"Peter not the pope" "Christians are masochists". "This land or that land is the Revived Rome." the truth of the matter: to inflict this kind of suffring is wrong; whether it's Nero, or Diocletian, or Torquemada, or Hitler, or Pot Pol. People who die with courage should be honored, whether it's Simon Peter, or Joan of Arc, or Dietrich Bonhoffer, or Ann Franck. How we treat the least of humanity is how we treat the Father in Heaven.
Peter most certainly was the "human rock" on which the Catholic Chruch was built. See youtube.com/watch?v=82aFlmdtRLw&feature=recentlik this will lay to rest any confusion surrounding translations etc.
The apostle Peter was never really the 1st pope.That's pure Catholic fiction.He never went to Rome during his lifetime in the 1st place.
Besides,he was sent by God to preach to the 10 lost tribes of Israel so says the Bible and only the apostle Paul was sent to preach to the gentiles.Simon Magus(the sorcerer)might've been the 1st pope but indirectly.He started a movement with a group of people who didn't hold on to the apostles' beliefs thus with paganism the Catholic church was born.
Is the movie name A.D.. trying to get this movie for years., cant get a copy. would you share it. I really want a copy of this movie. Please. thank you in advance.
There is no proof that Peter even visited Rome and the (Catholic) assertion that the papacy was founded by Jesus is simply not supported in the Bible.
@Sabianfan yeah jesus claimed he was to be the first pope but said it like "you're peter the rock on which i will build my church" something like that
Sorry, but actually Jesus referred to himself in Matthew 16:18 by saying: You are Peter, and on this rock-mass I will build my congregation, Jesus was not using synonymous terms. Even in the Aramaic (Syriac) version the distinction is apparent from a difference in the gender of the particle preceding the word kipha, used for both Peter and rock. The masculine verbal pronoun (hu) precedes Peter, but rock is preceded by the feminine demonstrative adjective (hade).
what????????? what are you taking about? Hade means Hell, wordly "the underworld"! The Bible was wrote in Greek, not in aramaic! and there they used the word PETRA
Umm... Peter was male. How else would a male person be addressed in Syriac,. if not with the masculine word form for "you"? And the Syriac word for "this" (as in "this rock") can't be anything other than feminine, because the word for rock - kipha - is feminine. That's how grammar works. And in Palestinian Aramaic, kepha is masculine! Also, the Syriac New Testament is a translation from the Greek. If Petros and petra.aren't synonymous, why was the same word used to translate both?
Thank you for your reply but, are you sure? I get the impression you got this from Catholic sources that want to support Roman papacy instead of scriptural evidence. Do you really believe Peter was the 1st pope?
@Sabianfan Yes, it is. Remember Jesus always compare a church with a virgin woman and the Roman Catholic Church (not necessarily all the followers) is the Great Whore of Apocalypse who was once okay but with time passes by, all the descendants of Peter began to disband, separate and the one in Rome transformed into a "whore" by changing commandments, inquisition, etc.
Thank you for your comment and uploading this vid endtimetuber. I too am a fan of A.D (look at my vids) but my reply was actually directed to capsule35, who disagrees with my earlier explanation about the Aramaic distinction, so I might as well adress you both.
2/2 The Syriac text has kipha for both “Peter” & “rock,” but “Peter” is preceded by the masculine verbal pronoun (hu) to show that kipha, meaning “Peter,” is masculine, whereas “rock” is preceded by the feminine demonstrative adjective (háde). So this 2nd kipha, meaning “rock,” is feminine. The argument that because in the Aramaic (Syriac) Version the same word kipha is applied to both Peter & the rock, they mean the same person is proved to be false.
The sentence is: "You are kipha, and on this kipha I will build..." Kipha is a feminine noun in Syriac, and so it takes the feminine form of the demonstrative adjective ("this"). Your mistake lies in arguing that the first appearance of kipha in the sentence is somehow masculine, because it is preceded by "hu". But Jesus is addressing the man Simon with "hu", i.e. "You - the man in front of me - are kipha". It is not a feminine noun, but the man Simon, that is being addressed.
I appreciate your input, and of course I'm limited by the fact that I don't speak Syriac, therefor only relying on my sources. Anyway, my actual point (beyond the grammar) is rather: wasn't Jesus applying to himself? Nowhere in scripture you'll find evidence that Peter was put above his fellow-apostles. Peter never makes mention of himself as pope and neither Paul nor any other Bible writer refers to any primacy of Peter.
