HOW COME THE ARE TALKING ABOUT A SCREEN IN THE BRAIN A FEW CUBIC CENTIMETERS,NEVER SEEN THAT PART OF THE BRAIN IN PICTURES AS PART OF THE
BRAIN, AND HOW COME THE PICTURE INSIDE THE BRAIN HAS TO BE INVERTED, DO NOT WE HAVE A TRANSFORMER TO STRAIGHT THIS IMAGE RIGHT, CAUSE WE SEE EVERYTHING RIGHT.PLEASE ANSWER.
There is no point in arguing with someone who is so willfully ignorant as to see all of the miracles of existence and conclude that there is no one who created it. That it came about of its own accord. There could not be a simpler mind on earth.
Every single thought or concept conjured up by your brain is formed by different vibrations of energy within your brain. So when an atheist uses "logic", their brain is vibrating at a different frequency than a deist like myself, theist, buhhist, etc. I firmly believe that our perception of reality is what forms our hyper-reality after death. It seems like atheists are depressed emos that easily dismisses the notion of an afterlife.
@FukMyBuffSmellyPussy I KNOW THANXPLEASE HURRY CAUSE I CAN'T TAKE IT NO MORE. This so called reality is not meant for me. I am even inside a body that is not mine and I'm not happy with it.
@LatinFunkJazz I'm guessing that the gates in your brain are down. Reality and dreams become blurred. Most people are gated and have no issues unless they sleep.
When we all start to think differently than our reality will change. we may have de-evolved from a higher state of conciousness. Watch forbidden archology and devolution it is interesting
This is from "What the Bleep do we know?!" Which abuses real quantum physics by distorting and layering over it with layers of mystical new age wooberish.
They use:
Scientific terminology while talking gibberish
Edit interviews to appear to be saying more than they are.
Distorting real science, annoying their authors no end.
Ok, so you have a very small understanding of quantum physics. Now you must understand then, the principals of the atom, how they react when an observer is observing them/it... What is it giving its information, were does it get its intelligence from?.You know, the same intelligence which is given to the "rain drop" as it forms into a snow flake, take into consideration, no two snowflakes are the same, and what intelligence froms complex shapes to form the flake?
I disagree. Atom's dont act the way that they do because they are intelligent. They act according to well defined laws.
You cannot really say that no too snowdrops are the same. What you can say is that it is highly unlikely that too snow drops will have the exact same properties.
Besides, even if the world is an illusion. The animals in my illusion evolved from a common ancester.
@automaticSOM Atoms do not behave to well defining laws, have you seen "the double slit" experiment?...Feel free to watch. watch?v=DfPeprQ7oGc
And its true, its the same as finger prints, no two are the same. EVER!...Well non that humans know of. "fingerprints or snowflakes"
Yes, yes, yes... that is the way the illusion works, within this illusion we need faith, even if its to give substance to "reality". Humans think we are clever, and we are, when we limit ourselves to five senses.
....but when we think outside of the box, beyond our five senses, then that is the next step in evolution, but not evolution of matter, as matter is only give substance through the observation.
Frequency's are evolving. Look into cymatics and see the intelligence for yourself, it really is amazing. It is this that gives the raindrop its information. Frequency's carry "intent".
There ARE more than 5 senses, but they are not this fabled next step of evolution (as if evolution worked like that anyway.)
You ARE NOT talking about extra senses, but believing inane fantasies about "quantum consciousness." Which is nothing but unsubstantiated foolishness (as the only real quantum physicist in the move stated unequivocally in the interview they spliced, edited and quote-mined throughout the film.)
Jesus fukin christ.....Quantum consciousness, fantasy??? Fuk me sideways, ive heard it all. Holy fukin dog shit!!!!....Have you heard yourself....Go back to sleep "ad".
I aint swearing towards you either adparker, im just expressing my character, my "ego" has got the best of me!..I know it might soung "hocus pocus", but just look into it for me. i know you have said you have seen stuff on this, but look again....Please dude, and then get back to me....
...And there is no REAL implied intelligence in cymatics. Except as a fantasy dreamed up by people such as those who made this atrocious film.
