So tell me how did Noah take 7 days to not only gather the animals.. but find one male + female of each species to later populate the Earth. This is impossible for any human capabalities. Believe in your own way of thinking and realize what is truth.
@InternetDarkLord Oh no it happened there's no doubt in my mind about that.. U know there enough evidence of it.. I mean petrified clams being found in mount Everest? In the Closed position? 1st of all when Clams die they open & 2nd of all soft bodies creatures just don't petrify today & in mount Everest at that? The mountain didn't exist 4,000+ years ago!! The Flood happened so quickly it killed so many critters in break neck speed! Genesis 7:11 Also u look @ The sediment on the Oceans floors.
@To411u Absolute nonsense! Mount Everest was formed over millions of years by tectonic plate activity pushing sedimentary rock, including fossils, slowly higher. And many kinds of strata cannot form underwater, like desert varnish. There is no evidence of Noah's Farce, the massive inbreeding that would have resulted alone shows it never happened.
@InternetDarkLord It doesn't take millions of years for mountains to form thats a lie! Just like it doesn't take millions of years for things to petrify the only argument u have is time, & everyone else that believes in Evolution, trust me time doesn't solve anything if anything it makes things worse!! Yes it seems impossible to us but God can make anything possible also tell me why there are over 270 flood legends today?
@To411u Yes, things like mountains rising or life evolving can be directly observed today, but not cherubs or talking snakes.
Many fairy tales are very widespread, because they appeal to human nature: mermaids, sun gods, moon goddesses, living ape-men....are they all real? So why believe some over others?
@InternetDarkLord Exactly!! I wouldn't go so far as saying evolving more or less ur right though.. & yes that is t rue, but there are still many things/ unexplained phenomena that occur in our world today that we do not understand, for 1 in the World trade centers the smoke & flames made abnormal images, I've seen strange shadowy figures some nights I can't fall asleep & things like poltergeist, mind control & Nephilim are real there have even been Nephilim skeletons found, Giant human remains!
@InternetDarkLord Well no not exactly.. I just believe that there are certain things that science cannot explain, & this is true.. Its still limited for the most part & may always be that way.. If this makes me a fool then so be it or carry that notion that I am, but it doesn't mean I hate u! On the contrary I would still pray for you, because I love everybody regardless of who u are or what u believe..
@InternetDarkLord The supernatural & spiritual world is very real I know it, & so far from what I've been able to gather it defies all logic/ reasoning so yes a supernatural story is still very much possible I believe.
@InternetDarkLord Because theres telekinesis, ghosts/poltergeist & other unseen forces that our world does not understand & things that have power but are unseen elements, You know nobody actually sees stars!! Its scientifically true!! There so many light years away that all we see is the light emanating from them, but not its chemical composition even with the best microscope, same with air-particles in this room for example there all here but we don't see them..
@InternetDarkLord Haha lol but evidence doesn't always mean u have to give up on the posibility science only knows so much & ya!! X-files is great! =D
As soon as this imaginary boat landed and the animals were let go, the carnivores would eat the herbivores, and then starve to death once the food supply dries up. Everything would die lol.
Huh...and here I thought that the cross-validation of methods in chronostratigraphy, sedimentology, biochronostratigraphy, magnetochronostratigraphy, and radiometric dating had already provided substantial amounts of evidence suggesting that no such flood ever occurred....should have never gotten that useless master's degree in geology. :(
The flood actually came from a heavenly deluge or heavenly ocean. Yes their was an ocean in the sky before the flood. Genesis 7:11 says: the springs of the vast watery deep were broken open and the floodgates of the heavens were opened. notice vast watery deep, and floodgates of the heaven!
Jehovah God gives us his word the bible, please gain its understanding by drawing closer to him so that you may understand it.
LOL good ol scientists, the waters came from the heavens. Understand that the flood was the first time it rained. Waters was suspended in the sky, imagine looking at the sky and see a huge body of water surrounding the entire earth. scientists say that environment would be oxygen rich and life would live considerably longer yet they faild to see the signifigance of it as it relates to the flood, even life itself. Adam lived to be over 900 years, after the flood human life span was reduced.
And what did all the other animals do to deserve this horrible death? Sure, man has sinned. But what about the lowly shrew? The fruitbat? I could go on.
What a stupid concept. If god wanted to start again with humans, wouldn't it be far simpler to just kill everybody on the planet? Since he created them in the first place. Why the need for this elaborate watery death? Is god just some kind of sadistic maniac bond villain who likes watching people die slowly and painfully? I have so many questions.
i know why take the animals two by two thats to have new animals but how would they repopulate the earth would they have to have to interbreed with eachother
@followgood i dont know. something out there. maybe God did create us. But i dont think God would punish me or anyone else for not believing. I dont think God would just make it rain like that, if he can do that< then why dont just kill everyone?
@frank12364 Look at everything around you (material things), someone or company (and their name is on it) created it all. Now look at people, plants, the stars, sun, moon, animals, they are fascinating and something created it all, it definitely did not come from an explosion 30 billion years ago, explosions create disaster, everything is and works together perfectly, that means something perfect created it. There is only one being (God) that claims to have made it all, so why not believe him.
@followgood The problem today is we have been polluted by the media with lies and deception about aliens, evolution, the big bang. It is all to take you away from the truth, from the only one who is claiming what He has the right to. Read the article about The Great Pyramid of Giza (by: Grace by Faith) this pyramid could have only been built by who knows everything about what He created, and onto top of it He even tells us that in the book of life (The Bible).
@frank12364 Also about God, some many people answer that he is evil, murderer, sadistic,etc. That is mainly because everyone claiming that mortal life here is so valuable ( don't get me wrong, I do believe that too) but look around and look at the killing, raping, revolting things that humans do to each other, they choose to do that, not God. Now when I read the Bible I see our life as a test to pass from this mortal life to eternal life if we play as the Bible tells us, and it's nothing evil.
@gregnibiru I do mon frere. I do. For example, you might want to look into the chemical composition of the Opeche Shale. There's about 9 trillion cubic meters of salt in this one formation alone that directly rules out a global flood. Real science looks at all the data, not just little snippets here an there that support bronze age myths. Reality is a lot more interesting than the fantasy proposed here.
@northforkfisherman - just check the net about pole shitfs, its history repeating itself. Even scientist have conflicting data, don't expect 100% accuracy in a theory. that's where your opinion comes in by reading more learning more and decide which is realistic and probable.
@gregnibiru Are you talking about electromagnetic shifts? This we know about, but it's not something that could cause a global inundation. It's a much slower process than you might think. But certainly, whatever it's effects, a worldwide flood, would not be among them. There's no data to support that conjecture. Indeed, what's found is that the earth clearly shows it could not have happened.
@gregnibiru So which one is it? DID or DID NOT? You've got two comments that are contradictory (not surprising for a creationist). Remove the "errant' one and show us what studies show it was an ocean a few years ago. This is about data. All you have so far is opinion.
Rain did not cause the flooding, but the tilting of the earth it displaced waters from former oceans and seas to cites and early civilization causing tsunamis and flooding. Rain and Storm are weather anomaly during the tilting of the earth. Grand canyon is a barren land but studies shows it was a former ocean.
theres over 10million species on earth howd they all be collected, and housed on a boat let alone the toilet or food problem , when some animals can only eat certain kinds of food.
@element4008 If scientists are making up BS, don't use: computers, the Internet, electricity, cars, airplanes, televisions, X-ray machines, CD players, DVD players, ships, fax machines, copiers, cameras, or anything that runs on modern science theories.
@element4008 considering science is the study and observation of factual evidence through logic, scientists by definition cannot just sprout random theories and say that it is true. their studies have a purpose to either find technologies or facts for the benefit of mankind or conclusions that would lead to it, these conclusions are subject to be revised upon new evidence.
if all they say is bullshit, airplanes, cars, computers ect should not work as we know it is.
