you can't say it has better lighting in Crytek if all you see is how some guy set it up.
I've seen realistic lighting in Unreal 3 Tech Demos, I saw one where it was raining at night and you could see a warped refraction of the Neon Lights in the wet street Pavement and I was walking home in the Rain and saw that in real Life and I was like "Hey, it looks like the unreal 3 demo I saw"
i think cry engine because its alot more real witch you real could'nt get from udk because of the robotic theme sure you could chang the guns and people but cry engine is a lot more simpler in that way because you got the realistic people already so cryengine for everyone who wants it easy but who dosent like a alien shooter here and their
A real comparison can only be made like this: a model environment is choosen, perhaps it's defined by concept art or a photograph. Then, with both development kits, the best available artists will attempt recreating the given model environment with the wanted lighting situation.
The best thing is the UDK !!!!!!!!!!! You must be a boiler goes with the other, 'cause a lot of people realize that the UDK is much better than CryEngine 3, but the CryEngine 3 and better than the UDK in Chart! Got it?
Let me explain. Unreal Engine is the second best engine ever made(imo) but the way it works is best for FPS arena based game. The graphic filters usually associated to UE give the engine a true feel of a "futuristic FPS" game, that borders on steampunk. It is also knows that UE is less component hungry. Its counterpart Cry engine, requires serious PC power and is associated with open world scenery, as it's potential is most evident. Filters associated render the scenery closer to realism.
booth are great but nothing beats cryengine's lighting and water, the only worthy competitor that even beats cryengine in some areas is frostengine(3 or 2, cant remember lol)
CryEngine 3 is the best (to me) because it has realistic graphics and crap like that UnrealEngine 3 is good but it just doesn't seem realistic it looks fake, maybe if they changed it to look real I'd say it'd most likely be a tie between them..
Not FAIR!!..lol..You used Gears of War I as an Unreal Engine 3 format-NOT TRUE, that game used the UNREAL ENGINE 2!! Should have used the game: BULLET STORM as a show of how the UNREAL ENGINE 3 IS REALLY LIKE!!..lol..Epic games is coming out with URE 4 soon which will blow the socks off of everything...
@jackmarsilva Gears of War used Unreal Engine 3. All of the Gears of War games did.
Unreal Engine 3 is beautiful, but nobody is using its full potential. Epic them selves showed what it was capable of in the Samaritan demo, but all products using UE3 still look like something that could easily have come out 4 years ago. Crysis is not even that impressive anymore.
If you're going to compare game engines, use the SAME assets, with the SAME textures. with the SAME quality settings. You prove NOTHING with still screen shots with a nice musical tone.
The problem I have with the Unreal 3 Engine is that it has some serious aliasing issues, and this is apparent for practically any game that you make in it. I mean, you could be running 2x580s in SLI and turn up every graphical feature to 11, and it would still have a very rough and jagged look to it.
every game engine is different so you cannot that cryengine is better because its all different its just what people better work with so you cannot make a vid with cryengine vs unrealengine its both differen if it was almost the same than it was ok but not as its really different from eatch other so....
Well this is all bullshit. Pictures didn't show anything. AND have you seen what unreal engine can do? That's a way better than cryengine.(example samaritan demo)
@GameProMaker and doctored to make sure you dont see imperfections, I want to see it running in a game. I have nothing against Unreal engine though. It runs Gears 3 and It looks amazing. But again Unreal is linear, it cannot power high res textures or destruction or large maps.
@GameProMaker I saw this already. But again it is showcasing closed environments and good visuals. They are not nearing photorelism like Cryengine is.
That was a mix between CryEngine 2 and 3 vs Unreal Engine 3...
But, both engines are great in their own way. Unreal Engine 3 is designed to offer good graphics at good performance and outstanding gameplay. And the CryEngine 2 is made mostly for outstanding graphics.
Why don't the cryengine and the unrealengine hook up all ready?
