HAHAHAHAHAH YOU'RE PATHETIC !! WHO THE FUCK HAS PARKED THE BUS IN THE PENALTY IN THIS GAME?? CHELSEA?? PLEASE... BARCELONA PLAYED NOTHING IN THIS GAME !! AND OF COURSE IF THE REF GAVE THE PENALTY HERE, BARCELONA WOULD HAVE COUNTERED ATTACKED AND SCORED F_O_R S_U_R_E - PATHETIC
OMG !! What a blind bastard wants to say that was a handball !! omg really . Ive not seen anybody more ridicoulus than this in football.
Bullshit , bullshit , bullshit.
Eto'o PLAYED nice volleyball block. DOESN't ,matter that was in the penalty area. yeap? of course not. Because it's not possible to give a penalty against small midgets from Barcelona. They could play with their hands because they are just the midgets , yes ? They lack of height so the referee let them play with fucking han
Omg....u are blind . The ball hit Ballack's abdomen. What a moron wants to convince anybody that is a handball ?????
"Eto'o on the other hand blocked a shot with his ellbow accidentally and nothing about his hands looked unnatural. " - Of course. LET's play volleyball ]: - >
U can believe me or not, but actually i don't give a shit about it, but to be honest with you I hate Barcelona and Chelsea either.
But it doesn't make make me blind.
He should have been sent off earlier. What do I mean ? For foul on Drogba in the penalty area when ha attacked not the ball but touched Drogba's legs holding his shirt at the same time finally causing losing his balance and finally fall down on the pitch.
@Dyniarka Read the rules again, in no part of the rules can you read "if the hand are in a unatural position its a foul" it actually says that. The rule are as following for handball
- the movement of the hand to the ball(not the ball to the hand)
- the distance between the opponent and the ball
- the position of the hand does not necessarily mean that there is a infrigement
- touching the ball with object (clothing,shins etc)
@Dyniarka as you can see with the rules, that means that piqués is not a handball, because its clearly ball to hand. There is actually more of a case in ballacks handball cause you can see that he moves his hand to the ball.
@soulen675 you are a fucking moron if u are saying this is a penalty and eto's and pique's is not! this is not a penalty at all! and a die hard juve fan wants to say u this, fuck u and fuck barca! Pathetic!
@999LightBeam666 Never said that this was a penalty, I said that there was MORE OF A CASE in this, because the rules clearly specific says that THE HAND TO THE BALL and seeing as ballack moved his hand to the ball while pique didn't(Eto'o im not so sure about)....
@soulen675 my friend, the distance is the key here, eto's is 100% penalty, pique's hand blocked the ball path but ballack didnt coz it was going to hit his body anyway if not his hand, and the distance was so close while pique's and eto's was not that close
@999LightBeam666 But in pique's case you are forgetting that pique didn't move his hand, and the rule says specific that the hand HAS TO MOVE to the ball for it to be a handball, eto'o case you might be right, but in pique's case im pretty sure that its no penalty.
omg, posting this video is just dumb. Please learn the football rules will ya? Just because it touches the hand i doesnt mean it's a pen. It depends on the where the hand is. His hand was held into his body, and it doesnt make his shape wider like Piques hand did. I get ready for stupid flames, but i'm to to a dicussion...
the first match in barcelona barça played with 10 a lot of time because of the red card of abidal wich for real is yellow card to anelka,he was faking. and there was absolutely a penalty for henry and this handball from ballack . so the score is settled .
the first match in barcelona barça played with 10 a lot of time because of the red card of abidal wich for real is yellow card to anelka,he was faking.and there was a penalty to henry very clear,so what with that!?dont cry can you remember the chelsea 4 fcbarcelona 2 where carvalho was holding valdes to let terry score?baaah cry chelsea cryy
if u actually watched it he clipped his ankle and in FOOTBALL that is a foul, u obviously don't understand FOOTBALL u silly yank cunt, like i said go watch baseball or basketball yank cunt
stop bulshittin', download first game, watch it, then watch the second game and say if chelsea dominated barca as catalans did it in the first leg. And then take a paper, grab a pen and note down all wrong referee decisions, form both games which hurted both teams. After you do that, we can talk
alves was covering his face (sure he is happy that wasn't a penalty) also henry should got a penalty in the 1st leg (at barca) so isn't it 3:3 !!!!(AT camp nou {barca 1:0 chealse} AT England {chelsea 3:2 barca } ) so barca qualafies (i didn't mention abidal's red card too)
LOL ...don't be STUPID. Are u all blind ? it's clear stomach.
