Added: 2 years ago
From: Shinn5Asuka
Views: 28,928
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (102)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why don't the cryengine and the unrealengine hook up all ready?

  • r u stupid. look. UNREAL engine 3. its UNREALl!!!!! LOL

  • You can't judge these engines by these pictures.

    you can't say it has better lighting in Crytek if all you see is how some guy set it up.

    I've seen realistic lighting in Unreal 3 Tech Demos, I saw one where it was raining at night and you could see a warped refraction of the Neon Lights in the wet street Pavement and I was walking home in the Rain and saw that in real Life and I was like "Hey, it looks like the unreal 3 demo I saw"

  • cryengine is a joke who needs that much reallity + unreal engine is better same quality and purly optimized crytek can retire from gaming industry

  • Para ver imágenes busco en google, no en youtube.

  • Video about nothing... So sucks.. So gay..

    

  • hey which is the name of this song

  • sorry for the miss spells

  • i think cry engine because its alot more real witch you real could'nt get from udk because of the robotic theme sure you could chang the guns and people but cry engine is a lot more simpler in that way because you got the realistic people already so cryengine for everyone who wants it easy but who dosent like a alien shooter here and their

  • Michiu Kaku wasn't able to build a lightsaber, but it's easy, as you see!

  • Comment removed

  • The best thing is the UDK !!!!!!!!!!! You must be a boiler goes with the other, 'cause a lot of people realize that the UDK is much better than CryEngine 3, but the CryEngine 3 and better than the UDK in Chart! Got it?

  • Let me explain. Unreal Engine is the second best engine ever made(imo) but the way it works is best for FPS arena based game. The graphic filters usually associated to UE give the engine a true feel of a "futuristic FPS" game, that borders on steampunk. It is also knows that UE is less component hungry. Its counterpart Cry engine, requires serious PC power and is associated with open world scenery, as it's potential is most evident. Filters associated render the scenery closer to realism.

  • where can i buy this lightsaber .....oh......it's the dislike bar

  • @swswsws100 HAHAHA you've must thought about that for ages.

  • I want to see CryEngine 3/2 DX11/10 vs Unreal Engine 3 DX11 vs Frostbite 2 DX11

  • booth are great but nothing beats cryengine's lighting and water, the only worthy competitor that even beats cryengine in some areas is frostengine(3 or 2, cant remember lol)

  • @1499Erick Frostbite. Not frostengine. LOL

  • CryEngine 3 is the best (to me) because it has realistic graphics and crap like that UnrealEngine 3 is good but it just doesn't seem realistic it looks fake, maybe if they changed it to look real I'd say it'd most likely be a tie between them..

  • lighting in CryEngine... no engine in the world is better

  • @BritishNathan Frost Bite 2.0 > Cry Engine 3. However Cry Engine 2 has really good lighting.

  • @BritishNathan

    I disagree, the 4A and x-Ray engines have far superior lighting systems.

  • Not FAIR!!..lol..You used Gears of War I as an Unreal Engine 3 format-NOT TRUE, that game used the UNREAL ENGINE 2!! Should have used the game: BULLET STORM as a show of how the UNREAL ENGINE 3 IS REALLY LIKE!!..lol..Epic games is coming out with URE 4 soon which will blow the socks off of everything...

  • @jackmarsilva Gears of War used Unreal Engine 3. All of the Gears of War games did.

    Unreal Engine 3 is beautiful, but nobody is using its full potential. Epic them selves showed what it was capable of in the Samaritan demo, but all products using UE3 still look like something that could easily have come out 4 years ago. Crysis is not even that impressive anymore.

  • Silly you, half of the work you see there is by the artists.

    Also which one is easier to mod? which one runs faster? Sound? Cross-platform compatibility?

    Next time don't just compare lousy screenshots.

  • the dislike bar says everything..

  • CRYENGINE IS WINNER!!!!!

  • @GhoSTrunner0123

    CryEngine isn't optimized and get's really laggy even if your computer meets the requirements.

    Taking a bit time making a game with Unreal Engine you can get the same quality with optimized performance.

  • frostbite 2 4ever

  • If you're going to compare game engines, use the SAME assets, with the SAME textures. with the SAME quality settings. You prove NOTHING with still screen shots with a nice musical tone.

  • turks made cryengine

  • The problem I have with the Unreal 3 Engine is that it has some serious aliasing issues, and this is apparent for practically any game that you make in it. I mean, you could be running 2x580s in SLI and turn up every graphical feature to 11, and it would still have a very rough and jagged look to it.

  • every game engine is different so you cannot that cryengine is better because its all different its just what people better work with so you cannot make a vid with cryengine vs unrealengine its both differen if it was almost the same than it was ok but not as its really different from eatch other so....

