MR cambel if everything is your belief and you cant proof it like Dr.zakir then you must sit at home with your ideas why are you here in front of such great scholer
hey is that Jamal Badawi sitting next to Zakir Naik ? 3:40 . omg i think thats Jamal Badawi what is he doing there, what they are forming a club ? 5:09 omg thats jamal badawi
where was the evolution before the big bang?? why don't we change to better living things if humans existed thousands years ago?? have the evolution stopped ?? how and why??
@vandera7mad to answer your first question evolution has nothing to do with big bang theory. Secondly, there is micro-evolution that is occurring. evolution is a continuous process.
i don't think it's a conspiracy coz if you lip-read,you'll come to know there's nothing special in it(i'm not talking about this particular videos though but noticed it in previous ones)
~"The secret of creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. This is what Dr.Zakir Does - Hide and Manipulate Sources"~
Dr.Zakir Naik is on a mission to Islamise all religions. He seems to follow the footsteps of Muhammad who encouraged lying to deceive enemies. Dr.Zakir Naik needs to increase his IMAN by reading the Qur'an and believing in its sanctity rather than lying and spreading gossips about other religions' scriptures.
We can easily infer that Muhammad is no match to Gautama Buddha.
Dr William Cambell knows his lost this debate, Dr Zakir Naik he answers the question in full, Cambell only gives a breif answer and hardly answers the question. Which clearly proves ISLAM IS THE TRUE RELIGION OF HUMANITY. SubhanAllah
"Dr.cambell if can't answer the contradiction in genesis regarding the creation don't u think that proves that the bible is unscientific therefore not from God?" 04:20 AND HE ANSWER THE QUESTION CHEAPLY..and the said "I know that doesn't answer ur qstion,but my faith is in christ for my savior"...WHAT KIND OF ANSWER IS THAT...!!!! HAHAHA....you living in a dream man.
that Mr Samuel 'no man' keeps on stopping Dr zakir naik way before he's times run out. its obvious he thinks dr naik has won the debate, Alhadulillah, but he cant stand it.
why the X tian Moderator always deliberately prevents the speaker to complete the answer?so manipulated the event may ALLAH send that man a complete "Wrath"on his life here and after.
Come on ppl, Lets nt put down the christians. Allah, Muhammad(S.A.W) , jesus and Islam is nt for us muslims alone. Of course they will feel insecure. Put us in their shoes. We'll be angry and frustrated rite? We are human beings with egos.
Give them time. Show them the rite path. Invite them to Allah's way. Remember, we are brothers and sisters who are unfortunately born in families with different religious beliefs.
O people! Surely there has come to you manifest proof from your lord and we have sent to you clear light.
175- Then as for those who believe in Allah and hold fast by him, he will cause them to enter into his mercy and grace and guide them to himself on a right path.
Do they not then meditate on the quran? And if it were from any other then Allah, they would have found in it many a discrepancy.
Quran:
(Surah-4-the women-vs-105)
Surely we have revealed the book to you with the truth that you may judge between people by means of that which Allah has taught you; and be not an advocate on behalf of the treacherous.
106- And ask forgiveness of Allah; surely Allah is forgiving,
Somtimes I've got this feelin that dr. zakir is the imam Mahdi.... He has full knowledge about islam and many things....Mannn he's just tooooooo goooooddd...
@kurdishleader damn right AMERICAN Christian's are worth creature on earth even kafir will forgive by Allah if God Wants but not for Mushrik No chance
why they stoping my brother dr. naik, before his time... DAMN... they so scared, so they should stay home...... and dr. cambell, your like a puppet.....just keep repeating everything, mabye, or eventually you will have your own words..
@321godson I HAVE FOUND A VERSE THAT CONTRADICTS THE TORAH AND QUR'AN....................THAT VERSE IS..............................The LORD says to my Lord: "Sit at My right hand, until I make Thine enemies a footstool for Thy feet." (Psalm 110:1)..................THIS PROVES THAT GOD HAS A DIVINITY AND THAT JESUS MUST BE THE SON OF GOD WHO IS TALKING TO THE FATHER "the LORD says to my lord" .......WHAT DOES THAT MEAN!!!!!!
what was the name of the lord before qurn existed???? what books were there about lord before Quran. Quran has come after jesus during Mohammed period i guess.
i believe everybody used to believe in Torah. even quran says to believ in torah.
jesus indirectly said that he is god: John 8:58 "I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am. "
in john.10:33 jews were giving witness: jews were talking to jesus "and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God.” -it is clear that jesus is god
as muslims we have to be fair, and u cant deny its kind of messed up how they let him answer the question on evolution but didnt let william answer the question on jesus pbuh.
1000 of fools accepting what ever he says...... i will prove. zakhir naik gave a stupid ridiculous explanation about reflection and lamp. He said that Lamp reflects the light and god is light he himself existed in him as lamp and he reflects the light. what is ths???? light is different nd lamp is different. lamp is combination of bulb(light) and reflector. they are two objects. he has to accept trinity. light (bulb) is lord, reflector is jesus and reflected light is holy spirit.
brother , thats not what he said , look at the verse. please don't twist the words around , because its what is in the quran look at the verse. i believe it said it was a light and ALSO..then it mentioned the lamp. look at the verse/ video again :)
hey i have given comment to wrong video i think. i dont remember that was wich part of the video. One kid who was wearing spects gets up and asks about the refraction of light regarding the god. refer that.
@09sudhir09 and after death? You accept the first law of thermodynamics - Conservation of Energy with the only standhold that it hasn't been proven wrong, yet you do not acknowledge the Quraan with hasn't been proven wrong either.. No where in the Quraan it says to go to war, in fact it's the opposite, it is a sign of peace.. please dont speak without any knowledge
I can't believe the christians have this guy representing the bible....what a numb nuts....get someone with more of a back bone...wow.....but my opinion is its all the same bull shit....same theme....
the mediaotor knows whats up they r looking like fools min by min. an still christians are blind. i bet 90% of the christians in that building convert after this debate
@actedit i agree with you... he's( Dr. Cambell ) not answering any question... and the mods always cut when its reach 3.5min... that was sooooooooo anoyying...Dr. Cambell only mumbling about nothing related to the question... in every debate i havent see any Christian believer can answer correctly... according to the questioner question... I also believe 30-50% Christian believer convert to Islam...
zakir naik last time announced to debate with anybody who brings 10000 people audience from his side. i think yu (who are barking) just try for it and let god almighty give yu the chance.
i feel a little sorry for dr cambell he knows the truth islam is the truth he just doesnt want to admit it. he mite have been raised a christian but he should still look into islam
dr cambell would make a great muslim inshallah Allah will guide him.
@:Booiggers : its true that the "Quran" is not a book of science.. As Dr. Zakir had mentioned earlier that Quran is a book of "signs" not " science "..
Dr ZaKir cannot explain how a virgin birth is possible scientifically..which is in both the bible and as well as the Quran..It is true that Bible is not a science book..so is Quran.
