I believe in standing up for animals, but maiming people and blowing things up in order to do so? Personally, I think that two wrongs don't make a right...
@westparkwolf Really? I thought he revised his statement and said that he never actually remembers seeing Bin Laden in school, but I wasn't aware that it was proven to be completely false.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This sketch just wasn't funny at all. Trigger Happy TV is funny because it runs against the grain of society, whereas this is just jumping on the band-wagon of smearing animal rights protesters as uneducated bomb-making extremists which isn't true at all. Disappointed, should definitely stick with TriggerHappy
how?? just because they are brave enough to stand up to sick bastards torturing animals?? respect for all the animal rights protesters. thanks for saving a few of thoughs animals lives that were in poor conditions. hope i could help somehow. :(
It's okay to stand up for abused animals, but I don't know if you can extend that far enough to justify destroying private property or maiming someone with a pipe bomb.
I value humans over animals under ANY circumstances. I am against the death penalty. God alone has the right to punish humans with death, and we are never to take human life. I don't think we should kill animals either, but if it comes down to it, human life always trumps it. That's why I have no problem killing animals so we have food to survive. Pedos are still human whether they're sickos or not.
Well, if that's your moral standpoint then fair enough. My moral standpoint is that if someone is of no use to society then we should make use of them. I'd rather see a person recieve a vital organ donation than a serial killer rot in jail.
To be honest, I couldn't give a toss about animal testing these days anyway. If we can butcher them and feast on their flesh then we can put shampoo on them.
Well for starters, having a job, getting higher education and not going around bombing places because I feel sorry for the chickens is fairly useful. Secondly, I never said we should start dishing out vigilante style justice on people. Finally, let's say that I was of absolutely no use to society. Would I be happy society is making use of me? No. Should anyone care? No, just like we shouldn't all feel bad because we're giving rapists a hard time.
so you're valuing animal life over human life? who hasn't broken a law at some point? I say we test stuff on animal rights protesters, if they're so upset about it.
animal rights protesters don't value animal life over human. its just we all care about human life...its all over the news about the suffering etc. and everyone thinks its wrong and at some point does something to stop human suffereing in their life. but, animals can stand up for themselves so a minority of compassionate people have to 'be the voice' for the animals.
suffering of any kind to anything is wrong. thats a fact. if you disagree then i feel very very sorry for you
This sketch just wasn't funny at all. Trigger Happy TV is funny because it runs against the grain of society, whereas this is just jumping on the band-wagon of smearing animal rights protesters as uneducated bomb-making extremists. Disappointed, should definitely stick with TriggerHappy
Why does being an anarchist make me an idiot? Should I just throw my beliefs out the window because Joseph McCarthy ran a successful smear campaign against 'commies'?
I'll stick with the idea that every human being has certain rights that aren't to be tramped upon by anyone, murderer or magistrate.
Government, like all things in life, suffers from diminishing marginal utility. Simply because excessive government can lead to negative marginal utility doesn't necessarily mean ALL government leads to negative marginal utility.
I myself have never ever heard of animal rigths groups making bombs etc. and harming people, so i don´t know why people are talking about terrorists all of the sudden.
andy> I'm an animal liberationist and I'm an industrial worker, I don't hug trees. Incidently enough most of the people who are shown on television campaigning for animal rights are the ones who look alternative, this is done to blacken the movement to the public. I value animals and humans on the same level and despise abuse of life, the most important thing there is.
I'd rather be keeping millions of children from dying of starvation than keeping fuzzy bunnies from having their faces painted, maybe we have different priorities.
Humans are weak. Why use animals to test shit? Be dignified and grow some fuckin balls (no sexist jokes applied) and use another human, preferably yourself.
The term terrorism can be applied to anyone and everyone, so, if you believe one way, and you enforce your belief, you can subsequently be called a terrorist, because terrorism no longer means, the death of innocent people for ones belief, anymore.
Discrust if you had a choice between animal testing, such as testing on rats or a love one dieing of a curable disease which one would you choose???
PS YOU SAID The term terrorism can be applied to anyone and everyone, so, if you believe one way, and you enforce your belief, you can subsequently be called a terrorist, because terrorism no longer means, the death of innocent people for ones belief, anymore.
