I am sorry I even posted on this dumb thread, try to refrain from your replies, and your holier than thou attitude. after I am just a goyim to you . lol
Yahushua was the most high priest the word made flesh, when he taught in the synagogue he taught the order of the torah the same thing that the Levites did and he is the king of kings
b.t.w. "sedia" means in Bulgarian "sitting" and the people who attend a meeting or a forum are oftenly called "za-sedatel"- a man who is sitting. There fore the judge is also "sittind" - "sedi" (in Bulgarian). There we go to "sedek"so closelly?!
@balkhara Bulgars and Khazars are possibly far descendants of Japeth, according to their history. They would not carry the Shem-itic languages by any stretch of the imagination. (nor would any north semitic cognate)
@KeyboardPacifist Definitly Bulgars has no any hint of semitic language or blood. The explanation for the "Bulgar-Khazar-Jewish"connection is the point that in some 9-10 cent. The nobility of the wide spread Khazar Empire converted to Judaism and inthere the Bulgars who lived within the borders of the Khazar Empire were partly influenced of. Latter on, a huge number of Ascenazi Jewish, originated from the Ex-Khazar Lands moved to E-Europe and during XX cent - to modern Israil... There it is.
@balkhara Yes, I am studied on a certain aspect of their history. There was a time when I chased the goose-trail of the Sumerian language, hoping to find modern remnants. lol. .... Bulgars and Maygars are two ethnicities who carry a language remnant of mystery... perhaps more ancient than many presume. As for the blood-connection - nah. That's silly. The closest connection would be the late 11th and 12th century flight of Bablyonian-Jews who fled the Baghdad Caliphate to Khazaria
It is also strange may be but in many slavic languages "sedia" (near to "sedek" ), means "a judge" - a man dealing with the Law and the rights. "säd" meand "court". And that is not tne only "co-incidence" in thohse so different languages (arabic and hebrew vs. slavic group).
In fact many were trying to finf out and clarify Who was Melchizedek? For me is also strange as he appeared exactly when Avram returned from battle and he passed namelly to Melchizedek the war prisoners includin Loth and his family. Inthere als was pointed "hte King of Sodom". So, wasn't Melchizedek kind of king of Sodom? They were both named twice if three verses only.
@balkhara No, it makes no sense for Abram to give one-tenth of the loot, then turn around and give that same person the other 90 percent of the loot. Salem was the original name of Yerushalayim. Even when the Jebusites took over it .. it retained the name "Salem" in it. Even logically, Sodom was anything but Shalom, lol. Sidim and Gmr (along with the other 3 cities) were between the land of Petra and the dead sea plains.
@balkhara I don't think that anyone's looking, lol. The closest ruins are just south of the Dead Sea. Look up a guy named "Michael Rood." He's one of a few people who actually search out the archeology of the area (atleast he did at one time). The Modern-Jews occasionally dig around there.. but they tend to focus on Hebron, Mt.Ebla, Temple Mount, .. places like that.
@Jacobrester An angel (greek) is a messenger. In Hebrew, they are called Malak. Malak is NOT the same as Eloi (or Elohim). Pretty important difference.
@ultraspirit The answer is YES. Abraham worshiped Melchizedek. Why? because Melchizedek was or is as you say King of all the Angels. Edgar Cayce identified several past lives of Jesus; Adam, Enoch, Melchizedek, Hermes, Joseph, Zend and Amilius. That directly impacted his incarnation in Palestine. As @yourboyken sais the book of Enoch from the dead see scrolls give us more explanation about the divinity of Melchizedek.
@romano78 Edgar Cayce is exactly what the Torah told Believers NOT to trust or follow. His words are worthless for the man of YHSWH. Pretty twisted to say that Abraham worshipped Melchizedek.
You make all these things so complicated guys... If you just red the whole Bible for once, you could find all these "mysteries" really easy to understand!!! God promised to Abraaham, that Jesus would be from his line. And that, cause he was a very good man and did exactly what God commanded him. Simple. Never, in Bible, said that Abraaham worshiped anyone except the only God (YAHWEH). I really cant understand where did you all found such things, and believe in these!!!!
@nebulasxtv Do you realize there aless two Enoch in the bible right one from Cain's line and the other from Seth's line. So city is mostly Cain's Enoch because in genesis it say the Cain had a son name Enoch and Cain build a city name after him.