MESSI didn't protest even at all, because he knew that the ball hit Ballack's stomach.
NO OBJECTIVITY from you.....Complete blindness.
BARCELONA DIDN't deserve to go to the final. I know a few friends who are Barca's supporters and they admit that Barcelona WAS very lucky thanks to Ovrebo !!!!!!!!!!! Be such like them and don't be blind pals
Yeah, well then you're friends are stupid. Barca was lucky because of Iniesta and so was Chelsea with that lucky Essien shot, the red card for Abidal and there were some (I say some) points where Barca should have got penalties. (Especially in the first leg.)
hahahah.......U are right. Etoo's hanball was not intetional. But this one was obviously . Omg....hahahaha....Ballack Should have got red card and penalty.
After Eto's hanball should have got red card too.
OBJECTIVITY pals.
Ask neutral fans not you each other . NEUTRAL FANS are objective. Not u. OMG
neutral fans don't know shit about football, sort of szpakowski, they think Valdes is worse than boruc and sum up semifinals after watching only one game
the anti football I saw over the 2 games came from the team who could not manage 1 shot on goal in normal time, not 1, oh and by the way the ball hit Ballacks stomach, enjoy your win Barca but dont thank your players or Pep, thank Mr Overbo, he got you there
Stomach? Are you blind or stupid? Barca had´nt shot on goal over 2 games? Barca was so much better in the first match and had a few very good chances.
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA, so the pique and ballack hand balls cancel each other out, therefore Chelsea should have had no penalties, and Barca one in the first leg
jajajajajaja, handball i knew i saw it at the bridge. Jajajaja serve'em right Chelsea for play bad and boring defensive football. VIsca Barca y a por el triplete.
P.S. Chelsea fans are a bunch of savages, the bastards try to lynch us Barcelona fans outside the stadium after game. I guess you guys do indeed deserve a diver like Drogba
are u fucking blind? it hit his hand!! go get some prescription glasses...or you know what...doesn't matter we're in the final and you're not...eat your heart out!!
Drogba can't sleep at night cause he's afraid Iniesta is in the closet. LOL
how can u compare 4+ penalties to one u fucking gay? and in addition its a referee decision because ballack hand didnt disturbe the movement of the ball as it would it his stomach anyways
i have to agree with you all, everyone is saying how chelsea lost the game because of the ref but thats not totally true, barca was also cheated out of a penalty in the first leg, and this hand ball by ballack should also have been a penalty, people should examine both sides faults before jumping to conclusion and makig ridiculous claims like barca bribed the ref..ahah wow.
anyway barca is through and we should stop talking about this game
Interesting, barca were deserved winners, even with a weakened team, and then with a player sent off! But i worry for the final, without alves, abidal and maybe Henry!
Barca was punished by the refereee in the first match, they should have got a penalty + red card for ballack, then in the second leg wouldňt be controversy, but still: There were two clear penalties: pique + Ballack, then unfair red card and the only other questionable penalty is the very first foul on malouda, but it started outside in my opinion.
And many Chelsea fans forget that Henry was dragged down to the ground in the first leg. How Chelsea fans can feel sympathetic for themselves after playing anti-football for 180 minutes and also being on the positve end of a bad refereeing decision is shocking. Well done Barca, cracking goal too.
Barca is so hated today. Not because of cheating as the haters claims. Simply cuz they are superior.
miras123451 8 months ago
HAHAHAHAHAH YOU'RE PATHETIC !! WHO THE FUCK HAS PARKED THE BUS IN THE PENALTY IN THIS GAME?? CHELSEA?? PLEASE... BARCELONA PLAYED NOTHING IN THIS GAME !! AND OF COURSE IF THE REF GAVE THE PENALTY HERE, BARCELONA WOULD HAVE COUNTERED ATTACKED AND SCORED F_O_R S_U_R_E - PATHETIC
ChelseaLondon11 11 months ago
What makes it all the more hypocritical was the way that ballack acted towards the ref when he claimed there was a handball. Fucking punkass player
dommy531 1 year ago
What makes it all the more hypocritical was the way that ballack acted towards the ref when he claimed there was a handball. Fucking punkass player
dommy531 1 year ago
OMG !! What a blind bastard wants to say that was a handball !! omg really . Ive not seen anybody more ridicoulus than this in football.
