Plato was describing and quite correctly the demise of his own civilization who were predominant at the time. Remember they had conquered the Egyptians, the Babylonians had gone and he came up with a parable. He made sure it was a place that was beyond their adventures somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean. That is all. Atlantis was a myth, a warning, that is it. All those who have an interest, have a book to sell. As mentioned at the outset.
I think that what Plato was describing can be found on the west coast of Europe and Africa including Briton,these where the original gardens or ghettos,gated communities with moats around the out side,the moats were to keep rodents and other vermin out including larger toothed predators.and I believe that Plato named places that have similar names today.some of these names are still used in the English language.the languages have changed but the phonetics have stayed the same.
The more we investigate, the more knowledge we gain, but on aftereffect, as deeper we investigate the uncovered mysteries of the earth and universe the dangerous one's life could become. a real Danger could be impose on one's life to change and hide to the outside world and live it with one's self forever. Knowledge that should be kept forever as we continue researching, we tend to keep it to ourselves to not cause such dangers could immerse on the whole people of the world.
The writing wouldn't necessarily be identical if it had a common source. French and Italian have the same source (Latin), but aren't the same language.
This is stupid. Obvious pyramids were build to be mountains or mounds or stepping stones to the Gods. The Sumerians had it the Chinese. Some Hindu temples resemble pyramids. The mound builders of the mississpi river valley.
whos to say that they are carbon dating the first people to be at that site that is why carbon dating these sites is not reliable at all. explain to me why the great great pyramid has no hyroglyphics inside of it. and the tomb also is clear of anything. my guess is the larger pyramids were there first and were attempted to be replicated by the people of egypt at the time. 2 much evidence of a global culture
i dont believe in atlantis per se but i do believe humans like us have been civilized a lot longer then mainstream science says. gobekli tepe in turkey and the sunken city off the coast of north west india are more then enough proof. i really like shows like this. there are some crack theories no doubt but there's also some intersting stuff that at the very least makes you think in a way you were never taught in school. 1 day it may all come together. thanks for sharing the vid.
humans didn't spring into being separately and independantly on separate continents. Evolution occurs because DNA reproduces itself and passes information to the next generation. humans do the same thing - so their products evolve with them. ideas brought with them by non-professionals will go through evolutionary re-learning stages - to reproduce the great things they remember (or their grandparents spoke of).
humans didn't spring into being separately and independantly on separate continents. Evolution occurs because DNA reproduces itself and passes information to the next generation. humans do the same thing - so their products evolve with them. ideas brought with them by non-professionals will go through evolutionary re-learning stages - to reproduce the great things they remember.
i heard a theory that egyptians were mexicans, close to peru, and just illegally hopped on over to egypt, as its a cultural necessity for a mexican to break laws and jump borders. my videos are awesome too.
ATLANTIS does it comes from the word atlantic, where lies the atlantic ocean? is it about the lost cities from atlantis, sunken city.. all i know is it about the sunken civilization. is it a yes or no? how come we got through almost all over parts of the world, jungle, desert and mountains?
@DeMachman R U krasy? Check here "LAS FIGURAS DE ACAMBARO IN MEXICO" to get the REAL truth, also " APOLLO 20 SYNOPSIS" , TO KNOW THE ANTIQUITY of Mayas and Aztecs and from WERE THEY COME, before YOU say anything. MAYAS COHABITED WITH DINOSAURS 500 MILLIONS YEARS AGO BEFORE THEIR EXTINCTION. And Egyptian all they have 10 thousand years antiquity; ALSO the PILOT Maya woman FOUND ON SPACE SHIP by Apollo 20 on moon surface has ONE million years antiquity and with just MAYA PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
The Pyramids can be built if enough resources are made available. The relevant question is WHY? In ancient Egypt it was: the tyrant ruler wanted it done. At that time organisational capability n technology had been developed very highly to build and maintain the Nile Valley irrigation system. At the peak of Egytian civilisation, all this was diverted was diverted and the resources were wasted to cater to the ego of a single person or group. A world tyrant can do it now. People? Irrelevant- DIE!
The truth of the matter is that most of worlds masses actually like being deceived. The primary reason pyramids cannot be replicated is because the current established order through the devices of information starvation and propaganda has indoctrinated us to believe that there is nothing greater than ourselves. If everything the history channel broadcasts is believed to be fact, then it is only a testament as to how man has become more degenerate than his old world ancestor. Wake Up Sheeple.
The Discovery Channel should be renamed the "Cover-Up" Channel as the documentaries they produce always support the status quo, conventional and main stream; not just in this area of crypto-archeology but in things such as the JFK Assassination.; they are very much the proponents of the Lone Nut theory.
yes, exactly this should be common knowledge to everyone by now..
-
even though this documentary is very sneaky sneaky its quite interesting though it seems very dormant with its geo's some seem very contrcadicting to what the narrator is saying
obelisks had the same shape why do they think that obelisks were pointed at the top..just like the capstone of the pyramids, which was usually gilded in gold. the pyramids were religious symbols.
lol science can be so ignorant..they didn't build pyramids because it was the easiest way The pyramid shape Egyptian pyramids were modeled on a sacred, pointed stone called the benben. The benben symbolized the rays of the sun; ancient texts claimed that pharaohs reached the heavens via sunbeams, the pyramids were a symbol.
just because civilizations all over the world didn't originate in atlantis, doesn't mean it never existed. It just means few if any survived, or they were lost to history by integrating with other cultures. I believe it existed.
Dont demoralize the Pyramid technology. If they were as smart as being able to construct a pyramid in 20 years at the rate of one stone block per 2 minutes, then they could create structures that could stand tall that didnt have this triangular slope. Pyramids were created because they conduct a very particular Earth energy that resonates across certain nodes on Earth. Pyramids just happen to be the most effective shape.
@djfeas001 I agree with you, pyramids conduct a huge amount of energy, that's why it's shape is used so much by spiritualists, pagans, witches & healers, not to mention many many others. don't the pyramids also sit on lay lines?
@saif316 WOW....where did you go to school? Pangaea (the supercontinent that was the giant land mass before it split into what we now know as Eurasia, Africa, Antarctica, Australia, India and North and South America) existed 200 million years ago LONG before there were people. It has NOTHING to do with these civilizations. GOD people....get an education!
@saif316 The point is you maybe right you maybe wrong. Who is to say you have not said the truth? Carbon dating might not be entirely accurate. let alone our education on history To civilisation. We follow scholars- the y are human beings.- they did not live in that period. Maybe they are totally way off point in all the investigations and conclusions.
WOW you are such an elitist prick... in fact with the "get an education" comment, it shows us that you have learned very little yourself, and it is highly offensive and quite ignorant and arrogant of you..take a sociology class why dont you... because this information isn't available to everyone..oh .... I bet you also like to correct grammar? don't bother..
yeah that idiot can say 200 million years ago but the flood happened about 10,000 years ago and who is to say that wasn't a pole shift and caused the land masses to split up
we currently have more than one written language yet we share the same technological information....couldnt ancient civilizations do the same? no i guess not right cause we are so unique (sarcasm inserted here)
@hez1919 we have written language and technology that allows for nearly instant sharing of that information. The world is a {figuratively} much smaller place now than when it took weeks to travel a small distance.
You can't compare the sharing of information in the present day of the Web and planes and cars (not to mention that we also venture into space) with the ancient civilizations and their methods of travel and communication.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@babette616 what is ridiculous is your grasp of history and knowledge on this subject...the ancient myths say people came in boats without paddles or sails suggesting the civ. of 10,500 bc had technology....now on to the languages again....so you seem to think that lets say just 1000 years ago when it took months to cross a continent that there were no shared languages on earth?????...ancient civ pre 10,500 bc likely went to space as well since carvings and pics show space suits .