@booiggers : its true that the "Quran" is not a book of science.. As Dr. Zakir had mentioned earlier that Quran is a book of "signs" not " science "..
none can explain scientifically the virgin birth, u know why ? cos it's a great miracle that support Jesus and Mary before Jews , and even all those miracles some of jews still reject him as a prophet. so u can imagine if jesus was born normally not miraculously what will be their reaction, surely they will kill him as they did with other prophets before jesus peace be upon him
@qigong11..I know why a virgin birth cannot be scientifically explained..but it is not new to humanity. Krishna was born of the virgin Devaka. Horus was
born of the virgin Isis. Mercury was born of the virgin Maia. Romulus
was born of the virgin Rhea Sylvia. For some reason, many religions
force themselves to think of the birth canal as a one-way street. Besides Jesus was indeed killed..and the miraculous birth was written long after he was gone.
@booiggers indeed the virgin birth cant be proven through science, but never the less if God decided this was the way for him to be known through the second person of the triune God, and to bring salvation unto mankind, then it would be the only plausable method to not equate sin to him as every is born with the tendacy of sinning
then i believe God has that ordained right, to save his creation
@booiggers krishna was born of a virgin, from what i have read on this she was not a virgin but had other children before , but this just what i read,
horis born of virgin isis and so forth is a later adaption from after the tim of Jesus, but this is not even like Jesus, as he was born like a man and this horis was some mythical creature and human
but his virgin birth of jesus being written after he was gone, even though the documents were written after he was gone, there is still the prophecies concerning him in the old testament... which were fulfilled in the new testament, and we have good eye witness of this account in the bible too, and outside it
@followerofjesus1984..The myth of horus(not to mention he cured the blind..crucified and ressurected & had 12 disciples) was written in 300 BC, long before jesus was supposed to be born..besides if you are concerned about fulfilling the OT prophecies..Virgin birth..contradicts Romans 1:3 "The Messiah must be a physical descendant of David (Rom. 1:3, Acts 2:30) " which disapproves that prophecy since he can only be a physical descendant if he was born of joseph and not a miraculous virgin birth.
@booiggers where is the proof of his death and resurection, if anything this is a later addition as i have never found anything earier than hundred yrs after jesus
he was supposidly born to a godess , and this nothing like christianity
as for the twelve disciple , plz give me the info regarding this, as with out these things its not the same
@followerofjesus1984 Its funny when a christian asks for a proof..when there is no historical proof of the miracles nor the resurrection of jesus christ.."Gerald Massey (Ancient Egypt, the Light of the World): "Pistis Sophia, in agreement with the Book of Hades shows how the twelve as followers of Horus were constituted as a company that consisted at first of seven to which the five were added in forming the group of twelve." and not to mention the sacred no12 is used it many other religions too
@booiggers now ur stretch a lil aint u, if anything the bible counts as a source in its self, then u have outside documentation about the death and resurrection of Christ like tasitus, and so forth, there are plenty of them my friend just do the study rself
the twelve disciple of hous is not a fact , as there is no info on them,
@followerofjesus1984 Bible is not a historical source..examples:- A talking ASS (NUMBERS 22:27-28)..and talking snakes..4 footed birds (LEVITICUS 11:20)..7 headed leopards REVELATION 13:1-2..never existed in the history of time..the other sources which you claim like..Tacitus..who was born in 56 AD when "Chrestianity" existed at that time..how can his words through "hearsay" can be taken as credible historical proof...why dont you read the book of hades..to find about horus's 12 disciples!
@booiggers a talking ass ----------- obviously u need to read it again cause God was projecting his voice through the ass, a donkey
a talking snake, this was the form of satan in the time period, i know this is hard to believe but its the way he choose to to do, but its not these thing i am refering to but the more major thing people, place and so forth
@followerofjesus1984 God was projecting his voice through an ass..why dont we see such talking donkey these days...we would have nothing to argue about..lol
come on now the seven headed leopard in releation is not an actual creature its a abstract way of detail kingdom that would rule the earth or a place at a certain time
how can ur words be trusted, being two thousand years later, so i will go with the early historian and the early sources we have about the life of jesus
@booiggers even if he had twelve disciples this has no real relievence to my faith, its just another interesting but non reliable fact that u want to throw out
there were more than twelve disiples after jesus left,
@followerofjesus1984 when I read a religious book which is full of myths and fables & some historical records..I compare it with other myths which existed at that time..most of what is in the bible is from sumerian mythology..the noah story is from epic of Gilgamesh..I know historically it has no reference..my beliefs are based on facts which is based on evidence..but no matter how many errors are found in the bible it is rationalized,or attributed to translational errors & metaphors. Its sad!
@booiggers thats the thing ur already in the mind that something is a myth, or is being copied, so here is the question, if there is no God , like i assume u believe, then u think all things came from nothing, and some hpw chaos created something as beautiful and complex as the univers and solor systems, n all the galaxies.
ok since u base ur beliefs on fact as u claim, what are ur beliefs
“I don’t know yet” is a valid scientific answer. Science is an attempt to understand what we do know, and slowly attain knowledge that will help us understand what we do not know. Until we get that evidence, “we don’t know yet” is acceptable..but you believers claim to know everything..without any evidence..just because it was written in an ancient book..
@booiggers no, fact is u have it wrong i dont claim to know everything, but sciece in its self is a adaptive process and can not always be a solid definitive approach
and to accept the big bang theory as our existance is some where in the unbelieveable range, cause to do so mean that we have no purpose and that we are basically an accident
@followerofjesus1984 A temporary lack of scientific evidence doesnt mean the possible answer is god. Ants only live for 90 days..dont you think it has a purpose to live for those 90 days..or does it have to believe in "after life" heaven and hell..in order to survive.
@booiggers no, i never said that i was pointing out that the lack of evidence actually means their theory is unprovable , ther for is a theory
but the idea that we are off cast of a big bang is just very unsubstanciated, even so the science feel we may have evolved from an ape or a micro organism, so what is it
we are not talking of ants even they have structure and complex system, as we do, and this is not something that came from nothing
@followerofjesus1984 Logically speaking..if everything must be created..then the creator must have a creator..if you agree that some powerful entity always existed and no one have to create it..then the same logic can be applied..to the universe..for no one had to create it..
this show that there is a creater, something powerful that can ceate some thing as complex as a human, all the cells to form a strcture, and give us different dna patterns, and so forth
to say there is no God is a little premature in ur think, how did we get to the place we are at
a building didnt just happen over night, and this has a complex structure that take a lot of precise presitioning to make what it is,
@followerofjesus1984 you are talking about intelligent design..how science approach anything is based on evidence..is there any evidence to prove the existence of god..no..talking about dna patterns..the bonobo apes and our ancestors share the same dna pattern..that is an evidence..however..man being made from mud..is unscientific..there were many scientist who were christians after several research found nothing that support the creationism.
@booiggers is there any proof the existance of God, apart from the universe, me and you , and other living creature, then u may have a point, but since we all have different d n a , look different, then i say that there is a God or a powerful being
science can not accountfor human life, its comes up with different theories every time,
im not dismissing science, im just saying that everything proves God,
@followerofjesus1984 The existence of various life forms with different dna doesnt equates to god..it equates to evolution..survival of the fittest! Science is humble enough to disapprove or approve a theory based on evidence..but no matter how many evidence anyone come up with.. to disapprove religious beliefs..it is ignored..im gonna end this discussion from my side..laterzz!!