'terrorism no longer means, the death of innocent people for ones belief'
since when has terrorism meant this? terrorism is the use of threats or violence to intimodate or coerce others. why devalue your comments with such a stupid sentence? there are certainly cases of animal rights activists using terrorism!
I guess that makes the UN an international terrorist organization, threatening economic sanctions in attempt to coerce Iran to stop a legitimate nuclear POWER (not bomb) program would be constituted as a terrorist threat by your definition.
Spot-on comment, couldn't have put it better myself. People imply to do good and care is a sign of frailty and to be cruel is 'manly' etc. But to go agaist years of indoctrination, risk your own career and personal safety, well...it takes balls of steel.
If you were inside the death camps induring unbelievable pain, you would be glad of somebody trying their upmost to protect you. Before you end up with an adverse drug reaction which in the most severe instances will kill you or result in the need for limb amputation or internal organ damage, try to consider alternative cures which are more reliable for your own sake.
I disagree with cosmetics using animals for testings and ingredients but as for medical purposes it very important.
If we can test drugs on animals that save our lives in the future or give people a better standard of life then its a neccessary sacrifice.
And if people are so against it, lets see what they do when they or a close family member are in need of drugs that where successfully produced after testing on animals.
Definatly. There are members of PETA with diabetes, who would die without animal testing. God damn hypocrits. Im all for animal rights, but not PETA animal rights.
Punk7680> If you only knew how corrupt the pharmacutical industry is, you would not trust them with your life. Animal liberationists ARE ordinary people and I think you should meet some of them before you judge. We are very easy to get along with, we are all ages and come from all walks of life and social classes.
It may not be PETA, but it looks like ALF, which is an Animal Rights terrorist group that PETA supports. Check out that show "Bullshit" and you'll know who and what I'm talking about. I oppose animal furs for fashion but I agree that without animal testing, there would be no medical research. I'm sure we would all like our jailed murderers and rapists in these studies but unfortunately that is illegal. I'm hoping that could change..
I remember when trigger happy first turned up on the paramount channel, they would normally happen during breaks and be 2 or 3 minutes long at the most. I used to think to myself "Why don't they make a hole program for this stuff?"
Dom jolly isn't as good with the bbc as he was with trigger happy tv.
By the way, the last post was a reply to conrad12345678910. I know full well it's a made up comedy sketch, I do find it very funny though, as it reminds me of all the rubbish stereotypes that are thrown in our faces all the time.
I think testing drugs on animals is a tragic waste of tasty meat to eat. Evil little hairy fuckers need to be culled. If they have rights then they are equal with us and they are murdering, retarded, incestuous twisted little bastards and deserve to die. Kill all animals they have it coming.
It's staged, I'm an animal liberationist and I know people in the ALF and they are ordinary people. Most of which detest the idea of violence to people. They dont talk in a thick headed tone either. I do love Dom Joly though, he is great.
ali> No, they publish the addresses of these animal abusers so that people can go and protest outside their houses and hopefully make them think about their cruel actions. And 'Scientists'? They are anything but proffesionals and some of the brave few have spoken out against their own kind to expose the fraud of the vivisection industry. It kills us and animals. Please find out before you comment.
How the hell can you say that scientists are "anything but proffesionals"?! They just do their job, they don't need asses like you terrorising them. How does animal testing kill us? It's saved thousands and thousands of lifes! Do some research and stop listening to the media.
fiiishh> I did not say that scientist's weren't profesionals, I said that Animal scientists are anything but professionals and it's true. You really need to find out for yourself before you take an animal tested and approved drug and end up with a life threatening condition. And what you said before was a contradiction, it's the media who actually share your view. The truth is very rarely exposed by them.
I study science so I actually DO know what I am talking about. Almost all drugs need to be tested on animals, I haven't heard of any drugs that have been tested on animals and kill people! You seem to be missing my point, when the media talk about the "bad side" of animal testing they always show the extreme cases of animals being neglected but this rarely happens.
