Atlas V JUNO Launch Highlights

[Ondelendo]

I am very happy to see the vidoe A United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket blasts off carrying NASA's Juno mission from you, hopefully the others also are happy for You

[bebeheuy]

I Love The Video Atlas V JUNO Launch Highlights It Can Increase My Knowledge

[willamricard]

Nice Video Atlas V JUNO Launch Highlights That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You

[imegatrone]

I Really Like The Video A United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket blasts off carrying NASA's Juno mission From Your

[bundawartini]

Your Video A United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket blasts off carrying NASA's Juno mission Is Very Useful Sharing

[quinxxer]

at 2:22 , there she goes. on her way to explore where no other has been.

[MamoDad]

Too much music. Reality is enough, there's no need to sex it up like the crap you see on TV.

MTV has ruined everything!

[kokocipher]

@MamoDad lol, seriously, the music is such a turn off.

[ti994apc]

@ProDrummerKid Potty mouth.  Thats all that needs to be said.

[ProDrummerKid]

@ti994apc Oh. Shorry. I think this is a big leap in human technology and is truly, truly amazing. Better? :D

[ti994apc]

Now that AtlasV decided to play Russian roulette with the addition of Solid rocket boosters, its only a matter of time until....... BOOOOOOM, Obviously a major Malfunction, we are looking carefully at the situation.."

[profesorsergio]

Amazing!!!. In Juno works my dearest friend NASA HQ Dr. Adriana Ocampo.

[dagwoodsystems]

Most "space shot" videos are way, way, waaaaay too long and peppered with that stupid oily and overly-sentimental NASA chatter. Ordinary people sometimes watch said videos because they know that--while not entirely understanding what's going on--nonetheless feel "this is important...I should watch". This video has all the things that have been lacking. It rocks, it's sexy and the cuts underscore the spirit. Fantastic job. Thank you so much! --Tim

[HelenWheeels]

Excellent video! The launch highlights were very well edited and it fit the music (or vice versa) quite nicely.  Good job!

[MrJarth]

- An so, man once again launched a massive dildo into space -

[Kg277]

Stupid music and countdown edited..

[2902hawthorne]

Hurrah NASA. Hurrah planetary sciences. Happy to have seen this bird launch. Thanks, ULA.

[johnmmeyer]

The video is excellent, Thanks!

I'd really love to know more about the music, too! The bit at the beginning reminded me of "Firefly" and the rest rocked!

[SpiritQueen]

Wicked as...would love to know who created the background music matches really well with the vid

[gaetanomarano]

-

so, if Boeing will respect the expected (low) costs, specs and launch schedule, the (reusable) CST-100 could be the ONLY commercial crew-vehicle really used by NASA as Soyuz/Shuttle replacement and the "KILLER" of the Dreamchaser, Dragon and Blue Kliper, in (both) the government funded and space-tourists markets

-

[stardolphin2]

@gaetanomarano Why? Because of all the CCDdev vehicles, CST-100 most nearly resembles something you once 'thought of first?' Or because it's being developed by a company everyone's already heard of, and not 'garage amateur hobbyists?'

(Not that I have anything against Boeing or CST-100. I most assuredly don't. There will be enough orbital business to go around.)

[gaetanomarano]

-

the CST-100 looks bigger and better than all other commercial-space spacecrafts and Boeing has surely hundreds times more experience in the design of manned vehicles and space hardware, thousands of engineers and huge own funds, than Sierra Nevada, SpaceX and Blue Origin TOGETHER

-

[gaetanomarano]

-

so, be rational and save money!

-

cut the next CCDev3 budgets by HALF, do leave to Blue Origin and SNC the money already given for CCDev2, fund SpaceX with only $50M on CCDev3 to develop the LAS (the very much bigger Orion's LAS costed about $110M) and invest great part of the CCDev3/4 funds on Boeing (that is the only of the four companies that has the chances to do something good and quickly) giving it $1-2 billion in 2012-14 to have a flying CST-100 sooner, maybe, already in 2015

-

[gaetanomarano]

-

the commercial program is born to save money, so, why waste billion$ funding FOUR similar projects?

-

Blue Origin has 0.001% of the experience of Boeing, Sierra Nevada absolutely CAN'T develop and build a mini-Shuttle with less than funds than used to develop a race car and SpaceX has already developed great part of its Dragon

-

[gaetanomarano]

-

not only, but, the Atlas V engines have also an excellent reliability and very long successful launch records, by themselves, since used in other russian rockets (the first stage engine) and in other american rockets, the second stage engine

-

so, there will be NO story in the Dragon/Falcon-9 vs. CST-100/AtlasV competition, since, the latter, will be the clear winners

-

[gaetanomarano]

-

there are NO comparisons (nor there will be in the near future) between the Atlas V safety, reliability and successful launch record vs. the Falcon-9

-

also, I have many doubts (and I'm not the only) that a TEN engines rocket like the Falcon-9 can ever be man-rated while the Atlas V has only three engines (a twin nozzle one for the first stage and a single engine for the second stage)

-

[Zach121k]

Awesome!