@senditon1993 hi, I tried it I got '476748' first time :) took me about 1/2 a minute. Are you understanding the process? Perhaps you made a simple mistake in your arithmetic?
@senditon1993 Huh... Get it right! You've done it so wrong. I've just worked it out and it came to exactly what it said on my calulater. Maybe you ought to watch it again, and get it right this time!
@yuirrr when you learn it is really easy doesn't take any longer than the traditional method but is simpler to add up :) each to their own you use whatever you are comfortable with, I made a video about it that's all :P
@keltow we used to this at college in exams where no calculator was allowed! Thanks, not a trick just a way of laying out the math that makes it easy.... :)
My teacher said this was lattice multplication, and he said that we should go from right ot left. It's the fastest way to add numbers (cuz that's how we originally are taught to do them --- from right to left). and we add numbers according to the way the lines flow in form of a diagonal rectangle so that the numbers add up from right to left and finally from bottom to top. You did it just from the right then suddenly from the top to bottom. weird and confusing.
@MejJalTok this IS the lattice method! It doesn't matter which way you fill the grid ie. left to right, top to bottom, I guess it depends which hemisphere your brain is at :P
@CiviliTary OK basically you multiply each number with its coresponding number in the grid and write the result in its box. Add the integers in the boxes DIAGONALLY if the result is greater than ten write the larger number under the next set of diagonal and add as before. Once you sus it becomes really easy and you NEVER need a calculator even for large numbers. In essence it is the same basic math as the regular way.
@bgurtz@bgurtz You multiply each nuumber with its corresponding number and write the result in the box., then add the numbers in the boxes diagonally to get your result..... try watching the video again! :)
@shinyb0y 6 x 7 = 42 (the first column of boxes) each number is multiplied and written in its corrsponding box, the boxes are then added diagonally to give you the answer. Unless you are misunderstanding the method in the video you are correct 7x5 = 35 (the third colum). Later on in the video I made a mistake 6x7=43 LOL thanks for commenting PEACE !
Exact same as normal multiplication, you have the same amount of steps. It takes longer to do this because you are required to create a grid. For those of you who think that this is a faster way to multiply without a calculator than normal multiplication, YOU ARE WRONG! This way can be a little easier because it is more visual, but it takes up more space and is slower!
The University of Chicago School Mathematics Project is a world-reknowned program and teaches this algorithm; they would be bound to cite the cultural source, ie. Chinese, but it is known simply as the lattice method of multiplication.
I have never heard it originating with any specific cultural group.
@DizzyDerwish The lattice method originated in India. We were taught in high school it was called the Chinese Multiplication method. Who cares what your school teaches they don't own it, it's just an idea. Dizzy indeed.
No one seemed to notice you used the word "equation" for something which is an "expression." Makes me sad.
To your critics who say one method is "faster" than another...that's a useless comment. Faster for whom? Why is "faster" your criterion? Which results in fewer errors? Which method leads to true understanding of multiplication?
This is also called LATTICE MULTIPLICATION. I have never heard it callled "Chinese Multiplication." The way I learned it - when adding the digits diagonally - you keep the sum under the diagonal boxes. I think this is a good video except when you add the digits (because you aren't keeping the sums under the diagonals - it appears a bit confusing.)
No offense to your way of multiplying, but this is no different and definitely not faster than the regular one.. because the basics are same and you spend extra time in drawing those boxes
@MattBlytheTheOne you learned this at college? i learned this when i was in the 5th grade we have to use it at my school. im going to the 6th grade, and we HAVE to do it... but it is easier. lol
@jenna756 I just needed an excuse to play with my camera :) I'm still experimenting with youtube lol have a nice day and subscribe if you like, Matt xx
the reason we learn complicated stuff is because there is a lot of people and it would be too easy if everyone pass all the test so they make it way harder but anyway im lucky since i live in the Canada :)
@aznboy3213 I think the eduction system sets a standard, a goal for people to work towards... we all have different Gifts and levels of learning, I don't think it is indicative of failure if you are not good at maths for example. It might just mean you are Gifted in other areas :)
@aznboy3213 I spent years reaching quite a high level of mathematical understanding and I use hardly any of it in the business of life ! Just goes to show...
