The constitution does not vest the government in the authority to make laws over the people. This was intentional and for very good reason but, they do it anyway. To trick people into believing it vests such authority, they created the Bill of Rights which is an act of fraud. Reference any law dictionary from the time, amend and amendment did not allow additions, only corrections or alterations to what was already written.
Hence the reason it's a BILL of rights making it even more fraudulent.
guess what, retards.. the constitution was the creation of the federal slavemaster that has denied americans freedom for the last 200 years...wake up, you stupid brainwashed slaves
Wow, a lot of the Reichties on here are having a hemorrhage over the fact that what George Moron Jr. is saying that the U.S. don't torture......They hemorrhaging over the fact that Danny Glover is telling the truth.....That the U.S. is/was torturing, and that their fealess Moron leader was lying.....But like all good Reichties they have to create a distraction........
Danny don't you have the rights to ALL GOD's DANGERS!! This is a film that needs to be made!! and for all you who dis Danny may you get the Bobby Hutton treatment!!
We will not find justice at the hands of corrupt judges. (See YouTube videos) Judge to Judge on Illegal Payments to Judges / Evil Triangle of Court Corruption / Richard fine / Dr Shirley Moore slush funds /SBX 211. To end this title wave of corruption in our country must start with the corrupt judges. We can not bring evidence of corruption to corrupt judges. Los Angeles Superior Court judges are illegally and unconstitutionally taking 50,000.00 each for a total of 23 million per year.
Glover is definitely a commie and isn't afraid to admit it. I'll never understand how rich celebretards can embrace the very ideas that espouse anti-wealth and anti-individualism.
@wilberwilbers Danny was in the ditches with the Black Panthers--you may not have liked them but Danny was with them--but if you will accept a good word from me a non-rich commie,you are exactly right! These celeb commies drive me nuts--you might change your opinion of us Reds if you read about the lives of non-celeb commies Hosea Hudson black sharecropper Unionj organizers--but you are exactly right! Even if you remain anti-red you are an honorable opponent,
What the ??????? You voted Obama into office and he is violating the Constitution at breakneck speed. Wealth redistribution, bailouts, class wars, and universal healthcare are ALL unconstitutional. Look it up, you hypocrites.
Danny Glover, Listening to you on Tavis, I think you would find some of my original songs of interest. Go to You Tube, enter BertGriffin88, and 25 of my songs will become available. Take a listen to: 1. "God Said, Thomas", 2. "Trust Me Baby, I Can Handle What's Wrong", 3. "Tumbled Down Town" 4. "(Obama's Song) Waiting So Long", 5. "(Obama's Song II) As Brightness Warmed The World", 6. "Rich Man, Rich Man (Not This Time)", 7. "(Not Gotters) You Just Get Got" 8. "(The Lies)"
Keep up Bush..those fat richy arabs do not care for their bro and sis..just do what you must to do.."Big Great Israel" is your Holy Land..you allready have half of that,but be careful..human beings are not sheeps..they have brains,and you are so stupid to do this job..you are burned New World Disorder and zionism with 9/11,and sheeps will wake up soon,so you and your devil(devil bless you) could not fight against AllMighty God!
New World Order will stick right in your fathers stinky ass!
These 7 voted to kill Kucinich's bill on 11/6 to impeach Cheney, so they need to CHANGE their positions and fulfill their oath of office to defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign AND domestic: Howard Berman (CA-28), Artur Davis (AL-07), William Delahunt (MA-10), Zoe Lofgren (CA-16), Jerrold Nadler (NY-08), Linda Sanchez (CA-39), and Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL-20). Find them online and send emails, make phone calls; Put the pressure on for IMPEACHMENT!
Bush and the Republican Congress (from 2000 until 2006) fucked our country beyond belief. The new DEMOCRATIC congress can't get anything done because BUSH VETOes everything.
DEMOCRATS can't be any worse than the PAST 7 years of REPUBLICANTS!!!
Republicans = NOT ONE SINGLE SUCCESS in the past 7 years. That's why they are already attacking the Democrats.
Republicans are liars, cheaters and thieves. That's why they are already attacking, because they have no successes to promote.
Dude, you've become of the sheeple and you have no idea how the New World Order works. Clinton and his CFR buddies want you dead so they can have their prostitutes and power in peace with no one looking over their shoulders. Watch ENDGAME on Google Video or youtube. PS I said the same thing you did in '92. Clinton has as much blood on his hands as Bush.
pp-BusHtiler has genocide on his war criminal hands with the USA murder/mutilation of 1,000,000 & the displacement of 5,000,000 Iraqi innocent elders, women & children.The USA military weapons' economy, along with it's imperialist colonial puppet gov'ts around the world, are run by ruthless, hideously greedy selfish bastards here in the U.S.There are NO DEMOCRACIES in the USA kingdom, including America where the wealthy control the brainwashed masses.Ur the one being duped
People need to wake the hell up! Stop blaming the Bush administration. Who do you think passed all the evil laws that Bush has used? The corrupt members of Congress, Democrat and Republicans. They voted for the Iraq War. They voted for the PATRIOT Act. They voted for the Military Commisions Act. Throw all the bums out. Not just Bush.
Amen! Everyone is blasting Bush, that he lied to the people, well he can only go on the information that was gicin to him, also, everyone seems to be blaming him for this war, well excuse me, isent there a checks a blance system set up in this country were the presidents actions have to be approved? So why are we mad at him? Why arent you upset with the people who approved his war act?
I AM WITH YOU ON THIS....I know the it's not just him. The corrupt members of Congress, Democrat and Republicans & many others are the reason why the bills get passed & also because of not enought of us going a shit about what goes on passed our daily lives. PLEASE GET INVOLVED PEOPLE or our land will be someone else. I am talking about another country.
If you do not defend the Constitution now then be prepared to be rounded up soon as a political dissident during a midnight raid on your home and be sent away to a FEMA Concentration camp. They have already been built. Just Google:
ron paul supports the 14th amendment but some corpartation have indorsed this amendment for them selves. this amendment was for all people not the big bissness alet/bankers/lobbyest that run around congess with thier appreations bills/like holburten oil tycuns.
Dear Mr. Glover you and me have the right to change it like lou dobbs and joe madison said the other day they changed there party ticket to read indpentent because both partys have their own agenda's and can't be bothered by the people of the colonies thaat put the people in to the elected office witch they hold, well I could go on and on but Danny im in Seatle I will wave my ron paul revolution on inter state I-5 for you and me God Bless You:)
what a joke...this coming from a useful idiot actor who praises a marxist dictator who wouldnt let an ad like this show on one of venezuelas many state run tv stations.... truly pathetic.
LOL, I just find it hilarious to see Danny Glover "support" the constitution. This is one of the many actor douchebags who visits with Hugo Chavez, one of the biggest civil liberties violators in the world.
Danny Glover is a great guy! He has also done a lot of activism to give voice to the Palestinians, which is a daring, and much needed, thing to do in the U.S.
Oops, I mixed you up with someone else, looks like. Perhaps you were talking about my first-hand experience with spanking. Earlier comments apply to BushCultists.
