a great warrior is shown like a sissy, crying over his son's death like a child. Why do these morons not read the original story written by Veda Vyasa?
The story has indeed been tampered a bit but there are lots of episodes that indicate that they have read the original epic in detail. The mass is not mature enough to hear everthing and hence they have only focussed on the essence instead of controversies. Even if it is a small mistake we shld not highlight it, respecting the tremendous effort in getting the great work to the general mass..who would otherwise not make an effort themselves to read it.
BRC and his team have done a good job in bringing this to the masses. It must have involved massive amounts of efforts from lots of people. We are very thankful for that.
But that is no reason to positively criticize. Mahabharata had lots and lots of subtleties. Considering them can indeed teach us much more.
But careless dialogs can wrongly twist the interpretation of the story.
You can post the subtleties as supplements, here, so that we can all relish it. As for people like BRC or Sagar, their responsiblities are huge. Most people out there are ready to fight at every little chance thrown to them..instead of trying to enjoy. But I know what you mean..... especially the new serials like Jai Sri Krishna or Mahavir Hanuman seem to be way out of track. But I have been wrong several times before, in judging.
but there were warriors in mahabharat like arjun, karan, Drona, bhisma and in ramayan there were warriors like khumbakarn, shri ram, lakshman, indrajeet, vishwamitra who can fire thousands of arrows in a single shot.
only those who lived in those era can justify this, who are we to decide it. WE look everything on materialistic basis and so consider this impossible, but it can be beyond our science.
Okay..scientific explanation might be difficult for your question..but lets see this way..it is quite subjective to the eras..In our era, stuff like spacecrafts, aeroplanes, celphones, landing on moon, internet, etc might be considered miracles by the ppl of that Yug..Similarly for us stuff like Devtas coming to earth, flying in the air, strength of boons and curses and all the mantra-tantra vidya are miracles..for them, it was their 'technology' ..and quite normal.
The essence of Mahabharat is not to glorify any individual. We don't need to fight over who the greatest warrior is. We need to understand that great warriors like Bhishma, Drona and Karna lost because they were in the side of adharma. There is so much to learn from this great epic. Cast aside inane things like "who was the better archer", or "who was more brave".
@shaun19475 These days, in this current age of "enlightenment", these simple things, the core of the creation, nobody understands this, or may be they have denied it, that is why they have altered the definitions & twisted the logic.
@shaun19475 This is the essense of Mahabharat ! Just to integrate the wisdom of it but not to ssses it ! The whole world would always be inferior to asses its essense as the epitome is very well concised in Bhagavadgita !! Period.
@shaun19475 This is the essense of Mahabharat ! Just to integrate the wisdom of it but not to asses it ! The whole world would always be inferior to asses its essense as the epitome is very well concised in Bhagavadgita !! Period.
@shaun19475 Yes, Mahabharat is not to asses any one indivudual is great warrior here nor any less. The essense of whole Mahabharat is so concisley hidden in 'Bhagavadgita' !!
@shaun19475 Yes, Mahabharat is not to be assesed by any one indivudual, who is great warrior here nor any less. The essense of whole Mahabharat is so concisley hidden in 'Bhagavadgita' !!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
What happened inside the chakravyuh was not a cowardly act. The collective strength of the weak to crush the stronger is fair gain. Simple rule of war.
i cant believe u r saying this.. who said that karna, duryodhan and all those were weak??? clear up your facts first before justifying that cowardly act where they all attack together on a teenager who was without weapons
lol dude u r saying the same stuff i said.. it is just that our ways of seeing it is different but the conclusion is same. i say that they were weak becoz they all were on wrong side otherwise they were brave warriors. moreover, when a brave person chooses a wrong path he does become weak in terms of ethics but not his own courage and bravery
not really. How they ganged up on Abhimanyu was despicable but all of them were very strong.
Abhimanyu was just much stronger, thats all. In fact according to some versions of the Mahabharat, Krishna worried that Abhimanyu would eventually become stronger than Krishna himself.
Actually Abhimanyu's body was inhabited by a demon when he was in his mother's womb who disobeyed Krishna's warning on not opening a sealed jar with the demon inside (think Pandora's Box).
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I dont consider abhimanyu murder as coward act because pandavas were the first to break the rules when that coward arjun attacked bhishma when his bow was not in his hand then why abhimanyu cannot be killed by playing trick.
Ok for starters, the pandavas couldn't have been the first to break the rules. The karuvas have poisned, cheated using tricked dice, and have committed all kinds of other scams to the pandavas. It is a LAW at that time, that war was to be fought one man against another man with the same weapon of choice. There was no law saying that you could not bring a woman on the battlefield. Karuva's were cowards and couldn't win the war by pure strength.
The Breaking of Rules By Kauravas was First Done NOT in Kurukshetra but in A PlayGround when Duryodhan and Dussassan coming under SSakuni's influence mixed Poison in Porridge and feb Him. It started from there
"There was no law saying that you could not bring a woman on the battlefield." you are wrong. There was such a rule, at least in this tv series. That is the significance of Shikhandin. He/she was technically not a woman. But he/she was a woman at least as far as Bhishma was concerned.
