@TheRunescapeBot2010 You blind? It moves because the astronaut is pushing it into the ground, just as you'd stick a flag on a windless day on earth, you'd rotate the stick slightly one way and the other and push down.
If I hear a single idiot who mentioning Kubrick or any conspiracy crap, I'll punch him in the face. Please enjoy this fabulous humankind achievement and leave the conspiracy bullshit to cheap, retard websites.
@tristancalin Kubrick was employed to make backup fake footage in case the mission failed... I think that's where a lot of people dismiss the conspiracy... maybe they did land, maybe they didn't... I think they did, but I also think, they had made backup fake footage in case of catastrophe, because the stakes against the Russians were way too high at the time, off the chart. And the American government (as shown by numereous broken Indian treaties) is in no way above playing dirty pool.
@ParadiseOnLand Funny you should mention it, there are NO pictures of a gigantic, intricately-fabricated moon ball! Unless you mean the picture of the three astronauts with their helmets off in front of a 3m moon ball.
@ParadiseOnLand Well, you can hardly call it incompetence to send 26 astronauts to the Moon and back. And then HUNDREDS of astronauts to the space station.
@BjornPalmen Oh Man. Xismist is lacking greatly in research skills. How does he explain the telecast logs independantly documented which show that only one telecast of the moonwalk happened in Australia, or that it was switched to the international feed (including Goldstone in California) once Parkes kicked in? Or that it occured at the time which was nowhere near "late at night"?Perhaps the coke- woman got confused into thinking the hot midday Australian sun was really the night sky moon?
@Dstevenb Xismxist has only one idea: that the telecast was faked. This is proven by the appearance of a CocaCola-bottle which cannot exist on the Moon. So his idea is very shaky to begin with, especially as he claims that this bottle was somehow edited out, so we cannot look at it anymore.
Amazing how they filmed this "one small step" in 1969 with the 1930's quality when in fact they already had the 1969's technology inside the capsel & LM.
@xismxist "Amazing how they filmed this "one small step" in 1969 with the 1930's quality when in fact they already had the 1969's technology inside the capsel & LM".
Beaming LIVE TV from the moon to the earth is "1930s quality"?
Of course, the colour film they brought back gives a much better picture. It's disadvantage over a TV link was that they had to bring it back with them before anyone could watch it!
@BjornPalmen it was FILMED, because the astronots "went out from the lm" many, many hours earlier than NASAS announced time, but all tv stations only knew the announced time so they recorded the "first step" in their tracking stations in Australia and LATER send it out to the rest of the world, only Australia got to see the LIVE footage by mistake and there we could see the coke bottle, which was ofcourse edited out later.
@xismxist "all tv stations only knew the announced time so they..."
You must think that "all tv stations" were stupid indeed. We were all waiting for Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin to come out.
The Australian lady who saw the "coke bottle" also said that she had to stay up late. Actually the landing occurred at day time in Australia. So she is lying.
@BjornPalmen While the rest of the world was waiting, Australia had already seen it live by mistake and this was very late/early morning. Later when the recorded edited public version came out it was indeed day in Australia... she is telling the truth. YOU on the other hand together with Windley, Plait and the rest of the propagandNUTS are proven liars
@xismxist OK so she saw the Coke LATER. You say yourself that it was "later when the recorded edited public version came". Obviously there was a Coca-Cola commercial inserted. That broadcast did not come from the Moon, even though the lady stayed up all night to see it.
@BjornPalmen OMFG are u slow your SOB?! i will repeat u idiot: she stayed up late/early to see the LIVE footage (COKE included) but later in the public version that was send to the rest of the world (u know what that means?) the coke was edited out. How many more times need i repeat this ur FUCKING SLOW DICKHEAD?
@xismxist The live footage was in the afternoon. She said it was late at night. That was not accurate.
And it beats me why anyone would edit in or out a Coke bottle? She was the only one in all Australia who says she saw a bottle. There was a Coca-Cola commercial on at the other channel.
@BjornPalmen IT WASNT! edited version was in the afternoon! do the time differences right and you will see that the LIVE footage was either very late or very early australian time. Some of her friends saw the bottle as well, and it was in the newspapers too
@xismxist This is what the Honeysuckle Creek astronomers reported:
"At 1112 AEST the Moon rose above the gum-tree clad mountains to the east beside Deadman’s Hill and the receivers promptly locked onto a strong signal from the lunar surface. On the Moon Armstrong and Aldrin were slowly hurrying into their EVA suits in the cramped space of the LM’s cabin. At 1139 AEST, 27 minutes after we had acquired the LM’s signal, Aldrin reached for the handle to open the hatch.">>>
@xismxist >>> "At Honeysuckle, television technician Ed von Renouard heard Aldrin say the circuit breaker was in and suddenly, at 1254 AEST, an image appeared. Houston TV: “Roger, thank you. All stations, we have just switched video to Honeysuckle.”
At 2156:20 USCDT, July 20 (1256:20 AEST July 21 1969) 38 year old Neil Alden Armstrong from Wapakoneta, Ohio, USA, stepped onto the lunar surface and spoke those immortal words:
“That’s one small step for a man…. one giant leap for mankind.”
@BjornPalmen WRONG. 21:56 was when the TAPED version was shown to rest of the world, that was the recorded television time and nothing else. The LIVE event took place many, many hours earlier and equal with late night / early morning in Australia. Neil and Buzz stated themself that they went out from the lander several hours before the announced time (NASA did recomend some sleep first but they ignored it) so they had to record the "first step" and later show it at the announced time.
@xismxist21:56 USCDT is 12:56 AEST and Neil Armstrong is coming out of the LM.
There was no LIVE event "many, many hours earlier". You are just incorrect. This is the LIVE event.
Honeysuckle Creek is lucky because the moon had just risen. I TOLD YOU ALL THIS ALREADY.
The lady COULD NOT have seen the live broadcast at "late night / early morning" because it was on at 12:56 AEST which is early afternoon. Your witness is lying. Sorry.
@BjornPalmen If a were you i wouldnt get that excited about NASA LOGS, especially after seing "the little gem" - logs dont match the claimed footage and vice versa, video cutting constantly etc, and so even with this case. I dont buy anything in these bullshitlogs because NASA like you and your propagandafriends, is proven liars
@BjornPalmen If the "moon walk" (studio walk) really took place 12:56 aus time / 21:56 us time then the television broadcasts must had take place several hours later, which would been early morning in the USA (because it wasnt LIVE) but that was never the case. Try to understand that what they saw on televsion was TAPED. The facsts are clear: the old woman was right all the time because 12:56 in Australia was when the taped version was shown, but she saw the LIVE footage several hours earlier...
It happened 12.56 local time in eastern oz. Signal received from the moon at both Parks radio telescope and Tidbinbilla deep space tracking station.
Both these facilities were manned mostly by Australian post grad students. Are you suggesting they were all in on a hoax? With so much bitterness going on over Vietnam how many of those young intelligent people do you think would have lied over such a thing?
@TheSpiritof1969 OMFG are you even for real?! Need i even mention that both these facilities is owned by NASA? so faking it was the easiest part, how can you believe in something who lacks any kind of independend verification?
@BjornPalmen Watch the little gem before i can go any further with you! it proves that the logs doesnt match the video, i bet you havent seen it yet? Soviets lunochods was sending pics to Jodrell Bank, does that prove it was kosmonauts on the moon too?! tell me who the first russian on the moon was!!!!!!! fucking IDIOT, you cant even accept the fact that the "FIRST STEP" WASNT LIVE BUT RECORDED
"Soviets lunochods was sending pics to Jodrell Bank, does that prove it was kosmonauts on the moon too?"
The lunachods did not talk to each other and to Baikonur. That would have proved it.
I really do not think that it would have been possible to postpone the first steps on the Moon and only send out a recording later. The Australians would never have been silent about that. And we KNOW the first steps were broadcasted from the Moon without any delay. Give it up!
