Added: 3 years ago
From: OutcastUNO
Views: 166,231
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,757)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The reason y it took 39 times is because nbc paused the video at tht shot during the commentary

  • Wait...was that aerial footage of the plane hitting the building real? Or just a digitalized production?

  • the most gaurded heavily defended building inthe solar system - with the ground to air capabilities able shread into powder any aircraft at 50 miles - the 19 so-call high jackers - are not near as interesting as the 19 top brass that stood down

  • explosion too small - doesnt show airplane actually rise over building as missile slips under trajectory therfore doesnt show what pentagon eye witnesses report - plane seen flying over top and leaving area

  • 1Gateway That is not how federal and military operations work. Any enlisted solider WITHOUT security clearance could tell you the U.S government have some of the tightest and most efficient federal and military operations in the world, to protect the both the political and militaristic interests of America both on and off soil. The building in question, was and is, not only one of the most guarded buildings in the world, but continues to hold the densest surveillance of any building.

  • The footage from the Helicopter says it was a missile 100%

  • I don't know how you can call it a fuselage?

  • 4:31 that's a truck haha

  • And they say Elvis is alive!

  • That is pretty crazy about how he hits the arrows 39 times like that... clearly its missing frames.... hmm... thats really weird

  • Actually the buildings and trees in the background aren't to scale.

  • IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE FOOTAGE YOU SHOW AT 4:55 OF THE MISSILE HITTING THE PENTAGON IS 100% CONFIRMED FAKE. DO A GOOGLE SEARCH FOR "35mm Stock Footage of Washington DC aerials also availabe in High Definition". SOMEONE USED OLD STOCK PENTAGON FOOTAGE AND CGI'D IN THE MISSILE.

  • End the arguement and release all of the other videos that were picked up that day and why weren't they released to the public ? Why did they find Nano Thermite at the Twin Towers ? The first time in air crashes planes have completely turned into dust ? Its not possible. 110 pilots have studyed this Pentagone crash and said its not possible to make that kind of move in this type of plane.Are they wrong also ? It all stinks to high heaven and America needs a real investagation of the facts!!

  • The best way of handling the 9-11 Truthie Cult is with a claw hammer and a room draped in plastic.

    They're too stupid to be allowed to breed.

  • i am from the CIA this guy is lying the cameras at the bace are not upgraded at the time as you see he could have messed with the video the fading you see was shadow reflecting from the planes in the court yard he could edit and make it fade and 3 sec does not mean any thing the FBI has research the video to see if anything worce hapend that was why we released it cameras there where not so hi tech when the plane hit and NBC could not fade that would be messing with goverment proptery

  • @1gateaway He didn't edit the video, its the RAW footage that the government released, and you clearly are not from the CIA because your grammar and logic is hilarious.

  • @1gateaway Wow. So you're from the CIA? Didn't know they emplyed people who don't even have a basic grasp of spelling and grammar. What a pile of dog shit you are.

  • Security cameras have a very slow frame rate , the stuff this guy is pointing out is typical when things happen between frames. He's just another douche that doesn't know what he's talking about.

  • K so where did flight 77 go?

  • And for the record I honor our brave soldiers, thank you for your service, but after studying 911 thoroughly I cannot come to any orhe conclusion that we have been lied to. God Bless America.

  • Missile

  • penis

  • No its because of the bad quality CCTV camera.

  • @deniapavao

    People who saw a jet liner hit the Pentagon = 137.

    People was saw a missile = 0

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • porn

  • NBC is the one that faded up these frames. Look at the actual ORIGINAL footage posted from JudicialWatch who obtained the originals after winning the FOIA for them. The frames do not fade at all.

  • @CreScope

    He was obviously mistaken about your age. No 13-year-old could spell that badly, unless severely retarded.

    Ten years old is a lot closer, isn't it?

  • @CreScope "3 men in suits came up to her and told her to say there was a plane no bomb"

    Further proof that nonstop playing of video games just fucks up the brain cells of 13-yr-old punks.

    Go back to Pokemon and masturbate yourself into a coma again.

  • @BlazingFerret "masturbate yourself into a coma again"

    I doubt if he can manage that. Considering he writes like a very slow 5th grader, he's no more than about ten years old.