It's all the same fundamental mistake; the all too human tendency to attribute agency to damn near everything. It is why our ancestors attributed the thunder and lightening to the gods (agents), why we get mad at our cars, computers and any number of inanimate objects when they fail to do what we want: Imagine agency, even when we know better.
Hahaaa, cymatics a fantasy??...It proves beyond doubt, within frequency's is intelligence. You are a frequency, nothing more, nor nothing less. And yeahh, hard for me to believe,in your frequency is that intelligence...Albeit, dormant!
No "ad", your so wrong dude, the only fundamental mistake is the one you are making. By this i mean, you are closing your mind, you have become closed and unwilling even to expand your mind! ;o)
A mind open by wonder, is much healthier than one closed in belief!
"cymatics a fantasy??" Who said that? I think your reading comprehension needs work.
"I" am not a frequency, but (if QM is correct in this of course) a collection of a vast array of frequencies. One emergent property of this is intelligence. Just as it is now realised that what we call "mind" is an emergent property (more properly a set of functions) of a physical brain.
The "quantum intelligence" crap from this film is a huge non sequitur leap of insanity from the real science being done.
Ah yes the old "if you don't BELIEVE my story...then you have a closed mind."
No; accepting a proposition as THE TRUTH is the closing of the mind.
I have, with an open mind, watched the entire extended edition of this film. Own the DVD. There is a decided lack of substance. IF there is any truth to be found in there, it is not to be found in the film. And I would be happy to accept it if ever truly substantiated in any way. This has yet to pas however, so I keep an open mind, as always.
Yes I have seen the two slit experiment but that doesnt change the fact that atoms adhere to certain laws. Even the uncertainty principle is in itself a law.
I dont see how you can interpret quantum mechanics how you do.
@automaticSOM It is because my thinking is not on the particle itself, its on the environment, this is full of potential...This is were the intelligence is...Unified field of consciousness...The fundamental roots of all intelligence. This is not hocus pocus, it is science..
@2010FuckUTube no, this is talking without actually saying anything.
The double split experiment do not show that atoms don´t behave to well defining laws. It shows that sub-atomic particles (like photons, neutrinos...) behave differently from what classical randomness would suggest. But you can predict their behavior with the laws of quantum physics. And atoms obey those laws.
The observations you´re doing are science, but the conclusions you are making are, in fact, madly wrong
> Yes I have seen the two slit experiment but that doesnt change the fact that atoms adhere to certain laws. Even the uncertainty principle is in itself a law. <
------
And these laws are what? They are the laws of nature, or the laws of nature's infinite intelligence ..or God's infinite intelligence. Call it what you will.
Atoms DO. Subatomic particles do not, as quantum mechanics is largely a mystery still.
I am aware of the double split experiment, even read an actual paper or two on the subject. Interesting - but these leaps to intelligence being involved are far beyond reasonable.
It includes concepts of quantum uncertainty, probability and randomness
And Faith is just Belief through the (wilful) abandonment of reason. No thanks.
And there are a hel of a lot more than 5 senses;,how preschool of you.
@2010FuckUTube watch a program called "everything you know about the universe is wrong" It is on utube. I saw it originally on the science channel. Science data is saying that we are only seeing something like 30% of the universe and the rest is dark matter and dark energy.
You are making the mistake of attributing agency to a physical action. "Intelligence" is just your assumption. You can't(rationally/justifiably) just assert that it is intelligence.
e.g. snow and crystal formation does create fascinating patterns, but due to fairly well understood natural processes, not intent or intelligence.
The subatomic particle (not "atom") observer reactions stuff is interesting, but not well understood, even by quantum physicists. No intelligence presumed however.
@2010FuckUTube I agree. For example, the process of abiogenesis that formed amino acids, etc. is bizarre which inhabits each lifeform. And even inside DNA there's atoms, a nucleus, electrons, protons, neutrons, quarks, and superstrings. How can these constituents give rise to consciousness and the feeling of self-awareness. There has to be some mysterious force beyond our perception of reality. Maybe those dimensions of M-theory are really there.
