Personally, I believe in the Continuum Hypothesis. I believe it can be derived from the paradoxes around multiplying any level of infinity about Aleph Nought by 0. You can click on my ID to see what I have to say if you are interested. Nice artwork and music. Very nice.
@CHistrue Godel and Cohen proved that the continuum hypothesis cannot be proved nor disproved within ZFC set theory. What exactly do you mean when you say "multiply a level of infinity by 0"?
@soip Well,the argument is somewhat sloppy unless I can present it in better form. Set theory does not give me a lot of options here. Needless to say it means what it says----multiply a given level of infinity by zero. Such I argue is undefinable at levels of infinity above Aleph0.
Personally, I believe in the Continuum Hypothesis. I believe it can be derived from the paradoxes around multiplying any level of infinity about Aleph Nought by 0. You can click on my ID to see what I have to say if you are interested. Nice artwork and music. Very nice.
Thanks for the comment. Cantor & the Cantor set was the first serious mapping of fractal-ization. Check "Cantor Square" for more detail. Interestingly mathematicians go from 1 to 0. For this, I had to invert from 1 to infinite. 1mm on paper does not look like much! Also I had to stop multiplying at 748 - running out of processing power...Great inspiration though
@bysance The most interesting fact about the Cantor set, imho, is that it has a Lesbegue measure of 0, but a positive Jordan measure. It's also a nice example of a closed infinite set which is never dense.
Try this concept. Yoctation, Zeptation, Autation, Femptation, Pication, Nanation, Micration, Millation, Centation, Negative Decation, Noventation, Negative Octation, Septation, Sexation, Quintation, Quadation, Negative Exponentiation, Division, Subtraction, Zeration, Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation, Tetration, Pentation, Hexation, Heptation, Octation, Nonation, Decation, Hectation, Kilation, Megation, Gigation, Terration, Petation, Exation, Zettation and Yattation.
RJL738 1 month ago
Personally, I believe in the Continuum Hypothesis. I believe it can be derived from the paradoxes around multiplying any level of infinity about Aleph Nought by 0. You can click on my ID to see what I have to say if you are interested. Nice artwork and music. Very nice.
CHistrue 1 year ago
@CHistrue Godel and Cohen proved that the continuum hypothesis cannot be proved nor disproved within ZFC set theory. What exactly do you mean when you say "multiply a level of infinity by 0"?
soip 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@soip Well,the argument is somewhat sloppy unless I can present it in better form. Set theory does not give me a lot of options here. Needless to say it means what it says----multiply a given level of infinity by zero. Such I argue is undefinable at levels of infinity above Aleph0.
CHistrue 2 months ago
Personally, I believe in the Continuum Hypothesis. I believe it can be derived from the paradoxes around multiplying any level of infinity about Aleph Nought by 0. You can click on my ID to see what I have to say if you are interested. Nice artwork and music. Very nice.
CHistrue 1 year ago
mistake at 0.41
Crapulency 1 year ago
nice artwork, but I'm not sure it has anything to do with Cantor.
MrMush4Brains 2 years ago
Thanks for the comment. Cantor & the Cantor set was the first serious mapping of fractal-ization. Check "Cantor Square" for more detail. Interestingly mathematicians go from 1 to 0. For this, I had to invert from 1 to infinite. 1mm on paper does not look like much! Also I had to stop multiplying at 748 - running out of processing power...Great inspiration though
bysance 2 years ago
@bysance The most interesting fact about the Cantor set, imho, is that it has a Lesbegue measure of 0, but a positive Jordan measure. It's also a nice example of a closed infinite set which is never dense.
Tikeslar 6 months ago
this is a fractal or set theory? I thought cantor worked mostly on set theory and mandelbrot worked in fractals.
hotelroyale100 2 years ago
On voit ici, en partie, comment travaille l'artiste, la capacité combinatoire de son esprit, et son coup d'oeil, rapide et sûr.
cpbruter 3 years ago