Put it this way: if you were to speak directly to a rock in Syriac, you would use the feminine form of "you", since kipha is feminine. But if you speak to a man in Syriac and tell him that he is rock, then you must use the masculine form of "you", since you are addressing a male person. In the second example, the word for rock itself is still feminine - but since you are directly addressing the man (masculine), rather than the rock (feminine), the masculine form is employed.
It comes from the Mini Series, A.D. that was shown here in North America in 1985...you can purchase it VHS or DVD form if you look online...the VHS version is the longer version..
nero is PIG...
charlie16chaplin 6 months ago
@Xerotaerg Why? The iron age had long passed. Working with steel was a fairly mature technology by then
eamonnca1 7 months ago
Pitbulls didn't exist at that time.
Christians were fed to the lions by the crazy emperor Nero.
comali2212 8 months ago
@comali2212 Yeah, the pitbulls were not around in those times. And christians and jews where fed to the lions.
Pikminlinkfan23 8 months ago
@comali2212 no those are neaopolitan mastiffs by which the romans would use in combat to scare horses
Vlaxerman343 7 months ago
Does anyone know what movie this is from
MrBingie 8 months ago
What happened to the children?!
AMY1213141 10 months ago
"Peter not the pope" "Christians are masochists". "This land or that land is the Revived Rome." the truth of the matter: to inflict this kind of suffring is wrong; whether it's Nero, or Diocletian, or Torquemada, or Hitler, or Pot Pol. People who die with courage should be honored, whether it's Simon Peter, or Joan of Arc, or Dietrich Bonhoffer, or Ann Franck. How we treat the least of humanity is how we treat the Father in Heaven.
wrybreadspread 10 months ago
Peter most certainly was the "human rock" on which the Catholic Chruch was built. See youtube.com/watch?v=82aFlmdtRLw&feature=recentlik this will lay to rest any confusion surrounding translations etc.
mmmail1969 1 year ago
@mmmail1969 different peter. it was the sorcerer
Cool2fool 11 months ago
@Cool2fool - go bore some other poor bunch of fellow idiots with your ego driven theobable!
mmmail1969 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fuck jesus
phillies4100 1 year ago
@phillies4100 Your words will condemn you....
HeavenBound2323 1 year ago
The disciple respects his master so much that he wants to out-suffer him. Talk about the raging sado-masochism inherent in Judeo-christianity.
trent8002003 1 year ago
The apostle Peter was never really the 1st pope.That's pure Catholic fiction.He never went to Rome during his lifetime in the 1st place.
Besides,he was sent by God to preach to the 10 lost tribes of Israel so says the Bible and only the apostle Paul was sent to preach to the gentiles.Simon Magus(the sorcerer)might've been the 1st pope but indirectly.He started a movement with a group of people who didn't hold on to the apostles' beliefs thus with paganism the Catholic church was born.
boyjay4utube 1 year ago
@boyjay4utube So the part of the Bible where Peter went to the Roman governors house meant what?
clarkbailey1973 1 year ago
the guy with the trident looks like Alan Rickman
branie99 1 year ago
Is the movie name A.D.. trying to get this movie for years., cant get a copy. would you share it. I really want a copy of this movie. Please. thank you in advance.
stanlylouis 1 year ago
This video is made by the protestant church = criminals. You should be working on how you defend your Christian faith from muslisms invasion, stupid.
melkisadeki 1 year ago
children dressed as sheep to be torn alive....massochistic!!!
Eskimop16 1 year ago
the best filme
TheVergolino 2 years ago 2
To @inferneko Because Your reference Bible king james is full of misinterpretations which means
this bible is not a reputable reference.Better
refer to The Greek bible
codie2nd 2 years ago 3
the children dressed as lambs....sick.....
Eskimop16 2 years ago 3
what a way to die for a first pope
inferneko 2 years ago
@inferneko
Peter the first pope ?
Was he ??
There is no proof that Peter even visited Rome and the (Catholic) assertion that the papacy was founded by Jesus is simply not supported in the Bible.
Sabianfan 2 years ago
@Sabianfan yeah jesus claimed he was to be the first pope but said it like "you're peter the rock on which i will build my church" something like that
Eskimop16 2 years ago 2
@Eskimop16
Sorry, but actually Jesus referred to himself in Matthew 16:18 by saying: You are Peter, and on this rock-mass I will build my congregation, Jesus was not using synonymous terms. Even in the Aramaic (Syriac) version the distinction is apparent from a difference in the gender of the particle preceding the word kipha, used for both Peter and rock. The masculine verbal pronoun (hu) precedes Peter, but rock is preceded by the feminine demonstrative adjective (hade).