Pandavas have not broken any law by bringing Shikandi... They have certain taken UNFAIR advantage of a law. Their is CLEARLY big difference between the TWO. If not that way, Bhishma is UNBEATABLE.... Shikandi is not a woman. Bhishma considers him as a non-male and does not want to fire arrows in his direction.
bhenchod yeh saina maa chudwane ke liye hai behn chod aapas main behncho pratice kar rahe maa ke loro arjun ki gaand main talwaar kiu nahn chalatey ruko bhen ke lore ko gher lo maaro salle ko haram ke bheej
the Logic for Arjuna to be angry with Jayadrath was because he was given pran daan by pandavas when he tried to insult dropadi in banvasa time. He misbihaved and pandavas made him prisonor.they only let him go cz he was their sisters husband. Bt jayadrath felt insulted and wanted to get back at pandavas and so thats why he asked for 1 day not to b defeated by any pandava except arjuna my shiva and intentionally used at that time due to which Abhimanyu got killed.
What happened inside the chakravyuh was cowardly but it could not be proved. (Just like modern day terrorist attacks). After the sunset the word of mouth got to the Pandavas as many Kaurav soldiers were impresed by this child's bravery. At the funeral Arjun did try to get the truth out of Drona but couldnt.Jayadrath had volunteered to be at the entry point of the vyuh. He had kept his boon from Shiva a secret (Only Krishna knew). Decision to go after him was an emotional outburst from Arjun.
I cannot believe what Pitamah is saying starting 12:30. What was Jaydrath supposed to do? Invite Bhim, Yudhister to help Abhimanyu? No way... he did his duty to fight.
Cowards are the ones who were inside.
Even if Jaydrath kept Abhimanyu's help away why did everyone else break the rules of war.
Arjun is a fool to go after him. He should go after Karna, Drona, Kripacharya who are considered greats and should have stopped Duryodhan and others from breaking rules but instead they participated.
I think it has to do with the then existing rules of engagement... while what the 7 of em did was baad...cutting off supply line was not cool back in the day...sounds funny in 2009 because rules of war have changed..but back in the day...that was a major 'foo paw'...
If one reads the complete translation of the Mahabharat it is very obvious that one to many combats were common. The death of Abhimanyu is hyped by the authors to justify the killing of Karna by Arjuna. Abhimanyu was finally killed by Dushasana's son in a mace fight and not as what is shown by most folks.
You know, you don't make sense. First of all, Yudhishtara etc. were not supply lines. They may be called reinforcements if you like. Supply lines are the supply routes that provide food, and supplies to armies.
The very aim of chakravyuha is to divide and encircle the enemy army. So, Jayadratha is not to be blamed. Others may be blamed, that is a different thing.
i searched the otherday but couldn't find the other episodes maybe because of my failure in searching. I was confused that how can it be ended here, so i asked. But in your answer you wrote 'Idiot'. this is rude and not a gentle behavior to address someone.
lol, did Karna get shot in the face at 33:59?
viratkohli33 1 day ago
Karana is elder bro so he is stronger but he is with adharma so deafeted
meeschetna 1 month ago
hello india
shravan986 1 month ago
i cant even understand what is this why if arjun can defeat karna in 2 minutes then why did he kill karna like a coward and how did karna defeat arjun on 16th day this is undoubtfully a great creation with few mistakes in it
skshivanand8 2 months ago
@skshivanand8 : Ego with 99 Strong emotions are destructive forces . These are much stronger than wisdom . Karna was much stronger than Arjuna . Check for your self . There are many occassions , when , you would have made a decision against your wisdom , falling prey to your own emotions.When it comes to lawfull thinking , let the ways of defeating ur emotions be wrong , doesn't matter , but Law/Dharma should be our foremost goal. This is implicated
truthseeker4720 1 month ago
We all have so much to learn from this. This is what gave us "The Bhagvad Gita."
pforpappu 5 months ago 2
Bhishma tells Arjun not to forgive Jayadratha. By what logic is Jayadratha most responsible for Abhimanyu's death? Was he supposed to stand aside and let everyone enter the Chakravyuh?
metterklume 6 months ago
@metterklume wellsaid iwsa going to ask sameQ( bhishm what a judge)
masterblasterr1 5 months ago
@metterklume, Jayadratha was responsible because going by their rules one warrior was to fight with one only. He knew there were 7 warriors inside chakravyuh's centre and yet did not let any one else accompany Abhimanyu. Judge them by their own rules they set and not by today's "pragmatic behaviour" we would follow.
preserveraide 2 months ago
@metterklume my friend jaydratha was killed because he kick the dead body of abhimannu this is against he low of fight so he must punished for that
bhorshankar 20 hours ago
lol! the arrows during those days were so weak....they couldn't kill, only injure them
carolinaindian 6 months ago
A lot of people blame Dhitrashtra only for the war. It is true that he is the one to blame primarily for the war. But a lot of people were to blame. Don't forget that Time says that if it were in his power to stop the war, he would have told Bhishma to not make the vow at Satyavati's home. Also, Dhitrashtra's mother is to blame also because of the way she acted in front of Vyas. Satyavati is also to blame b/c of her high ambitions.
jiggie181 6 months ago
@sahil3486 when I posted the comment it was a joke...can't believe people took it seriously and replied...but thanks for ur opinion...I wldnt compare a factual human being with mythical stories...I'm Hindu and respect the religion but even I know the mahabharat and ramayan are simply stories to portray the way humans should behave to portray the difference of right and wrong...
