If you don't trust a particular company then buy only products that have a stamp of approval by a private regulating company of your choice. Find companies that have a good reputation to buy from. Vote with your dollar.
The truth is just because you have the government regulating companies doesn't mean they are being regulated properly. 9/11 happened and we had plenty of defense spending at the time. Now, instead of firing our government we give them more of our money to protect us!!?
They should send this girl out to classrooms to inspire schoolchildren with the story of how she rose in the journalism profession by being a hot moron - it would teach them all about the fantastic egalitarian world we live in. She's actually a walking indictment of journalism degrees; people like her should be turned away at the university gates.
You cannot seperate government from economics. The government taxes the people and takes money away from them. Sometimes, the government well take from Peter and give it to Paul.
By doing this, there are economic laws that into play whether you care to admit it or not. Money that goes to the government (ie jobs, welfare, etc) is taken away from the private sector. As taxes goes up there is a tendency of business to change their behavior...ie outsource, fire people, downsize, or quit.
Hey All,Please check out The Subjective Perspective,youtube or google em',and check out their song Dead Peasant Uprising...it is been revered as another powerful anthem for the Occupy Movement.PeaceandLoveandLight-The Subjective Perspective is a true working class voice, born working poor, and has become one of the most well received duo's singing for the 99%.Treat yourself and enjoy Dead Peasant Uprising by The Subjective Perspective. The Live version and Edited Video r amazing!
This reporter has a valid argument. What Matt Damon fails to realize is an "affective teacher" isn't acknowledged by establishing how much he or she wants to teach and loves to do it. What Matt Damon also fails to realize is their is a HUGE shortage of affective teachers in the school system. They don't fire incompetent teachers in school systems. They stay for 20 years getting worse as the years go on and retire with benefits at the tax payers expense. The kids are the real victims.
Everyone is complaining that these people are talking about this only because they are hot, but they aren't that hot. They are talking about an important issue because they are reporters, and they are thin thin and well dressed and have makeup because they are reporters on television.
Their jobs are not to add intellect, their jobs are to communicate something and get people to pay attention. Isn't it working?
@mattakudesu It's more complicated than that, it'd be ridiculously simple if that's all it as.
My parents are both professors, and they both have tenure, they need that tenure to have job guarantee while they fulfill academic side-obligations, that are part of being professors. They don't get paid all that much for that, if at all. They can't do both, but both are necessary, Tenure is not given easily.
It only applies to senior professors anyways. Read the wikipedia article on academic tenure
They both got their jobs because they're both hot. What a shame. Someone with much greater intellect would have produced a much more thought provoking show.
The number one indicator of whether a child will do well in school is whether or not their parents are involved with their schoolwork. Saying that tenure is making it harder for us to get rid of bad teachers is a different statement then saying "good" teachers should be rewarded for success. How do you measure the success of a teacher? What if the parents in a particular school district are not very involved in their child's academics? Should we punish the teachers for that?
Someone loving to teach doesn't allow them to be a shitty teacher. The god damn unions keep awful teachers in their jobs long past when they should have fired.
Michelle Fields---money stuffed in her clothes---and in return she shills for the "Libertarians", who would actually be much worse than the Republicans on everything except foreign policy and the drug war.
There is not a dime worth a difference between Republicans and Democrats. Obama and Bush are both big on war, taking our civil liberties away, and spending us into bankrupty.
Libertarians are fiscially sane....conservatives and liberals are not.
Michelle Fields is one of these low-intellligence "reporters" who is a paid shill for corporate interests. Given her obviously limited understanding of how things work, Fields is probably clueless as to where her money comes from.
Fields gets her money from the "Reason Foundation". This is a shill group, supported by very wealthy and greedy people, and corporations that want this propaganda shoved down people's throats.
She knows ZERO about teachers. Bad ones get fired. Fields lies.
Libertarians do not support corporate weflare. Libertarians want to shrink the size of government...thus limiting corporation's ability to abuse government.
Corporations hate free markets because it forces them to compete. Corporations prefer to hire lobbyists, bribe congressmen, write regulations that favor them, and create artificial monopolies protected by government.
So what kind of welfare do libertarians support? Or do they just want to let the unfortunate, ill or helpless die? Do they hope for compassion and charity of their fellow men regardless of your sex, race, sexuality etc. (so common, especially in the USA XD). I always hear about what they want but never any solution for the problems that will arise when we have libertarism/anarchy in place. Because lets face it, there is not much of a difference between the two.
@gideondavid30 well with that logic, why have government in the first place? I don't see how the size of government is the issue, its the elected officials -- the politicians who get into the job for corporate sponsorships.... for money, rather than serving the public. if the end of libertarianism is to abolish government, then i agree... but our society is FAR from that ideal. it's going to take an immense amount of education and entirely new institutions to get there
Libertarians advocate for constitutional government..ie original intent of the founding fathers.
Education right now, is under the monopoly of the federal government. Considering the fiscal mountatin we are facing, it is only matter of time before the government stronghold is broken.
I agree, society is far from that ideal...but a good smack in the mouth might wake us up.
@gideondavid30 Can we stop with this 'shrink the government' rhetoric. What part of the government would you shrink exactly? I think people have this habit of just throwing out words with presupposed meaning without considering that they mean.
The government needs to govern correctly. Not shrunk. A big government doing the right things is exactly what we need right now.
You can have faith in your government.......when the economy collapses don't be shocked though. You government has failed you and will continually fail you.
@gideondavid30 See this is the problem. You look at everything with THIS government or THAT government. We have an intrinsically corrupt system which is why the political landscape is the way it is. If we had a HUGE government that wasn't corrupt the world economy would look very different. The problem with your view is your assume that it's unfixable, so how do we fix it? We shrink it down. That's counter intuitive.
yes in a perfect world we would angels in office governing mankind. Everybody would share everything with everybody else....and nobody would want to go to war with each other.
My views are based in reality and from history.. I am with Jefferson when he said "the government that governs least governs best" and "government at best is a NECESSARY EVIL, and at worse an INTOLERANT ONE".
Let me let me you in on a little secret- "power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely"..
There is not getting around this. IF we had a big government with the all right people now....what is gonna stop that government from becoming corrupt later? Your system assumes that every generation will produce good leaders. I disagree.
We might as well go back to a monarchy then. I mean, if we had good kings why would we need a democracy in the first place?
the system is based off of checks and balances and decentralized power.
The congress checks the executive, the courts check congress, the states check the federal government and visa versa, and the constitution checks all the above.
And when the government breaks down, WE THE PEOPLE are all that is left to prevent a government tyranny.
@gideondavid30 A small government seems like a good approach theoretically but how practical is the approach. I'm a little confused by what you mean by 'small government'. do you want less people? do you want less stringent legislation? Either of those options are not viable. This small government sentiment has become an ideal that people think will fix all our problems.Simply put, the inability, or unwillingness should I say, to balance the budget is the root cause of problems.