"What the Bleep Do We Know" is a pile of rubbish. Trust me. I'm an evil scientist. And you spout rubbish too. Maybe you should become friends with the local dumpster, I'd bet you'd get along well.
@Sailor231 No different than what? That makes no sense. And what makes you think that my opinions stem from just one video anyway?!
And I'm not your son either.
If you really want to know what convinced me that it was all wrong; it was a watching a DVD called "What The Bleep!?: Down The Rabbit Hole: Deluxe collectors edition" (which I own.) That was enough to convince me.
The whole point of the film "what the bleep" IS to debunk "real science" Because the point is to show you what is "quote real" is subjective. The act of believing in anything "causes" you the observer to perceive the objective reality AS fact/fixed. The objective (finished) universe acts as if its static and solid. Attention through a belief with perception changes what is perceived by the act of perceiving Its all in "the way" in which you the observer observes.
Who said below comment you have a small understanding of Quantum Mechanics. The less the better.
We need to know less about science and QM and more about how to use our perceptions and beliefs. We are all gods
and create universes yet we live on our knees hoping "white coat" scientists can solve our problems by informing us with more facts. "It is harder for a real scientist to pass through the eye of a needle than a child to enter the kingdom of God"
@adparker314 Do you know how every thing works, or are you just saying what you interpret this video as? ones a man sad the world is round. he was redeculed. but he vas proven to be rigth. so the understanding of quantum physics that the human race has now. may be proven rigth or wrong in the future.
@NixonAre Know how everything works? No, why do you ask? The film from which this video is taken is a dishonest misrepresentation conflating a cult's doctrine with real science.
Your made up example of a man saying the world is round in no way suggests any validity to the silly claims in the film. "Once a man said that the world came out of a giant universal egg, should we accept that as true as well? No, that is not how reason works; You Make the claim, you back it up with evidence.
@adparker314 my example of a man saying the world is round. was not an atempt of validating this movie or its content. my point was that we base our view of the world on things we learn at school see inn the media or books. how do we know any of it is as it seems? todays cuting edge science is tomorows we used to beleve that.
@NixonAre Sure, the world and or understanding of it moves on.
Films like this try to capitalise on this in order to push their woo as if it was "the future" when in fact it is mystical mumbo jumbo abusing the work of real science to further their own delusional beliefs.
It's not like I dismiss the message of the film out of hand (I even brought the extended edition to give it a fair shake) I dismiss it because it distorts not furthers, understanding, undermines progress not aids it.
@sorienor, now that is a mature comment..How old are you? 40yo and still following the heard, get a grip and gain a little intelligence in neurological science and quantum physics. FFS, the information is right in front of you and you neglect it as if its in another language.
These people talking have many a Ph.D. unlike yourself. I know who i trust....myself. You evolutionist crack me up. Expand your mind bollocks, think outside the box. A mind open by wonder is better than one closed in belief
@sorienor I very much doubt that. WTF are you made from?...Your comprised of between 50&100 TRILLION cells. Are are these cells made from something outta this world?...NO, they themselves are made from atoms. Just like everything you see around you. You need to open up a little, and stop slagging people off on my videos. This is open for debate, but not when you start slinging mud around!!!
As an evolutionist, explain how you could get all this matter in the universe to the size of a pinhead....
There is no such thing as an "evolutionist". Fail #1.
If you really wanted to know the answer to your question, you would have looked it up. But I doubt you do want an answer, because the inevitable result would be showing your woowoo is just pretend. Fail #2.
Refusing to apply the same scrutiny to you own beliefs you ask of others to do to theirs, EPIC FAIL #3.
@sorienor Fail, on what? "evolutionist"..No such thing???...WTF....
2, You cannot answer the question, because this contradicts your belief, as you well know, all the matter in the universe cannot possibly be "squeezed" into the size of a pinhead. FACT!....The only way to answer, would be to have some sort of understanding of quantum physics. Quite clearly you have neglected science.
3, Again, presumptions on your behalf. I am at war with my beliefs all the time, but, common sense prevails.
Yes, there is no such thing as an "evolutionist". that is a made-up term by those who really, really wish that evolution is somehow a religion and not observed fact.