@strangerinwhite Yeah. It si not a "hard evidence" but makes some sense. Thanks! And what about the so called "Seth"- the "God of underworld"in Egipt? In the same time - "Sathiah" means "holly" in sanscrit and "Saturn" goes to "Sath"+"Ur" ... And from "Satrun"we see "Saturday" - the day, worshipped by the Jewish, and somekind It is said the Bulgaria is also under "The sign of Saturn".... I do not like to pint on fallen angel with this name... How ever if you have some more ideas about that?
@balkhara the greek name Seth, is very different from Saturn ( roman god of agriculture) and very different from Swatah, the Khemti deity. Saturn is not derived from sat+ur), Ur would be a lost name to the Romans and Etruscans. Besides, in Ur, Ninib would be the equivalent.. and that sounds and looks nothing like "Seth."
I'm not counting out Set (in Amos 5:26), but you can not make the name connection to Saturn or Remphan. That would be Icke/Sitchin psuedo-etymology of the ignorant new-age
@KeyboardPacifist The "Sat-Ur"("The Light of Ur") hint for Saturn is quite visible even if not the only explanation possibly to find out.The connection to the ancient Jews (and possibly some other old nations) is twice pointed in the Holly BIble.Once in the Old Testement, once in the mouth of Steven (The Book of Acts) from wich death,Paul was initially stressed.Jesus says "I am the True Light,comming from the Heaven"-unlike the "False Light" pretending from elsewhere,e.g.-The Center of the Earth
@balkhara yes, in English, but "the light of Ur" has nothing to do with the actual usage of the Latin verb "to til the dirt." The name Saturn was not ancient deity's name. There are older names for this false god. The people of Rome/Etruscans would have heard of the Chaldees, Haran, Ashur, Babel, etc ... but Ur would have been long lost as an ancient name.. maybe... 1500 years before the founding of Rome. Saturn, as a Khemti or Caananite god would make sense, but not that name (saturn). shalom
@strangerinwhite All these I mentioned due to the reason that many old books exist and are named after "Seth" and usually they a gnostic in spirit. The reference to Saturn is also seen in Acts, 7:43 in connection with the "old jews" in the time of Moses. "Saturn" points to the city of Ur in Haldea from where Avram and Loth came... So strange all!
@balkhara Chronos or Chiyyun would be unlikely to be mistranslated into Koine from the LXX or P'Shitta. Arabs and Assyrians were not early sources for the Hapiru. It also does not describe Chonsu, the moon-deity of the Khmti. The "remphan" is a Koine-colloquial adjustment for Chiun-Tselem, which is a transliterate title, not a name proper. The astrological deity in question is likely Ptah-Osorapis (Ex32:1), the raised standard of the Solar Bull. This idol is drawn on Sinaic walls
@balkhara I agree with what you are saying about "the dark light" totally, but Satan didn't use "saturn" at that time. There were older names that are nearly forgotten. These names also reflect the same concept that are hinted about by "remphan" of the "Chiyyun" of Amos 5:7. I'm only trying to consider this - so as to shed light on Stephen's testimony of which fallen angel plagued the people. It may or may not be of significance - but I'd still like to know.
@KeyboardPacifist Well if you want to go that route then all together there 4 Enochs in the Old Testament. One is from Seth line who is the great-grandfaher of Noah,another is Cain's son. Then one is Reuben's son and yet another being one of five sons of Midian. But the book of Enoch is usual is given authorship to Enoch the great-grandfaher of Noah. There also two Lamechs,two Gomers,two Cainan and much more .
@KeyboardPacifist I was talking about before the flood because te other ones have no bearing on the book of Enoch nor the city of Enoch build by Cain.
@nebulasxtv the Zecharia Sitchins and David Ickes of the world will always make a living preying on the uneducated. Tenochitchuan doesnt represent the same syllables in Quechua, Maya, or Azteca as used in English or Spanish. And Enoch is poor version of his name. Haa-noke would be better. see how it's less fun to pretend that Haanoke could come from Tenoch?
@balkhara I look at those types.... as false prophets who spread disinformation.
At the same time, we see that Moses, Daniel and Solomon - were each invested in the knowledge of YHWH's truth.... AS WELL AS knowledge of the secular realm that they were trained in.
What I mean to say... is that (if God puts it in your heart) some believers may be here to sift through all levels of all knowledge - guarding your heart and understanding what is a wolf and what is a sheep. Be wise as serpents.