@rza1m On top of that you have our political representatives corrupted by lobbyists who pay out to have their needs met before those of the general public. These same people parade around as job creators ultimately creating this paternalistic approach which is a foundation of capitalism. Throw on the perpetuation of ignorance by media organisations and individuals, who are themselves funded by the very people they so sincerely defend and we have the root of the problem.
The reason lobbyists exist is because their is incentive to buy of politicians. There will always be an incentive...and as long as people are in positions in power greed will always be a temptation.
My solution to this problem is is simple. Shrink the government and you shrink the corporations incentive to buy off politicans.
I hate to burst your bubble here..but we don't live in a capitalist system. We live in a mixed economy..AKA corportism or fascism light. We in a country where the corporations and banks have bought off the government...and they work together to advance their own interests at the expense of WE THE PEOPLE.
True laissez faire capitalism (free markets) is based private companies/individauls competing with each other without government involvement. The only regulatingbody is the courts for determining property rights and the invasion of liberty. Free markets do the regulating as if a company does poorly it goes bankrupt.
THERE WOULD BE NO BAILOUTS IN A FREE MARKET. If a company sells dangerous or bad produdcts.....its reputation would be damaged and people can vote with their dollar.
You are missing the point. A large government is worse than a smaller government. Generally, the more responsiblities you put on your government as opposed to yourself the greater the chances for corruption to set in.
LIke I said before, if you want a larger government then do that at the state levels. If you want to be in a state where you must pay 50-75% in taxes of all kinds be my guest. Let those who choose smaller government live in a state where they can self govern.
Balancing the budget is precisely the reason we need smaller government.
If the government did not have the authority to do this or that we wouldn't be in a FISCAL CRISIS. This isn't a mystery. Governments cost money. Bigger governments cost more than smaller governments.
@gideondavid30 Firstly, regardless of whether the economy is mixed, businessmen and politicians would bend over backwards to convince you otherwise. Even though most advocates of capitalism would claim that the economy is in fact capitalist it's clear that it's a corporate hegemony. Corporations dictate to our politicians because they are primary campaign donators, simple. That aside I don't see what regurgitating simple economics does to justify the efficiency of viability of a small government
Correction: Corrupt businessmen and corrupt politicians would bend over backwards convincing me otherwise. The marriage between government and business is unholy and not compatible in a free market economy.
Again, I will repeat this several times.....corporations will always find ways to buy the politicans. That is why I don't trust larger governments. The capacity of corruption is greater.
@gideondavid30 Corruption is not always mutual with the size of the organisation. If the structure of an organisation is able to be compromised by outside players while actually having a legitimate frame to do so it will inevitably happen. I think what you should be concerned with is government representing people and the majority rather than the corporate minority with more money.
How do your figure? If the president is a tyrant he oppresses 300 million people. On the other hand, if a governnor of Texas becomes a dictator and succeeds from the U.S. he oppresses ........somewhere between 10-30 million?
Of course smaller governments can become corrupted just as easily..the difference is the size and scale.
THE POINT IS AGAIN.....we need a system of checks and balances...that isn't hard to understand.
@gideondavid30 Ok, look. Hypotheticals mean nothing. You can keep throwing our these situations but they're completely irrelevant. We already have a system of checks and balances, we just aren't balancing it very well. People keep wondering why we're in this situation. Is it bad spending? The war?, which is actually perpetuating the situation. No. I'll tell you why. It's because in 2008 investment banks decided to basically bet with mortgage backed securities all because of deregulation.
@rza1m this was all able to happen due to corporate lobbyist from investment firms, who i should mention pay most of the contributions towards presidential candidates and their administration. Well what do they get in return? The consistent deregulation of the financial industry which started back around Raegans time in office.
The end all of this is we need to increase the quality of education kids receive throughout every level of education. It's much harder to trick and intelligent group.
I disagree, we had a system of checks and balances that erroded away over time.
And you are correct about the banks. However, you forgot to mention that the government promised to back these banks as it wanted to help poor people get housing.
Government is not innocent in this......I would argue it is the cause because enabled banks to make risky loans it normally wouldn't have made.
@gideondavid30 You have this idealist somewhat naive view of economics. No economy is purely laissez faire. What they mean is they try not to interfere in market competition. Other than that there is always regulation in industry. It's not because government is intrusive or paternalistic but because economies require regulation.Without it businesses would basically abuse their motive which by law is to maximise profits.
The banks did not want to 'help poor people', it's called predatory lending
You are half right. There is regulation industry through free markets not government intervention....as in the forces of competition keep businesses honest or they go bankrupt.
True, the courts exist to determine when a company violates property rights (ie pollution) and intrudes on liberty (ie force). However, regulating bodies do not have come through the government. Grassroot organizations can form through the private sector to regulate these companies...
The banks did not want to help the poor people but the government did. The government backed these banks who then did the "predatory lending" that you speak of.
@gideondavid30 No they didn't. Do you read anything I write. The one thing that can accomplish things for people in life is money. It can often times be the deciding point in a politicians run for office. If a politician is well funded they have a better chance to run. It's no coincidence that the same people who pay politicians to run for president want favours. And it's no coincidence that many of these are banks. Do the math.
The banks run the country. They have federal protection. That is the problem.
Start with the FED..then work your way through FANNY MAE and FREDDY MAC.
There is an unholy alliance here. You can hate corporations whose number one goal is to make a profit.....I say you hate the marriage between corporations and government......rather than the former or the latter.
@gideondavid30 wouldn't work. Too many complications with conflicting laws wouldn't work. Some legislation at the state level, yes. But flat out state independent is too complicated.
The only way a government TRULY represents its people is if it accountable to the people.
Today, we have a government that ignores the constitution, spends money we don't have, and is owned by foreign bankers and corporations. It gets away with this much easier when people like you justify government growth by some abstract utopian philosophy that has no basis in reality.
I think people like you are so full of knowledge...yet lack courage to change your worldview when it is incorrect.
Fuck the third parties, the game is completely rigged against them. At least Ron Paul is making a bigger impact as a libertarian in the Republican party. Even though that's rigged too it seems like libertarians have more of a fighting chance in infiltrating the GOP than we do running in the LP.
I LOVE it how actors, actually start to believe their own hype. Then they open their mouths and show every how stupid they are. Go study history and basic economics!!! What a moron!! I used to like this guy. I just can't respect stupid people. Teachers work 9 mos. out of the year minus holidays and school breaks which comes out closer to 7 mos. but still make about $40k for the year. not a bad deal w/ benefits. And if they are "shitty" teachers, molesters,ect. Guess what, they can't be fired!!!
@humblaznlv : Can you cite some sources about how many months teachers work and they get paid 40K for that? Also about shitty teachers can't be fired? I am just asking for some sources. Thanks.
@dsarkar81@humblaznlv I'll be your source buddy. Im an ESE teacher in Florida. I have 14 autistic students crammed into a class. These students have severe behavioral and academic deficits. I work sometimes 60 hours a week to complete all lesson plans and activities for my class. Over the summer I take on-line classes and trainings to maintain my teaching credentials. Now they are discussing basing my salary on how well my exceptional kids score on a test. What do you do for a living?