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@hez1919 keep an open mind when thinking about these ancient civilizations...egyptologists have gotten everything wrong and still deny sphinx was built before the egyptian civilization...geologists know when it was exposed to rain yet no rain in egypt when the egyptians ruled so how did sphinx get water damage? see what i mean? even experts get it wrong...salso there are primitive and advanced human civilizations on earth RIGHT NOW dummy and if the world got smoked we would show them the way
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@hez1919 just like some ancient vcivilizationo did for us after the last great cataclysm which caused the water to rise 400 ft (and gave birth to noah's arc story) wolly mammoths have been found frozen in ice with food in thier mouth...how fast of a world disaster happened for something that big to be frozen where it stands....watch more and lern more about all the stories and forget about what they tell you to think and think for yourself...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@hez1919 and if you want final proof that there was an advanced civilzation pre 10,500 bc then look at the temple they found off the coast of japan that is UNDER WATER....making it 100% obviously built before the water levels rose....the last time the water was that low was pre 10,500 bc....the proof is out there we are just too stupid to see it....remember how many people died because the world was round...its not such a crime to think there was an advanced civ like us before....
@hez1919...the majority of scientists say the Yonaguni Monument is a natural rock formation. There is no proof. All of you new age folks don't get it. We don't have closed minds. We just want proof! An yet there is no definitive proof. It's not a crime to think there was advanced civ, but talking like you certain without evidence is ridiculous. Just because you want it to be true, doesn't make it true. If you were a trained historian, you'd understand that.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@scott797 ok no problem would you like proof there were people here on earth advanced before the 3 great floods? in malta there are cliff caves the people live in and 80 feet under the water there are more caves that are carved the exact same way...the last time thos caves were above water was pre 8000 bc...also the japanese ancients used to use natural rock formations and add thier own carvings..kind of like north american natives...they wanted to be part of nature
@hez1919..I asked for proof, not information about rock formations and the malta caves, neither of which can be dated accurately. And most would date those to no more than 3,000 thousands years ago. Are there any inscriptions? pottery? anything that would indicate this advanced civilization you claim existed. I know, you'll say I'm ignoring facts. But i see no facts, just crazy ideas based off of hollywood movies.
@scott797 you are ignoring facts...those caves in malta...there are some UNDER WATER...the last time that land was above water level was before 8000 bc when historians say there was no human civilisation...so who carved the caves that are under the water then?
@hez1919..I don't understand..are you saying there are carvings on walls in underground caves, or that there are caves underwater? Because that's not unusual..unless you can prove they were made by tools...any why would such advanced people live in caves anyway? Early man did but they were not part of any advanced civ.
@scott797 the caves are carved out to be more habitable like the ones still on the surface....not a natural erosive thing...malta historians even admit that people used to live in those very caves on land...and the exact same caves are underwater
@hez1919 oh, ok I get ya. Sorry we have a miss communication... so you're saying 8,000 b.c. there were men living in caves? But, herz, we have fossil remains of early man dating back millions of years. The latest before 10, 000 years ago. These primitive people often lived in caves. It doesn't indicate an advanced civilization. If they found a ray gun in one of those caves, then we're talking..lol..:)
@scott797 so if they were dug by treasure seekers. how come there is no holes leading to the chambers? why does the sonar show objects in the chambers? im just curious where you evidence is that it was dug by treasure hunters. Cuz thats never been said till you. Also if it was already dug up, than Egypt would keep it open as they have with most of their digs. Its their Linege and their History. No reason for them to hide any of it.
@JCeiver612...I read it in a book by Zahi Hawass, I believe it was called "The Secrets of the Sphinx: Restoration Past and Present"...there is a video on youtube called "Drilling under the Sphinx" where Hawass and Lehrner both explain what's under the sphinx. You should check it out. They're respected scholars on Egyptian history. There are no chambers, I'm sorry..:(
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@scott797 if you send me one more baseless reply asking for some forms of proof which i have given i will block you...im not interested in arguing with someone who has a closed mind and cannot even acknowledge that there are other possibilities than those they believe to be true
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@scott797 you arent discussing these issues...you are just saying that what anyone believes other than what you believe is wrong(not even you since you say experts say its natural) ....you are the fucking reason humanity suffers because you cannot think outside a box that someone else put you into
@hez1919 Thinking out of the box is fine, but if you don't have sufficient proof for your theories than it's just talk. You say there were advanced civilizations. I say prove it, you can't. I can't prove they didn't exist either. So we're left with the question, what is more probable? That these advanced civs existed and left no obvious evidence of their existence or that they never existed at all? and Herz, there's no need to insult me or blame me for societies ills...lol..this isn't personal.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@scott797 also i am agnostic...i dont have the answers and neither do you or anyone else...this is a process where we (humans) figure stuff out ...what you believe COULD be right...what i believe COULD be right.
@hez1919 what we do is use the evidence we have and decide what is more probable. And what you're claiming isn't probable with what we actually know. All you need to do is look at fossil remains of ancient man, the latest which date to 10,000 years ago. look up the "Minatogawa Man" and the "Hobbit" remains. These are the advanced humans you speak of, AND this is evidence, ACTUAL remains of early man, found often with simple stone tools. What you offer is wild speculation, not proof.
holes in the ground that i could build..lead to building the great pyramid..the guy is on drugs like saying well done you dug yr grave now go build the empire state ! Can you honestly take germans seriously ?
what other invisible information could we produce by thoroughly examining these visible monuments (undeniable and unhidable by any government.note:many times the only information the masses have to go by is public, publicly funded sometimes skepticized groups and their opinions)
using modern technology what can we decipher about these "primative pyramids" (npi =)
modern technology shows ten thousand years ago the "great pyramid" in egypt lines up with a constellation and the spynx which points directly to the east at the same time pointed towards the consellation leo?
and how does the great pyramid fall on an invisible equatorial line.
Still, there's alot of things we DO know. And it makes more sense to start in THAT end rather than in the other end ;) This is something people tend to forget, thinking about God etc. It makes more sense that he doesn't exist rather than him existing. Taking what we DO know in concideration.
@CHRIS1974100 There are is already an 11.500 year old civilization. Gobekli Tepe in Turkey oldest temples in the World yet discovered but there are probably other lost civilzations laying undiscovered around the world some sites are already known but have been improperly dated.
There was a dome in mexico as old as the pyramids the dome is next to piramids of the city chichen itza. so the guy who said i this video that ancient ciilizations couldnt build domes isnt entirely true
Well this is a very one sided documentary, there not really connecting the dots, these academic types fail to see the important resonance. If it was a gradual progression then with today's technology why can't the great pyramid be replicated?? Cos there is not a crane in existence big enough or any device to lift monolith blocks to such heights. Not forgetting the geometric and earth precision, Yep Egyptian slave labor that LOL
Those things that you said, and also the matter of how on Earth the Egyptians knew to orient the Pyramids to true North. One thing that no Egyptian of that time would have any knowledge for.
LMFAO! Are you F'ing serious? Have you not seen the enormous cranes that build skyscrappers? Those blocks weigh a few tons - these cranes can lift 100+ tons at a time.
