One shouldn't call one who doesn't believe in the extra-natural an atheist. That's like saying if you don't believe in X then you are a-Xist, that is, if you don't believe in X you are somehow at fault. The choice is a false one. The fault lies with the those that have less proof and yet still believe unreasonably or unquestioningly, we humble proof-ists may still be wrong, though faith-ists have no reason to think they are on the high ground, they have it all to prove, that is 'make reasonable'
The question was not that interesting. Clearly we're not the "end of evolution", though we might be trying to put an end to it on this planet. Nevertheless, the answer reveals once again those false dichotomies in people's heads.
One shouldn't call one who doesn't believe in the extra-natural an atheist. That's like saying if you don't believe in X then you are a-Xist, that is, if you don't believe in X you are somehow at fault. The choice is a false one. The fault lies with the those that have less proof and yet still believe unreasonably or unquestioningly, we humble proof-ists may still be wrong, though faith-ists have no reason to think they are on the high ground, they have it all to prove, that is 'make reasonable'
midlantica 2 years ago
yea,"God" what IS that? I have No idea.
qaplatlhinganmaH 2 years ago
your a deuchebag
apez3534 4 years ago
The question was not that interesting. Clearly we're not the "end of evolution", though we might be trying to put an end to it on this planet. Nevertheless, the answer reveals once again those false dichotomies in people's heads.
leporidus 5 years ago
Does he actually get around to answering the question?
russelsparadox 5 years ago
The question was null.
davidjakewillis 5 years ago 2