@jeffreybennett7 Well, if you don't think this is a broken system. Who will!!?
government schools are not working. I'm sure there are the exception to the rule. Which are schools in a very affluent area. But those aren't the rule. The parents and good teachers have lost control over their classes. I've seen this even in good school districts. I remember being in school, and my good teachers always stood out, because they were few and far between. I also remember,..
@jeffreybennett7 I also remember my good teachers because they helped to inspire me so much. I also remember my bad teachers who should never be allowed to work around children. So in answer comments my experience, and their friends who are teachers are the best sources I can cite. Like I said their always a story in the news about our local school system. All you have to do is look. But if your going to take it as a personal attack. Well, that would be kind of foolish.
@jeffreybennett7 foolish and overly sensitive. Because I have idea who you are. So take it the way it written. A comment on a bad system that dose not work. So good night
@dsarkar81 My sources are my close friends that are in the school system where I live.
Also my best friends G.F. is a school counselor, and she makes over 60k. So the sources I'm using are the ones around me. As far as days off, all you have to do is look at the school year schedule. So I'm using my local school district. And have you seen the stories in the news lately about the teachers arrested for abusing their young students. They actually got paid!!! Their salary of over 40k.
@humblaznlv: I am sorry to hear that about your school district. Please be mindful though that you have cited only your area or even at best the state of florida. That is hardly a statistic on a national level.
I am a graduate student in a university and I teach elementary algebra to all freshman and deficient students. More often than not, it is an attitude problem with the students. My peers in other universities around the country state the same. That's a pretty strong statistic.
@dsarkar81 I have no doubt about the students. Like i said I 've been in the best schools and the worst schools. I mean the kind they make movies about. In one of my schools i attended, there were shoot outs routinely near,even in front of our school. That was a junior High. But I really doubt you seen this first hand. But again that is a symptom of the real problem. Government schools is a bad system. I'm sure you work hard.
@dsarkar81 I also know for a fact, taken out of a bad system both student and teacher can flourish. I mean I am speaking from experience. Again I have a lot of close friends that are Teachers. Everyone agrees the government system doesn't on a blanket system. Teachers and parents need to be in control. Without some monolithic all controlling central system.
Check out the complete exchange (right). Love the bit at the end where Matt's (and his mum) destroys Michelle's whole argument, and her only response is "oh, well I was a student in a school so I know what I'm talking about"!
Funny that part didn't make the cut for this video...
Well, RT raises some good points; our school system is horribly flawed. But they're really not asking the right questions... And neither are we if we think this video does... The much better question is, should we have public schools to begin with? Free public education is a plank of the communist manifesto.
Fire the bottom 10% of teachers...this is as daft as the UK government's decision that schools will be defined as "good" if the exam results exceed the national average and all schools must be rated "good"!
If we start firing policemen based on the number of parking tickets and the length of the reports they write, a) the number of parking tickets will skyrocket, as will the length of their reports, b) many good policemen will get fired because they do their work properly instead of giving in to bureaucracy, c) all policmen's jobs will become much less attractive, and d) over time our country will have a 100% worse policeforce than ever.
Don't fall for the 'fire the worst 10%' political frame.
What credentials does Michelle Fields hold? To me, it looks like they are just inserting an attractive intelligent woman to discuss issues. However, no depth of experience and/or wisdom is behind these discussions from here. Information is not the same as knowledge. Not saying she's not smart, but I'd rather see a SME than a pretty face when discussing subjects of substance.
Wages in the US have been exploding for decades. Economists don't measure the gains from product improvement. This video shows a simple equation that will win the debate for Friedman. Just ask 2 simple questions. What is quality? What is convenience? One equation can explain it all. youtube.com/watch?v=2c4mvGekYZY
even what they're wearing is bullshit... the one girl is wearing a sweater with her tits hanging out and the other is wearing a pink prom dress... is this the news?
the problem with media in general... mostly applied to women journalists... do you honestly believe the the best looking people in the world are the smartest? I'm supposed to believe it's just a coincidence and these two beautiful women are truly the smartest and most qualified. The media is a scam and it's all bullshit. But you wont get viewers if there's not tits on the screen. Youtube has proved that.
Anger is proof that one can't defend their views. Damon's so convinced he's right that he can't meet a challenge. Typical North East blockhead temper. He has no intellect whatsoever just a loud mouth with a view point. The world takes whatever Hollywood gives them and goes "ooh."
As for teachers they like to hear themselves talk and they don't need more pay for this. Students need to decide whether they want to learn is more like it.
ok....here is a way a smart person would look at it. when congress is split 50/50 or whatever it happens to be at the time....the "R"s dont like the "D"s and vice versa. therefore the chances of someone not liking "congress in general" is pretty high. (OH YEAH....MITCH McConnel (spelling) IS NOT IN CHARGE OF THE SENATE!!!!!!! its a Democrat named HARRY REID. Its interesting how they just stuck the Repubs up there on the phote. Nice job! lol loosers
Why would work at Mc d's or pizza hut gettong payed crap unless you really love to do it. Most people teaching are because it's the most stable job market out of collage except for Dr's and nurses .Pluse Like the people working in fast food they are not capable of doing better.
@shaylinmonk It sounds like you're equating working at McDonalds with being a teacher. 'Can't do better than being a teacher'???? Wow. Maybe your English teacher did a terrible job teaching English, based on the very poor sentence structure, grammar, and spelling in *YOUR* post... or maybe you were smoking pot all through school and that's why you think teaching is easy.
@siobanethier Well fuck face since english is my 3rd languge I think I'm doing pretty good. Most fucking americans can only speak one. How bout you? Almost everycountries public school system kicks your ass.
@shaylinmonk ''I'm doing pretty *well*'' ... (I suppose so)... ''every *country's* public school system kicks your ass''. I speak English and French. I'm Canadian. I believe Canada ranked 4th in the world for Education and USA ranked 13th (that seems to be an overly generous ranking to me!)
@siobanethier You grew up speaking english. I did not. Canada just let the french take over thier country and thats pretty amazing seeing they are the worlds biggest pussy. Canda is really ranked 2nd, but to bad they can't teach guts. I was born in Japan and then moved to finland. Two of the worlds top school system. Most countries only require a 4 year degree.
@shaylinmonk It sounds like you're equating working at McDonalds with being a teacher. 'Can't do better than being a teacher'???? Wow. Maybe your English teacher did a terrible job teaching English, based on the very poor sentence structure, grammar, and spelling in *YOUR* post... or maybe you were smoking pot all through school and that's why you think teaching is easy.
The reason we only get 2 options are the regulations and laws that the 2 big parties have pushed through putting massive barriers to entry in the way of any who would challenge them.
Its nice to see a famous celebrity actually being shown giving a shit about political issues, instead of the usually idiocy that is forced into our homes through the television.
Wow, so that 'reporter' has given up even the attempt to at journalistic credibility and just gone for straight editorial cheerleading disguised as 'reporting'
@CamiloSanchez1979 Alyona show doesn't report any domestic russian news. They're in Washington. Why would they talk about the kremlin? More to the point, why are you watching a news show focused on the U.S if you want news about the kremlin?
