Added: 3 years ago
From: Gamehelper
Views: 91,326
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (243)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • to bad that it never came on xbox or ps3

  • The same could be said for capitalism.

  • i was soooo pissed off when i found out they cancelled putting WIC on to ps3 or xbox,

  • the U.S. and the world would've never held the Soviets if the Cold War would've turned into a Hot War...

  • Comment removed

  • Too bad for europe

  • Thank God!Russia is not the communists.

  • hey ... did anyone know the link to update #010 ? i have world in conflict soviet assault ... i download it at Utorrent ... and only to find update left .... help me plz ? -_-

  • 2:00 No life

  • It's a good game until you met your first arti noob.

  • You know what's sad? If the Soviet Union and the United States worked together they could've reshaped the world for the good of all. . . It was not meant to be.

  • @MilkCartonPresents You know what's better for humankind? If the USSR invaded the US in the 70s. All the stupid VIetnam War, Afghan War and till now, War on Terror won't happen

  • @haikal96ful yeah we whouldn't be alive atm

  • @haikal96ful

    What? That would have caused mass destruction. Far greater than any war... The wars between the two super powers would have led to World War 3, and a chance of nuclear warfare.

  • @KSH2006 The US and Europe would be occupied before they could launch a counter-attack, accurately. Well, if the americans provoked with the usage of ICBMs, well it's their fate..Pity, the USSR is just to slow

  • @haikal96ful

    Starting a two front war... not going to happen, USSR would be spreading their forces thin. There are way too many risks involved. It would take a large force to successfully attack another super power and mobilizing such a massive force will alert the US. If the Soviets did invade the USA and were successful in their invasion, USA would have used their nuclear bombs. We're talking about the cold war era, USA and Soviet Union were not lallygagging.

  • VIIVA LA URSS fucking and stupid e idiot USA ..

  • In Soviet Russia, You do not play games,Games play you....

  • my favourite games were made in 2007! CoD4 and WiC!

    (i also love BC2 and MW2 but thats an other question. CoD4 will be a forever favourite and so will WiC)

  • @gabrocki oh and Earth 2160. but that was made in 2005 i think xD thats awesome too. amazing soundtrack. these games all have awesome soundtracks: WiC, CoD4, CoDMW2, BC2, Earth 2160.

  • A Russian never surrender

  • I want this game for Xbox 360 but its hard to find it.

  • @xxxxroManxxxx It never came to console.

  • whats the song its aswome

  • Russia is definition of beast

  • Do I need world in conflict to get this? Please answer back.

    Thanks in advance.

  • @trofet

    ofcourse you do

  • did this ever come out for consoles?

  • i dont think it ever did

  • no...... :(

  • They Scraped the Idear in mid 2008

  • @Boblikesfish888 i do think it will be though because over here in UK the main game company is game and on there you can pre-order this game for the ps3 and 360

  • nah order of war is almost like a copy of WiC

  • order of war sucks! i thought it was going to be better...

  • i have it :D

    but i m having a lil problem i cant open custom missions? i wanna to but i just for some reason cant -_-

    any help plz?

  • Russian do not surrender!

  • Americans never quit!

  • best games

  • this would be one kick ass fps

  • then theres like a dumbass controlling ur squad and stuff

  • I'm not sure that Order of War is better than Wic (probable not), still it's really worth trying.

  • What is Order of War? Haven't heard of that yet. Something new? Anyway, it can't be better than WiC. At least until I try the demo.

  • Reminds me of Order of War but in morden days with modern weapons and on smaller scale. Is it as simple and accessible as OOW which is actually my first RTS experience. Explosions look better in WiC. Is it ingame video btw?

  • actually, Order of War is mostly copied from world in conflict, not totally copied, but they used most of the "base" tactics and the mass tank spam, among other things :?

  • Still Order of War is lots of fun. Multiplayer is awesome. And there are many more tactics to be used but for spamming tanks.

  • my pc just couldn't handle it :(

  • is it playable for the PC??

  • Yes it is

  • Its only playable for the pc

  • it is for playstation 3 and xbox360 as well. it says it on there

  • you are right!

  • It got cancled. Look it up on wikipedia.