Chinese Multiplication ? As a Chinese , i never learned to calculate in that way , but i'm sure i can do those multiplications in regular way faster than that
@MattBlytheTheOne Я точно не знаю. Но вроде первые изобрели этот метод в Южной Америки, ещё до рождества Христова. Сами они догадались, или им помогли инопланетяне никто точно не знает.
@Godret1 lol...I'm Chinese-I came to US when I was 5 yrs old...but, I remember in preschool (age 2 to 3), we learned stuff like 143+234324 (addition like that), and when I entered an american school, the kindergarden math was an insult to my intelligence...the class had trouble keeping up with stuff like 6+5!
@MattBlytheTheOne I know, the multiplication method you're using is very simple! I'm not talking about that at all, I'm just saying that blue marker that you're using looks like it's the kind that gives off toxic fumes -- the kind you shouldn't breathe around too long :P
i agree with nadjusca. even though it is the same process the part of drawing the grid takes longer. but this is very very interesting. thanks for uploading
let me clarify. I really enjoyed the techinique but not the "chinese drawing" or the "ah so" comments which are just old racial charicatures being retold by you. thanks.
What Chinese drawing? And what EXACTLY does "ah so" mean to you? Thay are your judgments... Ah so is simply a moment of realisation recognised in many different countries and communities... strike two! ;)
This is the Lattis multiplicatoin method. It's nothing special, I learned this in grade school and it's my main form of multiplication. I'm not Chinese, btw.
this is lattice mltiplication
cherry1234567 1 week ago
OH MY GOD, ive been putting the unit into the hundreth column all this time :S Thanks for the help :)
AQWTmyster7 4 weeks ago
i dont think it's right way. Try 1938x246 and then calculate with your caculator
senditon1993 3 months ago
@senditon1993 hi, I tried it I got '476748' first time :) took me about 1/2 a minute. Are you understanding the process? Perhaps you made a simple mistake in your arithmetic?
MattBlytheTheOne 3 months ago
@senditon1993 Huh... Get it right! You've done it so wrong. I've just worked it out and it came to exactly what it said on my calulater. Maybe you ought to watch it again, and get it right this time!
JessjiTV 1 week ago
@JessjiTV Huh? Which bit do you think I got wrong?? lol
MattBlytheTheOne 1 week ago
@WCWinxClub101 OK I get it thanks :P lol
MattBlytheTheOne 4 months ago
@WCWinxClub101 MISPLLS? where? haha SHOW ME
MattBlytheTheOne 4 months ago
Nice 1 for this it really helped
dylanlovell 5 months ago
OMG I LEARNED THIS IN 3RD GRADE AND FORGOT AND HAVE BEEN LOOKING ALL OVER TO FIND IT THANK YOU!!!!!!! :)
mystyka13 6 months ago
i learnt this in year 7 o.O
hulkhogan100 6 months ago
It took you too much time...
Making the multiplication in the ocidental way was faster to me.
yuirrr 6 months ago
@yuirrr when you learn it is really easy doesn't take any longer than the traditional method but is simpler to add up :) each to their own you use whatever you are comfortable with, I made a video about it that's all :P
MattBlytheTheOne 6 months ago 7
@yuirrr I did in 10 sconds
kendrysa 3 weeks ago
@kendrysa pretty cool :P
MattBlytheTheOne 2 weeks ago
Very nice, but why taking the time to draw those grids?
My mom taught me just put the under each other and then do multiply with each other, kinda like what you did. That's way faster :o
TheWillieee 6 months ago
wow.....say...dis is awesum!!!!u jst saved me loads n loads of time n effort...luv u!!
marquisofAngels 7 months ago
@marquisofAngels awe-sum haha thank you :D
MattBlytheTheOne 7 months ago
Um this is called Lattice Multiplication. I learned it in 4th grade... :D
fizzixizpro 7 months ago
Took you 5:38 to finish, I could've gotten a calculator in that time :P
Joking,, Very cool 'trick'
keltow 7 months ago
@keltow we used to this at college in exams where no calculator was allowed! Thanks, not a trick just a way of laying out the math that makes it easy.... :)
MattBlytheTheOne 7 months ago
the fastest way is use calculator
yzzl91 7 months ago
@yzzl91 not if you don't have a calculator !