But I do believe spanking is bad. If you're not smart enough to come up with nonviolent ways to discipline your children, such as taking away their Wii, then you deserve to be alienated by your children when they grow up. Such is justice. Enjoy your (collective) sunset years alone.
So Paul supports child beating? He opposes laws that protect children? Only parents have rights? Children can't vote, which explains a lot of winger policies.
Here's one for a Paul lover: Why not privatize religion? Just get government out of it entirely. No more "special rights," tax exemptions, AKA subsidizing churches who now get free fire and police protection and protection from "terrists" by redistributing our tax dollars to them. They don't need welfare from your tax dollars, right?
you're right about privatizing religion- for a church to take 501c3 status it means the government controls was is preached from the pulpit. It is a form of mind control- sermons and readings are twisted to appease the beast system and maintain 501c3 tax exemption in a system based purely on fraud in the first place. That is why the 501c3 churches never speak out against abortion or the Iraq War they have sold their souls to the beast for a tax exemption
I don't QUITE agree with that. Here's what I say: Churches get free local, state, and national services. Their presence adds to the number of fire stations needed, for example. You pay more taxes to cover the additional load, so in essence you are subsidizing a religion you may not agree with. If they can afford those huge palaces, they don't need our tax dollars. It's basically freeloading and welfare for the rich, as well as the establishment of religion by government.
Rupaul supports taxing churches so our tax burden is less and they stop freeloading off of us? And he's against BushCult's war too? Too bad he wants to take away our EPA, FDA, and SEC so voters have less say about their everyday affairs and must leave those decisions to fatcats in NEW YORK CITY!
RP does not support taxing churches neither giving them money. Period. And he supports deregulation so that governments must compete for the better laws, and serve the people - not otherwise, with one rule for all the land. That is called fascism.
OK, so he won't tax churches, including one here under investigation that can afford its on private jet. How much more taxes does he want us to pay to subsidize government services to churches, including, say, air traffic controllers for their private jets? :) How much more do YOU want to pay?
Answering your question, none. Churches and corporations and individuals should pay the services they consume. That way its nobody's business - either than their followers - if they have private jets or not. You are right, there are many ways you can subsidize at the expense of taxpayers.
No shit, Sherlock! I'm a patriot, I will defend the Constitution you wingers are shredding with your "unitary executive." Any of you traitors entering MY neighborhood after a coup better be wearing the kind of body armor the incompetent chickenhawk neocons denied our troops in Iraq.
Yeah, let's get direct control of our environment out of the hands of voters by eliminating the EPA. Union Carbide and ExxonMobile know what's best for you peons.
My parents spanked me a lot. When I left home, there were no goodbyes, no hugs. They got no birthday presents, no anniversary presents, no phone calls, no get well cards over the years. Mom apologized about a month before she died, but that was too late. Child abuse has a price we all pay.
Well, I spent 10 years in Houston and remember Paul as being a nutball everyone made fun of. I was amazed to find out he was still around and in this election cycle as a candidate fpr prez.
I used to work with two libertarians. They opposed speed limits, seat belts, and child safety seats, among other positions. Is Paul like that too?
this is not a left or right issue. It is the issue of the American people. It is an issue that affects us all. It is stomping on Freedoms that up until 01 we had. Realize this and your on your way to the answers you seek.
Danny Glover shredding the constitution? Is that our constitution or Venezuela's? Danny Glover wouldn't know freedom if it bit him in a sensitive area. This guy kisses Hugo Chavez on the lips. He is totally socialist. He should support Bush because he is doing Glover's job for him.
KPIX in San Fran picked it up too. They interviewed people. It's on their web site. It's a good report. The woman's final excuses are, 1) The Ron Paul contingent was making the others uncomfortable, and 2) they weren't really invited anyway.
Agreed. I don't mean to seem condescending, but this is 2007 and the parties have swapped "poor people" quite a few times since then. They come in handy for votes. I'm not under the illusion that any of the current candidates are going cure poverty, but at least some(Ron Paul, Kucinich) have proven that they would try.
They are the ones that got us into this quagmire of a war so that they could feel better about being fat, ignorant, wife-beating, racist fuckheads. All so they could pretend that they knew what they were talking about when Bush spoon fed them his bile.
That was kind of an angry short sided rant. To clarify, the Toby Keith fans didn't LITERALLY get us into the war. Plenty of Democratic politicians voted for it as well as the Patriot Act. I don't claim to be a Democrat. But I don't think anyone will forget the way anyone dissenting from the Freedom Fries world view was treated as a traitor. Still pissed about that, and I think it's their fucking turn to feel like shit now that the truth about this war is evident.
Seems that all of the "Republicans" that have posted here are the same that have always been Bush loyalists. They have no original thought, but rather have to repeat whatever bullshit Limbaugh tells them. They are exactly the type of people RepubliCONs prey on because they are morons.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The commercial is against sending terrorists to guantanamo. its against interrogation of those terrorists at guantanamo. they want terrorists to have the same rights as American citizens. Hence, the commercial is pro-terrorist.
WRONG. They send "suspected terrorists" to Guantanamo. The definition of terrorist is becoming ever more broadened and nebulous. It is getting to the point where anyone can be labeled a suspected terrorist without hard evidence and locked away in Gitmo without being charged.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
ummmmm....since when have people captured during war, that are not american citizens protected under the US constitution....you go to another country and do something to get arrested, you won't be protected by their constitution, or OURS!!
So you wont mind us torturing or slaughtering American citizens (We're not as barbaric as you guys, this is purely hypothetical)? But I think this ad should be about the Geneva conventions but maybe that doesn't resonate quite as loudly as the constitution with Americans.
the idea that communism and fascism are on opposite sides of the political spectrum should be revised. both ideologies deny personal rights (a social factor) while fascism still supports business and communism shits all over it
and plus ppl need to get 50 years of this democracy vs. communism bullshit out of their heads b/c communism is a type of economy whereas democracy is a type of government. if anything it should be capitalism vs. communism
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
a few things about this. the US constitution applies to US citizens. I defy anyone to show evidence of authorized torture to any of the detainees. the stuff everyone has heard about was unauthorized and has been dealt with. last,if any of the animals currently in US custody were released, you can bet they will soon be recaptured,killed or worse end up killing US troops or citizens.The President didn't do everything right, far from it, but the alternative is just unacceptable.
What animals? I thought we were talking about people... not zoos.. oh wait, are you doing that thing where you pretend someone isn't human so it doesn't seem as bad to torture them?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
not pretending they are not human. they are not. these are the same people who take a steak knife and behead someone just because you believe in a different god then they do.
Under the patriot act the gov't can declare anyone an enemy combatant. So let's say you "annoy" the Bush admininstration...BAM-off you go to Gitmo with no warrant, no trial, and no habeas corpus, forever.
Of course they're human. Why insist on calling them subhuman or animals if your intent is not simply to make them easier to demonize? It saddens me to see that people who don't believe in human rights such as yourself have any say in the political process.
"the same people who take a steak knife and behead someone"
Since you seem to be into demanding evidence to back up claims, let's see some from you... unless you're the hypocritical imbecile that I think you are.