Err. How how does a Dom Jolly sketch taking the mickey out of wacko anarchic animal rights protesters turn into a frantic dicussion on cosmetics and bunny rabbit eyeballs. It's women who perpetuate the animal experiments in their quest for vanity, if we ban women we can solve the problem!
Or you could ban men... the large majority of the people who test on the animals. Now that would solve the problem.
All joking aside, animal experimenters experient not only for make up, but all sorts of products that all people use. Luckly, there is a large variety of vegan, cruelty free products one can buy.
This si absolutely true, honest!!! Let's just think - 36%?! Right. Have you a source for this mindless example of misinformation professor? Now I'm not saying Manchester's great, but why spam unrelated videos with alleged facts which are, quite frankly, laughable!! Incidentally, how do you distinguish the cause of death for people who have died from a combination of latent heart disease, brought to a head in gun-crime-related incident?
So its ok so long as the rabbit doesnt die! Thats ridiculous. What about the suffering it causes. What iheartspain said is completely true btw. Most animal rights people are actually vegan and respect life including human. They want to see the end of suffering not cause more of it. If they do use pipe bombs its to cause damage to property not people. Property that is used to cause harm and suffering.
they are making a joke out of something that is very serious. they do not just put makeup on rabbits. they put it directly into the rabbits eye for days and days while the make up eats away their eyes and causes them intense pain. they force them to eat the makeup and they keep doing that until a certain percentage die...don't buy from companies who think that is okay. there are many companies who also test on CATS AND DOGS!
2 Suggested Videos: 1: the day ted nugent killed all the animals AND 2: I gotta get with your giorl be wally pleasant Thank you
RQVOutdoorMoovies 10 months ago
Mark Wootton. The name of the person acting as the protestor. Lots of videos of him on here.
He plays Shirley Ghostman, some of you may like him, as you like Dom Jolly. Just throwing it out there for anyone in the least bit interested.
guidoridolfi 1 year ago 2
@guidoridolfi I thought it may have been him!
davidhealey1 1 year ago
I believe in standing up for animals, but maiming people and blowing things up in order to do so? Personally, I think that two wrongs don't make a right...
EdNortonisMineLol 1 year ago
Not funny. Shit. Fackoff.
C0CK00 1 year ago
Does everyone deserve a Rolls Royce ?
mwillblade 1 year ago
Do I hear Mark Mark Wootton?!
rulesandwisdom 2 years ago
Fact : dom joly went to school with ozama binlarden. its true , research it yourself !
kingdonash 2 years ago
People don't seem to like your comment, but it's true. Dom Joly did go to school with Bin Laden.
Harmonyww 2 years ago 10
Comment removed
westparkwolf 1 year ago
@Harmonyww
No he didn't. Joly claimed to have gone to school with Bin Laden but this was later proved to be false.
westparkwolf 1 year ago
@westparkwolf Really? I thought he revised his statement and said that he never actually remembers seeing Bin Laden in school, but I wasn't aware that it was proven to be completely false.
Harmonyww 1 year ago
@westparkwolf No shit Sherlock!
WonkyDoodle 10 months ago
I saw someone in a cardboard box and a Rolls Royce!
Ctaak 2 years ago
I'm a vegan and I found this hilarious. Dom Joly is great!
Pincus666 2 years ago
"I have never put makeup on a rabbit"
aurrorra 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This sketch just wasn't funny at all. Trigger Happy TV is funny because it runs against the grain of society, whereas this is just jumping on the band-wagon of smearing animal rights protesters as uneducated bomb-making extremists which isn't true at all. Disappointed, should definitely stick with TriggerHappy
dt2002dk 2 years ago
that's comedy! It's meant to be funny
if this guy was an Al Queda agent, you'd be laughing your buns off
TheChoujinVirus 2 years ago
No, I get that - but like I said, it *wasn't* funny and explained why it wasn't. That's the only point I made...
dt2002dk 2 years ago 3
i wouldn't say animals rights protestors are uneducated. they aren't retarded. they just act like it.
a1mostperf3kt 2 years ago
how?? just because they are brave enough to stand up to sick bastards torturing animals?? respect for all the animal rights protesters. thanks for saving a few of thoughs animals lives that were in poor conditions. hope i could help somehow. :(
boihaggos1 2 years ago 3
It's okay to stand up for abused animals, but I don't know if you can extend that far enough to justify destroying private property or maiming someone with a pipe bomb.
theroachksu 2 years ago 2
@boihaggos1 FFS have a joke for once in your life!