@BjornPalmen Keep your eyes open! the video was so devastating so it was removed from utub and Jarrahs first account suspended (for what?! NASA is public domain) "The Australians would never have been silent about that" - no they didnt! where have u been?! already forgot the coke bottle?! There has never EVER been any kind of independent verifications when it comes to the "moon landing" so postpone the first steps was easier than u even can imagine
@xismxist "never EVER been any kind of independent verifications"
You are very unlucky with your statements! The crew at Honeysuckle Creek Observatory were Australian students. And they had to wait for moonrise, a completely independent verification that this was a broadcast FROM THE MOON.
@BjornPalmen HAHA your FUCKING LIAR! WIll it never end for you?! the crew was about 100 and of these 100 it was only a HANDFUL of australians... (need i even mention that the others were from USA?) WOW so much for your independend verifications caims! you can hear it yourself from 24s in this clip watch?v=kkmNxCgPRtk&feature=related
@BjornPalmen I said: The crew at Honeysuckle Creek Observatory were Australian students. And they had to wait for moonrise, a completely independent verification that this was a broadcast FROM THE MOON.
YOU SAID: the crew was about 100 and of these 100 it was only a HANDFUL of australians
The truth is of course that almost everybody was Australian. Only a handful were not.
@xismxist "already forgot the coke bottle?" YES! And you should too. There never was a coke bottle at midnight in Eastern Australia, live or recorded. It was a very clumsy lie. I cannot see why you fell for it. All the footage is still available on YouTube. THERE IS NO COKE BOTTLE, not even a Sprite.
@xismxist Yes that video really said a lot. The woman that sees coke bottles on the Moon has now moved from Eastern to Western Australia and a small moon rock is now a glass bottle. No reflections of light from the glass are seen, however. The bottle is then changed into an army issue drinking flask.
If THIS is you basis for calling me a liar, how about your witness, who now, relocated to Western Australia(!), still "has to stay up late" to catch a broadcast at 1 p.m. in the afternoon. BS!
@BjornPalmen Canged?! its TWO(2) bottles on the fake lunar set, you cant even understand what they says even when its a pic to the sound... i feel sorry for you
@xismxist Exactly why do you think that this was an old woman? After all, she stayed up all night to see a broadcast which was on at noon, 12:56 AEST. Old women do not do that and old women generally tell the truth and do not make up stories about coke bottles and nightly broadcasts.
@BjornPalmen It was two broadcasts in Australia (one live, other one recorded & edited) what part of that dont you understand? if 12:56 was the first one, then the second must been on the evening several hours later which doesnt add upp. NASA(and you) is the liars here so i wouldnt trust a word they says, especially with their proven history background of editing logs and videos
@BjornPalmen If it wasnt 2 broadcasts then how could the first version contain the bottle while the second version dident? according to NASA, Neil & buzz went out way before shedule but the TV stations(expect some few ones in Australia) was never noticed, THATS WHY they needed to RECORD the "first step" how many times must u have this PROVEN FACT repeated?
@xismxist The first moonwalk was a live broadcast from the Moon. There was only one version. No bottle was seen. The lady is mistaken about the "bottle". There is a lens flare moving rapidly over the screen. It could possibly be mistaken for a bottle (but one cannot tell if it is Coke Regular or Coke Light). The lady was dreaming the whole thing, maybe thats why she thinks it was on at night. It wasn't, The moonwalk started at 12:56 afternoon.
@BjornPalmen Nope! go ahead and prove it then (wait, u cant even prove man has walk on the moon) answer, if it wasnt 2 broadcoasts then ENTIRE world was watching the "first step" LIVE which wasnt the case, it was RECORDED u dumbshit! AUSTRALIA SAW IT FIRST, thats a proven fact!
@BjornPalmen they did, u fucking dipshit idiot! your nothing else than a proven liar. Ni video recorder? what about the fact that they used the "16-millimeter Data Acquisition Camera" to record the separation at the dark side on the moon, IDIOT
@xismxist The 16-millimeter Data Acquisition Camera was not a videorecorder. It worked with film, 16-millimeter film, which had to be developed in Houston.
A video recorder has the button PLAY. No such button on a 16 mm camera, The camera cannot play back undeveloped film. And it did not. And as there was no video recorder there could not be anything RECORDED.
So what you suggest is impossible. There was no way to play back 16 mm film.
@BjornPalmen you still dont understand! if they couldnt record it, then how could we see the material first when they "came back" to earth? but guess what, your right about one part... they didnt need to record it, because we saw the RECORDED separation(!) (at the dark side of the moon...) in LIVE tv(!).... yeah they really screwed it up /watch?v=kYd1d7a12eI
@BjornPalmen Lunochods also send signals from the moon (because they were there, moron) so according to you, it has been kosmonauts on the moon! can you tell me WHO and WHEN? no excuses
@xismxist "logs dont match the claimed footage" The whole idea with a log is that the log records what is going on. What do you mean by video cutting constantly?? Video cutting ON THE MOON? On the moon??
Constantly??? This is not accurate at all. You can see in the interior shots from the Lunar Module that there is no "video cutting" equipment whatsoever in the LM. Completely inaccurate, a fantasy,
@BjornPalmen How can they have an UNinterrupted log with a CUTTED footage? camera cuts several times in "the little gem" - its original NASA footage and everytime they gonna film the earth and then back to interior, it cuts or/and totaly blacks out... but logs arent interrupted at all. You cant have both!!
@xismxist You say: "LIVE footage was either very late or very early Australian time." The truth is 1256:20 AEST July 21 1969. AEST = Australian Eastern Standard Time. Noon! You are so unlucky with your wild guesses!
And you inconvenienced all these ladies, making them watch that coke bottle either very late or very early Australian time. :D
@BjornPalmen OMFG how can someone possible be this slow like you are?! "1256:20 AEST July 21 1969" is the RECORDED public version that the rest of the world saw! the "first step" took place many hours earlier which ONLY Australia saw LIVE! how many times must i repeat that?
@xismxist I told you this was what the Honeysuckle Creek astronomers reported:
"At 1112 AEST the Moon rose above the gum-tree clad mountains to the east beside Deadman’s Hill and the receivers promptly locked onto a strong signal,"
THIS WAS THE SIGNAL FROM THE MOON, n o t from any recording studio.
12:56 is when Neil Armstrong is outside. There is no room for your insane "many hours earlier".
You do not have to repeat your weird ideas, obviously you have no clue to what happened.
@xismxist There was no bottle in the original broadcast, the lady was just making things up.
"6:00 p.m.- With everything in order, Armstrong radios a recommendation that they plan to start the EVA (Extra Vehicular Activity), earlier than originally scheduled, at about 9:00 p.m. EDT."
@xismxist "in fact they already had the 1969's technology inside the capsel & LM" yes but not the bandwidth needed to transmit color tv from the LM. That is because the LM had only a small antenna.
I suppose certain people will want to go back to 'fix' the mistake on the plaque. They know that because of evolution, the lesser evolved people put A.D. on the plaque.
Great example of the communications delay at 1:41. Everything is recorded on earth. Note the pause after "...that doesn't have TV coverage of the scene." Then, you here the word, "scene" picked up by Collins' mic. Approximately 2.5 seconds.
Then, note that when Collins asks about the quality of the TV, the answer is immediate (since it was recorded on earth). Just as it should be.
@ziaullah123456 it only waves when they are holding it. There is no atmosphere on the moon, so as soon as they stopped touching it in any way, it stopped moving.
Moon dust was kicked up the same way it would be on earth.
@BlackRaptor31 Another proven LIAR... no the flag does not only waving when they holding it, but in fact it waves when they run past it "apollo 15 waving flag"
I find it odd that NASA can release this footage. The original Apollo 11 footage was reported missing (it was all the buzz in the news at one time). Maybe they dug this out of Disney Studio archival storage where they faked this in the first place.
@78BlueCamaroZ28 Hubble has never taken a picture of outer space!!! All cgi used before images. Check old sci fi book covers and compare to so called new images of "distant galaxies" from Nasa. LOL. Hubble is used by the DEPT of Defense to look at trouble makers from space. Period!!!!