1RONLUNG999 9 months ago
@1RONLUNG999
I pity your ignorance dear brother .......
solusindica89 7 months ago
dhritrashtra is such a coward....his solutions are most hilarious...agni ko prathna karunga ke woh pragat hi na ho toh arjun bhi bach jayega aur jaydrata bhi.... ...lol....wat a loser......Reallly ?!!
dude get some objectivity in life .... idiot...;)
though it when vidur, sanjay n even gandhari give it back to him n he goes like "dont burst my bubble"
think at some level he reminds me of britney spears...
dhaval1122 10 months ago 3
@ajayjeev I agree with your interpretation. But I must ask you. Who do you think is more powerful, Arjun or Bruce Lee? I know a hand to hand fight wouldn't be fair as Bruce would be far superior due to his inhuman speed and striking power. However, if Arjun was allowed to use a sword against Bruce's thin cane he uses in Game of Death??
1RONLUNG999 10 months ago
@1RONLUNG999
You cannot compare two greats of two different times actually.
solusindica89 10 months ago
@1RONLUNG999 A normal soldier of mahabarat could defeat bruce lee I am a big fan of bruce lee but truth is truth See 5000 old aryan martial art by russian master.
Arjun can face 1 million army at a time
real aryan martial art had lost
sahil3486 9 months ago 3
Dhitrastra says "Pran tyagne ke pachyat jab SWARG me pandavo se milunga" ... who will allow dhitrashtra to enter into swarg???
dearronak 11 months ago
Arjuna valour has to praised as he is determined that he is willing to do anything to kill the killer of his son. Infact he single handedly destroys 2 Akshaukunis on his own and Kauravas are trapped. If Lord Krishna did not provide confidence the Pandavas could not have won. Lord Krishna called the shots and Arjuna executed it to perfection. Of course, as a human being he had flaws and had his ego...but the way he was so focussed in his tasks are worth of adoration and respect.
ajayjeev 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Trusted Naughty women dating site mworld5.info
uytiify 1 year ago
The one thing I just do not understand about Mahabharat is this:
How did Arjun defeat all opponent leading warriors in the war of Virat single handedly, but in this Dharma war even with the help of Bhima and Krishna, Arjun took this long?!?!? And that to he had to by using deceit???
tycoonpratik 1 year ago
@tycoonpratik During the Virat Arjun was able to use his Divyastra, however for this war, he promised not to use any Divyastra, so that the future doesnt remember him as some1 who just used supreme power and spiritual weapons to defeat everyone, however fought everyone with the similar level of astra as them, to defeat them.
rai747 1 year ago 2
@rai747 Yes Correct If Not When Karan Used nagastra he Could have Used a Powerful Astra To Defeat it
nsundu123 7 months ago
Actually Krsna willed it, he already said all these people are dead- Arjuna just had to follow his instructions.
computermaster 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Guys I've found one link of Mahabharat part 2 i mean the history after the war.
bwtorrents(dot)com/threads/272 686-Mahabharat-Katha-Part-2-(4 5-avi-files)-B(dot)R(dot)Chopra
mit3inn 1 year ago
tum bharat vanshiyo ko partigayen karne me ruchi kyu hai???
aslambhai123211 1 year ago 3
HAHAHAHAHAHA @ 39:24 ..........Duryodhan is one straight up Savage for attacking Arjun when he's not on his chariot...........HAHAHAHA at Duryodhan !!
What a Character !! HAHAHAHAHA
LK56835 1 year ago
Comment removed
LK56835 1 year ago
Blaming Jayadrath is all very well, but what this cleverly disguises is Arjun's own incompetence. An unheard-of warrior like Susharma is able to hold Arjun at bay for two whole days, even with Lord Krishna & Shri Hanuman protecting him!
Even after the Mahabharata war, when Yudhistir did the Ashwamedha yagna, Arjun gets into a fight with his own son Babruvahana, who ends up killing Arjuna as soon as he begins to fight seriously (albeit unwillingly)! Arjuna is then restored to life by Uloopi.
