Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (245)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Roger talk about in 2009. classy Roger. love you :)

  • @Ignozi & @ptniff LOL Still 8-6 in wins to Murray, Murray'll still get to the semis if he beats Ferrer. Murray's still getting better, Federer is still getting older so I predict not many more wins for your man.

    Oh yeah and your still dumberer than hell.

  • Murray absolutely owns Federer.

  • Comment removed

  • @mesmiths Aww perhaps he tells himself that every night. Just blank out those two slam finals.

  • @mesmiths  FAIL.

    Scotsman got straight setted like a froob. Noob.

  • @mesmiths BS, he beat him in the 2010 final.

  • the worst thing for murray is to be the favourite as it puts even more pressure on him and when it really counts, murray cant handle the pressure

  • Lmao he's like : ...Good for him, i really dont fucking care

  • @nickhockey96 nah, i think it's more about roger not caring for predictions and media favouritism like that, because he knows that anything can happen in tennis

  • Roger is speaking 2009 yaer

  • Roger was absolutely right to say Murray wasn't the faourite...how can someone who never won a slam be the favourite when roger; rafa and nole were on the draw?

  • @su79er Because leading up to the last slam of 2008 he beat *NOVAK*, then beat *NADAL* at the US Open reaching his first slam final, then slapped *FEDERER* with a loss at the last 2008 tournament (Masters Cup).

    I believe Murray fresh on the scene beating all the top guys here and there and ending 2008 on a high made him the favourite.

  • Roger is true class

  • @federerbestclass You said that already. No need to say the same again. Please use your brain a bit.

  • Roger is speaking 2009 year.

  • Roger is speaking 2009 year.

  • Roger is speaking 2009 year.

  • @federerbestclass You said that already, No need to say the same again. Please use your brain a bit

  • Roger is speaking 2009 year.

  • @Swordsman808 What hyperbole! I take it this is Rog then? Well Rog you're a smarmy twat.

  • ROFLMAAOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLOOOOOO­OOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLZZZZZZZKKKKK­KKKKKKYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY hahahahaha god that was funny!

  • also famous for chocolate and banks. As for boring, why the hell are you watching videos with him in it if you'res so bored

  • Comment removed

  • Roger was being honest and he was right. Andy ended up losing in the 4th round.

    And people who think Murray is a more complete player than Roger need to get their brains checked.

  • @Swordsman. . Do you listen or read?? This was at the beginning of the 2009 season Rafa was number 1 and in top form.. Nole was defending champ and Fed won the USO yet the bookies had Murray as the favorite...I'm surprised fed didn't hit them with a bitch please at the notion Murray being the fav...

  • Roger is speaking 2009 year

  • Rog COULD YOU BE MORE JEALOUS OF MURRAY??? I know you just beat him but he's a younger and more complete player!

  • ROFLMAO!!!!!

  • lol stop doing drugs

  • i hope you're kidding cause if not you are a complete moron and an idiot

  • @theangelraziel Nah Im not kidding. Murrays the more complete player.

  • You obviously know nothing about tennis. Fed is the most complete player i've ever seen.

    Murray is nothing more than a pusher and like all pushers his career will be over before he is 25.

    Defensive players like Murray have a use-by date. Everyone knows that so he better win a slam fast because the clock is ticking.

  • @azpark

    jealous from Murray? Yes I'm sure Roger's rolling on his bed from the sleepless nights trying to figure out a way to lose his 16 major's and be as far away from the no 1 as possible!

  • notice the space in the middle to modify to make it sound worse

  • i want murray to win even more now

  • i know his words may backfire at him

  • I hope Murray never wins a grand slam.

  • He never will... an its not even that i hope he doesn't win, but he hasn't got the mental toughness, i wasnt surprised at all that he lost today! Even made a bet with a friend of mine who said i was just pessimistic about the final cus my fav: Nadal lost to murray, but in the end i was right. There's only 1 person that can handle federer an that is nadal, but hes soon to be gone, im afraid

  • Amdy is always the favourit..... the favourit for not making it into the finals!