"Facts do not cease to exist simply because they are ignored." Aldous Huxley
@booiggers well actually ur arguing from silence, simply cause dna just does spring from nothing ---- to have a comprehensive ystem like human body u need a far comprehenive being to create it,
and to say this all happen cause of the big bang is llike dancing on thin ice cause as i will make clear a comprehensive system need a designer as itcant come into being out of chaos
@booiggers whats sad is most of the so called error one can point is only limited understanding, so yet if we say some lil glitch is down to transalational reason then that is a likely course
or prehaps it down to a problem of not read to accounts to really understand what been said, or maybe its a verient reading
@booiggers who said about the miracles, i was on abou horis death and resurrection, as this was a later addition as i said he wasnt born of a virgin but had a father
@booiggers as for u trying to disprove the virgin birth by using the two passage about his heritage through david,
well Jesus has two natures one is man which is seen through the seed of david, and the other is his divine nature, and if God choose this as apart of the mean to provide salvation, who are we to judge
its not contradiction, its a contrasting statement, about his two natures, a contradiction would be if it said he wasnt born miraculosly and then said later he was
@followerofjesus1984 You are wrong again..theologically the human nature of jesus was from the human "mary" and the divine nature from "heavenly father"..either, he was born cause joseph impregnate mary or it was the holy spirt..it cannot be both..if he was born of joseph's sperm then the miraculous birth is false..if he was born miraculously then the didnt fulfill the prophecy of him being a physical descendant! Period.
@followerofjesus1984 how can it be of davids too..if joseph had nothing to do with the birth of jesus..now you are being irrational my friend! "The way to see by FAITH is to shut the eye of reason." Ben Franklin
@followerofjesus1984 show me a biblical verse..to assert this statement that mary was also a physical descendant of david..you disagree all the facts right before your eyes cause its against your beliefs..besides my original question was directed to a muslim..because muslim scholars who criticise bible for its mythological beliefs and quote it unscientific..while they believe in virgin births..its funny! when we dont see such miraculous birth or people walking on water these days.
@booiggers glad to hear from u again, i will in luke three : twenty three
what fac are refering too, mate as of yet haveno real facts just theory and at best very poor ones
u need to give omething more reliable cause ur words are not credible
sorry but as i said science is not a good way of prooving a religion, therefore i dont use it to prove it, but in a way God himself proves himself in a way that is own doing
@followerofjesus1984 =Luke 3:23 proves that mary was a physical descendant of david?.lets see "And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was [the son] of Heli," Heli is the father of joseph..not mary..and mathew contradicts it by said it was jacob..besides mathew comes up with 28 immediate descendants and luke comes up with 42..FROM DAVID TO JESUS..and none of the name matches..im sure many historians would find it contradictory..
@followerofjesus1984 Luke 3:23 says Jesus son of joseph- son of heli! and how you say heli is marys father..can you post the entire verse..where it says heli is the father of mary..now you are contradicting bible!
"To surrender to ignorance and call it God has always been premature, and it remains premature to this day." Isaac Asimov
@booiggers as i said luke is telling jesus through his mothers family, so that is why the names are different, heli is josoph father n law, and jesus grandfther through mary
i'm not contradictin, u just need to read both and see that one is through the mother, and one is through his step father, but i agree to some extent that i may cause problem , if u dont do any in depth studying
can i post a verse of heli being marys father, well going on what u say then joseph had two fathers,
@followerofjesus1984 I dont want to know what you feel about the verses or what it couldve been..the verses shows nothing about mary..or her being the daughter of heli..if so paste the verses here...lol im not saying joseph had two fathers..only your bible is claiming so..i dont want rationalize an obvious mistake..based on my own opinion or yours..show me the verses..or shushhhhh!
@booiggers well all i am saying for them both to be true, then one is surely linked through her to koseph as his fther in law, cause a man cant have to father can he..... i have heard so many different ways that these verses can be applied, some really good but not as logical as the way i fee and een the commontaries are on my side
i dont believe it is saying he had two fathers, i believe that cause one says father in linking and the other says son, one can be applied to the father in law
@followerofjesus1984 post the verses..and discuss..i really dont want to know what you believe..we are discussing about what is written..in the bible..lets stick to that..post the verse line by line and show me how you came to that conclusion..
and Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ
here the link says the father of ......
Joseph, the son of Heli
and here the link is son of
i admit that there is a whole lot of info there, but what do have is that a man supposedly has two father but one is not his biological father but his father in law , if it has to accounted for
@followerofjesus1984 Jacob is the father of Joseph..Joseph is the son of heli..what is the difference..father and father in law...arent the same.."The way to see by FAITH is to shut the eye of reason." Ben Franklin
@booiggers no ur missing the point, i said they werent the same person, i said one is his father and the other could be his father in law
but there is another possibility that it is the same person, as most people went by two different names, like matthew the tax collector, who was called levi
@followerofjesus1984 This is exactly what is called as "rationalizing" an error..oh they might have two names..or it couldve been the father in law..who cares.. luke comes up with 42 generations and mathew only 28..logicians and historians wont agree with you..some people go father to any extent to make them look irrational or even stupid..in order to defend their faith...Its sad..
@booiggers i agree that not all people wil agree upon the basis of the geneologies as they dont leave much room fortotal understanding, but that is not a bad thing that there is some different view on this subject, cause it sheds nw light on, but no matter how u look at it it is eith a ----- his father in one and father la in the other which is acceptable veiw or as i previously said not all people were known to have last names and instead use multiple names like matthew does
@booiggers which does make whole lots of sence, so its a plausable explination, considering one say father of, and the other say son of, that one may be through marriage
@booiggers irrational, hardly, im just sking for proof, u throw a claim with no evidence to back it up, such as the crucifixion and resurrection of horus, and u want me to believe something that simply has no solid evidence for it, so im not being irrational, im being logical and raional, so its more about u proove ur claim , otherwise its an unsubstanciated claim
@booiggers plus all reptiple source conclude that horis had a father, as his mother revived his dad and had sex with him, so no paralell, and the crucifixion was not known in his time either
come on man we are talking about mankind not some myths, Egyptian, Indian and Greek they are all mythical creatures created by satan to keep the mankind away from the right path
Zakir Naik gets butchered by ali sina of faithfreedom (dot)org.Every single thing he said has been demolished beyond the slightest ability to refute.May you be blessed Ali Sina.
And this zakir dude never got the guts to debate with ali sina despite Ali challenging zakir.
Ali is the founder of faithfreedom(dot)org .Vist that site for the truth.