SamSungSamSung9999 1 year ago
@Shaun:19475: I certainly agree with you that this epic is to teach us to lead our lives for the sake of "dharma" and set ourselves in "truth". History is not to fret over but is to learn to make our present better. Also, every story in this epic has sidelined story. There is no need to feel bad that why all this happened but there is a need to know that every action always has a reaction or result.
ra1njita 1 year ago
@ra1njita Dear, nothing not any story of this epic sidelined any inch. It only high-lighted every possible human emosions to the depth ! And such emotions ever happens till the end are high-lighted in the best ways possibles ways and this Epic is a teach for that.. ! if the humanstake it or don't take it, it is the preach of hights, if anyone accepts or doesn't ! It is Shri Krishna who accompained this truth and none other !
wwinds 1 year ago
Drona was a gr8 warrior too being a brahmana..!
He gets pissd off wen arjuna breaks his chariot!! LOL
he was too powerful fr arjuna
MrSaurabh8986 1 year ago
LoL at 30:44 kritvarma's arrow jst flew away in da air :D
BR chopra dint observe dat ;)
MrSaurabh8986 1 year ago
nice uploading .i like it.f, phinda chamar
chamar0001 1 year ago
Now maha bhart like Hindu And Muslim muslim's are Pandvas Hindus are like kavravas its if you understand
gumnam99 1 year ago
Dear Blessed Soul, Please listen to Yatharth Geeta OR Bhagavad Gita, never has Bhagavad Gita been explained so clearly and in so much in depth. It is hence called "Yatharthgeeta, you can download the mp3 of your choice of language from the website yatharthgeeta. com OR search for 'yatharthgeeta' right here on youtube OR go to youtube. com/user/foryatharthgeeta to get a quick preview. God Bless You!
foryatharthgeeta 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Draupati Vast Haran and Abhimanyu's Killing were two main events that made Mahabharat.
The first one started it and the second one ended it.
lovelynight007 1 year ago
@bhasinuscuscable
It's his universe, he's entitled to do what he wants with it. He's the slayer and the slain anyway, remember?
manofsan 1 year ago
Comment removed
kbkushalutube 1 year ago
मुझे यह नहीं समझ आता कि अर्जुन सब को सिर्फ घायल ही क्यों करता है? अवसर मिलाने पर शत्रु को मार ही देना चाहिए था. यदि अभिमन्यु ने भी यही किया होता तो शायद वह वीरगति को प्राप्त नहीं होता.
kbkushalutube 1 year ago
@kbkushalutube are mere bhai. ye yuddh to 18 din chala tha or is serial me sab ku6 upar upar se dikhaya he detail me nahi. to 1 din me 7 logo ko raste me se yuddh kar k hatana koi mamuli baat thodi he.wikipedia me jakar sirf sena ki size dekhna tab andaja ayega ki tab ki sena kesi or kitni badi hua karti thi.
mit3inn 1 year ago
@kbkushalutube उस समय उसका उद्देश्य जयद्रथ था
shanu7uday 1 year ago
Krishna himself say this dialogue 39:21 ... but he did not do accordingly in the case of Karna...
padmarajkp 1 year ago
cool
96ninjagirl 1 year ago
haha stupid duryodhan trying to shoot arjun when he is off his chariot and then he gets wounded!! :)
computerhelper303 1 year ago 2
we r the best religion wise.well I as Hindu can say so.Not bcos in saying so I say something worth saying but bcos I m a Hindu. Any other Ali or George should feel the same about their religion as well. Main point is no religion is small or big.religions are like rivers which finally meets the ALL MIGHTY sea.Our world is meant for peace and brotherhood and this series emphasizes on that very aspect.lets loved and be loved.
ravishankarpandey 1 year ago
@ravishankarpandey You are right there. But that does not mean I should not say that I like Shri Ram and SHri Krishna and their teaching bcause I am not Hindu. that is why I think shanti should be the religion margadarshan chahe koi bhi ho.
veekayart 1 year ago
they are kshatriya women,they don't cry and weep like ordinary women.
prixyz5 1 year ago
draupadi sounds like a man to me lol
computerhelper303 1 year ago
@computerhelper303 why? why should a woman be expected to cry, wail & shed tears all the time?
aparaajita10 1 year ago
@computerhelper303 And in all ages, there have been enough men who behave like women
aparaajita10 1 year ago
@aparaajita10 yup i get it
computerhelper303 1 year ago
@computerhelper303 What do I say? Good?
aparaajita10 1 year ago
@aparaajita10 ya then what are you gonna say?
computerhelper303 1 year ago
Jaidrath had boon that, for one day he will be able to defeat all Pandavas. He intentionally choose this day, so he was accountable, otherwise all Panadavas were with Abhimanyu.....
moviefreak7007 1 year ago
Hats off to Abhimanu
asingh2089 1 year ago 3
LOL at 40:15!
vedicger108 1 year ago
what?? jaidrath was just doing as he was instructed... isolating abhi was not unethical by any means... it was the killing of abhi by 7 warriors together when he was unarmed - that was unethical. if anyone should be forgiven it is jaidrath - instead of holding him accountable for the dubious morals of the other 7.
