Hey can somebody help me out I love this game but I heard they tried to go to a console version but it didn't go through with it but I've seen it for sale online when I search " world in conflict xbox 360" and I was wondering if that is ligit, or will I just got ripped off and if so where can buy a game where ripped off? Thank you
I don't know why, but I found Endwar really dissapointing to play. I mean the content is great, but the gameplay, not so much. I guess I'm use to the calibre of World in Conflict, and because Endwar has a siccors paper rock style.
@2013branth End War really was pretty horrible in the actual gameplay aspect of it. If you were really desperate for a strategy fix on a console, it might be ok but as a PC game it is just sub-par all the way.
Endwar was developed later than WiC yet its graphics were nowhere near as good. You'd think that Ubisoft would publish a game of the same or greater calibre than WiC.
i have to say the game is extremely boring since you are only to command a few units and you rely ony our supportpowers a lot. But most annoying is that you need to use your keyboard for changing camera position while there are so many command keys
@bask185 i didnt see any tactics in this game really just ,no point in it wath is the point of out flancking the enemy tanks with your IFV if there isnt going to make a diference and the m1 armor can be pirced by 20mm guns ouh and the at misiles are a joke it was a complete waste of time.
@mishok007 Nah. World in Conflict is the prequell to Hello Kitty - Island Advneture Funland.
lol Of course its a strategy/tactics game, did it look like, for even a second, in the vid that it would be a FP Shooter? Mate I hope you are either joking or trolling or whatever. Because if not, I'm really worried for you if went and watched the entire review, and not known the answer to that question.
@Se7enBeatleofDoom I think they are. The Chinese entered the war and got beaten back before they even arrived. They're not out of it yet, and everyone is still duking it out over Germany. Just not sure which continent they are going to be holding the America v China conflict. Should be interesting.
@PlaystationNation2k9 I think they may make a sequel. But i am not sure it will continued the same Alternate history Canon as the first game. I have feeling if they make a World in Conflict sequel it may end up being a Homefront style speculative fiction set in a near future conflict then the same Alternate history setting. Other words a stand alone new storyline.
This game is really good, best RTS I've ever played, I prefer the multiplayer but the campaign is good too. If you've played the demo on steam (like I did), it only gets better. Tons of maps and vehicles. Be warned: if you get on a team that dosent talk, your screwed because this game requires more teamwork than modern sports do.
i have only played the demo but i love it, ther is only 1 thing i don't like and that's the cutscenes and trailers i have seen on youtube. They are good looking and fun to watch but i think they are pretty much bullshit becouse they show that Russia (USSR) is a supercountry that is unstoppable and that the us is getting owend losing everything and Russia loses nothing still they are fun to watch and i think that the full game must be awesome
@VIKINGproductions101 LOL actually neither side is losing cause if you have played the whole game including soviet assualt expansion the story tells you that europe or germany to be specific is now a meat grinder and that the russian commanders tell you that they are not losing the war but not winning either and that i might be spoiling it for you but america was getting own because of the russian suprise but i reccomend you buying the game to see how it turns out at the end pretty good!
I will always remember this game in almost 40 years of gaming as the game I had the biggest hopes for, but turned out to be a major disappointment. I've reinstalled it like 5 times and each time I removed it again after a short time.
I got this game a while back and I loved it. I enjoyed the campaign and fighting bots on the multiplayer maps. The No Hope Mod also added a lot of re playability and made me lust to get those extremely powerful nukes.
I just didn't like the personality of people online. They take the game too seriously and treat it like they are in a war (not kidding). The over react to losing and never thank you if you do something that saves their ass. Spawn camping with attack choppers is a problem too.
@MilesQ1 it doesn't fix all the problems, but it definitely makes the game more enjoyable since you can spawn more units and the lust of getting a nuke that destroys the entire map.
@MilesQ1 Good for you, however, other people do. This game wasn't made for you it was made for everyone. And the majority of the people these days want big explosions in games.
@MilesQ1 Really then, you think I'm making this up. Then I wonder why all these extremely popular games have some kind of massive explosion in them? COD4 MW2 Halo Halo 2 Halo 3 Bad Company 2 World in Conflict Starcraft 2 Ace combat zero Ace combat 6 Crysis Crysis 2 The list can go on but there is a character limit. If nobody wants a giant explosion, why are they in these VERY popular games? Do you want me to keep proving you wrong or do you want to stop here before you embarrass yourself?