Bullshit , bullshit , bullshit.
Eto'o PLAYED nice volleyball block. DOESN't ,matter that was in the penalty area. yeap? of course not. Because it's not possible to give a penalty against small midgets from Barcelona. They could play with their hands because they are just the midgets , yes ? They lack of height so the referee let them play with fucking han
Dyniarka 1 year ago
Omg....u are blind . The ball hit Ballack's abdomen. What a moron wants to convince anybody that is a handball ?????
"Eto'o on the other hand blocked a shot with his ellbow accidentally and nothing about his hands looked unnatural. " - Of course. LET's play volleyball ]: - >
Dyniarka 1 year ago
Comment removed
DonFarshido 1 year ago
U can believe me or not, but actually i don't give a shit about it, but to be honest with you I hate Barcelona and Chelsea either.
But it doesn't make make me blind.
He should have been sent off earlier. What do I mean ? For foul on Drogba in the penalty area when ha attacked not the ball but touched Drogba's legs holding his shirt at the same time finally causing losing his balance and finally fall down on the pitch.
Dyniarka 1 year ago
Comment removed
DonFarshido 1 year ago
Pleas stop bullshitting. U can;t say that Pique's handball or Eto'os one looked nearly the same.
In this situation Ballack's hand was along his body touching.
Quite contrary to Pique and Eto'o ?
U wouldn't have been so brave and talkative now if Ovrebo had given penalties which Chelsea deserved
And do not try to estimate which team was more hurt by Ovrebo, beacuse it looks very ridiculous
Dyniarka 1 year ago
Comment removed
DonFarshido 1 year ago
Comment removed
DonFarshido 1 year ago
@Dyniarka Read the rules again, in no part of the rules can you read "if the hand are in a unatural position its a foul" it actually says that. The rule are as following for handball
- the movement of the hand to the ball(not the ball to the hand)
- the distance between the opponent and the ball
- the position of the hand does not necessarily mean that there is a infrigement
- touching the ball with object (clothing,shins etc)
- hitting the ball with a object.
soulen675 11 months ago
@Dyniarka as you can see with the rules, that means that piqués is not a handball, because its clearly ball to hand. There is actually more of a case in ballacks handball cause you can see that he moves his hand to the ball.
soulen675 11 months ago
@soulen675 you are a fucking moron if u are saying this is a penalty and eto's and pique's is not! this is not a penalty at all! and a die hard juve fan wants to say u this, fuck u and fuck barca! Pathetic!
999LightBeam666 9 months ago
@999LightBeam666 Never said that this was a penalty, I said that there was MORE OF A CASE in this, because the rules clearly specific says that THE HAND TO THE BALL and seeing as ballack moved his hand to the ball while pique didn't(Eto'o im not so sure about)....
soulen675 9 months ago
@soulen675 my friend, the distance is the key here, eto's is 100% penalty, pique's hand blocked the ball path but ballack didnt coz it was going to hit his body anyway if not his hand, and the distance was so close while pique's and eto's was not that close
999LightBeam666 9 months ago
@999LightBeam666 But in pique's case you are forgetting that pique didn't move his hand, and the rule says specific that the hand HAS TO MOVE to the ball for it to be a handball, eto'o case you might be right, but in pique's case im pretty sure that its no penalty.
soulen675 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@soulen675 plus he was moving his hand to the ball not intentionally ,, he didnt mean it nd the movement was part of his body reaction
999LightBeam666 9 months ago
Comment removed
999LightBeam666 9 months ago
i hate this fukin player ballack he's snobby and he's a piece of shit.
rescuer1983 1 year ago
thats a clear pen and the right team went to the final ofc. ovrebo almost cost the whole game for barca when he give red to abidal lol..