Mankind really has to go back to the moon to inspire a new generation of people.If we spent a fraction of what we do on 'defence' it would be more than possible and easily justifiable when compared to the tragedies of modern day warfare.The risk of failure is not as great as 5oyrs ago. A united effort is the way forward.
It's fun reading how stupid I am for not believing Apollo went to the moon. Once the truth has been unmasked, all the psychological auto-hypnosis of my opponents are revealed. I love it- that feeling of superiority and power. If you could only realize the ease by which you are being led. The world wants to be deceived. A truth-seeker is by definition in a tiny minority. Peace
@hozayamz This is what psychology wrongly applied makes you come up with. You are anything but a truthseeker. You are completely wrong of course, all those people went to the moon. You think 12 highly trained test pilots all would lie? Who suffers from psychological autohypnosis now?
I remember this day very vividly, July 20, 1969, because it is then that I came to the beautiful United States of America for the first time!!! The whole world was glued to the tubes watching Apollo 11 land on the moon! Long live USA!!!
nice video, i like how the astronauts are invisable. It just shows that two films were laid one on top of another. a still picture of fake moon horizon and a live action astronaut shot of astronaut moving in slow motion. lol
Why did you mark my post on your channel page as spam? Don't you want people to see summaries of hoax evidence? If a theory is wrong, it'll fall by its own lack of merit. Censorship is only necessary when a theory has merit.
"There's a partial summary of hoax evidence posted on a science forum. To see it, google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon". The summary is on page 15. It's the seventh post from the top."
There's a full summary of third-party independent evidence posted on wikipedia. To see it, go to wikipedia and enter 'Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings' The links to all stated evidence exist at the bottom of the page.
There's nothing there that doesn't have an alternative explanation and nothing there makes the hoax evidence go away (Do a YouTube search on "Apollo 15 flag waving").
What's the idea of blocking my FatFreddy88 account?
The evidence presented on this page -"Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings' has all been discussed before. Reflectors on the moon could have been placed by robot craft, pictures of stars taken from the moon could have been taken by robot craft or from an unmanned probe in orbit.
I intend to keep posting here. If I disappear, it's because Phil Plait blocked this account.
Well if they were capable of sending quite advanced robots, then the only real obstacle is the Van Allen Belts, which the ISS passes through regularly without any harm.
What obstacles do you propose stopped them from going to the moon? It seems to be an established fact amongst the scientific community that short trips in cislunar space carry only a low risk from radiation.
"which the ISS passes through regularly without any harm."
It's possible that there is a section of the SS that's well shielded where they can take refuge when they go through that section of the Van Allen belts.
It looks like I'm unblocked now. Thanks for unblocking me.
"Some of the EVAs last 6-7 hours, and astronauts do not take shelter during them."
There are plausible scenarios that would explain this. Do they pass through that section once on every orbit? Maybe we are told that the EVA's last 6-7 hours but it's not true.
Your reasoning is pretty flawed! The EVA's offer zero evidence! All spacecraft and astronauts in low earth orbit are shielded by the earths own protection mechanism, it's electro-magnetic field! So any low earth orbit objects are naturally shielded by this field which protects earth from high levels of dangerous radiation!
"It seems to be an established fact amongst the scientific community that...risk from radiation."
Go to this post and read the part about radiation-
"There's a partial summary of hoax evidence posted on a science forum. To see it, google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon". The summary is on page 15. It's the seventh post from the top."
Because you don't have all your facts straight and Phil knows it! Yes they did REALLY go to the moon and YES, some of the apollo footage is fake! It has been faked to hide evidence of what they reeeeally found when they got to the moon. Ancient structures were being blacked out or just simply airbrushed out of images. They are also lying about mars, phobos and saturns moon Iapetus which appears to be convincingly artificial. NASA is just a PR front for the real militarised space program.
Yes they did REALLY go to the moon and YES, some of the apollo footage is fake! It has been faked to hide evidence of what they reeeeally found when they got to the moon. Ancient structures were being blacked out or just simply airbrushed out of images. They are also lying about mars, phobos and saturns moon Iapetus which appears to be convincingly artificial. NASA is just a PR front for the real militarised space program.
Space shuttle is a flying death trap. It needed to scrapped decades ago, they got anti gravity propulsion working like a charm! NASA is just a PR front for the real space program!
Yes they did REALLY go to the moon and YES, some of the apollo footage is fake! It has been faked to hide evidence of what they reeeeally found when they got to the moon. Ancient structures were being blacked out or just simply airbrushed out of images. They are also lying about mars, phobos and saturns moon Iapetus which appears to be convincingly artificial. NASA is just a PR front for the real militarised space program.
Nope not true. A media pool was organized at Houston and the feed was sent out to all stations via the pool. The pool arrangement was devised WITH the networks together. In Australia and NZ the feed was taken direct from Sydney video - NOT from Houston.
Is it true that American TV networks of the time who wanted to record this moment via a direct link were refused by NASA and asked to just film the screen at mission control?
Here's an original idea: Gather up up all the idiots who don't believe we landed on the moon. Put them on a spacecraft and land them on the moon. They won't believe it, of course, so then open the hatch and toss 'em out on the surface with no space suits so they can feel the vacuum.
Oh, I guess they'd all be dead then. What a shame. However, "problem solved" !!!
Yes we did land on the moon but when the live brodcast went dead due to a "camera malfunction" ammeture radio opps who was tuned in to the conversation heard a conversation between Armsrong and control stating that he is being watched by huge UFO's and they looked menacing...check it out, NASA has and always has had to lie, also why is the flag waving like there is wind?...space is a vacume is it not?
Interesting theory, but as there was no camera malfunction, I'm curious as to where you got your info from? Considering the entire uplink from the lunar surface exists from the moment Armstrong deployed the camera (and Buzz turned it on) through to the point after which Armstrong returned inside the LM, I am curious as to when you think the "malfunction" happened?
SUre is almost half of america that believes we didn't go to the moon. So if those space suits are so tough against that radiation on the moon, then how come we don't use them to analyze an atomic bomb explosion after a year has passed? You know so that way we can study the effects up close?
are you seriously trying to say that you would want scientist to BLOW UP MORE atomic bombs??? just to study their effects using those stupid suits??? are you seriously implying that? as if oh blowing up nukes is ok with out ecosystems and cause no actual harm to anything in the planet???
That just paints a poor picture of the state of america's education/sanity.
And you present that as an argument?
Even your assumption that atomic bomb radiation is comparable to anything related to the moon landings is laughable. Do you think 'radiation' is some all encompassing term meaning 'lethal', or are you willing to accept that it comprises many different types, of varying energies, and therefore penetration and danger level?
Do you even know the difference between Alpha, Beta, Gamma, X-ray, Neutron and Cosmic radiation?
In an atomic bomb explosion, your biggest immediate radiation enemies are gamma, x-rays and neutrons, not to mention thermal radiation, depending on your distance from the epicenter. But do you have any idea of how intense this is in comparison? In space these particles aren't the problem anyway, and Alpha/Beta particles are easy to stop, but Cosmic rays are a problem long-term.
damn you just proved my point then because according to NASA no astronauts were affected by any 'rays' or radiation at all and they were out on the moon for about a day. Enough time to get exposed. Even some experts claim that the lead on those suits is not enough to protect them from the solar radiation.
I love your screen name it should be used for anybody that believes their government because this world is totally brainless.
Then you need to look harder. You'll find evidence of damage, it's just not as bad as you need to convince anyone that it was impossible. No surprises there.
Who's claiming space exploration isn't dangerous here? Not me, not even NASA. So what's your argument? NASA and the sane majority know it's dangerous, and that a certain amount of exposure was inevitable. What you need to understand is the nature of that exposure, and the damage expected.