@Fredfredbug4 Little boy, you were talking about huge explosions in the CONTEXT of your comment about the NUKES. Most of these games don't allow the player to use nukes. It's not my fault that you turn a discussion about nukes into a discussion about large explosions, stick to the topic kiddo.
@MilesQ1 about 90% of the things I said are actual nukes or use use nuclear energy. If you actually put some thought into what you said you would realize it.
Are you trying to start a flamewar? I'm trying to play nice but your comments are starting to turn into personal insults and pointless claims rather then actual facts.
@Fredfredbug4 The personal attacks started, because you start to mold your words into something different, just to win a discussion and that annoys me, like it would anyone else.
You were talking about how the nukes make the skirmish a lot better. It does not, it's foolish to think that just a nuke and more spawns totally turn a lousy skirmish upside down and turn it into a super skirmish. Only people who are not the brightest light in the chandelier would believe such nonsense!
This is what you said "fighting bots on the multiplayer maps"
So you clearly talk about bots. You know would make the skirmishes better? It's ONLY one thing: AI.
Seriously...how on earth can you even think that a bot skirmish gets better because YOU get a nuke and YOU get more spawned units, it's just too foolish for words. AI is what makes it more interesting, what you're talking about has ZERO to do with strategy, it's all about giving your more tools to overpower the bots.
@MilesQ1 I don't get the nukes all the time, usually the bots do and that requires me to react accordingly making it strategy. Have you even played the no hope mod? It doesn't sound like you know anything about it.
@MilesQ1 I never said that the nuke makes the match better, all I was saying was that people prefer them in video games recently. Funny, you claim that I am trying to turn the conversation in another direction while you try to change the topic ever so slightly.
You just can't beat the age old formula of building a base, setting defenses up, and then sending out strike forces to secure resources until your good to attack. This?.....well i liked the game at first but then i played multiplayer. ZERO tolerance for new players, im told to send my tanks into the front, then keep them in the back and kicked THE moment i fail to comply. Oh and whats with the EXTREMELY low flying jets unable to be engaged by aa? that would actually balance crap out.
This game is so fucking good. What amazed me is that this game's framerate is hella better than company of heroes, which looks half as good. Not only is it pretty but the damn mechanics are beautiful.
can you run it is not THAT accurate... it told me i cant run this game but i downloaded the demo and it worked just fine and it was the same case with few other games... its still an okay website to get an idea of what kinda games your pc can run... as for this game i really liked the demo!! so try it out
Would i need a high rate computor to run this? I've a laptop which is probably a medium when it comes to this. I think i might buy this game tomorrow but im hopeing you dont need a REALLY good comp just a decent one. I checked my specs apparently only my video card is below min specs but barely.
Guys I have some questions!! Is this game worth buying?? On a scale of 1 throw 5, 1 being dont buy and 5 being buy it, what would you all rate it as? Plus is it anythinkg like sudden confilct serise? Thanks
id give it 2.5,instead of having those epic battles between 2 superpowers(something like supreme commander)ure controlling like 2 squads of infantry and 2 tanks.
basically the only thing endwar did do that wic didint do was voice command(which actually is near flawless but its the only thing that claims this games fame,but that still doesent make it a better game) also the feature of not being able to free roam with the camera (which really does suck when you experience that).wic just did everything soo much better,especially the explosions! that game was a masterpiece.
not at all in my opinion. endwar is a terrible game. its nothing like this,its camera angles are fucked the actual animations of the general existence of the soldiers and vehicles is pretty croddy too(animation wise that is but the actual graphical imagery is pretty good to an extent) and the effects...the effects are all spritey and generation N64 looking, that only look half decent from a substantial distance(machine gun effects, admittedly look decent for an rts).
apart from the utterly stupid unit names, like the chronomilfsphere or something. And without the tedious and boring base building and with the excellent tactical aid. WIC total pwns CNC
too bad the quality looks like vaginal discharge
GreenDay3213 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey can somebody help me out I love this game but I heard they tried to go to a console version but it didn't go through with it but I've seen it for sale online when I search " world in conflict xbox 360" and I was wondering if that is ligit, or will I just got ripped off and if so where can buy a game where ripped off? Thank you
thatguyflimz 2 weeks ago
Go Sweden
Games2Music 2 months ago
I don't know why, but I found Endwar really dissapointing to play. I mean the content is great, but the gameplay, not so much. I guess I'm use to the calibre of World in Conflict, and because Endwar has a siccors paper rock style.