JustCause2Ps3 1 year ago
@JustCause2Ps3 errrrm i do?
boihaggos1 1 year ago
sad bastards arguing about animal rights!!! its a joke u butt nuts
adamidus 3 years ago
hi guys
dom joly is a COMEDIAN...wiki him.
this is a COMEDY sketch from a COMEDY show.
it's meant as A JOKE.
calvin3005 3 years ago
I value humans over animals under ANY circumstances. I am against the death penalty. God alone has the right to punish humans with death, and we are never to take human life. I don't think we should kill animals either, but if it comes down to it, human life always trumps it. That's why I have no problem killing animals so we have food to survive. Pedos are still human whether they're sickos or not.
Midnight722 3 years ago
Well, if that's your moral standpoint then fair enough. My moral standpoint is that if someone is of no use to society then we should make use of them. I'd rather see a person recieve a vital organ donation than a serial killer rot in jail.
To be honest, I couldn't give a toss about animal testing these days anyway. If we can butcher them and feast on their flesh then we can put shampoo on them.
nonnynay 3 years ago
i think that your no use to society therefore going by your own argument....i should "make use" of you. and you'd be happy with that??
laughatmyshit 2 years ago
Well for starters, having a job, getting higher education and not going around bombing places because I feel sorry for the chickens is fairly useful. Secondly, I never said we should start dishing out vigilante style justice on people. Finally, let's say that I was of absolutely no use to society. Would I be happy society is making use of me? No. Should anyone care? No, just like we shouldn't all feel bad because we're giving rapists a hard time.
nonnynay 2 years ago
so you're valuing animal life over human life? who hasn't broken a law at some point? I say we test stuff on animal rights protesters, if they're so upset about it.
Midnight722 3 years ago
lol how many criminals do you know of who've raped and blown up a baby?
hazahaxa 3 years ago
less than 100.
nonnynay 3 years ago
so you think animal life is more valuable than human life. YOU, sir, are an idiot. Go test something on yourself.
Midnight722 3 years ago
animal rights protesters don't value animal life over human. its just we all care about human life...its all over the news about the suffering etc. and everyone thinks its wrong and at some point does something to stop human suffereing in their life. but, animals can stand up for themselves so a minority of compassionate people have to 'be the voice' for the animals.
suffering of any kind to anything is wrong. thats a fact. if you disagree then i feel very very sorry for you
laughatmyshit 2 years ago 2
lost a LOT of respect for Dom Jolly now...
xmandemx 3 years ago
This sketch just wasn't funny at all. Trigger Happy TV is funny because it runs against the grain of society, whereas this is just jumping on the band-wagon of smearing animal rights protesters as uneducated bomb-making extremists. Disappointed, should definitely stick with TriggerHappy
dt2002dk 3 years ago
animal rights protesters are hypocrits
muppetman666 3 years ago
dom joly is my idol!
reper465 3 years ago
Lol Dom Jolly is quite funny even here. But I still prefer Trigger Happy TV, that was just the funniest thing he ever did. :|
admXD 3 years ago 2
this is shit, should of stuck to trigger happy tv.
Temparz 3 years ago
Mark wooton at his best
ecmnco 3 years ago
funny as fuck but you need a sense of humour to see that!!!!!!
advent45143 3 years ago
why were people laughing?????
ass holes.
rockout746 4 years ago
If animal rights activists are so concerned why dont they volunteer to take the animals places for testing instead.
randomusernamemygod 4 years ago
Ah the media, why people gasp when I say "I'm actually an anarchist" when asked what candidate I support.
Thank you inaccurate media portrayals.
RebelWithoutASauce 4 years ago
yeah....that's the reason....either that or they're just shocked how much of an idiot you are.
ItsStillBill 3 years ago
Why does being an anarchist make me an idiot? Should I just throw my beliefs out the window because Joseph McCarthy ran a successful smear campaign against 'commies'?
