Is it just me, or does the body Chris finds in the morgue in this film bear a strking resemblance to the dead man in Tarkovsky's Stalker? Same hair, same face, just a different expression and setting.
Thisfilm is as 2001 space, stalker, sphere. It not ahit not to return in touch with an extraterrestrial intelligence. Ill involves of meeting himself one.
The comon point between all its film and book it is this incapacity that one had his author to takeout winning ofthis fight against them, to find their freedom.
Tosave its soul it is already necessary to allow to have one of it. In the zone of stalker in the sphere in the monolythe. All that we show you is in us. It is what we name the one.
I really liked this film. I thought it was a Si-Fi at first, but I found it went much deeper than that. For me, I think of Solaris as a window on the soul which forces you to confront your demons. At least that's how I interpreted it. Love the music from the film and this one too.
Great film - philosophiocal, pyschological, and emotionally intense. Despite the superbly nuanced drama, the movie misses a lot of the important ideas in the novel by Stanislaw Lem. The book focuses more on the impossibility of communication between humanity and higher intelligence(s), with direct implications for religions by casting doubt on man's so-called knowledge of their G(g)od(s), and calling into question the nature of the relationship between the two. I want to see Takovsky version
Sorry, didn't realised I stupidly deleted your previous comment! I haven't read Lem's book, but I think a lot of time Hollywood has to sacrifice or alter a books message/content so as to be accessible, unfortunately, but sometimes a good book can make a good film! The Tarkovsky version is a lot bleaker and more intense, I don't have a favorite version, they are both great in my opinion. I recently saw Aronofsky's The Fountain, which also covered the themes of love and loss in an original way.
Is it just me, or does the body Chris finds in the morgue in this film bear a strking resemblance to the dead man in Tarkovsky's Stalker? Same hair, same face, just a different expression and setting.
Darkinsigniosis 1 year ago
good movie but couldnt just be the track somewhere? jega's incredible track
SummerPaPa 1 year ago
good movie but couldnt just be the track somewhere? jega's incredible track
SummerPaPa 1 year ago
this is silent hill goes to solaris
pinkeyegasms 2 years ago
which is this song? please
monkhe0001 2 years ago
haha its inertia by jega, its in the title
DSAdred 2 years ago
awesome video, very nicely done, love the movie.
you know whats strange you managed to put the complete movie into 6minutes
unitedoceanic 2 years ago
reed the book people, read the book!!
grzegorzbas 2 years ago 5
2001 space solaris stalker tell the osame story "the incapacity of the man to meet he even"
All those movies are only highlighting the echec of them authors respective in front of the problem put in spite of them.
It is the meeting of the consciousness with his omniscient driver to whom we cannot lie. It ets the meeting with note unconscious with our one.
These films discuss only superficiality that the human consciousness is not prete to assume. What harms in its ecoute of her even.
aquadiem 2 years ago
Thisfilm is as 2001 space, stalker, sphere. It not ahit not to return in touch with an extraterrestrial intelligence. Ill involves of meeting himself one.
The comon point between all its film and book it is this incapacity that one had his author to takeout winning ofthis fight against them, to find their freedom.
Tosave its soul it is already necessary to allow to have one of it. In the zone of stalker in the sphere in the monolythe. All that we show you is in us. It is what we name the one.
aquadiem 2 years ago
I really liked this film. I thought it was a Si-Fi at first, but I found it went much deeper than that. For me, I think of Solaris as a window on the soul which forces you to confront your demons. At least that's how I interpreted it. Love the music from the film and this one too.
RedSkyHorizon 2 years ago
read the bokk... I mean it...
grzegorzbas 2 years ago
Thank you, this movie is so haunting, the music fantastic.
mospeakeasy 2 years ago 2
Great film - philosophiocal, pyschological, and emotionally intense. Despite the superbly nuanced drama, the movie misses a lot of the important ideas in the novel by Stanislaw Lem. The book focuses more on the impossibility of communication between humanity and higher intelligence(s), with direct implications for religions by casting doubt on man's so-called knowledge of their G(g)od(s), and calling into question the nature of the relationship between the two. I want to see Takovsky version
AbsentDog 2 years ago 3
Sorry, didn't realised I stupidly deleted your previous comment! I haven't read Lem's book, but I think a lot of time Hollywood has to sacrifice or alter a books message/content so as to be accessible, unfortunately, but sometimes a good book can make a good film! The Tarkovsky version is a lot bleaker and more intense, I don't have a favorite version, they are both great in my opinion. I recently saw Aronofsky's The Fountain, which also covered the themes of love and loss in an original way.
jelliscorpio 2 years ago
@AbsentDog This is why I feel if we were to ever make contact with a higher being it should be someone not held back by the constraints of religion.
xXDEICIDE216Xx 7 months ago
Comment removed
AbsentDog 2 years ago
jega fucking rules
kakface12 3 years ago
One of my fave films, and one of my fave artists. Woo!
chulk607 3 years ago
Death shall have no dominion ...
silversaltfilms 3 years ago 2
Nice cut. I love SOLARIS. It's one of my favourite movie, a masterpiece. :-)
winnetouentertiment 3 years ago 2
Thanks.
jelliscorpio 3 years ago
Jega is amazing but the original Solaris by Tarkovsky remains unbeaten.
ThomasColliers 3 years ago
The Tarkovsky version is great, but I have to be in the right mood to watch it. Very original though.
jelliscorpio 3 years ago