@nebulasxtv It's all good. I love to speculate too :) But I'm not talkling "spelling" i'm talking phonetics. Xian, in Mandarin is nothing like the actual Hebrew name for John (an anglican derivation). Likewise, Enoch is very different from the Hebrew. If you study asphasiology (as I do), you can learn various truth about linguinstics. For example, the Latin and Greek translations transcribe out of convenience - rather than keep the 'mouthing' and annuciation of the originals.
@nebulasxtv I also suspect that ugaritic may be the first language. Their immediate spread of agriculture, out from Sumer (or Cataylfk 1)... leading to Yeryicho ..... coupled with the well-known Ba'al cycle.... leaves me to wonder if : 1) Ugaritic came fr Sumerian. or 2) vice versa or 3) There's no remant of the original languages as YHWH didn't just spread Languages (but forced dialects from opposing thought patterns). Of course, he spread them according the Angels, not languages
@KeyboardPacifist And I'm also with you on the possibility of Telepathy. I fully believe that YHWH allowed our DNA to become polluted and weakened by 2 actions.. 1) Sin is death in the world... and this literally means that the world's "thorns" as said by YHWH (Gen 3) are the viruses and fungi and mutagens (enviromental). and 2) Nephilim after the flood. I too, think that our psychic (natural, not demonic) .. abilities were far enhanced until sin polluted us over time.
that's an interesting idea... but not provable by the mere phonetics of the (-itlan of Nauhtl) and the assumed Hebrew name of Enoch (although I have no reason to believe that Hebrew was the first language... actually, I'm fairly certain that it wasn't).
But that is a cool idea. I like all the ante-diluvian speculations... so long as they don't outright contradict the Pentateuch.
if you get a moment try check out The lost books ,Funny thing is The bible had I think 96 or 92 books then 72 and now has 66.Who decided on the relevance of this and did you know their are 6666 ayats in the quran.
also was the flood all over the world as many cultures record it but the native red indians don't ???
@nebulasxtv Yeah... the "canon" is not a guide for Biblical Infallibility or Innerrency. I believe that our Elders In Christ are inspired... as much or more so than many of the Old Covenant prophets... but I do not think that the contradictions allow us to turn off our brains. I do not fully agree with any cannon. I think that most of the apocrypha is inspired and I would put these in canon (while attaching others as apocrypha, this includes 1 Enoch).
@KeyboardPacifist .. also, in a debate at UC Davis, I heard the "6000 ayah" tale. However, the enormous subjective aspect which can not be reasoned against... puts this in the category of "meh." I mean, Rabbis and Christians believe that there are hundreds of thousands of "signs" of divine influence in the Tanach and New Testament. I fully believe that the "red injuns" can have the Ruach hKodesh, however, their migratory nature has an impact on their oral traditions/history.
Ok PPl Melchesidek and Yashua are the same man Manifest in different eras to perform the same task in different dispensations Both The Son on God of the Holy Trinity. Highest Priests After the order of Melchesidec/k To Be Christed means to be perfectly balanced. Remember Christ represents a title and not a name. Emmanu'el(which is his name) Shows the Angelic invocation of Christ. Melchesidek = King of Peace King Of RIGHTEOUSNESS! for more schooling simply drop me a line. Im frm the lion race
To Make A Long Story Short King Emmanuel King of the Bobo Shanti house of rasta is Melchesidek King Of Salem Without Father and without Mother having no beginning of days nor end of life but made like unto the son of God yes this is a Divine priesthood Livity of robe and turban from creation and we as the Bobo Shanti will fullfill Biblical prophecy through world peace call
so all the stuff that this man has been teaching is lies? has anyone researched? coz some of the stuff sounds too good to be true.....like the sacred healing water and the merkaba meditation bullshit.....etc. I hate pple like this who lie to thousands/millions of pple just to make more money on theri part.....JEEZ
Melchizedek , whose name literally meanse in Ge'ez(Ethiopic): "king of the Truth" or the Righteous king of Salem meanse Peace , was the one elected by God for the execution of the Third covenant. Recognized as the precursor of Jesus Christ and begotten of the unified and reinstated seed of Noah that sprung from the triad race composed of the descendants of Shem, Ham and Japhet, he Melchizedek, appeared in the Bible as a symbol of the Eternal Entity of the Kingdom of God on Earth.