The constitution is supposed to keep the government from doing certain things to ANYONE. The word "citizen" appears in only a few places. Get a copy of it and search for the word. ALL MEN are endowed with certain unalienable rights. The prohibition of denial of habeas corpus says nothing about citizenship.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
A few things about this.One the constitution of the US applies to US citizens. Two,I defy anyone to show evidence of authorized torture of the detainees in US custody.The incidents that everyone has heard about were unauthorized and have been dealt with.Last, if the animals that are in these prisons were released,you can bet they would soon be recaptured,killed or worse, be responsible for the deaths of US troops or citizens.the alternative is just unacceptable.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Nice spokesman for a Constitution defense!. Danny Glover poses, hugs and receives money from Hugo Chavez, a dictator who as NO respect for his own constitution, or the US for that matter. Hypocrite.
I think John McCain might have some real life experience with this issue. But I guess torture's good if you need false confessions to confirm what you want to hear. And just because Glover's an actor doesn't mean he's not informed.
Whoever he may be supporting, the video is saying the right thing about Bush and the present U.S. administration. Why would anyone want to quibble about that? If more people whose opinions are listened to, would stand up and be counted, perhaps people would listen. For the truth's sake: drop your pseudonyms and stand up and be counted for who you are. Anthony Lawson
im not sure about this video. while although i agree with the beginning portion of this video, i had to stop mid course when i saw glover's face considering i have personally seen glover's name on a boheiman grove list of invitees. in matter of fact, anyone can. it makes you wonder if this is pressure from below as well as the top??
It is unbelieveable that a commy pinko chump like this idiot ACTOR has something to say about the constitution. My last turd knows more about the what our founding fathers wanted than this hollywood turd does.
Piss on Danny Shithead Glover! He doesn't support the Constitution. It's an embarrassment to hear those words spew out of his mouth like so much bull-diarrhea.
There's not a liberal alive that believes in less government and more individual freedom. If one tells you he does, he's a goddamn liar!
You want clear observations? The only allow 500 characters here, not 50,000 words!
But, just off the top of my head, what about liberals wanting to take away our right to bear arms? And freedom of speech...they want to make it against the law to offend anybody by speaking the truth. That's why television is so full of lies.
...and how about that "affirmative action" crap. The Constitution is all about using your personal skills, education and talents to advance yourself in life. It says nothing about pushing skilled people to the back of the line because you think your skin color gives you special privileges. That's not Freedom...it's facism!
Then there's taxes...liberals love taking away my earnings to distribute to people whom they think need my money more than I do. And I have to pay school taxes every year, even though I have no kids, so all the little wetback "gangstas" can get a free education in a country they don't even legally belong in. More stinkin' fascism!
I could go on and on, but you'll just make excuses anyhow, so fuck off!
Communism is one end of the economic spectrum and fascism is the other. We have to make sure not to swing too far either way. When either the public or private sector has too much influence, the citizens and nation as a whole suffer badly.
How is fascism on one end and communism on the other? The left-right paradigm is poorly defined. There is no place for libertarians and anarchists, for example, if fascism is the opposite of communism. If you put fascism at the extreme right, then the trend towards less government exhibited on the right ends in totalitarianism.
Ok. I agree that it is a false dichotomy, but it's a peeve of mine when people equate communism and fascism. When the private sector controls everything you have the same kinds of corruption and abuse that you get when the public sector controls everything.
Mussolini said that he controlled the companies. If he controlled them, then he controlled those corporations, then what is the difference between "corporatism" and communism? What exactly is corporatism?
"Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini
Paul is more of a plutocrat. He doesn't think We The People can decide issues for ourselves, like how clean their air is, in the voting booth. Those matters are best left to unelected CEOs in NYC who know what's best for you, right?
No political party calls themselves "fascist" by definition but that doesn't mean they're not controlled by fascists. There's no real difference in our two main parties, other than their propaganda. They're both controlled by corporate lobbyists and Zionists, which is to say, "whoever has the most money to give away".
OK, don't pay school taxes, but also never hire someone who went to as public school and make money off their knowledge. THAT would be freeloading, something for nothing. And never buy from a company that employs public school grads, since you will assisted by them. If you make any use of them, you are a hypocrite and best ignored.
Schools benefit everyone, not just your kids. A little selfish and self-centered (aka conservative), are we?
Your logic is flawed. Of course schools benefit everyone, he never stated that they didn't. He is arguing that he must pay for education for those that aren't even asking for it. He is stating for a repeal of the education tax. This does not mean that people will not go to school any longer but rather that anyone who wants to go to school would have to pay for it directly. There is nothing wrong with supporting someone who has done that.
How 'bout anyone who does not support BushCult's war doesn't have to pay for it, and those who do "would have to pay for it directly?" Fair is fair.
"...those that aren't even asking for it... So 6 year olds should decide whether or not they go to school?
In a democracy, you give and get. We have what we have today as the result of voting for over 200 years. If you don't like our form of government, what form do you like?
I start off what's turned out to be the most interesting conversation on this board, so here you gotta come with the most patently ridiculous comment I've seen all week. I don't have the time, space or inclination to list all the things wrong with your perception of fair behavior. Please lay off the T.V. and start learning about reality.
Translation: "I have no logical comeback for that, so I'll duck the question and make meaningless personal attacks instead."
OK, if you want to fight BushCult's war with "other people's money" instead of yours (and other people's children), at least ENLIST. I'm a veteran who volunteered many decades ago, so what are you, a chickenshit hypocrite?
LOL...my comment needs no translation. You can take every word completely literally.
What's really hilarious is that you accuse me of dodging the issue with "meaningless personal attacks", then in the next paragraph call me a "chickenshit HYPOCRITE". ROFLMAO! If the irony of that is too over your head, you're even dumber than I thought. HAHAHAHAHAHA
...stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.
They could shorten the whole definition to read "Hillary Clinton"
Don't tell me how to use words. Especially when you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
Funny, I read that and think a better definition would be "George W. Bush". Oh, and by the way, fascism is marked by being extremely right-wing (look it up in the dictionary), Hillary Clinton is a left-wing democrat.
Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush...what's the damn difference? If you don't think they're all working hand-in-hand, you're simply one of the hordes of brainwashed "sheeple" that is helping our country enter the third world by ignorance alone.
As for your definition of "fascism", I just looked it up in about 20 online dictionaries. The only one that uses the term "right-wing" is the Oxford Dictionary. That's a British rag. The Brits are so close to communism that they may as well just start calling themselves that. Even their dictionaries are full of commie propaganda. They don't believe in Freedom of Speech, so their definitions should be ignored.
Well I do feel that it is necessary to ask what exactly it is you have done to not be one of these "sheeple". I admit all I've done is protest the war and write people in political office expressing my dissatisfaction with the current situation, but as any anti-bush protester is not allowed to express their opinion at bush rallies, I have little recourse. Oh, and I probably won't reply, because
TMWKK: Fascism is exactly the definition you provided above.
At the same time, affirmative action or any initiative aimed at jump-starting minority groups or other individuals in no way plays into the idea of fascism: which as an authoritative government cares very little for social rights.
The roots of the term fascism go back to the military dictator Mussolini of Italy. How do the totalitarian actions of him and other dictators of the ilk (Stalin, Lenin, Hirohito and etc) play into liberal programs like affirmative action?
