This is the exact situation for which a specific rule was created or written.
See rule 7.07 of the official rules of Baseball per MLB.
"If, with a runner on third base and trying to score by means of a squeeze play or a
steal, the catcher or any other fielder steps on, or in front of home base without possession of the ball, or touches the batter or his bat, the pitcher shall be charged with a balk, the batter shall be awarded first base on the interference and the ball is dead."
All our video vignettes were supervised by Jim Evan, proprietor of the Academy of Professional Umpiring. He is a former MLB umpire and runs one of the 2 official shcools of umpiring that leads to a professional baseball opportunity.
Not all cases of obstruction are immediately a dead ball. Please look before you so harshly leap next time
Your all wrong and even this video is wrong. First off, it's called obstruction, not interferance. Obstruction is an immediate dead ball situation, that means that all play freezes. Since th ball was dead prior to the tag or the runner from 3rd crossing the dish, he must return to 3rd base. The batter is awarded 1st. The only way that the runner from 3rd scores is if the bases are loaded at the time of obstruction, therefore forcing him home. I'm willing to listen if you have rule or case #'s.
@mrlaymansterms1 you are tho one who's wrong whit all respect, in this situation you must call interferience of the catchar plus balk and they both should be aplied, i mean, runner scores and batter goes to first base. i wasn't obstruccion it ws interferience.
@TheCliffater Again the phrasing is wrong here. Obstruction is ruled aganst defense, inteference is offensive. With proof of rule 7.07, I will agree that MLB rules will allow the run to score. Remember there is no such thing as catcher "interference", it is obstruction on the catcher. It's very similar to the over the back that people cry for in basketball, there is no such foul. It's commonly a push.
In this case it is an immediate dead ball because the defense prevented the batter from striking at the ball and he got a runner out.
If the batter had hit ball even though the catcher obstructed the batter it would be a delayed dead ball. You don't stop play because the offense might get a better result then the penalty. After the dust settles the offense gets a choice of the play or the penalty.
@buddaman200522 You must be calling me a dumbass then, I don't know any level of ball that doesn't call defensive "obstruction" a dead ball. In that case the batter is awarded first base. The only way that the runner from third would be awarded home is if he's forced home by trail runners. Do you have a rule or case number to support your train of thought?
I knew it was #3, the runner at third was trying to steal home as soon as the batter was about to hit. Then the crazy catcher had to interfere, so serves him right for being hasty!
This is the exact situation for which a specific rule was created or written.
See rule 7.07 of the official rules of Baseball per MLB.
"If, with a runner on third base and trying to score by means of a squeeze play or a
steal, the catcher or any other fielder steps on, or in front of home base without possession of the ball, or touches the batter or his bat, the pitcher shall be charged with a balk, the batter shall be awarded first base on the interference and the ball is dead."
A: #3
EDGYKNIFE 7 months ago
@EDGYKNIFE tell my umps that
gingerbaitt 6 months ago
All our video vignettes were supervised by Jim Evan, proprietor of the Academy of Professional Umpiring. He is a former MLB umpire and runs one of the 2 official shcools of umpiring that leads to a professional baseball opportunity.
Not all cases of obstruction are immediately a dead ball. Please look before you so harshly leap next time
exposfan1 1 year ago
Your all wrong and even this video is wrong. First off, it's called obstruction, not interferance. Obstruction is an immediate dead ball situation, that means that all play freezes. Since th ball was dead prior to the tag or the runner from 3rd crossing the dish, he must return to 3rd base. The batter is awarded 1st. The only way that the runner from 3rd scores is if the bases are loaded at the time of obstruction, therefore forcing him home. I'm willing to listen if you have rule or case #'s.
mrlaymansterms1 1 year ago
@mrlaymansterms1 you are tho one who's wrong whit all respect, in this situation you must call interferience of the catchar plus balk and they both should be aplied, i mean, runner scores and batter goes to first base. i wasn't obstruccion it ws interferience.
TheCliffater 1 month ago
@TheCliffater Again the phrasing is wrong here. Obstruction is ruled aganst defense, inteference is offensive. With proof of rule 7.07, I will agree that MLB rules will allow the run to score. Remember there is no such thing as catcher "interference", it is obstruction on the catcher. It's very similar to the over the back that people cry for in basketball, there is no such foul. It's commonly a push.
mrlaymansterms1 1 month ago
Idiots, that is not the right call. Interference is offensive. It's call obstruction
mrlaymansterms1 1 year ago
@mrlaymansterms1
Yep, obstruction is defense, interference is offense.
kiknchickn 1 year ago
yeah #3
it would be like a catchers interference in which the batter is awarded first
then it would be like a ball going out of play and the runner is awarded the next base
so the guy on 3rd gets home
JWeez8 3 years ago
its number 3
knducay 3 years ago
In this case it is an immediate dead ball because the defense prevented the batter from striking at the ball and he got a runner out.
If the batter had hit ball even though the catcher obstructed the batter it would be a delayed dead ball. You don't stop play because the offense might get a better result then the penalty. After the dust settles the offense gets a choice of the play or the penalty.
hayblue1 3 years ago
number 3
lgradyl 3 years ago
Anybody that didn't say 3 is a dumbass
buddaman200522 4 years ago
@buddaman200522 You must be calling me a dumbass then, I don't know any level of ball that doesn't call defensive "obstruction" a dead ball. In that case the batter is awarded first base. The only way that the runner from third would be awarded home is if he's forced home by trail runners. Do you have a rule or case number to support your train of thought?
mrlaymansterms1 1 year ago
I knew it was #3, the runner at third was trying to steal home as soon as the batter was about to hit. Then the crazy catcher had to interfere, so serves him right for being hasty!
josegomez101 4 years ago
And he touched the bat, preventing the hitter from bunting.
brzklt 3 years ago