If you want to talk about precision, look at the new huge building in Dubai.
yeah but the biggest pyramid is 13 acres at the base and 50 thousand and some feet tall no crane could reach the middle of that from the base to stack those blocks like that think with your head dumbass
@obione888 there are modern cranes that can lift over 50 tons hundreds of feet in the air. Crawler cranes can lift over 500 tons!..Most of the blocks in the pyramids are 20-60 tons. To claim we can build skycrapers that have elevators, electrcity and windows etc..lol...but can't build the pyramids is ridiculous. Why would we want to? they're primitive structures. They're blocks of stone! If they were so advanced why couldn't they put some windows in that shit, maybe some air-conditioning?..lol..
i agree, but alternatively, it would have wasted too much time just to re-create one and noone has that monetary captial to do it? It doesn't prove anything to create it by the way, so archaelogist only re-create using models.
@obione888 dont you find it funny how scientists today actually state that the pyramids cannot be replicated as we are not technologically advanced enough to get them perfectly aligned as they are but yet people still believe their stupid text books which tell them SLAVES built the pyramids? umm all i have to say is GET A FKN CLUE YOU IDIOT PEOPLE! YOU HAVE CONTRADICTING INFORMATION IN YOUR FACE ON A DAILY BASIS BUT YET YOU CHOSE TO IGNORE IT! wake upppppppppp aghhhhhh
@obione888 The business with no crane being able to lift the rocks involved is an utter non-sequitur, considering that no one believes the rocks were ever lifted, but were instead pushed onto ramps and quarried on site. Also, the pyramids were constructed by paid day laborers, not slaves.
@obione888 u r so true and what about the fact that this was happing all over at about the same time ... i beleave that there time line is off away off and if its one sided then no real science can be done srry but they need to step out side the box and stop saying the same thing that came befor them its like there reading the same book over and over
@obione888 It could be recreated today with what the Egyptians had; nobody's decadent enough to try it the traditional way. There's even a recently discovered spiral structure -inside- the pyramid unconnected to the rest of the chambers that was used as an interior ramp.
Although this documentary asks/states interesting ideas; They have overlooked tons of things... What about the sphinx, baalbek, the temple mount, etc?
Theres no douht that mordern archeology needs to uncover more of our past ,and with that said i dont believe(according to bits n pieces we'v gathered) that the Athenians wer around almost 11,000 to 12,000 years ago
Wait a tic....1st let me say ,i dont believe Atlantis brought knowledge 2 da world, the only thing that i must dispute is I do remember reading and hearin on the Disc. channel that da Egyptions did in fact have some refrence to "Atlantis" ,wat might hav been misinturpeted was the amount of years past ,it wasent mayb 9000 years but 900 years prior to the Egyption records or refrence to a place we call "Atlantis"
that women has the most annoying voice i ever heard it like actually sucks the blood underneath my nails when she would met me personally and said one word i would knock her teeth out and cut her toung of so no one would ever have hear that voice
a voice that could peel paint? my mom has that.. when she yells my hearing fades. i guess it's damage from childhood, i can't hear those tones anymore.. heh heh he
We are staring at Giza pyramids for 3000 years (may be for even 10000 years), but we are still have no clue why they were built. How unbelievable is that???
Concrete thing are always easier to understand than abstract thing. Meaning.... the reason to understand someone else is work is not more important than their results. Imagine if eistein had decide to be a stand up comedy host rather than a physicist.
Imagine what Einstein would be saying today. He ended up saying his own General Relativity didn't give the answers he was looking for. I'm pretty sure that he would not be as popular if he lived during our times. Btw, Velikovsky predicted Jupiter's magnetic field and few other bits before they were confirmed.
Hypothesize that some do know how they were built. Chances are they are withholding knowledge for their own selfish agenda's, or simply fear mass hysteria if sharing the truth. Either way they are trying control knowledge pertaining to some being (human or not) far more intelligent than themselves. Whoever built them were far more advanced than these info packrats then, and today. Think about the descendants of the builder's level of intelligence today, 1000's of years later. Peace.
Keep in mind, all these archeological expeditions are expensive and someone is sponsoring them. So, these sponsors and archeologists themselves want to see results. The best result is discovery, sensation. Just like all of us, these people want to get bonus, promoted to museum director and secure their retirement. I can see them manipulating truth, fabricating evidence and misleading people all the time. And, naïve us believe them.
they are trying to see if some of the atlantians got away from the flood and went around teaching other primitive people things such as farming and building certain things such as pyramids.
Instead of sending money, we should send a U-Haul and tell people to move to where the food is!!!! I hear this shit about people walking for days at a time to get water, MOVE CLOSER TO THE DAMN RIVER!!!!!
allanpineda, there will always be people starving in the world, no matter what the others are doing with their money, that does not mean that money should not be invested in science.
Maybe not, Cal Tech, MIT and Moscow have successfully converted light from a lazer into carbon. Think Star Trek Replicators. It took enough energy to power LA for a day and they only got a tiny spot of carbon, but in 50 years famine could be a bad memory
sure.. civilization is inebitable as eventually all will form into one.. but would the church or those muslims ever have a space program?, or goto the moon?.. no..so they aren't civilized.
I accidentally gave a thumbs up. SOME who are influenced by their faith and belief sets are influenced by them in more positive senses. Let us not be so harsh making a blanket statement about "them" not being civilized. At the core of it all, faiths of all sorts teach principles to live by. Just in their own words, stories, writings, etc..... All the same stuff, just said in a different fashion.
Killing in the name of... Sacrifice in the name of ... Sacrifice oneself to become a martyr. Yes, exactly. Ups and downs for sure, but to define a group of people as uncivilizied because of such practices is very narrow minded. People who are so devoted to their faith do not see such things as uncivilized. In fact, not going the whole 9 yards in such a way was likely viewed as uncivilized. Let's try to keep in mind that other people's perceptions can be different than yours.
ok, how about comments about adults with imaginary friends.. i should change my argument to reflect my hatred towards the human condition and human nature and why the social animal needs the bible stories to train themselves on how to treat others.. but then i might sound like someone who was misguided into hating the jews when in fact the entire human race is a pedantic cluster fuck of the meek
the pyramids are energy capacitors...they hold earth's energy...look up quantum pphysics to understand that.. the pyramids interact with our thoughts... our thoughts have frequencies..
the pyramid is a logical conclusion from the desire to build a tall structure. Mountains are cone or pyramid shaped, tall hills are usually in a cone or pyramid shape, ancient humans actually had a brain, believe it or not, and they observed the structure of tall formations of hills or mountains, and copied it in a neat structure called a pyramid. Whoever thinks that its somehow unlikely are retarded. People love the idea of religion and propagate nones sense.
I don't understand y they left off the Olmec people from what I know they pre-date the maya. There's a place in Guatemala called Monte alto were sum sculpture's,pottery n temple's n have been carbon dated(1800-2500bc)oldest known "civilized" people in mesoamerica, sure they were pre-Olmec people(hunter's n gathrer's)but did not leave monument's or pottery to carbon date only clovis point(12,000bc) spears. Great vid but does not give the same info like national geographic or archiology today.