Please... You're obviously ignorant to this particular topic- and apparently very angry about your politcal beliefs. Try to be kinder and you won't appear so arrogant (especially when you're completely wrong)
Gee, that sound exactly like BushCult! One tiny example, "forcible suppression of opposition." Look how many peaceable people have been arrested for words on their T-shirts and bumper stickers at BushCult rallies.
Why do Loyal Bushies hate freedom that much? Why don't they just move to China?
See John Dean's book on authoritarianism, "Conservatives Without Conscience," or google "John Dean authoritarianism" for more examples. Sad for America and freedom.
Neo-Nazis were all for affirmative action until others wanted it too. If you supported only Whites getting jobs and using whatever water fountain they chose, then you were for affirmative action. If you only want it for yourself, then you are a hypocrite and your opinion doesn't matter to real Americans.
The constitution does not vest the government in the authority to make laws over the people. This was intentional and for very good reason but, they do it anyway. To trick people into believing it vests such authority, they created the Bill of Rights which is an act of fraud. Reference any law dictionary from the time, amend and amendment did not allow additions, only corrections or alterations to what was already written.
Hence the reason it's a BILL of rights making it even more fraudulent.
JonDeth 5 months ago
guess what, retards.. the constitution was the creation of the federal slavemaster that has denied americans freedom for the last 200 years...wake up, you stupid brainwashed slaves
longfootbuddy 6 months ago
Wow, a lot of the Reichties on here are having a hemorrhage over the fact that what George Moron Jr. is saying that the U.S. don't torture......They hemorrhaging over the fact that Danny Glover is telling the truth.....That the U.S. is/was torturing, and that their fealess Moron leader was lying.....But like all good Reichties they have to create a distraction........
whyputaname 11 months ago
I would love to hear what he has to say about obama now
vetttech1999 1 year ago
Danny don't you have the rights to ALL GOD's DANGERS!! This is a film that needs to be made!! and for all you who dis Danny may you get the Bobby Hutton treatment!!
vivascargill 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We will not find justice at the hands of corrupt judges. (See YouTube videos) Judge to Judge on Illegal Payments to Judges / Evil Triangle of Court Corruption / Richard fine / Dr Shirley Moore slush funds /SBX 211. To end this title wave of corruption in our country must start with the corrupt judges. We can not bring evidence of corruption to corrupt judges. Los Angeles Superior Court judges are illegally and unconstitutionally taking 50,000.00 each for a total of 23 million per year.
danielcooper1000 1 year ago
commie celebretard = Danny Glover!
eyenya 1 year ago
@eyenya eyeinyaear = common repiggietard
I'm guessin' a fuckin' imbecile like you wouldn't know a 'commie' if he kicked ya in yer trucknutz! moron. also :)
oneirishpoet 1 year ago
Danny Glover is a punk haha. He never read the Constitution. He certainly read the Communist Manifesto tho!
pingpongking 1 year ago
Glover is definitely a commie and isn't afraid to admit it. I'll never understand how rich celebretards can embrace the very ideas that espouse anti-wealth and anti-individualism.
wilberswilbers 2 years ago
@wilberwilbers Danny was in the ditches with the Black Panthers--you may not have liked them but Danny was with them--but if you will accept a good word from me a non-rich commie,you are exactly right! These celeb commies drive me nuts--you might change your opinion of us Reds if you read about the lives of non-celeb commies Hosea Hudson black sharecropper Unionj organizers--but you are exactly right! Even if you remain anti-red you are an honorable opponent,
vivascargill 2 years ago
hahahaha glover is a communist read his book. you got your 200 bucks danny go home now
jmurdainc88 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WE ARE BEING PERSECUTED IN THE SAME LIKENESS AND SPOKE TO ARAR'S WIFE DIRECTLY:
CIA /KKK TARGETING OUR PERSONS for abduction on behalf of McCain admin- youtube(dot)com/watch?v=0RezG0KwH_I
Our message to Obama: youtube(dot)com/watch?v=_sfObgs3GGg and
CIA EXPOSED IN TORTURE youtube(dot)com/watch?v=x02fiU6S1-Q
Center For Constitutional Rights must respond we are waiting.
AJames1000 2 years ago
WE ARE BEING PERSECUTED IN THE SAME LIKENESS AND SPOKE TO ARAR'S WIFE DIRECTLY:
CIA /KKK TARGETING OUR PERSONS for abduction on behalf of McCain admin- youtube(dot)com/watch?v=0RezG0KwH_I
Our message to Obama: youtube(dot)com/watch?v=_sfObgs3GGg and
CIA EXPOSED IN TORTURE youtube(dot)com/watch?v=x02fiU6S1-Q
Center For Constitutional Rights must respond we are waiting.
AJames1000 2 years ago
Danny Glover defeated the Predator
warhulk2 2 years ago
Danny Glover = Epic Fail!
Eekhoornhoer 2 years ago
What the ??????? You voted Obama into office and he is violating the Constitution at breakneck speed. Wealth redistribution, bailouts, class wars, and universal healthcare are ALL unconstitutional. Look it up, you hypocrites.
tuckt65 2 years ago 6
BertGriffin88 3 years ago
wow danny glover go away
The2ndAmendmentGuy 3 years ago
Keep up Bush..those fat richy arabs do not care for their bro and sis..just do what you must to do.."Big Great Israel" is your Holy Land..you allready have half of that,but be careful..human beings are not sheeps..they have brains,and you are so stupid to do this job..you are burned New World Disorder and zionism with 9/11,and sheeps will wake up soon,so you and your devil(devil bless you) could not fight against AllMighty God!
New World Order will stick right in your fathers stinky ass!
prahipepeo 3 years ago
I hope you sheeps in America wake up soon enough
we also were sheeps in Europw what resultet in 2. World War, and the 3. WW isnt far away
Bring these warcriminals to trial....
Georgthewarcriminal 3 years ago 11
Danny Glover was on the guest list for rhe annual meeting at Bohemien Grove
BornWithTesticles 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch michael badnaricks constitution class on google video or youtube
bigjon1359 3 years ago
"If people become sheep you get a government of wolves" - Murrow
wbradd3797 3 years ago 3
And when assholes speak asses listen!
khump5 3 years ago
Kucinich or Ron Paul folks! Don't vote for "the lesser of evils".
Don't throw your vote away.
MusclecarsMeditation 4 years ago 9
Vote for Ron Paul and save our Constitution
rilla825 4 years ago 6
Game over. The zionist bankers and thier shills
win everytime. They always do.
War is a racket.
And they are the best at playing the sheep.
theone23ord 4 years ago
The "Bush" is rotting the roots of our land. TAKE HIM OUT OF OFFICE NOW!!!
VisionReality 4 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
These 7 voted to kill Kucinich's bill on 11/6 to impeach Cheney, so they need to CHANGE their positions and fulfill their oath of office to defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign AND domestic: Howard Berman (CA-28), Artur Davis (AL-07), William Delahunt (MA-10), Zoe Lofgren (CA-16), Jerrold Nadler (NY-08), Linda Sanchez (CA-39), and Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL-20). Find them online and send emails, make phone calls; Put the pressure on for IMPEACHMENT!
wiskawind 4 years ago
John Edwards 2008!
nadeau1064 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE!! GOOGLE!!!
