I think this is a great cover. Of course it's always going to be different to Keane's original, but different isn't necessarily worse.
And as much as I am a Keane fan myself, for those putting them on a pedestal - a few years ago Keane themselves went in the Live Lounge on Radio 1 and did a cover of 'With or Without You' by U2, and it was absolutely horrendous!
Nope, didn't like that at all. Of course you could never cover this song and make it better than the original, but you can still make a good cover. And this wasn't, it really wasn't! Sorry Sugababes, but that was not good at all.
surprised! ive never heard the sugarbabes sing live intune...ever. its always painful to listen to or watch, but they did alright. harmonies were very nice but the girl singing the choruses was very annoying!
they've sang this really well, if keane covered one of the sugababes songs it wouldnt be as good! theese to bands are like apples and banana's, good in their own way! and yeah the backing music is pretty cool!
that's not the case, sugababes don't make songs in the style of keane, even in that case keane would do it great xD... Keane version will be always better :P
that may be your opionion, but really they are just to very different songs,if Keane covered a Sugababes song, im sure we'd all think that Sugababes version was better, thats just the way it goes lovie
I agree with hunand, Keane´s performance is unique, but the girls are trying to do the best they can, let´s give them a chance...don´t u think?? it´s like a complement to our fantastic band: KEANE
OOH NO. They have converted this song into a horny-palooza. I seriously abhor the way they 'OHH!'. No one could ever make a cover better than Keane themselves.
O MY FUCKING GOD , this is really shitty.. really they can't sing live. I meane, how can they cover such a beautiful song!? i really can't listen to this crap!!! it will never be better than keane's version. KEANE RULEZZZ en tom chaplin is a god
oops, totally different style. these girls seem to really enjoy the last 'wooo'. they sounds fine, but definitely not the way that this song is meant to be
I think this is a great cover. Of course it's always going to be different to Keane's original, but different isn't necessarily worse.
And as much as I am a Keane fan myself, for those putting them on a pedestal - a few years ago Keane themselves went in the Live Lounge on Radio 1 and did a cover of 'With or Without You' by U2, and it was absolutely horrendous!
spider23000 2 years ago
fail!
MightyMike94 2 years ago
LOLOLOLOL
lolatmeganxo 2 years ago
haa
this is soo funny, you guys
take this so seriously!
i bet if the Sugababes amd Keane saw all these comments they'd piss themsleves at most of them! HAHAHA
oxxJEMxxo 2 years ago
I actually think it isn't that bad. I do like Keane's version better. <3
BragneaxStarlight 2 years ago 2
they made it horribly...
Aletzitou 2 years ago
Bitch's
vicrn05 2 years ago
yucky...
sunhiusee121192 2 years ago
KEANE´s ANYWAY BETTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BritLadyS 2 years ago 2
so so ...
aoiuknow 2 years ago
WTF why do bands attempt to cover other peoples songs and just totaly ruin them????? Just don't do it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
007007008plp 2 years ago
its called the radio one live lounge :p
oxxJEMxxo 2 years ago
Nope, didn't like that at all. Of course you could never cover this song and make it better than the original, but you can still make a good cover. And this wasn't, it really wasn't! Sorry Sugababes, but that was not good at all.
LolligaLykke 2 years ago
surprised! ive never heard the sugarbabes sing live intune...ever. its always painful to listen to or watch, but they did alright. harmonies were very nice but the girl singing the choruses was very annoying!
flyaninnocentlife 2 years ago 2
Prefer the original but this isn't too bad.
MancLyns 2 years ago 2
hey, give the babes a chance!
they've sang this really well, if keane covered one of the sugababes songs it wouldnt be as good! theese to bands are like apples and banana's, good in their own way! and yeah the backing music is pretty cool!
oxxJEMxxo 3 years ago 4
that's not the case, sugababes don't make songs in the style of keane, even in that case keane would do it great xD... Keane version will be always better :P
Aletzitou 2 years ago
that may be your opionion, but really they are just to very different songs,if Keane covered a Sugababes song, im sure we'd all think that Sugababes version was better, thats just the way it goes lovie
oxxJEMxxo 2 years ago
nah keane version would be better even in covering... xD...
Aletzitou 2 years ago
the vocals are alright not great
but I LOVE LOVE LOVE the instrumental / backing music part!!!! its brill!
jojomolojo 3 years ago 2
hippo
Jtheslug 3 years ago
I agree with hunand, Keane´s performance is unique, but the girls are trying to do the best they can, let´s give them a chance...don´t u think?? it´s like a complement to our fantastic band: KEANE
atapia77 3 years ago 6
i agree that the way they 'ooh' became horn-palooza. it make the song sounds like some junk ._. KEANE VERSION, WAY BETTER!
thahbianchi 3 years ago
keane version is the best ever no doubt but this sugababes cover isn't that bad.
hunand 3 years ago 3
OOH NO. They have converted this song into a horny-palooza. I seriously abhor the way they 'OHH!'. No one could ever make a cover better than Keane themselves.
AlternkeaneJunkie 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this versian is way better!
Steffxxx 3 years ago
haaaaaaaaa...!! whyyyyyyyyyyyyyy this girls kill this great song!!!...
nooo.. keane ins the best!!!.. this is not a cover for this girls.. mabe is not the right song!!!
Groovalisticband 3 years ago 2
no muchomejor keane que estas hueonas
falgar001 3 years ago 2
no lo hacen mal , pero amo mas a keane, mas a keane, keane is better ,
mikilla25 3 years ago
why are you people down thumbing the people that like the keane one better?
This version is really bad anyways so Let them be right you fuckers
probably ganna get thumb down for this too
TasteyCookies 3 years ago 2
I'm not a Sugababes fan or anything, but for some reason I find it cute that they covered it.
jennaris 3 years ago 5
yeah, the cover sucked, but credit to them for picking it! (;
LolligaLykke 2 years ago
O MY FUCKING GOD , this is really shitty.. really they can't sing live. I meane, how can they cover such a beautiful song!? i really can't listen to this crap!!! it will never be better than keane's version. KEANE RULEZZZ en tom chaplin is a god
KKmusic93 3 years ago
I think this isn't a serious cover, XD. They were just having some fun.
LON009 3 years ago 9
oops, totally different style. these girls seem to really enjoy the last 'wooo'. they sounds fine, but definitely not the way that this song is meant to be
enchinya 3 years ago
I don't like this song tbh, but I prefer this version as I love Sugababes & the harmonies in the chorus are brilliant :)
MusicIsMe16x 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
totally agree, thats my fav part of this song, i think keanes is okay but this is alot better and if they done it seriously i think it would do well
dan28990 3 years ago
They butchered this song. My god, do they even know what the lyrics mean? I'm gonna bet all my money on HELL NO.
amerkins 3 years ago
Nah Mate
This Version Is So Better
x
sam2403 3 years ago
I'm sticking to the Keane version... haha.
amerkins 3 years ago
And Im Stayin With This One ;)
sam2403 3 years ago
keane ftw, sugababes are terrible live singers. havnt got a clue about this song. they butchered this song. made it sound like a choir!
tom chaplin is a god
lordjoesnow 3 years ago