2013branth 4 months ago
@2013branth End War really was pretty horrible in the actual gameplay aspect of it. If you were really desperate for a strategy fix on a console, it might be ok but as a PC game it is just sub-par all the way.
DeadlyFredXXX 3 months ago
@DeadlyFredXXX
Yeah, totally agree with you.
Endwar was developed later than WiC yet its graphics were nowhere near as good. You'd think that Ubisoft would publish a game of the same or greater calibre than WiC.
2013branth 3 months ago
Fuck i love this game!!! XD
apsten1 5 months ago
Comment removed
devilspirits5 6 months ago
i have to say the game is extremely boring since you are only to command a few units and you rely ony our supportpowers a lot. But most annoying is that you need to use your keyboard for changing camera position while there are so many command keys
bask185 6 months ago
@bask185 try the modern warfare mod, its fun as hell, and they redid anti air... it actually works!
LightfeatherxX 6 months ago
@bask185 i didnt see any tactics in this game really just ,no point in it wath is the point of out flancking the enemy tanks with your IFV if there isnt going to make a diference and the m1 armor can be pirced by 20mm guns ouh and the at misiles are a joke it was a complete waste of time.
IWANAROCKYEEEAAAA 2 months ago
240P!
Coginater 7 months ago
Ahahhaa he said newbie friendly.
*some new guy uses two heavy arty online*
on chat or VOIP
*vote to kick*
*on chat*
"dual arty noob kick him kick him"
zoidberg96913 7 months ago 5
I hate dual arty noobs....They dont help the team at all.
zoidberg96913 8 months ago
@zoidberg96913 umad >:D
osufitchi 7 months ago
@osufitchi ahhaha no XD
zoidberg96913 7 months ago
A bit too american for me. Only USA campaign? Come on!
CU2UK 8 months ago
@CU2UK Soviet Assault
Area51T 7 months ago
Before this game came out there was Ground Control 2!
joesingle 9 months ago
So this is strategy not FPS right?
mishok007 10 months ago
@mishok007 of course... you should get it, its an amazing game
SymphonyStainedRed 9 months ago
@mishok007 Nah. World in Conflict is the prequell to Hello Kitty - Island Advneture Funland.
lol Of course its a strategy/tactics game, did it look like, for even a second, in the vid that it would be a FP Shooter? Mate I hope you are either joking or trolling or whatever. Because if not, I'm really worried for you if went and watched the entire review, and not known the answer to that question.
PlaystationNation2k9 8 months ago
They should make a world in Conflict sequel base around a American-Chinese Conflict!
Se7enBeatleofDoom 10 months ago 18
@Se7enBeatleofDoom I think they are. The Chinese entered the war and got beaten back before they even arrived. They're not out of it yet, and everyone is still duking it out over Germany. Just not sure which continent they are going to be holding the America v China conflict. Should be interesting.
PlaystationNation2k9 8 months ago
@PlaystationNation2k9 I think they may make a sequel. But i am not sure it will continued the same Alternate history Canon as the first game. I have feeling if they make a World in Conflict sequel it may end up being a Homefront style speculative fiction set in a near future conflict then the same Alternate history setting. Other words a stand alone new storyline.
Se7enBeatleofDoom 8 months ago
@Se7enBeatleofDoom
It was america japanese
tHeWoLfOfEpIc 1 month ago
@tHeWoLfOfEpIc LOL WHAT? It was CHINA, not Japan dude,
jotathenoble 4 weeks ago
@Se7enBeatleofDoom yeah and they should call it fallout
charmmuffin 1 month ago
@charmmuffin Or better yet Fallout origins.