  • Roger love, Roger is speaking 2009 year.

  • Andy Murray is the main favorite to win every slam and supposedly the 'true' worlds number 1 for a year now, yet he didn't even reach a single final. It seems as if the bigger favorite he is the earlier he crashes out...

  • @nuncjusz1 mate what are you on? he reached the us open 2008 final

  • i meant 2009

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • It took Roger 17 slams before he won one. Andy is only on his 15, give him a chance. He will win.

  • WRONG...

    This is technically Andy Murray's 17th slam ALSO...because he missed two (FO and Wimbledon 2007) because of injury...so he still would've played those slams as a low seed and been knocked out in 3R/4R

    ALSO...Murray is 22 years old. At that age, Nadal had won 5 grand slams, Roger had won 2 grand slams and Djokovic had JUST won his 1st grand slam...

    Andy Murray still has a long way to go...and the pressure is on him!

  • Point is he wasnt so couldnt..that woulda coulda is useless.

    Nadal became professional before Murray so again..thats a woulda coulda.

    But I do bet that Murrays career is longer than Nadals....at 23 his knees and feet are buggered.

  • how can the count as slams that he's participated in if he didnt play in them!!!! murray will come good.

  • im so tired about this NADAL WASNT AROUND !!!!! for godsake ....get over nadal fans !!!!!! nadal was in roland garros and roger won it !!!!! nadal has played in a high level since 2004 or 2005 and roger has won till then at least 10 GRAND SLAM !!!!!! so with or without nadal roger is the one who dominate tennis !!!!! get it now ...nadal fans ???!!!!
  • Comment removed

  • At last a fellow youtuber who talks a little sense. You're right, Nadal was not good enough this year to beat Soderling at the French who Federer later on destroyed. Fed deserved it. I would still agree though Nadal is the one of the greatest on clay and i doubt Fed will win French again.

  • i love both players but i gotta agree with you fed had just as much chance of losing in the earlier rounds as nadal did. Fed has definetly deserved the title of GOAT although he isnt dominating as much as back in 05-07 hes still the most dominant figure in tennis =P whether hes better than nadal remains to be seen but its the grandslam titles that matter so in that regard fed will probally stay GOAT

  • haha i love roger

  • federer is da best

  • Andy Murray has never won a slam indeed and probably never will because he is British, and here in Britain we have a massive fucking annoying habit of overhyping & overexposing any sportsman/woman to death and thus sucking the life out of them.

  • Comment removed

  • game federer!

  • Federer 1million times better than nadal!

  • hes a little better than nadal, doesnt play like it. but the gap is almost close nadal is almost 23 and closing faster than ever before

  • Comment removed

  • I agree with U

  • Playing Nadal and Federer in best of 5 is totally different to playing them in ATP events....

    Murray has only beaten Nadal once in 5 set match (US Open) and he's never beaten Fed in a 5set match...

    Wimbledon will be interesting...but I just can't see Murray beating Nadal AND Federer in the same slam...(which of course he will have to if he wants to win the tournament!!)

  • you have to remember that it might be the one tournament where a big portion of the crowd are against both Nadal AND Fed in most of their games

  • err... nop murray did not beat nadal in 5 sets he beat him in 4 US Open 2008

    6-2, 7-6(5), 4-6, 6-4

  • yea, but best of 5 sets ;)

  • unless, hopefully federer and nadal draw each other, but i still dnt think he will win wimbledon

  • HAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! fag, you know nothing about tennis, so shut the fuck up.

  • I know plenty about tennis batty, but the difference is i dnt know anything about gay burlesque houses or foreskins like you do

  • If you automatically think of that, you must have it on your mind

  • Thats cus u remind me of it dnt u queer. Cmon no-one on here likes u, ur comment got a -8, so wots the point clown?