  • Anyone who researches 9/11 does NOT believe the official story anymore. THEREFORE, if you know extreme detail about 9/11 and STILL push the official story, you are a government shill. People who believe the official story and aren't shills know NOTHING about the details of 9/11. They say, "I saw it on TV" or the furthest they go is they cite the government agency NIST. BlueShark/BlazingFerret is a government shill.

  • blazing ferret/blue shark (same person): there's a new video out there by AE911truth, search for "psychologists help 9/11 truth deniers". It's FREE mental health care for truth deniers provided by MENTAL HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, hundreds of them in the video. Yes, they give their names and degrees.

  • "blueshark69" is now fielding questions by the former "blazing ferrets".

  • Apparently, "blazing ferrets" is now "blueshark69".

  • "Blazing Ferret" - I'm sure those ferrets really ARE "blazing", probably where YOU put them! See: Richard Gere.

  • Furthermore, there ARE witnesses who said they did not see a "boeing" fly into the Pentagon. Do you know how to use Google? Or the search box in youtube? You're talking out of your ass!

  • @maplespak "there ARE witnesses who said they did not see a "boeing" fly into the Pentagon"

    Golly gee -- how many? Two? Three? compared to a couple of hundred that saw a jetliner?

  • Gutless Wonder, here's some more questions: Where's a PICTURE of flight 77 or even PARTS of it? So you think some guys can take a couple of flight lessons and fly boeings out to Cleveland, U-turn them, fly them back and find the WTC and smash into them? Can YOU do that? Do you believe Barbara Olson called Ted Olson from flight 77? Then how come in court the FBI themselves said the calls never took place? Care to answer any of those questions?

  • @maplespak "some guys can take a couple of flight lessons"

    Hanjour had 600 hours in the pilot's seat and held a commercial multi-engine pilot's license.

    If you weren't too stupid to figure out Google, you'd have known that yourself.

    Maybe mommy can help you with that complicated search engine stuff.

  • @maplespak "Where's a PICTURE of flight 77 or even PARTS of it?"

    Nobody else has any trouble finding photos of the engine parts, landing gear, wheels, flap actuators, struts, etc.

    So what's your problem?

  • If a plane hit the Pentagon, then I ask you: WHY wont the "govt" show any footage? WHY WHY WHY WHY? God damn criminals!

  • @Kando0615 "WHY wont the "govt" show any footage? "

    Next time your Muslim buddies plan an attack, have them let everyone know ahead of time so we can set up new high-speed cameras, so uneducated morons like you can jerk off to the video on Youtube.

    Damned inconsiderate of them not to have released their schedule ahead of time.

  • @BlazingFerret First of all I'm not even close to Muslim you stupid jackass, and second of all there were 84 surveillance cameras around the Pentagon that have the "collision" on camera and none of these tapes were ever released! Wow I wonder why? And I wonder how a steel Rolls Royce jet engine melts while, desks and passports remain intact. This story couldn't even be more obvious and you patriot cocksuckers are willing to buy any of the bullshit that Fox tells you hahaha

  • @StanailovaS "there were 84 surveillance cameras around the Pentagon"

    A clumsy lie, even for an ignorant Bulgarian peasant. In ten years you Truthie faggots can't find one bit of proof for ANY other cameras at the Pentagon, so you just keep spamming the same weak lie, hoping no one will catch you.

    No engines melted. Any idiot can find photos of engine parts ... except some uneducated clown like you.

  • @Kando0615

    Are you going to tell us why hundreds of eyewitnesses, including pilots, saw a jetliner? Many of them even ID'd it specifically as an American Airlines 757.

    So was this some new hologram technology? Mass hypnosis? Everyone in the area bribed or threatened ahead of time?

    Come on, smart ass -- enlighten us.

  • @Kando0615 - they already showed the footage you moron...

  • Great work here as WE ALL KNOW THAT NO PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON on 9/11/01!

  • @JohnNiemsMusic - so you are saying you are an idiot? we all saw the plane hit you moron...

  • @JohnNiemsMusic "Nobody saw a plane hit"

    Classic backwards reasoning from a cult follower.