Se7enBeatleofDoom 1 month ago
@Se7enBeatleofDoom I just want to see how the war ends
JDOG145899100 1 week ago
This game is really good, best RTS I've ever played, I prefer the multiplayer but the campaign is good too. If you've played the demo on steam (like I did), it only gets better. Tons of maps and vehicles. Be warned: if you get on a team that dosent talk, your screwed because this game requires more teamwork than modern sports do.
MistahTM 10 months ago
Seriously i this game gives me chills.
It gives that realistic feeling.
I mean, when playing the story mode, im like, "Shit i hope this kind of tragedy never happens."
JinKazama92 11 months ago
When ever you loose a unit the voice sounds like Denzel Washington.
zoidberg96913 11 months ago
is there a strategy game for xbox 360 that has huge armys like you could control hecka armies
thekobe157 11 months ago
@thekobe157 Surpreme commander 2.
9cloudersprofile 11 months ago
is there a skirmish mode?
joker9494949494 1 year ago
@joker9494949494 Probably ;)..most likely; I think yes :D
wafflepiepancake 1 year ago
i have only played the demo but i love it, ther is only 1 thing i don't like and that's the cutscenes and trailers i have seen on youtube. They are good looking and fun to watch but i think they are pretty much bullshit becouse they show that Russia (USSR) is a supercountry that is unstoppable and that the us is getting owend losing everything and Russia loses nothing still they are fun to watch and i think that the full game must be awesome
VIKINGproductions101 1 year ago
@VIKINGproductions101 LOL actually neither side is losing cause if you have played the whole game including soviet assualt expansion the story tells you that europe or germany to be specific is now a meat grinder and that the russian commanders tell you that they are not losing the war but not winning either and that i might be spoiling it for you but america was getting own because of the russian suprise but i reccomend you buying the game to see how it turns out at the end pretty good!
00raiser169 1 year ago
are they bringing out a new one??
ImpreialGuard223 1 year ago
how i can play skirmish ? i dont see that option in game menu
tuttifruttimix 1 year ago
@tuttifruttimix its under mulitplayer, not on the main menu
12combo 1 year ago
So is it like AOE3?
AStrongerFellow 1 year ago
This is one of those rare gems out there. Its a damn tragedy that massive went down.
survivor686 1 year ago
@survivor686 does that mean there are no servers running? (i'm thinkin of gettin the game, this or company of heros)
OMEGAxPHOENIX 1 year ago
@OMEGAxPHOENIX dude tons of people play this there are alot of servers open
icarl607 1 year ago
I will always remember this game in almost 40 years of gaming as the game I had the biggest hopes for, but turned out to be a major disappointment. I've reinstalled it like 5 times and each time I removed it again after a short time.
MilesQ1 1 year ago
I got this game a while back and I loved it. I enjoyed the campaign and fighting bots on the multiplayer maps. The No Hope Mod also added a lot of re playability and made me lust to get those extremely powerful nukes.
I just didn't like the personality of people online. They take the game too seriously and treat it like they are in a war (not kidding). The over react to losing and never thank you if you do something that saves their ass. Spawn camping with attack choppers is a problem too.
Fredfredbug4 1 year ago
@Fredfredbug4 "I enjoyed the campaign and fighting bots on the multiplayer maps. "
Really?.... the skirmishes with the bots are boring like hell....sigh
MilesQ1 1 year ago
@MilesQ1 Not if you have the no hope mod and set the bots so that they all are nuke happy ;)
Fredfredbug4 1 year ago
@Fredfredbug4 You're funny top think that the no hope mod fixes all the problems with the skirmish games lol
MilesQ1 1 year ago
@MilesQ1 it doesn't fix all the problems, but it definitely makes the game more enjoyable since you can spawn more units and the lust of getting a nuke that destroys the entire map.
Fredfredbug4 1 year ago
@Fredfredbug4 "and the lust of getting a nuke that destroys the entire map"
I don't like nukes in strategy games.
MilesQ1 1 year ago
@MilesQ1 Good for you, however, other people do. This game wasn't made for you it was made for everyone. And the majority of the people these days want big explosions in games.
Fredfredbug4 1 year ago
@Fredfredbug4 "And the majority of the people these days want big explosions in games"
That's just bullshit that you made up yourself.
MilesQ1 1 year ago
Fredfredbug4 1 year ago
@Fredfredbug4 Little boy, you were talking about huge explosions in the CONTEXT of your comment about the NUKES. Most of these games don't allow the player to use nukes. It's not my fault that you turn a discussion about nukes into a discussion about large explosions, stick to the topic kiddo.