Non believers will try endless in attempt to find mistakes in the Quran but one thing they fail to realize is that no matter how many people get together and do MOT Test on Quran, the Quran will NEVER require service, Its message is established for life. It is also an open challenge from Allah (swt)
People will translate at all levels to mislead those who seek knowledge but it only requires common sense to understand why this is being done. For proper knowledge read AUTHENTIC sources only
@diurnalusman i notice that, but maybe it cos he is a a cross road, to let science determine what he can cant do, or what he has done, how he done , science should never be a way of proving religion as its form changes so often, and God doesn't, he remains the same, and can not and should not be decifered through science for god created science and all of it ways by creating us to interpret it
@followerofjesus1984 i think zakir naik awnsered your statement when he said that you should not prove religion with scientifical THEORIES since they make U turns all the time(i.e evolution theory) BUT you should try to prove religion with scientifical facts since they are facts and unchancheble(i.e the moon and sun have its own orbits) so that is what zakir naik has proven that the bible goes against established scientifical facts while the Quran gives you scientifical facts 1400 years ago
@followerofjesus1984 my God have you not watched the entire debate ? zakir naik gives 100s of scientific errors .. 1.Book of Leviticus ch 14 : V49-53 (that you can disinfect a house from lepracy by sprinkling birdblood on it)-->goes against science
2.1verse earth is flat 2. it is circel -->both are scientificaly incorrect
3.bible says all plants are eatable-->wrong goes against science
4.bible says humans are created by churred cheese and milk -->copied from hypocrates wrong
1 ---- was ritual that was applied in those times, whih is in line and keeping with the whole redemptive work of Christs redemptive work, but there is no mention in those verse what it is to be aided to, so leprosy is a wild guess and this no longer applies to this day
3 ----- the bible say that all plants are edable, until i know the exact verse this remain known to it true content, but i think its in genesis one
which all it say is let there be seed baring trees and fruit bearing trees, nothing about what u can eat there
so the point is till the parcific verse is known i can not tell u what it is actually meaning, and i dont rely on people niak as he knows very little and only abuse the bible
Campbell's such a loser -.-
Im so angry how Dr. Naik keeps getting cut off while there is time left!
And Campbell's isn't even actually answering the questions, he's evading.
weirdpeopleonearth 4 weeks ago
i don't really understand what he is saying... is there any video with the subtitles??
MrPoupstar 1 month ago
After All He is trained By great orator Sheikh Ahmed deedat.
AhmedsFarooq 1 month ago
allahuakbar
allahuakbar
allahuakbar
:(
MalaysiaPukimak 1 month ago
لا إله إلا الله محمد رسول الله
cenasucks4eva 1 month ago in playlist More videos from tabarak11 2
Dr William Cambell is not a match for Dr Zakir Naik. He's too easy for Dr Zakir.
Zahyr99 2 months ago 2
MR cambel if everything is your belief and you cant proof it like Dr.zakir then you must sit at home with your ideas why are you here in front of such great scholer
sikandernawaz 2 months ago
Is it just a coincidence that the camera stopped at a guy for like 4 seconds when Zakir Naik was talking about the missing link being an ape
shiney94 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RECEIVE/COPY A NEW BOOK (Donated)
Topics: THE WEAPON THAT CAN BREAK THE CYCLE OF WAR AND TERRORISM, Debated Issues, Science, Law, Politics, Others.
Websites:
you free web.com balancedway
announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
wix.com/balancedwaybalancedw/announcements-balancedway
You Free Web.com/announcements-balancedway
See pictures at figure4etc1.yolasite.com, figure4etc2.yolasite.com
SPREAD THIS BOOK AND CONQUER THE SPREADING EVIL BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE - FOR FREEDOM AND PEACE.
TheServiceWeb 3 months ago
injeel was in Aramaic language i think so
ilovladoo 4 months ago
Someone PLEASE, link to me or even name the Video Cassette's he is talking about.
mo389 5 months ago
hey is that Jamal Badawi sitting next to Zakir Naik ? 3:40 . omg i think thats Jamal Badawi what is he doing there, what they are forming a club ? 5:09 omg thats jamal badawi
13yoyo1 5 months ago
hey is that Jamal Badawi sitting next to Zakir Naik ? 3:40 . omg i think thats Jamal Badawi what is he doing there, what they are forming a club ?
13yoyo1 5 months ago
I am watching this 2011
afzalrafid 5 months ago
evolution is a fact and not a theory.
adeejo 5 months ago
@adeejo
where was the evolution before the big bang?? why don't we change to better living things if humans existed thousands years ago?? have the evolution stopped ?? how and why??
vandera7mad 3 months ago
@vandera7mad to answer your first question evolution has nothing to do with big bang theory. Secondly, there is micro-evolution that is occurring. evolution is a continuous process.
adeejo 2 months ago
@adeejo i would to u see u prove it. thanks.
sulfrix 1 month ago
@sulfrix *would like
sulfrix 1 month ago
@sulfrix Listen to Ahmed deedat he is a legend but passed away you should be able to understand him better :)
hanerp1 2 weeks ago
soooo sad Dr William Cambell can answer even the simplest que
RaiderBlader1 5 months ago
William Cambell thinks at 03:58 " hey nice idea, now i am gonna read the question in 5 minutes"
krsdten13 6 months ago
I can't stop laughing.
Dr Cambell, "I know I didn't answer your question, but my faith is in Christ, my savior".
Someone please tell me what the heck was that?!?!?
DaRkNeMeZiZ 6 months ago
the moderator is so far from the truth but dwelling in falsehood...may Allah (swt) give him hidayah
farhan86a 6 months ago
hahahahah william cambell such as a clown.......dr zakir you are the man...
ASKN8 6 months ago
cambel is being burnt by Dr. Zakir Naik. Cambel can't even answer the questions asked to him..
ninehoursful 6 months ago
please next time get a timer and tell the christian guy to look properly at his timer
adhan99 6 months ago 3
@MrStrumhard
i don't think it's a conspiracy coz if you lip-read,you'll come to know there's nothing special in it(i'm not talking about this particular videos though but noticed it in previous ones)
fragrantsoul19 6 months ago
campbell n the moderator r the apostate of satan,all fear zakir,
MrKhalmaster 7 months ago
take out ur napkin Christians cuz u just got served
ancientastronautt 7 months ago
WTF is that guy stopping him before time??
SanaH05 8 months ago
Damn, Campbell isn't even trying anymore...
ddrddrddrddr 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jesus never said "I am God", BUT ANOTHER MAN in the bible did say it, click on my channel to see...
youneekk 8 months ago
What is wrong with this Campbell dude?
Isnt there no other very knowledgeable religious Christian?
Haaaaaaih
pijoed 9 months ago
i'm proud of him....
AreYie93ae 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
~"The secret of creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. This is what Dr.Zakir Does - Hide and Manipulate Sources"~
Dr.Zakir Naik is on a mission to Islamise all religions. He seems to follow the footsteps of Muhammad who encouraged lying to deceive enemies. Dr.Zakir Naik needs to increase his IMAN by reading the Qur'an and believing in its sanctity rather than lying and spreading gossips about other religions' scriptures.
We can easily infer that Muhammad is no match to Gautama Buddha.