Fine, I'll answer #2:
Energy has no mass or volume, so after converting all the mass in the universe back to energy it can, in fact, ALL be present in a singularity. You fail, completely and totally.
Common sense fails completely when trying to understand science, as much of reality goes quite contrary to our expectations. Fail!
Reading through the Uploader Comments section, I've come to the conclusion that OP is so full of shit I'd be better educated listening to my toilet.
jimmyboyG485 3 weeks ago
"Remember to stay in the heart where the impossible is possible" Tony Samara
samarafoundation 3 weeks ago
HOW COME THE ARE TALKING ABOUT A SCREEN IN THE BRAIN A FEW CUBIC CENTIMETERS,NEVER SEEN THAT PART OF THE BRAIN IN PICTURES AS PART OF THE
BRAIN, AND HOW COME THE PICTURE INSIDE THE BRAIN HAS TO BE INVERTED, DO NOT WE HAVE A TRANSFORMER TO STRAIGHT THIS IMAGE RIGHT, CAUSE WE SEE EVERYTHING RIGHT.PLEASE ANSWER.
ROBECABAL 1 month ago
There is no point in arguing with someone who is so willfully ignorant as to see all of the miracles of existence and conclude that there is no one who created it. That it came about of its own accord. There could not be a simpler mind on earth.
tardwhisperer 2 months ago
I think about this stuff, all day, everyday. And it vexes me.
ebowebo 3 months ago
what is the name of this film? thank you.
TheMountainlotus 4 months ago
Every single thought or concept conjured up by your brain is formed by different vibrations of energy within your brain. So when an atheist uses "logic", their brain is vibrating at a different frequency than a deist like myself, theist, buhhist, etc. I firmly believe that our perception of reality is what forms our hyper-reality after death. It seems like atheists are depressed emos that easily dismisses the notion of an afterlife.
henf5671 8 months ago
@FukMyBuffSmellyPussy I KNOW THANXPLEASE HURRY CAUSE I CAN'T TAKE IT NO MORE. This so called reality is not meant for me. I am even inside a body that is not mine and I'm not happy with it.
LatinFunkJazz 10 months ago
CAN SOMEONE TELL ME WHY I FEEL THAT I'M DREAMING? I FELT IT ALMOST MY ENTIRE LIFE. STARTED WHEN I REACHED MY TEENAGE YEARS. I AM NOW 30.
LatinFunkJazz 10 months ago
@LatinFunkJazz I'm guessing that the gates in your brain are down. Reality and dreams become blurred. Most people are gated and have no issues unless they sleep.
3877michael 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you'll get lost in this finite language, and kill each-other before you agree.
smile, you're dying and going to die.
kosterfardos 11 months ago
you'll get lost in this finite language, and kill each-other before you agree.
smile, you're dying and going to die.
kosterfardos 11 months ago
AHHHHH
somebody126 1 year ago
When we all start to think differently than our reality will change. we may have de-evolved from a higher state of conciousness. Watch forbidden archology and devolution it is interesting
Thundralight 1 year ago
Nice little rant 2010FuckUTube. Rea mature.
That film is a piece of dishonest trash, created by a silly cult run by a woman claiming to channel some ancient warrior's ghost. It's a joke.
None of your silly little rant has ANYTHING to do with the video YOU submitted.
adparker314 2 years ago
sorienor is correct.
This is from "What the Bleep do we know?!" Which abuses real quantum physics by distorting and layering over it with layers of mystical new age wooberish.
They use:
Scientific terminology while talking gibberish
Edit interviews to appear to be saying more than they are.
Distorting real science, annoying their authors no end.
Claiming pseudo-science as if the real thing...
Look for this video for one example of debunking:
"Debunked! - What the Bleep Do We Know?"
adparker314 2 years ago 2
Ok, so you have a very small understanding of quantum physics. Now you must understand then, the principals of the atom, how they react when an observer is observing them/it... What is it giving its information, were does it get its intelligence from?.You know, the same intelligence which is given to the "rain drop" as it forms into a snow flake, take into consideration, no two snowflakes are the same, and what intelligence froms complex shapes to form the flake?