Everybody has a need to know what exactly happened, OK. Do you realize that we are all the descendants of the survivors of those great civilizations? That a huge cataclism covered everything and that only a few people were left alive to start from scratch? None of those survivors could salvage a thing. How can one construct a great building with bare hands? The first survivors died and then their children, so there was no one left with the knowledge of how those constructions were built.
maybe they thought bout triangles or wanted to build mountains that showed their gods or theyre dead pharaos the way to some stars they should go ...well i dont know but it is mysterious and kewl ^^
there's a reason why there's so many holes in history.. there's alot thats been lost and purposely forgotten.. Thats why most africans dont have too much knowledge of there history. Just like the shattered noses of the egyptian sculptures were an attempt to take credit themselves or discredit the true inhabitants. I refuse to listen to most archeologists, there is a term called 'scientific racism' its using your league and position to propose obsolete and ideas that are entirely opinions.
like how the sphinx has water damage bu the leading Egyptian archeologist's. Abdu Swhai or w/e his name is on history channel says it was from the wind? Water damage would prove the sphinx is over 12,000 years old. which would date way before any other civilization. Also They wont let anyone go into the chamber under the left paw of the sphinx because they dont want to damage the door. but they used explosives to open the pyramids...
thats interesting I've heard something about that, but what I here from one source or, book, or TV network, its always some misinformation, and contradicts something else I've heard.. It's too bad we all don't have access and an go ourselves and get primary account of what other people have proposed to us.
@JCeiver612 His name is Zahi Hawass, and there is no chamber under the left paw. There is a tunnel under the tail section and on its back..Both lead to nothing. It's assumed they were dug by treasure seekers. They've drilled under the Sphinx, there's nothing there, sorry..:( If you can find a reputable source to prove me wrong, I'd love to hear it. I've taught ancient history for many years, love when people prove me wrong. Good luck!
@JCeiver612 His name is Zahi Hawass, and there is no chamber under the left paw. There is a tunnel under the tail section and on its back..Both lead to nothing. It's assumed they were dug by treasure seekers. They've drilled under the Sphinx, there's nothing there, sorry..:( If you can find a reputable source to prove me wrong, I'd love to hear it. I've taught ancient history for many years, love when people prove me wrong. Good luck!
@JCeiver612 His name is Zahi Hawass, and there is no chamber under the left paw. There is a tunnel under the tail section and on its back..Both lead to nothing. It's assumed they were dug by treasure seekers. They've drilled under the Sphinx, there's nothing there, sorry..:( If you can find a reputable source to prove me wrong, I'd love to hear it. I've taught ancient history for many years, love when people prove me wrong. Good luck!
Plato was describing and quite correctly the demise of his own civilization who were predominant at the time. Remember they had conquered the Egyptians, the Babylonians had gone and he came up with a parable. He made sure it was a place that was beyond their adventures somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean. That is all. Atlantis was a myth, a warning, that is it. All those who have an interest, have a book to sell. As mentioned at the outset.
mik99D 1 month ago
I think that what Plato was describing can be found on the west coast of Europe and Africa including Briton,these where the original gardens or ghettos,gated communities with moats around the out side,the moats were to keep rodents and other vermin out including larger toothed predators.and I believe that Plato named places that have similar names today.some of these names are still used in the English language.the languages have changed but the phonetics have stayed the same.
gogogeedus 2 months ago
The music makes me feel like I am in a horror movie from the 60's
HateJustinBieber1000 3 months ago
The more we investigate, the more knowledge we gain, but on aftereffect, as deeper we investigate the uncovered mysteries of the earth and universe the dangerous one's life could become. a real Danger could be impose on one's life to change and hide to the outside world and live it with one's self forever. Knowledge that should be kept forever as we continue researching, we tend to keep it to ourselves to not cause such dangers could immerse on the whole people of the world.
shindayuki 4 months ago
Comment removed
iDrownKittns 6 months ago
they haven't uncovered jack.
mail2vpsinghh 6 months ago
LOL. People still believe in god. Fucking stupid.
cochranexyz 7 months ago 4
2:58 ... is that a nike donkey?
simonorman 7 months ago
The writing wouldn't necessarily be identical if it had a common source. French and Italian have the same source (Latin), but aren't the same language.
Gilari 8 months ago
PUMA PUNKU
KungFatty 8 months ago
If western people didn't kill all those wonderful cultures, the search for truth might have been easier :/
ObeyTheKiwi 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ObeyTheKiwi We didn't kill all those cultures ass.
Luigi84289 4 months ago
This is stupid. Obvious pyramids were build to be mountains or mounds or stepping stones to the Gods. The Sumerians had it the Chinese. Some Hindu temples resemble pyramids. The mound builders of the mississpi river valley.
SaveChinaTiger 9 months ago
Atlantis could have had more than one alphabet
narutoandbleachrulez 9 months ago
whos to say that they are carbon dating the first people to be at that site that is why carbon dating these sites is not reliable at all. explain to me why the great great pyramid has no hyroglyphics inside of it. and the tomb also is clear of anything. my guess is the larger pyramids were there first and were attempted to be replicated by the people of egypt at the time. 2 much evidence of a global culture
AneierHSNO4 1 year ago
Atlantis
MrAaronmalin 1 year ago
i dont believe in atlantis per se but i do believe humans like us have been civilized a lot longer then mainstream science says. gobekli tepe in turkey and the sunken city off the coast of north west india are more then enough proof. i really like shows like this. there are some crack theories no doubt but there's also some intersting stuff that at the very least makes you think in a way you were never taught in school. 1 day it may all come together. thanks for sharing the vid.
TheMoosenuts 1 year ago
i wish these postings would work right the first time so duplicates don't occur so frequently.
suedonym0 1 year ago
humans didn't spring into being separately and independantly on separate continents. Evolution occurs because DNA reproduces itself and passes information to the next generation. humans do the same thing - so their products evolve with them. ideas brought with them by non-professionals will go through evolutionary re-learning stages - to reproduce the great things they remember (or their grandparents spoke of).
suedonym0 1 year ago
humans didn't spring into being separately and independantly on separate continents. Evolution occurs because DNA reproduces itself and passes information to the next generation. humans do the same thing - so their products evolve with them. ideas brought with them by non-professionals will go through evolutionary re-learning stages - to reproduce the great things they remember.
suedonym0 1 year ago
There are pyramids all over this documentary but there is surely no Atlantis or talk about it in here...
supernova8370 1 year ago
i heard a theory that egyptians were mexicans, close to peru, and just illegally hopped on over to egypt, as its a cultural necessity for a mexican to break laws and jump borders. my videos are awesome too.
1973mazdarx4coupe 1 year ago
*Clicks* Atlantis Uncovered Part 3: hoping to hear some cool theories about Atlantis.
First seven seconds of video: "The SAME bricks, laid in the SAME way, to build the SAME style of walls, with door ways in the SAME positions... "
WTF o.0?
CalvinOrosaa 1 year ago
ATLANTIS does it comes from the word atlantic, where lies the atlantic ocean? is it about the lost cities from atlantis, sunken city.. all i know is it about the sunken civilization. is it a yes or no? how come we got through almost all over parts of the world, jungle, desert and mountains?
DC19628 1 year ago
South American pyramids wre built by Egyptian tourists
DeMachman 1 year ago
Comment removed
mextender 1 year ago
@DeMachman R U krasy? Check here "LAS FIGURAS DE ACAMBARO IN MEXICO" to get the REAL truth, also " APOLLO 20 SYNOPSIS" , TO KNOW THE ANTIQUITY of Mayas and Aztecs and from WERE THEY COME, before YOU say anything. MAYAS COHABITED WITH DINOSAURS 500 MILLIONS YEARS AGO BEFORE THEIR EXTINCTION. And Egyptian all they have 10 thousand years antiquity; ALSO the PILOT Maya woman FOUND ON SPACE SHIP by Apollo 20 on moon surface has ONE million years antiquity and with just MAYA PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
mextender 1 year ago
@mextender It was a joke, sorry. You didn't really think that Egypt Air was flying at that time, do you?