Meszillinho 2 years ago
did the ball touch his hand..see in the zoom view ..fools barca fans,,
amalnivin 2 years ago
omg, posting this video is just dumb. Please learn the football rules will ya? Just because it touches the hand i doesnt mean it's a pen. It depends on the where the hand is. His hand was held into his body, and it doesnt make his shape wider like Piques hand did. I get ready for stupid flames, but i'm to to a dicussion...
Zagora1655 2 years ago
penaltyy
pretoo666 2 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It's a shame that nowdays teams like Barcelona have to pay a referee to win:/
sarcek93 2 years ago
Everybody who is neutral fan is laughing with all your reasoning. You can convince yourselves each other but nobody else.
Objectivity doesn;t hurt. Really...
Trust me and open your eyes
Dyniarka 2 years ago
the first match in barcelona barça played with 10 a lot of time because of the red card of abidal wich for real is yellow card to anelka,he was faking. and there was absolutely a penalty for henry and this handball from ballack . so the score is settled .
mash5oo6RKO 2 years ago
the first match in barcelona barça played with 10 a lot of time because of the red card of abidal wich for real is yellow card to anelka,he was faking.and there was a penalty to henry very clear,so what with that!?dont cry can you remember the chelsea 4 fcbarcelona 2 where carvalho was holding valdes to let terry score?baaah cry chelsea cryy
riquer1981 2 years ago
cheslea sucks abidal should of never gotten the red card in the 1st place becuz anelka clearly dived
juniorthug1 2 years ago
how was it a dive u silly yank cunt, go watch basketball of baseball n stop glory hunting u silly cunt, bet u've never been spain
wrekadizzle 2 years ago
suck a cock anelka fdived u cunt
juniorthug1 2 years ago
if u actually watched it he clipped his ankle and in FOOTBALL that is a foul, u obviously don't understand FOOTBALL u silly yank cunt, like i said go watch baseball or basketball yank cunt
wrekadizzle 2 years ago
having luck isn't not deserving to go further
stop bulshittin', download first game, watch it, then watch the second game and say if chelsea dominated barca as catalans did it in the first leg. And then take a paper, grab a pen and note down all wrong referee decisions, form both games which hurted both teams. After you do that, we can talk
gdjtrjfkjhilkuy 2 years ago
I did it.
From 2 matches Barcelona deserved 1 penalty.
Chelsea 4 penalties.
One red card for Ballack in 85 min.
One red card for Abidal for foul on Drogba in penalty area
Cards 1 - 1
Penalties : 4:1 ( Chelsea- Barcelona)
Something else ?
Dyniarka 2 years ago
alves was covering his face (sure he is happy that wasn't a penalty) also henry should got a penalty in the 1st leg (at barca) so isn't it 3:3 !!!!(AT camp nou {barca 1:0 chealse} AT England {chelsea 3:2 barca } ) so barca qualafies (i didn't mention abidal's red card too)
mash5oo6RKO 2 years ago 3
@Dyniarka
4 penaltys dude are you crazy?
Meszillinho 1 year ago
LOL ...don't be STUPID. Are u all blind ? it's clear stomach.
MESSI didn't protest even at all, because he knew that the ball hit Ballack's stomach.
NO OBJECTIVITY from you.....Complete blindness.
BARCELONA DIDN't deserve to go to the final. I know a few friends who are Barca's supporters and they admit that Barcelona WAS very lucky thanks to Ovrebo !!!!!!!!!!! Be such like them and don't be blind pals
Dyniarka 2 years ago
Yeah, well then you're friends are stupid. Barca was lucky because of Iniesta and so was Chelsea with that lucky Essien shot, the red card for Abidal and there were some (I say some) points where Barca should have got penalties. (Especially in the first leg.)
InflictingRage 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hahahah .....handball ????????
Lol
funny Barca...supporters omg...
hanball ?
It's clear stomach....fucking lucky Barcelona's bastards
Dyniarka 2 years ago
niedowidzisz chłopie
you're damn blind as i can actually see
gdjtrjfkjhilkuy 2 years ago
hahahah.......U are right. Etoo's hanball was not intetional. But this one was obviously . Omg....hahahaha....Ballack Should have got red card and penalty.
After Eto's hanball should have got red card too.
OBJECTIVITY pals.