BabyfacefreakLAMA 4 days ago
r u stupid. look. UNREAL engine 3. its UNREALl!!!!! LOL
az0997711 6 days ago
You can't judge these engines by these pictures.
you can't say it has better lighting in Crytek if all you see is how some guy set it up.
I've seen realistic lighting in Unreal 3 Tech Demos, I saw one where it was raining at night and you could see a warped refraction of the Neon Lights in the wet street Pavement and I was walking home in the Rain and saw that in real Life and I was like "Hey, it looks like the unreal 3 demo I saw"
commodore256 1 week ago
cryengine is a joke who needs that much reallity + unreal engine is better same quality and purly optimized crytek can retire from gaming industry
ghostpinguin 1 week ago
Para ver imágenes busco en google, no en youtube.
yllelder 2 weeks ago
Video about nothing... So sucks.. So gay..
JekopFrest 2 weeks ago 2
hey which is the name of this song
son1049 2 weeks ago
sorry for the miss spells
xXminecraftfreakXx12 3 weeks ago
i think cry engine because its alot more real witch you real could'nt get from udk because of the robotic theme sure you could chang the guns and people but cry engine is a lot more simpler in that way because you got the realistic people already so cryengine for everyone who wants it easy but who dosent like a alien shooter here and their
xXminecraftfreakXx12 3 weeks ago
Michiu Kaku wasn't able to build a lightsaber, but it's easy, as you see!
silkroad54541 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A real comparison can only be made like this: a model environment is choosen, perhaps it's defined by concept art or a photograph. Then, with both development kits, the best available artists will attempt recreating the given model environment with the wanted lighting situation.
ArchonExMachina 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
ArchonExMachina 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
ArchonExMachina 3 weeks ago
The best thing is the UDK !!!!!!!!!!! You must be a boiler goes with the other, 'cause a lot of people realize that the UDK is much better than CryEngine 3, but the CryEngine 3 and better than the UDK in Chart! Got it?
Caio93245 3 weeks ago
Let me explain. Unreal Engine is the second best engine ever made(imo) but the way it works is best for FPS arena based game. The graphic filters usually associated to UE give the engine a true feel of a "futuristic FPS" game, that borders on steampunk. It is also knows that UE is less component hungry. Its counterpart Cry engine, requires serious PC power and is associated with open world scenery, as it's potential is most evident. Filters associated render the scenery closer to realism.
Kserijaro 1 month ago
where can i buy this lightsaber .....oh......it's the dislike bar
swswsws100 1 month ago 14
@swswsws100 HAHAHA you've must thought about that for ages.
DJRefive 1 month ago
I want to see CryEngine 3/2 DX11/10 vs Unreal Engine 3 DX11 vs Frostbite 2 DX11
Pro1337Sn1px0r 1 month ago
booth are great but nothing beats cryengine's lighting and water, the only worthy competitor that even beats cryengine in some areas is frostengine(3 or 2, cant remember lol)
1499Erick 1 month ago
@1499Erick Frostbite. Not frostengine. LOL
TransparentToy1993 1 month ago
CryEngine 3 is the best (to me) because it has realistic graphics and crap like that UnrealEngine 3 is good but it just doesn't seem realistic it looks fake, maybe if they changed it to look real I'd say it'd most likely be a tie between them..
RebelSoldier36 1 month ago
lighting in CryEngine... no engine in the world is better
BritishNathan 1 month ago 11
@BritishNathan Frost Bite 2.0 > Cry Engine 3. However Cry Engine 2 has really good lighting.
kingplutoxiao1 1 week ago
@BritishNathan
I disagree, the 4A and x-Ray engines have far superior lighting systems.
pigeggs1 5 days ago
Not FAIR!!..lol..You used Gears of War I as an Unreal Engine 3 format-NOT TRUE, that game used the UNREAL ENGINE 2!! Should have used the game: BULLET STORM as a show of how the UNREAL ENGINE 3 IS REALLY LIKE!!..lol..Epic games is coming out with URE 4 soon which will blow the socks off of everything...
jackmarsilva 2 months ago
@jackmarsilva Gears of War used Unreal Engine 3. All of the Gears of War games did.