DeMachman 1 year ago
@DeMachman Not problem.
mextender 1 year ago
I Think I know how the pyramids were made
LemonLimeLaughter 1 year ago
@LemonLimeLaughter ok tell me ur thoughts on this ????
eric0u812 1 year ago
if there are any sort of ruins left standing they would long ago been raped by "natives"
Mik5469 1 year ago
I thought this was a documentary about Atlantis... NOT PYRAMIDS!!!!!
KitsuneTails8 1 year ago 16
The Pyramids can be built if enough resources are made available. The relevant question is WHY? In ancient Egypt it was: the tyrant ruler wanted it done. At that time organisational capability n technology had been developed very highly to build and maintain the Nile Valley irrigation system. At the peak of Egytian civilisation, all this was diverted was diverted and the resources were wasted to cater to the ego of a single person or group. A world tyrant can do it now. People? Irrelevant- DIE!
gopalannarayanan 1 year ago
i hate how the story kinda changes focus from atlantis to pyramids and such.
229idontgiveafuck 1 year ago
there are pyramids in china too, nobody dares talk about them.
MrPiejacker 1 year ago
The truth of the matter is that most of worlds masses actually like being deceived. The primary reason pyramids cannot be replicated is because the current established order through the devices of information starvation and propaganda has indoctrinated us to believe that there is nothing greater than ourselves. If everything the history channel broadcasts is believed to be fact, then it is only a testament as to how man has become more degenerate than his old world ancestor. Wake Up Sheeple.
jodyjerm30 1 year ago
The Discovery Channel should be renamed the "Cover-Up" Channel as the documentaries they produce always support the status quo, conventional and main stream; not just in this area of crypto-archeology but in things such as the JFK Assassination.; they are very much the proponents of the Lone Nut theory.
RPenta 1 year ago
@babette616
yes, exactly this should be common knowledge to everyone by now..
-
even though this documentary is very sneaky sneaky its quite interesting though it seems very dormant with its geo's some seem very contrcadicting to what the narrator is saying
Melvillemortis0108 1 year ago 5
So civilization has come down to a collection of ignorant wankers loudly proclaiming how stupid they are on Youtube. Yay.
cochranexyz 1 year ago
why do people argue on youtube? o.O
sandman189 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
frikin Discovery Channel - debunker's sponsored by NWO... This is dusty close-minded archaeologist blah blah...
waste of time...
NVVOisREAL 1 year ago
Comment removed
NVVOisREAL 1 year ago
obelisks had the same shape why do they think that obelisks were pointed at the top..just like the capstone of the pyramids, which was usually gilded in gold. the pyramids were religious symbols.
aaugoaa 1 year ago
lol science can be so ignorant..they didn't build pyramids because it was the easiest way The pyramid shape Egyptian pyramids were modeled on a sacred, pointed stone called the benben. The benben symbolized the rays of the sun; ancient texts claimed that pharaohs reached the heavens via sunbeams, the pyramids were a symbol.
aaugoaa 1 year ago
its predators guys.. they teach us how to build pyramid
abcdefcuk030 1 year ago
just because civilizations all over the world didn't originate in atlantis, doesn't mean it never existed. It just means few if any survived, or they were lost to history by integrating with other cultures. I believe it existed.
MsStormcrow 1 year ago
Dont demoralize the Pyramid technology. If they were as smart as being able to construct a pyramid in 20 years at the rate of one stone block per 2 minutes, then they could create structures that could stand tall that didnt have this triangular slope. Pyramids were created because they conduct a very particular Earth energy that resonates across certain nodes on Earth. Pyramids just happen to be the most effective shape.
djfeas001 1 year ago
@djfeas001 I agree with you, pyramids conduct a huge amount of energy, that's why it's shape is used so much by spiritualists, pagans, witches & healers, not to mention many many others. don't the pyramids also sit on lay lines?
MsStormcrow 1 year ago
the musics a bit dramatic isnt it
bricksalegend 1 year ago
Umm...hundreds of years ago it says that the whole world is connected to each other like a complete puzzle right? a Pangea?
Any way, if that is true where is Atlantis?
cristiancaga99 1 year ago
before the land masses split apart wouldn't that put South America fairly close to Africa and Egypt?
KnightedAngel 2 years ago
@KnightedAngel
You're right, in fact the eastern coastline of South America fits almost perfectly with the western coastline of Africa, just like a jig saw puzzle
saif316 2 years ago
@saif316 WOW....where did you go to school? Pangaea (the supercontinent that was the giant land mass before it split into what we now know as Eurasia, Africa, Antarctica, Australia, India and North and South America) existed 200 million years ago LONG before there were people. It has NOTHING to do with these civilizations. GOD people....get an education!
babette616 2 years ago 49
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@babette616
Before accusing me of illiteracy, read what I saild properly. I was just commenting on the geographical structure of the two
Continents and made no reference what-
soever about about history or civiliazations
whatsover. Its you who need an education
saif316 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@saif316, you mean babette 16 had a lack of attention just then ; )
giselecarioca 1 year ago
@giselecarioca True, and I think babette616 has attention deficit disorder (serious Case)
saif316 1 year ago
@saif316 The point is you maybe right you maybe wrong. Who is to say you have not said the truth? Carbon dating might not be entirely accurate. let alone our education on history To civilisation. We follow scholars- the y are human beings.- they did not live in that period. Maybe they are totally way off point in all the investigations and conclusions.
shinjide213 1 year ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@babette616
WOW you are such an elitist prick... in fact with the "get an education" comment, it shows us that you have learned very little yourself, and it is highly offensive and quite ignorant and arrogant of you..take a sociology class why dont you... because this information isn't available to everyone..oh .... I bet you also like to correct grammar? don't bother..
DemeterLovesPumpkins 9 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@babette616 foh well thats what they tell you in school no wonder your so ignorant smh
HortonGourcuff 6 months ago
yeah that idiot can say 200 million years ago but the flood happened about 10,000 years ago and who is to say that wasn't a pole shift and caused the land masses to split up
KnightedAngel 2 years ago
@KnightedAngel That would have been millions of years before this.
marvinbroc 6 months ago
we currently have more than one written language yet we share the same technological information....couldnt ancient civilizations do the same? no i guess not right cause we are so unique (sarcasm inserted here)
hez1919 2 years ago
@hez1919 we have written language and technology that allows for nearly instant sharing of that information. The world is a {figuratively} much smaller place now than when it took weeks to travel a small distance.
You can't compare the sharing of information in the present day of the Web and planes and cars (not to mention that we also venture into space) with the ancient civilizations and their methods of travel and communication.