You need to erase from your mind this stupid black and white mentality that 'any radiation is lethal, therefore they didn't go' because like just about anything else in science, it is quantative. I suggest you look up what damage has been documented amongst the astronauts instead of assuming the way you did. Sure, it's not serious, but if you're going to use it as an argument, then tell me where the fuck else they got it? Lemme guess, another conspiracy :P
FUnny. You see it is funny that NASA was nothing more than started as basically finding large objects in space and nothing in the beginning of any knowledge of human space flight. But it took them 10 years to go to the moon. When the constellation program started it now takes them longer than 10 years to figure out something. But with so many delays and costs the program was canceled.
I am skeptical to human space flight. - Rockerfeller
@scifisurfer Yes but befor they die, they'd probably think it must be some huge vacuum chamber with a fake moon environment and they're really still on earth.
Metallica rulez
lyrrad999 1 month ago
why is the flag moving if there's no air on the moon?
TheRunescapeBot2010 4 months ago
@TheRunescapeBot2010 You blind? It moves because the astronaut is pushing it into the ground, just as you'd stick a flag on a windless day on earth, you'd rotate the stick slightly one way and the other and push down.
TheRadiastral 2 months ago
Apollo 65 is better than the movie Apollo 18.
airforcemax 5 months ago
REAL! LOTFRAALSHICIMP
Dstevenb 6 months ago
FAKE! LOL
d0nk3yb0i 6 months ago
If I hear a single idiot who mentioning Kubrick or any conspiracy crap, I'll punch him in the face. Please enjoy this fabulous humankind achievement and leave the conspiracy bullshit to cheap, retard websites.
tristancalin 6 months ago 19
@tristancalin Kubrick was employed to make backup fake footage in case the mission failed... I think that's where a lot of people dismiss the conspiracy... maybe they did land, maybe they didn't... I think they did, but I also think, they had made backup fake footage in case of catastrophe, because the stakes against the Russians were way too high at the time, off the chart. And the American government (as shown by numereous broken Indian treaties) is in no way above playing dirty pool.
50caliberFistFK 4 months ago
at 2:00 to end the guy walking looks like ou can see through him? AM I SEEING THINGS?
leadiceman22 7 months ago
@wkwickham "they found nothing of real value"
They found knowledge about moving in space, which is priceless information.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@ccaptorchen "let a giant rubber ball fall and bounce on mars for a mile before stopping... if there was people on it they be all dead"
Actually NASA used 12 air bags designed to protect people in car crashes!
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@ParadiseOnLand Funny you should mention it, there are NO pictures of a gigantic, intricately-fabricated moon ball! Unless you mean the picture of the three astronauts with their helmets off in front of a 3m moon ball.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@ParadiseOnLand Well, you can hardly call it incompetence to send 26 astronauts to the Moon and back. And then HUNDREDS of astronauts to the space station.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen Oh Man. Xismist is lacking greatly in research skills. How does he explain the telecast logs independantly documented which show that only one telecast of the moonwalk happened in Australia, or that it was switched to the international feed (including Goldstone in California) once Parkes kicked in? Or that it occured at the time which was nowhere near "late at night"?Perhaps the coke- woman got confused into thinking the hot midday Australian sun was really the night sky moon?
Dstevenb 6 months ago
@Dstevenb Xismxist has only one idea: that the telecast was faked. This is proven by the appearance of a CocaCola-bottle which cannot exist on the Moon. So his idea is very shaky to begin with, especially as he claims that this bottle was somehow edited out, so we cannot look at it anymore.
BjornPalmen 6 months ago
How important for history is this video? And someone edited it. OK but why didnt he make correct speed? This slowmotion forgery is pathetic.
dleksi 8 months ago
@dleksi There is no slow motion, the sound track sounds perfectly normal. You did not think of that?
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
Amazing how they filmed this "one small step" in 1969 with the 1930's quality when in fact they already had the 1969's technology inside the capsel & LM.
xismxist 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xismxist "Amazing how they filmed this "one small step" in 1969 with the 1930's quality when in fact they already had the 1969's technology inside the capsel & LM".
Beaming LIVE TV from the moon to the earth is "1930s quality"?
Of course, the colour film they brought back gives a much better picture. It's disadvantage over a TV link was that they had to bring it back with them before anyone could watch it!
eventcone 8 months ago
@xismxist You are mistaken. The one small step for a man - one giant leap for mankind was NOT filmed. It was on TV and beamed all over the planet!
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen it was FILMED, because the astronots "went out from the lm" many, many hours earlier than NASAS announced time, but all tv stations only knew the announced time so they recorded the "first step" in their tracking stations in Australia and LATER send it out to the rest of the world, only Australia got to see the LIVE footage by mistake and there we could see the coke bottle, which was ofcourse edited out later.
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist "all tv stations only knew the announced time so they..."
You must think that "all tv stations" were stupid indeed. We were all waiting for Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin to come out.
The Australian lady who saw the "coke bottle" also said that she had to stay up late. Actually the landing occurred at day time in Australia. So she is lying.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen While the rest of the world was waiting, Australia had already seen it live by mistake and this was very late/early morning. Later when the recorded edited public version came out it was indeed day in Australia... she is telling the truth. YOU on the other hand together with Windley, Plait and the rest of the propagandNUTS are proven liars
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist OK so she saw the Coke LATER. You say yourself that it was "later when the recorded edited public version came". Obviously there was a Coca-Cola commercial inserted. That broadcast did not come from the Moon, even though the lady stayed up all night to see it.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen OMFG are u slow your SOB?! i will repeat u idiot: she stayed up late/early to see the LIVE footage (COKE included) but later in the public version that was send to the rest of the world (u know what that means?) the coke was edited out. How many more times need i repeat this ur FUCKING SLOW DICKHEAD?
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist The live footage was in the afternoon. She said it was late at night. That was not accurate.
And it beats me why anyone would edit in or out a Coke bottle? She was the only one in all Australia who says she saw a bottle. There was a Coca-Cola commercial on at the other channel.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen IT WASNT! edited version was in the afternoon! do the time differences right and you will see that the LIVE footage was either very late or very early australian time. Some of her friends saw the bottle as well, and it was in the newspapers too
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist I stand by my observation that the first Moon walk occurred in the early afternoon, Australian time.
It is very unclear who you think was editing something when there was a live feed from the Moon going on.
Now you bring in "some of her friends". What friends? Names please!
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
Comment removed
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@xismxist This is what the Honeysuckle Creek astronomers reported:
"At 1112 AEST the Moon rose above the gum-tree clad mountains to the east beside Deadman’s Hill and the receivers promptly locked onto a strong signal from the lunar surface. On the Moon Armstrong and Aldrin were slowly hurrying into their EVA suits in the cramped space of the LM’s cabin. At 1139 AEST, 27 minutes after we had acquired the LM’s signal, Aldrin reached for the handle to open the hatch.">>>
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@xismxist >>> "At Honeysuckle, television technician Ed von Renouard heard Aldrin say the circuit breaker was in and suddenly, at 1254 AEST, an image appeared. Houston TV: “Roger, thank you. All stations, we have just switched video to Honeysuckle.”
At 2156:20 USCDT, July 20 (1256:20 AEST July 21 1969) 38 year old Neil Alden Armstrong from Wapakoneta, Ohio, USA, stepped onto the lunar surface and spoke those immortal words:
“That’s one small step for a man…. one giant leap for mankind.”
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
Comment removed
xismxist 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen WRONG. 21:56 was when the TAPED version was shown to rest of the world, that was the recorded television time and nothing else. The LIVE event took place many, many hours earlier and equal with late night / early morning in Australia. Neil and Buzz stated themself that they went out from the lander several hours before the announced time (NASA did recomend some sleep first but they ignored it) so they had to record the "first step" and later show it at the announced time.
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist 21:56 USCDT is 12:56 AEST and Neil Armstrong is coming out of the LM.
There was no LIVE event "many, many hours earlier". You are just incorrect. This is the LIVE event.
Honeysuckle Creek is lucky because the moon had just risen. I TOLD YOU ALL THIS ALREADY.