@CamiloSanchez1979 do you ever see CNN or MSNBC talk about real corruption in Washington? NOP! People are very slow to criticize their own culture. Everyone is guilty of that.
@CamiloSanchez1979 what does that actually have to do with the content of the video? Russia funded or not, Its a English language television show, thats playing in America. Why would they be talking about the Kremlin? Who in America actually really cares about corruption in the Kremlin? Not what you've said it actually true anyway. Peter Lavelle constantly has guests on his show talking about corruption in Russia. Its just you being an American probably aren't interested in the subject.
@CamiloSanchez1979 Why bother with the Kremlin when there is so much in Washington? Oh yeah, because what happens in the Kremlin has so much affect on our personal lives. Not at all like Washington passing legislation on us. (Oh, this is called sarcasm). LMAO!!!
@DJTmaq And mathematically, it's the voting system that helps enforce two parties, that are hardly distinguishable from one. A simple change to approval voting or score voting in state elections would start unraveling that.
lol, what a idiot bunh of ppl commenting on this video.... capitalist braindead sheep.
plusthinking 2 minutes ago
GBTTK - Get Back To The Kitchen.
DJ3G3T5 2 hours ago
If you don't trust a particular company then buy only products that have a stamp of approval by a private regulating company of your choice. Find companies that have a good reputation to buy from. Vote with your dollar.
The truth is just because you have the government regulating companies doesn't mean they are being regulated properly. 9/11 happened and we had plenty of defense spending at the time. Now, instead of firing our government we give them more of our money to protect us!!?
gideondavid30 4 hours ago
They should send this girl out to classrooms to inspire schoolchildren with the story of how she rose in the journalism profession by being a hot moron - it would teach them all about the fantastic egalitarian world we live in. She's actually a walking indictment of journalism degrees; people like her should be turned away at the university gates.
FrogmortonHotchkiss 14 hours ago
You cannot seperate government from economics. The government taxes the people and takes money away from them. Sometimes, the government well take from Peter and give it to Paul.
By doing this, there are economic laws that into play whether you care to admit it or not. Money that goes to the government (ie jobs, welfare, etc) is taken away from the private sector. As taxes goes up there is a tendency of business to change their behavior...ie outsource, fire people, downsize, or quit.
gideondavid30 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey All,Please check out The Subjective Perspective,youtube or google em',and check out their song Dead Peasant Uprising...it is been revered as another powerful anthem for the Occupy Movement.PeaceandLoveandLight-The Subjective Perspective is a true working class voice, born working poor, and has become one of the most well received duo's singing for the 99%.Treat yourself and enjoy Dead Peasant Uprising by The Subjective Perspective. The Live version and Edited Video r amazing!
ThSubjctvPrspctv 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This reporter has a valid argument. What Matt Damon fails to realize is an "affective teacher" isn't acknowledged by establishing how much he or she wants to teach and loves to do it. What Matt Damon also fails to realize is their is a HUGE shortage of affective teachers in the school system. They don't fire incompetent teachers in school systems. They stay for 20 years getting worse as the years go on and retire with benefits at the tax payers expense. The kids are the real victims.
puppiesNicecream 1 day ago
Comment removed
puppiesNicecream 1 day ago
Everyone is complaining that these people are talking about this only because they are hot, but they aren't that hot. They are talking about an important issue because they are reporters, and they are thin thin and well dressed and have makeup because they are reporters on television.
Their jobs are not to add intellect, their jobs are to communicate something and get people to pay attention. Isn't it working?
mike000000000000able 2 days ago
i have to agree with her, teachers should be kept based on performance, not on how long theyve been there.
mattakudesu 2 days ago
@mattakudesu It's more complicated than that, it'd be ridiculously simple if that's all it as.
My parents are both professors, and they both have tenure, they need that tenure to have job guarantee while they fulfill academic side-obligations, that are part of being professors. They don't get paid all that much for that, if at all. They can't do both, but both are necessary, Tenure is not given easily.
It only applies to senior professors anyways. Read the wikipedia article on academic tenure
PaulusCunctator 2 days ago
balance restored
eat666shit 2 days ago
uuu she doesnt see ron raul going indy, fucking place your bets boys, this bitch just told you how it is!
Matador13th 2 days ago
nah she says seniority... so?
kroqster 3 days ago
CHECK OUT JOHN DEWEY!
pCriistopher 4 days ago
246 likes/246 dislikes. OMG!!! Thumbs up if you saw it too!
pirateblarny 4 days ago
Matt Damon is wrong yall
TheAJOlding 4 days ago
These 2 don't have anything new or original to add, and the only reason they are being watched is because they're hot. Yeah, agreed...
daniboy28 5 days ago
@daniboy28
I agree with Michele Fields on this, but yeah, she's an airhead.
Aphoresis 3 days ago
Will Hunting meets Waiting for Superman... Watch the documentary.
TheKaffeeKlatsch 5 days ago
They both got their jobs because they're both hot. What a shame. Someone with much greater intellect would have produced a much more thought provoking show.
GreggTheEgg 5 days ago
The number one indicator of whether a child will do well in school is whether or not their parents are involved with their schoolwork. Saying that tenure is making it harder for us to get rid of bad teachers is a different statement then saying "good" teachers should be rewarded for success. How do you measure the success of a teacher? What if the parents in a particular school district are not very involved in their child's academics? Should we punish the teachers for that?
monkeyfacevideo 5 days ago
Michelle fields teeth clearly had it with her brain, they are trying to escape
merajoga 5 days ago
HBR - Hot But Retarded
"based on senioririty."
WASB - What A Stupid Bitch
wtfthisisabsurd 5 days ago
Someone loving to teach doesn't allow them to be a shitty teacher. The god damn unions keep awful teachers in their jobs long past when they should have fired.
Fuck matt damon
VegasBilgeRat 6 days ago
Our military should be marching on Washington before they go marching anywhere else.
holio84 6 days ago
i love how matt damon has such strong convictions... even when he doesn't know what he's talking about.
yuri29442 6 days ago
His mom is a teacher...he is supporting her.
Matt Damon is an actor........enough said.
gideondavid30 5 days ago
Everyone supports his/her OWN senator or congressperson. It's only EVERYONE ELSE that deserves to be voted out. This is why the problem continues.
amperro 1 week ago
Michelle Fields---money stuffed in her clothes---and in return she shills for the "Libertarians", who would actually be much worse than the Republicans on everything except foreign policy and the drug war.
mrktjobs 1 week ago
Libertarians are consistent on all the issues.
There is not a dime worth a difference between Republicans and Democrats. Obama and Bush are both big on war, taking our civil liberties away, and spending us into bankrupty.
Libertarians are fiscially sane....conservatives and liberals are not.
gideondavid30 5 days ago
Michelle Fields is one of these low-intellligence "reporters" who is a paid shill for corporate interests. Given her obviously limited understanding of how things work, Fields is probably clueless as to where her money comes from.
Fields gets her money from the "Reason Foundation". This is a shill group, supported by very wealthy and greedy people, and corporations that want this propaganda shoved down people's throats.
