Fiat currency is fraudulent. Fractional reserve banking is fraudulent. The Federal Reserve and FDIC are fraudulent institutions created by the government. Manipulating interest rates is fraudulent. Allowing banks to mark their toxic assets at face value, instead of at true market value, is accounting fraud. The massive amount of off-balance-sheet transactions the banks have, is fraudulent.
Our entire banking system is based almost entirely on fraud.
He didn't connect the dots regarding how having such a high score in the past led to the financial meltdown. Something is amiss in his causal premise.
All economic bubbles are created by government policy. Start with fractional fiat currency and the Community Reinvestment Act. Then get back to us here in reality.
@helltrackrider Bush left office with a $459 billion deficit. That was after 8 years. Obama came in and spent $1.4 TRILLION in under a year. Did you see where the Dems want to raise the Debt Ceiling to $1.9 TRILLION for their 2010 spending budget. Guess that is another Republican problem in your blind liberal eyes?
read any of my previous posts, far from liberal...
The previous comment was geared towards rebuplicans...i was simply clarifying that no Republican will solve the problem...government has been GROWING (spending has been increasing) since WW1...hasnt stopped for one day.
No Republican or Democrat will stop this...none.
Need true Libertarian/Constitutionalist in Congress and White House...period.
RINOS won`t solve a thing, only strict Originalists aka Constitutionalists will. No,not the Ron Paul head-in-the-sand types either. The GOP and the Democrats are like 2 passengers in the same car,same destination.Each take a turn at the wheel. The diff is the democrat floors it and goes 100 MPH and the RINO simply observes the speed limit.
Ron Paul has his head well out of the sand...he is the only person to speak of right now that has legislative voting capacity that actually knows what the hell he is doing and why he is voting the way he votes...
Every war in islam history hs been a direct result of land disput. The islamic people do not wish to invade and conquer America; and they certainly wish no harm against us because we are "free and independent"...if that was the case, they would have been fighting with us long before our interventionist policies...but they didnt.
remove all our troops from abroad, every military establishment and just maybe we wont have to fight these endless, money pit wars.
@helltrackrider Islam is about the geography of the mind. They demand all bow to their god and the fact you didn`t know they invaded Europe is STUNNING! What next, the CIA bombed the WTCs with remote controlled planes and used demolitions that no one saw being planted ! ?(shakes head,walks away)
@helltrackrider So far you didn`t know about islam`s invasion of Europe. You have no idea what the koran dictates in regards to infidels and to top it all of you know jack shit of the US Constitution. Try Article 1 Section 8,then get back to us here on planet Earth. What next from you Paulists, it was 911 was an inside job, the CIA has done a coup and taken over the USA. Now what, it was 'Da Jooz, Da JOOZ ! " ?
pathetic...Article 1, Section 8 to uphold occupying other Nations in a time of peace...
also, doesnt it say Congress has teh power to declare War?...funny, i thought that they "voted" that power to the President to declare war...when it specifically says "The Congress shall have Power To...declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water"...
yep...un-Constitutional War, un-Constitutional occupance of foreign nations...
@helltrackrider It`s clear you`re an obvious Paul crank now. S.korea is not being "occupied", Germany. Iraq,etc. NONE of these countries` govt.s have stated the yare "occupied". You`re straw man is exposed. Congress did declare war and the Constitution does not specify HOW Congress must word it. Try P.L. 107 - 243 then get back to us here on planet Earth. U know jack shit of the US Con. Look, you Paulists are gonna get your heads handed to u when u think u can debate your kook ideas.
this is prohibited by the Constitution as it is not specified within the Constitution, seeing as these other Nations did not sign the Constitution to be governed by our Federal Republic...so, their border are off limits to the reach of our government...period.
"Authorizing" the President to proceed with military action far differs from "Declaring" war on a nation, wait...on a religion, wait...on terror...any rate, Un Constitutional.
@helltrackrider The Constitution specifically authorizes a Military but does not specify how to word any deceleration of war. You seem to accept a theoretical military as long as that theoretical military does nothing. Try P.L. 107 - 243 is VERY specific and the military achieved its goal and beyond, it`s repairing what it broke thru sheer magnanimity. The PL doesn`t get anymore Constitutional.