seeget 1 year ago
i loved jayadraths dialogue... ye suryasta kyuu nahi ho raha!!! hahahahaha!! arjun was simply awesome!!!
desiabhay 1 year ago 3
get em arjun! i love arjun's acting he is soo good....and this war would've never existed if it wasnt for Dhitrashtra..i think he is the one to be blamed for everything.
nandu6890 2 years ago 27
@nandu6890 i agree
interestingly, feroz sarfaraaz khan had to use an alias 'arjun' while playing same role. perhaps it was to obviate unwarranted comments by "not -yet -so -cosmopolitan" audience in 80s
shanu7uday 1 year ago
where is shakuni in this war?I think shakuni is fear with krishna and arjun.That is the cause he did not come in kamal vieu
9310969112 2 years ago
Will you idiots stop comparing science and religion..it is like comparing you lamers with a pig...and complaining to you that your way of behaviour is no tlike the pig..obviously it wouldn't be..see guys if you dont have belief just keep it to yourself..Dont spoil our belief and start a war in place where name of god resides..Krishna was correct Kali yuga stinks with atheists and other un neurulated idiots. If you see it as stone it is a stone. If you see it as god it is god. We see it as God!
ssvenks 2 years ago 3
Instead of dismissing the story of Mahabharat as Fiction, one should uncover and research more about the ancient times. Homer's troy was a fiction till the real Troy was uncovered which proved that all Myths have some kind of Reality in them.
My assumption is that the Ancient people considered Aliens to be Gods. Also, the races mentioned in Mahabharat like Gandharva, Yaksha, Rakshas seemed more like Foreign Tribes or Races unknown to Vedic Indians. Well, that's just my theory.
sesshy34 2 years ago
@sesshy34
Troy is a story and it didn't even happen in india. Assuming you as indian i say try to see what Brass can be bended from your nation and culture rather than other cultures which teach you how to steal gold from one nation and become wealthy. Comparing troy brings out theories in you..try comparing the mahabharatha it will bring out the truth in you which can be proved Science tell us about B.C and A.c our culture speaks of yugas. i yuga equals 1,728,000 human years..so quit comparing
ssvenks 2 years ago
i couldn't agree with you more brother / sister. Right on!
dannyp206 2 years ago
I'm a humble brother :)
ssvenks 2 years ago
@sesshy34 : My limited reading of various versions of mahabharat also tell me the same thing as your comment.
rajankamat 1 year ago
Comment removed
HindaviSwarajya 2 years ago
If it were fiction, then how do we have places and names that still exist today?
Take Harry Potter series for example, do we have birthday celebration of Dumbledore, no right?
THere are too many evidences that suggest the validty of this war...
sonanideepak 2 years ago 6
hahaha thats hilarious!
b0unce0b0unce 2 years ago 2
why the hell does Karna keep thinking that he is better than Arjun?? at Draupadi's swayamwar, when Arjun was disguised as a Brahmin and he won, Karna alerted him and Arjun's arrows damaged Karna's bows.....and then, in the Virat war, Arjun defeated all the warriors from Hastinapur, including Karna....and now, Arjun defeats Karna again while seeking Jaydrath....why does Karna keep thinking he's the best??
nitrai1991 2 years ago
@nitrai1991 well, when arjun and karna met for the fourth time, karna beat him bad and embarassed him worse! how bout that? :)
pushpargha 1 year ago
because its every character is like of fiction stories.starting from bhisma himself. her mother is ganga a river how can be this. if it is symbolic name ok i agree but we see she always appears whenever he want to meet. he got icha murtyu vardan it is not practical and not possible.
kmustg 2 years ago
This is not Fiction !! if it's fiction then Virgin Mary and Jesus or else is also Fiction. How can a virgin begot a children? and bla..bla... !!
GreenCheese500 2 years ago 4
Well first of all we need to know if you believe in god. If you do not then i can agree that it is fiction for you but if you do believe in god you cannot say it is fiction. If you believe in god then everything is possible.
iaarl 2 years ago
it is fiction or true story if y analysis honestly it is pure fiction with some positive aspect.
affection among brothers and unity. love to ur motherland.
karma theory etc etc
kmustg 2 years ago
Fiction come on, this is happened for real and try to learn from it.
confidential303 2 years ago
may be u have faith in this book. but if u anlysiswithout biasand honest u will agree with me
kmustg 2 years ago
in social science anlysis are always biased and to be objective is really hard, you have to make certain assumptions.., and you also have to think where this knowledge comes from..people at this time cannot come with such a wisdom as the bhagvat geeta. I admit i dont know the geeta in all aspects, just a little.. but what is your problem why do you think it is fiction?
confidential303 2 years ago
When i analyse it honestly i do not find any fiction.If for you it is fiction then you have to agree that the one who wrote this story had a more than fabulous imagination. He should have been a genious.
iaarl 2 years ago
@kmustg hey mate, dwarika nagri where lord krishna lived is still der in india under the sea. it was found just before 18 years. so it is not fiction my frnd.