That's a groundless and ridiculous comparison.
babette616 2 years ago 25
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@babette616 what is ridiculous is your grasp of history and knowledge on this subject...the ancient myths say people came in boats without paddles or sails suggesting the civ. of 10,500 bc had technology....now on to the languages again....so you seem to think that lets say just 1000 years ago when it took months to cross a continent that there were no shared languages on earth?????...ancient civ pre 10,500 bc likely went to space as well since carvings and pics show space suits .
hez1919 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@hez1919 keep an open mind when thinking about these ancient civilizations...egyptologists have gotten everything wrong and still deny sphinx was built before the egyptian civilization...geologists know when it was exposed to rain yet no rain in egypt when the egyptians ruled so how did sphinx get water damage? see what i mean? even experts get it wrong...salso there are primitive and advanced human civilizations on earth RIGHT NOW dummy and if the world got smoked we would show them the way
hez1919 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@hez1919 just like some ancient vcivilizationo did for us after the last great cataclysm which caused the water to rise 400 ft (and gave birth to noah's arc story) wolly mammoths have been found frozen in ice with food in thier mouth...how fast of a world disaster happened for something that big to be frozen where it stands....watch more and lern more about all the stories and forget about what they tell you to think and think for yourself...
hez1919 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@hez1919 and if you want final proof that there was an advanced civilzation pre 10,500 bc then look at the temple they found off the coast of japan that is UNDER WATER....making it 100% obviously built before the water levels rose....the last time the water was that low was pre 10,500 bc....the proof is out there we are just too stupid to see it....remember how many people died because the world was round...its not such a crime to think there was an advanced civ like us before....
hez1919 1 year ago
@hez1919...the majority of scientists say the Yonaguni Monument is a natural rock formation. There is no proof. All of you new age folks don't get it. We don't have closed minds. We just want proof! An yet there is no definitive proof. It's not a crime to think there was advanced civ, but talking like you certain without evidence is ridiculous. Just because you want it to be true, doesn't make it true. If you were a trained historian, you'd understand that.
scott797 1 year ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@scott797 ok no problem would you like proof there were people here on earth advanced before the 3 great floods? in malta there are cliff caves the people live in and 80 feet under the water there are more caves that are carved the exact same way...the last time thos caves were above water was pre 8000 bc...also the japanese ancients used to use natural rock formations and add thier own carvings..kind of like north american natives...they wanted to be part of nature
hez1919 1 year ago
@hez1919..I asked for proof, not information about rock formations and the malta caves, neither of which can be dated accurately. And most would date those to no more than 3,000 thousands years ago. Are there any inscriptions? pottery? anything that would indicate this advanced civilization you claim existed. I know, you'll say I'm ignoring facts. But i see no facts, just crazy ideas based off of hollywood movies.
scott797 1 year ago 5
@scott797 you are ignoring facts...those caves in malta...there are some UNDER WATER...the last time that land was above water level was before 8000 bc when historians say there was no human civilisation...so who carved the caves that are under the water then?
hez1919 1 year ago
@hez1919..I don't understand..are you saying there are carvings on walls in underground caves, or that there are caves underwater? Because that's not unusual..unless you can prove they were made by tools...any why would such advanced people live in caves anyway? Early man did but they were not part of any advanced civ.
scott797 1 year ago
@scott797 the caves are carved out to be more habitable like the ones still on the surface....not a natural erosive thing...malta historians even admit that people used to live in those very caves on land...and the exact same caves are underwater
hez1919 1 year ago
@hez1919 oh, ok I get ya. Sorry we have a miss communication... so you're saying 8,000 b.c. there were men living in caves? But, herz, we have fossil remains of early man dating back millions of years. The latest before 10, 000 years ago. These primitive people often lived in caves. It doesn't indicate an advanced civilization. If they found a ray gun in one of those caves, then we're talking..lol..:)
scott797 1 year ago
@scott797 so if they were dug by treasure seekers. how come there is no holes leading to the chambers? why does the sonar show objects in the chambers? im just curious where you evidence is that it was dug by treasure hunters. Cuz thats never been said till you. Also if it was already dug up, than Egypt would keep it open as they have with most of their digs. Its their Linege and their History. No reason for them to hide any of it.
JCeiver612 1 year ago
@JCeiver612...I read it in a book by Zahi Hawass, I believe it was called "The Secrets of the Sphinx: Restoration Past and Present"...there is a video on youtube called "Drilling under the Sphinx" where Hawass and Lehrner both explain what's under the sphinx. You should check it out. They're respected scholars on Egyptian history. There are no chambers, I'm sorry..:(
scott797 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@scott797 if you send me one more baseless reply asking for some forms of proof which i have given i will block you...im not interested in arguing with someone who has a closed mind and cannot even acknowledge that there are other possibilities than those they believe to be true
hez1919 1 year ago
@hez1919 ..lol..calm down...I have no problem discussing these issues, rationally and calmly. But block me if you wish...lol
scott797 1 year ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@scott797 you arent discussing these issues...you are just saying that what anyone believes other than what you believe is wrong(not even you since you say experts say its natural) ....you are the fucking reason humanity suffers because you cannot think outside a box that someone else put you into
hez1919 1 year ago
@hez1919 Thinking out of the box is fine, but if you don't have sufficient proof for your theories than it's just talk. You say there were advanced civilizations. I say prove it, you can't. I can't prove they didn't exist either. So we're left with the question, what is more probable? That these advanced civs existed and left no obvious evidence of their existence or that they never existed at all? and Herz, there's no need to insult me or blame me for societies ills...lol..this isn't personal.
scott797 1 year ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@scott797 also i am agnostic...i dont have the answers and neither do you or anyone else...this is a process where we (humans) figure stuff out ...what you believe COULD be right...what i believe COULD be right.
hez1919 1 year ago
@hez1919 what we do is use the evidence we have and decide what is more probable. And what you're claiming isn't probable with what we actually know. All you need to do is look at fossil remains of ancient man, the latest which date to 10,000 years ago. look up the "Minatogawa Man" and the "Hobbit" remains. These are the advanced humans you speak of, AND this is evidence, ACTUAL remains of early man, found often with simple stone tools. What you offer is wild speculation, not proof.
scott797 1 year ago 4
holes in the ground that i could build..lead to building the great pyramid..the guy is on drugs like saying well done you dug yr grave now go build the empire state ! Can you honestly take germans seriously ?
klnine 2 years ago
Thank you so much for sharing! :)
sweetlightsoul 2 years ago
No Problem.............thanks for watching
saif316 2 years ago
to move 1 ton to about 100 people to 800 tons we need about 8000 people. How is it possible to put 8000 people or more around that stone ??????
stolax 2 years ago
what other invisible information could we produce by thoroughly examining these visible monuments (undeniable and unhidable by any government.note:many times the only information the masses have to go by is public, publicly funded sometimes skepticized groups and their opinions)
rthunter48 2 years ago
my question...?
using modern technology what can we decipher about these "primative pyramids" (npi =)
modern technology shows ten thousand years ago the "great pyramid" in egypt lines up with a constellation and the spynx which points directly to the east at the same time pointed towards the consellation leo?
and how does the great pyramid fall on an invisible equatorial line.
rthunter48 2 years ago
69k views!!!
my favourite number :P
shakyl008 2 years ago 3
i'd always prefer to see the indigenous comment on their history not descendants of those that destroyed it
jabdi 2 years ago 3
What we dont know,
is a lot!
Keep an open mind
Bobby...
palonejr 2 years ago 3
Still, there's alot of things we DO know. And it makes more sense to start in THAT end rather than in the other end ;) This is something people tend to forget, thinking about God etc. It makes more sense that he doesn't exist rather than him existing. Taking what we DO know in concideration.
MrKennyBones 2 years ago 2
@MrKennyBones
Read Polar Shift written by Clive Cussler and then we'll talk.
crawhip7 2 years ago
Even if no Atlantis were found or proven it doesnt mean that there are no great civilization that appeared in several thousand years ago
CHRIS1974100 2 years ago 4
@CHRIS1974100 There are is already an 11.500 year old civilization. Gobekli Tepe in Turkey oldest temples in the World yet discovered but there are probably other lost civilzations laying undiscovered around the world some sites are already known but have been improperly dated.