    How do you account for hundreds of eyewitnesses, some miles away in Arlington Cemetery or on highways, that saw a 757?

    Are they all part of a giant plot?

  • @JohnNiemsMusic "HANI HANJOUR could never have flown the plane as he flunked his flight school"

    He had a commercial multi-engine pilots license and over 600 hrs of flight time.

    Large pieces of a Boeing 757 were found inside, and hundreds of eyewitnesses saw it on its way in.

    So you're afraid to tell us about these eyewitnesses ... whether they're part of this big conspiracy, too, or just paid off?

    Gutless fuck.

  • @BlazingFerret There you go again with profanity. John Niems is my real name as I have nothing to hide and I am not afraid of you or the MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX or anyone so tell me BLAZING FERRET who is gutless? And there is no debate as the evidence is overwhelmingly a BLACK OPTS SHADOW GOVERNMENT FALSE FLAG ATTACK! Have a nice day and I don't go to the spineless gutless name calling profanity of a SHILL!

  • @JohnNiemsMusic "John Niems is my real name"

    Who gives a shit. Are you really so self-absorbed as to think anyone in the government, or anywhere else for that matter, gives a flying fuck about you, or what you think?

    If you really believed there was some giant conspiracy you'd be hiding under your bed, pissing your panties.

    As it is, you know you're safe, because no one gives a shit about you or the rest of the Truthie Cult.

  • @blueshark69 Here we go again with the profanity! Who gives a shit who I am??? Well I can tell you a lot more give a shit about what I say than any BLUE SHARK or BLAZING FERRET as they know I am real and read books all the time and no one cares about CIA SHILLS anymore! YOU GUYS ARE HISTORY just like the OFFICIAL LIE OFFICIAL STORY which BTW is far from OFFICIAL or being PROVEN! 100 % LIES from top to bottom! CYA SCARED KITTY CAT 11! I have given you your new SHILL NAME!

  • @JohnNiemsMusic "YOU GUYS ARE HISTORY"

    Sure, that's why you gutless pricks don't even show up at Ground Zero anymore, after the NY firemen chased off Alex Jones and his giant crowd ... of SIX demonstrators. When they saw the firemen headed for them they ran for the subway like a pack of little girls with their tampons on fire.

  • @JohnNiemsMusic "John Niems is my real name"

    Considering the ghastly attempts at singing you've posted on Youtube, I'm amazed you aren't embarrassed to admit who you are.

  • @blueshark69 I'm amazed that you think you are smart and funny! It really must be very difficult to be such a pathetic and mentally damaged individual but then if you are ok with the psychopaths that rule the world then you can't be far away from that label either. It is not surprising that you will hide your identity as if I were you I would certainly not go out EVER as ONE THING YOU CAN'T HIDE IS WHEN YOU'RE CRIPPLED INSIDE! CYA

  • @JohnNiemsMusic

    Still waiting for you to deny that Hanjour had a commercial pilots license and over 600 hours flying.

    Embarrassed that you got caught bullshitting again?

  • @blueshark69 No need to reply to that as it is not true and he could not have flown the plane in the manner in which it was flown anyway. Pilots for 9/11 TRUTH have shown that without any doubt! So I deny that HANI HANJOUR could have flown the plane! How's that BS 69? You are a real deal shill and not a good one either!

  • @JohnNiemsMusic

    So the FAA and Hanjour's evaluator, plus all their records that show his license and his logged hours --

    they're all fake, because the FAA is part of this big conspiracy you've hallucinated?

  • @blueshark69 This is getting old BS 69 but everything you said here is pure BS like your name! Did you not see where the FAA destroyed the tape recordings of 6 air traffic controllers of their communications on 9/11/01 that were given to them and supposedly were with the alleged hijackers? First as I said before these so-called hijackers could never have flown the planes. Second no transponders were initiated which is common procedure for a hijacked plane so again NO HIJACKINGS OCCURRED! CYA

  • @JohnNiemsMusic "hijackers could never have flown the planes"

    You keep pretending that they didn't have commercial licenses and more time in the cockpit than you have on the guitar.'

    The hijackers turned the transponders off, fool. If you actually had done any research, you'd know that.

  • @blueshark69 "his license and his logged hours--they're all fake"

    Neither the amateur guitar plunker nor the fat kid seem to want to address this little difficulty with their delusion.