Unreal Engine 3 is beautiful, but nobody is using its full potential. Epic them selves showed what it was capable of in the Samaritan demo, but all products using UE3 still look like something that could easily have come out 4 years ago. Crysis is not even that impressive anymore.
Rambowjo2 1 month ago
Silly you, half of the work you see there is by the artists.
Also which one is easier to mod? which one runs faster? Sound? Cross-platform compatibility?
Next time don't just compare lousy screenshots.
MrDimwit646 2 months ago
the dislike bar says everything..
IhazinternetzXD 2 months ago
CRYENGINE IS WINNER!!!!!
GhoSTrunner0123 2 months ago
@GhoSTrunner0123
CryEngine isn't optimized and get's really laggy even if your computer meets the requirements.
Taking a bit time making a game with Unreal Engine you can get the same quality with optimized performance.
simpsoncheat 3 weeks ago
frostbite 2 4ever
kikflip1234 2 months ago
If you're going to compare game engines, use the SAME assets, with the SAME textures. with the SAME quality settings. You prove NOTHING with still screen shots with a nice musical tone.
Grashock 2 months ago 2
turks made cryengine
ultranety 2 months ago
The problem I have with the Unreal 3 Engine is that it has some serious aliasing issues, and this is apparent for practically any game that you make in it. I mean, you could be running 2x580s in SLI and turn up every graphical feature to 11, and it would still have a very rough and jagged look to it.
ShadwsofArchonia 2 months ago
every game engine is different so you cannot that cryengine is better because its all different its just what people better work with so you cannot make a vid with cryengine vs unrealengine its both differen if it was almost the same than it was ok but not as its really different from eatch other so....
zorbat5 2 months ago
minecraft engine
NaturalWorldWiki 3 months ago
@NaturalWorldWiki it is a java engine not so epic graphics or enhanced but the game by it self is awsome
Boryspitzanzx 2 months ago
is not
woodssoap 3 months ago
Comment removed
TheKiwiSniper 3 months ago
you are not comparing engines you are comparing art assets rendered by a game engine
demonhuntevo 3 months ago
@demonhuntevo exactly, cant say it better
TheKiwiSniper 3 months ago
@demonhuntevo Well.. What about the lighting and water effects? I do agree, though. With pictures, all you're comparing is static environments.
ShrikeC145 3 weeks ago
who is the song? men
ericksagoga 3 months ago
Well this is all bullshit. Pictures didn't show anything. AND have you seen what unreal engine can do? That's a way better than cryengine.(example samaritan demo)
GameProMaker 3 months ago 2
@GameProMaker yeah, sure. CryEngine 3 for the win.
Tucker1149 3 months ago
@GameProMaker that pre rendered stuff cannot compare to real time in my face graphics in an open world
lordmasterization 1 month ago
@lordmasterization it's running real time.... On 3 top quality graphics cards.
GameProMaker 1 month ago
@GameProMaker and doctored to make sure you dont see imperfections, I want to see it running in a game. I have nothing against Unreal engine though. It runs Gears 3 and It looks amazing. But again Unreal is linear, it cannot power high res textures or destruction or large maps.
lordmasterization 1 month ago
@lordmasterization /watch?v=-m4pe6UAS2M This shows some about Unreal engine.
GameProMaker 1 month ago
@GameProMaker I saw this already. But again it is showcasing closed environments and good visuals. They are not nearing photorelism like Cryengine is.
lordmasterization 1 month ago
Stopped images can't tell much my friend. Not in games.
surfbite 3 months ago
You have no idea about what are you presenting.
YavuzXtr 3 months ago 2
Or more like CryEngine 2 vs Unreal Engine 3
sameq1337 4 months ago
But have their plus
Chooboh 4 months ago
Alright Cryengine graphics better but they run like shit.