Ask neutral fans not you each other . NEUTRAL FANS are objective. Not u. OMG
I AM NOT FAN OF BARCA and Chelsea either.
Dyniarka 2 years ago
neutral fans don't know shit about football, sort of szpakowski, they think Valdes is worse than boruc and sum up semifinals after watching only one game
gdjtrjfkjhilkuy 2 years ago
the anti football I saw over the 2 games came from the team who could not manage 1 shot on goal in normal time, not 1, oh and by the way the ball hit Ballacks stomach, enjoy your win Barca but dont thank your players or Pep, thank Mr Overbo, he got you there
Avaduthura 2 years ago
Stomach? Are you blind or stupid? Barca had´nt shot on goal over 2 games? Barca was so much better in the first match and had a few very good chances.
WalinHey 2 years ago
I think thats a question more appropriate for Mr Tom Henning fucking Ovriebo, Platini's shill
Avaduthura 2 years ago
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA, so the pique and ballack hand balls cancel each other out, therefore Chelsea should have had no penalties, and Barca one in the first leg
ftballfrk 2 years ago 2
yeah! and what about: watch?v=4mli0x6vuxQ !!!!!!!
JamesBond0034 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
idiot it hit his stomach ..
even if this was penalty .. 2-1 for barca
if all others were penalties ... 5-2 for chelsea
kagayohosnow 2 years ago
jajajajajaja, handball i knew i saw it at the bridge. Jajajaja serve'em right Chelsea for play bad and boring defensive football. VIsca Barca y a por el triplete.
P.S. Chelsea fans are a bunch of savages, the bastards try to lynch us Barcelona fans outside the stadium after game. I guess you guys do indeed deserve a diver like Drogba
seiya42 2 years ago 2
It's a DISGRACE!! that a player of the caliber of Drogba can miss such an easy one on one against Valdes...stop crying like a girl... CHELSEA
ShawnShady76 2 years ago 3
Yeah Maby i can score those chances
cokiesQ8 2 years ago
are u fucking blind? it hit his hand!! go get some prescription glasses...or you know what...doesn't matter we're in the final and you're not...eat your heart out!!
Drogba can't sleep at night cause he's afraid Iniesta is in the closet. LOL
ShawnShady76 2 years ago 3
that hit his stomach at 43 secs u bastard WTF?
NUMBAKSARESHIT 2 years ago
itsnot a hand ball panalty bitch !!! who posted this is a retard moron !!!
iphonel2 2 years ago
how is that a hand ball. dick !
jasper1886 2 years ago
how can u compare 4+ penalties to one u fucking gay? and in addition its a referee decision because ballack hand didnt disturbe the movement of the ball as it would it his stomach anyways
yahavx 2 years ago
it wasent hand u idiot it was on he's stomach , and his hands was on his body so it cant be FUCKING HAND BOLL
libanon91 2 years ago
are you fucking blinde or stupid look close at 43 sec
and then see the different with eto hands
movienight 2 years ago
Thanks for posting this .. I actually thought I saw the handball during the game .. but to see it so clearly now is just great!
RPatUTUBE 2 years ago 3
i have to agree with you all, everyone is saying how chelsea lost the game because of the ref but thats not totally true, barca was also cheated out of a penalty in the first leg, and this hand ball by ballack should also have been a penalty, people should examine both sides faults before jumping to conclusion and makig ridiculous claims like barca bribed the ref..ahah wow.
anyway barca is through and we should stop talking about this game
avaks55 2 years ago 2
Interesting, barca were deserved winners, even with a weakened team, and then with a player sent off! But i worry for the final, without alves, abidal and maybe Henry!
robrev7 2 years ago 2
Barca was punished by the refereee in the first match, they should have got a penalty + red card for ballack, then in the second leg wouldňt be controversy, but still: There were two clear penalties: pique + Ballack, then unfair red card and the only other questionable penalty is the very first foul on malouda, but it started outside in my opinion.
OT1990 2 years ago 5
And many Chelsea fans forget that Henry was dragged down to the ground in the first leg. How Chelsea fans can feel sympathetic for themselves after playing anti-football for 180 minutes and also being on the positve end of a bad refereeing decision is shocking. Well done Barca, cracking goal too.
juniormessi 2 years ago 2