    They also ignore what the last guy who flew with them said, that Atta or Hanjour could have hit buildings with no trouble at all, once the plane was in the air.

  • @JohnNiemsMusic "HANI HANJOUR could never have flown the plane as he flunked his flight school"

    He had a commercial multi-engine pilots license and over 600 hrs of flight time.

    Large pieces of a Boeing 757 were found inside, and hundreds of eyewitnesses saw it on its way in.

    So you're afraid to tell us about these eyewitnesses ... whether they're part of this big conspiracy, too, or just paid off?

    Gutless fuck.

  • @BlazingFerret YOU seem to be the "gutless fuck", you use the name BlazingFerret and the guy you're arguing with is using his real name. How can you be that stupid? And btw, the Pentagon is the most filmed THING IN HISTORY with many security cameras rolling 24x7 and also from satellite. Do you care to tell us, gutless wonder, why there is no video released of what hit the most filmed THING IN HISTORY - the Pentagon? Why don't you tell us? We'll wait for your answer.

  • @maplespak "the Pentagon is the most filmed THING IN HISTORY with many security cameras rolling 24x7"

    Still waiting for you morons to show one bit of evidence for these cameras.

    8 million images of the Pentagon on Google image, and still you can't find one photo of these cameras.

    Are they connected to some Klingon cloaking device?

    Half a million people drive past the Pentagon every day, yet so far you can't find even one person who ever saw these mysterious cameras.

  • @BlazingFerret there is no way he could of flew that plane or made that turn... Niems is right check your facts shill.

  • @wingedknight "there is no way he could of flew that plane or made that turn""

    Too bad for you clowns that the last instructor who flew with him said that he'd have had NO trouble flying a 757 or hitting the biggest building in the area.

    I'll bet your buddies at Loose Change didn't bother to mention this, did they?

  • @BlazingFerret "He had a commercial multi-engine pilots license and over 600 hrs of flight time"

    The alleged "musician" doesn't want to talk about that, either.

    He just moves on to the next lie and hopes for the best.

  • @JohnNiemsMusic

    Still afraid to tell us why those hundreds of eyewitnesses claim to have seen a jetliner?

    You seem mighty reluctant to handle this question.

  • @blueshark69 SCARED KITTY CAT 11??? WHERE CAN YOU SHOW ME 100 WITNESSES? I have been researching this since 9/11/01. The LAME STREAM MEDIA witnesses that came forward to show their faces on the LSM were all discredited as they were SHILLS like your sorry ass! OOPS I used profanity. Sorry SKC 11~! Go to the pentaCon dot com to see real research and real witnesses!

  • @tnoyy34rt "we all saw the plane hit you moron"

    The little conspiracy faggot really believes it was some mass hallucination at the Pentagon, or that hundreds of eyewitnesses are part of some giant conspiracy of the New World Order, the Illuminati, Freemasons, Jew bankers, or the aliens from the Roswell crash.

    Of course he's afraid to actually state a theory, since even his Truther buddies would be laughing at him.

  • @BlazingFerret Ferret you want be saved by being a shill. we are the 99%! and we dont like bad Trolls! Go check the evidence it speaks for its self, cognitive dissonance > are you suffering from it? /watch?v=mEGgAk1AbA4&feature=p­layer_embedded

  • @wingedknight "we are the 99%! "

    ROFLMAO

    You pathetic freaks can't even draw a crowd at Ground Zero anymore, that's how irrelevant you are.

    The last time Alex Jones advertised for weeks, and only had six idiots show up at Ground Zero.

    At the tenth anniversary, not one of you assholes had the nerve to show up in NYC or the Pentagon.

    Aside from Youtube, you uneducated little fruits don't even exist anymore.

  • @blueshark69 THERE WERE 1,000'S ALL OVER NYC! The LAME STREAM MEDIA won't show us anymore as they are in on it! BLAZING FERRET to BLUE SHARK! Wow I sure like your SHILL NAMES! What's next ? SCARED KIITY CAT 11???