I'll stick with the idea that every human being has certain rights that aren't to be tramped upon by anyone, murderer or magistrate.
RebelWithoutASauce 3 years ago
Government, like all things in life, suffers from diminishing marginal utility. Simply because excessive government can lead to negative marginal utility doesn't necessarily mean ALL government leads to negative marginal utility.
darkedgexxx 3 years ago 2
I myself have never ever heard of animal rigths groups making bombs etc. and harming people, so i don´t know why people are talking about terrorists all of the sudden.
Celica91TRD 4 years ago
Do some research on PETA and Rodney Coronado.
JovialEel 4 years ago
will do.. i HAVE though heard some bad things about PETA around, but never of anybody blowing someone up.. i myself is a member of wspa..
Celica91TRD 4 years ago
There was something about a firebombing... hmm
GoaTseTung 4 years ago
very funny, i expect most of the tree huggers would not get the joke was ON them.....
andybmth1 4 years ago
if it wasn´t for them the world would already be dead.
Celica91TRD 4 years ago
andy> I'm an animal liberationist and I'm an industrial worker, I don't hug trees. Incidently enough most of the people who are shown on television campaigning for animal rights are the ones who look alternative, this is done to blacken the movement to the public. I value animals and humans on the same level and despise abuse of life, the most important thing there is.
ALFWEDARF 4 years ago 3
I'd rather be keeping millions of children from dying of starvation than keeping fuzzy bunnies from having their faces painted, maybe we have different priorities.
darkedgexxx 3 years ago
Humans are weak. Why use animals to test shit? Be dignified and grow some fuckin balls (no sexist jokes applied) and use another human, preferably yourself.
The term terrorism can be applied to anyone and everyone, so, if you believe one way, and you enforce your belief, you can subsequently be called a terrorist, because terrorism no longer means, the death of innocent people for ones belief, anymore.
Pandemic=Solution
Discrust 4 years ago
Discrust if you had a choice between animal testing, such as testing on rats or a love one dieing of a curable disease which one would you choose???
PS YOU SAID The term terrorism can be applied to anyone and everyone, so, if you believe one way, and you enforce your belief, you can subsequently be called a terrorist, because terrorism no longer means, the death of innocent people for ones belief, anymore.
i will use that logic to call you a terrorist.
mikeehart8 4 years ago
'terrorism no longer means, the death of innocent people for ones belief'
since when has terrorism meant this? terrorism is the use of threats or violence to intimodate or coerce others. why devalue your comments with such a stupid sentence? there are certainly cases of animal rights activists using terrorism!
countfreddie 4 years ago
I guess that makes the UN an international terrorist organization, threatening economic sanctions in attempt to coerce Iran to stop a legitimate nuclear POWER (not bomb) program would be constituted as a terrorist threat by your definition.
darkedgexxx 3 years ago
im proud to say id kill every chicken dog cat bird horse cow just to save you you ignorant prick
animal testing has saved your fucking life
*pain killers
*flu vaccine
*chicken pox jab
all things ppl have died from in the past that now are severly reduced in numbers
kraigus 4 years ago
Spot-on comment, couldn't have put it better myself. People imply to do good and care is a sign of frailty and to be cruel is 'manly' etc. But to go agaist years of indoctrination, risk your own career and personal safety, well...it takes balls of steel.
ALFWEDARF 4 years ago
why is everyone getting so upset???
there is nothing stichkey tape will not fix
fingers1572 4 years ago
lmao this is soo funny
scobyknife2 4 years ago
If you were inside the death camps induring unbelievable pain, you would be glad of somebody trying their upmost to protect you. Before you end up with an adverse drug reaction which in the most severe instances will kill you or result in the need for limb amputation or internal organ damage, try to consider alternative cures which are more reliable for your own sake.
ALFWEDARF 4 years ago 3
They are making fun of the animal liberation front
Evilkaneheights 4 years ago
so he should bunch of weirdo's
crazybeats 4 years ago
I disagree with cosmetics using animals for testings and ingredients but as for medical purposes it very important.
If we can test drugs on animals that save our lives in the future or give people a better standard of life then its a neccessary sacrifice.