Dambis0 9 months ago
Dr William Cambell knows his lost this debate, Dr Zakir Naik he answers the question in full, Cambell only gives a breif answer and hardly answers the question. Which clearly proves ISLAM IS THE TRUE RELIGION OF HUMANITY. SubhanAllah
CraziiGyal786 9 months ago 6
"Dr.cambell if can't answer the contradiction in genesis regarding the creation don't u think that proves that the bible is unscientific therefore not from God?" 04:20 AND HE ANSWER THE QUESTION CHEAPLY..and the said "I know that doesn't answer ur qstion,but my faith is in christ for my savior"...WHAT KIND OF ANSWER IS THAT...!!!! HAHAHA....you living in a dream man.
ivanxmahya 9 months ago
that Mr Samuel 'no man' keeps on stopping Dr zakir naik way before he's times run out. its obvious he thinks dr naik has won the debate, Alhadulillah, but he cant stand it.
sharpiceful 9 months ago
why the X tian Moderator always deliberately prevents the speaker to complete the answer?so manipulated the event may ALLAH send that man a complete "Wrath"on his life here and after.
TheSuperSPyking 9 months ago
cambell:- faith i believe in bible jesus god yes yes
oh sorry (goes to the mic) aaah i have faith thank u, sleeps then walks, imagines to sit then falls down
TheGlueFace 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dr campbell said there is no barrier between the waters in this debate? there is.
here is the proof: /watch?v=q1YhH3QUu00
You can never say Allah is wrong in anything, you're only proving that you do not understand.
xdeadromeox 11 months ago
i don't understand my christian brothers waste their time with this nonbelivers.why do they question our faith?????? GO TO MEKA
vickify 11 months ago
dr. ZAKIR,,,, How do you dothis my brother? know the bible and the qoran by heart. may Allah bless you
sabani27 11 months ago 3
@sabani27 And he knows the indian scripters and the other theorys and much much more brother :)
crusherrer 10 months ago
Come on ppl, Lets nt put down the christians. Allah, Muhammad(S.A.W) , jesus and Islam is nt for us muslims alone. Of course they will feel insecure. Put us in their shoes. We'll be angry and frustrated rite? We are human beings with egos.
Give them time. Show them the rite path. Invite them to Allah's way. Remember, we are brothers and sisters who are unfortunately born in families with different religious beliefs.
violord 11 months ago
i loveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
muhammedmunawaralam 1 year ago
Quran:
(Surah-4-the women-vs-174)
O people! Surely there has come to you manifest proof from your lord and we have sent to you clear light.
175- Then as for those who believe in Allah and hold fast by him, he will cause them to enter into his mercy and grace and guide them to himself on a right path.
bibleresponse 1 year ago
Quran:
(Surah-4-the women-vs-82)
Do they not then meditate on the quran? And if it were from any other then Allah, they would have found in it many a discrepancy.
Quran:
(Surah-4-the women-vs-105)
Surely we have revealed the book to you with the truth that you may judge between people by means of that which Allah has taught you; and be not an advocate on behalf of the treacherous.
106- And ask forgiveness of Allah; surely Allah is forgiving,
bibleresponse 1 year ago
Somtimes I've got this feelin that dr. zakir is the imam Mahdi.... He has full knowledge about islam and many things....Mannn he's just tooooooo goooooddd...
privatelitz 1 year ago
man dr. Zakir is GOOD!
ameer2812 1 year ago
What would dr william cambell lose if he admits that he is wrong or
crusherrer 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch out the latest debate of Zakir Naik at Oxford Union on the topic "ISLAM & 21ST CENTURY" in my account.
islamnpeace 1 year ago
The christans is afraid of the truth, so he always gives him less time, don't trust christians, they are worst than kaffir
kurdishleader 1 year ago
@kurdishleader damn right AMERICAN Christian's are worth creature on earth even kafir will forgive by Allah if God Wants but not for Mushrik No chance
ilovladoo 4 months ago
wow this ch moderator is so dumb...bunch a cameras around him,they r recording the debate and he thinks no one is going to notice?
atproductions10 1 year ago
This is a very good programme, keep it up You Tube.
Baharom107 1 year ago
why they stoping my brother dr. naik, before his time... DAMN... they so scared, so they should stay home...... and dr. cambell, your like a puppet.....just keep repeating everything, mabye, or eventually you will have your own words..
321godson 1 year ago 35
This has been flagged as spam show
@321godson I HAVE FOUND A VERSE THAT CONTRADICTS THE TORAH AND QUR'AN....................THAT VERSE IS..............................The LORD says to my Lord: "Sit at My right hand, until I make Thine enemies a footstool for Thy feet." (Psalm 110:1)..................THIS PROVES THAT GOD HAS A DIVINITY AND THAT JESUS MUST BE THE SON OF GOD WHO IS TALKING TO THE FATHER "the LORD says to my lord" .......WHAT DOES THAT MEAN!!!!!!
ANSWER ME MUSLIMS....WHAT DOES IT MEAN????
Mrignorance666 9 months ago
@321godson
yea dude,His only proof in the factuality of the bible is that his faith affirms him even when it doesnt make any sense.
mo389 5 months ago
why are the Christians always stuck with no answers ?????
dr10638j 1 year ago
someboby forced dr cambell to this debate?
i don't thing he should wast his time with this clown for childreens zakir hamed islamabad faroud al bathal sheik mamoud islam.
shalimaar444 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
24 minutes ago who said bible is word of god...that might be wrong statement... bible is the historical evidence..it is a true history book i guess.
Jesus is the word of God. bible tells about the jesus (word of god).
sudheernorway 1 year ago
what was the name of the lord before qurn existed???? what books were there about lord before Quran. Quran has come after jesus during Mohammed period i guess.
i believe everybody used to believe in Torah. even quran says to believ in torah.
sudheernorway 1 year ago
@sudheernorway yahudis believe in G-d is One
ilovladoo 4 months ago
Comment removed
sudheernorway 1 year ago
zakir naik is saying if jesus says that he is god then zakir naik will accept jesus is god. zakir naik he wont believe that trinity is not there.
trinity is available in bible: Isaiah 48:16-17.
jesus indirectly said that he is god: John 8:58 "I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am. "
in john.10:33 jews were giving witness: jews were talking to jesus "and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God.” -it is clear that jesus is god
sudheernorway 1 year ago
@sudheernorway, and yet, Jesus referred to Himself “the Son of Man” more times than ALL other titles COMBINED!
And yet, Numbers 23:19 flatly says that God is NOT the SON OF MAN!!
So much for Jesus being God.
COMALiteJ 1 year ago
as muslims we have to be fair, and u cant deny its kind of messed up how they let him answer the question on evolution but didnt let william answer the question on jesus pbuh.
muslim2theend 1 year ago
1000 of fools accepting what ever he says...... i will prove. zakhir naik gave a stupid ridiculous explanation about reflection and lamp. He said that Lamp reflects the light and god is light he himself existed in him as lamp and he reflects the light. what is ths???? light is different nd lamp is different. lamp is combination of bulb(light) and reflector. they are two objects. he has to accept trinity. light (bulb) is lord, reflector is jesus and reflected light is holy spirit.
sudheernorway 1 year ago
@sudheernorway
brother , thats not what he said , look at the verse. please don't twist the words around , because its what is in the quran look at the verse. i believe it said it was a light and ALSO..then it mentioned the lamp. look at the verse/ video again :)
god bless you.
muslim2theend 1 year ago
Comment removed
sudheernorway 1 year ago
hey i have given comment to wrong video i think. i dont remember that was wich part of the video. One kid who was wearing spects gets up and asks about the refraction of light regarding the god. refer that.
sudheernorway 1 year ago
It made me mad how Dr. Zakir Naik kept getting cut off when he had plenty of time left.
05lowell05 1 year ago 65
@05lowell05 They're just scared that Dr. Zakir would open the eyes of the christians and make them see that Islam is the true religion.
Foxtrot027 1 year ago
@05lowell05
I think this proves to the christian audience that Dr Zakir was speaking the truth ..
al7aader 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fuck this religions ,live in humanity
09sudhir09 1 year ago
@09sudhir09 and after death? You accept the first law of thermodynamics - Conservation of Energy with the only standhold that it hasn't been proven wrong, yet you do not acknowledge the Quraan with hasn't been proven wrong either.. No where in the Quraan it says to go to war, in fact it's the opposite, it is a sign of peace.. please dont speak without any knowledge
dadush4 1 year ago
well chucka59... its not about people who presenting it... its all about the book is true or is it corrupted...
DELAMAR85 1 year ago
I enjoyed this debate very interesting
MegaJgar 1 year ago
I can't believe the christians have this guy representing the bible....what a numb nuts....get someone with more of a back bone...wow.....but my opinion is its all the same bull shit....same theme....
chucka59 1 year ago
the mediaotor knows whats up they r looking like fools min by min. an still christians are blind. i bet 90% of the christians in that building convert after this debate
actedit 1 year ago
@actedit i agree with you... he's( Dr. Cambell ) not answering any question... and the mods always cut when its reach 3.5min... that was sooooooooo anoyying...Dr. Cambell only mumbling about nothing related to the question... in every debate i havent see any Christian believer can answer correctly... according to the questioner question... I also believe 30-50% Christian believer convert to Islam...
DELAMAR85 1 year ago
@DELAMAR85 yes absolutley true... u kno all we can do is pray for these ppl that one day god will guide them to the path of truth.
actedit 1 year ago
Dr. William Cambell
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Salcko 1 year ago
cristianity is just a belive but not fact!!
amirzubairmughal 1 year ago
damned christian moderator so annoying cutting zakir off
Propaine187 1 year ago
3:20 dont he know he was being video at that time
hanokhlkha 1 year ago
zakir naik last time announced to debate with anybody who brings 10000 people audience from his side. i think yu (who are barking) just try for it and let god almighty give yu the chance.
aadammahdi 1 year ago
i feel a little sorry for dr cambell he knows the truth islam is the truth he just doesnt want to admit it. he mite have been raised a christian but he should still look into islam
dr cambell would make a great muslim inshallah Allah will guide him.
islamdaonlytruth 1 year ago
what coocked setup this is ... poor cambell fall prey to it
picologupta 1 year ago
the earth is flat and circle. great. double wrong. how?
yuslan 1 year ago
Starting his talk "Every time u crush a bug" even his statements in figurative is bad, how can a man of god speak of killing in the first place.
ARTKOREflix 1 year ago
Anyone know what the question was referring to when talking about Genesis contradiction on creation which campbell and answer
hamzie11 1 year ago
@:Booiggers : its true that the "Quran" is not a book of science.. As Dr. Zakir had mentioned earlier that Quran is a book of "signs" not " science "..
simplynilu 1 year ago
Fucking bitch keeps cutting Zakir Naik off. He gives him 3-4 minutes when he is supposed to get 5
Socom4u2 1 year ago
does anyone know where i could get Dr.Zakir's CD's?
I wish all muslims were like him.
soosmanfookh 1 year ago
Dr ZaKir cannot explain how a virgin birth is possible scientifically..which is in both the bible and as well as the Quran..It is true that Bible is not a science book..so is Quran.
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers : its true that the "Quran" is not a book of science.. As Dr. Zakir had mentioned earlier that Quran is a book of "signs" not " science "..
simplynilu 1 year ago
@booiggers
none can explain scientifically the virgin birth, u know why ? cos it's a great miracle that support Jesus and Mary before Jews , and even all those miracles some of jews still reject him as a prophet. so u can imagine if jesus was born normally not miraculously what will be their reaction, surely they will kill him as they did with other prophets before jesus peace be upon him
qigong11 1 year ago
@qigong11..I know why a virgin birth cannot be scientifically explained..but it is not new to humanity. Krishna was born of the virgin Devaka. Horus was
born of the virgin Isis. Mercury was born of the virgin Maia. Romulus
was born of the virgin Rhea Sylvia. For some reason, many religions
force themselves to think of the birth canal as a one-way street. Besides Jesus was indeed killed..and the miraculous birth was written long after he was gone.
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers indeed the virgin birth cant be proven through science, but never the less if God decided this was the way for him to be known through the second person of the triune God, and to bring salvation unto mankind, then it would be the only plausable method to not equate sin to him as every is born with the tendacy of sinning
then i believe God has that ordained right, to save his creation
these paralell are nothing to write home about
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@booiggers krishna was born of a virgin, from what i have read on this she was not a virgin but had other children before , but this just what i read,
horis born of virgin isis and so forth is a later adaption from after the tim of Jesus, but this is not even like Jesus, as he was born like a man and this horis was some mythical creature and human
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@booiggers
but his virgin birth of jesus being written after he was gone, even though the documents were written after he was gone, there is still the prophecies concerning him in the old testament... which were fulfilled in the new testament, and we have good eye witness of this account in the bible too, and outside it
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984..The myth of horus(not to mention he cured the blind..crucified and ressurected & had 12 disciples) was written in 300 BC, long before jesus was supposed to be born..besides if you are concerned about fulfilling the OT prophecies..Virgin birth..contradicts Romans 1:3 "The Messiah must be a physical descendant of David (Rom. 1:3, Acts 2:30) " which disapproves that prophecy since he can only be a physical descendant if he was born of joseph and not a miraculous virgin birth.
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers where is the proof of his death and resurection, if anything this is a later addition as i have never found anything earier than hundred yrs after jesus
he was supposidly born to a godess , and this nothing like christianity
as for the twelve disciple , plz give me the info regarding this, as with out these things its not the same
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984 Its funny when a christian asks for a proof..when there is no historical proof of the miracles nor the resurrection of jesus christ.."Gerald Massey (Ancient Egypt, the Light of the World): "Pistis Sophia, in agreement with the Book of Hades shows how the twelve as followers of Horus were constituted as a company that consisted at first of seven to which the five were added in forming the group of twelve." and not to mention the sacred no12 is used it many other religions too
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers now ur stretch a lil aint u, if anything the bible counts as a source in its self, then u have outside documentation about the death and resurrection of Christ like tasitus, and so forth, there are plenty of them my friend just do the study rself
the twelve disciple of hous is not a fact , as there is no info on them,
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984 Bible is not a historical source..examples:- A talking ASS (NUMBERS 22:27-28)..and talking snakes..4 footed birds (LEVITICUS 11:20)..7 headed leopards REVELATION 13:1-2..never existed in the history of time..the other sources which you claim like..Tacitus..who was born in 56 AD when "Chrestianity" existed at that time..how can his words through "hearsay" can be taken as credible historical proof...why dont you read the book of hades..to find about horus's 12 disciples!