"Freedom to fascism" or "zeitgeist" watch
video
to find the truth
ron paul 2008
boxybrown44 4 years ago
Ron Paul 2008!
BTKkillah 4 years ago
Bush and the Republican Congress (from 2000 until 2006) fucked our country beyond belief. The new DEMOCRATIC congress can't get anything done because BUSH VETOes everything.
DEMOCRATS can't be any worse than the PAST 7 years of REPUBLICANTS!!!
Republicans = NOT ONE SINGLE SUCCESS in the past 7 years. That's why they are already attacking the Democrats.
Republicans are liars, cheaters and thieves. That's why they are already attacking, because they have no successes to promote.
darkciti2 4 years ago 4
Dude, you've become of the sheeple and you have no idea how the New World Order works. Clinton and his CFR buddies want you dead so they can have their prostitutes and power in peace with no one looking over their shoulders. Watch ENDGAME on Google Video or youtube. PS I said the same thing you did in '92. Clinton has as much blood on his hands as Bush.
petrusprimus 4 years ago
pp-BusHtiler has genocide on his war criminal hands with the USA murder/mutilation of 1,000,000 & the displacement of 5,000,000 Iraqi innocent elders, women & children.The USA military weapons' economy, along with it's imperialist colonial puppet gov'ts around the world, are run by ruthless, hideously greedy selfish bastards here in the U.S.There are NO DEMOCRACIES in the USA kingdom, including America where the wealthy control the brainwashed masses.Ur the one being duped
warhater 3 years ago 2
Danny Glover comments June '06; " Fidel Castro is a man if honor, vision and compassion".- Danny Boy is one misguided individual.
label1877 4 years ago
*of
label1877 4 years ago
People need to wake the hell up! Stop blaming the Bush administration. Who do you think passed all the evil laws that Bush has used? The corrupt members of Congress, Democrat and Republicans. They voted for the Iraq War. They voted for the PATRIOT Act. They voted for the Military Commisions Act. Throw all the bums out. Not just Bush.
Ron Paul 2008
Quasifonix 4 years ago 6
Amen! Everyone is blasting Bush, that he lied to the people, well he can only go on the information that was gicin to him, also, everyone seems to be blaming him for this war, well excuse me, isent there a checks a blance system set up in this country were the presidents actions have to be approved? So why are we mad at him? Why arent you upset with the people who approved his war act?
sonofdisaster13 4 years ago
I AM WITH YOU ON THIS....I know the it's not just him. The corrupt members of Congress, Democrat and Republicans & many others are the reason why the bills get passed & also because of not enought of us going a shit about what goes on passed our daily lives. PLEASE GET INVOLVED PEOPLE or our land will be someone else. I am talking about another country.
VisionReality 4 years ago 5
legalize the constitution vote for
RON PAUL 2008!
aircooledvw62 4 years ago 4
Uphold the will of We the People or be excused.
Stop and Think. Truth to Power.
Power to the People. Give Peace a Chance.
kevkro64 4 years ago 2
I'm surprised Danny Glover stopped sucking Hugo Chavez's cock long enough to make this commercial.
joba606 4 years ago
If you do not defend the Constitution now then be prepared to be rounded up soon as a political dissident during a midnight raid on your home and be sent away to a FEMA Concentration camp. They have already been built. Just Google:
FEMA CAMPS
AlexJonesRules 4 years ago 4
I agree with the message, NOT the messenger.
utubepunk 4 years ago
If you like the Constitution, you'll LOVE Ron Paul!
GonzoPaulitician1 4 years ago 6
If you agree with this ad, visit ronpaul2008 (dot) com and donate.
goodbyegoodhair 4 years ago 6
ron paul supports the 14th amendment but some corpartation have indorsed this amendment for them selves. this amendment was for all people not the big bissness alet/bankers/lobbyest that run around congess with thier appreations bills/like holburten oil tycuns.
illbesure4 4 years ago
Dear Mr. Glover you and me have the right to change it like lou dobbs and joe madison said the other day they changed there party ticket to read indpentent because both partys have their own agenda's and can't be bothered by the people of the colonies thaat put the people in to the elected office witch they hold, well I could go on and on but Danny im in Seatle I will wave my ron paul revolution on inter state I-5 for you and me God Bless You:)
illbesure4 4 years ago
DANNY GLOVER< YOU SUCK< thats all the time I will waste on you , you piece of SHIT
couttsjajr 4 years ago
i will only waste one second on you loser: FUCK YOU
krattax 4 years ago
very original, you BITCH
couttsjajr 4 years ago
krattax,very original, you bitch
couttsjajr 4 years ago
what a joke...this coming from a useful idiot actor who praises a marxist dictator who wouldnt let an ad like this show on one of venezuelas many state run tv stations.... truly pathetic.
JuMBOGooCH 4 years ago
LOL, I just find it hilarious to see Danny Glover "support" the constitution. This is one of the many actor douchebags who visits with Hugo Chavez, one of the biggest civil liberties violators in the world.
Thorbie 4 years ago
I heard this ad was banned from FOX "News". No surprise if thats true.
Nicholai420 4 years ago
Danny Glover is a great guy! He has also done a lot of activism to give voice to the Palestinians, which is a daring, and much needed, thing to do in the U.S.
Arlo003 4 years ago
Oops, I mixed you up with someone else, looks like. Perhaps you were talking about my first-hand experience with spanking. Earlier comments apply to BushCultists.
But I do believe spanking is bad. If you're not smart enough to come up with nonviolent ways to discipline your children, such as taking away their Wii, then you deserve to be alienated by your children when they grow up. Such is justice. Enjoy your (collective) sunset years alone.
armadilloze 4 years ago
The Supreme court has already ruled that the U.S. Constitution doesn't apply to citizens.
Yes, you read that correctly...
google 'ultimate delusion Stephen Ames'
truthtrekker 4 years ago
So Paul supports child beating? He opposes laws that protect children? Only parents have rights? Children can't vote, which explains a lot of winger policies.