  • lol, funny. Cuz everyone on this video are Federer cock suckers like yourself

  • Uno wot else is funny, i never sed that i liked federer knob cheese, so go back to your hand shuffle over gay porn

  • DID YOU JUST CALL ME KNOB CHEESE?

    HAHAHAHA!!!!! thats great

  • lol... fed won wimbledon andy roddick beat andy murray.... =) kthxbai

  • "LOL LOL I'm JunYong55, I'm a stupid asian fuck who thinks I know everything about tennis LOL LOL=)=)!"

    dumb fuck

  • lol... im usmeagle91 i'm a little 9 year old boy talking shit to a guy who was just stating the facts... i have no real wit so i just curse them out , i have no idea what a im saying so i spout racsist comments because they sound insulting LOLOL =))

    p.s usmeagle91 can u prove me wrong that fed didnt win wimby or that andy roddick didnt beat andy murray? if u cant then keep quiet child=)

  • Haha child... that's great.

    I'm the child yet you're the one who writes like a 4th grader. Andy Roddick beating Murray doesn't mean anything. Murray in head to head leads 6-3. Oh, and guess what, Murray leads Federer 6-3 head to head. Murray has only been playing this good for about a year. Fed's been playing this good for 6 years.

    Time to go back to working in your rice fields bud.

  • yea its so great right? the fact that murray leads roddick in the h2h yet, he loses to him when it counts the most. so incredible right? im not saying murray sucks i was just stating the facts sorry that you dont understand english. come talk to me when you can read a bit better =)

  • You're a hypocrite.

    When did I ever say Fed or Roddick sucks? The only thing you've said is that Roddick beat Murray, yet Murray leads 6-3.

    This all comes down to the fact that Fed doesn't think Murray should be considered one of the favorites to win a grand slam because he's never won one himself. Going into the Austrailian Open, Murray had been playing the best of the top 4.

  • once again im sorry that u didnt read my first post i was talking about the results and roddick did beat murray in the semis of wimby. and yes murray has been playing well yet he always seems to come up short during the slams. and fed does have a right to believe that murray should not be the favorite. no matter how well he played up to the AO he still hasnt proved that he can win a slam.

  • I never said THE favorite, I said ONE of the favorites. Fed and Nadal are automatically going to be the favorites, but Murray's record deserves to be right up there with them.

  • Your circumcised then?

  • It's surprising to see Andy as a favorite in the AO. But tell you what, there will be no surprise if Andy is the favorite for Wimbledon instead of Roger, at least locally

  • fukin nadal bumboy

  • lol, I hate Nadal u fuckin' loser

  • why the fuck r u sucking his dick then?

  • lol, who the fuck do you think you are you cocksucker?

  • noob u got owned =) fed is 15 murray is still zero... sorry kthxbai

  • disagree tbf ;p

  • rafa clearly shows a long era of dominance, knowing that he uses an unorthodox grip-western and he's a lefty. federer's strategy is to attack the forehand. its his mindset. when matched against nadal, he is forced to think otherwise or to just do what he's trained to, which is attack the forehand, which in turn is nadal's defensive backhand. and nadal also has great athleticism.

  • soooooo happy murray lost to nadal in indian wells. i can't STAND him. clearly rafa was injured in rotterdam and that's why murray won. he was so easily dispatched of in california...

    funny really.

  • Comment removed

  • *** Ohworldgirl1***

    There's ALWAYS a RIGHT TIME and PLACE for everything. In sports, winning and loosing is part of it. Its how you handle the HIGH's ( fame, money) and the LOW's ( loosing, injury ) thats separate you from the rest of the pack. It woot makes you a MATURE, TRUE, CLASS champ.

  • *** Ohworldgirl1 ***

    "ARGUING, HUSTLING, HARASSING people in any shape, matter or form, whether you hustle them here on this vid or harassing them on their channel by leaving messages is like competing in the SPECIAL OLYMPICS, whether you win or lose, youre still ( and always will be ) retarded !"

