You need to turn that music up about 4 more notches to make this vid better . Great tunes dude ! Let her rip Batman . PS I hope you got some ventilation , CO sticks to the red haemoglobin cell until it dies ( six weeks ).
I like your demonstration videobut I think you should can the background music...it's awfully distracting....you can drive your point home much more clearly without the noise that overrides your voice and intention to educate....just what are you saying...I cant hear you
yes, it can be done. there are modifications that have to be made to the carburator. the best way to do this is with 2 - 100 watt solar panels, 4 dc marine batteries, 1 large fuel cell, 1 - 200 amp battery charger, 1 - 6,000 watt generator. to find out more, check out our website at highperformancefuelcells
I don't disagree with your math. The problem with extrapolating to much larger values based on tiny amounts tested is that the errors also extrapolate.
I think that if you ran the full gallon of gas, you would probably find that it won't reach the calculated 26,419 seconds (7 hours and 20 minutes)
I am sure you will have a significantly longer run time, but not to the extrapolated value.
Thank you! We actually did try different timed tests, the error margin was very small <3%. This was just the best lenght test to post up, as the time we have to run is limited - also who wants to watch a generator run for that long on you tube? We will make sure to mention it next time - thanks for the tip!
Hi Andy, Oh this was 10 months ago. I am not sure I remember what I was thinking at the time. :)
I believe what I was meaning that when you do tests with such small volumes of fuel that when you estimate the time that a device "should have run" that the promises sometimes don't meet the hype of the calculated values.
I have a tendency to prefer longer runs to validate that my calculated values are really on target.
I was basically saying 'be careful what you promise :)"
You need to turn that music up about 4 more notches to make this vid better . Great tunes dude ! Let her rip Batman . PS I hope you got some ventilation , CO sticks to the red haemoglobin cell until it dies ( six weeks ).
Bubblytubebob 2 weeks ago
kill the music we need clearity, we should all have more options than just government oil & power. so please be more serious. thx
klydekool 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is possible to run a car just on HHO, I have almost successfully done it, u can watch my first video just by clicking on pieterdavison
PieterDavison 3 weeks ago
I like your demonstration videobut I think you should can the background music...it's awfully distracting....you can drive your point home much more clearly without the noise that overrides your voice and intention to educate....just what are you saying...I cant hear you
Hydrogeniz4US 2 months ago
Hardcore video dude
VicJLo 1 year ago
@VicJLo
Thank you for your comment. We are working hard at this technology. We will be posting new videos soon!
BackyardBuilders 4 months ago
i think, you can run one of those generators with only hho. there is a video with 2 big cells powering a 5.8kw
VaMPiRiTz 2 years ago
@VaMPiRiTz
yes, it can be done. there are modifications that have to be made to the carburator. the best way to do this is with 2 - 100 watt solar panels, 4 dc marine batteries, 1 large fuel cell, 1 - 200 amp battery charger, 1 - 6,000 watt generator. to find out more, check out our website at highperformancefuelcells
BackyardBuilders 4 months ago
test proceedure looks good, can't wait for data.
d3adp001 3 years ago
I don't disagree with your math. The problem with extrapolating to much larger values based on tiny amounts tested is that the errors also extrapolate.
I think that if you ran the full gallon of gas, you would probably find that it won't reach the calculated 26,419 seconds (7 hours and 20 minutes)
I am sure you will have a significantly longer run time, but not to the extrapolated value.
Very good demonstration. Keep up to good work.
lutherp40 3 years ago
Thank you! We actually did try different timed tests, the error margin was very small <3%. This was just the best lenght test to post up, as the time we have to run is limited - also who wants to watch a generator run for that long on you tube? We will make sure to mention it next time - thanks for the tip!
BackyardBuilders 3 years ago
Very true. Watching a generator run for 8 hours straight would not be one of my more 'enjoyable' experiences. :)
Maybe 45 seconds real time at the beginning 45 seconds real time at the end and 30 to 60 seconds of time lapse to cover the remaining 7 hours.
This is only a suggestion. Don't do any of it on my account. :)
I've yet to figure out how to do time lapse myself, so I shouldn't be asking someone else to do it if I can't do it myself. :)))
lutherp40 3 years ago
hi there lutherp you have really pricked my ears up with the statement about extrapolated values.
i do not understand what this means and an explanation would not be wasted on me.
can you please elaborate? regards andy
kissmyhho 3 years ago
Hi Andy, Oh this was 10 months ago. I am not sure I remember what I was thinking at the time. :)
I believe what I was meaning that when you do tests with such small volumes of fuel that when you estimate the time that a device "should have run" that the promises sometimes don't meet the hype of the calculated values.
I have a tendency to prefer longer runs to validate that my calculated values are really on target.
I was basically saying 'be careful what you promise :)"
lutherp40 2 years ago