She knows ZERO about teachers. Bad ones get fired. Fields lies.
mrktjobs 1 week ago
@mrktjobs You couldn't be farther from the truth. But, no point in arguing with a moron, your head is in the sand.
Carry on being a fuck tard.
VegasBilgeRat 6 days ago
Libertarians do not support corporate weflare. Libertarians want to shrink the size of government...thus limiting corporation's ability to abuse government.
Corporations hate free markets because it forces them to compete. Corporations prefer to hire lobbyists, bribe congressmen, write regulations that favor them, and create artificial monopolies protected by government.
gideondavid30 5 days ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
@gideondavid30:
So what kind of welfare do libertarians support? Or do they just want to let the unfortunate, ill or helpless die? Do they hope for compassion and charity of their fellow men regardless of your sex, race, sexuality etc. (so common, especially in the USA XD). I always hear about what they want but never any solution for the problems that will arise when we have libertarism/anarchy in place. Because lets face it, there is not much of a difference between the two.
MsHyde1 5 days ago
@gideondavid30 well with that logic, why have government in the first place? I don't see how the size of government is the issue, its the elected officials -- the politicians who get into the job for corporate sponsorships.... for money, rather than serving the public. if the end of libertarianism is to abolish government, then i agree... but our society is FAR from that ideal. it's going to take an immense amount of education and entirely new institutions to get there
junskey 1 day ago
The purpose of the government is to
1. PROTECT OUR LIBERTY
2. PROTECT OUR PROPERTY
Pretty much the police, the courts, the military, and maybe throw in the roads in the mix for the hell of it.
IF YOU MUST have more than that, then let the STATES do the governing and not the federal government. WHY?
1) It is constitutional that way
2) people can vote with their feet
3) smaller, more localized government governs better than ONE SIZE FITS ALL
4) 50 experiments are better than one
gideondavid30 1 day ago
Libertarians advocate for constitutional government..ie original intent of the founding fathers.
Education right now, is under the monopoly of the federal government. Considering the fiscal mountatin we are facing, it is only matter of time before the government stronghold is broken.
I agree, society is far from that ideal...but a good smack in the mouth might wake us up.
gideondavid30 1 day ago
@gideondavid30 Can we stop with this 'shrink the government' rhetoric. What part of the government would you shrink exactly? I think people have this habit of just throwing out words with presupposed meaning without considering that they mean.
The government needs to govern correctly. Not shrunk. A big government doing the right things is exactly what we need right now.
rza1m 1 day ago
To be honest with you man,
You can have faith in your government.......when the economy collapses don't be shocked though. You government has failed you and will continually fail you.
gideondavid30 1 day ago
@gideondavid30 See this is the problem. You look at everything with THIS government or THAT government. We have an intrinsically corrupt system which is why the political landscape is the way it is. If we had a HUGE government that wasn't corrupt the world economy would look very different. The problem with your view is your assume that it's unfixable, so how do we fix it? We shrink it down. That's counter intuitive.
rza1m 1 day ago
IF.......always IF......
yes in a perfect world we would angels in office governing mankind. Everybody would share everything with everybody else....and nobody would want to go to war with each other.
My views are based in reality and from history.. I am with Jefferson when he said "the government that governs least governs best" and "government at best is a NECESSARY EVIL, and at worse an INTOLERANT ONE".
gideondavid30 1 day ago
Let me let me you in on a little secret- "power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely"..
There is not getting around this. IF we had a big government with the all right people now....what is gonna stop that government from becoming corrupt later? Your system assumes that every generation will produce good leaders. I disagree.
We might as well go back to a monarchy then. I mean, if we had good kings why would we need a democracy in the first place?
gideondavid30 1 day ago
America is a constitutional Republic -
the system is based off of checks and balances and decentralized power.
The congress checks the executive, the courts check congress, the states check the federal government and visa versa, and the constitution checks all the above.
And when the government breaks down, WE THE PEOPLE are all that is left to prevent a government tyranny.
gideondavid30 1 day ago
@gideondavid30 A small government seems like a good approach theoretically but how practical is the approach. I'm a little confused by what you mean by 'small government'. do you want less people? do you want less stringent legislation? Either of those options are not viable. This small government sentiment has become an ideal that people think will fix all our problems.Simply put, the inability, or unwillingness should I say, to balance the budget is the root cause of problems.
rza1m 1 day ago
@rza1m On top of that you have our political representatives corrupted by lobbyists who pay out to have their needs met before those of the general public. These same people parade around as job creators ultimately creating this paternalistic approach which is a foundation of capitalism. Throw on the perpetuation of ignorance by media organisations and individuals, who are themselves funded by the very people they so sincerely defend and we have the root of the problem.
rza1m 1 day ago
The reason lobbyists exist is because their is incentive to buy of politicians. There will always be an incentive...and as long as people are in positions in power greed will always be a temptation.
My solution to this problem is is simple. Shrink the government and you shrink the corporations incentive to buy off politicans.
gideondavid30 1 day ago
I hate to burst your bubble here..but we don't live in a capitalist system. We live in a mixed economy..AKA corportism or fascism light. We in a country where the corporations and banks have bought off the government...and they work together to advance their own interests at the expense of WE THE PEOPLE.
gideondavid30 1 day ago
True laissez faire capitalism (free markets) is based private companies/individauls competing with each other without government involvement. The only regulatingbody is the courts for determining property rights and the invasion of liberty. Free markets do the regulating as if a company does poorly it goes bankrupt.
THERE WOULD BE NO BAILOUTS IN A FREE MARKET. If a company sells dangerous or bad produdcts.....its reputation would be damaged and people can vote with their dollar.
gideondavid30 1 day ago
You are missing the point. A large government is worse than a smaller government. Generally, the more responsiblities you put on your government as opposed to yourself the greater the chances for corruption to set in.
LIke I said before, if you want a larger government then do that at the state levels. If you want to be in a state where you must pay 50-75% in taxes of all kinds be my guest. Let those who choose smaller government live in a state where they can self govern.
gideondavid30 1 day ago
Balancing the budget is precisely the reason we need smaller government.
If the government did not have the authority to do this or that we wouldn't be in a FISCAL CRISIS. This isn't a mystery. Governments cost money. Bigger governments cost more than smaller governments.
gideondavid30 1 day ago
@gideondavid30 Firstly, regardless of whether the economy is mixed, businessmen and politicians would bend over backwards to convince you otherwise. Even though most advocates of capitalism would claim that the economy is in fact capitalist it's clear that it's a corporate hegemony. Corporations dictate to our politicians because they are primary campaign donators, simple. That aside I don't see what regurgitating simple economics does to justify the efficiency of viability of a small government
rza1m 1 day ago
Correction: Corrupt businessmen and corrupt politicians would bend over backwards convincing me otherwise. The marriage between government and business is unholy and not compatible in a free market economy.