mit3inn 1 year ago 2
@kmustg - it is not a fiction. But a tale told by a lot of people over the time. They kept adding whatever they experienced at the time. Devrath (Pitamah) is described to go to ganga tat to meet his mom - possible she was cremated there or she lived there. He felt like he was talking to her. About ichha mrutyu, I think the medicine was quite advance during the period and a few like Bhishma could afford it. Some say he might be half alien.
angeladu16 7 months ago
Because of all these rules in war that Indian ruler were later on fucked by muslim invaders in battlefields. There should be only one goal in war and that is to win.
nsawaan 2 years ago
sanjay answer after 23 is cool...he always remind him of lakshgrah
gujjubakwas 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nepal connection with Mongolia-China-Korea-Japan
watch the video "Connexion of Mongolia-Kirat:Revealing the Mystery of Origin of Phallus Stone Worship" which explain roots of Hinduism.
Kiratas are the Indo-Mongoloid and find refences in ancient texts such as Veda, Puranas and epics.
Also check video "Sakela~The Greatest Festival of Kirat People" to learn Kirat's history, religion and culture.
This festival once banned in Nepal was only officially recognized in 2001.
TaMaGuRaLi 2 years ago
you idiot...i can show you a video made by me..in which it is shown that i was the old king of all races and people...master of the universe...would you believe?
gujjubakwas 2 years ago
karn was not a great warrior,this episod shows this.
rajwadesunil 2 years ago
At Minute 38, This is the reason why Krishna gave it back to duryodhan with Karna's killing... :-)
dullesfarm 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ha, ha. What a bollywood style acting? B.R.Chopra is a moron. He has changed the story. Bhisma telling Arjuna not to forgive Jaydrath. This never happens. Also, Arjuna, a great warrior is shown like a sissy, crying over his son's death like a child. Why do these morons not read the original story written by Veda Vyasa?
rsridhar 2 years ago
yes i do agree with you it never happened like this
roselyndevi 2 years ago
Pls don't make blasphemous comments on someone like BR Chopra who had given us such a nice TV series to watch.
esrujan 2 years ago
The story has indeed been tampered a bit but there are lots of episodes that indicate that they have read the original epic in detail. The mass is not mature enough to hear everthing and hence they have only focussed on the essence instead of controversies. Even if it is a small mistake we shld not highlight it, respecting the tremendous effort in getting the great work to the general mass..who would otherwise not make an effort themselves to read it.
GokulWasi 2 years ago 2
BRC and his team have done a good job in bringing this to the masses. It must have involved massive amounts of efforts from lots of people. We are very thankful for that.
But that is no reason to positively criticize. Mahabharata had lots and lots of subtleties. Considering them can indeed teach us much more.
But careless dialogs can wrongly twist the interpretation of the story.
illopos 2 years ago
You can post the subtleties as supplements, here, so that we can all relish it. As for people like BRC or Sagar, their responsiblities are huge. Most people out there are ready to fight at every little chance thrown to them..instead of trying to enjoy. But I know what you mean..... especially the new serials like Jai Sri Krishna or Mahavir Hanuman seem to be way out of track. But I have been wrong several times before, in judging.
GokulWasi 2 years ago
she is acting too much 14:25 woh sathrani banne layak nahi hai :|
utubekhiladi 2 years ago
One arrow becoming 8 may be invention of B R Chopra.
B R Chopra's Version is NOT Authentic though it has Appeal
humbleRaj 2 years ago
but there were warriors in mahabharat like arjun, karan, Drona, bhisma and in ramayan there were warriors like khumbakarn, shri ram, lakshman, indrajeet, vishwamitra who can fire thousands of arrows in a single shot.
utubekhiladi 2 years ago
only those who lived in those era can justify this, who are we to decide it. WE look everything on materialistic basis and so consider this impossible, but it can be beyond our science.
IndAmit 2 years ago
tell me one thing, how come one arrow becomes 8 arrows ?
ye mujhe pata hai ki karan, arjun, indrajeet(in ramayan) jaise maharathi ek sath 1000+ vaan chala sakte hai. lekin kaise?
utubekhiladi 2 years ago
I am pretty sure if we knew, we'd still be applying that in combat.
It could be because of some mantras.
amityaadav 2 years ago
yep, we need that technology.
utubekhiladi 2 years ago
Okay..scientific explanation might be difficult for your question..but lets see this way..it is quite subjective to the eras..In our era, stuff like spacecrafts, aeroplanes, celphones, landing on moon, internet, etc might be considered miracles by the ppl of that Yug..Similarly for us stuff like Devtas coming to earth, flying in the air, strength of boons and curses and all the mantra-tantra vidya are miracles..for them, it was their 'technology' ..and quite normal.
kumarsjoshi 2 years ago 3
that's exactly what my grandmaa explained me and i appreciate your comment...
utubekhiladi 2 years ago
proud to b born in Danveer Karnabbhumi "KARNAL".