MattBlytheTheOne 1 week ago
My teacher said this was lattice multplication, and he said that we should go from right ot left. It's the fastest way to add numbers (cuz that's how we originally are taught to do them --- from right to left). and we add numbers according to the way the lines flow in form of a diagonal rectangle so that the numbers add up from right to left and finally from bottom to top. You did it just from the right then suddenly from the top to bottom. weird and confusing.
MejJalTok 8 months ago
@MejJalTok this IS the lattice method! It doesn't matter which way you fill the grid ie. left to right, top to bottom, I guess it depends which hemisphere your brain is at :P
MattBlytheTheOne 8 months ago
this is really wowwww
gjpshallow 8 months ago
@gjpshallow thank you for sharing :)
MattBlytheTheOne 8 months ago
simply wow
gjpshallow 8 months ago
Got lost on the diagonal addition part. Forget it the old fashion way is easier and quicker
CiviliTary 8 months ago
@CiviliTary says more about you than about the math !
MattBlytheTheOne 8 months ago
@MattBlytheTheOne
I'm 25 I can add. I didn't see every step used like how you was carrying the one and all.
I dont care to watch over and over because I prefer the regular way.
CiviliTary 8 months ago
@CiviliTary OK basically you multiply each number with its coresponding number in the grid and write the result in its box. Add the integers in the boxes DIAGONALLY if the result is greater than ten write the larger number under the next set of diagonal and add as before. Once you sus it becomes really easy and you NEVER need a calculator even for large numbers. In essence it is the same basic math as the regular way.
MattBlytheTheOne 8 months ago
... This is the lattice method, I don't know if it's Chinese or anything, but they teach you this stuff in like second grade.
Achtohpuss 8 months ago
@Achtohpuss Yeah it originated in India I believe :)
MattBlytheTheOne 8 months ago
You could also use a calculator
FuglsangProductions 9 months ago
@FuglsangProductions not in an exam without calculators !
MattBlytheTheOne 8 months ago
wow, im gonna use it at school. thanks a lot! lol :)
weluvchees3 9 months ago
i don't understand!
bgurtz 10 months ago
@bgurtz @bgurtz You multiply each nuumber with its corresponding number and write the result in the box., then add the numbers in the boxes diagonally to get your result..... try watching the video again! :)
MattBlytheTheOne 10 months ago
is this really the chinese method? Isn't this the TERC lattice method?
bananian 10 months ago
@bananian yes that is correct, Lattice method from India!
MattBlytheTheOne 10 months ago
fking copy cat...i made that up...wat's yo name i was the one who made this up
9412401234567890 10 months ago
@9412401234567890 you don't have a name you have a number !!!!
MattBlytheTheOne 10 months ago
@DizzyDerwish OK DIZZY !
MattBlytheTheOne 10 months ago
@DizzyDerwish Your comments and your self styled judgments have been duly IGNORED thank you!
MattBlytheTheOne 10 months ago
Thankyou this helped as ive got a non calculator maths exam tomorow!
TheMrdominator1997 10 months ago
@TheMrdominator1997 Cool :) hope it went well for you.
MattBlytheTheOne 10 months ago
LOL song is by Moby, oh yeah one of the many songs by moby?
tomvercruysse 10 months ago
@tomvercruysse LOL what's up with Moby?
MattBlytheTheOne 10 months ago
@shinyb0y 6 x 7 = 42 (the first column of boxes) each number is multiplied and written in its corrsponding box, the boxes are then added diagonally to give you the answer. Unless you are misunderstanding the method in the video you are correct 7x5 = 35 (the third colum). Later on in the video I made a mistake 6x7=43 LOL thanks for commenting PEACE !
MattBlytheTheOne 10 months ago
@shinyb0y its 7x6 and not 7x5 ;-)
ryders3000 11 months ago
@shinyb0y lol thanks :P
MattBlytheTheOne 11 months ago
what s this nice music?
anisuthideyakoindu 11 months ago
@anisuthideyakoindu hi its by Moby :) thanks
MattBlytheTheOne 11 months ago
Hahaha never realised a Chinese smiley actually has Chinese eyes!
dextermanus 1 year ago
@dextermanus ¬ _ +
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
Exact same as normal multiplication, you have the same amount of steps. It takes longer to do this because you are required to create a grid. For those of you who think that this is a faster way to multiply without a calculator than normal multiplication, YOU ARE WRONG! This way can be a little easier because it is more visual, but it takes up more space and is slower!