Here's one for a Paul lover: Why not privatize religion? Just get government out of it entirely. No more "special rights," tax exemptions, AKA subsidizing churches who now get free fire and police protection and protection from "terrists" by redistributing our tax dollars to them. They don't need welfare from your tax dollars, right?
armadilloze 4 years ago
you're right about privatizing religion- for a church to take 501c3 status it means the government controls was is preached from the pulpit. It is a form of mind control- sermons and readings are twisted to appease the beast system and maintain 501c3 tax exemption in a system based purely on fraud in the first place. That is why the 501c3 churches never speak out against abortion or the Iraq War they have sold their souls to the beast for a tax exemption
truthtrekker 4 years ago 2
I don't QUITE agree with that. Here's what I say: Churches get free local, state, and national services. Their presence adds to the number of fire stations needed, for example. You pay more taxes to cover the additional load, so in essence you are subsidizing a religion you may not agree with. If they can afford those huge palaces, they don't need our tax dollars. It's basically freeloading and welfare for the rich, as well as the establishment of religion by government.
armadilloze 4 years ago
That's what Ron Paul defends. Boy, you don't have an idea of what you are saying, do you?
antoniocostaamaral 4 years ago 2
Rupaul supports taxing churches so our tax burden is less and they stop freeloading off of us? And he's against BushCult's war too? Too bad he wants to take away our EPA, FDA, and SEC so voters have less say about their everyday affairs and must leave those decisions to fatcats in NEW YORK CITY!
armadilloze 4 years ago
RP does not support taxing churches neither giving them money. Period. And he supports deregulation so that governments must compete for the better laws, and serve the people - not otherwise, with one rule for all the land. That is called fascism.
antoniocostaamaral 4 years ago
OK, so he won't tax churches, including one here under investigation that can afford its on private jet. How much more taxes does he want us to pay to subsidize government services to churches, including, say, air traffic controllers for their private jets? :) How much more do YOU want to pay?
armadilloze 4 years ago
Answering your question, none. Churches and corporations and individuals should pay the services they consume. That way its nobody's business - either than their followers - if they have private jets or not. You are right, there are many ways you can subsidize at the expense of taxpayers.
antoniocostaamaral 4 years ago
"Sounds like you just described yourself!"
No shit, Sherlock! I'm a patriot, I will defend the Constitution you wingers are shredding with your "unitary executive." Any of you traitors entering MY neighborhood after a coup better be wearing the kind of body armor the incompetent chickenhawk neocons denied our troops in Iraq.
armadilloze 4 years ago
Yeah, let's get direct control of our environment out of the hands of voters by eliminating the EPA. Union Carbide and ExxonMobile know what's best for you peons.
My parents spanked me a lot. When I left home, there were no goodbyes, no hugs. They got no birthday presents, no anniversary presents, no phone calls, no get well cards over the years. Mom apologized about a month before she died, but that was too late. Child abuse has a price we all pay.
armadilloze 4 years ago
Well, I spent 10 years in Houston and remember Paul as being a nutball everyone made fun of. I was amazed to find out he was still around and in this election cycle as a candidate fpr prez.
I used to work with two libertarians. They opposed speed limits, seat belts, and child safety seats, among other positions. Is Paul like that too?
armadilloze 4 years ago
this is not a left or right issue. It is the issue of the American people. It is an issue that affects us all. It is stomping on Freedoms that up until 01 we had. Realize this and your on your way to the answers you seek.
MoreintelligentthanU 4 years ago 3
you're on your own*
moliver000 4 years ago
Danny is a hardcore socialist. He want you and I to be slaves to our government (Healthcare is just one tool). Slaves with privacy rights?
He's either a moron or evil. Hard to tell.
VerbotenDingleberry 4 years ago
What a Bozo.
bobbrandy2007 4 years ago
GJ Danny....
robot4001 4 years ago
Don't boycott. Destroy!
pos151 4 years ago
"GET EM RIGS"
ps3thug 4 years ago
Danny Glover shredding the constitution? Is that our constitution or Venezuela's? Danny Glover wouldn't know freedom if it bit him in a sensitive area. This guy kisses Hugo Chavez on the lips. He is totally socialist. He should support Bush because he is doing Glover's job for him.
worldtechguy 4 years ago
we need you Ron Paul!
haircutname9 4 years ago
KPIX in San Fran picked it up too. They interviewed people. It's on their web site. It's a good report. The woman's final excuses are, 1) The Ron Paul contingent was making the others uncomfortable, and 2) they weren't really invited anyway.
JiveDadson 4 years ago
Oops. I posted that to the wrong video. Sorry about that.
JiveDadson 4 years ago
A TV station in Iowa, KCRG, is featuring the story. Google it.
JiveDadson 4 years ago
Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul
The Tea Part Cometh!!
sistim2005 4 years ago 3
Agreed. I don't mean to seem condescending, but this is 2007 and the parties have swapped "poor people" quite a few times since then. They come in handy for votes. I'm not under the illusion that any of the current candidates are going cure poverty, but at least some(Ron Paul, Kucinich) have proven that they would try.
pseudomonojk 4 years ago
They are the ones that got us into this quagmire of a war so that they could feel better about being fat, ignorant, wife-beating, racist fuckheads. All so they could pretend that they knew what they were talking about when Bush spoon fed them his bile.
pseudomonojk 4 years ago
That was kind of an angry short sided rant. To clarify, the Toby Keith fans didn't LITERALLY get us into the war. Plenty of Democratic politicians voted for it as well as the Patriot Act. I don't claim to be a Democrat. But I don't think anyone will forget the way anyone dissenting from the Freedom Fries world view was treated as a traitor. Still pissed about that, and I think it's their fucking turn to feel like shit now that the truth about this war is evident.
pseudomonojk 4 years ago
Seems that all of the "Republicans" that have posted here are the same that have always been Bush loyalists. They have no original thought, but rather have to repeat whatever bullshit Limbaugh tells them. They are exactly the type of people RepubliCONs prey on because they are morons.
pseudomonojk 4 years ago
Yes, Rush himself said it best: "The next time somebody says you can't think for yourself, here's what you tell them..."
armadilloze 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I cant believe this asshole defeated a predator.
intheshitter 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
danny glover is a stupid communist nigger
jimmycorp 4 years ago
damn. FYI.. communists tend not to defend The Constitution.
cyberprunes 4 years ago 7
Danny Glover is anti-Second Amendment though. Hypocrite!
kevin108 4 years ago 2
To be fair, the 2nd ammendment has always been up for debate on it's actual meaning.
Hypocrite is a bit strong.
cyberprunes 4 years ago 3
Holy Crap Danny Glover!
misformurphy 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This isn't pro-constitution, its pro-terrorist.
MLFLYukon 4 years ago
You make so much sense...
fluffyv 4 years ago
WTF? when did this ad mention anything about terrorism?
but i will admit it's a badly made ad.
tc88888888 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The commercial is against sending terrorists to guantanamo. its against interrogation of those terrorists at guantanamo. they want terrorists to have the same rights as American citizens. Hence, the commercial is pro-terrorist.
MLFLYukon 4 years ago
WRONG. They send "suspected terrorists" to Guantanamo. The definition of terrorist is becoming ever more broadened and nebulous. It is getting to the point where anyone can be labeled a suspected terrorist without hard evidence and locked away in Gitmo without being charged.
cyberprunes 4 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ummmmm....since when have people captured during war, that are not american citizens protected under the US constitution....you go to another country and do something to get arrested, you won't be protected by their constitution, or OURS!!
gendolookin 4 years ago
The point is if it is illegal for us to torture it is illegal to torture ANYONE. Not just if you happened to be born here.Moron.
shug7272 4 years ago 9
So you wont mind us torturing or slaughtering American citizens (We're not as barbaric as you guys, this is purely hypothetical)? But I think this ad should be about the Geneva conventions but maybe that doesn't resonate quite as loudly as the constitution with Americans.
jpbalkenende 4 years ago
here here! and again I challenge anyone to provide evidence of torture.
jferrant 4 years ago
the idea that communism and fascism are on opposite sides of the political spectrum should be revised. both ideologies deny personal rights (a social factor) while fascism still supports business and communism shits all over it
and plus ppl need to get 50 years of this democracy vs. communism bullshit out of their heads b/c communism is a type of economy whereas democracy is a type of government. if anything it should be capitalism vs. communism
nunyabuizness 4 years ago 2
Time to end this nazi's in power.