    Lets get real and Im sure you'll get over it!

    Im moving right along.

  • i also think he showed a fair point, since it was proved when murray lost to verdasco in the 4th round. all federer did was make a prediction, so people who hate federer at least give him some credit.

  • federer is showing class by being honest. based on this video he sed he was suprised and supports his view anaylsing last year, but he never sed murray dint stand a chance. everyone is entitled to their own opinion, it is classy to be honest, its only rude if they are insulting opponents by making a couple of unasked for remarks. Saying he was suprised is hardly an insult. Murray just took it way too personally, and i dint think he reli should have cared that much.

  • He wasn't insulting Andy. He made a fair point. I'm a Murray fan but I have to admit it's a bit strange to make a person who's never won a slam, a favourite over guys like Nads and Feds who have won many.

    I don't think Andy was offended.

  • Andy dare not be offended... he doesnt have a right to be offended till he seriously wins a SLAM

    I dont like federer any more at all .. but hten I guess if nadals not around then id like federer to win ...

    Altho I prefer nadal any dayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

  • You're right. Good point!

  • let's see how nadal will handle that when the next number one comes along!he's also an emotional guy which is a good thing!

    first of all he's got to prove that he can stay in the number one position as long as roger did!

    but i still hope that roger comes back one more time before he retires!

  • I doubt that Raphael Nadal can retain the number one ranking like Roger Federer. Federer did something that is virtually impossible during the Open Era by retaining the number one spot for a bit longer than five years without losing it once. Pete Sampras had a record by ending the season as number one for six seasons in a row; however Sampras lost his number one ranking to the likes of Agassi and Rafter throughout the time, only to recover it before the season ended.

  • This is NOT d 1st time "SISSY", "CRY BABY" cried !

    He cried cause he cant beat Nalbandian in 1 Master event, David was serving 4 d matched & he started crying !! RF was ranked #1 then.

    He, again, cried when he cant beat Tim Henman in again, 1 master event! Again, he was ranked #1.

    He won MULTIPLE GS tennis, except the FRENCh. He has a $45M in prize money & edorsement deal last yr. Winning/Loosing is part of being an athlete, its how you handle d lost makes a difference. GOAT & egos.

  • You people always talking about crying in sports are ridiculous. GET REAL already - you must be blind as a bat if you've never seen men cry in sports. Federer cried - so (fckn) what? He's a warrior, a champion and shedding a freaking tear isn't going to lose the dominant record he retains - or erase the titles he's won. Men Crying and sports go together like popcorn and butter - What the hell's the matter with you people?

  • You're right. It shows how commited and passionate he is about his tennis. Respect to Feds. Winning is important to him. That's why he's a winner!

  • whole world has a wrong opinion about men crying,.. It doesn't make u sissy ,.. U just have to realize that a man shouldn't cry when he is in a fight or something 'physically' is hurting him,.. but from that came the thing that man cannot cry on phylogical basis ??? I totally respect that,.. that means that he has to deal with alot more than nadal during the match,... that makes him even greater,..to know that he is not a machine who was slamming for over 4 -5 years,..but a real man...

  • Thats true. But Fedrer got a much to big ego. But you have to have that to be one of the worlds best sportsmen, i would think

  • Roger Federer cried because he doesn't like loosing, second place to him is the first looser the great roger has high standards^^

  • i just think the crowd chanting "i love you" and the whole situation got to him. i don't think he cried cause lost b/c that's WEAK. i think he cried b/c his game broke down in the 5th set, he was on a hard court (where he's supposed to be better than nadal) and rafa STILL beat him.

    he knows now that raf's in his head & he's just not the better player against him any more. those are things that would make me cry if i were roger federer, former #1 player and once thought of as the best ever.

  • I totally agree! LONG LIVE KING ROGER!