Melchizedek is a type of Jesus Christ (His preincarnate). Hence, using the same symbols of bread (Body) and wine (Blood) given to bless Abraham. In the NT, Jesus Christ was mentioned to be the King-Priest in the order of Melchizedek.
@hairybuck .... a "type" is not the same as a "pre-incarnate" A type merely means, 'a symbol', a person who can be seen to act in way that prophesies things to come. Example, Yehoshua of Zech.2 is a 'type' of Christ. Yehoshua, the successor to Moshe was a type as well. Yusef (son of Jacob) was a 'type of Christ' and so on. A pre-incarnate is saying that Melchizedek was Jesus in-cognito, not yet revealed as The Lamb of God. That's radically different.
MalchiSadq, My King is Righteous! That is what it means. The name of this Priest-King is interchanged in the OT with AdoniSadq Which means My Lord is Righteous. MalchiSadq/AdoniSadq was none other then the patriarch Shem, the son of Noach who live to see Abraham! He was one of the last witnesses of the Deluge!
That make sense because Shem live to the age of 600 Therefore, his death took place thirteen years after the death of Sarah and ten years after Rebekah and Isaac married.
The Divine and Mighty Melchizidek is without father and mother born of no earthly womb he is the Christed ONE of the Blessed and Holy trinity and was made Manifest and Emmanuel(Yashua,Jes-us) to give his life as a blood sacrifice to save the world from sin! All Power Honor and Glory due unto our God and KING The Great Lion JAH RASTAFARI!!
@strangerinwhite Book of Hebrews, chapter 7, verse 3, we are told that Melchizedek has neither a mother nor a father, nor a natural birth.. and that he is immortal. And two chapters later, in Hebrews chapter 9, verse 27, we are given the parameters of chapters of humankind. A man is born, dies once (no reincarnation) then off to face judgement. Only an Angel, a Bene Elohim "son of God" fits. And, sure enough, this verse (7:3) says just that - that Melchizedek is fashioned this way
@KeyboardPacifist Thank you but I just ask for the verse and chapter to see it for my self not a big theological talk on it and I'm just thought Shem chould have been Melchizedek because it's chould have been a title and I never said Melchizedek was reincarnation of Shem because Shem lived 600 years because he was born before the flood and which after that mankind started to live shorter lives.
@kuonankrma If all we had was the witness of Moshe, then I'd agree. Many Talmudic Jews have felt the same. But as Follower of Christ, I honor the Holy Canon of the Saints. The book of Hebrews (chapters 6 to 7) give an account of Melchizedek that lets us know that this priest had no mother or father. Shem was the son of Noah, ruling him out as a candidate. Also, The Sons of Shem traveled from the east ... to Sumer. Jerusalem is the opposite direction.
hey a bastard man have fake his name and change it to Drunvalo Melchizedek like the "priest of God Most High."
He also have said that he is the reincarnation of Sai Baba a reincarnation of Vishnu.
Making fake tricks on the streets of India he claim his self as Sai BaBa then he get a lot of followers then whit a lot of superstition he abuse of his youngs students male and females saying that it was part of the rituals .
This guy have to be in Jail because of fraud or at least someone kill him.
Just look for other tribes or nations worshiping the same God or being open-minded towards Him.
SAME GOD:
- Melchizedek, king of Salem (future Jerusalem)
- Bileam
- Abraham's family in Haran
- Job, east of Israel during Abraham
OPEN MINDED:
- Abimelech, and the Pharaoh of Egypt during Abraham
- Jethro the father in law of Moses
- The Sumerians, God took Abraham away from there because they worshiped other Gods, implying that the religion originally was not about Enki or Enlil astronauts
Now here is some more... An-Lil was the Most High, until the people perverted the worship. The Semitics continued to call Him "El Elyon" and "El Saddai" until He revealed His title as "The Self-Existing One." The Pharoah of Abraham was not a Pharoah at all. He was a King. Big difference. The Pharoah means something entirely different. The family in Haran were quite pagan.
The religious meaning of a person's name occurs in many instances in the Bible, so Melchizedek isn't that extraordinary in this respect. It only shows that Abraham wasn't the only one in his time who was faithful to God, but others at the time (descendent from Noah, supposedly) could also be, just like Abraham. Even in foreign and non-Jewish nations.
@baetores Yes, there were some who worshipped The Most High, but The Most High only made a covenant with Avram. That's what really matters. After the Tower of Babel incident, several hundred years went by where God had no one to call "His Witness."
i cant agree with that because for the fact that Because King Melchizedek was a perfect example, He was a King and a Priest, no one was both of these but Yeshua Himeself.