Which includes corrupt media, politics, medicine, education, science and technology
thinkofafuckingname 4 years ago
Lets make a new constitution!
buff21chief 4 years ago
One solution: Join The Ron Paul Army.
MiniZiper 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ron Paul sucks as well.
emusylate 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
a few things about this. the US constitution applies to US citizens. I defy anyone to show evidence of authorized torture to any of the detainees. the stuff everyone has heard about was unauthorized and has been dealt with. last,if any of the animals currently in US custody were released, you can bet they will soon be recaptured,killed or worse end up killing US troops or citizens.The President didn't do everything right, far from it, but the alternative is just unacceptable.
jferrant 4 years ago
"the US constitution applies to US citizens."
Yea, and the fact is that actual citizens of the US are also being detained. No trials. Our privacy and civil liberties are being threatened.
And I don't care if you're a citizen or not, you shouldn't be tortured - ESPECIALLY from my government. Let's rise above, shall we?
cbreaker 4 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
care to tell me who these US citizens are? other than the ones who renounced their citizenship that is. also please present evidence of torture.
jferrant 4 years ago
What animals? I thought we were talking about people... not zoos.. oh wait, are you doing that thing where you pretend someone isn't human so it doesn't seem as bad to torture them?
KOSmurfy 4 years ago 9
This comment has received too many negative votes show
not pretending they are not human. they are not. these are the same people who take a steak knife and behead someone just because you believe in a different god then they do.
jferrant 4 years ago
So you believe that everyone in Guantanamo is a terrorist? How simple of you.
Mark73 4 years ago 7
Under the patriot act the gov't can declare anyone an enemy combatant. So let's say you "annoy" the Bush admininstration...BAM-off you go to Gitmo with no warrant, no trial, and no habeas corpus, forever.
valoss 4 years ago 2
"they are not human"
Of course they're human. Why insist on calling them subhuman or animals if your intent is not simply to make them easier to demonize? It saddens me to see that people who don't believe in human rights such as yourself have any say in the political process.
"the same people who take a steak knife and behead someone"
Since you seem to be into demanding evidence to back up claims, let's see some from you... unless you're the hypocritical imbecile that I think you are.
KOSmurfy 4 years ago 2
The constitution is supposed to keep the government from doing certain things to ANYONE. The word "citizen" appears in only a few places. Get a copy of it and search for the word. ALL MEN are endowed with certain unalienable rights. The prohibition of denial of habeas corpus says nothing about citizenship.
JiveDadson 4 years ago
Please don't confuse the BushCultists with the facts. Facts only get them all defensive and stuff and they embarrass themselves.
armadilloze 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
A few things about this.One the constitution of the US applies to US citizens. Two,I defy anyone to show evidence of authorized torture of the detainees in US custody.The incidents that everyone has heard about were unauthorized and have been dealt with.Last, if the animals that are in these prisons were released,you can bet they would soon be recaptured,killed or worse, be responsible for the deaths of US troops or citizens.the alternative is just unacceptable.
jferrant 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nice spokesman for a Constitution defense!. Danny Glover poses, hugs and receives money from Hugo Chavez, a dictator who as NO respect for his own constitution, or the US for that matter. Hypocrite.
elguevote 4 years ago
IM ARGUIN ON TEH INTERWEBS LOL
earthwalker84 4 years ago
Oh noes! What ever will we do without watching a bunch of overpaid jocks run around on a field?!
neodorian 4 years ago
Excellent
marcellogentile1 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Danny who?
Moron. Torture is often justified. Reality is a hard thing for people who make a living pretending.
VerbotenDingleberry 4 years ago
I think John McCain might have some real life experience with this issue. But I guess torture's good if you need false confessions to confirm what you want to hear. And just because Glover's an actor doesn't mean he's not informed.
barnroad 4 years ago 8
Whoever he may be supporting, the video is saying the right thing about Bush and the present U.S. administration. Why would anyone want to quibble about that? If more people whose opinions are listened to, would stand up and be counted, perhaps people would listen. For the truth's sake: drop your pseudonyms and stand up and be counted for who you are. Anthony Lawson
alawson911 4 years ago 4
Danny Glover lends his fame to great things.
DrakeMagnum 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ROTFLMFAO
Utard1 4 years ago
im not sure about this video. while although i agree with the beginning portion of this video, i had to stop mid course when i saw glover's face considering i have personally seen glover's name on a boheiman grove list of invitees. in matter of fact, anyone can. it makes you wonder if this is pressure from below as well as the top??
juliganp 4 years ago 2
Nice Vid
doubt the sheeple will understand it,
seems like you have to talk slow, and bring some pen and paper,
Hey people would you like some truth??
search "Clint Curtis" right here on youtube.
buckle up
realnewsdm 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is unbelieveable that a commy pinko chump like this idiot ACTOR has something to say about the constitution. My last turd knows more about the what our founding fathers wanted than this hollywood turd does.
Utard1 4 years ago
You only reveal your own prejudice by making personal attacks. Would you be willing to address the subject?
Upgeya 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I have addressed it. If you want more, please ask my last turd.
Utard1 4 years ago
Piss on Danny Shithead Glover! He doesn't support the Constitution. It's an embarrassment to hear those words spew out of his mouth like so much bull-diarrhea.
There's not a liberal alive that believes in less government and more individual freedom. If one tells you he does, he's a goddamn liar!
TMWKK 4 years ago
You can make claims, but can you back them up with clear observations free of interpretations?
Upgeya 4 years ago
You want clear observations? The only allow 500 characters here, not 50,000 words!
But, just off the top of my head, what about liberals wanting to take away our right to bear arms? And freedom of speech...they want to make it against the law to offend anybody by speaking the truth. That's why television is so full of lies.
TMWKK 4 years ago
...and how about that "affirmative action" crap. The Constitution is all about using your personal skills, education and talents to advance yourself in life. It says nothing about pushing skilled people to the back of the line because you think your skin color gives you special privileges. That's not Freedom...it's facism!
TMWKK 4 years ago
Then there's taxes...liberals love taking away my earnings to distribute to people whom they think need my money more than I do. And I have to pay school taxes every year, even though I have no kids, so all the little wetback "gangstas" can get a free education in a country they don't even legally belong in. More stinkin' fascism!
I could go on and on, but you'll just make excuses anyhow, so fuck off!
TMWKK 4 years ago 5
actually those are cases of socialism/communism
and i agree its anti free market, anti american, and doesnt even work..