  • @BlazingFerret "Of course he's afraid to actually state a theory, since even his Truther buddies would be laughing at him"

    The funniest part of the Truthers is that they conduct this daily circle jerk on Youtube, while the whole world ignores them, since in ten years they haven't been able to produce a single publishable scientific or engineering paper supporting their weird ideas.

  • @tnoyy34rt bad troll bad troll.

  • @tnoyy34rt Then why didn't they found the black box(google it if you don't know what it is). Or better, i will tell you. Balck box is a device that monitors planes behavior in flight... Btw its unbreakable... So, conspiracy or not. You decide.

  • @1c1d0r3 "Then why didn't they found the black box"

    They DID find it, you ignorant fuck. Those faggots in PilotsForTruth have been arguing for ten years about the altitude readings on the Box.

    Borrow some money and buy a clue, you fucking amateur.

  • Comment removed

  • @damonpettit - saudis arabians are our own people? gosh, you clearly are uneducated. the people who did this are right here: (remove spaces of course)

    -

    sptimes. com /2002/09/01/911/plotters. shtml

    -

    where is there any american in the list?

    -

    so learn to check facts you moron...

  • Now I believe that attacks of 9/11 weren't what the gov. says it is, but the video you posted is wrong. Those screen captures from the footage are several seconds apart and the news channels spliced those frames together to make it look seamless.

  • Interesting...

  • @ArabLegandz "people should stop pointing fingers at the quaran and other muslims. islam is a peaceful religion "

    Still waiting for these "peaceloving" Muslims to get their fanatic element under control. There is little if any criticism of these animals in any of the Middle Eastern press, and damn sure not from any governments over there, like S. Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan, Syria, Lebanon, Pakistan, etc.

    So either the terrorists outnumber the others, or the others are just a pack of pussies.

  • @blueshark69 Last I checked those "fanatics" don't possess internal unity much less an air force, ballistic nuclear tipped missiles or a military machine capable of deploying anywhere in the world within 72 hours. Get real. Any "fanatics" out there number in the 1000s at best. I liken those in support of perpetual warfare with fanaticism. We're creating "terrorists" faster than we can kill them. If I were an Iraqi, and 450,000 children under the age of 12 were killed, I'd take up arms too.

  • @rkymtntruther "Any "fanatics" out there number in the 1000s at best"

    And those millions of Muslim cocksuckers that support those thousands with huge cash donations, and governments that provide training camps & cover for them all over the middle east & the Pacific rim?

    Personally, I'm for using nukes against those training camps, Tehran, and Mecca, but the pussies that run our alleged government don't have the balls to fight a pack of Girl Scouts.

  • @BlazingFerret Wow, it's like being insulted by a 5 year old. Can't really feel offended, just sad for the state of this country. You possess all the intellectual curiosity of a paper bag. You should be at a football game bearing a foam finger that reads "We're #1!" on it. But it'd probably be confiscated by the TSA. Happy economic collapse sir. I hope you possess some useful skill and not just an associates degree from the local jr college.

  • @rkymtntruther "Happy economic collapse sir. I hope you possess some useful skill"

    I'll spend most of my free time laughing at you pathetic urbanized assholes, starving and freezing because you have no food, water or basic necessities to last a few years.

    Watching pudgy, pasty little weaklings like you try to survive is going to be the best entertainment of all, as you happily trade your mother and your sister for just one roll of toilet paper & a jug of clean well water.

  • @blueshark69 It's ironic that your reply to my comments so closely resembles the reply I typically give to douche bags like you when they tell me I'm crazy for thinking that economic collapse is coming. I find that humorous. Don't worry about me though, I became involved with commodities speculation some years ago and have profited from it quite well actually. I have better stores of food & materials than most, and I've actually lost about 20 lbs since i began my workout routine. Good luck!

  • @rkymtntruther "economic collapse is coming"

    By far the least likely reason for being self-sufficient. 30 yrs ago I was on several anti-terrorist committees in DoD & other agencies, where it became obvious that (a) we were going to get hit hard eventually, and (b) our food, water, electric & heat infrastructure couldn't take even a minor hit without major local chaos. With one simple "accident" on I-95 deliveries of EVERYTHING could stop for weeks, maybe months, & electric could cease. cont'd

  • @BlazingFerret So then why are myself and others such bad people for raising these questions? I'm well aware of what you've just pointed out regarding (a) & (b). What's to stop you from doing something positive with your life (assuming what you say about your background is true), by helping out guys like me? What because I'm over weight? Is that all that's holding you back? Is it so hard to believe that the people at the very tip top of command, above you even, would lie about some details?