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers a talking ass ----------- obviously u need to read it again cause God was projecting his voice through the ass, a donkey
a talking snake, this was the form of satan in the time period, i know this is hard to believe but its the way he choose to to do, but its not these thing i am refering to but the more major thing people, place and so forth
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984 God was projecting his voice through an ass..why dont we see such talking donkey these days...we would have nothing to argue about..lol
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers i cant believe this is the best u have to offer, this was apart of a situatuation in that time ok ,
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@booiggers
come on now the seven headed leopard in releation is not an actual creature its a abstract way of detail kingdom that would rule the earth or a place at a certain time
how can ur words be trusted, being two thousand years later, so i will go with the early historian and the early sources we have about the life of jesus
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@booiggers even if he had twelve disciples this has no real relievence to my faith, its just another interesting but non reliable fact that u want to throw out
there were more than twelve disiples after jesus left,
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984 when I read a religious book which is full of myths and fables & some historical records..I compare it with other myths which existed at that time..most of what is in the bible is from sumerian mythology..the noah story is from epic of Gilgamesh..I know historically it has no reference..my beliefs are based on facts which is based on evidence..but no matter how many errors are found in the bible it is rationalized,or attributed to translational errors & metaphors. Its sad!
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers thats the thing ur already in the mind that something is a myth, or is being copied, so here is the question, if there is no God , like i assume u believe, then u think all things came from nothing, and some hpw chaos created something as beautiful and complex as the univers and solor systems, n all the galaxies.
ok since u base ur beliefs on fact as u claim, what are ur beliefs
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984
“I don’t know yet” is a valid scientific answer. Science is an attempt to understand what we do know, and slowly attain knowledge that will help us understand what we do not know. Until we get that evidence, “we don’t know yet” is acceptable..but you believers claim to know everything..without any evidence..just because it was written in an ancient book..
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers no, fact is u have it wrong i dont claim to know everything, but sciece in its self is a adaptive process and can not always be a solid definitive approach
and to accept the big bang theory as our existance is some where in the unbelieveable range, cause to do so mean that we have no purpose and that we are basically an accident
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984 A temporary lack of scientific evidence doesnt mean the possible answer is god. Ants only live for 90 days..dont you think it has a purpose to live for those 90 days..or does it have to believe in "after life" heaven and hell..in order to survive.
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers no, i never said that i was pointing out that the lack of evidence actually means their theory is unprovable , ther for is a theory
but the idea that we are off cast of a big bang is just very unsubstanciated, even so the science feel we may have evolved from an ape or a micro organism, so what is it
we are not talking of ants even they have structure and complex system, as we do, and this is not something that came from nothing
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984 Logically speaking..if everything must be created..then the creator must have a creator..if you agree that some powerful entity always existed and no one have to create it..then the same logic can be applied..to the universe..for no one had to create it..
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers no, the creator doesnthave a creator, he is eternl and always been there
so ur saying univer has no beginning then wan science and my faith say it does
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@booiggers
this show that there is a creater, something powerful that can ceate some thing as complex as a human, all the cells to form a strcture, and give us different dna patterns, and so forth
to say there is no God is a little premature in ur think, how did we get to the place we are at
a building didnt just happen over night, and this has a complex structure that take a lot of precise presitioning to make what it is,
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984 you are talking about intelligent design..how science approach anything is based on evidence..is there any evidence to prove the existence of god..no..talking about dna patterns..the bonobo apes and our ancestors share the same dna pattern..that is an evidence..however..man being made from mud..is unscientific..there were many scientist who were christians after several research found nothing that support the creationism.
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers is there any proof the existance of God, apart from the universe, me and you , and other living creature, then u may have a point, but since we all have different d n a , look different, then i say that there is a God or a powerful being
science can not accountfor human life, its comes up with different theories every time,
im not dismissing science, im just saying that everything proves God,
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984 The existence of various life forms with different dna doesnt equates to god..it equates to evolution..survival of the fittest! Science is humble enough to disapprove or approve a theory based on evidence..but no matter how many evidence anyone come up with.. to disapprove religious beliefs..it is ignored..im gonna end this discussion from my side..laterzz!!
"Facts do not cease to exist simply because they are ignored." Aldous Huxley
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers well actually ur arguing from silence, simply cause dna just does spring from nothing ---- to have a comprehensive ystem like human body u need a far comprehenive being to create it,
and to say this all happen cause of the big bang is llike dancing on thin ice cause as i will make clear a comprehensive system need a designer as itcant come into being out of chaos
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@booiggers whats sad is most of the so called error one can point is only limited understanding, so yet if we say some lil glitch is down to transalational reason then that is a likely course
or prehaps it down to a problem of not read to accounts to really understand what been said, or maybe its a verient reading
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@booiggers who said about the miracles, i was on abou horis death and resurrection, as this was a later addition as i said he wasnt born of a virgin but had a father
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@booiggers as for u trying to disprove the virgin birth by using the two passage about his heritage through david,
well Jesus has two natures one is man which is seen through the seed of david, and the other is his divine nature, and if God choose this as apart of the mean to provide salvation, who are we to judge
its not contradiction, its a contrasting statement, about his two natures, a contradiction would be if it said he wasnt born miraculosly and then said later he was
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984 You are wrong again..theologically the human nature of jesus was from the human "mary" and the divine nature from "heavenly father"..either, he was born cause joseph impregnate mary or it was the holy spirt..it cannot be both..if he was born of joseph's sperm then the miraculous birth is false..if he was born miraculously then the didnt fulfill the prophecy of him being a physical descendant! Period.
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers that is what i was saying that th human nature is of mary and it also has oots of david too, and the divine is of God
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984 how can it be of davids too..if joseph had nothing to do with the birth of jesus..now you are being irrational my friend! "The way to see by FAITH is to shut the eye of reason." Ben Franklin
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers mary is from the linage of david too, through another son and as joseph is to
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984 show me a biblical verse..to assert this statement that mary was also a physical descendant of david..you disagree all the facts right before your eyes cause its against your beliefs..besides my original question was directed to a muslim..because muslim scholars who criticise bible for its mythological beliefs and quote it unscientific..while they believe in virgin births..its funny! when we dont see such miraculous birth or people walking on water these days.
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers glad to hear from u again, i will in luke three : twenty three
what fac are refering too, mate as of yet haveno real facts just theory and at best very poor ones
u need to give omething more reliable cause ur words are not credible
sorry but as i said science is not a good way of prooving a religion, therefore i dont use it to prove it, but in a way God himself proves himself in a way that is own doing
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984 =Luke 3:23 proves that mary was a physical descendant of david?.lets see "And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was [the son] of Heli," Heli is the father of joseph..not mary..and mathew contradicts it by said it was jacob..besides mathew comes up with 28 immediate descendants and luke comes up with 42..FROM DAVID TO JESUS..and none of the name matches..im sure many historians would find it contradictory..