Sabianfan 2 years ago 6
what????????? what are you taking about? Hade means Hell, wordly "the underworld"! The Bible was wrote in Greek, not in aramaic! and there they used the word PETRA
YHWHICHTHYS 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@YHWHICHTHY
>Hade means Hell, wordly "the underworld"!
Hade ?? I think you mean the Greek word Hades. I know what it means.
>The Bible was wrote in Greek, not in aramaic!
Sorry, but you're wrong. Just google "original languages of the Bible" and you'll find Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek!
> and there they used the word PETRA
I don't reject the use of the word "petra", but Peter did not misinterpret Jesus words nor did he claim to be the rock-mass. Just read1 Peter 2:4-10.
Sabianfan 2 years ago
@Sabianfan
Umm... Peter was male. How else would a male person be addressed in Syriac,. if not with the masculine word form for "you"? And the Syriac word for "this" (as in "this rock") can't be anything other than feminine, because the word for rock - kipha - is feminine. That's how grammar works. And in Palestinian Aramaic, kepha is masculine! Also, the Syriac New Testament is a translation from the Greek. If Petros and petra.aren't synonymous, why was the same word used to translate both?
capsule35 1 year ago
@capsule35
Thank you for your reply but, are you sure? I get the impression you got this from Catholic sources that want to support Roman papacy instead of scriptural evidence. Do you really believe Peter was the 1st pope?
Sabianfan 1 year ago
@Sabianfan Yes, it is. Remember Jesus always compare a church with a virgin woman and the Roman Catholic Church (not necessarily all the followers) is the Great Whore of Apocalypse who was once okay but with time passes by, all the descendants of Peter began to disband, separate and the one in Rome transformed into a "whore" by changing commandments, inquisition, etc.
endtimetuber 1 year ago
1/2 @endtimetuber & capsule 35
Thank you for your comment and uploading this vid endtimetuber. I too am a fan of A.D (look at my vids) but my reply was actually directed to capsule35, who disagrees with my earlier explanation about the Aramaic distinction, so I might as well adress you both.
Sabianfan 1 year ago
2/2 The Syriac text has kipha for both “Peter” & “rock,” but “Peter” is preceded by the masculine verbal pronoun (hu) to show that kipha, meaning “Peter,” is masculine, whereas “rock” is preceded by the feminine demonstrative adjective (háde). So this 2nd kipha, meaning “rock,” is feminine. The argument that because in the Aramaic (Syriac) Version the same word kipha is applied to both Peter & the rock, they mean the same person is proved to be false.
Sabianfan 1 year ago
@Sabianfan Hi
The sentence is: "You are kipha, and on this kipha I will build..." Kipha is a feminine noun in Syriac, and so it takes the feminine form of the demonstrative adjective ("this"). Your mistake lies in arguing that the first appearance of kipha in the sentence is somehow masculine, because it is preceded by "hu". But Jesus is addressing the man Simon with "hu", i.e. "You - the man in front of me - are kipha". It is not a feminine noun, but the man Simon, that is being addressed.
capsule35 1 year ago
@capsule35
I appreciate your input, and of course I'm limited by the fact that I don't speak Syriac, therefor only relying on my sources. Anyway, my actual point (beyond the grammar) is rather: wasn't Jesus applying to himself? Nowhere in scripture you'll find evidence that Peter was put above his fellow-apostles. Peter never makes mention of himself as pope and neither Paul nor any other Bible writer refers to any primacy of Peter.
Sabianfan 1 year ago
@Sabianfan 2/2
Put it this way: if you were to speak directly to a rock in Syriac, you would use the feminine form of "you", since kipha is feminine. But if you speak to a man in Syriac and tell him that he is rock, then you must use the masculine form of "you", since you are addressing a male person. In the second example, the word for rock itself is still feminine - but since you are directly addressing the man (masculine), rather than the rock (feminine), the masculine form is employed.
capsule35 1 year ago
@Sabianfan The Word PETROS means small pebble he did NOT describe Peter as a Rock !
BluesHarp60 2 months ago
I loved this series. I have searched for years for a DVD. All the parts are on here, but not in English. Gutted.
Loree35 2 years ago
whoa what is this from?
kungfufreak5 2 years ago
It comes from the Mini Series, A.D. that was shown here in North America in 1985...you can purchase it VHS or DVD form if you look online...the VHS version is the longer version..
Albertanator 2 years ago
From which movie does this excerpt come from ?
- Hubertus045.
Hubertus045 2 years ago