Intelligence is the key to life!
2010FuckUTube 2 years ago 5
I disagree. Atom's dont act the way that they do because they are intelligent. They act according to well defined laws.
You cannot really say that no too snowdrops are the same. What you can say is that it is highly unlikely that too snow drops will have the exact same properties.
Besides, even if the world is an illusion. The animals in my illusion evolved from a common ancester.
automaticSOM 2 years ago
@automaticSOM Atoms do not behave to well defining laws, have you seen "the double slit" experiment?...Feel free to watch. watch?v=DfPeprQ7oGc
And its true, its the same as finger prints, no two are the same. EVER!...Well non that humans know of. "fingerprints or snowflakes"
Yes, yes, yes... that is the way the illusion works, within this illusion we need faith, even if its to give substance to "reality". Humans think we are clever, and we are, when we limit ourselves to five senses.
2010FuckUTube 2 years ago 2
....but when we think outside of the box, beyond our five senses, then that is the next step in evolution, but not evolution of matter, as matter is only give substance through the observation.
Frequency's are evolving. Look into cymatics and see the intelligence for yourself, it really is amazing. It is this that gives the raindrop its information. Frequency's carry "intent".
2010FuckUTube 2 years ago
That makes no sense whatsoever.
There ARE more than 5 senses, but they are not this fabled next step of evolution (as if evolution worked like that anyway.)
You ARE NOT talking about extra senses, but believing inane fantasies about "quantum consciousness." Which is nothing but unsubstantiated foolishness (as the only real quantum physicist in the move stated unequivocally in the interview they spliced, edited and quote-mined throughout the film.)
adparker314 2 years ago
Jesus fukin christ.....Quantum consciousness, fantasy??? Fuk me sideways, ive heard it all. Holy fukin dog shit!!!!....Have you heard yourself....Go back to sleep "ad".
I aint swearing towards you either adparker, im just expressing my character, my "ego" has got the best of me!..I know it might soung "hocus pocus", but just look into it for me. i know you have said you have seen stuff on this, but look again....Please dude, and then get back to me....
Healthy debates are cool.
MrCrowFace 2 years ago
...And there is no REAL implied intelligence in cymatics. Except as a fantasy dreamed up by people such as those who made this atrocious film.
It's all the same fundamental mistake; the all too human tendency to attribute agency to damn near everything. It is why our ancestors attributed the thunder and lightening to the gods (agents), why we get mad at our cars, computers and any number of inanimate objects when they fail to do what we want: Imagine agency, even when we know better.
adparker314 2 years ago
Hahaaa, cymatics a fantasy??...It proves beyond doubt, within frequency's is intelligence. You are a frequency, nothing more, nor nothing less. And yeahh, hard for me to believe,in your frequency is that intelligence...Albeit, dormant!
No "ad", your so wrong dude, the only fundamental mistake is the one you are making. By this i mean, you are closing your mind, you have become closed and unwilling even to expand your mind! ;o)
A mind open by wonder, is much healthier than one closed in belief!
MrCrowFace 2 years ago
"cymatics a fantasy??" Who said that? I think your reading comprehension needs work.
"I" am not a frequency, but (if QM is correct in this of course) a collection of a vast array of frequencies. One emergent property of this is intelligence. Just as it is now realised that what we call "mind" is an emergent property (more properly a set of functions) of a physical brain.
The "quantum intelligence" crap from this film is a huge non sequitur leap of insanity from the real science being done.
adparker314 2 years ago
Ah yes the old "if you don't BELIEVE my story...then you have a closed mind."
No; accepting a proposition as THE TRUTH is the closing of the mind.
I have, with an open mind, watched the entire extended edition of this film. Own the DVD. There is a decided lack of substance. IF there is any truth to be found in there, it is not to be found in the film. And I would be happy to accept it if ever truly substantiated in any way. This has yet to pas however, so I keep an open mind, as always.
adparker314 2 years ago
Yes I have seen the two slit experiment but that doesnt change the fact that atoms adhere to certain laws. Even the uncertainty principle is in itself a law.