TheBasicStamp 1 year ago
@TheBasicStamp whatdayoumean "YOU ARE WRONG!?" Wrong about what? I never claimed it was faster... doh!
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
@MattBlytheTheOne I was directed to people who made comments about it being faster, not you. I'm sorry if you think that it was directed to you.
TheBasicStamp 1 year ago
@TheBasicStamp Hey! No worries :) This is just a simple way I learned in college. Use whatever way you are comfortable with, it's all good :P
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
@TheCovboy123 ha !
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
Where did 43 come from?
Krames92 1 year ago
@Krames92 lol exactly ! Well spotted...
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
@jacksawild bit of a drastic leap don't you think?
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
we do this in my skool, it's called lattuce
KrayzeeLife 1 year ago
@KrayzeeLife yes it is called "lattice" :)
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
I learned this in 5th grade. I don't use it often though.
KagameKatz 1 year ago
Because Chinese invented multiplication
xcommunicate 1 year ago
"Chinese?"
What's so Chinese about this?
The University of Chicago School Mathematics Project is a world-reknowned program and teaches this algorithm; they would be bound to cite the cultural source, ie. Chinese, but it is known simply as the lattice method of multiplication.
I have never heard it originating with any specific cultural group.
Take off the mystique, okay?
DizzyDerwish 1 year ago
@DizzyDerwish The lattice method originated in India. We were taught in high school it was called the Chinese Multiplication method. Who cares what your school teaches they don't own it, it's just an idea. Dizzy indeed.
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
@MattBlytheTheOne
'Dizzy indeed'
Name-calling? But be fair!
SuzeyCue (below) told you this method's widely-accepted name three months ago, and you only seemed to chuckle then.
Now drop the mystique.
DizzyDerwish 1 year ago
@DizzyDerwish I Like Mystique.
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
i learned this in 5th grade :D
GoldPuffle 1 year ago
No one seemed to notice you used the word "equation" for something which is an "expression." Makes me sad.
To your critics who say one method is "faster" than another...that's a useless comment. Faster for whom? Why is "faster" your criterion? Which results in fewer errors? Which method leads to true understanding of multiplication?
Ddrhl 1 year ago
@Ddrhl hi great comment, personally I found this way easier to remember :)
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
This is also called LATTICE MULTIPLICATION. I have never heard it callled "Chinese Multiplication." The way I learned it - when adding the digits diagonally - you keep the sum under the diagonal boxes. I think this is a good video except when you add the digits (because you aren't keeping the sums under the diagonals - it appears a bit confusing.)
SuzeyCue 1 year ago
@SuzeyCue haha thanks yeah it got a bit out of shape there :)
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
the one with the lines is easyer
stetco86 1 year ago
THIS LOOKS LIKE TAKE LONGER THAN THE OLD WAY, OR THIS IS A BAD EXAMPLE ?
LETXEQUALS 1 year ago 5
@LETXEQUALS that is a good example of a bad comment LOL
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago 11
No offense to your way of multiplying, but this is no different and definitely not faster than the regular one.. because the basics are same and you spend extra time in drawing those boxes
bharatnaruka 1 year ago 2
@bharatnaruka Maybe but this just simplifies the process in my mind. The box drawing time is insignificant. None taken thanks for commenting :)
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
this one is faster than the japanese 'grid' system
cool!
1353233 1 year ago
Napier's Bones works the same way. Simple and reliable. Do you have something for division?
drag0nblight 1 year ago
@drag0nblight I don't do you? I never liked long division !!
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
I can see why asians like the Chinese and Japanese have the rep as maths geniuses with logic puzzles like these to help sharpen the mind.