Again, I will repeat this several times.....corporations will always find ways to buy the politicans. That is why I don't trust larger governments. The capacity of corruption is greater.
gideondavid30 1 day ago
@gideondavid30 Corruption is not always mutual with the size of the organisation. If the structure of an organisation is able to be compromised by outside players while actually having a legitimate frame to do so it will inevitably happen. I think what you should be concerned with is government representing people and the majority rather than the corporate minority with more money.
rza1m 1 day ago
LOL,
How do your figure? If the president is a tyrant he oppresses 300 million people. On the other hand, if a governnor of Texas becomes a dictator and succeeds from the U.S. he oppresses ........somewhere between 10-30 million?
Of course smaller governments can become corrupted just as easily..the difference is the size and scale.
THE POINT IS AGAIN.....we need a system of checks and balances...that isn't hard to understand.
gideondavid30 19 hours ago
@gideondavid30 Ok, look. Hypotheticals mean nothing. You can keep throwing our these situations but they're completely irrelevant. We already have a system of checks and balances, we just aren't balancing it very well. People keep wondering why we're in this situation. Is it bad spending? The war?, which is actually perpetuating the situation. No. I'll tell you why. It's because in 2008 investment banks decided to basically bet with mortgage backed securities all because of deregulation.
rza1m 12 hours ago
@rza1m this was all able to happen due to corporate lobbyist from investment firms, who i should mention pay most of the contributions towards presidential candidates and their administration. Well what do they get in return? The consistent deregulation of the financial industry which started back around Raegans time in office.
The end all of this is we need to increase the quality of education kids receive throughout every level of education. It's much harder to trick and intelligent group.
rza1m 12 hours ago
I disagree, we had a system of checks and balances that erroded away over time.
And you are correct about the banks. However, you forgot to mention that the government promised to back these banks as it wanted to help poor people get housing.
Government is not innocent in this......I would argue it is the cause because enabled banks to make risky loans it normally wouldn't have made.
gideondavid30 6 hours ago
@gideondavid30 You have this idealist somewhat naive view of economics. No economy is purely laissez faire. What they mean is they try not to interfere in market competition. Other than that there is always regulation in industry. It's not because government is intrusive or paternalistic but because economies require regulation.Without it businesses would basically abuse their motive which by law is to maximise profits.
The banks did not want to 'help poor people', it's called predatory lending
rza1m 4 hours ago
You are half right. There is regulation industry through free markets not government intervention....as in the forces of competition keep businesses honest or they go bankrupt.
True, the courts exist to determine when a company violates property rights (ie pollution) and intrudes on liberty (ie force). However, regulating bodies do not have come through the government. Grassroot organizations can form through the private sector to regulate these companies...
gideondavid30 4 hours ago
The banks did not want to help the poor people but the government did. The government backed these banks who then did the "predatory lending" that you speak of.
gideondavid30 4 hours ago
@gideondavid30 No they didn't. Do you read anything I write. The one thing that can accomplish things for people in life is money. It can often times be the deciding point in a politicians run for office. If a politician is well funded they have a better chance to run. It's no coincidence that the same people who pay politicians to run for president want favours. And it's no coincidence that many of these are banks. Do the math.
rza1m 4 hours ago
Here is my point man -
The banks run the country. They have federal protection. That is the problem.
Start with the FED..then work your way through FANNY MAE and FREDDY MAC.
There is an unholy alliance here. You can hate corporations whose number one goal is to make a profit.....I say you hate the marriage between corporations and government......rather than the former or the latter.
gideondavid30 4 hours ago
@gideondavid30 Atleast we've come to an agreement that small government is not the problem.
rza1m 4 hours ago
PART of the problem.
Like I said man, you believe in regulations do it al the state level...thats all I'm saying..thats all I been saying.
gideondavid30 43 minutes ago
@gideondavid30 wouldn't work. Too many complications with conflicting laws wouldn't work. Some legislation at the state level, yes. But flat out state independent is too complicated.
rza1m 34 minutes ago
Comment removed
gideondavid30 19 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The only way a government TRULY represents its people is if it accountable to the people.
Today, we have a government that ignores the constitution, spends money we don't have, and is owned by foreign bankers and corporations. It gets away with this much easier when people like you justify government growth by some abstract utopian philosophy that has no basis in reality.
I think people like you are so full of knowledge...yet lack courage to change your worldview when it is incorrect.
gideondavid30 19 hours ago
why is this bitch talking? just open your blouse you stupid bimbo
HPhenomenal 1 week ago
Michelle Fields is a no good cocksucking cunt.
fuckooo 1 week ago
I would suck a fart from her butt!
buttflyzzz 1 week ago
Fuck the third parties, the game is completely rigged against them. At least Ron Paul is making a bigger impact as a libertarian in the Republican party. Even though that's rigged too it seems like libertarians have more of a fighting chance in infiltrating the GOP than we do running in the LP.
dubified89 1 week ago
I LOVE it how actors, actually start to believe their own hype. Then they open their mouths and show every how stupid they are. Go study history and basic economics!!! What a moron!! I used to like this guy. I just can't respect stupid people. Teachers work 9 mos. out of the year minus holidays and school breaks which comes out closer to 7 mos. but still make about $40k for the year. not a bad deal w/ benefits. And if they are "shitty" teachers, molesters,ect. Guess what, they can't be fired!!!
humblaznlv 1 week ago
@humblaznlv : Can you cite some sources about how many months teachers work and they get paid 40K for that? Also about shitty teachers can't be fired? I am just asking for some sources. Thanks.
dsarkar81 1 week ago
@dsarkar81 @humblaznlv I'll be your source buddy. Im an ESE teacher in Florida. I have 14 autistic students crammed into a class. These students have severe behavioral and academic deficits. I work sometimes 60 hours a week to complete all lesson plans and activities for my class. Over the summer I take on-line classes and trainings to maintain my teaching credentials. Now they are discussing basing my salary on how well my exceptional kids score on a test. What do you do for a living?
jeffreybennett7 1 week ago
@jeffreybennett7 Well, if you don't think this is a broken system. Who will!!?
government schools are not working. I'm sure there are the exception to the rule. Which are schools in a very affluent area. But those aren't the rule. The parents and good teachers have lost control over their classes. I've seen this even in good school districts. I remember being in school, and my good teachers always stood out, because they were few and far between. I also remember,..
humblaznlv 1 week ago
@jeffreybennett7 I also remember my good teachers because they helped to inspire me so much. I also remember my bad teachers who should never be allowed to work around children. So in answer comments my experience, and their friends who are teachers are the best sources I can cite. Like I said their always a story in the news about our local school system. All you have to do is look. But if your going to take it as a personal attack. Well, that would be kind of foolish.
humblaznlv 1 week ago
@jeffreybennett7 foolish and overly sensitive. Because I have idea who you are. So take it the way it written. A comment on a bad system that dose not work. So good night
humblaznlv 1 week ago
@dsarkar81 My sources are my close friends that are in the school system where I live.
Also my best friends G.F. is a school counselor, and she makes over 60k. So the sources I'm using are the ones around me. As far as days off, all you have to do is look at the school year schedule. So I'm using my local school district. And have you seen the stories in the news lately about the teachers arrested for abusing their young students. They actually got paid!!! Their salary of over 40k.
humblaznlv 1 week ago
@humblaznlv: I am sorry to hear that about your school district. Please be mindful though that you have cited only your area or even at best the state of florida. That is hardly a statistic on a national level.