The lady COULD NOT have seen the live broadcast at "late night / early morning" because it was on at 12:56 AEST which is early afternoon. Your witness is lying. Sorry.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@xismxist 1. There is no doubt that the signal comes from the moon, Honeysuckle has to wait for moonrise!
2. There are no video editing equipment in the Lunar Module. Therefore the broadcast is live.
3. The time can be verified as 12.56 AEST in the Apollo 11 log.
4, There goes your late night / early morning coke bottle theory.
5. There is no coke bottles on the moon. There is no mention in the inventory of "24 bottles of coke".
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen If a were you i wouldnt get that excited about NASA LOGS, especially after seing "the little gem" - logs dont match the claimed footage and vice versa, video cutting constantly etc, and so even with this case. I dont buy anything in these bullshitlogs because NASA like you and your propagandafriends, is proven liars
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist You always change the subject when you are losing the discussion?
That confused lady said she saw a coke bottle on the moon, which nobody else has seen.
Then she said she had to stay up late to see the astronauts, when in fact the first moon walk was in daytime.
I checked the time when the moon walk started, it was 12:56 in eastern Australia.
The signal was received after moonrise in Sydney, it was not recorded, it came live from the Moon.
The facts are clear: the lady was mistaken.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen If the "moon walk" (studio walk) really took place 12:56 aus time / 21:56 us time then the television broadcasts must had take place several hours later, which would been early morning in the USA (because it wasnt LIVE) but that was never the case. Try to understand that what they saw on televsion was TAPED. The facsts are clear: the old woman was right all the time because 12:56 in Australia was when the taped version was shown, but she saw the LIVE footage several hours earlier...
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist
It happened 12.56 local time in eastern oz. Signal received from the moon at both Parks radio telescope and Tidbinbilla deep space tracking station.
Both these facilities were manned mostly by Australian post grad students. Are you suggesting they were all in on a hoax? With so much bitterness going on over Vietnam how many of those young intelligent people do you think would have lied over such a thing?
TheSpiritof1969 7 months ago
@TheSpiritof1969 OMFG are you even for real?! Need i even mention that both these facilities is owned by NASA? so faking it was the easiest part, how can you believe in something who lacks any kind of independend verification?
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist
Parks sponsored by British. Tidbin only partly owned. Both 100% staffed by Australian post graduates. That is a fact, do you homework.
TheSpiritof1969 7 months ago
1. We KNOW the broadcast came directly from the Moon, because Honeysuckle Creek had to wait for moonrise in Eastern Australia.
2. We KNOW the exact time because it is on the Apollo 11 log.
3. There could not have been any broadcast "several hours earlier". You are just PLAIN WRONG.
4. Also you have not shown why ANYBODY would like to TAPE a coke bottle...
5. The woman is totally mistaken and she even had the time wrong.
Your idiotic comment "because it wasnt live" really takes the cake.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen 1. Signals from moon doesnt prove it was astronots on the moon.
2. NASA did already proven themself to be liars when it comes to logs (see little gem)
3. The claimed "first step" cant possible been showed live the time you claim, because it was RECORDED.
4. Because that was the REAL LIVE broadcast... the bottle was edited out in the next broadcast (the official live footage)
5. The woman was 100% right
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist
You must be really desperate by now: 1. signals from Moon are not from Moon.... :))))))
2. You are as always completely wrong: space exploration is exact work.
3, I claim nothing, I am telling you: the world's first moon walk started 12:56.
4, Your best evidence is a "bottle" which was edited out. Oh yea... :))))))
5. Yes if late night is = noon the woman is right, but that never happens... :)))))
If you continue you will only make yourself completely ridiculous.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen Watch the little gem before i can go any further with you! it proves that the logs doesnt match the video, i bet you havent seen it yet? Soviets lunochods was sending pics to Jodrell Bank, does that prove it was kosmonauts on the moon too?! tell me who the first russian on the moon was!!!!!!! fucking IDIOT, you cant even accept the fact that the "FIRST STEP" WASNT LIVE BUT RECORDED
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist What gem??
"Soviets lunochods was sending pics to Jodrell Bank, does that prove it was kosmonauts on the moon too?"
The lunachods did not talk to each other and to Baikonur. That would have proved it.
I really do not think that it would have been possible to postpone the first steps on the Moon and only send out a recording later. The Australians would never have been silent about that. And we KNOW the first steps were broadcasted from the Moon without any delay. Give it up!
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen Keep your eyes open! the video was so devastating so it was removed from utub and Jarrahs first account suspended (for what?! NASA is public domain) "The Australians would never have been silent about that" - no they didnt! where have u been?! already forgot the coke bottle?! There has never EVER been any kind of independent verifications when it comes to the "moon landing" so postpone the first steps was easier than u even can imagine
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist "never EVER been any kind of independent verifications"
You are very unlucky with your statements! The crew at Honeysuckle Creek Observatory were Australian students. And they had to wait for moonrise, a completely independent verification that this was a broadcast FROM THE MOON.
So you are wrong. Again.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen HAHA your FUCKING LIAR! WIll it never end for you?! the crew was about 100 and of these 100 it was only a HANDFUL of australians... (need i even mention that the others were from USA?) WOW so much for your independend verifications caims! you can hear it yourself from 24s in this clip watch?v=kkmNxCgPRtk&feature=related
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist Don't you see that you only need ONE student to say that the whole ting was faked?
But NOT ONE of the HANDFUL INDEPENDENT AUSTRALIAN STUDENTS ever said that.
So I stand by my claim that this was a broadcast from the Moon.
Do you stand by your claim that everybody is lying? (Including you, I may add.)
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BjornPalmen I said: The crew at Honeysuckle Creek Observatory were Australian students. And they had to wait for moonrise, a completely independent verification that this was a broadcast FROM THE MOON.
YOU SAID: the crew was about 100 and of these 100 it was only a HANDFUL of australians
The truth is of course that almost everybody was Australian. Only a handful were not.
So you are a liar now. No doubt about it.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@xismxist "of these 100 it was only a HANDFUL of australians"
You did not listen to the man, he said "ALL BUT A HANDFUL WERE AUSTRALIANS".
That means that practically everybody was from Australia, only a handful were not Australians.
So you committed a painful harakiri on this one. :)))
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@xismxist "already forgot the coke bottle?" YES! And you should too. There never was a coke bottle at midnight in Eastern Australia, live or recorded. It was a very clumsy lie. I cannot see why you fell for it. All the footage is still available on YouTube. THERE IS NO COKE BOTTLE, not even a Sprite.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen YOU and NASA are the liars, watch?v=C4U1kJzzklo says alot
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist Yes that video really said a lot. The woman that sees coke bottles on the Moon has now moved from Eastern to Western Australia and a small moon rock is now a glass bottle. No reflections of light from the glass are seen, however. The bottle is then changed into an army issue drinking flask.
If THIS is you basis for calling me a liar, how about your witness, who now, relocated to Western Australia(!), still "has to stay up late" to catch a broadcast at 1 p.m. in the afternoon. BS!
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen Canged?! its TWO(2) bottles on the fake lunar set, you cant even understand what they says even when its a pic to the sound... i feel sorry for you
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist The bottles seem to be multiplying faster than the Australian ladies who watch daytime TV at midnight.
Bottles are made of glass which reflects light. Moon rocks are made of rocks that do not reflect light.
Give it up.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen A old woman, probarly in the last years in her life - is a liar according to you
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist Exactly why do you think that this was an old woman? After all, she stayed up all night to see a broadcast which was on at noon, 12:56 AEST. Old women do not do that and old women generally tell the truth and do not make up stories about coke bottles and nightly broadcasts.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen It was two broadcasts in Australia (one live, other one recorded & edited) what part of that dont you understand? if 12:56 was the first one, then the second must been on the evening several hours later which doesnt add upp. NASA(and you) is the liars here so i wouldnt trust a word they says, especially with their proven history background of editing logs and videos
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist "NASA(and you) is the liars here so i wouldnt trust a word they says"
But you trust somebody who says she saw Armstrong's moonwalk at midnight?