DarkIXHoshi 4 months ago
Unreal Engine 3: 2007r
CryEngine 3: 2011r
fornakter 4 months ago
you cant compare the two because they are both different styles of graphics
Dewgsauce 4 months ago
If you want to compare both engines, get them to render the exact same scene.
Plus graphics is not the only thing that counts, you suck at comparisons. :P
Shakeno 4 months ago
I know the more look Real is CryEngine 3!!!
FantasyNero 4 months ago
@TheJokesterVideos
Samaritan IS UE4 idiot.
TheAussieStew 4 months ago
a lot of this has to do with the modeling and texture work they are given
CWScott24 4 months ago
What a shitty comparison. CryEngine 3 stomps all over UE3, UE4 might put up a bit of a fight though.
TheAussieStew 5 months ago
u got any from frostbite 2?
eternyman 5 months ago
Suddenly Mirror's Edge.
C2 is nothing but a 0 depth blurfest, with all blur and post-processing off, in comparison.
arakhnist 5 months ago
Unreal engine 4 is 5x time's better than cryengine 3
AllenFG86 6 months ago
@AllenFG86 nah!
Svenhybbe 5 months ago
CryEngine 3 will be better in quality and performance than even UnrealEngine 5
LazyDorman 6 months ago
Cryengine but the guy needs more inprovment to keep up.
XBOXNationTVHD 7 months ago
name of song?
psycodoood 9 months ago
comparing engines doesn't work like this.
AmokMTag 9 months ago
Both game engines look amazing this gen, and will look amazing next gen with DX11 by their sides.
GridlokShock 10 months ago
cryengine 3 without doubt
mastercheatcomplete 10 months ago
cryengine 3 ofc .... its years beyond !
ast0f 11 months ago
whats the background music?
thunderising93 1 year ago
CryEngine 3= 2010
UnrealEngine 3= 2006
UnrealEngine 3 Rulz
MatiasssLA 1 year ago
FAIL
WiperElite 1 year ago
well we didn't even need a comparison to know which one's better
yourmom654321 1 year ago
Unreal is clay engine 3!!
Thet3 1 year ago
Comment removed
webeglitchin 1 year ago
OK, Crysis looks better. But is it coded as good as the first ? If yes, I'd never buy that.
Crysis runs at 50 FPS with a GTX 280. WTF ?!
All I can say is that UnrealEngine 4 will shit on everyone's neck.
Dreadlockyx 1 year ago
@Dreadlockyx play the demo ... the code in crysis 2 is better !
ast0f 11 months ago
wow this video is sooo fail....
mat967 1 year ago
wtf are those effects for. And constantly showing that same ground comparisation.
You FAIL!
MisterGasMan 1 year ago
cryengine 3 will be begging it's use on crysis 2
asstegos21 1 year ago
well both seem AWSOME!!!
danilovic97 1 year ago 41
There isn't Cry Engine 3, is CE 2...
KiLeTheKiLLa 1 year ago
@KiLeTheKiLLa
cryengine 3 is!!
its just not out yet, but visually its the same as cryengine 2
thewhitezombie666 1 year ago
@thewhitezombie666 I Mean in the video .-.
In the video is only CE 2, I have already seen the Crysis 2 Videos, Trailers, e.t.c
and them are different.
KiLeTheKiLLa 1 year ago
@KiLeTheKiLLa
your a dumbass,yes there is,cryengine 3 is for crysis 2
asomeman1223 1 year ago
Cryengine 3 > Unreal Engine 3
lolmaster42 1 year ago
But this cant be real...
marco12en3 1 year ago
...... cryengine2 .....
...
Love it
marco12en3 1 year ago
That was a mix between CryEngine 2 and 3 vs Unreal Engine 3...
But, both engines are great in their own way. Unreal Engine 3 is designed to offer good graphics at good performance and outstanding gameplay. And the CryEngine 2 is made mostly for outstanding graphics.
I prefer both :>
R4Zy3L 2 years ago
Both game engines are great, but I prefer better the CryEngine3
szabotihamer16 2 years ago
those first screens are from cryengine 2 ....
esnaw007 2 years ago 30