I am a graduate student in a university and I teach elementary algebra to all freshman and deficient students. More often than not, it is an attitude problem with the students. My peers in other universities around the country state the same. That's a pretty strong statistic.
dsarkar81 1 week ago
@dsarkar81 I have no doubt about the students. Like i said I 've been in the best schools and the worst schools. I mean the kind they make movies about. In one of my schools i attended, there were shoot outs routinely near,even in front of our school. That was a junior High. But I really doubt you seen this first hand. But again that is a symptom of the real problem. Government schools is a bad system. I'm sure you work hard.
humblaznlv 1 week ago
@dsarkar81 I also know for a fact, taken out of a bad system both student and teacher can flourish. I mean I am speaking from experience. Again I have a lot of close friends that are Teachers. Everyone agrees the government system doesn't on a blanket system. Teachers and parents need to be in control. Without some monolithic all controlling central system.
humblaznlv 1 week ago
@humblaznlv my goodness you are misinformed aren't ya? Did you get your info from Rush?
jeffreybennett7 1 week ago
Check out the complete exchange (right). Love the bit at the end where Matt's (and his mum) destroys Michelle's whole argument, and her only response is "oh, well I was a student in a school so I know what I'm talking about"!
Funny that part didn't make the cut for this video...
sdoj76 1 week ago
in ontario canada, teachers are waiting in line to get on the sub list . teacher's should be paid a lot less in ontario....supply /demand.
samlanemusic 1 week ago
Well, RT raises some good points; our school system is horribly flawed. But they're really not asking the right questions... And neither are we if we think this video does... The much better question is, should we have public schools to begin with? Free public education is a plank of the communist manifesto.
confoundtheidols 1 week ago
@confoundtheidols Jump off a Bridge... If you dont want free education, move to Haiti!
JUDALATION 1 week ago
@confoundtheidols home schooled were ya?
jeffreybennett7 1 week ago
Fire the bottom 10% of teachers...this is as daft as the UK government's decision that schools will be defined as "good" if the exam results exceed the national average and all schools must be rated "good"!
weejockpoopongmcplop 1 week ago
If we start firing policemen based on the number of parking tickets and the length of the reports they write, a) the number of parking tickets will skyrocket, as will the length of their reports, b) many good policemen will get fired because they do their work properly instead of giving in to bureaucracy, c) all policmen's jobs will become much less attractive, and d) over time our country will have a 100% worse policeforce than ever.
Don't fall for the 'fire the worst 10%' political frame.
hminkema 1 week ago
What credentials does Michelle Fields hold? To me, it looks like they are just inserting an attractive intelligent woman to discuss issues. However, no depth of experience and/or wisdom is behind these discussions from here. Information is not the same as knowledge. Not saying she's not smart, but I'd rather see a SME than a pretty face when discussing subjects of substance.
hicksdj6066 1 week ago
227 likes, 227 dislikes
cool
lowexpectationsrgood 1 week ago
They know almost as much about current events as their tits do.
f123raptor 1 week ago
I FUCKED MATT DAMON!
bwbk007 1 week ago
Just watched it for the babes
davethegunslally 2 weeks ago
I watched this whole thing.
Not only did I get nothing, I can't imaging who would.
I already know Matt is a jerk.
tnekkc 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wages in the US have been exploding for decades. Economists don't measure the gains from product improvement. This video shows a simple equation that will win the debate for Friedman. Just ask 2 simple questions. What is quality? What is convenience? One equation can explain it all. youtube.com/watch?v=2c4mvGekYZY
IlirMr 2 weeks ago
Alyona go home to Russia. You owe America a lot and should be ashamed of destroying it with russian propaganda.
Toucanfan 2 weeks ago
even what they're wearing is bullshit... the one girl is wearing a sweater with her tits hanging out and the other is wearing a pink prom dress... is this the news?
urwholefamilydied 2 weeks ago
the problem with media in general... mostly applied to women journalists... do you honestly believe the the best looking people in the world are the smartest? I'm supposed to believe it's just a coincidence and these two beautiful women are truly the smartest and most qualified. The media is a scam and it's all bullshit. But you wont get viewers if there's not tits on the screen. Youtube has proved that.
urwholefamilydied 2 weeks ago 3
Anger is proof that one can't defend their views. Damon's so convinced he's right that he can't meet a challenge. Typical North East blockhead temper. He has no intellect whatsoever just a loud mouth with a view point. The world takes whatever Hollywood gives them and goes "ooh."
As for teachers they like to hear themselves talk and they don't need more pay for this. Students need to decide whether they want to learn is more like it.
tyrantofglory 2 weeks ago
This is amazing reporting. NOT! How about bringing Matt Damon back on so he can actually defend his position?
MrSuperCollider 2 weeks ago
I would absolutely destroy that chick
vladimirhorowitz 2 weeks ago
LOL! way to use matt damon's annihilation of michelle fields and pretend he's on their side
spicyxlilxman 2 weeks ago
The girl in the pink dress looks like the girl from Ferris Buellers day off. Is it her?
zodiam1 2 weeks ago
"I think it's because we don't have any quality candidates."
Yes of course, that's exactly what the problem is.
Go home.....
ouruhuru 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RT is so good at scrutinizing the US <--- well said! Fuck the rest you said, someone else can scrutiny Kremlin. Anyone?
LuxiusDK 2 weeks ago
Michelle Fields is hot as balls. Not much going on upstairs, unfortunately.
tommylehman 2 weeks ago
Michelle Fields is so hot. Damn.
TheAngeltoDemon 2 weeks ago
ok....here is a way a smart person would look at it. when congress is split 50/50 or whatever it happens to be at the time....the "R"s dont like the "D"s and vice versa. therefore the chances of someone not liking "congress in general" is pretty high. (OH YEAH....MITCH McConnel (spelling) IS NOT IN CHARGE OF THE SENATE!!!!!!! its a Democrat named HARRY REID. Its interesting how they just stuck the Repubs up there on the phote. Nice job! lol loosers
lanebatts26 2 weeks ago
who's gonna fap to michelle fields tonight?
cdmillig 2 weeks ago 21
@cdmillig haha
Outoftheclique 2 weeks ago
@cdmillig fap fap fap..... i'm faping right now
Hopsinwreck 1 week ago
@cdmillig Why wait?
ltflermy 1 week ago
@cdmillig Have some respect. Please!
themostdismal 4 days ago
@cdmillig +1 she's so sexy
lcblahollywoodgrunt 2 days ago
i wonder why i watched the video and never understood a word.. my imagination was thinking of other things while watching.
ikawpipa 2 weeks ago
this girl is a fucking idiot
MrMrsquid 3 weeks ago
Those who can, do, those who can't, indoctrinate for the state!
4n0nym0us0ne 3 weeks ago
MYATT DAEMON!!
Spic173 3 weeks ago
Maybe I'm a genius but I can see when someone talks bullshit! And she talked a lot of bullshit!!