I dont see how you can interpret quantum mechanics how you do.
automaticSOM 2 years ago
@automaticSOM It is because my thinking is not on the particle itself, its on the environment, this is full of potential...This is were the intelligence is...Unified field of consciousness...The fundamental roots of all intelligence. This is not hocus pocus, it is science..
2010FuckUTube 2 years ago 8
@2010FuckUTube
What is the name of this fim? Thank You.
TheMountainlotus 4 months ago
@2010FuckUTube no, this is talking without actually saying anything.
The double split experiment do not show that atoms don´t behave to well defining laws. It shows that sub-atomic particles (like photons, neutrinos...) behave differently from what classical randomness would suggest. But you can predict their behavior with the laws of quantum physics. And atoms obey those laws.
The observations you´re doing are science, but the conclusions you are making are, in fact, madly wrong
MrJay21121990 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@automaticSOM wrote:
> Yes I have seen the two slit experiment but that doesnt change the fact that atoms adhere to certain laws. Even the uncertainty principle is in itself a law. <
------
And these laws are what? They are the laws of nature, or the laws of nature's infinite intelligence ..or God's infinite intelligence. Call it what you will.
Stoory 1 month ago
Atoms DO. Subatomic particles do not, as quantum mechanics is largely a mystery still.
I am aware of the double split experiment, even read an actual paper or two on the subject. Interesting - but these leaps to intelligence being involved are far beyond reasonable.
It includes concepts of quantum uncertainty, probability and randomness
And Faith is just Belief through the (wilful) abandonment of reason. No thanks.
And there are a hel of a lot more than 5 senses;,how preschool of you.
adparker314 2 years ago
@2010FuckUTube watch a program called "everything you know about the universe is wrong" It is on utube. I saw it originally on the science channel. Science data is saying that we are only seeing something like 30% of the universe and the rest is dark matter and dark energy.
Thundralight 1 year ago
You are making the mistake of attributing agency to a physical action. "Intelligence" is just your assumption. You can't(rationally/justifiably) just assert that it is intelligence.
e.g. snow and crystal formation does create fascinating patterns, but due to fairly well understood natural processes, not intent or intelligence.
The subatomic particle (not "atom") observer reactions stuff is interesting, but not well understood, even by quantum physicists. No intelligence presumed however.
adparker314 2 years ago
@2010FuckUTube I agree. For example, the process of abiogenesis that formed amino acids, etc. is bizarre which inhabits each lifeform. And even inside DNA there's atoms, a nucleus, electrons, protons, neutrons, quarks, and superstrings. How can these constituents give rise to consciousness and the feeling of self-awareness. There has to be some mysterious force beyond our perception of reality. Maybe those dimensions of M-theory are really there.
henf5671 8 months ago
@2010FuckUTube
"What the Bleep Do We Know" is a pile of rubbish. Trust me. I'm an evil scientist. And you spout rubbish too. Maybe you should become friends with the local dumpster, I'd bet you'd get along well.
MathDoobler 3 months ago
@adparker314 You saw 1 video that says it's all wrong. You are no different than the man who spills his brains. Keep reading son.
Sailor231 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Sailor231 No different than what? That makes no sense. And what makes you think that my opinions stem from just one video anyway?!
And I'm not your son either.
If you really want to know what convinced me that it was all wrong; it was a watching a DVD called "What The Bleep!?: Down The Rabbit Hole: Deluxe collectors edition" (which I own.) That was enough to convince me.
adparker314 5 months ago
The whole point of the film "what the bleep" IS to debunk "real science" Because the point is to show you what is "quote real" is subjective. The act of believing in anything "causes" you the observer to perceive the objective reality AS fact/fixed. The objective (finished) universe acts as if its static and solid. Attention through a belief with perception changes what is perceived by the act of perceiving Its all in "the way" in which you the observer observes.
4444colin 5 months ago
Respond to this video...
Who said below comment you have a small understanding of Quantum Mechanics. The less the better.