  • minecraft engine

  • @NaturalWorldWiki it is a java engine not so epic graphics or enhanced but the game by it self is awsome

  • is not

  • Comment removed

  • you are not comparing engines you are comparing art assets rendered by a game engine

  • @demonhuntevo exactly, cant say it better

  • @demonhuntevo Well.. What about the lighting and water effects? I do agree, though. With pictures, all you're comparing is static environments.

  • who is the song? men

  • Well this is all bullshit. Pictures didn't show anything. AND have you seen what unreal engine can do? That's a way better than cryengine.(example samaritan demo)

  • @GameProMaker yeah, sure. CryEngine 3 for the win.

  • @GameProMaker that pre rendered stuff cannot compare to real time in my face graphics in an open world

  • @lordmasterization it's running real time.... On 3 top quality graphics cards.

  • @GameProMaker and doctored to make sure you dont see imperfections, I want to see it running in a game. I have nothing against Unreal engine though. It runs Gears 3 and It looks amazing. But again Unreal is linear, it cannot power high res textures or destruction or large maps.

  • @lordmasterization /watch?v=-m4pe6UAS2M This shows some about Unreal engine.

  • @GameProMaker I saw this already. But again it is showcasing closed environments and good visuals. They are not nearing photorelism like Cryengine is.

  • Stopped images can't tell much my friend. Not in games.

  • You have no idea about what are you presenting.

  • Or more like CryEngine 2 vs Unreal Engine 3

  • But have their plus

  • Alright Cryengine graphics better but they run like shit.

  • Unreal Engine 3: 2007r

    CryEngine 3: 2011r

  • you cant compare the two because they are both different styles of graphics

  • If you want to compare both engines, get them to render the exact same scene.

    Plus graphics is not the only thing that counts, you suck at comparisons. :P

  • I know the more look Real is CryEngine 3!!!

  • @TheJokesterVideos

    Samaritan IS UE4 idiot.

  • a lot of this has to do with the modeling and texture work they are given

  • What a shitty comparison. CryEngine 3 stomps all over UE3, UE4 might put up a bit of a fight though.

  • u got any from frostbite 2?

  • Suddenly Mirror's Edge.

    C2 is nothing but a 0 depth blurfest, with all blur and post-processing off, in comparison.

  • Unreal engine 4 is 5x time's better than cryengine 3

  • @AllenFG86 nah!

  • CryEngine 3 will be better in quality and performance than even UnrealEngine 5

  • Cryengine but the guy needs more inprovment to keep up.

  • name of song?

  • comparing engines doesn't work like this.

  • Both game engines look amazing this gen, and will look amazing next gen with DX11 by their sides.

  • cryengine 3 without doubt

  • cryengine 3 ofc .... its years beyond !

  • whats the background music?

  • CryEngine 3= 2010

    UnrealEngine 3= 2006

    UnrealEngine 3 Rulz

  • FAIL

  • well we didn't even need a comparison to know which one's better

  • Unreal is clay engine 3!!

  • Comment removed

  • OK, Crysis looks better. But is it coded as good as the first ? If yes, I'd never buy that.

    Crysis runs at 50 FPS with a GTX 280. WTF ?!

    All I can say is that UnrealEngine 4 will shit on everyone's neck.

  • @Dreadlockyx play the demo ... the code in crysis 2 is better !

  • wow this video is sooo fail....

  • wtf are those effects for. And constantly showing that same ground comparisation.

    You FAIL!

  • cryengine 3 will be begging it's use on crysis 2

  • well both seem AWSOME!!!

  • There isn't Cry Engine 3, is CE 2...

  • @KiLeTheKiLLa

    cryengine 3 is!!

    its just not out yet, but visually its the same as cryengine 2

  • @thewhitezombie666 I Mean in the video .-.

    In the video is only CE 2, I have already seen the Crysis 2 Videos, Trailers, e.t.c

    and them are different.

  • @KiLeTheKiLLa

    your a dumbass,yes there is,cryengine 3 is for crysis 2

  • Cryengine 3 > Unreal Engine 3

  • But this cant be real...

  • ...... cryengine2 .....

    ...

    Love it

  • That was a mix between CryEngine 2 and 3 vs Unreal Engine 3...

    But, both engines are great in their own way. Unreal Engine 3 is designed to offer good graphics at good performance and outstanding gameplay. And the CryEngine 2 is made mostly for outstanding graphics.

    I prefer both :>

  • Both game engines are great, but I prefer better the CryEngine3

  • those first screens are from cryengine 2 ....

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more