ScarletLoco77 2 years ago
There was a dome in mexico as old as the pyramids the dome is next to piramids of the city chichen itza. so the guy who said i this video that ancient ciilizations couldnt build domes isnt entirely true
sickbasterd123 2 years ago 3
Well this is a very one sided documentary, there not really connecting the dots, these academic types fail to see the important resonance. If it was a gradual progression then with today's technology why can't the great pyramid be replicated?? Cos there is not a crane in existence big enough or any device to lift monolith blocks to such heights. Not forgetting the geometric and earth precision, Yep Egyptian slave labor that LOL
obione888 2 years ago 22
Those things that you said, and also the matter of how on Earth the Egyptians knew to orient the Pyramids to true North. One thing that no Egyptian of that time would have any knowledge for.
ImperatorDerGalaxis 2 years ago
LMFAO! Are you F'ing serious? Have you not seen the enormous cranes that build skyscrappers? Those blocks weigh a few tons - these cranes can lift 100+ tons at a time.
If you want to talk about precision, look at the new huge building in Dubai.
Philldapill85 2 years ago 3
yeah but the biggest pyramid is 13 acres at the base and 50 thousand and some feet tall no crane could reach the middle of that from the base to stack those blocks like that think with your head dumbass
Sykoangelo 2 years ago
WHAT? There is a pyramid that is nearly 10 miles high(50,000 feet like you said)???
Where is this pyramid? Tell us more of this magical structure that even modern civilization couldn't build.
Philldapill85 2 years ago 3
@Philldapill85 lol...there is no pyramid that's 50,000 feet tall...:)...The pyramids at giza are barely 500 ft.
scott797 1 year ago
the blocks in baalbek weigh 200 - 800 tons each. how did they lift those thousands of years ago?
thirstyuk 2 years ago
@thirstyuk haha because they are bangladesh workers pun intended) ahahaha.....
itcw 1 year ago
@obione888 there are modern cranes that can lift over 50 tons hundreds of feet in the air. Crawler cranes can lift over 500 tons!..Most of the blocks in the pyramids are 20-60 tons. To claim we can build skycrapers that have elevators, electrcity and windows etc..lol...but can't build the pyramids is ridiculous. Why would we want to? they're primitive structures. They're blocks of stone! If they were so advanced why couldn't they put some windows in that shit, maybe some air-conditioning?..lol..
scott797 1 year ago
@obione888
i agree, but alternatively, it would have wasted too much time just to re-create one and noone has that monetary captial to do it? It doesn't prove anything to create it by the way, so archaelogist only re-create using models.
itcw 1 year ago
@obione888 dont you find it funny how scientists today actually state that the pyramids cannot be replicated as we are not technologically advanced enough to get them perfectly aligned as they are but yet people still believe their stupid text books which tell them SLAVES built the pyramids? umm all i have to say is GET A FKN CLUE YOU IDIOT PEOPLE! YOU HAVE CONTRADICTING INFORMATION IN YOUR FACE ON A DAILY BASIS BUT YET YOU CHOSE TO IGNORE IT! wake upppppppppp aghhhhhh
medusazee 1 year ago
@obione888
THAT is evidence of possible lost knowledge, not of a lost civilization.
Fetchdafish 1 year ago
@obione888 The business with no crane being able to lift the rocks involved is an utter non-sequitur, considering that no one believes the rocks were ever lifted, but were instead pushed onto ramps and quarried on site. Also, the pyramids were constructed by paid day laborers, not slaves.
CristinaFernandez 1 year ago
@obione888 u r so true and what about the fact that this was happing all over at about the same time ... i beleave that there time line is off away off and if its one sided then no real science can be done srry but they need to step out side the box and stop saying the same thing that came befor them its like there reading the same book over and over
eric0u812 1 year ago
@obione888 It could be recreated today with what the Egyptians had; nobody's decadent enough to try it the traditional way. There's even a recently discovered spiral structure -inside- the pyramid unconnected to the rest of the chambers that was used as an interior ramp.
jumpmonkey03 1 year ago
To much war and other things made these people dissapear.
Millions and millions of people... now gone now we have rebuilt.
Dorisequador 2 years ago 3
Although this documentary asks/states interesting ideas; They have overlooked tons of things... What about the sphinx, baalbek, the temple mount, etc?
ApollyonProductions 2 years ago
unless of coures the atlantians tought each region how to fish for them selfs.make do with what they got
smashbeans 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
piramids are all over because it was a way for them to be closer to the sky, and they didn't knew how to build ladders.
aldebarankanon 2 years ago
love the way the use the hitchcock score in this film
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx502 2 years ago
Theres no douht that mordern archeology needs to uncover more of our past ,and with that said i dont believe(according to bits n pieces we'v gathered) that the Athenians wer around almost 11,000 to 12,000 years ago
GSCIGLIA 2 years ago
Wait a tic....1st let me say ,i dont believe Atlantis brought knowledge 2 da world, the only thing that i must dispute is I do remember reading and hearin on the Disc. channel that da Egyptions did in fact have some refrence to "Atlantis" ,wat might hav been misinturpeted was the amount of years past ,it wasent mayb 9000 years but 900 years prior to the Egyption records or refrence to a place we call "Atlantis"
GSCIGLIA 2 years ago
egyprians wrote about a civilization near them and called them keftou(cretans).
solon saw this inscriptions and took the story to athens were plato heard it and wrote it.
according to plato athenians were at war with atlanteans at 9600bc.
so they must be older
dimalex8 2 years ago
Comment removed
APAFARAAA 2 years ago
that women has the most annoying voice i ever heard it like actually sucks the blood underneath my nails when she would met me personally and said one word i would knock her teeth out and cut her toung of so no one would ever have hear that voice
mayn still irritated over it
hetisdu040 2 years ago
a voice that could peel paint? my mom has that.. when she yells my hearing fades. i guess it's damage from childhood, i can't hear those tones anymore.. heh heh he
kaker69 2 years ago
thank you for this
fascinating
shifts horizons ...
expands the mind ...
you are great ...
nightrainbows1111 2 years ago
We are staring at Giza pyramids for 3000 years (may be for even 10000 years), but we are still have no clue why they were built. How unbelievable is that???
ComancheChiefSD 2 years ago 4
Concrete thing are always easier to understand than abstract thing. Meaning.... the reason to understand someone else is work is not more important than their results. Imagine if eistein had decide to be a stand up comedy host rather than a physicist.
JOWEYPR 2 years ago
Imagine what Einstein would be saying today. He ended up saying his own General Relativity didn't give the answers he was looking for. I'm pretty sure that he would not be as popular if he lived during our times. Btw, Velikovsky predicted Jupiter's magnetic field and few other bits before they were confirmed.
verlanis 2 years ago
Hypothesize that some do know how they were built. Chances are they are withholding knowledge for their own selfish agenda's, or simply fear mass hysteria if sharing the truth. Either way they are trying control knowledge pertaining to some being (human or not) far more intelligent than themselves. Whoever built them were far more advanced than these info packrats then, and today. Think about the descendants of the builder's level of intelligence today, 1000's of years later. Peace.
iempoor 2 years ago
Keep in mind, all these archeological expeditions are expensive and someone is sponsoring them. So, these sponsors and archeologists themselves want to see results. The best result is discovery, sensation. Just like all of us, these people want to get bonus, promoted to museum director and secure their retirement. I can see them manipulating truth, fabricating evidence and misleading people all the time. And, naïve us believe them.
ComancheChiefSD 2 years ago
im kinda curious why arent they looking underwater its not on the desert
lashleyfanlesley 2 years ago 4
they are trying to see if some of the atlantians got away from the flood and went around teaching other primitive people things such as farming and building certain things such as pyramids.
iamflex626 2 years ago
no doubt..we know more about outter space than our own oceans
UFODemons 2 years ago 11
This has been flagged as spam show
we know nothing!