  • @rkymtntruther "So then why are myself and others such bad people for raising these questions?"

    Not necessarily bad, just amazingly foolish and unwilling to face facts. Claiming that no plane hit the Pentagon, in the face of hundreds of eyewitnesses & a couple of tons of obvious 757 parts clearly visible in photos is not only absurd, it's childish. Anyone with the vaguest clue how the gov't -- esp. the military -- works knows that you couldn't keep a plot like this secret.

  • @rkymtntruther "doing something positive with your life"

    I did my bit, getting shot at -- and occasionally hit -- in the cesspools of the world, for 20+ yrs, then spent more training others.

    The reason I take time to do this is to keep young naive kids from getting sucked into this mindless nonsense, even tho time spent here costs me money.

    I'd rather be training dogs or running a couple of extra miles a day, or reloading, or writing.

  • There are others in your position who've had the courage to step forward and put their careers and everything else on the line. Just sayin'...

  • @rkymtntruther (cont'd)

    Almost nobody could survive that long, esp. in winter, but on my small farm I have unlimited food (bass pond & deer), water, & a bigger arsenal than most - 36 guns, around 12,000 rounds, enough medication (including morphine, antibiotics etc) for years. Not enough dog food, but that's where looters come in handy.

  • @BlazingFerret :0) Good for you man. That's why I'm taking what steps that I am taking so that I don't need to become your dog food. How can you hate on me for that?

  • @rkymtntruther "How can you hate on me for that?"

    You miss the point. Pointing out that your position on 9/11 is foolish has nothing to do with your attempts to get self-sustaining. Anyone savvy enough to understand the fragility of the creaky support system that feeds us & supplies electricity, heat, water, sewer, etc. should be able to figure out that Alex Jones & the conspiracy pimps are selling you a grossly flawed product.

  • @blueshark69 It'll be fun when an asshole like you comes around the bend. I've got a hollow point saved just for the occasion.

  • @rkymtntruther "when an asshole like you comes around the bend"

    Not likely, since BlueShark's survival stash is nearly as impressive as mine. No reason to go anywhere, just sit back and wait for stupid hungry people, since the dogs will get hungry, too.

    BlueShark actually has full-auto, but I prefer a simpler arsenal.

  • @BlazingFerret "BlueShark actually has full-auto"

    Back when you could get a greasegun for 600 bucks, it was hard to pass up the deal. Especially when i sold my spares, legally, for 2500 apiece after the chimp got elected.

    I love these amateur survivalists, who probably don't even have a hi-pressure, big-bore airgun, so 20,000 rounds doesn't cost shit but will still drop a deer at 100 yards.

  • @blueshark69 "you could get a greasegun for 600 bucks"

    My wife talked me out of the greasegun in favor of AMC-10s, which were only 250, with suppressor. Since she had the FFL for NFA & DD, we bought ten, but sold them all when the prices went thru the roof to 3K. Should have saved a few, they're 4 or 5K now if you can find one. They're fun, but expensive to feed & I have other things available for crowd control, like 12g phosphorus shells & flechette.

  • Respond to this video... Also, what huge cash donations? Like the 100k wired from ISI to Muhammed Atta? Strange that the head of Pakistani ISI was meeting with Porter Goss the day of 9/11, and yet he helped to finance the attacks. Porter Goss was one of those super competent republicans right?

  • @rkymtntruther "Like the 100k wired from ISI to Muhammed Atta?"

    You'll swallow whatever sperm those crackpot websites feed you, obviously -- even though there is not a shred of proof for that fairy tale. It's based on an Indian newspaper article -- Pakistan's worst enemy -- and they have no sources at all.

  • "degenerate, inbred brats", not human beings? Ok then, I've nothing to say to you. Why? A much wiser person than myself once stated, "Never enter into an argument with an idiot, the folks looking on who you're trying to convince won't be able to distinguish between the two of you."