And if people are so against it, lets see what they do when they or a close family member are in need of drugs that where successfully produced after testing on animals.
Cheesymunky 4 years ago
Definatly. There are members of PETA with diabetes, who would die without animal testing. God damn hypocrits. Im all for animal rights, but not PETA animal rights.
Punk7680 4 years ago 2
Punk7680> If you only knew how corrupt the pharmacutical industry is, you would not trust them with your life. Animal liberationists ARE ordinary people and I think you should meet some of them before you judge. We are very easy to get along with, we are all ages and come from all walks of life and social classes.
ALFWEDARF 4 years ago
You probably don't even know what animal rights are?
Have you even heard of Peter Singer?
This isn't even PETA dumbass
goingemoguy 4 years ago
It may not be PETA, but it looks like ALF, which is an Animal Rights terrorist group that PETA supports. Check out that show "Bullshit" and you'll know who and what I'm talking about. I oppose animal furs for fashion but I agree that without animal testing, there would be no medical research. I'm sure we would all like our jailed murderers and rapists in these studies but unfortunately that is illegal. I'm hoping that could change..
KawaiiKemonomimi 4 years ago
animals die from being tested on all the time....where the fuck are you getting your info???
penguincrazee2006 4 years ago 2
stewart lee is playing the pipe bomber. what a knob.
Kirkwuk 4 years ago
Stewart Lee ? Was he on the eleven o clock show a few years back, or was that Ian Lee ?
ALFWEDARF 4 years ago
Its mark wooton from confetti not stuart lee. what a knob.
Ivanmoult 4 years ago
its mark wooton
Ivanmoult 4 years ago
I like the nutshell.
Its scary, but I know some activists who do go on like that...
sarah12333 4 years ago
XD That is rather interesting.
eccentricsimpleton 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
everyone - WE NEED TO PUT AN END TO SPAMMING. post this on 20 other videos and maybe spammers will get the message.
drewbud315 4 years ago
this is spam
dobby156 4 years ago
It's a joke you nobber!
lochead1 4 years ago
I don't ever remember Dom doing BBC work, but then again the earliest i remember him is the second series of Trigger Happy. =P
BFMBritish 4 years ago
I remember when trigger happy first turned up on the paramount channel, they would normally happen during breaks and be 2 or 3 minutes long at the most. I used to think to myself "Why don't they make a hole program for this stuff?"
Dom jolly isn't as good with the bbc as he was with trigger happy tv.
puretroubleman 4 years ago
By the way, the last post was a reply to conrad12345678910. I know full well it's a made up comedy sketch, I do find it very funny though, as it reminds me of all the rubbish stereotypes that are thrown in our faces all the time.
ALFWEDARF 4 years ago
I think testing drugs on animals is a tragic waste of tasty meat to eat. Evil little hairy fuckers need to be culled. If they have rights then they are equal with us and they are murdering, retarded, incestuous twisted little bastards and deserve to die. Kill all animals they have it coming.
chunkylimey 4 years ago
was that real or staged??
conrad12345678910 4 years ago
It's staged, I'm an animal liberationist and I know people in the ALF and they are ordinary people. Most of which detest the idea of violence to people. They dont talk in a thick headed tone either. I do love Dom Joly though, he is great.
ALFWEDARF 4 years ago
So is that why they publish the addresses of scientists who work with animals so morons can go put fire bombs under their cars?
alimitchell30 4 years ago
ali> No, they publish the addresses of these animal abusers so that people can go and protest outside their houses and hopefully make them think about their cruel actions. And 'Scientists'? They are anything but proffesionals and some of the brave few have spoken out against their own kind to expose the fraud of the vivisection industry. It kills us and animals. Please find out before you comment.
ALFWEDARF 4 years ago
How the hell can you say that scientists are "anything but proffesionals"?! They just do their job, they don't need asses like you terrorising them. How does animal testing kill us? It's saved thousands and thousands of lifes! Do some research and stop listening to the media.
fiiishh 4 years ago
fiiishh> I did not say that scientist's weren't profesionals, I said that Animal scientists are anything but professionals and it's true. You really need to find out for yourself before you take an animal tested and approved drug and end up with a life threatening condition. And what you said before was a contradiction, it's the media who actually share your view. The truth is very rarely exposed by them.
