Robbie you are a NASA shill, a stooge, a government sheep. Hope your paycheck is worth the lack of soul you have selling this bullshit. Remember you too are considered a useless eater by the men who are currently planning our species elimination worldwide. Maybe calling you one of the Goy would be best. An animal according to the owners of the planet.
These are the best photos available to date? Its 2010. A kid with a laptop can look at a car sitting on a street anywhere on earth with google and see its a car. They use ""both geostationary and low Earth-orbiting satellites" according to wikipedia. This very specialized satellite built for this very purpose is taking photos in 2009 that are worse than those I saw as a kid in the 60's. Why aren't we being allowed to see? Because the sites don't exist. Hire somebody from Hollywood NASA.
really wow looks like nothing. Just what I thought. Hmmm there are close up pics of the Russian lander/rover but none of the same quality of any any of the lunar landers HHmmmmmmmmm
The evidence of a hoax is crushing. I posted a partial summary of it on a science forum. To see it, google "The Naked Scientist". In the "New Theories" section there's a thread entitled "Did we land on the moon?". The post is on page 15. It's the 7th one from the top.
Robbie you are a NASA shill, a stooge, a government sheep. Hope your paycheck is worth the lack of soul you have selling this bullshit. Remember you too are considered a useless eater by the men who are currently planning our species elimination worldwide. Maybe calling you one of the Goy would be best. An animal according to the owners of the planet.
angstotheclown 1 year ago
@angstotheclown Dude. Shut up. You're ruining a good video.
BTW geostationary satellites don't have good enough resolution to tell cars. So lay off the wiki, it's not gonna make up for your lack of education.
FantasticBob7000 1 year ago
These are the best photos available to date? Its 2010. A kid with a laptop can look at a car sitting on a street anywhere on earth with google and see its a car. They use ""both geostationary and low Earth-orbiting satellites" according to wikipedia. This very specialized satellite built for this very purpose is taking photos in 2009 that are worse than those I saw as a kid in the 60's. Why aren't we being allowed to see? Because the sites don't exist. Hire somebody from Hollywood NASA.
angstotheclown 1 year ago
really wow looks like nothing. Just what I thought. Hmmm there are close up pics of the Russian lander/rover but none of the same quality of any any of the lunar landers HHmmmmmmmmm
orange70383 1 year ago
This is great stuff! Do you have any plans to do the same type of videos for the other five landing sites? That would be outstanding if you did!
CusterApollo 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The evidence of a hoax is crushing. I posted a partial summary of it on a science forum. To see it, google "The Naked Scientist". In the "New Theories" section there's a thread entitled "Did we land on the moon?". The post is on page 15. It's the 7th one from the top.
Cosmored3 2 years ago
These are the best LRO photos to date.
ptraiders40 2 years ago
"Outstanding!"
Awesome footage.
Rob260259 2 years ago