  • yeah thats very touching for him huh^_^the crowd! but breaking down in the 5th set and rafa still beat him is the same that he cried because he lost ........ anyways Roger will get Rafa next time

  • League of Extraordinary Gentlemen

  • Murray being announced as fav for this grand slam made me laugh like a madhead....the most stupid thing ever. As for Federer crying, there is nothing wrong with it. He wernt crying cos he got beat, i think there was more to it than that. Especially with the cheering from the crowd, i think that set him off!!!!

  • It was logical due to Murray getting convincingly to the US OPen final (overwhelmened by the moment clearly!), and subsequently beating Fed at the Masters and then again in SE Asia. Fed cried due to the pressure he feels in letting his overwhelming fan-down and the tremendous expectation and hopes placed on him...but winning for him will be less frequent and he will learn patience. Not easy for someone who's used to winning consecutively virtually EVERY season. It's a new language for him.

  • You're notion of what it means to be a "man" is limited. He's more manly for not shedding tears behind closed doors like most "men" do! lol Rafa cried when he publicly when he lost Wimby in '07, Coria at Roland Garros in '04,other players chose to forgo or limite their post match interviews as well, etc. Roger's unique in that he has to balance being a super athlete and overwhelming love from his fans publicly more than most. Also all the energy and emotion pent up needs to be drained after.

  • Where have you been?? Crying is a big part of sports.

    Seriously - what planet have you been on if you say you've NEVER seen a man cry in sports?

  • totally agree with LFiers

  • Sacramones performance was terrible during the olympics and was the reason why Team USA lost. With that kind of performance and still made it to the national team, I wonder how many coaches did she have to sleep with in order to get the spot. Her ass is so fat, I think her ass is at least 20 pounds extra compared to her teammates. That was why she brought down Team USA. Stupid bitch should go to Jenny Craig. Alicia will go down as the worst, and most disgraceful gymnast in Olympic history.

  • What are you on about?

  • It was the fans in the crowd who screamed their love for him that broke him in half. Roger wanted to hold the trophy high for Peter in front of the legends who shaped the game thats given him so much. It was a tall order. Taller than leveling grand slam titles with Sampras. Taller than taking down Nadal. It was the biggest moment Ive seen in his professional career. The loss of the match is nothing for how he showed us the depth of his love for the game and a friend long gone.

  • Some folks say Roger wept for his loss to Nadal. Not a chance. He wept for the occasion as he stood there amongst the legends of Aussie tennis who came to celebrate his match. The men he learned to revere when he was a light footed lad from an adoring man who taught him his great game. A man who was once a friend to them all. Now gone.

  • im a nadal fan but federer shouldnt be criticised for his emotions...i hope he can win his 14th soon....he is a great talent way better than murraytwat or djokobitch.......i hope federer can win wimbledon this year......go fed!but nadal for french hopefully!

  • Rafa showed his class off court too. Fed's tears were real, but still they looked a bit of a show stealing from the winner. Come on, poor Rafa couldn't openly enjoy his win. It seemed a funeral at times!

    By the way, at 22 Rafa has already 6 Grand Slam titles. It bears remembering!

  • Now your honestly the type of fan that tennis truley needs more of!!! Well said, beautifully infact! I totally agree, its an emotional sport, these players they live it, they breathe it, it can be hard, it can be tough, but the strength they have to train come back and fight on is what makes them champions! Im a Fed fan but i totally agree! Nadal is my boy too! I love em both and am blessed that they are here to give us amazing and memorable tennis like this! This is what we need and want!

  • he is ginger i promise...check his videos as a kid...he was orange......hes also a cunt

  • Fed acted like an arrogant prick slagging off Murray and Djokovic when they had done nothing to him. The tears showed his ego was dented he was like a child who couldn't get his own way. In future he should keep his mouth shut and let his tennis do the talking.