You deny the koran specifically dictates the conversion of all infidels?
You can quote the Constitution all you want but that will not make it right.Our founders did not envision the military setting up camp in 130 foreign countries,the military was to protect us from invaders,not to strong arm others into doing things our way.
Another Paulist feeling his oats comin outta the woodwork? Should there be troops in Germany or Europe now that Communism has been neutered, `course not. To argue that people must be "strong armed" into believing in inalienable rights is laughable. These rights are innate and natural. It`s the opposite,they want us to convert to islam. Sheesh, u paulists are in a Heritage Foundation posting. Your head in the sand kook ideas only fly amongst yourselves
Fiat currency is fraudulent. Fractional reserve banking is fraudulent. The Federal Reserve and FDIC are fraudulent institutions created by the government. Manipulating interest rates is fraudulent. Allowing banks to mark their toxic assets at face value, instead of at true market value, is accounting fraud. The massive amount of off-balance-sheet transactions the banks have, is fraudulent.
Our entire banking system is based almost entirely on fraud.
mikemat3307 1 year ago
He didn't connect the dots regarding how having such a high score in the past led to the financial meltdown. Something is amiss in his causal premise.
jimbond2000 2 years ago
All economic bubbles are created by government policy. Start with fractional fiat currency and the Community Reinvestment Act. Then get back to us here in reality.
classic7890 2 years ago
I am so sick of this Republican/Democrat thing. Hold them ALL accountable!
ejinmi 2 years ago
Get the Republicans back "AS SOON AS POSSIBLE".
biarritz59 2 years ago 4
Bush spent more than any previous President...didnt veto ONE spending bill.
Republicans of his like will fix nothing, just add to the problem.
helltrackrider 2 years ago
Still, in either of his terms he still spent less than 0bama did in just his first year.
Bush wasn't a good conservative, but he was certainly doing a better job than what we've got now.
AreThereNoMoreNames 2 years ago 3
@helltrackrider Bush left office with a $459 billion deficit. That was after 8 years. Obama came in and spent $1.4 TRILLION in under a year. Did you see where the Dems want to raise the Debt Ceiling to $1.9 TRILLION for their 2010 spending budget. Guess that is another Republican problem in your blind liberal eyes?
NCMan28025 2 years ago
haha...
funny on your assumptions of me as a liberal...
very funny...
read any of my previous posts, far from liberal...
The previous comment was geared towards rebuplicans...i was simply clarifying that no Republican will solve the problem...government has been GROWING (spending has been increasing) since WW1...hasnt stopped for one day.
No Republican or Democrat will stop this...none.
Need true Libertarian/Constitutionalist in Congress and White House...period.
helltrackrider 2 years ago
RINOS won`t solve a thing, only strict Originalists aka Constitutionalists will. No,not the Ron Paul head-in-the-sand types either. The GOP and the Democrats are like 2 passengers in the same car,same destination.Each take a turn at the wheel. The diff is the democrat floors it and goes 100 MPH and the RINO simply observes the speed limit.
classic7890 2 years ago
Ron Paul Head-in-the-sand types?
explain...
Ron Paul has his head well out of the sand...he is the only person to speak of right now that has legislative voting capacity that actually knows what the hell he is doing and why he is voting the way he votes...
helltrackrider 2 years ago
Paul thinks he can ignore Islam and it will just go away and not bother us. Tell that to Charles Martel.
classic7890 2 years ago
Islam is not a problem...this is the mentality of the NeoCons who have to have a "Threat to society" in order to thrive...
Our military establishment in other nations and interfering with others religious beliefs abroad; this is a problem...Paul is dead on.
helltrackrider 2 years ago
@helltrackrider you`re simply naive and ignorant of history. Charles Martel, look it up, learn it and repent the simplistic errors of your ways.
classic7890 2 years ago
naive and ignorant?
Every war in islam history hs been a direct result of land disput. The islamic people do not wish to invade and conquer America; and they certainly wish no harm against us because we are "free and independent"...if that was the case, they would have been fighting with us long before our interventionist policies...but they didnt.
remove all our troops from abroad, every military establishment and just maybe we wont have to fight these endless, money pit wars.
helltrackrider 2 years ago
@helltrackrider Islam is about the geography of the mind. They demand all bow to their god and the fact you didn`t know they invaded Europe is STUNNING! What next, the CIA bombed the WTCs with remote controlled planes and used demolitions that no one saw being planted ! ?(shakes head,walks away)
classic7890 2 years ago
from their own mouth...
they attacked America, and other countries involved with America, as a direct result of America occupying other countries...
how more blatent can it get?
besides, what is the necessity of America establishing a military presence in any other Country but our own?...none.
Where does it allow for this in the US Constitution?...nowhere.
Our founders knew alot more about liberty and freedom that the past 100 years of Presidency..they denounced foreign occupation
helltrackrider 2 years ago
@helltrackrider So far you didn`t know about islam`s invasion of Europe. You have no idea what the koran dictates in regards to infidels and to top it all of you know jack shit of the US Constitution. Try Article 1 Section 8,then get back to us here on planet Earth. What next from you Paulists, it was 911 was an inside job, the CIA has done a coup and taken over the USA. Now what, it was 'Da Jooz, Da JOOZ ! " ?
classic7890 2 years ago
pathetic...Article 1, Section 8 to uphold occupying other Nations in a time of peace...
also, doesnt it say Congress has teh power to declare War?...funny, i thought that they "voted" that power to the President to declare war...when it specifically says "The Congress shall have Power To...declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water"...
yep...un-Constitutional War, un-Constitutional occupance of foreign nations...
helltrackrider 2 years ago
@helltrackrider It`s clear you`re an obvious Paul crank now. S.korea is not being "occupied", Germany. Iraq,etc. NONE of these countries` govt.s have stated the yare "occupied". You`re straw man is exposed. Congress did declare war and the Constitution does not specify HOW Congress must word it. Try P.L. 107 - 243 then get back to us here on planet Earth. U know jack shit of the US Con. Look, you Paulists are gonna get your heads handed to u when u think u can debate your kook ideas.
classic7890 2 years ago
Is our military within other nations borders?
yes.
this is prohibited by the Constitution as it is not specified within the Constitution, seeing as these other Nations did not sign the Constitution to be governed by our Federal Republic...so, their border are off limits to the reach of our government...period.
"Authorizing" the President to proceed with military action far differs from "Declaring" war on a nation, wait...on a religion, wait...on terror...any rate, Un Constitutional.
helltrackrider 2 years ago
@helltrackrider The Constitution specifically authorizes a Military but does not specify how to word any deceleration of war. You seem to accept a theoretical military as long as that theoretical military does nothing. Try P.L. 107 - 243 is VERY specific and the military achieved its goal and beyond, it`s repairing what it broke thru sheer magnanimity. The PL doesn`t get anymore Constitutional.
You deny the koran specifically dictates the conversion of all infidels?
classic7890 2 years ago
You can quote the Constitution all you want but that will not make it right.Our founders did not envision the military setting up camp in 130 foreign countries,the military was to protect us from invaders,not to strong arm others into doing things our way.
mcap52 2 years ago
Another Paulist feeling his oats comin outta the woodwork? Should there be troops in Germany or Europe now that Communism has been neutered, `course not. To argue that people must be "strong armed" into believing in inalienable rights is laughable. These rights are innate and natural. It`s the opposite,they want us to convert to islam. Sheesh, u paulists are in a Heritage Foundation posting. Your head in the sand kook ideas only fly amongst yourselves
classic7890 2 years ago
actually, they have. look at the barbars off the coast of north africa as soon as right after the nation was created
retardstupidass 2 years ago
Getting FACTS from the Heritage Foundation...
... is like taking dietary advice from Ronald McDonald...
treid100182 1 year ago
What a surprise. Government is messing up the economy. Who'dda thunk it?
ilikenoodles1 2 years ago 9