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@xismxist "(one live, other one recorded & edited) what part of that dont you understand?"
I cannot understand how the recorded & edited (non-existing!) version could be shown hours before the original live broadcast?
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen If it wasnt 2 broadcasts then how could the first version contain the bottle while the second version dident? according to NASA, Neil & buzz went out way before shedule but the TV stations(expect some few ones in Australia) was never noticed, THATS WHY they needed to RECORD the "first step" how many times must u have this PROVEN FACT repeated?
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist The first moonwalk was a live broadcast from the Moon. There was only one version. No bottle was seen. The lady is mistaken about the "bottle". There is a lens flare moving rapidly over the screen. It could possibly be mistaken for a bottle (but one cannot tell if it is Coke Regular or Coke Light). The lady was dreaming the whole thing, maybe thats why she thinks it was on at night. It wasn't, The moonwalk started at 12:56 afternoon.
So far as I know nobody recorded anything.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen Nope! go ahead and prove it then (wait, u cant even prove man has walk on the moon) answer, if it wasnt 2 broadcoasts then ENTIRE world was watching the "first step" LIVE which wasnt the case, it was RECORDED u dumbshit! AUSTRALIA SAW IT FIRST, thats a proven fact!
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist It is proved when Neil Armstron came on, that was live from12:56 AEST.
Nothing was recorded and Australia sent the signal live to Houston.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@xismxist You say "they needed to RECORD the 'first step"'.
Well they didn't really need to record anything and anyway there was no videorecorder on the Eagle or on the Columbia.
So you are totally disproved on this technicality.
BjornPalmen 5 months ago
@BjornPalmen they did, u fucking dipshit idiot! your nothing else than a proven liar. Ni video recorder? what about the fact that they used the "16-millimeter Data Acquisition Camera" to record the separation at the dark side on the moon, IDIOT
xismxist 5 months ago
@xismxist The 16-millimeter Data Acquisition Camera was not a videorecorder. It worked with film, 16-millimeter film, which had to be developed in Houston.
BjornPalmen 5 months ago
@BjornPalmen well, u got my point!!! they needed to come home with it. FILM recorder or VIDEO recorder omfg ur pathetic... out of words?!
xismxist 5 months ago
FILM recorder or VIDEO recorder
A video recorder has the button PLAY. No such button on a 16 mm camera, The camera cannot play back undeveloped film. And it did not. And as there was no video recorder there could not be anything RECORDED.
So what you suggest is impossible. There was no way to play back 16 mm film.
BjornPalmen 5 months ago
@BjornPalmen you still dont understand! if they couldnt record it, then how could we see the material first when they "came back" to earth? but guess what, your right about one part... they didnt need to record it, because we saw the RECORDED separation(!) (at the dark side of the moon...) in LIVE tv(!).... yeah they really screwed it up /watch?v=kYd1d7a12eI
xismxist 5 months ago
@xismxist I want to return to your biggest blooper! You actually said:
(here it comes!)
"1. Signals from the moon do not prove that there were astronauts on the moon."
So you assume that the equipment, Apollo Lunar Experiments etc. could just be talking among themselves?
I think this final show of stupidity (and ill will) calls for an apology.
And how could you say something so stupid!?
Here it is again:
"1. Signals from the moon do not prove that there were astronauts on the moon."
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen Lunochods also send signals from the moon (because they were there, moron) so according to you, it has been kosmonauts on the moon! can you tell me WHO and WHEN? no excuses
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist "logs dont match the claimed footage" The whole idea with a log is that the log records what is going on. What do you mean by video cutting constantly?? Video cutting ON THE MOON? On the moon??
Constantly??? This is not accurate at all. You can see in the interior shots from the Lunar Module that there is no "video cutting" equipment whatsoever in the LM. Completely inaccurate, a fantasy,
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen How can they have an UNinterrupted log with a CUTTED footage? camera cuts several times in "the little gem" - its original NASA footage and everytime they gonna film the earth and then back to interior, it cuts or/and totaly blacks out... but logs arent interrupted at all. You cant have both!!
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist You say: "LIVE footage was either very late or very early Australian time." The truth is 1256:20 AEST July 21 1969. AEST = Australian Eastern Standard Time. Noon! You are so unlucky with your wild guesses!
And you inconvenienced all these ladies, making them watch that coke bottle either very late or very early Australian time. :D
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen OMFG how can someone possible be this slow like you are?! "1256:20 AEST July 21 1969" is the RECORDED public version that the rest of the world saw! the "first step" took place many hours earlier which ONLY Australia saw LIVE! how many times must i repeat that?
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist I told you this was what the Honeysuckle Creek astronomers reported:
"At 1112 AEST the Moon rose above the gum-tree clad mountains to the east beside Deadman’s Hill and the receivers promptly locked onto a strong signal,"
THIS WAS THE SIGNAL FROM THE MOON, n o t from any recording studio.
12:56 is when Neil Armstrong is outside. There is no room for your insane "many hours earlier".
You do not have to repeat your weird ideas, obviously you have no clue to what happened.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xismxist There was no bottle in the original broadcast, the lady was just making things up.
"6:00 p.m.- With everything in order, Armstrong radios a recommendation that they plan to start the EVA (Extra Vehicular Activity), earlier than originally scheduled, at about 9:00 p.m. EDT."
9:00 p.m. EDT is 12 am Australian time.
Your witness is gravely mistaken and so are her imaginary friends.
BjornPalmen 1 week ago
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xismxist "in fact they already had the 1969's technology inside the capsel & LM" yes but not the bandwidth needed to transmit color tv from the LM. That is because the LM had only a small antenna.
BjornPalmen 6 months ago
I suppose certain people will want to go back to 'fix' the mistake on the plaque. They know that because of evolution, the lesser evolved people put A.D. on the plaque.
reram000 9 months ago
Great example of the communications delay at 1:41. Everything is recorded on earth. Note the pause after "...that doesn't have TV coverage of the scene." Then, you here the word, "scene" picked up by Collins' mic. Approximately 2.5 seconds.
Then, note that when Collins asks about the quality of the TV, the answer is immediate (since it was recorded on earth). Just as it should be.
LunarTuner 11 months ago
I remember when it happened.
Yes, we did in fact land on the moon.
George Vreeland Hill
GeorgeVreelandHill 11 months ago
@sodomized78
You're a fool. May be you think you are smarter than all those scientists that agree the Moonlanding was real.
Rob260259 1 year ago
Sir Rupert Goggleplop Smithe, was a british, first men on the moon in 1964!
heliwithH 1 year ago
The video shows the flag moving like a flag furled,is it possible ? does the atmosphere at the moon allows that ? and mud kicked up,?How ?
I want an answer ? whom to ask ?
do i get the answer here ?
ziaullah123456 1 year ago
@ziaullah123456 it only waves when they are holding it. There is no atmosphere on the moon, so as soon as they stopped touching it in any way, it stopped moving.
Moon dust was kicked up the same way it would be on earth.
BlackRaptor31 1 year ago
@BlackRaptor31 Another proven LIAR... no the flag does not only waving when they holding it, but in fact it waves when they run past it "apollo 15 waving flag"
xismxist 9 months ago
@xismxist Dave Scott goes past the flag and his left arm brushes against the flag, which moves one inch or so.
It is certainly not "waving". Where do you get all your BS information?
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen its several FEETS to the flag! if Scott touching it with his hand then he will have the worlds longest arms LOL
xismxist 7 months ago
@xismxist "its several FEET to the flag" The LOL is on you this time. There is clearly not several feet between Scott and the flag.
One minute earlier Irwin is seen backing away from the flag at the same spot.
And yes, Scotty had big arms. He was in a bulky space suit.
Again, where do you get all your BS info?
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
MIKE COLLINS : "hows the quality of the TV"
BRUCE MCCANDLIS: " It sucks....but in 50 years they'll clean it up with digital video equipment".