MilesQ1 1 year ago
@MilesQ1 about 90% of the things I said are actual nukes or use use nuclear energy. If you actually put some thought into what you said you would realize it.
Are you trying to start a flamewar? I'm trying to play nice but your comments are starting to turn into personal insults and pointless claims rather then actual facts.
Fredfredbug4 1 year ago
@Fredfredbug4 The personal attacks started, because you start to mold your words into something different, just to win a discussion and that annoys me, like it would anyone else.
You were talking about how the nukes make the skirmish a lot better. It does not, it's foolish to think that just a nuke and more spawns totally turn a lousy skirmish upside down and turn it into a super skirmish. Only people who are not the brightest light in the chandelier would believe such nonsense!
MilesQ1 1 year ago
This is what you said "fighting bots on the multiplayer maps"
So you clearly talk about bots. You know would make the skirmishes better? It's ONLY one thing: AI.
Seriously...how on earth can you even think that a bot skirmish gets better because YOU get a nuke and YOU get more spawned units, it's just too foolish for words. AI is what makes it more interesting, what you're talking about has ZERO to do with strategy, it's all about giving your more tools to overpower the bots.
MilesQ1 1 year ago
You confuse a blow up fest with a strategy game kiddo...
MilesQ1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MilesQ1
how i can play skirmish ? i dont see that option in game menu
tuttifruttimix 1 year ago
@MilesQ1 I don't get the nukes all the time, usually the bots do and that requires me to react accordingly making it strategy. Have you even played the no hope mod? It doesn't sound like you know anything about it.
Fredfredbug4 1 year ago
@MilesQ1 I never said that the nuke makes the match better, all I was saying was that people prefer them in video games recently. Funny, you claim that I am trying to turn the conversation in another direction while you try to change the topic ever so slightly.
Fredfredbug4 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Fredfredbug4
how i can play skirmish ? i dont see that option in game menu
tuttifruttimix 1 year ago
You just can't beat the age old formula of building a base, setting defenses up, and then sending out strike forces to secure resources until your good to attack. This?.....well i liked the game at first but then i played multiplayer. ZERO tolerance for new players, im told to send my tanks into the front, then keep them in the back and kicked THE moment i fail to comply. Oh and whats with the EXTREMELY low flying jets unable to be engaged by aa? that would actually balance crap out.
poonjoo 1 year ago
Probably my favorite video game... ever. <3 World in Conflict, popping my cherry in the RTT genre.
dilbadil 1 year ago
This game is so fucking good. What amazed me is that this game's framerate is hella better than company of heroes, which looks half as good. Not only is it pretty but the damn mechanics are beautiful.
yararu 1 year ago
Such a good game,very realistic and employing real-life tactics,strategies and thinking will see you through.
fixdeluxe1 1 year ago
ign really likes new awkward gameplay. I dont.
KillTheGrasshopper 1 year ago
How come when I looked up "terrible video games," this came up? It doesn't look bad.
Squiremjr 1 year ago
@Thekimler yea i agree the cold wars over (i think) lets pick on someone else now
GtUrPoodleOffMyPorch 1 year ago
@GtUrPoodleOffMyPorch It ended in '91. Now were going against China and North Korea :)
Freemon34 1 year ago
This game is definetly good, this review is spot on, good job :)
cameronp44 1 year ago
This was the best stradgey game ive played for years.. xD
aliALIali1932 1 year ago 12
no rate and can you make a base or only control unts
joshuacaliber22 1 year ago
@joshuacaliber22 you can only control
spikeman1444 1 year ago
I would like to know if people still play this online as well. Can't believe I missed out on this one.
Joeyboots80 1 year ago
Quick question: Is there still a multiplayer community out there or is there one game with 2 people in it?