@element4008 by science definition also, it is entirely possible that future studies prove god (of whatever form or being) exist as a scientific fact. many scientific conclusions that endured for centuries and was accepted as general facts have been revised as new evidence are found that proved otherwise, astronomy in particular.
creationist-scientists are not true scientists because they do it the wrong way by starting with conclusion and ignoring all evidence that contradicts it.
If someone is truly open minded and interested in finding the truth, then I'll respond, but I simply don't have the time to deal with persecutors and people who hate themselves, others, and the God who created them. God bless those of you whose ears are open.
@dirtyharrycallahan1 I don't hate myself. What I hate are fundamentalists like yourself who go around spewing nonsensical, false bullshit at others, trying to get their pseudo-science taught in schools. Why don't you put down the Bible for a while and pick up a science book so you can learn about geology and why a 10000 year old Earth is impossible.
@deadshot1995 Deadshot let`s just breath aaaaaaaaaaaahhhhh that`s better. Its not surprising in a country with America`s history of tolerating religion ,that you are going to get people who think the Flintstones is a history program. Of course it is an affront to Human learning to be faced with this dribbling cretinism ,but at least all they do is talk bollocks ,and science quietly goes on its way of advancing humanity without them.
@deadshot1995 umm doesn't the bible say the earth is only like 5000 years old? thats what i believe.. santa told me so, the the easterbunny voched for him.
This documentary claims "there is no evidence of the remains of the ark on Mount Ararat." This too is totally false. In 1977, a very famous archeologist was finally allowed to do real scientific carbon dating and do some digging. He found petrified wood throughout the site covered in resin, just as the bible described. He drilled down about 10 feet into the site and found, animal dung, a wild berry, and human hair. The wood was carbon dated to more than 5,000 years old.
@dirtyharrycallahan1 You'll have to explain to me how freshwater aquatic life and coral reefs could have survived a flood that mixed the salty oceans and lakes with freshwater rivers and streams.
Also, how did plants survive being submerged under roaring, salty flood waters?
Besides, radiometric dating has already proven that the Earth is around 4.5 billion years old.
@deadshot1995 Well, with that question, it's obvious you never read the Bible. All life was destroyed by the flood, except for that which was on the Ark. So you're question is premised in ignorance, and as for radiometric dating: those methods were proven wrong after they went back and studied the life that came back after Mount St. Helens erupted in the '80s. They were amazed to find coal and other things they previously thought took billions of years to form.
So they realized that the creations view of an Earth around 10,000 years old was more accurate, and any scientist that denies that is simply looking for evidence that isn't there because they will not admit there's a God at any cost. And I'm sure you won't either. But the evidence is all around and crying out to you. I hope you don't die with your eyes blind as they are now.
@dirtyharrycallahan1 The "they" you speak of aren't even scientists, but creation-scientists, which is religion masquerading as science. You're the blind one, with all your arrogance. Isochron dating has proven that the Earth is about 4.5 billion years old, but you probably don't know a thing about isochron dating, yet you automatically reject it because it contradicts a fairytale book written in the Bronze Age.
@deadshot1995 Actually, you're wrong. You're assuming that what these people say is reflecting the Bible. The Bible does not support the global flood at all... a local, regional, yet universal flood is what people should believe. This proves my point that young-earth creationists go preaching the old earth view isn't biblically supported (but it is) and thus turn away many unbelievers because it's obvious the Earth is old.
@angryspidertv Thing is, the Bible does support a global flood. Personally, I think what happened was that the men who wrote the Bible greatly exaggerated what was in fact a regional flood. The Bible says quite clearly that "every living thing was blotted out by the flood" (other than those aboard the ark) and if the flood was local, why would birds have been sent on board? These could simply have winged across to a nearby mountain range.
@deadshot1995 Most birds would have been killed in a local flood, as many cannot fly long distances. One thing that you will notice when there is a strong rain is that birds do not fly. Flying in heavy rain is not easy. They would have sat on their perches until the water drowned them.
Visit Evidence for God from Science, it's filled with info.
@angryspidertv I just visited it.To be honest, I think it's the usual, Christian-apologetic crap that you see a lot of on the internet. I especially disagree with their calling the God of the Old Testament, Yahewh, "merciful," although we can clearly see that this is not the case. Yahweh both directly and indirectly kills tons of innocent people in the Bible, including babies. He fits the official definition of a war-criminal.
@deadshot1995 I've seen articles on that website addressing your very same issue. Search it again. search any problems you might have. I could address your comment, but come on this is youtube, I don't have the space -_- It's right there, in a link addressing God's character. I literally have it on another tab. You need to do a more detailed analysis of all the supportable evidence before coming to people with criticizing remarks :)
@angryspidertv Actually I have seen all the apologist-Christian stuff. Sorry, but I don't think you can defend mass murder with "they were all evil sinners who deserved to die, and look! He even spared a few of them." Maybe you can get away with saying all the adults were evil. but in my opinion, the killing of a baby (let alone, several hundred babies) is an indefensible crime. You should know, dehumanizing the enemy is a well-known tactic of psychopathic rulers.
@deadshot1995 God is the supreme ruler of the universe. He can't sin, because sin is rebellion against God. All babies and children go to heaven when they die. It seems he was doing them a favor by preventing them from becoming older and sinful and spending eternity in hell.
@angryspidertv Or, he could have spared them and allowed the Israelis to adopt them. Eternity in hell is also absurd. There is nobody who deserves eternal punishment. And if you read, he never says that the babies would go to heaven or that he was being merciful towards them, but rather expressed a very intense hatred towards them and their kin. He wasn't even so good to the Israelis, he once sent bears to brutally kill 42 children for making fun of a preacher's bald head.
@deadshot1995 Fool. Yes, why not let those that killed their parents raise them? Imagine the trouble. God is the ruler of the universe, don't say what's wrong or right for him to do. Yes, infants and children go to heaven when they die because they do not have the full capability to fully understand sin. They were not 42 children, they were young men. They were mocking the message of God. Do you seriously think they made fun of every single person with a bald head?
@angryspidertv They were babies you idiot! They wouldn't even have remembered their parents! If they were children (which seems more likely) then probably. And even if they were mocking God, is the appropriate punishment for that death? And what about the times God endorsed slavery (including sexual slavery), animal abuse, torture and ordered the burning of entire towns and the killing of all their inhabitants just because a few were worshiping other gods?
@deadshot1995 so you're saying the Israelites should have lied about their parents. Don't even tell me the trouble that would cause. And yes, you don't mock your holy creator and MAKER of you and the universe. That's wrong. That's SIN. Ever hear of that concept? Before Jesus came people had to do some pretty radical things. The Bible doesn't endorse slavery like how we think of it. I would say more on it but there isn't space. Remember, only the towns with excessive evil were destroyed.
@angryspidertv So, instead of raising them it was a better idea to brutally murder them? That doesn't qualify as "trouble?"
If you call a few people in the town worshiping other Gods "excessive evil," then you're right. I've heard all the arguments already and frankly, I think they're all bullshit. The God of the Old Testament was a war criminal by the official definition, He was a murderous, jealous, narcissistic psychopath of a deity and defending him just makes you look stupid.
@deadshot1995 I'd love to see your face during the second coming of Christ. I just explained it all to you. In fact the Israelites promised most they would stay out of their way when they passed through the lands. They weren't going to go LOOKING for trouble. Murder is unjustified killing. You can't call God unjust, as he's the sole center for what we call Just and Love. Back then people had to be very careful around themselves not to sin. I'm done with you, you're hopeless.
@angryspidertv I don't care about your myths (and that's all they are). Your desperate defense of a book full of scientific and historical falsehood and contradictions, written by bloodthirsty men from the Bronze Ages is what's hopeless.
@deadshot1995 You are a FOOL you have been telling me that all I'm doing is desperately defending a book that in your eyes is full of scientific innacuracies and historical falsehoods. Name a SINGLE contradiction. I've been pointing these things out, again and again. The Bible references the Big Bang, references the water cycle, how every star is different in composition, the earth is round, air has weight, the earth is controlled by the heavens, etc. So go ahead.