  • when you hear "nuke"... where is supposed to be the tactical part???

  • FAMAS? lol did you ever not seen FAMAS in the game in the first WIC you can see already FAMAS there!!! and i get bored to this game because my video card sucks and my texture is low in the game but now i can run the setting to the max!

  • 2:05 famas?

  • Its when your fighting in France, FAMAS is a main French weapon.

  • Graphics are better on World in Conflict than this game.

  • Since when does eye candy = Gameplay?

    Noob fail.

  • It's such a shame the console versions got scrapped because EndWar flopped. The reason EndWar flopped was because it was genero-space marine shit. Cold War? Much more exciting... If only EndWar wasn't so bad we might have had a good game to play :/ Kinda weird when you think about it.

  • nice ich liebe world in conflict ich habe des 1 schon hehe

  • why the fuck didnt this come out for console,  like they said it wud

  • Oh yes I'm ready for war!!!!!!

  • is released world in conflict soviet assault demo?

  • BIG PROBLEM! i have world in conflict complete edition, and it should contain world in conflict and the expansion sovjet assault. but i have only the sovjet campaign!?!? where is the american campaign!?

  • when you click on campaing, on the top of the screen there is a Faction box, it says either USSR or US! Just choose the US faction

  • So USSR is avaliable to play? Finaly i can be the agressor and kick some U-ASS-A ass!

  • damn, AWESOME GAME!!! but i hate the damn story line! and i hate that u cant choose ur side and actually win the war with it! >:(

  • dude this is story-based game, not a game like eu3 or strategy games like civilization... this is like cod4 or other games, where there must be a story, or the game gets unplayable.

  • ok u have a point, but what i was trying to say is that u should b able to pick a side and each side should have its own distict story line, like in C&C Red Alert. I hope that they take what they have created and improve on it

  • Sadly it seems it was cancelled on the consoles but SA is out on PC - "Plans to release the game under the same name for home consoles, the Xbox 360 and the PlayStation 3 have been dropped"

  • has it even came out 4 xbox 360?

  • Unfortunately they canceled the console releases

  • hey i bought "Soviet Assult" installed it, turned it on but cant find were u choose sides, in other words i cant find the "Soviet Assult" expansion pac. do i have to play the whole allied campaign to unlock it?

  • INFANTRIA666 you cant choose a side to play as, you just have to start a new campaign that's all and you just keep playing

  • The soviet assault missions and combined with the origional missions.

  • you play the campaign it combined the original with the new for some reason (as in you play 2 american missions and then a soviet one)

  • yeah! way to go! got the game!

  • Hey Is it any good? Do you fight in New York?

  • Yes and the only NewYork map right now is Liberty wich no one likes very much because you start on one of 2 islands and fight over the 3rd and the only way to get to the 3rd is though helecopter or aphibous transport and the armor player usualy spons transports and takes the other players infantry to the island while air player kill the other players transports.The best thing you can get would be to airlife a light tank for 5 ta if you armor or 10 for an other role.

  • yeah quite good. but i am just at the start, now at the Berlin wall, ready to liberate west Berlin.

  • Can't wait for it to come out on Xbox 360.

  • i thougt it was a swedish game.

  • the developer is from sweden but they used the USA and USSR as the two sides!

  • this game has a good emotional aspect to it :)

  • Comment removed

  • as hard as you try you can never make war look good

  • Tactical nuke isnt, same as friendly fire isnt

  • if they use realistic nuke, nothing on the map would live. I would rather not nuke my own units, thank you.

  • where is this on PS3? because I havn't seen it!

  • what about the 360. I think the only way it will work is with the same voice command as Endwar, and this is the reason for the delay. (BIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGG delay)

  • even the smallest of tactical nukes would set hundreds of metres of land on fire from the 20 000 degree epicentre, sory bt just not realistic.

  • Would a tact nuke produce radiation like a ICBM or just a regular(strategic)nuke?