haryanaguys 2 years ago
At 33 Minute.. Karna could not hold off Arjun here, forget about defeating, still claims he is bigger than Arjun, and his fans too...
dullesfarm 2 years ago
The essence of Mahabharat is not to glorify any individual. We don't need to fight over who the greatest warrior is. We need to understand that great warriors like Bhishma, Drona and Karna lost because they were in the side of adharma. There is so much to learn from this great epic. Cast aside inane things like "who was the better archer", or "who was more brave".
shaun19475 2 years ago 52
@shaun19475 These days, in this current age of "enlightenment", these simple things, the core of the creation, nobody understands this, or may be they have denied it, that is why they have altered the definitions & twisted the logic.
aparaajita10 1 year ago
@shaun19475 This is the essense of Mahabharat ! Just to integrate the wisdom of it but not to ssses it ! The whole world would always be inferior to asses its essense as the epitome is very well concised in Bhagavadgita !! Period.
wwinds 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@shaun19475 This is the essense of Mahabharat ! Just to integrate the wisdom of it but not to asses it ! The whole world would always be inferior to asses its essense as the epitome is very well concised in Bhagavadgita !! Period.
wwinds 1 year ago
@shaun19475 Yes, Mahabharat is not to asses any one indivudual is great warrior here nor any less. The essense of whole Mahabharat is so concisley hidden in 'Bhagavadgita' !!
wwinds 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@shaun19475 Yes, Mahabharat is not to be assesed by any one indivudual, who is great warrior here nor any less. The essense of whole Mahabharat is so concisley hidden in 'Bhagavadgita' !!
wwinds 1 year ago
@shaun19475 Nothing happend in reall life all is Methologey ,so just watch the show
jeet027 1 year ago
@jeet027 no...this is a show that re-iterates all that has actually happened on earth thousands yrs back...
This whole katha of mahabharat aint JUST a myth...every atom of it is plain pellucid truth...it was A Tragedy that was authentic.
tanvee28 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What happened inside the chakravyuh was not a cowardly act. The collective strength of the weak to crush the stronger is fair gain. Simple rule of war.
Reddy26 2 years ago
i cant believe u r saying this.. who said that karna, duryodhan and all those were weak??? clear up your facts first before justifying that cowardly act where they all attack together on a teenager who was without weapons
johnsalman66 2 years ago
Of course they were weak. Otherwise it would have been sufficient for one of them to finish off abhimanyu.
Reddy26 2 years ago 2
lol dude u r saying the same stuff i said.. it is just that our ways of seeing it is different but the conclusion is same. i say that they were weak becoz they all were on wrong side otherwise they were brave warriors. moreover, when a brave person chooses a wrong path he does become weak in terms of ethics but not his own courage and bravery
johnsalman66 2 years ago
not really. How they ganged up on Abhimanyu was despicable but all of them were very strong.
Abhimanyu was just much stronger, thats all. In fact according to some versions of the Mahabharat, Krishna worried that Abhimanyu would eventually become stronger than Krishna himself.
Actually Abhimanyu's body was inhabited by a demon when he was in his mother's womb who disobeyed Krishna's warning on not opening a sealed jar with the demon inside (think Pandora's Box).
pratt123 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I dont consider abhimanyu murder as coward act because pandavas were the first to break the rules when that coward arjun attacked bhishma when his bow was not in his hand then why abhimanyu cannot be killed by playing trick.
sgupta850 2 years ago
Ok for starters, the pandavas couldn't have been the first to break the rules. The karuvas have poisned, cheated using tricked dice, and have committed all kinds of other scams to the pandavas. It is a LAW at that time, that war was to be fought one man against another man with the same weapon of choice. There was no law saying that you could not bring a woman on the battlefield. Karuva's were cowards and couldn't win the war by pure strength.
shadesofshadows321 2 years ago 3
r u stupid shikandi was not a women he was a he she so get ur facts strait then talk
munish16 2 years ago
The Breaking of Rules By Kauravas was First Done NOT in Kurukshetra but in A PlayGround when Duryodhan and Dussassan coming under SSakuni's influence mixed Poison in Porridge and feb Him. It started from there
humbleRaj 2 years ago 3
"There was no law saying that you could not bring a woman on the battlefield." you are wrong. There was such a rule, at least in this tv series. That is the significance of Shikhandin. He/she was technically not a woman. But he/she was a woman at least as far as Bhishma was concerned.
illopos 2 years ago
@sgupta850,
Pandavas have not broken any law by bringing Shikandi... They have certain taken UNFAIR advantage of a law. Their is CLEARLY big difference between the TWO. If not that way, Bhishma is UNBEATABLE.... Shikandi is not a woman. Bhishma considers him as a non-male and does not want to fire arrows in his direction.
esrujan 2 years ago
Comment removed
illopos 2 years ago
Nope. Bheeshma Keeps Himself Armed Till He falls on The Bed of Arrows.
And Shikhandi is NOT A Woman, He is A Tranvassite
humbleRaj 2 years ago
this was no simple war. This was a war of justice which devolved into brutal regular war.