ALFWEDARF 4 years ago
I study science so I actually DO know what I am talking about. Almost all drugs need to be tested on animals, I haven't heard of any drugs that have been tested on animals and kill people! You seem to be missing my point, when the media talk about the "bad side" of animal testing they always show the extreme cases of animals being neglected but this rarely happens.
fiiishh 4 years ago 3
I don't know any 'ordinary people' who set buildings on fire.
Punk7680 4 years ago
Not if it
a) Happens to you
b) Happens to anyone you know
or
c) Have the emotional intelligence greater than that of a second form schoolboy
strummerino 4 years ago
Ive been to manchester and the people were better than you. Sad git who post things to make him feel better.
kingbob1875 4 years ago
fuck off have you even been to manchester?
shitehawk1234 4 years ago
up the ALF!!! people who risk everything to try and save humans from themselves
traps3sp 4 years ago
CHEEEEEEEEEEEEESE
nikc1234 4 years ago
I fakin hate people who use knifes in fights or anything for that matter, use ya fists the all natural weapon.
kreeddem 4 years ago
Err. How how does a Dom Jolly sketch taking the mickey out of wacko anarchic animal rights protesters turn into a frantic dicussion on cosmetics and bunny rabbit eyeballs. It's women who perpetuate the animal experiments in their quest for vanity, if we ban women we can solve the problem!
wibblywobbly1 4 years ago
Or you could ban men... the large majority of the people who test on the animals. Now that would solve the problem.
All joking aside, animal experimenters experient not only for make up, but all sorts of products that all people use. Luckly, there is a large variety of vegan, cruelty free products one can buy.
CarolX2 4 years ago
This si absolutely true, honest!!! Let's just think - 36%?! Right. Have you a source for this mindless example of misinformation professor? Now I'm not saying Manchester's great, but why spam unrelated videos with alleged facts which are, quite frankly, laughable!! Incidentally, how do you distinguish the cause of death for people who have died from a combination of latent heart disease, brought to a head in gun-crime-related incident?
intelligentenduser 4 years ago
So its ok so long as the rabbit doesnt die! Thats ridiculous. What about the suffering it causes. What iheartspain said is completely true btw. Most animal rights people are actually vegan and respect life including human. They want to see the end of suffering not cause more of it. If they do use pipe bombs its to cause damage to property not people. Property that is used to cause harm and suffering.
blackmetta 4 years ago
Right iheartspain you taken it a lil too far they dont make em die they do it till the rabbit actually beigns to die, not when its dead.
junaid33 4 years ago
These animal rights people turn me off when they get all emotional.
BoiledBunny 4 years ago
SOMETIMES ME LIKE TOUCH MYSELF
syndroma 4 years ago
Yup.
:D
HyperPhantomCow 4 years ago
they are making a joke out of something that is very serious. they do not just put makeup on rabbits. they put it directly into the rabbits eye for days and days while the make up eats away their eyes and causes them intense pain. they force them to eat the makeup and they keep doing that until a certain percentage die...don't buy from companies who think that is okay. there are many companies who also test on CATS AND DOGS!
iheartspain 4 years ago
Sounds fun.
HyperPhantomCow 4 years ago
They are making fun of the kind of complete moron who thinks that blowing people up to highlight the practice of testing on animals is acceptable.
hyabusa887 4 years ago
If that's what it takes, I don't see how it isn't acceptable.
kyleNI 4 years ago
How many animal rights activists have killed people? Zero. How many animals AND people have animal testers killed? Millions.
CarolX2 4 years ago
Actually, billions.
CarolX2 4 years ago
Ill kill as many animals as I want and theres bugger all you can do about it why not try and campaign on something important
kingbob1875 4 years ago
I do believe animal rights campaigning is important. There's no logical reason to believe otherwise.
CarolX2 4 years ago
i agree
ateist 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Do some research before you comment retard.
hyabusa887 4 years ago
you sir are breaking the law
monkeyah 4 years ago