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers heli is marys father and joseph father in law as josephs is jacob read matt one
its not cotradictory one is through the mother and the other is through the step father
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984 Luke 3:23 says Jesus son of joseph- son of heli! and how you say heli is marys father..can you post the entire verse..where it says heli is the father of mary..now you are contradicting bible!
"To surrender to ignorance and call it God has always been premature, and it remains premature to this day." Isaac Asimov
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers as i said luke is telling jesus through his mothers family, so that is why the names are different, heli is josoph father n law, and jesus grandfther through mary
i'm not contradictin, u just need to read both and see that one is through the mother, and one is through his step father, but i agree to some extent that i may cause problem , if u dont do any in depth studying
can i post a verse of heli being marys father, well going on what u say then joseph had two fathers,
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984 I dont want to know what you feel about the verses or what it couldve been..the verses shows nothing about mary..or her being the daughter of heli..if so paste the verses here...lol im not saying joseph had two fathers..only your bible is claiming so..i dont want rationalize an obvious mistake..based on my own opinion or yours..show me the verses..or shushhhhh!
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers well all i am saying for them both to be true, then one is surely linked through her to koseph as his fther in law, cause a man cant have to father can he..... i have heard so many different ways that these verses can be applied, some really good but not as logical as the way i fee and een the commontaries are on my side
i dont believe it is saying he had two fathers, i believe that cause one says father in linking and the other says son, one can be applied to the father in law
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984 post the verses..and discuss..i really dont want to know what you believe..we are discussing about what is written..in the bible..lets stick to that..post the verse line by line and show me how you came to that conclusion..
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers
and Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ
here the link says the father of ......
Joseph, the son of Heli
and here the link is son of
i admit that there is a whole lot of info there, but what do have is that a man supposedly has two father but one is not his biological father but his father in law , if it has to accounted for
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984 Jacob is the father of Joseph..Joseph is the son of heli..what is the difference..father and father in law...arent the same.."The way to see by FAITH is to shut the eye of reason." Ben Franklin
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers no ur missing the point, i said they werent the same person, i said one is his father and the other could be his father in law
but there is another possibility that it is the same person, as most people went by two different names, like matthew the tax collector, who was called levi
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984 This is exactly what is called as "rationalizing" an error..oh they might have two names..or it couldve been the father in law..who cares.. luke comes up with 42 generations and mathew only 28..logicians and historians wont agree with you..some people go father to any extent to make them look irrational or even stupid..in order to defend their faith...Its sad..
booiggers 1 year ago
@booiggers i agree that not all people wil agree upon the basis of the geneologies as they dont leave much room fortotal understanding, but that is not a bad thing that there is some different view on this subject, cause it sheds nw light on, but no matter how u look at it it is eith a ----- his father in one and father la in the other which is acceptable veiw or as i previously said not all people were known to have last names and instead use multiple names like matthew does
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@booiggers which does make whole lots of sence, so its a plausable explination, considering one say father of, and the other say son of, that one may be through marriage
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@booiggers irrational, hardly, im just sking for proof, u throw a claim with no evidence to back it up, such as the crucifixion and resurrection of horus, and u want me to believe something that simply has no solid evidence for it, so im not being irrational, im being logical and raional, so its more about u proove ur claim , otherwise its an unsubstanciated claim
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@booiggers plus all reptiple source conclude that horis had a father, as his mother revived his dad and had sex with him, so no paralell, and the crucifixion was not known in his time either
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@booiggers
come on man we are talking about mankind not some myths, Egyptian, Indian and Greek they are all mythical creatures created by satan to keep the mankind away from the right path
qigong11 1 year ago
2:48 sounds like 'Vagina'...
paratrip 1 year ago
*the
Ali313xx 1 year ago
Y was tge moderator cheating.. Didn't anybody notice
Ali313xx 1 year ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
Zakir Naik gets butchered by ali sina of faithfreedom (dot)org.Every single thing he said has been demolished beyond the slightest ability to refute.May you be blessed Ali Sina.
And this zakir dude never got the guts to debate with ali sina despite Ali challenging zakir.
Ali is the founder of faithfreedom(dot)org .Vist that site for the truth.
w3(dot)faithfreedom(dot)org/debates/NaikCampbellintro(dot htm)
go to w3(dot)faithfreedom(dot)org and view the debates page for more
chilltemper 1 year ago
Non believers will try endless in attempt to find mistakes in the Quran but one thing they fail to realize is that no matter how many people get together and do MOT Test on Quran, the Quran will NEVER require service, Its message is established for life. It is also an open challenge from Allah (swt)
People will translate at all levels to mislead those who seek knowledge but it only requires common sense to understand why this is being done. For proper knowledge read AUTHENTIC sources only
kay2furious 1 year ago 13
Dr Cambell isnt answering answers?!!!!!!!!!
diurnalusman 1 year ago 16
@diurnalusman i notice that, but maybe it cos he is a a cross road, to let science determine what he can cant do, or what he has done, how he done , science should never be a way of proving religion as its form changes so often, and God doesn't, he remains the same, and can not and should not be decifered through science for god created science and all of it ways by creating us to interpret it
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984 i think zakir naik awnsered your statement when he said that you should not prove religion with scientifical THEORIES since they make U turns all the time(i.e evolution theory) BUT you should try to prove religion with scientifical facts since they are facts and unchancheble(i.e the moon and sun have its own orbits) so that is what zakir naik has proven that the bible goes against established scientifical facts while the Quran gives you scientifical facts 1400 years ago
TurkishMujahid 1 year ago
@TurkishMujahid the bible goes against scientific fact , name them, niak has no idea about the bible as he i not letting speak, and is speaking for it
but give e just a few
even though i dont use science to bac the bible, there is plenty of proofs from archeology and history
and if science is proven anything its not God and his its this man misrepresentation of the bible
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@followerofjesus1984 my God have you not watched the entire debate ? zakir naik gives 100s of scientific errors .. 1.Book of Leviticus ch 14 : V49-53 (that you can disinfect a house from lepracy by sprinkling birdblood on it)-->goes against science
2.1verse earth is flat 2. it is circel -->both are scientificaly incorrect
3.bible says all plants are eatable-->wrong goes against science
4.bible says humans are created by churred cheese and milk -->copied from hypocrates wrong
TurkishMujahid 1 year ago
@TurkishMujahid
1 ---- was ritual that was applied in those times, whih is in line and keeping with the whole redemptive work of Christs redemptive work, but there is no mention in those verse what it is to be aided to, so leprosy is a wild guess and this no longer applies to this day
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@TurkishMujahid
3 ----- the bible say that all plants are edable, until i know the exact verse this remain known to it true content, but i think its in genesis one
which all it say is let there be seed baring trees and fruit bearing trees, nothing about what u can eat there
so the point is till the parcific verse is known i can not tell u what it is actually meaning, and i dont rely on people niak as he knows very little and only abuse the bible
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago
@TurkishMujahid
4 ----- where do u find this amazing verse which does not exist in the bible about humans are created by churred cheese and milk ?
give me the book, chapter and verse
followerofjesus1984 1 year ago