@djjuan84 Christ did not perform priestly duties. The sacrifice of Christ was the atonement as the one and only intercession for humanity. That's radically different than a levite. YhWH said that The Israelites would be a priesthood to all nations. In this sense, every King of Israel was a King and Priest. Melchizedek was an Angel and Ruler of the Holy Mt.Zion. His time was limited and he served a limited purpose. He was a type of Christ.... not an incarnate.
@nohealthcare62 a devil and a demon are 2 different things. You are confused. But yes... Melchizedek was not a mortal man. He was an immortal Angel. He was a servant of YHWH, not Christ.
it means nothing lol, God is not name or person place or thing. It is most likely a spirit, a Holy Spirit and this spirit is one of Divine and Very Pure LOVE. thats all you need to know.
@WhiteSage777 sounds very new-age and relativistic what is pure love ? can a human explain it ? .. or will they always use their own standards? We need to know more than "god's some type of spirit" God is more than just the Jedi Force.
@KeyboardPacifist I am sorry how it sounds but you are right one cannot explain it, you would need to experience it and that is how I know. Although I do not subscribe to any religion this experience has been known as Kundalini, You could try to study or research it but it would not matter unless you KNEW it yourself. Noone can talk you into it, you cannot experience by reading etc. it has to be a full body mind spirit experience. I guess you can call it enlightenment :)
@WhiteSage777 I've engaged in Qigong and Yoga from a young age, and have astral travelled since my preteen years. I'm well aware of what Kundalini is and it has nothing to do with religion. It is a natural force. It is not enlightenment. However, that does not take away the testimony of the Tanakh or Gospel of Yehshua. Here, The Creator is described as a Spirit Enitity which is bigger than our universe - and within it simulaneously. We answer to this Spirit. We do NOT define God or Love.
@KeyboardPacifist There are many levels of astral travel just as there are many levels of "kundalini and I already said it is just a term, why are you so stuck on words and terms? usually people who lack experience are stuck on terms and they hope they can intellectualize everything, you cannot.
@deritpeehs If you don't know the past - you cant know who or what you are. Without such knowledge, you are mere sheep and pawn of every force and whim. Such a person walks around blindly judging and following every new theory and scoffing at every holy thing. What a sad, blind state.
there is no peace if melchizedek is "in charge". he got stuck with an ancient and outdated philosophy for too long. made him and many others very sick but morons kept pushing it on him and others. similar to a Godless mafia. "control" (Godless0 at the expense of themselves and others.
I find it interesting that the only way you would have ever heard of this name is through the scriptures. Yet you fail to look there to find out the mystery. In the Old Testament Melchizedek is mentioned twice in Genesis 14:18-20 and in Psalms 110:4. In the New Testament he is mentioned only in the Epistle to the Hebrews chapter seven. By studying these texts, what have you found out so far.
Ultra, the fact is you cannot unveil this meaning yet. It is not time for it to be revealed but you and I can try our best to make whatever we can out of it....it is difficult to understand God's ways though with our simple carnal minds...agreed?
Melchizedek = KING OF SALEM which means "KING OF RIGHTEOUSNESS" SALEM = Peace or "KING OF PEACE"
COULD it be possible that the symbol of BREAD and WINE were a foreshadowing 2,000 years before Christ came to the cross for our sins and that the BREAD and WINE was a symbol of His death on the Cross?
Just as people look back on Christ's death on the Cross today; could this have been a way of Abraham looking ahead, on the other side of the mirror in anticipation of the remembrance of Jesus? Could Abraham have been the first to take of the COMMUNION?
This Melchizedek has been a 'mysterious' character for a long time Ultra, you're right it is not over. I don't want to fight with you...but I know you are going to keep twisting and twisting it to fit it into your cult to make it fit into Islam. You don't use the original verses it was originally found in!!!!
Yeah, I'll stay tuned, but keep searching..I ENCOURAGE IT. Why don't you quote HEBREWS?
Have you looked up the scriptures and how they say that the Old Testament Melchizedek is the King of Salem? Meaning....the New Testament KING OF JERUSALEM, JESUS CHRIST. Could have been a theophany or pre-incarnate JESUS CHRIST. There are many appearances of CHRIST in the Old Testament before he appeared in the New Testament.