ComancheChiefSD 2 years ago
@UFODemons
damn true, like the guy who had mentioned in the "the true story of philidelphia experiment"...
itcw 1 year ago
if you let a little kid play with blocks, he sees realy fast that if you stack the blocks in a pyramid shape, they don't fall over
electrictreaser 2 years ago 6
I think the same. It is basic shape it doesn't take a genious to figure that out.
GrafRamolo 2 years ago
allenpineda,
Instead of sending money, we should send a U-Haul and tell people to move to where the food is!!!! I hear this shit about people walking for days at a time to get water, MOVE CLOSER TO THE DAMN RIVER!!!!!
Muncewedo32 2 years ago
Lol now that;s science!
JOWEYPR 2 years ago
ATLANTIS ISNT REAL
LMFAO
LOOK OUT
sassyyassy23 2 years ago
allanpineda, there will always be people starving in the world, no matter what the others are doing with their money, that does not mean that money should not be invested in science.
RRRAAALLLUUUCCCAAA 2 years ago
Maybe not, Cal Tech, MIT and Moscow have successfully converted light from a lazer into carbon. Think Star Trek Replicators. It took enough energy to power LA for a day and they only got a tiny spot of carbon, but in 50 years famine could be a bad memory
UMTAPIR101 2 years ago
sure.. civilization is inebitable as eventually all will form into one.. but would the church or those muslims ever have a space program?, or goto the moon?.. no..so they aren't civilized.
kaker69 2 years ago
I accidentally gave a thumbs up. SOME who are influenced by their faith and belief sets are influenced by them in more positive senses. Let us not be so harsh making a blanket statement about "them" not being civilized. At the core of it all, faiths of all sorts teach principles to live by. Just in their own words, stories, writings, etc..... All the same stuff, just said in a different fashion.
iempoor 2 years ago
what about the whole killing thing? Like the sarcfice? every culture has UPS and DOWNS
RobotMice 2 years ago
Killing in the name of... Sacrifice in the name of ... Sacrifice oneself to become a martyr. Yes, exactly. Ups and downs for sure, but to define a group of people as uncivilizied because of such practices is very narrow minded. People who are so devoted to their faith do not see such things as uncivilized. In fact, not going the whole 9 yards in such a way was likely viewed as uncivilized. Let's try to keep in mind that other people's perceptions can be different than yours.
iempoor 2 years ago
Very well put!
ledinghat 2 years ago
Can you prove any of them wrong?
Can you prove 'all' of them wrong?
I posit the notion that there is 'one'
that you wouldn't even be able to
appear to be able to prove wrong.
Which one do 'you'(not some so
called scientist) think that is?
olympicsnow 2 years ago
ok, how about comments about adults with imaginary friends.. i should change my argument to reflect my hatred towards the human condition and human nature and why the social animal needs the bible stories to train themselves on how to treat others.. but then i might sound like someone who was misguided into hating the jews when in fact the entire human race is a pedantic cluster fuck of the meek
kaker69 2 years ago 6
i'm sure that the fact sand also falls and piles itself on a 45 degree angle, like the perymids had something to do with the reason they were made
kaker69 2 years ago
the pyramids are energy capacitors...they hold earth's energy...look up quantum pphysics to understand that.. the pyramids interact with our thoughts... our thoughts have frequencies..
Ceaza29 3 years ago
the pyramid is a logical conclusion from the desire to build a tall structure. Mountains are cone or pyramid shaped, tall hills are usually in a cone or pyramid shape, ancient humans actually had a brain, believe it or not, and they observed the structure of tall formations of hills or mountains, and copied it in a neat structure called a pyramid. Whoever thinks that its somehow unlikely are retarded. People love the idea of religion and propagate nones sense.
conman2317 3 years ago
why we have to argue about this theres too much hungry people that need youre help instead of putting youre money with this kind of shit
allanpineda 3 years ago
We need more people like you, allanpineda. These idiots are blowing their money on this shit.
TrueBlueAstrax 3 years ago
I don't understand y they left off the Olmec people from what I know they pre-date the maya. There's a place in Guatemala called Monte alto were sum sculpture's,pottery n temple's n have been carbon dated(1800-2500bc)oldest known "civilized" people in mesoamerica, sure they were pre-Olmec people(hunter's n gathrer's)but did not leave monument's or pottery to carbon date only clovis point(12,000bc) spears. Great vid but does not give the same info like national geographic or archiology today.
asianthor 3 years ago
Everybody has a need to know what exactly happened, OK. Do you realize that we are all the descendants of the survivors of those great civilizations? That a huge cataclism covered everything and that only a few people were left alive to start from scratch? None of those survivors could salvage a thing. How can one construct a great building with bare hands? The first survivors died and then their children, so there was no one left with the knowledge of how those constructions were built.
beltor333 3 years ago
genes and dna are carriers of information right??
maybe they thought bout triangles or wanted to build mountains that showed their gods or theyre dead pharaos the way to some stars they should go ...well i dont know but it is mysterious and kewl ^^
TimesHaveChanneled 3 years ago
there's a reason why there's so many holes in history.. there's alot thats been lost and purposely forgotten.. Thats why most africans dont have too much knowledge of there history. Just like the shattered noses of the egyptian sculptures were an attempt to take credit themselves or discredit the true inhabitants. I refuse to listen to most archeologists, there is a term called 'scientific racism' its using your league and position to propose obsolete and ideas that are entirely opinions.
tigrisx23 3 years ago
like how the sphinx has water damage bu the leading Egyptian archeologist's. Abdu Swhai or w/e his name is on history channel says it was from the wind? Water damage would prove the sphinx is over 12,000 years old. which would date way before any other civilization. Also They wont let anyone go into the chamber under the left paw of the sphinx because they dont want to damage the door. but they used explosives to open the pyramids...
JCeiver612 3 years ago
thats interesting I've heard something about that, but what I here from one source or, book, or TV network, its always some misinformation, and contradicts something else I've heard.. It's too bad we all don't have access and an go ourselves and get primary account of what other people have proposed to us.
tigrisx23 3 years ago
@JCeiver612 His name is Zahi Hawass, and there is no chamber under the left paw. There is a tunnel under the tail section and on its back..Both lead to nothing. It's assumed they were dug by treasure seekers. They've drilled under the Sphinx, there's nothing there, sorry..:( If you can find a reputable source to prove me wrong, I'd love to hear it. I've taught ancient history for many years, love when people prove me wrong. Good luck!
scott797 1 year ago
@JCeiver612 His name is Zahi Hawass, and there is no chamber under the left paw. There is a tunnel under the tail section and on its back..Both lead to nothing. It's assumed they were dug by treasure seekers. They've drilled under the Sphinx, there's nothing there, sorry..:( If you can find a reputable source to prove me wrong, I'd love to hear it. I've taught ancient history for many years, love when people prove me wrong. Good luck!
scott797 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JCeiver612 His name is Zahi Hawass, and there is no chamber under the left paw. There is a tunnel under the tail section and on its back..Both lead to nothing. It's assumed they were dug by treasure seekers. They've drilled under the Sphinx, there's nothing there, sorry..:( If you can find a reputable source to prove me wrong, I'd love to hear it. I've taught ancient history for many years, love when people prove me wrong. Good luck!
scott797 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hey are there any Pyramids in Northern Europe? Oh that's right those monkies couldn't build shit other than stacked stones.
Eagle971 3 years ago
at 5:32 it looks like the guy is digging up an old beydish........ the arena beybladers call
THEBOY53 3 years ago