It's funny, i actually have this video on an old cd-rom that I downloaded a few years back. For some reason, nothing will play it. I remembered "staying alive" was actually the music in the background. 64T always had that horrible blue overcast, They should of gone to 100D a long time ago.
Listen to reticulan5, they know what they are talking about. If you take tungsten film outside everything will be blue. they should have used the ektachrome 100D or something.
Wow! If this telecine is real, then Kodachrome looks natural and very beautiful, just like I remembered it from the 80's when my dad was filming us. Ektachrome looks too saturated, I hope this is real data and not exagerated to make Ektachrome look bad... However, I think that this extreme saturation could be corrected with some filter, but I'm not sure. It can certainly be corrected digitally after telecine, but the whole point of a reversal film is to project the original on a big screen!
I think a colour chart test probably would have been a better way to go, but, of course is far less entertaining than a biky clown walking around town
Kodak stopped making K40 in about early 2006. I have two rolls in the fridge i can't wait to use this summer. The only other way to find it is, is to buy expired stuff on ebay, but its usually really old and won't look this good.
The exposure is definately flatter on the 64T - this is would appear to offer more details in the shadows where the K40 (at least with this telecine) crushes the shadows. A lot of variables at play - too many to be sure this is a straightforward A/B comparison. I like certains things about each stock in this clip. K40 will certainly be missed.
I agree with jippo. k40 definitely looks better, and I like the distinct warm feel that sets it apart from other stocks. 64t could look pretty close with a filter, but will never have the same feel as k40.
Well I kinda liked the E64t better, the Kodachrome feels just too warm for outdoors, although the Ektachrome makes it look kinda like a cold winters day. But the last shot definitely doesn't look good in K40.
weird how ektachrome looks better than kodachrome here. Both, however, look terrible. I think it has to do with exposure. And is that kodachrome expired or something?
I,s say the 64 which is a Tungsten balanced film was shot outdoors with no filter correction.That will always give a to cold or blueish tint.E.g look at the movie Gladiator where the Romans are about to battle Germans.
It's funny, i actually have this video on an old cd-rom that I downloaded a few years back. For some reason, nothing will play it. I remembered "staying alive" was actually the music in the background. 64T always had that horrible blue overcast, They should of gone to 100D a long time ago.
combatphil 1 year ago
64T is too blue! every clip I watch it has blue blue blue! its a blue raw stock! I dont like it.
PARRAVISION 1 year ago
Listen to reticulan5, they know what they are talking about. If you take tungsten film outside everything will be blue. they should have used the ektachrome 100D or something.
shamoogyboogy 2 years ago
why does it look so bad?
garrettanderson983 2 years ago
you just need the Sat Night Fever theme over the beginning
pookie67 2 years ago
@pookie67 That's funny, the original clip actually had the sat night fever cover to it.
combatphil 1 year ago
Wow! If this telecine is real, then Kodachrome looks natural and very beautiful, just like I remembered it from the 80's when my dad was filming us. Ektachrome looks too saturated, I hope this is real data and not exagerated to make Ektachrome look bad... However, I think that this extreme saturation could be corrected with some filter, but I'm not sure. It can certainly be corrected digitally after telecine, but the whole point of a reversal film is to project the original on a big screen!
spapakons 2 years ago
Gonna miss that Kodachrome. It was the best.
saullouis 2 years ago
wow thanks for the comparison, what a huge difference the 40 looks amazing the e64t is nice but looks less super8 and more video tape color.
KEAUQ 2 years ago 4
I think a colour chart test probably would have been a better way to go, but, of course is far less entertaining than a biky clown walking around town
fredNielssen 2 years ago 4
It would be instructive to compare the two both in overcast conditions (like here), against direct sunlight and also indoor tungsten situations.
parachuteclubbed 3 years ago
Kodak stopped making K40 in about early 2006. I have two rolls in the fridge i can't wait to use this summer. The only other way to find it is, is to buy expired stuff on ebay, but its usually really old and won't look this good.
1940films 3 years ago
what filters were used when filming these??
StriderXGP 3 years ago
I think only outdoor filter 85.
super8camera 3 years ago
The exposure is definately flatter on the 64T - this is would appear to offer more details in the shadows where the K40 (at least with this telecine) crushes the shadows. A lot of variables at play - too many to be sure this is a straightforward A/B comparison. I like certains things about each stock in this clip. K40 will certainly be missed.
randytate 4 years ago
I agree with jippo. k40 definitely looks better, and I like the distinct warm feel that sets it apart from other stocks. 64t could look pretty close with a filter, but will never have the same feel as k40.
KeyFilmation 4 years ago
Well I kinda liked the E64t better, the Kodachrome feels just too warm for outdoors, although the Ektachrome makes it look kinda like a cold winters day. But the last shot definitely doesn't look good in K40.
Alessandro110 4 years ago
k40 definitely looks better, but with the right filter, 64t could look pretty close.
jippolippo23 4 years ago
hi! did you use a filter while shooting this outdoors?
pasgro 4 years ago
weird how ektachrome looks better than kodachrome here. Both, however, look terrible. I think it has to do with exposure. And is that kodachrome expired or something?
AmazingShoestring 4 years ago
the kodachrome was warmer. the ekta looked like blue shit. could be cause this footage is shit. wait for the epic light then do a test. stupid clown.
betheopian 4 years ago
I,s say the 64 which is a Tungsten balanced film was shot outdoors with no filter correction.That will always give a to cold or blueish tint.E.g look at the movie Gladiator where the Romans are about to battle Germans.
reticulan5 4 years ago 2
nice, and thanks. do they still sell K40, i kinda like the colour better. the 64t seems to bleed blue everywhere. what did you transfer on?
sde999 4 years ago
keep your motor running.... headed to the highway!! looking for adventure...
pedroluque 4 years ago
What camera did you use? Was it left on auto-exposure? fun-ky!!
Kinematographer 5 years ago
ATA, yeah!
jemof 5 years ago