Melchizedek appeared before Abraham in Genesis 14:18, "And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth BREAD and WINE: and he was the priest of the most high God."
"And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it; For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins."
"But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom."
@ultraspirit Well if you read the book of Enoch from the dead sea scrolls you will find that Melchizedek was born and became a fully developed man very quickly born of a dead woman and was taken up to heaven to be reserved for the last days, its amazing book. Dead sea scrolls revealed so much!
@ultraspirit And you think that Abraham spoke modern Hebrew, or arabic ? ... and you don't study it as a Northern Semitic word ? lol. ... riiiight. "King" is an abstract title, where "malak," is a concrete ancient word tied to landscape. It means "one of elevated status," as in a hill. It applied to rulers and ambassadors (ie, messengers and angels). the Tzedeq-Malak, can mean, a "righteous ruler." Note: he was a Kohen and a Ruler, but not God, nor an Angel.
@Isaac0711 What is also strange for me is that the word "tzedek" ("sedek") closelly correspondes to the bulgarian (slavic) word "sad" or "sed" (съд), what means "court". The word "court" is closelly related to the rights and "righteous" even in some various aspects - civil or religious. Hence съд goes to sedek ("tzedek").
@Isaac0711 From other side, a councill member is called "zasedatel", derived from "sedya" (sitting). "Zasedatel" means a member who is in proces of any councill /jury/ discussion. So za-seda-tel correspondes to a jury member and so goes to sedeq /tzedek/, which is righteous.
אני כאן! יש לי את התשובות! אז אנא מאמין בי
jasonfromnola 8 months ago
Melchizedek is a soul that can move trough other dimentions. Just like Jesus was. I know people will get offended here. but hey
14HACK3R 1 year ago
@14HACK3R I'm not offended. Let me offend a little bit more. I know Melchizedek is physically manifested within a human body.
BoasTherkildsen 11 months ago
I am sorry I even posted on this dumb thread, try to refrain from your replies, and your holier than thou attitude. after I am just a goyim to you . lol
WhiteSage777 1 year ago
Yahushua was the most high priest the word made flesh, when he taught in the synagogue he taught the order of the torah the same thing that the Levites did and he is the king of kings
djjuan84 1 year ago
b.t.w. "sedia" means in Bulgarian "sitting" and the people who attend a meeting or a forum are oftenly called "za-sedatel"- a man who is sitting. There fore the judge is also "sittind" - "sedi" (in Bulgarian). There we go to "sedek"so closelly?!
balkhara 1 year ago
@balkhara Bulgars and Khazars are possibly far descendants of Japeth, according to their history. They would not carry the Shem-itic languages by any stretch of the imagination. (nor would any north semitic cognate)
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@KeyboardPacifist Definitly Bulgars has no any hint of semitic language or blood. The explanation for the "Bulgar-Khazar-Jewish"connection is the point that in some 9-10 cent. The nobility of the wide spread Khazar Empire converted to Judaism and inthere the Bulgars who lived within the borders of the Khazar Empire were partly influenced of. Latter on, a huge number of Ascenazi Jewish, originated from the Ex-Khazar Lands moved to E-Europe and during XX cent - to modern Israil... There it is.
balkhara 1 year ago
@balkhara Yes, I am studied on a certain aspect of their history. There was a time when I chased the goose-trail of the Sumerian language, hoping to find modern remnants. lol. .... Bulgars and Maygars are two ethnicities who carry a language remnant of mystery... perhaps more ancient than many presume. As for the blood-connection - nah. That's silly. The closest connection would be the late 11th and 12th century flight of Bablyonian-Jews who fled the Baghdad Caliphate to Khazaria
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
It is also strange may be but in many slavic languages "sedia" (near to "sedek" ), means "a judge" - a man dealing with the Law and the rights. "säd" meand "court". And that is not tne only "co-incidence" in thohse so different languages (arabic and hebrew vs. slavic group).
balkhara 1 year ago
In fact many were trying to finf out and clarify Who was Melchizedek? For me is also strange as he appeared exactly when Avram returned from battle and he passed namelly to Melchizedek the war prisoners includin Loth and his family. Inthere als was pointed "hte King of Sodom". So, wasn't Melchizedek kind of king of Sodom? They were both named twice if three verses only.