  • not as much but because it is amaller it detonates lower to the ground so there is a significant ammont of radiation released but no where near the amount from a full scale nuke or hbomb. still wouldnt want 1 landing near me

  • Right can sum1 help me out. I recently downloaded the demo of world in conflict for my pc after years of wanting the game but thinking it will never work. I installed the demo thinking that it wud work but just really lag. 2 my suprise it works fine on low graphics and ive enjoyed playing the demo for hours and it has made me want 2 buy the game so much can sum1 tell me if it will work with 480 mb Ram 60 gb ATI Radeon express 200.

  • It's pretty obvious if the demo run well then the full game will run well also. I suggest you should just pirate the game and test it,if it works good buy it,if it doesn't....well...sucks for you

  • whats with that russian building in Seattle

  • I went to a micro center in ohio and they have this game for PC which means its been released already, so stop your bitching.

  • i hope they bring out something in a expansion pack like a proper nuke that BOMBS THE MAP (yeaahh) :P

    anyways, this game looks real good, hope they get the voice thing like tom clancy endwar

  • the nukes are under rated in this game

  • That is cause they are tactical nukes, designed for a super low yield to localise the impact. hence they are called tactical not strategic :)

  • World in Conflict Soviet Assault Download Click Game ok :)

  • Comment removed

  • can someone tell me where can i downlaod this game

    please please thanks

  • go to game spot for the demo. and its cheeper to buy the full game on ebay.

  • Just goto the shops and buy it

  • If u want rapidshare link , reply this cm , i will give it 2 u

  • i will send u via msg

    (the links)

  • i love this game

  • STRATEGY

  • is this a strategy or FPS?

  • strategy

  • Actually its tactics.

  • strategy,there's no"tactics"

  • Tell me whats the difference between tactics and strategy?

  • none,but u still say its strategy

  • Then you obviously have no idea what you're talking about.

    P.S. I said it was tactics.

  • Strategy is base building long term stuff while tactics is military. For example using your tanks to form a spearhead while infantry protects your flank is a tactic. Strategic example is doing non combat stuff like building a base in a certain position or in a certain way. However there is strategy to the game but not much. It's more of a tactical game :)

  • He's right, it's real time tactics, I own the gold edition, bought it off Steam.

    It's tactics, because you only command a small portion of NATO or the Red Army at a time, while there may be hundreds of units on screen, you command maybe 10 to 15 at most.

  • It isn't tactics just because you control a portion of an army it is tactical because it's only units and no bases. the only buildings you see in this game is civilian structures and fortifications.

  • salvation14 was referring to the real life staging area wise naming for the field of scope for the game, and yes he is right.

  • Real-Time Tactics.

    RTS has base-building, or a long-term strategy.

    RTT has combat only.

    Big difference.

  • ign is right, its now a shooter generation

  • It's always been a shooter generation. Mainly because not only are shooters generally easier to play and easier to make, meaning the developers can make more intuitive gameplay. However, Strategy games have always been a strong minority, and games such as Age of Empires, Company of Heroes, Starcraft and Red Alert all have their places in gaming history. WiC just revolutionised the Strategy genre also (not to say other Strat games didn't) and added the type of gameplay usually found in RTSs.

  • guys i have a problem with it. i cant install it.... the installation wont start because of error. is anyone having this problem or know how to solve it? all other installations are working properly

  • lal, @ 1:37 they are talking and shooting at the same time. its not possible to hear what you say when you are shooting. I am in the military now and have experienced it several times.

  • ok, and this is a video game.

  • oh no shit smartass. but dont you think they are trying to make it as realistic as they can? I just pointed out a thing that many civilian people dont think about.

  • you want gamers to have their ear's blown out every time they shoot a gun?

  • It was canceled for consoles...serves them right...until they make a mouse & keyboard for consoles

  • What r u talking about. All you have to do is just plug it right a ps3 and it works. Dont know about all of the ohter consoles

  • Hmm....i don't think it's that easy...

  • Yeah, too bad 360's suck though. Can't wait to see how dummed down everything is! :D Don't you dare down rate this comment, it is nothing but truths!

  • Ahem.

    Comment Fail.

  • fucking strategy :(( I want FPSSSS

  • so this game is already on pc ? than it's a port

  • is this game going to come out soon

  • march 31'st

  • thank u.

  • iv heard that this game was cancelled

  • Its not, it just switched founder or something.