ARMSTRONG: "By then well have a city on the moon"
dcb1138 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I find it odd that NASA can release this footage. The original Apollo 11 footage was reported missing (it was all the buzz in the news at one time). Maybe they dug this out of Disney Studio archival storage where they faked this in the first place.
MichaelFrostChicago 1 year ago
Comment removed
MichaelFrostChicago 1 year ago
Fake as your dumb believers wives orgasm's ...unless I'm fucking them. And I am fucking some of them....hahahahahahahahaha
realdrummer110 1 year ago
God bless NASA!
Masihraddi 1 year ago
Just out of curiosity... How come it appears that the astronaut is transparent? Anyone know?
zenmeister451 1 year ago
@zenmeister451 : Because when you go down to the moon, you have to leave your body in orbit and land in "spirit form". Don't you know anything ?
dcb1138 1 year ago
@dcb1138
OH! I didn't know that. Well, the old saying still goes, eh? Ya learns sumthun ever day.
zenmeister451 1 year ago
@zenmeister451 Probably just interleaving.
Marth8880 8 months ago
@zenmeister451 The vidicon tube retains the bright light from the lander's leg. So you can see it "through" the astronauts.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
There's no such thing as space! Stars are attached to a glass-like cover. There's nothing on the outside of the glass cover you fools!
killugh 1 year ago
@killugh lol
gantonk 1 year ago
HUBBLE HAS TAKEN PHOTOS OF THE LANDING SIGHT IDIOTS. ITS REAL
SulcZp 1 year ago
@SulcZp
But the best (and more evident) images were provided by Chandrayaan-1 and the LRO spacecraft. :)
WeAreTheRobots 1 year ago
@SulcZp Such a lie ...Hubble is nothing but a front for an earth based CGI program...
realdrummer110 1 year ago
@realdrummer110 This comment has to be a joke no one is that lost.
78BlueCamaroZ28 1 year ago
@SulcZp yeh taken pictures of earth
shanershaner1 1 year ago
@SulcZp Hubble has never taken photos of the landing sites. Learn how a telescope works before making these claims.
78BlueCamaroZ28 1 year ago
@78BlueCamaroZ28 Hubble has never taken a picture of outer space!!! All cgi used before images. Check old sci fi book covers and compare to so called new images of "distant galaxies" from Nasa. LOL. Hubble is used by the DEPT of Defense to look at trouble makers from space. Period!!!!
realdrummer110 1 year ago
@realdrummer110 Oh my, man you are one big joker. You are pulling my leg for sure now.
78BlueCamaroZ28 1 year ago
@realdrummer110 Oh really? Then how do you explain Hubble deep-field?
Marth8880 8 months ago
Mankind really has to go back to the moon to inspire a new generation of people.If we spent a fraction of what we do on 'defence' it would be more than possible and easily justifiable when compared to the tragedies of modern day warfare.The risk of failure is not as great as 5oyrs ago. A united effort is the way forward.
Keep the dream alive.Aim for the stars.
worldwidedownload 1 year ago
It's fun reading how stupid I am for not believing Apollo went to the moon. Once the truth has been unmasked, all the psychological auto-hypnosis of my opponents are revealed. I love it- that feeling of superiority and power. If you could only realize the ease by which you are being led. The world wants to be deceived. A truth-seeker is by definition in a tiny minority. Peace
hozayamz 1 year ago
@hozayamz This is what psychology wrongly applied makes you come up with. You are anything but a truthseeker. You are completely wrong of course, all those people went to the moon. You think 12 highly trained test pilots all would lie? Who suffers from psychological autohypnosis now?
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I remember this day very vividly, July 20, 1969, because it is then that I came to the beautiful United States of America for the first time!!! The whole world was glued to the tubes watching Apollo 11 land on the moon! Long live USA!!!
extravirginclean 1 year ago
nice video, i like how the astronauts are invisable. It just shows that two films were laid one on top of another. a still picture of fake moon horizon and a live action astronaut shot of astronaut moving in slow motion. lol
nitojo7 1 year ago
Why would they need to fake footage of the Earth if we even got close to the Moon?
Some of you may find this short documentary useful -
A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon Part 1
May Jesus bless you and help you to see and understand the lies that are all around you. x
EpicMoan 1 year ago
@EpicMoan "help you to see and understand the lies that are all around you"
There are no lies in this case, Apollo 11 really went to the moon.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
Hey Phil-
Why did you mark my post on your channel page as spam? Don't you want people to see summaries of hoax evidence? If a theory is wrong, it'll fall by its own lack of merit. Censorship is only necessary when a theory has merit.
FatFreddy88 2 years ago
By the way the hoax evidence is not true. All for it can be disproven.
SuperKings18 1 year ago
The moon missions were faked.
"There's a partial summary of hoax evidence posted on a science forum. To see it, google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon". The summary is on page 15. It's the seventh post from the top."
FatFreddy88 2 years ago
@FatFreddy88 The moon missions were real.
There's a full summary of third-party independent evidence posted on wikipedia. To see it, go to wikipedia and enter 'Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings' The links to all stated evidence exist at the bottom of the page.
Would you care to refute any of these facts?
krisdevalle 2 years ago
My FatFreddy account is blocked here.
"Would you care to refute any of these facts?"
There's nothing there that doesn't have an alternative explanation and nothing there makes the hoax evidence go away (Do a YouTube search on "Apollo 15 flag waving").
3W's (dot) sourcewatch (dot) org/index (dot) php?title=Moon_Hoax
(check link for gaps)
Cosmored3 2 years ago
Hey Phil-
What's the idea of blocking my FatFreddy88 account?
The evidence presented on this page -"Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings' has all been discussed before. Reflectors on the moon could have been placed by robot craft, pictures of stars taken from the moon could have been taken by robot craft or from an unmanned probe in orbit.
I intend to keep posting here. If I disappear, it's because Phil Plait blocked this account.
Cosmored3 2 years ago
Well if they were capable of sending quite advanced robots, then the only real obstacle is the Van Allen Belts, which the ISS passes through regularly without any harm.
What obstacles do you propose stopped them from going to the moon? It seems to be an established fact amongst the scientific community that short trips in cislunar space carry only a low risk from radiation.
krisdevalle 2 years ago 2
@krisdevalle
"which the ISS passes through regularly without any harm."
It's possible that there is a section of the SS that's well shielded where they can take refuge when they go through that section of the Van Allen belts.
It looks like I'm unblocked now. Thanks for unblocking me.
FatFreddy88 2 years ago
@FatFreddy88 It's also possible that it doesn't, and short-term exposure is very low-risk.
Some of the EVAs last 6-7 hours, and astronauts do not take shelter during them.
I'm not seeing too many obstacles to lunar travel according to this kind of clear evidence.
krisdevalle 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Some of the EVAs last 6-7 hours, and astronauts do not take shelter during them."
There are plausible scenarios that would explain this. Do they pass through that section once on every orbit? Maybe we are told that the EVA's last 6-7 hours but it's not true.
FatFreddy88 2 years ago
Your reasoning is pretty flawed! The EVA's offer zero evidence! All spacecraft and astronauts in low earth orbit are shielded by the earths own protection mechanism, it's electro-magnetic field! So any low earth orbit objects are naturally shielded by this field which protects earth from high levels of dangerous radiation!
grantporter2008 1 year ago
The ISS passes through the South Atlantic Anomaly, a low part of the Van Allen Belts, for about 15% of their daily orbits.
krisdevalle 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"It seems to be an established fact amongst the scientific community that...risk from radiation."
Go to this post and read the part about radiation-
"There's a partial summary of hoax evidence posted on a science forum. To see it, google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon". The summary is on page 15. It's the seventh post from the top."
Then read my first post on page 16.