  • @rkymtntruther

    Are you going to give your source for this Pakistani ISI money transaction, or are you too embarrassed at getting caught?

  • @rkymtntruther "If I were an Iraqi"

    Hard to tell exactly which flavor of Muslim sympathizer you are.

    But you'll obviously swallow whatever bullshit the imam feeds you, if you believe the US killed a half million of those degenerate, inbred brats spawned in Iraq.

    Not that it necessarily would be a BAD thing ....

  • Comment removed

  • @BlazingFerret Wow, sucks when people don't just fit into a box. Tough for intellects like yours to make sense of it all. Take deep breaths ok?

  • This idiot is downright embarrassing.

    He doesn't even understand the difference between the video itself and the TV reproduction of the original video ... not to mention at least one machine in the middle, probably more.

    But of course the Truthers, being basically even more ignorant than he is, swallow this bullshit eagerly.

  • I'm a video editor. Sometimes frames can bleed into each other. Also, the frame rate of the security camera was much lower than the codec used to render the video you played in QuickTime. That's why you hit the button 39 times before the explosion. The frame rate of your converted video is likely 29.97fps.

    Not to discount any other theories -- just this particular one.

  • That last bit of footage you showed (from the helicopter view), the fire appeared to be moving on TOP of the actual footage, is if it was POORLY digitally added. And the object in question doesn't look like a plane to me, I don't know what it could be, but I shouldn't be struggling to see what's supposed to be a huge plane. So I agree that there are missing frames (why?) and that in the helicopter view, that shit is fake. Can anyone see the car in the background that's in the first bit of foota

  • looks like proof of missing FRAMES to me, ever try watching a WHOLE video?

  • there's no evidence of a plane hitting in the 1 place is there? other than what they said..

  • hundreds of wittness did not see a jet hit the opentegon

  • That footage where it shows a missile (the second video) appears to be fake.

  • ANYONE WHO BELIEVES THE "OFFICIAL" 9/11 "STORY", ARE SOOOOOOOOO MISLEAD AND SOOOOOO BRAINWASHED BY THEIR GOVERNMENT !!!

  • Allow me to explain it a little better. You arent slowing down and viewing the footage of the planes impact at all. Youre slowing down and viewing the television broadcast. Your mistake is of monumental proportions. I hope you dont base your life and view of reality on just YOUR mistaken interpretation of things. That'd make for a miserable mistake ridden life where nothing made any sense. Can you, for one moment, comprehend that humans make errors in judgement? Like the one you just did?

  • He is going fram by frame, NOT ON THE VIDEO OF WHAT OCCURED.... but on the television broadcast. What an idiot. Unreal. And he basis his entire abusrd conspiracy based on a mistake of his own. UNREAL! Glad this guy isnt a judge or surgeon.

  • OMG, what an idiot. He is running a slow motion video, and then trying to view it in slowmotion using his home software. What an idiot. Too funny.

  • Wait wait wait. I'm not saying what the heck is the missile/plane thing, but you obviously don't have the original digital file, and those frames you are skipping are not 1:1 the originals frames of the footage, the video compression of the TV signal makes that cross-fade effect you see when switching frames. I like conspiracy theories as much as the next guy, but this analysis was bullshit

  • Thanks for the insight, outcastUNO. If government coverups don't leave a foul enough taste in your mouth, just head to the comments section. There you'll find the true problem, the true face of inhumanity. Get it together, ppl. Get it right or there won't be anything left worth fighting for.

  • Just search up 911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77, everything will be cleared up. But vid is interesting, why would they have missing frames

  • And how can someone fly a plane and come in doing a zillion miles an hour at 30 feet off the deck and hit nothing but the front door? 

  • Seriously I've never bought this footage. But what happened to the passengers supposedly on the plane?

  • You guys need to chill, Remember, these cmeras were froom 01... So there not fucking HD and shit, They go slow and old! Not a fraud...

  • @CloudsInDahSky

    Based on footage, the "plane traveled" at:

    450 feet in 1/30th of a second = 13500 feet/sec. = 2.55 miles/sec. = 153.4 miles/min. = 9204.54 mph = 7997 kts. = **Mach 12.11**

    Even if 77 impacted at a 90-degree angle, it would still exceed Mach 6.