CalyxAsgard 1 year ago
This is what we do at my school!!! im not chinease im american LOL
jenna756 1 year ago
@jenna756 cool i'm english, I learned this at college! :)
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
@MattBlytheTheOne you learned this at college? i learned this when i was in the 5th grade we have to use it at my school. im going to the 6th grade, and we HAVE to do it... but it is easier. lol
jenna756 1 year ago
@jenna756 lol your profile says 25! Yes it is easy and handy if you do not have a calculator... wish I had learned it in school :)
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
@MattBlytheTheOne LOL i know it does... but it is just to get on youtube. XD you do? i wished i hadnt... LOL
jenna756 1 year ago
@jenna756 I just needed an excuse to play with my camera :) I'm still experimenting with youtube lol have a nice day and subscribe if you like, Matt xx
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
thank you.,
rproono 1 year ago
@rproono aww thank you for watching :)
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
the reason we learn complicated stuff is because there is a lot of people and it would be too easy if everyone pass all the test so they make it way harder but anyway im lucky since i live in the Canada :)
aznboy3213 1 year ago
@aznboy3213 I think the eduction system sets a standard, a goal for people to work towards... we all have different Gifts and levels of learning, I don't think it is indicative of failure if you are not good at maths for example. It might just mean you are Gifted in other areas :)
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
@aznboy3213 I spent years reaching quite a high level of mathematical understanding and I use hardly any of it in the business of life ! Just goes to show...
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
i from malaysia, i'm chinese,i learn this, but i thing this was so hard to calculator
wuiyang 1 year ago
@wuiyang lol this is the easy way !
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
this is completely retarded... how are the Chinese taking our engineering jobs when they're being taught this crap?
klowranc 1 year ago
@klowranc because they are being taught this crap at about the age of two years!! that's why.
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
Yeah, it's easy. But I don't think it's Chinese. It's called "Lattice"
runepoosux 1 year ago
very cool
Thank you for send this video
moreirajesse 1 year ago 13
I do not think this is " Chinese Multiplication ". This mathematical method is now known as " Lattice " ( lat- iss )
melymelz99 1 year ago
Chinese Multiplication ? As a Chinese , i never learned to calculate in that way , but i'm sure i can do those multiplications in regular way faster than that
ltq19900310 1 year ago
@ltq19900310 Some people are saying it is indeed the the "lattice method" originating in India, please forgive my english!
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
thanks for sharing! however you went too fast! could you go slower next time please? thanx
williamlovejr 1 year ago
@williamlovejr no problem William :) thanks!
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
its cool but na im good i dont like anything about the way i was taught
MrPacman187 1 year ago
@MrPacman187 first thing I learned at college was "HOW" to learn! Then to be a good student...
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
@MattBlytheTheOne thats a good piece of advice
MrPacman187 1 year ago
@MrPacman187 ....or at least "do your best" :)
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
@NinjaXSong thats amazing thanks for sharing :)
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
Китайцы воруют ВСЁ. Даже идеи и методы!
Godret1 1 year ago
@Godret1 lol I think this originated India and is called the lattice method !
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
@MattBlytheTheOne Я точно не знаю. Но вроде первые изобрели этот метод в Южной Америки, ещё до рождества Христова. Сами они догадались, или им помогли инопланетяне никто точно не знает.
Godret1 1 year ago
@Godret1 haha I love google translator :)
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
@MattBlytheTheOne :)) Да он очень помогает общаться.
Godret1 1 year ago
@Godret1 lol...I'm Chinese-I came to US when I was 5 yrs old...but, I remember in preschool (age 2 to 3), we learned stuff like 143+234324 (addition like that), and when I entered an american school, the kindergarden math was an insult to my intelligence...the class had trouble keeping up with stuff like 6+5!
NinjaXSong 1 year ago
what grade do they teach this in china?
jaki54321 1 year ago
@jaki54321 I have no idea but I bet it is younger than here in the UK !
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
@jaki54321 I don't know that they do teach this in China!
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
or just use a calculator?
GOUBO1994 1 year ago
@GOUBO1994 true but some exams do not allow the use of calculators :)
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
In my opinion i that you explained this method really good. : )
danielroshanmoniri 1 year ago
@danielroshanmoniri thank you daniel :)
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
That marker looks like it gives off toxic fumes.
invis648 2 years ago
@invis648 it's not that difficult !