  • i think it was but bringing it out again

  • most parts of the russia is in Asia, and there is no frontline in Asia. China is in Asia too =/ Do you think Korea, Japan and all those countries in Asia will stay watching although they are getting aided by US? Kinda strange story but great game

  • They didn't. They were all attacked by China. About Russia, although most of it is in Asia, the bulk of her population and infrastructure are in Europe.

  • hmmm interesting... ok, thanks for your comment! =]

  • You're welcome. Lol, do you know that even now, the Sino-Russian relations are still somewhat friendly? The two nations view the United States as a threat due to it being the only Superpower. They both agreed that the United States is their greatest obstacle in gaining international influence and becoming superpowers themselves.

  • Sino-Soviet/Russian relations were quite hostile ever since the split. Even more so after the border conflict.

    Chinese gave aid to Cambodians during their war with Vietnam, who in turn had aid from the Soviets. Also, China attacked India, which was on very friendly terms with Soviets.

    Even now they have various disputes about borders/human rights/proper view of communism.

    And China is still very hostile towards India, giving aid to it's enemy Pakistan. And Russia is still supporting India.

  • That was then, I'm talking about now. Now they're more worried about the United States then their own past history. Their relations are getting better too, they just removed like entire brigades over the past years.

  • like* sorry

  • is this pretty much luke endwar?

  • eh no this is about the cold war, its been out over a year

  • nigger

  • phocjame this is a game a beautifuul game is true but not multiplayer strategy is only a quick game play and this is all not developing any base or make such as dominate of mapp only gets points , not a subject = like a tenis game with one unit you have conquest the mapp finish game all army is limited only graphic and repeat only graphic is what i like to this game and the fact thath is not a future game you now laser ,alien things

  • when is this game coming out???

  • its been out for over a year

  • is this just americans and russians?

  • There are three factions, USA, USSR, and NATO.

  • what about the Warsaw Pact?

  • unfortunately not, would have been a great idea to add the old soviet republics though. maybe the sequel will give the communist bloc some justice.

  • They should add China too!

  • that would be incredible, but i'm not sure how powerful they were in the late 20th century. I know the brittish still imperialized hong kong then. but some other faction would be great, like north vietnamn or korea for the communist side, and either afghanistan or israel because the united states supplied them heavily in the 80's. and NATO could just be neutral peolple pleasers like they are now.

  • Trust me, they were quite strong.

  • yeah see, HK was still under British because that was part of a 100 year old contract that was to expire in 1997. If China wasn't powerful enough by the late 20th century, Thatcher was gonna let HK stay in British rule for good.

  • when will this game come out

  • IS IT CANCELED?!

  • nnnnnnnoooooooooo!!!!!!!!!

    <:O

  • Sierra doesnt exist anymore and they said there is no info that Soviet assault will EVER come out ;(

  • Will be hard to handle this great game by gamepad?

  • What the FUCK are you on about?

  • not every american is like that. If yo uask me we need Socialism. Not comunism, but Democracy and Socialism mixed.

  • you want socialisam? do you even know what it is? IN a socialist state, if you work hard for extra money you dont get it. In a socialist state you do not get paid extra if you do extra work therefore there is no incentive to work hard and the econonomy crumbles. Also in a socialist state if you make more money because of your work the government will take your hard earned extra cash and give it to somebody who does not even bother to work. Capitalism is way better. You get rewarded for hard work

  • in socialism you take care of each other, in Capitalism you take care of yourself, you need money to survive where SOcialism you don't need to work that hard.

  • if socialism is sooooo great like you said, then how come the USSR could not come close to the US's capitalist economy even though the USSR followed socialism to the letter?

  • well because they were dirty communists. You can have socialism with democracy and all. But the USSR was too weak for anything.

  • Yes, look at CHINA - there socialism is working good! verry good - and China became so powerfull state!

  • many prosperous countries use socialism, it has possibilities if executed correctly.

  • Capitalism it is good??? Group of oligarchs which make profit of simple people, buy to itself football clubs, and not knowing where still to spend the billions when other people the beggar, here it your capitalism. It is that idea америки. Gallant! I hate America.

  • Note:AMERICA DOESNT CARE YOU ARE NO ONE TO JUDGE PLZ SHUT UP