Darthlaser56 1 year ago
can you run it is not THAT accurate... it told me i cant run this game but i downloaded the demo and it worked just fine and it was the same case with few other games... its still an okay website to get an idea of what kinda games your pc can run... as for this game i really liked the demo!! so try it out
a9059 1 year ago
this game is so hard.. but still i finished it^^
xXxbryllexXx 2 years ago 3
just go to can i run it on google and it will tell you if you if you can run it
lukethedukea380 2 years ago
Would i need a high rate computor to run this? I've a laptop which is probably a medium when it comes to this. I think i might buy this game tomorrow but im hopeing you dont need a REALLY good comp just a decent one. I checked my specs apparently only my video card is below min specs but barely.
mailman354 2 years ago
dont think so.
isurugi 2 years ago
can u give me the specifications. or yoy could google can you run it and select the game and wait
Timpetot 2 years ago 2
try the demo people still play that multiplayer still
michael3021 2 years ago
I've seen this game in the store, and looks pretty awesome. Why is it not much spoken off???
aussiepassenger 2 years ago
It was, not anymore. I suggest getting it. Losts of people still play online.
sniffyourdogtwice 2 years ago 3
I think Company of Heroes stole a lot of its thunder, but if you look back, WiC received a ton of praise.
YepOkay 2 years ago
Guys I have some questions!! Is this game worth buying?? On a scale of 1 throw 5, 1 being dont buy and 5 being buy it, what would you all rate it as? Plus is it anythinkg like sudden confilct serise? Thanks
BigBronco78 2 years ago
id give it 2.5,instead of having those epic battles between 2 superpowers(something like supreme commander)ure controlling like 2 squads of infantry and 2 tanks.
lidltomat 2 years ago
try the demo
edwardmakesongs 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
why does everyone keep saying this game is new and original?
Ground Control did this YEARS ago without the disgusting patriotism
MilitantOldLady 2 years ago
Yeah patriotism sucks!
aha45 2 years ago 4
do somebody still playing this online?
dodow1234 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i dnt like the camera angles u cant see ur fuking people or tanks
MADagain321 2 years ago
basically the only thing endwar did do that wic didint do was voice command(which actually is near flawless but its the only thing that claims this games fame,but that still doesent make it a better game) also the feature of not being able to free roam with the camera (which really does suck when you experience that).wic just did everything soo much better,especially the explosions! that game was a masterpiece.
hamisharn 3 years ago
great game - the question now will endwar be as good?
Joe7946 3 years ago
not at all in my opinion. endwar is a terrible game. its nothing like this,its camera angles are fucked the actual animations of the general existence of the soldiers and vehicles is pretty croddy too(animation wise that is but the actual graphical imagery is pretty good to an extent) and the effects...the effects are all spritey and generation N64 looking, that only look half decent from a substantial distance(machine gun effects, admittedly look decent for an rts).
hamisharn 3 years ago
gameplay i would prefure world in conflict - its just more fun
but the content and design i would prefure endwar.
world in conflict is single player story and online - which is awesome!
but the theather of war feature in endwar is fantastic - fighting for ground and the moving battlelines is a great concept.
basically, world in conflict get if u have a great pc or get endwar if u only have console
Joe7946 3 years ago 20
@Joe7946
Big factor you left out: Voice command.
Iteachu2beninja 1 year ago
@Joe7946 they might do that in world in conflict 2
00raiser169 1 year ago
No. lol (8 months ago)
030Andre030 2 years ago
Take that C&C! It's the best nuke graphics yet!
Ubermensch4ever 4 years ago
this reminds me alot of red alert 2s story and red alert 3 story
Dante994 3 years ago
apart from the utterly stupid unit names, like the chronomilfsphere or something. And without the tedious and boring base building and with the excellent tactical aid. WIC total pwns CNC
jjm443 3 years ago
I'm keeping my eyes on this game. I hope to get it soon.
josepharte 4 years ago
I'm getting it tomorrow! Can't wait! ^_^
powericed 4 years ago 30
@powericed did u get this game?
manciuxl1 1 year ago
@powericed You should get it tommorw, It's a really good game, I play it all the time!
BeforeThePlagues 7 months ago
good game and review
young128 4 years ago 2
Shud be renamed World in Nukelict.
Seriously, 5 mp games later and every one has ended with a nuke
FortunateSon999 4 years ago
cool game
shankarnoble 4 years ago 2
thnx 4 uploading
teooo 4 years ago 2
im gettin it 2day
zimbo4 4 years ago 2
Nice lookin game and Woot first comment
GoldenVulture 4 years ago