We need to know less about science and QM and more about how to use our perceptions and beliefs. We are all gods
and create universes yet we live on our knees hoping "white coat" scientists can solve our problems by informing us with more facts. "It is harder for a real scientist to pass through the eye of a needle than a child to enter the kingdom of God"
4444colin 5 months ago
@adparker314 Do you know how every thing works, or are you just saying what you interpret this video as? ones a man sad the world is round. he was redeculed. but he vas proven to be rigth. so the understanding of quantum physics that the human race has now. may be proven rigth or wrong in the future.
NixonAre 1 month ago
@NixonAre Know how everything works? No, why do you ask? The film from which this video is taken is a dishonest misrepresentation conflating a cult's doctrine with real science.
Your made up example of a man saying the world is round in no way suggests any validity to the silly claims in the film. "Once a man said that the world came out of a giant universal egg, should we accept that as true as well? No, that is not how reason works; You Make the claim, you back it up with evidence.
adparker314 1 month ago
@adparker314 my example of a man saying the world is round. was not an atempt of validating this movie or its content. my point was that we base our view of the world on things we learn at school see inn the media or books. how do we know any of it is as it seems? todays cuting edge science is tomorows we used to beleve that.
NixonAre 1 month ago
@NixonAre Sure, the world and or understanding of it moves on.
Films like this try to capitalise on this in order to push their woo as if it was "the future" when in fact it is mystical mumbo jumbo abusing the work of real science to further their own delusional beliefs.
It's not like I dismiss the message of the film out of hand (I even brought the extended edition to give it a fair shake) I dismiss it because it distorts not furthers, understanding, undermines progress not aids it.
adparker314 1 month ago
@adparker314 this i can appreciate.
I finde you intresting to discuss with my friend, have a nice day :)
NixonAre 1 month ago
bunch of woowoo.
sorienor 2 years ago
@sorienor, now that is a mature comment..How old are you? 40yo and still following the heard, get a grip and gain a little intelligence in neurological science and quantum physics. FFS, the information is right in front of you and you neglect it as if its in another language.
These people talking have many a Ph.D. unlike yourself. I know who i trust....myself. You evolutionist crack me up. Expand your mind bollocks, think outside the box. A mind open by wonder is better than one closed in belief
MrCrowFace 2 years ago
The problem is you've opened your mind so much your brains have fallen out.
Just provide evidence, real evidence..not some video garbage but peer-reviewed papers and double-blind studies to back up anything said.
Basically you're saying it's perfectly ok to listen to *these* and only these particular PhD's because they happen to be saying things you like.
sorienor 2 years ago
@sorienor I very much doubt that. WTF are you made from?...Your comprised of between 50&100 TRILLION cells. Are are these cells made from something outta this world?...NO, they themselves are made from atoms. Just like everything you see around you. You need to open up a little, and stop slagging people off on my videos. This is open for debate, but not when you start slinging mud around!!!
As an evolutionist, explain how you could get all this matter in the universe to the size of a pinhead....
2010FuckUTube 2 years ago
There is no such thing as an "evolutionist". Fail #1.
If you really wanted to know the answer to your question, you would have looked it up. But I doubt you do want an answer, because the inevitable result would be showing your woowoo is just pretend. Fail #2.
Refusing to apply the same scrutiny to you own beliefs you ask of others to do to theirs, EPIC FAIL #3.
sorienor 2 years ago
@sorienor Fail, on what? "evolutionist"..No such thing???...WTF....
2, You cannot answer the question, because this contradicts your belief, as you well know, all the matter in the universe cannot possibly be "squeezed" into the size of a pinhead. FACT!....The only way to answer, would be to have some sort of understanding of quantum physics. Quite clearly you have neglected science.
3, Again, presumptions on your behalf. I am at war with my beliefs all the time, but, common sense prevails.
2010FuckUTube 2 years ago
Yes, there is no such thing as an "evolutionist". that is a made-up term by those who really, really wish that evolution is somehow a religion and not observed fact.
Fine, I'll answer #2:
Energy has no mass or volume, so after converting all the mass in the universe back to energy it can, in fact, ALL be present in a singularity. You fail, completely and totally.
Common sense fails completely when trying to understand science, as much of reality goes quite contrary to our expectations. Fail!
sorienor 2 years ago