    Flight 77 was apparently flying more than triple the top speed of an SR-71 Blackbird (Mach 3+). Mach 1 is the speed of sound.

    Deduction: Fraud.

  • @7Epitaph I'm ten, I'm smart so I can type, and I know how to cuss. But... I'm not that freaking smart...

  • @CloudsInDahSky

    Well, don't rant about something you know little about. And swearing does nothing but belittle your statements.

  • Sorry the aerial view is a FAKE--

    Google- "35mm Stock Footage of Washington DC aerials" Compare the two!

  • South Park is right, a 1/3 of all Americans are retarted, the proof is this video

  • @autokid15 A lot of the conspiracy theorists, unfortunately, make up a certain percentage of those retards though, so I understand to a degree why we have a bad rep. 911 was still an inside job though.

  • What you call a 'fade up' is normal when you take a video that is 1 frame/sec and convert it into a DVD. Not frauded. You shouldn't keep mistakes like this in the public eye. But it sure does looks like a missile.

  • stop hating on the muslims, the terrorists that did the attacks were Jihadists . if it were buddhists would you hate the whole buddhist population? (not saying im muslim, more of, im open to most major religions except christianity and satanism.) most muslims are peace loving and hated the fundamentalists that planned this attack.

  • Great video man, excellent work. I commend you !!

  • thats because its transitioning from frame to frame. okay lets so it wasnt hit by a plane. could, seeing as ur a clearly a genius, tell me what happened to that plane and all the people on board?

  • If a plane really hit the pentagon their would be footage!

  • @blueshark69

    Oh really.. Well how? How does one exain that the " plane " was not intercepted? Or how not 1 camera shows us a clear image of the plane? Why the hole is too small? Why that part of pentagon WAS EMPTY? Why PNAC states: we need a new pearl harbor?

    Why frames were cut out on this footage?

    You officially suck.

  • @kobesaa "Why the hole is too small?"

    Because you're a lying sack of shit.

    You won't link to photos that clearly show 100' of wing damage surrounding the central hole, tearing up dozens of steel-reinforced concrete columns and stonework:

    TinyUrl (dot) com/3yu2hz

    This makes you a pathetic liar, a paid shill for the terrorists.

  • @MsgtSpook

    Wow, i heard newsreporters say " there are no large plane section, wing section or fuselage". So is this a lie? No thanks, id rather believe that than your stupid theory.

    Outline of a jetliner? Lol there was just a small hole, no damage done to the outzide shere the wings are. So there were no wings, hence missile

  • @BlazingFerret

    Is it normal for a person to repirt she saw a camera at the pentagon.. Is that really shocking? LOL you know thats just total crap.

    Exact number is classified. But I most certainly know its not just two shitty caneras FROM THE SAME FUCKING ANGLE. 15 frames were cut out like this guy says. Why, you have something to hide??

    Not to mention CIA intercepted footage talen from a gas station and a hotel.

    9/11 = hoax = inside job, period.

  • @kobesaa

    So who's paying you to shill for the terrorists?

    Why are you afraid to explain those wing-holes on either side of the central hole?

    Why can't you explain the support knocked IN, rather than blown out, like a missile would do?

    Why do you also run away from telling us why 100s of eyewitnesses saw a jetliner & NONE saw a missile?

    I know you're a pussy, but this hiding & whimpering is getting really embarrassing for you, even for a piece of Eurotrash.

  • @MsgtSpook

    The impact zone suggests that the plane hit at a 90-degree angle (officially, this is not the case). Flight 77 allegedly hit the pentagon at an angle that we would expect side columns to be bent forward in the direction of the kinetic energy - they are not. What we see is a rectangular hole (even after the collapse) that fits squarely on the side of the building - unlike the official plane impact.

    Also, your following statement is uneducated, as no witness saw the point of impact.

  • @BlazingFerret

    I dont know if its normal te report you saw 10 cameras.. Is that normal like, is that really shocking that people have to notice freakin cameras? You talk bullshit amd you know it.

    Exact number is classified, but its not one shitty camera. Not to mention CIA intercepted camera footage from a gas station. 15 frames of the footage we have were cut out. Why? Cuz it was a missile :)