FatFreddy88 2 years ago
Because you don't have all your facts straight and Phil knows it! Yes they did REALLY go to the moon and YES, some of the apollo footage is fake! It has been faked to hide evidence of what they reeeeally found when they got to the moon. Ancient structures were being blacked out or just simply airbrushed out of images. They are also lying about mars, phobos and saturns moon Iapetus which appears to be convincingly artificial. NASA is just a PR front for the real militarised space program.
grantporter2008 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yes they did REALLY go to the moon and YES, some of the apollo footage is fake! It has been faked to hide evidence of what they reeeeally found when they got to the moon. Ancient structures were being blacked out or just simply airbrushed out of images. They are also lying about mars, phobos and saturns moon Iapetus which appears to be convincingly artificial. NASA is just a PR front for the real militarised space program.
grantporter2008 1 year ago
if it wasnt for landing on the moon the space shuttle would not of been created. or is that fake too? asshole you must be an obama supporter
BeantownJim 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"if it wasnt for landing on the moon the space shuttle would not of been created. or is that fake too? asshole you must be an obama supporter"
No. I'm a Nader supporter. Have you watched those videos about the Bilderberg group?
FatFreddy88 2 years ago
@BeantownJim - the density of your skull is enough to create a black hole.
therm0911 1 year ago
@therm0911, you are stupid liberastic moron. One rat of a pak..
amper0003 1 year ago
Space shuttle is a flying death trap. It needed to scrapped decades ago, they got anti gravity propulsion working like a charm! NASA is just a PR front for the real space program!
grantporter2008 1 year ago
Yes they did REALLY go to the moon and YES, some of the apollo footage is fake! It has been faked to hide evidence of what they reeeeally found when they got to the moon. Ancient structures were being blacked out or just simply airbrushed out of images. They are also lying about mars, phobos and saturns moon Iapetus which appears to be convincingly artificial. NASA is just a PR front for the real militarised space program.
grantporter2008 1 year ago
Wow Grant you went from ignorant to crazy in record time.
So, how do YOU know that there's structures on the moon? Did you go there in a dream once?
krisdevalle 1 year ago 17
@FatFreddy88 You are young and very stupid.
extravirginclean 1 year ago
@ b4gm4n
Nope not true. A media pool was organized at Houston and the feed was sent out to all stations via the pool. The pool arrangement was devised WITH the networks together. In Australia and NZ the feed was taken direct from Sydney video - NOT from Houston.
Dstevenb 2 years ago
Is it true that American TV networks of the time who wanted to record this moment via a direct link were refused by NASA and asked to just film the screen at mission control?
b4gm4n 2 years ago
@b4gm4n "asked to just film the screen"
I think that is basically correct. The tv-signal was not standard but part of the telemetry from the LM.
This was to conserve bandwidth, the distance was 380 000 km.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
watch?v=iZ3wh2cjekE
"Moon Rising"
777equals666 2 years ago
We did land BUT 2 years earlier!!!
Armstrong was the 13th man on the mon
nodws 2 years ago
Sorry, but could you elaborate on that theory?
TheGreatSparky 2 years ago
Some tape dropouts at the beginning but defiinitely improved quality overall. Less noise and grain in the video than other versions I have seen.
chrisw71 2 years ago
Here's an original idea: Gather up up all the idiots who don't believe we landed on the moon. Put them on a spacecraft and land them on the moon. They won't believe it, of course, so then open the hatch and toss 'em out on the surface with no space suits so they can feel the vacuum.
Oh, I guess they'd all be dead then. What a shame. However, "problem solved" !!!
scifisurfer 2 years ago 37
Yes we did land on the moon but when the live brodcast went dead due to a "camera malfunction" ammeture radio opps who was tuned in to the conversation heard a conversation between Armsrong and control stating that he is being watched by huge UFO's and they looked menacing...check it out, NASA has and always has had to lie, also why is the flag waving like there is wind?...space is a vacume is it not?
Striker1973666 2 years ago
Interesting theory, but as there was no camera malfunction, I'm curious as to where you got your info from? Considering the entire uplink from the lunar surface exists from the moment Armstrong deployed the camera (and Buzz turned it on) through to the point after which Armstrong returned inside the LM, I am curious as to when you think the "malfunction" happened?
Dstevenb 2 years ago
nasa does not have the technology to put men on the moon
polskich 2 years ago
Well you you needs rockets to do that, and as we all know NASA doesnt have any of those.
Dstevenb 2 years ago
@scifisurfer
Agreed ;)
Shall I design the space plane to take them there? And shall I make it stealth? Stealth is always cool :D
triplepogi2009 1 year ago
@scifisurfer
SUre is almost half of america that believes we didn't go to the moon. So if those space suits are so tough against that radiation on the moon, then how come we don't use them to analyze an atomic bomb explosion after a year has passed? You know so that way we can study the effects up close?
dragnet53 1 year ago
are you seriously trying to say that you would want scientist to BLOW UP MORE atomic bombs??? just to study their effects using those stupid suits??? are you seriously implying that? as if oh blowing up nukes is ok with out ecosystems and cause no actual harm to anything in the planet???
mmmodafoca 1 year ago
@dragnet53
That just paints a poor picture of the state of america's education/sanity.
And you present that as an argument?
Even your assumption that atomic bomb radiation is comparable to anything related to the moon landings is laughable. Do you think 'radiation' is some all encompassing term meaning 'lethal', or are you willing to accept that it comprises many different types, of varying energies, and therefore penetration and danger level?
For fuck's sake do some research!
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@dragnet53
Do you even know the difference between Alpha, Beta, Gamma, X-ray, Neutron and Cosmic radiation?
In an atomic bomb explosion, your biggest immediate radiation enemies are gamma, x-rays and neutrons, not to mention thermal radiation, depending on your distance from the epicenter. But do you have any idea of how intense this is in comparison? In space these particles aren't the problem anyway, and Alpha/Beta particles are easy to stop, but Cosmic rays are a problem long-term.
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@MoronAntidote
damn you just proved my point then because according to NASA no astronauts were affected by any 'rays' or radiation at all and they were out on the moon for about a day. Enough time to get exposed. Even some experts claim that the lead on those suits is not enough to protect them from the solar radiation.
I love your screen name it should be used for anybody that believes their government because this world is totally brainless.
dragnet53 1 year ago
@dragnet53
Then you need to look harder. You'll find evidence of damage, it's just not as bad as you need to convince anyone that it was impossible. No surprises there.
Who's claiming space exploration isn't dangerous here? Not me, not even NASA. So what's your argument? NASA and the sane majority know it's dangerous, and that a certain amount of exposure was inevitable. What you need to understand is the nature of that exposure, and the damage expected.
Pointless post tbh.
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@dragnet53
You need to erase from your mind this stupid black and white mentality that 'any radiation is lethal, therefore they didn't go' because like just about anything else in science, it is quantative. I suggest you look up what damage has been documented amongst the astronauts instead of assuming the way you did. Sure, it's not serious, but if you're going to use it as an argument, then tell me where the fuck else they got it? Lemme guess, another conspiracy :P
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@dragnet53
BTW who said there was lead in those suits?
Where did you get that from?
And what kind of solar radiation was that supposed to protect them from?
Do you know anything about solar radiation?
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@scifisurfer
FUnny. You see it is funny that NASA was nothing more than started as basically finding large objects in space and nothing in the beginning of any knowledge of human space flight. But it took them 10 years to go to the moon. When the constellation program started it now takes them longer than 10 years to figure out something. But with so many delays and costs the program was canceled.
I am skeptical to human space flight. - Rockerfeller
dragnet53 1 year ago
@dragnet53
Fine - go ask Obama about funding and he'll tell you.
Funny how you claim conspiracy when funding was available, yet it's still a conspiracy when it isn't.
Think on that.
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@scifisurfer
Seconded!
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@scifisurfer Yes but befor they die, they'd probably think it must be some huge vacuum chamber with a fake moon environment and they're really still on earth.
Oops, did I offend anyone?
VonDenHottentotten 1 year ago
@scifisurfer so im waiting when u will do it. but you cant, thats the sad true.
spinoza1234567890 1 year ago
@scifisurfer You want me to die cuz i wont believe in the same thing you do?
darkmasterpel 11 months ago