And your "simple rule of war" only applies to the Kali Yuga. This was a different Yuga with different acceptable social constraints and rules.
Duh!
pratt123 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
bhenchod yeh saina maa chudwane ke liye hai behn chod aapas main behncho pratice kar rahe maa ke loro arjun ki gaand main talwaar kiu nahn chalatey ruko bhen ke lore ko gher lo maaro salle ko haram ke bheej
troublesomehunk 2 years ago
Humorous comment by Krishna at 20:57. "Tum Bharat Vanshiyon ko pratigyain karne me itni ruchi kyun hai ?" humorous comment.
montychandra 2 years ago 6
the Logic for Arjuna to be angry with Jayadrath was because he was given pran daan by pandavas when he tried to insult dropadi in banvasa time. He misbihaved and pandavas made him prisonor.they only let him go cz he was their sisters husband. Bt jayadrath felt insulted and wanted to get back at pandavas and so thats why he asked for 1 day not to b defeated by any pandava except arjuna my shiva and intentionally used at that time due to which Abhimanyu got killed.
Skyisunlimit 2 years ago
What happened inside the chakravyuh was cowardly but it could not be proved. (Just like modern day terrorist attacks). After the sunset the word of mouth got to the Pandavas as many Kaurav soldiers were impresed by this child's bravery. At the funeral Arjun did try to get the truth out of Drona but couldnt.Jayadrath had volunteered to be at the entry point of the vyuh. He had kept his boon from Shiva a secret (Only Krishna knew). Decision to go after him was an emotional outburst from Arjun.
itsmeeeeeeeeeee 3 years ago
I cannot believe what Pitamah is saying starting 12:30. What was Jaydrath supposed to do? Invite Bhim, Yudhister to help Abhimanyu? No way... he did his duty to fight.
Cowards are the ones who were inside.
Even if Jaydrath kept Abhimanyu's help away why did everyone else break the rules of war.
Arjun is a fool to go after him. He should go after Karna, Drona, Kripacharya who are considered greats and should have stopped Duryodhan and others from breaking rules but instead they participated.
arvindsdarwin 3 years ago 2
I didn't get that logic either, but in the end, he did it anyway.
bitesh 3 years ago
I think it has to do with the then existing rules of engagement... while what the 7 of em did was baad...cutting off supply line was not cool back in the day...sounds funny in 2009 because rules of war have changed..but back in the day...that was a major 'foo paw'...
prashanthosur 3 years ago
If one reads the complete translation of the Mahabharat it is very obvious that one to many combats were common. The death of Abhimanyu is hyped by the authors to justify the killing of Karna by Arjuna. Abhimanyu was finally killed by Dushasana's son in a mace fight and not as what is shown by most folks.
karthige79 2 years ago
You know, you don't make sense. First of all, Yudhishtara etc. were not supply lines. They may be called reinforcements if you like. Supply lines are the supply routes that provide food, and supplies to armies.
The very aim of chakravyuha is to divide and encircle the enemy army. So, Jayadratha is not to be blamed. Others may be blamed, that is a different thing.
illopos 2 years ago
You mean to say Pankaj Dheer (Karana) got hit by Arjun (Arjuna) ?
BalrajSingh07 3 years ago
at 33:58-33:59, Karan really did get hit in the eye by Arjun in real life, I mean the actor, like that really hit him in the eye in this scene.
DaRealDeal2008 3 years ago
yeah...it looks like it..hehe
prashanthosur 3 years ago
it's not funny yo, but it is part of acting especially if you are doing you're own stunts which is pretty admirable
DaRealDeal2008 3 years ago
actually there is another episode where it is too obvious..that Pankaj Dheer really got hurt...a few episodes back...
prashanthosur 3 years ago
i know which one you are referring to..he gets hit in the face and you can easily see from his reaction that he is really hurt...
novicer16 2 years ago
wow..Arjun was really angry upon hearing of Abhimanyu's death. Cool episode!!!!
nitrai1991 3 years ago 4
post episode 85 and the remaining ones pleaseee
Gregb615 3 years ago
Amazing. I would like to thank the ONE who is posting all these episodes. Great Mate.
skprem01 3 years ago 5
Is this the last episode?
sharmabangla 3 years ago
no idiot haha
sabaijana 3 years ago
wow!i know now u r a stupid.
sharmabangla 3 years ago
how m i stupid.???
haha i mean how can this be a last part...when it's till 94 eps.
hahahahah
sabaijana 3 years ago
i searched the otherday but couldn't find the other episodes maybe because of my failure in searching. I was confused that how can it be ended here, so i asked. But in your answer you wrote 'Idiot'. this is rude and not a gentle behavior to address someone.
sharmabangla 3 years ago
hay hay..kwl kwl..
i didn't meant to offend too..
soory. if i hurt to.. but that wasn't my intentation .. i'll take back my word...4 u.
sabaijana 3 years ago
it's ok. thanx
sharmabangla 3 years ago