@angryspidertv First of all, the Bible also implies that the Earth is flat in several places. It also says that diseases come from demons, and mustard seeds grow into trees (they don't). A historical falsehood would be Herod killing all boys in and around Bethlehem that were two years old and under. Such a massacre would certainly have been noted by contemporary historians. Yet not even Josephus, who documented Herod's life in detail, mentioned it.
@angryspidertv 1 easy contradiction would be Judas' death. Matthew and Acts' accounts differ greatly on it. (Yes, I've heard the explanations that require addition of tons of new information and ignorance of basic syntax.
@deadshot1995 Two different purchases are involved. The word for "field" in Matthew's account is "argros", which is the usual word for field in the New Testament. The chief priests purchased this field with the 30 pieces of silver. Judas purchased a different field a "little space of place", (Greek: chorion). The money for this purchase need not have come from the 30 pieces of silver, but from money Judas had stolen from the bag. (John 12:6). The account merely states that the field was...CONT..
@deadshot1995 (CONT)merely states that the field was bought "with the reward of iniquity"without telling where the money came from."This man purchased a field" might be elliptical for the more lengthy explanation that the money Judas had obtained from the betrayal of the Master was used to purchase a field, although the actual transaction was effected by the priests. In everyday speech ellipses of this kind are used. the field purchased by Judas' money was obtained by the reward of iniquity.
@angryspidertv Both purchases were the same; they involved Potter's field which both dub, "the Field of Blood." (Acts calls it this due to Judas' bursting open in the middle while Matthew says the priests named it thus due to the fact that they bought it with blood money. Were there two fields of blood then?
@deadshot1995 No, there was only one. By comparison with the account in Matthew 27:3-8, it is evident that Judas "purchased" this field only indirectly. He threw down his blood money (the thirty pieces of silver paid him for betraying Jesus) in front of the chief priests, who used it to buy the field called Aceldama (Acts 1:19), or "the field of blood" (Matthew 27:8). He then hanged himself, apparently in the same field, but bungled the attempt, actually dying as described in this verse.
@angryspidertv The sensible reading of Acts though, is that Judas bought the field, then died. I find it hard to believe that any competent writer would be ignorant of basic syntax.
@angryspidertv The sensible reading of Acts though, is that Judas bought the field, then died. I find it hard to believe that any competent writer would be ignorant of basic syntax.
@angryspidertv I know what a lot of you "progressive creationists" do; you take the six days God took to create the universe as allegorical. You think the "days" actually stand for long periods of time. The flaws in this are:
1.It took God six, literal days to create the Earth, and he rested on the seventh.
2. Plants are created on the 3rd day, the sun is created on the 4th. How did they survive for such a long time without a sun to drive their photosynthetic process?
@deadshot1995 Heh no I think radiometric dating is accurate. I think the universe is circa 14 billion years old and the Earth was formed 4 billion years ago ^_^ ever hear of old earth creationism?
No, no, silly fundamentalist. Radiometric dating has not yet been disproved, or else the entire scientific community would not trust it. Besides, coal formation has nothing to do with isochron dating ( which was used to calculate the age of the Earth). Several meteorites were subjected to a variety of dating methods and all gave ages concordant with each other and the mainstream scientific consensus.
@dirtyharrycallahan1 Search Reasons to Believe, Answers in Creation, Evidence for God from Science, my fav. websites. PROVING that radiometric dating is accurate. PROVING the Bible gives more support for an old earth than it does for a young earth. PROVING that the LOCAL flood view is more biblically supported than yours.
There was no comet that wiped out the dinosaurs. It was the flood, and dinosaurs are described with stunning detail in the Bible in Job 42, 43, and 44.
@dirtyharrycallahan1 Don't bullshit us please. The "Behemoth" you're speaking of was not a dinosaur. It was implied a being enormous and having a "tail like a cedar," which are both traits of sauropods yes, but it also had a navel, which only mammals have, and "ate grass like an ox," which dinosaurs could not do, being utterly unequipped to eat grass.
I would urge anyone who's a skeptic about the Bible to do 2 things:
1) Read the "Case for Christ" which a book written by an atheist/skeptic and Chicago journalist who did a quest to see if he could disprove the Bible. To his dismay, he could not after digging into all the evidence. So do yourself a favor and read his findings.
2) Talk to any archeologist and you'll see that 95% of the stories and accounts written about in the Bible have been verified as described by real findings.
This documentary, as all of them from the mainstream media, is nothing but indoctrination and falsehood with the goal of leading people away from the truth. For instance, they claim here that "little or no evidence exists" to show sea creatures on all surfaces of the Earth. That is a flat out lie. The truth is that sea, coral, and ocean life fossils dominate 90% of most fossils found and they have found thousands upon thousands of sea fossils on the tops of the highest mountains in the world.
I find it funny how atheist don't believe in God but they still watch religious clips on YouTube if you think this kind of stuff is annoying then why do you watch it?
The Noah's ark/ flood myth fails from any way you attack it: geology, atmosphere, non-existent plant life to feed the animals once the flood's over, where did all the water go, gathering of animals outside of walking distance from Noah's house, death of all sea life from changed salinity, feeding all the animals on the ark, insufficient genetic diversity of any of the animal species to survive, etc.
It's just plan bullshit through and through. And a pivotal story on which Christianity's based.
@dasding110 There's sothing called faith.But you seem to lack life and a goal in your life.Plus your that stupid that you probably believe in Charles Darwin's theory(a mason,satanist).So jokes on you mate.Have a nice day and don't tell me your atheist ideeas allright?Crawl in a bush and die...
@MovingMud If you dont want to hear any opinion you gotta keep your own mouth shut, too and I have faith that humanity finally starts to use its brain. Theres something called logic. But you seem to lack an open mind.
@dasding110 Oh now you have faith don't you?You listen to the ''great minds'' of our world alltough they are on the devil's part.An believe me mate,i have more brain than you.Please don't reply with a stupid emotional thing.
I found a whole story made out of Watermarks on Our Planet using Google Earth and I found them in something else to. I just posted my latest video- I found pictures of God! I've put the story together and made a video of it to share with you. When your finished tell someone what you saw this day !! He Lives ! Come see my Channel and look at the Amazing things I've found ! I even found the Garden of Eden - come see !!
@InternetDarkLord u really believe a river would have caused that? in order to cause the depth and width of the canyons, the water had to be miles(or of great height) above the top of the canyons, creating the much needed velocity to cut the grand canyons. (this is all personal view, theory and common sense thinking,mind you, much like basic science.) Thus resulting the flow of the Colorado River. Like i said just my thoughts so don't bark at me .
@DontYouLikeMyNameXD No, the river cut down inch by inch, over millions of years. You are not citing common sense or science, erosion can be directly observed today. GO LOOK!
@DontYouLikeMyNameXD No, erosion is on ongoing process seen all over the world. You can see the Grand Canyon erode nowadays after storms. I have a better question: How can water move at all without erosion?
"u really believe a river would have caused that?"
>You know, Rhone and Nile rivers once carved similar canyons back when Mediterranean was isolated from the Atlantic and dried up. Those are found in careful geological studies, but unlike Grand canyon, they refilled.
-Time. Time caused river to carve granite&other sediments.
"in order to cause the depth and width of the canyons, the water had to be miles(or of great height) above the top of the canyons"
@DontYouLikeMyNameXD How do you explain the Layers of Rock exposed in the Grand Canyon? Bible packers are so busy worrying about how long it took to carve the canyon that they forget to study the Geology exposed. Some of the layers are wind blown sands like the Coconino Sandstone, not laid down by water. Floods don't make distinct layers of different kinds of rock in random orcer, which is what we find in nature.
When are we going win our independance from the british? We have had British Imperialist propaganda from Charles Darwin, James Smithson, Richard Dawkins and now we have to listen to some dudes with a british accent on our Discovery channel? This isn't BBC.
@InternetDarkLord Oh I like English. I like the Brits. I like thier vacuums and their muffins too. I just don't fancy thier imperialist propaganda. That bit I could do without.
