Added: 5 years ago
From: DanielsNews
Views: 15,184
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • And no A building collapse cannot cause huge pieces of steel to fly hundreds of feet away. You would need enormous explosive energy to make such large mass fly so far away

  • The Debris piles of the twin towers were less than 3 stories in height

  • @agentzippo So you don't know the were 6 underground stories?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @agentzippo Yeah strange how when a big building falls down it gets shorter. Moron.

  • The debris pile should be around 12 stories high, even in a controlled demolition. Add that to the fact that WTC7, a building less than half of the height of the twin towers left a debris pile much larger! The buildings were turned into dust, and even demolition explosives will not do this. I suggest you all visit w w w (dot) drjudywood (dot) com for more evidence of exotic weapons being used to destroy the world trade center.

  • Nano-thermite my friend. Interesting to see who has the patent on it too.

  • if it was a pancake collapse then huge chunks wouldnt be fying hundres of feet away

    it was a controlled demolition

  • anyone else see an explosion as the top of the building falls into the area in which the plane crash occurred? explain someoneeee

  • Hey, truthers, whats 33-13? Cus those look like the end and start times of collapse. And hey, at 42 seconds, I can clearly see about 55 stories of core columns, I thought those were missing.

  • Watch at 19 seconds. See tha hunk of debris falling to the left side of the tower? It is falling at freefall speed. The rest of the building is not. That turns the freefall argument to shit.

  • We want know who attack the WTC...Al Qaeda not exist, Al Qaeda was born to CIA.

  • I hope that you are aware of what occurred at Cinncinatti Airport on 911? Flight 93 landed; the passengers were ushered off the plane, and never seen again. If you do not believe me, call the airport.

  • Yeah the airport in Cincinatti knows the passengers from the sirplanes that crashed were taken off but they are not telling you! But they will if you call them

  • http://www.ebaumsworld.com/200­6/08/building-implosiion.html folks thats a large building being imploded, much SMALLER than the WTC. look at how it's done. whoever thinks the building had explosives lpaces in it, this should shut you up, it's clear that it did not.

  • Obviously the explosives couldn't be on such a wide scale, set up so neatly like normal implosions. It would have to have the least amount of explosives to make the building collapse, because it would be suspicious if there were so many flashes and explosions, yes?

  • Man, you have obviously not seen the photographs of the white haze comming out of the mechanical floors b4 either tower had collapsed.

  • Also the video here is in a sorta slo-mo.So dont take it to literally when it comes to the overall time it took to collapse.

  • The two best videos ive seen that screems guilt for the government are 9/11 Revisited and 9/11 loose change on Google Video.Watch in that order to wake up to whats going on around you.Your and my children are going to be led by these poeple when our life comes to an end.It scares the hel1 out of me to think that.

  • Government versus science woot government wins!This was done by my own government.To all non believers out there look up operation northwoods on wikipedia.com.Its an unclassified document from the 60's till read dont form opinion to hastily as it hangs them out to dry.

  • explain how the weight of the bottom of the WTC towers which weighted more than part from the hole and above, attracted a pancaking collapse of that speed? That defies the laws of physics, it's IMPOSSIBLE! Either it's a conspiracy or Science is 100% wrong.

  • http://forums.randi.org/forumi­ndex.php

  • i'm waiting for conspirator number 536253 to leak to the new york times

  • We all had to take a ticket...there is one heck of a long line. Got yours?

  • http://chronicle.com/temp/repr­int.php?id=j2dll9sp4mf4rtkp62d­hg6yxsm3jt43c

  • http://911research.wtc7.net/es­says/gopm/index.html

  • http://www.geocities.com/debun­king911

  • http://911research.wtc7.net/es­says/gopm/index.html

  • INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM

    INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM

  • INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM

    INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more