  • Arrogant!? What the fuck? Murray was bound to lose anyway lol. But what are you on? Fed has mad respect for Djokovic man did you even listen properly? Fed has plenty of times gave support to Djokovic. Your mad trippin.

  • With that, I'm referring to cric321. What a fuckhead!

  • Oh ofcourse the wanker is, i just gave him a serving in my comment to him cuz people like him have no respect 4 the sport like they just dont get it and im sick of haters of either one when they are the main ones making the sport so amazing and memorable. Its rivalrys like this that breed true competion and fukers like cric321 just dont get it at all. Discrace.

  • murrays a boring ginger cunt.....

  • Nadal OWNS federer now. roger is nadals bunny. FACT. All you fed fans can go suck rogers dick. That might stop him crying any further. What a pussy. Nadal, you are a true champion. Beating roger know is as easy as stealing candy from a kid! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAAH­HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAHHA

  • You must be such a fucking loser.

  • Fans like you are a discrace to tennis 4 real, you act like federer is shit and he is easy to beat!? Shit, why is it that everytime Nadal battles him it is a struggle and goes into a 5 setter and every1 else just fails in comparison to federer? Nadal idolises Federer and agrees he is one of the greatest ever, and you cant!? Shit man im a Fed fan yes, but im also a Nadal fan and i love em both, without either one, tennis would almost be boring cuz there wld be no competition. They both rock!!

  • he isn't ginger but he is a cunt

  • lol. yeah i gotta agree there, well i dont know him to call him a cunt but im not a fan of him. Hes a good player, well awesome in fact to even get into pro tennis and become no4 but i just dont like his boring and often cocky attitude in my opinion. Sorry to his fans but i just havent seen much good to like about him.

  • PEOPLE, PLEASE. Fed's not being arrogant at all. I mean how do you answer a question that practically meant, "How do you feel about people expecting this dude to win the tournament, cause yknow, he's the new favorite now that you're washed up?" with more grace than Federer did? Roger was completely cool about it.

    NO ONE should forget that Fed is THE GREATEST EVER. Especially you, rafa. You're going down today.

  • Man ... your predictive powers suck. Could have waited 3-4 hours to speak of the AO final ...

    Anyhow, I agree Fed is the best ever.

  • federer is a crybaby and even wen not 100% cud beat him,fed's career is overrrrrrrrrrr

  • oh that is soooo not a cool coment. he was emotional, for a damn good reason. he's a ledge. love him!

  • Dunno, where was Murray in the final or in the semis or in the quarters for that matter...

    At least Federer took the champion to five sets.

    Go Rafa/ Fuck Murray

  • Everybody knows the end of the story. Murray crushed out against an amazing Verdasco and even if he had advanced, I don't think he could have taken on Rafa AND Roger in the Final. No chance! It takes a lot more to win one of the 4 Opens, many guys out there have proven to have the class to beat Roger in 2 or 3 sets, not many have succeeded in a 4 or 5. Accept the facts!

  • Im not saying Murray would have won it , Verdasco deserved that win. Im saying that Federer sounded arrogant with that " good for him " comment . That was meant exactly as it sounded . I agree hes the best , and when you have been on top for as long as he has , guess its just human nature to become a little less humble. A shame really.

  • the best player , but getting a bit arrogant

  • yah whata an assclown

  • He was just giving his opinion. He wasn't being arrogant. He said good for him! He also went on to explain some of the best players are in top form. I think putting pressure on Murray will stop him from developing. Arrogant would be Federer saying "WHAT are they SMOKING!?" Btw, Murray is a good player. Not dissing him at all.

  • 13 Grand Slams...

    Are you surprised? Lol.

  • i have a feeling roger gonna win 3 major's this year!!!!

  • Folks, do not forget the age factor. Fed's 27 already while Rafa is 22... and improving -each year he does better on every Grand Slam.

    My doctor has told me to stop watching Nadal's matches on TV. After 5 HOURS today, my heart was just about to stop.