Intangion 4 years ago
Communism is one end of the economic spectrum and fascism is the other. We have to make sure not to swing too far either way. When either the public or private sector has too much influence, the citizens and nation as a whole suffer badly.
neodorian 4 years ago
How is fascism on one end and communism on the other? The left-right paradigm is poorly defined. There is no place for libertarians and anarchists, for example, if fascism is the opposite of communism. If you put fascism at the extreme right, then the trend towards less government exhibited on the right ends in totalitarianism.
paulfor08 4 years ago
Ok. I agree that it is a false dichotomy, but it's a peeve of mine when people equate communism and fascism. When the private sector controls everything you have the same kinds of corruption and abuse that you get when the public sector controls everything.
neodorian 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fascism and Communism are virtually the same. The notion that one is on the "right" and the other is on the "left" is absurd.
paulfor08 4 years ago
you're wrong, Fascism is Corporatism, where the gov is in bed with all of the large corporations. Mussolini even said so and he was a proud fascist.
ebonmonochrome 4 years ago 2
Mussolini said that he controlled the companies. If he controlled them, then he controlled those corporations, then what is the difference between "corporatism" and communism? What exactly is corporatism?
paulfor08 4 years ago
"Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini
Paul is more of a plutocrat. He doesn't think We The People can decide issues for ourselves, like how clean their air is, in the voting booth. Those matters are best left to unelected CEOs in NYC who know what's best for you, right?
armadilloze 4 years ago
No political party calls themselves "fascist" by definition but that doesn't mean they're not controlled by fascists. There's no real difference in our two main parties, other than their propaganda. They're both controlled by corporate lobbyists and Zionists, which is to say, "whoever has the most money to give away".
TMWKK 4 years ago
OK, don't pay school taxes, but also never hire someone who went to as public school and make money off their knowledge. THAT would be freeloading, something for nothing. And never buy from a company that employs public school grads, since you will assisted by them. If you make any use of them, you are a hypocrite and best ignored.
Schools benefit everyone, not just your kids. A little selfish and self-centered (aka conservative), are we?
armadilloze 4 years ago
Armidilloze,
Your logic is flawed. Of course schools benefit everyone, he never stated that they didn't. He is arguing that he must pay for education for those that aren't even asking for it. He is stating for a repeal of the education tax. This does not mean that people will not go to school any longer but rather that anyone who wants to go to school would have to pay for it directly. There is nothing wrong with supporting someone who has done that.
colto 4 years ago
How 'bout anyone who does not support BushCult's war doesn't have to pay for it, and those who do "would have to pay for it directly?" Fair is fair.
"...those that aren't even asking for it... So 6 year olds should decide whether or not they go to school?
In a democracy, you give and get. We have what we have today as the result of voting for over 200 years. If you don't like our form of government, what form do you like?
armadilloze 4 years ago
I start off what's turned out to be the most interesting conversation on this board, so here you gotta come with the most patently ridiculous comment I've seen all week. I don't have the time, space or inclination to list all the things wrong with your perception of fair behavior. Please lay off the T.V. and start learning about reality.
CapnFlix 4 years ago
Ooops, I screwed up. I'm also TMWKK. I forgot to switch identies before I posted.
CapnFlix 4 years ago
Translation: "I have no logical comeback for that, so I'll duck the question and make meaningless personal attacks instead."
OK, if you want to fight BushCult's war with "other people's money" instead of yours (and other people's children), at least ENLIST. I'm a veteran who volunteered many decades ago, so what are you, a chickenshit hypocrite?
armadilloze 4 years ago
LOL...my comment needs no translation. You can take every word completely literally.
What's really hilarious is that you accuse me of dodging the issue with "meaningless personal attacks", then in the next paragraph call me a "chickenshit HYPOCRITE". ROFLMAO! If the irony of that is too over your head, you're even dumber than I thought. HAHAHAHAHAHA
TMWKK 4 years ago
I didn't say you were a "chickenshit hypocrite," I asked you if you were one. Got my answer, thanks!
OK, if you're a Paul lover, then you are against BushCult's war and therefore not a hypocrite if you do not enlist.
armadilloze 4 years ago
Okay it may not be 'freedom' but it's not fascism at all. Don't throw around red alert words without knowing how to use them.
Alegoo92 4 years ago
"Fascism"
...stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.
They could shorten the whole definition to read "Hillary Clinton"
Don't tell me how to use words. Especially when you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
TMWKK 4 years ago
Funny, I read that and think a better definition would be "George W. Bush". Oh, and by the way, fascism is marked by being extremely right-wing (look it up in the dictionary), Hillary Clinton is a left-wing democrat.
Jhelgers 4 years ago
Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush...what's the damn difference? If you don't think they're all working hand-in-hand, you're simply one of the hordes of brainwashed "sheeple" that is helping our country enter the third world by ignorance alone.
TMWKK 4 years ago
As for your definition of "fascism", I just looked it up in about 20 online dictionaries. The only one that uses the term "right-wing" is the Oxford Dictionary. That's a British rag. The Brits are so close to communism that they may as well just start calling themselves that. Even their dictionaries are full of commie propaganda. They don't believe in Freedom of Speech, so their definitions should be ignored.
TMWKK 4 years ago
The oxford dictionary is a British Rag. ROFL you are a giant ass.
cyberprunes 4 years ago
Liberals do tend to call people who tell the truth names like "giant ass".
CapnFlix 4 years ago
giant asses tend to be idiots that talk shit about liberals
pseudomonojk 4 years ago
No, a giant ass is what you have hanging off the back of your pelvis. HAHAHAHAHA
TMWKK 4 years ago
So what's your M.O., TMWKK? An Anarchist? A Nihilist? Just another troll acting like an ass for your own amusement?
pseudomonojk 4 years ago
So you don't think calling the Oxford dictionary
communist propaganda is rediculous and extreme?
cyberprunes 4 years ago
Well I do feel that it is necessary to ask what exactly it is you have done to not be one of these "sheeple". I admit all I've done is protest the war and write people in political office expressing my dissatisfaction with the current situation, but as any anti-bush protester is not allowed to express their opinion at bush rallies, I have little recourse. Oh, and I probably won't reply, because
Jhelgers 4 years ago
TMWKK: Fascism is exactly the definition you provided above.
At the same time, affirmative action or any initiative aimed at jump-starting minority groups or other individuals in no way plays into the idea of fascism: which as an authoritative government cares very little for social rights.
Alegoo92 4 years ago
The roots of the term fascism go back to the military dictator Mussolini of Italy. How do the totalitarian actions of him and other dictators of the ilk (Stalin, Lenin, Hirohito and etc) play into liberal programs like affirmative action?
Please... You're obviously ignorant to this particular topic- and apparently very angry about your politcal beliefs. Try to be kinder and you won't appear so arrogant (especially when you're completely wrong)
Alegoo92 4 years ago
Gee, that sound exactly like BushCult! One tiny example, "forcible suppression of opposition." Look how many peaceable people have been arrested for words on their T-shirts and bumper stickers at BushCult rallies.
Why do Loyal Bushies hate freedom that much? Why don't they just move to China?
See John Dean's book on authoritarianism, "Conservatives Without Conscience," or google "John Dean authoritarianism" for more examples. Sad for America and freedom.
armadilloze 4 years ago
Neo-Nazis were all for affirmative action until others wanted it too. If you supported only Whites getting jobs and using whatever water fountain they chose, then you were for affirmative action. If you only want it for yourself, then you are a hypocrite and your opinion doesn't matter to real Americans.
armadilloze 4 years ago