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
@MattBlytheTheOne I know, the multiplication method you're using is very simple! I'm not talking about that at all, I'm just saying that blue marker that you're using looks like it's the kind that gives off toxic fumes -- the kind you shouldn't breathe around too long :P
invis648 2 years ago
@invis648 well it does smell kind of nice ;-) lool
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
it's actually the same process but laid out a bit different! The other way is quicker for YOU because you are used to using it...
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
i agree with nadjusca. even though it is the same process the part of drawing the grid takes longer. but this is very very interesting. thanks for uploading
holdenwi 1 year ago
draw faster ;)
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
i dont really think its chinese.. we learned this at school and they called it lattice my teachers didnt mention it was from china
XXXGurlRockerXXX 2 years ago
I think it originated in India
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
@XXXGurlRockerXXX yes the lattice method form India you are correct good student :)
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
whoa thx for dis!!
i tried to learn d other way bt they didnt show hw to do it whn thr's zero..
dis wuld really help in non-cal paper i think.
thanks lot.
x
lucile1010 2 years ago
hey :) thanx
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
=DD
just curious, do they have a similar way to do division??
xDD
lucile1010 2 years ago
don't know, I hope so I always struggled with long division! :)
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
It's... just like normal multiplication. Just in a different format. But it's the same :o
wangxiamei 2 years ago
of course, it would have to be to get the same result :)
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
this is a really easy way to do math like that and its not chinese btw
TheSomeone717 2 years ago
its more complicated than the criss-cross method.
geminisch 2 years ago
i rather use a calculator
localbandss 2 years ago
O_K
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
Chinese? No it's not!
Simple? No, it's not!
If you know how to multiply two one-digit numbers, why not simply multiply the whole thing?
boyblue1171 2 years ago
Well the simple answer is : because i like it this way! doh :)
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
It's not chinese!!
It's the methode "per gelosia" used by the arabic
Flow60200 2 years ago
hi, it seems it is called different names in different parts of the world... I never heard it called that before, thanks :)
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
thanks for the precisions
Flow60200 2 years ago
Wow alot easier that the Mayan way to calculate, i was stuck with 653x 845 in mayan way, but got it right away in this method. Thank You
Gibshift 2 years ago
great technique, but not digging the drawing or the "ah so"
adobogirl 2 years ago
OK digging? Is that a western expression?
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
let me clarify. I really enjoyed the techinique but not the "chinese drawing" or the "ah so" comments which are just old racial charicatures being retold by you. thanks.
adobogirl 2 years ago
What Chinese drawing? And what EXACTLY does "ah so" mean to you? Thay are your judgments... Ah so is simply a moment of realisation recognised in many different countries and communities... strike two! ;)
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
OK thanks but if you think that is radical... don't watch my other videos! lol
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
Hm, for a visual person like myself, this might be a better solution for multiplying in my head. Thanks for the upload.
Oathblivion 2 years ago
haha, "和" means sum
hofiraz 2 years ago
cool :) thanks
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
your welcome, and thanks for the solution. :]
hofiraz 2 years ago
Oh soooo great, man. Thank u for share.
maybe tonight i'll make a chilean version of ur video, is so great, really.
Thanks 'n peace too.
Camirrakiu++
camirrakiu 2 years ago
thank you :) love and peace
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
ok thanks I deleted your comment by mistake :)
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
jajaj pucha compare
es verda qe dicen qe los chilenos
copiamos las cosas bacanes de los extranjeros xD
AmidaKun 2 years ago
in English please , do I look like an alien?
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
cool. but won't this take longer than to multiply it the american way where you multiply from right to left and then add up the numbers?
xiaolintraditional90 2 years ago
hi, Possibly! ...it depends what you are comfortable with...
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
Isn't that called Latis multiplication...
tyler1820 2 years ago
yes! ...and chinese multiplication!
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
The slits-for-eyes and "ah so" were only slightly patronizing. Awes.
panuelita 2 years ago
me...? patronising...? ....NEVER!!
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
This is the Lattis multiplicatoin method. It's nothing special, I learned this in grade school and it's my main form of multiplication. I'm not Chinese, btw.
AnimeladyOMG 2 years ago
thanks for commenting!
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago