Added: 3 years ago
From: youtoobmama
Views: 2,525
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • No call it looked like he bellied up and fell backwards and little contact

  • Looks like a total flop to me. I would rather have seen a no call as the defender acted to make it look like he got ran over. 

  • I've got a no call.

    Pause it at 0:30. The defender has obtained LGP, but doesn't fall backwards right away. This leads me to believe that he used his legs to help him fall backwards. So that removes the PC in my humble opinion.

    And not a block since LGP was maintained.

    I believe the a no call is the best call in this situation.

  • I agree with the no call, but I can't really complain about the block. The defender doesn't appear to give the player room to turn around and not contact him; block if anything.

  • I think it coulda gone either way.,,or I agree with the awbuckles on the no-call. I think this was a defensible call on the part of the ref because the defender, while his feet are planted, is moving his body TOWARD the offensive player (i.e. "bellying up"). it's a stretch, but I understand how the ref...in real time...could see the defender moving into the offensive player.

  • Should have been nothing. After watching the replay 23 makes hardly no contact on the defense and he fades away.

  • PLAYER!!!!!!!!!!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more