@InternetDarkLord the continents were most likely together at this time as well, pangea so the waters of the flood are still here underground and above
@Patience1138 Well I do understand that. I was hoping my sarcasm was evident (if not then that was entirely my fault).
From a purely philosophical point of view it would just be much easier for bible literalists to just say God did everything and not get tied up with apologist explanantions.
I'm under no illusion about just how silly all of this is.
@arklowrockz Yeah, when serious debate devolves into pointless bickering, it does get old very quickly! Still, I enjoy debating about things that are important to me. To me, just saying "God did it" is just lazy, and it's disrespectful to the atheists that I debate. Besides, just stopping there would be no fun! :)
All the same, I apologize if the debate has become a bit nonsensical!
@smith077906 I see. No cages on the Ark. No high-protein vegetation existed back then, right? I mean, you'd know... you were there, right? Oh, & Noah HAD to take FULLY GROWN adults on it, right? 'Cos that's what you assumed didn't you? Just like he had to cut a hole in the roof for the giraffes! Now way he might have taken newly weaned cubs that were quite capable of living in a cage, (domesticated from an early age) and absolutely used to eating high protein vegetables, legumes, etc.
only recorded science is very recent Genesis talked of a three fold event...1 the windows of heaven opened (not raining by the way something very different) 2 the fountains of the deep burst open, 3) and it rained 40 days and nights...it was many things stated. ...by the way no arrogant scientist know for fact how much possible moisture exists....we don't know about the caverns which may have held lots of waters and then receeded by Gods command...silly little scientists..
A flood cannot explain the presence of marine shells on mountains for the following reasons: Floods erode mountains and deposit their sediments in valleys In many cases the fossils are in the same positions as they grow in life, not scattered as if they were redeposited by a flood Other evidence, such as fossilized tracks and burrows of marine organisms, show that the region was once under the sea. Seashells are not found in sediments that were not formerly covered by sea
@sigchaman2 Your using the "we don't need to understand it because it is in the bible therefore true" arguement. What if the bible is all a bullshit collection of bronze age fairy tales? Flood covered the mou
So tell me how did Noah take 7 days to not only gather the animals.. but find one male + female of each species to later populate the Earth. This is impossible for any human capabalities. Believe in your own way of thinking and realize what is truth.
xTnT87 14 hours ago
The World was alot different before the time of the flood duh!! Its the only way to make the story make sense..
To411u 3 days ago
@To411u Yes, only assuming everything was changed back then would make a fairy tale true.
InternetDarkLord 2 days ago in playlist Favorite videos
@InternetDarkLord Oh no it happened there's no doubt in my mind about that.. U know there enough evidence of it.. I mean petrified clams being found in mount Everest? In the Closed position? 1st of all when Clams die they open & 2nd of all soft bodies creatures just don't petrify today & in mount Everest at that? The mountain didn't exist 4,000+ years ago!! The Flood happened so quickly it killed so many critters in break neck speed! Genesis 7:11 Also u look @ The sediment on the Oceans floors.
To411u 2 days ago
@To411u Absolute nonsense! Mount Everest was formed over millions of years by tectonic plate activity pushing sedimentary rock, including fossils, slowly higher. And many kinds of strata cannot form underwater, like desert varnish. There is no evidence of Noah's Farce, the massive inbreeding that would have resulted alone shows it never happened.
InternetDarkLord 2 days ago
@InternetDarkLord It doesn't take millions of years for mountains to form thats a lie! Just like it doesn't take millions of years for things to petrify the only argument u have is time, & everyone else that believes in Evolution, trust me time doesn't solve anything if anything it makes things worse!! Yes it seems impossible to us but God can make anything possible also tell me why there are over 270 flood legends today?
To411u 2 days ago
@To411u Yes, things like mountains rising or life evolving can be directly observed today, but not cherubs or talking snakes.
Many fairy tales are very widespread, because they appeal to human nature: mermaids, sun gods, moon goddesses, living ape-men....are they all real? So why believe some over others?
InternetDarkLord 2 days ago
@InternetDarkLord Exactly!! I wouldn't go so far as saying evolving more or less ur right though.. & yes that is t rue, but there are still many things/ unexplained phenomena that occur in our world today that we do not understand, for 1 in the World trade centers the smoke & flames made abnormal images, I've seen strange shadowy figures some nights I can't fall asleep & things like poltergeist, mind control & Nephilim are real there have even been Nephilim skeletons found, Giant human remains!
To411u 2 days ago
@To411u In other words, you believe because it is absurd!
InternetDarkLord 2 days ago
@InternetDarkLord Well no not exactly.. I just believe that there are certain things that science cannot explain, & this is true.. Its still limited for the most part & may always be that way.. If this makes me a fool then so be it or carry that notion that I am, but it doesn't mean I hate u! On the contrary I would still pray for you, because I love everybody regardless of who u are or what u believe..
To411u 2 days ago
@To411u So you are gullible. I think carefully.
InternetDarkLord 1 day ago
@InternetDarkLord The supernatural & spiritual world is very real I know it, & so far from what I've been able to gather it defies all logic/ reasoning so yes a supernatural story is still very much possible I believe.
To411u 2 days ago
@To411u How do you know it?
InternetDarkLord 2 days ago
@InternetDarkLord Because theres telekinesis, ghosts/poltergeist & other unseen forces that our world does not understand & things that have power but are unseen elements, You know nobody actually sees stars!! Its scientifically true!! There so many light years away that all we see is the light emanating from them, but not its chemical composition even with the best microscope, same with air-particles in this room for example there all here but we don't see them..
To411u 2 days ago
@To411u There is evidence for stars, but not the paranormal. Are you watching the X-files too much?
InternetDarkLord 1 day ago
@InternetDarkLord Haha lol but evidence doesn't always mean u have to give up on the posibility science only knows so much & ya!! X-files is great! =D
To411u 1 day ago
@To411u I gather the X-files was too good!
InternetDarkLord 13 hours ago
As soon as this imaginary boat landed and the animals were let go, the carnivores would eat the herbivores, and then starve to death once the food supply dries up. Everything would die lol.
Kurisutian 1 week ago
Huh...and here I thought that the cross-validation of methods in chronostratigraphy, sedimentology, biochronostratigraphy, magnetochronostratigraphy, and radiometric dating had already provided substantial amounts of evidence suggesting that no such flood ever occurred....should have never gotten that useless master's degree in geology. :(
oshmunnies 1 week ago
all refuted
Caravandrums 2 weeks ago
@Caravandrums How?
InternetDarkLord 2 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
The flood actually came from a heavenly deluge or heavenly ocean. Yes their was an ocean in the sky before the flood. Genesis 7:11 says: the springs of the vast watery deep were broken open and the floodgates of the heavens were opened. notice vast watery deep, and floodgates of the heaven!
Jehovah God gives us his word the bible, please gain its understanding by drawing closer to him so that you may understand it.
darkmyzreal 2 weeks ago 4
LOL good ol scientists, the waters came from the heavens. Understand that the flood was the first time it rained. Waters was suspended in the sky, imagine looking at the sky and see a huge body of water surrounding the entire earth. scientists say that environment would be oxygen rich and life would live considerably longer yet they faild to see the signifigance of it as it relates to the flood, even life itself. Adam lived to be over 900 years, after the flood human life span was reduced.
darkmyzreal 2 weeks ago 4
And what did all the other animals do to deserve this horrible death? Sure, man has sinned. But what about the lowly shrew? The fruitbat? I could go on.
dproctor18 2 weeks ago
What a stupid concept. If god wanted to start again with humans, wouldn't it be far simpler to just kill everybody on the planet? Since he created them in the first place. Why the need for this elaborate watery death? Is god just some kind of sadistic maniac bond villain who likes watching people die slowly and painfully? I have so many questions.
dproctor18 2 weeks ago
Why would anyone even bother trying to prove such a ridiculous tale. Its exactly like going to the north pole looking for Santa.
scottclements78 2 weeks ago
i mean noah and his family have to breed with eachother
littleone2813 2 weeks ago
i know why take the animals two by two thats to have new animals but how would they repopulate the earth would they have to have to interbreed with eachother
littleone2813 2 weeks ago
"The True Story"? Huh... that's funny. So funny it's ridiculous.
tribunation 3 weeks ago
You will all see the truth very soon, I know the truth and he's coming soon to correct this ignorant world, God Bless you all.
followgood 3 weeks ago 2
@followgood and how do u know? so he just cam down here and talked to you? hoe come he didnt talk to me then? bullshit
frank12364 2 weeks ago
@frank12364 Can you please tell me who or what created you, me, the earth and the whole universe? I want to know who or what you think, thank you.
followgood 2 weeks ago
@followgood i dont know. something out there. maybe God did create us. But i dont think God would punish me or anyone else for not believing. I dont think God would just make it rain like that, if he can do that< then why dont just kill everyone?
frank12364 2 weeks ago
@frank12364 Look at everything around you (material things), someone or company (and their name is on it) created it all. Now look at people, plants, the stars, sun, moon, animals, they are fascinating and something created it all, it definitely did not come from an explosion 30 billion years ago, explosions create disaster, everything is and works together perfectly, that means something perfect created it. There is only one being (God) that claims to have made it all, so why not believe him.
followgood 2 weeks ago
@followgood The problem today is we have been polluted by the media with lies and deception about aliens, evolution, the big bang. It is all to take you away from the truth, from the only one who is claiming what He has the right to. Read the article about The Great Pyramid of Giza (by: Grace by Faith) this pyramid could have only been built by who knows everything about what He created, and onto top of it He even tells us that in the book of life (The Bible).
followgood 2 weeks ago
@frank12364 Also about God, some many people answer that he is evil, murderer, sadistic,etc. That is mainly because everyone claiming that mortal life here is so valuable ( don't get me wrong, I do believe that too) but look around and look at the killing, raping, revolting things that humans do to each other, they choose to do that, not God. Now when I read the Bible I see our life as a test to pass from this mortal life to eternal life if we play as the Bible tells us, and it's nothing evil.
followgood 2 weeks ago
i lovely the forgothen in the drinks in the watch, for ever alon togheter
josecmanini11 3 weeks ago
these scientists are idiots lol
MrChannel5news 3 weeks ago
when r people going to understand that the bible its just a book written by man, no doubt is a really good book but no more than just a book !
Skaterwar81 4 weeks ago
Wont argue with you research more.
gregnibiru 1 month ago
@gregnibiru I do mon frere. I do. For example, you might want to look into the chemical composition of the Opeche Shale. There's about 9 trillion cubic meters of salt in this one formation alone that directly rules out a global flood. Real science looks at all the data, not just little snippets here an there that support bronze age myths. Reality is a lot more interesting than the fantasy proposed here.
NorthForkFisherman 1 month ago
@northforkfisherman - no need to go far search the web, there have been clues on instant poleshift related with planet alignments anf solar flares.
gregnibiru 1 month ago
@northforkfisherman - just check the net about pole shitfs, its history repeating itself. Even scientist have conflicting data, don't expect 100% accuracy in a theory. that's where your opinion comes in by reading more learning more and decide which is realistic and probable.
gregnibiru 1 month ago
@gregnibiru Are you talking about electromagnetic shifts? This we know about, but it's not something that could cause a global inundation. It's a much slower process than you might think. But certainly, whatever it's effects, a worldwide flood, would not be among them. There's no data to support that conjecture. Indeed, what's found is that the earth clearly shows it could not have happened.
NorthForkFisherman 1 month ago
poleshift's cause the global floods,but don't expect to learn this in school -learn it from the ancient's stories and live with it- shit happens .
rorypebs 1 month ago
@rorypebs There were no global floods. As far as "pole shifts"? Citation please, and be prepared to show your work.
NorthForkFisherman 1 month ago
Comment removed
gregnibiru 1 month ago
@gregnibiru The Grand Canyon was a sea floor millions of years ago, and the Imaginary Flood never happened.
InternetDarkLord 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
@gregnibiru So which one is it? DID or DID NOT? You've got two comments that are contradictory (not surprising for a creationist). Remove the "errant' one and show us what studies show it was an ocean a few years ago. This is about data. All you have so far is opinion.
NorthForkFisherman 1 month ago
@NorthForkFisherman - Thanks already deleted the errant comment.
gregnibiru 1 month ago
Rain did not cause the flooding, but the tilting of the earth it displaced waters from former oceans and seas to cites and early civilization causing tsunamis and flooding. Rain and Storm are weather anomaly during the tilting of the earth. Grand canyon is a barren land but studies shows it was a former ocean.
gregnibiru 1 month ago
@gregnibiru Pure nonsense, and not even what the Bible says anyway.
InternetDarkLord 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
@gregnibiru If there was ever a year-long global flood, almost all plant life would certainly have been killed as well as all coral reefs.
deadshot1995 1 month ago
Noah never existed. It's all bullshit. Religion is bullshit. The end.
MrJohndl 1 month ago
You left something, or should I say someone, very important out of the equation. God.
390fe390 1 month ago
theres over 10million species on earth howd they all be collected, and housed on a boat let alone the toilet or food problem , when some animals can only eat certain kinds of food.
sajakram1 1 month ago
wtf do humans know about the world what if scientist are making up a bunch of bullshit..........just saying.
element4008 1 month ago
@element4008 If scientists are making up BS, don't use: computers, the Internet, electricity, cars, airplanes, televisions, X-ray machines, CD players, DVD players, ships, fax machines, copiers, cameras, or anything that runs on modern science theories.
InternetDarkLord 1 month ago
@element4008 considering science is the study and observation of factual evidence through logic, scientists by definition cannot just sprout random theories and say that it is true. their studies have a purpose to either find technologies or facts for the benefit of mankind or conclusions that would lead to it, these conclusions are subject to be revised upon new evidence.
if all they say is bullshit, airplanes, cars, computers ect should not work as we know it is.
penitent2401 1 month ago
@element4008 by science definition also, it is entirely possible that future studies prove god (of whatever form or being) exist as a scientific fact. many scientific conclusions that endured for centuries and was accepted as general facts have been revised as new evidence are found that proved otherwise, astronomy in particular.
creationist-scientists are not true scientists because they do it the wrong way by starting with conclusion and ignoring all evidence that contradicts it.
penitent2401 1 month ago
If someone is truly open minded and interested in finding the truth, then I'll respond, but I simply don't have the time to deal with persecutors and people who hate themselves, others, and the God who created them. God bless those of you whose ears are open.
dirtyharrycallahan1 1 month ago
@dirtyharrycallahan1 I don't hate myself. What I hate are fundamentalists like yourself who go around spewing nonsensical, false bullshit at others, trying to get their pseudo-science taught in schools. Why don't you put down the Bible for a while and pick up a science book so you can learn about geology and why a 10000 year old Earth is impossible.
deadshot1995 1 month ago 8
@deadshot1995 Deadshot let`s just breath aaaaaaaaaaaahhhhh that`s better. Its not surprising in a country with America`s history of tolerating religion ,that you are going to get people who think the Flintstones is a history program. Of course it is an affront to Human learning to be faced with this dribbling cretinism ,but at least all they do is talk bollocks ,and science quietly goes on its way of advancing humanity without them.
ilikezappa 1 month ago
@deadshot1995 umm doesn't the bible say the earth is only like 5000 years old? thats what i believe.. santa told me so, the the easterbunny voched for him.
699DSON 1 month ago
This documentary claims "there is no evidence of the remains of the ark on Mount Ararat." This too is totally false. In 1977, a very famous archeologist was finally allowed to do real scientific carbon dating and do some digging. He found petrified wood throughout the site covered in resin, just as the bible described. He drilled down about 10 feet into the site and found, animal dung, a wild berry, and human hair. The wood was carbon dated to more than 5,000 years old.
dirtyharrycallahan1 2 months ago
@dirtyharrycallahan1 Pure hogwash, that does not even prove it was a boat, nor does the Bible mention Mount Ararat.
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
@dirtyharrycallahan1 You'll have to explain to me how freshwater aquatic life and coral reefs could have survived a flood that mixed the salty oceans and lakes with freshwater rivers and streams.
Also, how did plants survive being submerged under roaring, salty flood waters?
Besides, radiometric dating has already proven that the Earth is around 4.5 billion years old.
deadshot1995 1 month ago
@deadshot1995 Well, with that question, it's obvious you never read the Bible. All life was destroyed by the flood, except for that which was on the Ark. So you're question is premised in ignorance, and as for radiometric dating: those methods were proven wrong after they went back and studied the life that came back after Mount St. Helens erupted in the '80s. They were amazed to find coal and other things they previously thought took billions of years to form.
dirtyharrycallahan1 1 month ago
So they realized that the creations view of an Earth around 10,000 years old was more accurate, and any scientist that denies that is simply looking for evidence that isn't there because they will not admit there's a God at any cost. And I'm sure you won't either. But the evidence is all around and crying out to you. I hope you don't die with your eyes blind as they are now.
dirtyharrycallahan1 1 month ago
@dirtyharrycallahan1 The "they" you speak of aren't even scientists, but creation-scientists, which is religion masquerading as science. You're the blind one, with all your arrogance. Isochron dating has proven that the Earth is about 4.5 billion years old, but you probably don't know a thing about isochron dating, yet you automatically reject it because it contradicts a fairytale book written in the Bronze Age.
deadshot1995 1 month ago 11
@deadshot1995 Actually, you're wrong. You're assuming that what these people say is reflecting the Bible. The Bible does not support the global flood at all... a local, regional, yet universal flood is what people should believe. This proves my point that young-earth creationists go preaching the old earth view isn't biblically supported (but it is) and thus turn away many unbelievers because it's obvious the Earth is old.
angryspidertv 1 month ago
@angryspidertv Thing is, the Bible does support a global flood. Personally, I think what happened was that the men who wrote the Bible greatly exaggerated what was in fact a regional flood. The Bible says quite clearly that "every living thing was blotted out by the flood" (other than those aboard the ark) and if the flood was local, why would birds have been sent on board? These could simply have winged across to a nearby mountain range.
deadshot1995 1 month ago
@deadshot1995 Most birds would have been killed in a local flood, as many cannot fly long distances. One thing that you will notice when there is a strong rain is that birds do not fly. Flying in heavy rain is not easy. They would have sat on their perches until the water drowned them.
Visit Evidence for God from Science, it's filled with info.
angryspidertv 1 month ago 2
@angryspidertv I just visited it.To be honest, I think it's the usual, Christian-apologetic crap that you see a lot of on the internet. I especially disagree with their calling the God of the Old Testament, Yahewh, "merciful," although we can clearly see that this is not the case. Yahweh both directly and indirectly kills tons of innocent people in the Bible, including babies. He fits the official definition of a war-criminal.
deadshot1995 1 month ago
@deadshot1995 I've seen articles on that website addressing your very same issue. Search it again. search any problems you might have. I could address your comment, but come on this is youtube, I don't have the space -_- It's right there, in a link addressing God's character. I literally have it on another tab. You need to do a more detailed analysis of all the supportable evidence before coming to people with criticizing remarks :)
angryspidertv 4 weeks ago
@angryspidertv Actually I have seen all the apologist-Christian stuff. Sorry, but I don't think you can defend mass murder with "they were all evil sinners who deserved to die, and look! He even spared a few of them." Maybe you can get away with saying all the adults were evil. but in my opinion, the killing of a baby (let alone, several hundred babies) is an indefensible crime. You should know, dehumanizing the enemy is a well-known tactic of psychopathic rulers.
deadshot1995 4 weeks ago
@deadshot1995 God is the supreme ruler of the universe. He can't sin, because sin is rebellion against God. All babies and children go to heaven when they die. It seems he was doing them a favor by preventing them from becoming older and sinful and spending eternity in hell.
angryspidertv 3 weeks ago
@angryspidertv Or, he could have spared them and allowed the Israelis to adopt them. Eternity in hell is also absurd. There is nobody who deserves eternal punishment. And if you read, he never says that the babies would go to heaven or that he was being merciful towards them, but rather expressed a very intense hatred towards them and their kin. He wasn't even so good to the Israelis, he once sent bears to brutally kill 42 children for making fun of a preacher's bald head.
deadshot1995 3 weeks ago
@deadshot1995 Fool. Yes, why not let those that killed their parents raise them? Imagine the trouble. God is the ruler of the universe, don't say what's wrong or right for him to do. Yes, infants and children go to heaven when they die because they do not have the full capability to fully understand sin. They were not 42 children, they were young men. They were mocking the message of God. Do you seriously think they made fun of every single person with a bald head?
angryspidertv 3 weeks ago
@angryspidertv They were babies you idiot! They wouldn't even have remembered their parents! If they were children (which seems more likely) then probably. And even if they were mocking God, is the appropriate punishment for that death? And what about the times God endorsed slavery (including sexual slavery), animal abuse, torture and ordered the burning of entire towns and the killing of all their inhabitants just because a few were worshiping other gods?
deadshot1995 3 weeks ago
@deadshot1995 so you're saying the Israelites should have lied about their parents. Don't even tell me the trouble that would cause. And yes, you don't mock your holy creator and MAKER of you and the universe. That's wrong. That's SIN. Ever hear of that concept? Before Jesus came people had to do some pretty radical things. The Bible doesn't endorse slavery like how we think of it. I would say more on it but there isn't space. Remember, only the towns with excessive evil were destroyed.
angryspidertv 3 weeks ago
@angryspidertv So, instead of raising them it was a better idea to brutally murder them? That doesn't qualify as "trouble?"
If you call a few people in the town worshiping other Gods "excessive evil," then you're right. I've heard all the arguments already and frankly, I think they're all bullshit. The God of the Old Testament was a war criminal by the official definition, He was a murderous, jealous, narcissistic psychopath of a deity and defending him just makes you look stupid.
deadshot1995 3 weeks ago
@deadshot1995 I'd love to see your face during the second coming of Christ. I just explained it all to you. In fact the Israelites promised most they would stay out of their way when they passed through the lands. They weren't going to go LOOKING for trouble. Murder is unjustified killing. You can't call God unjust, as he's the sole center for what we call Just and Love. Back then people had to be very careful around themselves not to sin. I'm done with you, you're hopeless.
angryspidertv 3 weeks ago
@angryspidertv I don't care about your myths (and that's all they are). Your desperate defense of a book full of scientific and historical falsehood and contradictions, written by bloodthirsty men from the Bronze Ages is what's hopeless.
deadshot1995 3 weeks ago
@deadshot1995 You are a FOOL you have been telling me that all I'm doing is desperately defending a book that in your eyes is full of scientific innacuracies and historical falsehoods. Name a SINGLE contradiction. I've been pointing these things out, again and again. The Bible references the Big Bang, references the water cycle, how every star is different in composition, the earth is round, air has weight, the earth is controlled by the heavens, etc. So go ahead.
angryspidertv 3 weeks ago
@angryspidertv First of all, the Bible also implies that the Earth is flat in several places. It also says that diseases come from demons, and mustard seeds grow into trees (they don't). A historical falsehood would be Herod killing all boys in and around Bethlehem that were two years old and under. Such a massacre would certainly have been noted by contemporary historians. Yet not even Josephus, who documented Herod's life in detail, mentioned it.
deadshot1995 3 weeks ago
@angryspidertv 1 easy contradiction would be Judas' death. Matthew and Acts' accounts differ greatly on it. (Yes, I've heard the explanations that require addition of tons of new information and ignorance of basic syntax.
deadshot1995 3 weeks ago
@deadshot1995 Two different purchases are involved. The word for "field" in Matthew's account is "argros", which is the usual word for field in the New Testament. The chief priests purchased this field with the 30 pieces of silver. Judas purchased a different field a "little space of place", (Greek: chorion). The money for this purchase need not have come from the 30 pieces of silver, but from money Judas had stolen from the bag. (John 12:6). The account merely states that the field was...CONT..
angryspidertv 3 weeks ago
@deadshot1995 (CONT)merely states that the field was bought "with the reward of iniquity"without telling where the money came from."This man purchased a field" might be elliptical for the more lengthy explanation that the money Judas had obtained from the betrayal of the Master was used to purchase a field, although the actual transaction was effected by the priests. In everyday speech ellipses of this kind are used. the field purchased by Judas' money was obtained by the reward of iniquity.
angryspidertv 3 weeks ago
@angryspidertv Both purchases were the same; they involved Potter's field which both dub, "the Field of Blood." (Acts calls it this due to Judas' bursting open in the middle while Matthew says the priests named it thus due to the fact that they bought it with blood money. Were there two fields of blood then?
deadshot1995 3 weeks ago
@deadshot1995 No, there was only one. By comparison with the account in Matthew 27:3-8, it is evident that Judas "purchased" this field only indirectly. He threw down his blood money (the thirty pieces of silver paid him for betraying Jesus) in front of the chief priests, who used it to buy the field called Aceldama (Acts 1:19), or "the field of blood" (Matthew 27:8). He then hanged himself, apparently in the same field, but bungled the attempt, actually dying as described in this verse.
angryspidertv 3 weeks ago
@angryspidertv The sensible reading of Acts though, is that Judas bought the field, then died. I find it hard to believe that any competent writer would be ignorant of basic syntax.
deadshot1995 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@angryspidertv The sensible reading of Acts though, is that Judas bought the field, then died. I find it hard to believe that any competent writer would be ignorant of basic syntax.
deadshot1995 3 weeks ago
@angryspidertv I know what a lot of you "progressive creationists" do; you take the six days God took to create the universe as allegorical. You think the "days" actually stand for long periods of time. The flaws in this are:
1.It took God six, literal days to create the Earth, and he rested on the seventh.
2. Plants are created on the 3rd day, the sun is created on the 4th. How did they survive for such a long time without a sun to drive their photosynthetic process?
deadshot1995 4 weeks ago
@deadshot1995 Heh no I think radiometric dating is accurate. I think the universe is circa 14 billion years old and the Earth was formed 4 billion years ago ^_^ ever hear of old earth creationism?
angryspidertv 4 weeks ago
@dirtyharrycallahan1 So then how do we have fish? How do we have plants?
No, no, silly fundamentalist. Radiometric dating has not yet been disproved, or else the entire scientific community would not trust it. Besides, coal formation has nothing to do with isochron dating ( which was used to calculate the age of the Earth). Several meteorites were subjected to a variety of dating methods and all gave ages concordant with each other and the mainstream scientific consensus.
deadshot1995 1 month ago 2
@dirtyharrycallahan1 Search Reasons to Believe, Answers in Creation, Evidence for God from Science, my fav. websites. PROVING that radiometric dating is accurate. PROVING the Bible gives more support for an old earth than it does for a young earth. PROVING that the LOCAL flood view is more biblically supported than yours.
angryspidertv 1 month ago
There was no comet that wiped out the dinosaurs. It was the flood, and dinosaurs are described with stunning detail in the Bible in Job 42, 43, and 44.
dirtyharrycallahan1 2 months ago
@dirtyharrycallahan1 Nonsense, that is a vague description of fairy tale dragons or whatever.
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
@dirtyharrycallahan1 Don't bullshit us please. The "Behemoth" you're speaking of was not a dinosaur. It was implied a being enormous and having a "tail like a cedar," which are both traits of sauropods yes, but it also had a navel, which only mammals have, and "ate grass like an ox," which dinosaurs could not do, being utterly unequipped to eat grass.
deadshot1995 1 month ago
I would urge anyone who's a skeptic about the Bible to do 2 things:
1) Read the "Case for Christ" which a book written by an atheist/skeptic and Chicago journalist who did a quest to see if he could disprove the Bible. To his dismay, he could not after digging into all the evidence. So do yourself a favor and read his findings.
2) Talk to any archeologist and you'll see that 95% of the stories and accounts written about in the Bible have been verified as described by real findings.
dirtyharrycallahan1 2 months ago
@dirtyharrycallahan1 Pure nonsense. Even a majority of Christians are nonliteralist, ask a Harvard theologian.
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
This documentary, as all of them from the mainstream media, is nothing but indoctrination and falsehood with the goal of leading people away from the truth. For instance, they claim here that "little or no evidence exists" to show sea creatures on all surfaces of the Earth. That is a flat out lie. The truth is that sea, coral, and ocean life fossils dominate 90% of most fossils found and they have found thousands upon thousands of sea fossils on the tops of the highest mountains in the world.
dirtyharrycallahan1 2 months ago
@dirtyharrycallahan1 Read a geology book, rock formation and mountain formation were explained decades ago!
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
i dont beleve in god what so ever but how the fuck do you know how much waters in the rocks and ocean lying cunts
tjb2k8 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I find it funny how atheist don't believe in God but they still watch religious clips on YouTube if you think this kind of stuff is annoying then why do you watch it?
bobcatallstar7 2 months ago
The Noah's ark/ flood myth fails from any way you attack it: geology, atmosphere, non-existent plant life to feed the animals once the flood's over, where did all the water go, gathering of animals outside of walking distance from Noah's house, death of all sea life from changed salinity, feeding all the animals on the ark, insufficient genetic diversity of any of the animal species to survive, etc.
It's just plan bullshit through and through. And a pivotal story on which Christianity's based.
ChipArgyle 2 months ago
If two lions can eat all the animals in the ark then why did't eat also the humans in the ark but lion can't eat the crocodiles.
MrOtak0 2 months ago
I don't understand 1 thing...Why are they seeking scientific proof of a God's act?That's magic,unknown to us humans,Done by His will.
MovingMud 2 months ago
@MovingMud Nice argument.
A: ''Why?''
You: ''Because.''
dasding110 2 months ago
@dasding110 What did you said?I'm sorry but you wrote just 6 words...I don't get it.
MovingMud 2 months ago
@MovingMud I tried to show you that your argument isnt an argument at all.
I will give you another example:
A:''I dont get why 1 + 1 equals 2.''
You:''Its magic unknown to us humans, done by his will.''
dasding110 2 months ago
@dasding110 Your an idiot you know that?
MovingMud 2 months ago
@MovingMud Youre just mad, that you cant proof your shit.
dasding110 2 months ago
@dasding110 Well if it's shit then I guess nothing will happen.But if it's real send me a picture from hell.
MovingMud 2 months ago
@MovingMud You just explained why you believe in that crap. Just because youre scared because of hell. Guess why it was invented. Derp.
dasding110 2 months ago
@dasding110 There's sothing called faith.But you seem to lack life and a goal in your life.Plus your that stupid that you probably believe in Charles Darwin's theory(a mason,satanist).So jokes on you mate.Have a nice day and don't tell me your atheist ideeas allright?Crawl in a bush and die...
MovingMud 2 months ago
@MovingMud If you dont want to hear any opinion you gotta keep your own mouth shut, too and I have faith that humanity finally starts to use its brain. Theres something called logic. But you seem to lack an open mind.
dasding110 2 months ago
@dasding110 Oh now you have faith don't you?You listen to the ''great minds'' of our world alltough they are on the devil's part.An believe me mate,i have more brain than you.Please don't reply with a stupid emotional thing.
MovingMud 2 months ago
@MovingMud Your face is on the devils part. You should rip it off. Btw: Having a brain is a sin.
dasding110 2 months ago
@dasding110 Now you are just becoming arogant,telling me physical isults.Please do try again and better this time.
MovingMud 2 months ago
@MovingMud Just playing on your level.
dasding110 2 months ago
@dasding110 Not even at half of it mate..
MovingMud 2 months ago
@MovingMud If magic and unicorns were real. Maybe.
dasding110 2 months ago
@dasding110 Your mother must be so proud!!
MovingMud 2 months ago
When white people just gone give it up smh the world not buying it any more
83leaf 2 months ago
@83leaf Are you drunk?
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
@InternetDarkLord noticing plagiarism of biblical stories can't b a sign of druckness
83leaf 2 months ago
@83leaf That's OK, I am a little drunk tonight. 3 more rounds and creationism will make sense!
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I found a whole story made out of Watermarks on Our Planet using Google Earth and I found them in something else to. I just posted my latest video- I found pictures of God! I've put the story together and made a video of it to share with you. When your finished tell someone what you saw this day !! He Lives ! Come see my Channel and look at the Amazing things I've found ! I even found the Garden of Eden - come see !!
downyourtube 2 months ago
so how do you explain the Grand Canyon?
DontYouLikeMyNameXD 2 months ago
@DontYouLikeMyNameXD and why are they *digging up* cities? (huge cities too) and also digging up pyramids.
DontYouLikeMyNameXD 2 months ago
@DontYouLikeMyNameXD Ever heard of the Colorado River?
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
@InternetDarkLord u really believe a river would have caused that? in order to cause the depth and width of the canyons, the water had to be miles(or of great height) above the top of the canyons, creating the much needed velocity to cut the grand canyons. (this is all personal view, theory and common sense thinking,mind you, much like basic science.) Thus resulting the flow of the Colorado River. Like i said just my thoughts so don't bark at me .
DontYouLikeMyNameXD 2 months ago
@DontYouLikeMyNameXD No, the river cut down inch by inch, over millions of years. You are not citing common sense or science, erosion can be directly observed today. GO LOOK!
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
@InternetDarkLord ok. but in order for a river to erode to that depth, wouldn't have to moving rather fast?
DontYouLikeMyNameXD 2 months ago
@DontYouLikeMyNameXD No, erosion is on ongoing process seen all over the world. You can see the Grand Canyon erode nowadays after storms. I have a better question: How can water move at all without erosion?
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
@DontYouLikeMyNameXD
"u really believe a river would have caused that?"
>You know, Rhone and Nile rivers once carved similar canyons back when Mediterranean was isolated from the Atlantic and dried up. Those are found in careful geological studies, but unlike Grand canyon, they refilled.
-Time. Time caused river to carve granite&other sediments.
"in order to cause the depth and width of the canyons, the water had to be miles(or of great height) above the top of the canyons"
>????whatta...
ArmaFennica 2 months ago 2
@DontYouLikeMyNameXD
"creating the much needed velocity to cut the grand canyons."
>You have the issue of not comprehending time. River can flow as always, and carve up even the hardest of rocks.
"(this is all personal view, theory and common sense thinking,mind you, much like basic science.)"
>Basic science is NOT like that... except when it comes to bible-humping creationists.
"Like i said just my thoughts so don't bark at me"
>If you'd look at the data, you'd know. Bark.
ArmaFennica 2 months ago
@DontYouLikeMyNameXD How do you explain the Layers of Rock exposed in the Grand Canyon? Bible packers are so busy worrying about how long it took to carve the canyon that they forget to study the Geology exposed. Some of the layers are wind blown sands like the Coconino Sandstone, not laid down by water. Floods don't make distinct layers of different kinds of rock in random orcer, which is what we find in nature.
gregrutz 2 months ago 2
Not all story told in the bible are real...
fadidavedp21 2 months ago
When are we going win our independance from the british? We have had British Imperialist propaganda from Charles Darwin, James Smithson, Richard Dawkins and now we have to listen to some dudes with a british accent on our Discovery channel? This isn't BBC.
bradyspace 2 months ago
@bradyspace Oh and I forgot Sir Charles Lyell, the original British Imperial propagandist.
bradyspace 2 months ago
@bradyspace So why are you speaking English?
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Oh I like English. I like the Brits. I like thier vacuums and their muffins too. I just don't fancy thier imperialist propaganda. That bit I could do without.
bradyspace 2 months ago
@bradyspace Thinking is not imperialism, although here in America, people confuse the 2.
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
@InternetDarkLord the continents were most likely together at this time as well, pangea so the waters of the flood are still here underground and above
MrTannerBear 3 months ago
@MrTannerBear Pangea was 200 million years ago, nor was it ever underwater.
InternetDarkLord 3 months ago
Fucken hell, why not just say "God did it". It would be so much easier. Why bother with explanantions?? God did it, end of story.
arklowrockz 3 months ago
@arklowrockz That's not very scientific... kinda lazy...
Patience1138 3 months ago
@Patience1138 Well I do understand that. I was hoping my sarcasm was evident (if not then that was entirely my fault).
From a purely philosophical point of view it would just be much easier for bible literalists to just say God did everything and not get tied up with apologist explanantions.
I'm under no illusion about just how silly all of this is.
:)
arklowrockz 3 months ago
@arklowrockz Yeah, when serious debate devolves into pointless bickering, it does get old very quickly! Still, I enjoy debating about things that are important to me. To me, just saying "God did it" is just lazy, and it's disrespectful to the atheists that I debate. Besides, just stopping there would be no fun! :)
All the same, I apologize if the debate has become a bit nonsensical!
Patience1138 3 months ago
@arklowrockz All the same, I'm off to go listen to some SID while I do homework. Have fun!
Patience1138 3 months ago
ancient aliens makes more sense then the the story of the Ark...lol
RSTcreatives 3 months ago
The 2 Lions eat all the animals on the ark!
smith077906 3 months ago 4
@smith077906 That's why you get baby lions.
CorrespondingReality 3 months ago
@smith077906 They were all little toddlers
6630mcdo 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@smith077906
"The 2 Lions eat all the animals on the ark! "
According to this logic when you visit a zoo only lions should remain.
The archilogical site of the ark has anchors, cages, and everything needed. Ignorance sucks huh
truthseeker010101 2 months ago
@smith077906 HA HA HA HA HA........you are a complete, absolute idiot.
thugthumper1 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
@smith077906 No, bcoz they was young , small and sleep
CEMEH1980 2 months ago
@smith077906 I see. No cages on the Ark. No high-protein vegetation existed back then, right? I mean, you'd know... you were there, right? Oh, & Noah HAD to take FULLY GROWN adults on it, right? 'Cos that's what you assumed didn't you? Just like he had to cut a hole in the roof for the giraffes! Now way he might have taken newly weaned cubs that were quite capable of living in a cage, (domesticated from an early age) and absolutely used to eating high protein vegetables, legumes, etc.
Countrygent100 2 months ago
im going to add this to an amazing collection playlist-ThingsYouHavntLearned
cfapps7865 3 months ago
if god is so loving and forgives every thing why did he drown every body?
guayacan07 3 months ago
only recorded science is very recent Genesis talked of a three fold event...1 the windows of heaven opened (not raining by the way something very different) 2 the fountains of the deep burst open, 3) and it rained 40 days and nights...it was many things stated. ...by the way no arrogant scientist know for fact how much possible moisture exists....we don't know about the caverns which may have held lots of waters and then receeded by Gods command...silly little scientists..
1927Norma 3 months ago
I keep waiting for the narrator to say, "You guys are wrong, get over it."
shagoosty 3 months ago
@InternetDarkLord, shark tooth mountain? And other mountains inland that have marine fossils?
MrTannerBear 3 months ago
@MrTannerBear Sediment deposited underwater, then tectonic movement pushed the mountains up millions of years later. READ a geology book!
InternetDarkLord 3 months ago
A flood cannot explain the presence of marine shells on mountains for the following reasons: Floods erode mountains and deposit their sediments in valleys In many cases the fossils are in the same positions as they grow in life, not scattered as if they were redeposited by a flood Other evidence, such as fossilized tracks and burrows of marine organisms, show that the region was once under the sea. Seashells are not found in sediments that were not formerly covered by sea
TalkOrigins. org CC364
Raptor302 3 months ago
the lord made the earth out of nothing whats so hard to beleive that he made enough wter to flood the earth
sigchaman2 3 months ago
@sigchaman2 If the Lord is so powerful, why have a flood at all? He had plenty of options.
InternetDarkLord 3 months ago
@sigchaman2 Your using the "we don't need to understand it because it is in the bible therefore true" arguement. What if the bible is all a bullshit collection of bronze age fairy tales? Flood covered the mou