Densegrandeduvan 3 weeks ago 8
@Densegrandeduvan Just as you are doing here correct. Fucking dumbocant~ Go fap to you're master Odumber and you're communist flag!
DAMMITPANDA 1 week ago
If you apply your 'method' to all jobs in America (your included) you would be unemployed. You are a moron 'Barbie'. Go back to doing jell-o shots.
namdlotaf 3 weeks ago 2
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Stupid fucking Americans.. aargh.. Let the teachers alone.. a discourse is something negative u morron... aaaargh
Buggaloocrazy 3 weeks ago
Sorry is this girl an expert. Or are Americans just barmy? She seems totally out of it to me, sorry.
madelena1234 3 weeks ago
Why would work at Mc d's or pizza hut gettong payed crap unless you really love to do it. Most people teaching are because it's the most stable job market out of collage except for Dr's and nurses .Pluse Like the people working in fast food they are not capable of doing better.
shaylinmonk 3 weeks ago
@shaylinmonk It sounds like you're equating working at McDonalds with being a teacher. 'Can't do better than being a teacher'???? Wow. Maybe your English teacher did a terrible job teaching English, based on the very poor sentence structure, grammar, and spelling in *YOUR* post... or maybe you were smoking pot all through school and that's why you think teaching is easy.
siobanethier 2 weeks ago
@siobanethier Well fuck face since english is my 3rd languge I think I'm doing pretty good. Most fucking americans can only speak one. How bout you? Almost everycountries public school system kicks your ass.
shaylinmonk 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
siobanethier 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@shaylinmonk ''I'm doing pretty *well*'' ... (I suppose so)... ''every *country's* public school system kicks your ass''. I speak English and French. I'm Canadian. I believe Canada ranked 4th in the world for Education and USA ranked 13th (that seems to be an overly generous ranking to me!)
siobanethier 2 weeks ago
@siobanethier Smoking pot worked for me, thanks. I think teaching is easy if you don't give a damn. Teaching is hard if you care. Peace
EattherichBuddy 2 weeks ago
@siobanethier You grew up speaking english. I did not. Canada just let the french take over thier country and thats pretty amazing seeing they are the worlds biggest pussy. Canda is really ranked 2nd, but to bad they can't teach guts. I was born in Japan and then moved to finland. Two of the worlds top school system. Most countries only require a 4 year degree.
shaylinmonk 2 weeks ago
@shaylinmonk The French did not take over *their* country... *too* bad they can't teach..
siobanethier 2 weeks ago
@siobanethier no they took over canada. to bad you canadian
shaylinmonk 2 weeks ago
@shaylinmonk ...*too* bad, you Canadian.
siobanethier 2 weeks ago
@siobanethier Gaynadian. Is that better.
shaylinmonk 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@shaylinmonk It sounds like you're equating working at McDonalds with being a teacher. 'Can't do better than being a teacher'???? Wow. Maybe your English teacher did a terrible job teaching English, based on the very poor sentence structure, grammar, and spelling in *YOUR* post... or maybe you were smoking pot all through school and that's why you think teaching is easy.
siobanethier 2 weeks ago
shut the fuck up bitch!
CivilKnowsEvenBetter 3 weeks ago
Two bimbo's who are bad at their job, commenting on people being bad at their job. Love it.
deziistheone 3 weeks ago
Thats what's wrong with the news. If she was a man and got hired on ability she would have avoided the Damon smack down
40joel 3 weeks ago
The reason we only get 2 options are the regulations and laws that the 2 big parties have pushed through putting massive barriers to entry in the way of any who would challenge them.
Berelore 3 weeks ago
Its nice to see a famous celebrity actually being shown giving a shit about political issues, instead of the usually idiocy that is forced into our homes through the television.
Yakiller69 3 weeks ago
Wow, so that 'reporter' has given up even the attempt to at journalistic credibility and just gone for straight editorial cheerleading disguised as 'reporting'
Fox News would be proud.
Hopeful71 3 weeks ago
Hey Michelle...can you please spell "Senior-ority"
JewFishTV 3 weeks ago
did the chick in grey say "seniorority"?
burisa74137 3 weeks ago
I'd like to jump right in the middle of that discussion. Perhaps at a different venue. Not so much for the riveting discussion.
sajateacher 3 weeks ago
Look @ that mouth....
DrLeroyGreen 3 weeks ago
Michelle Fields is cute as shit!
LeonDawson11 3 weeks ago
Russia Today lets talk about rigged election in russia
2228676 3 weeks ago
RT is so good at scrutinizing the US but god forbid they try to talk about corruption in the Kremlin .
CamiloSanchez1979 4 weeks ago 28
@CamiloSanchez1979 I wouldn't watch a russian national tv station if i wanted to find out about such corruption anyway
FredRBP 3 weeks ago
@CamiloSanchez1979
This is RT America god forbid you know what you're talking about before making a comment.
Berelore 3 weeks ago
@CamiloSanchez1979 Alyona show doesn't report any domestic russian news. They're in Washington. Why would they talk about the kremlin? More to the point, why are you watching a news show focused on the U.S if you want news about the kremlin?
BOZ11 3 weeks ago
@CamiloSanchez1979 And who is good at scrutinizing the US corruption ?
hamrite 3 weeks ago
@hamrite See Blagojadevich vs The United States.
CamiloSanchez1979 3 weeks ago
@CamiloSanchez1979 do you ever see CNN or MSNBC talk about real corruption in Washington? NOP! People are very slow to criticize their own culture. Everyone is guilty of that.
ringforrohan 2 weeks ago
@CamiloSanchez1979 I think this is the American version LOL
dglass81 1 week ago
@CamiloSanchez1979 what does that actually have to do with the content of the video? Russia funded or not, Its a English language television show, thats playing in America. Why would they be talking about the Kremlin? Who in America actually really cares about corruption in the Kremlin? Not what you've said it actually true anyway. Peter Lavelle constantly has guests on his show talking about corruption in Russia. Its just you being an American probably aren't interested in the subject.
vorjay 1 week ago
@CamiloSanchez1979 Why bother with the Kremlin when there is so much in Washington? Oh yeah, because what happens in the Kremlin has so much affect on our personal lives. Not at all like Washington passing legislation on us. (Oh, this is called sarcasm). LMAO!!!
humblaznlv 1 week ago
way to take shit out of context RT you remain to be a shitty biased news station
konatychuk 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
there was so much tension between damon and fields they should've just had sex
konatychuk 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
there was so much tension between damon and fields they should've just had sex
konatychuk 4 weeks ago
there was so much tension between damon and fields they should've just had sex
konatychuk 4 weeks ago
Dear Michelle, it's not a two party system. It's a single party globalist, new world order, system. They have duped you into seeing two parties.
DJTmaq 4 weeks ago
@DJTmaq And mathematically, it's the voting system that helps enforce two parties, that are hardly distinguishable from one. A simple change to approval voting or score voting in state elections would start unraveling that.
dreamcore 4 weeks ago
Fields got completely owned...and she just laughs it off
365to173repubsPWNED 4 weeks ago