balkhara 1 year ago
@balkhara No, it makes no sense for Abram to give one-tenth of the loot, then turn around and give that same person the other 90 percent of the loot. Salem was the original name of Yerushalayim. Even when the Jebusites took over it .. it retained the name "Salem" in it. Even logically, Sodom was anything but Shalom, lol. Sidim and Gmr (along with the other 3 cities) were between the land of Petra and the dead sea plains.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@KeyboardPacifist Thanks for the clarification! Actually do you know if under the Dead sea there are some sunk settlements?
balkhara 1 year ago
@balkhara I don't think that anyone's looking, lol. The closest ruins are just south of the Dead Sea. Look up a guy named "Michael Rood." He's one of a few people who actually search out the archeology of the area (atleast he did at one time). The Modern-Jews occasionally dig around there.. but they tend to focus on Hebron, Mt.Ebla, Temple Mount, .. places like that.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
Melchizedek was God
Jacobrester 1 year ago
@Jacobrester That says ap. Paul also.
balkhara 1 year ago
@Jacobrester An angel (greek) is a messenger. In Hebrew, they are called Malak. Malak is NOT the same as Eloi (or Elohim). Pretty important difference.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@ultraspirit The answer is YES. Abraham worshiped Melchizedek. Why? because Melchizedek was or is as you say King of all the Angels. Edgar Cayce identified several past lives of Jesus; Adam, Enoch, Melchizedek, Hermes, Joseph, Zend and Amilius. That directly impacted his incarnation in Palestine. As @yourboyken sais the book of Enoch from the dead see scrolls give us more explanation about the divinity of Melchizedek.
romano78 1 year ago
@romano78 Edgar Cayce is exactly what the Torah told Believers NOT to trust or follow. His words are worthless for the man of YHSWH. Pretty twisted to say that Abraham worshipped Melchizedek.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
Melchizedeik ... is not just a king and not just an angel.. King of justice/king of peace ...
The scriptures in the end times reveals the name of the trinity ?
We say in the name of father , son and holy spirit ? what are the names?
Those who call the name of the lord will be saved ? whats the name?
the truth is revealed in one part of the earth.... by a person sent by god
umeshj79 1 year ago
You make all these things so complicated guys... If you just red the whole Bible for once, you could find all these "mysteries" really easy to understand!!! God promised to Abraaham, that Jesus would be from his line. And that, cause he was a very good man and did exactly what God commanded him. Simple. Never, in Bible, said that Abraaham worshiped anyone except the only God (YAHWEH). I really cant understand where did you all found such things, and believe in these!!!!
teaeleden 1 year ago 2
@teaeleden well said.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
I read somewhere that Enoch had a city nemed after himself in South America named Tenochitchuan..
nebulasxtv 1 year ago
@nebulasxtv Do you realize there aless two Enoch in the bible right one from Cain's line and the other from Seth's line. So city is mostly Cain's Enoch because in genesis it say the Cain had a son name Enoch and Cain build a city name after him.
strangerinwhite 1 year ago
@strangerinwhite I also asked myself to which Enoch refers the Book of Enoch? - The "hidden"one (aphocriphy). O hope - the one from Seth (Sit).
balkhara 1 year ago
@balkhara Most likely it is because only the Enoch of Seth was taken up to heaven and didn't dead so it is said in the book of Genesis.
strangerinwhite 1 year ago
@strangerinwhite Yeah. It si not a "hard evidence" but makes some sense. Thanks! And what about the so called "Seth"- the "God of underworld"in Egipt? In the same time - "Sathiah" means "holly" in sanscrit and "Saturn" goes to "Sath"+"Ur" ... And from "Satrun"we see "Saturday" - the day, worshipped by the Jewish, and somekind It is said the Bulgaria is also under "The sign of Saturn".... I do not like to pint on fallen angel with this name... How ever if you have some more ideas about that?
balkhara 1 year ago
@balkhara the greek name Seth, is very different from Saturn ( roman god of agriculture) and very different from Swatah, the Khemti deity. Saturn is not derived from sat+ur), Ur would be a lost name to the Romans and Etruscans. Besides, in Ur, Ninib would be the equivalent.. and that sounds and looks nothing like "Seth."
I'm not counting out Set (in Amos 5:26), but you can not make the name connection to Saturn or Remphan. That would be Icke/Sitchin psuedo-etymology of the ignorant new-age
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@KeyboardPacifist The "Sat-Ur"("The Light of Ur") hint for Saturn is quite visible even if not the only explanation possibly to find out.The connection to the ancient Jews (and possibly some other old nations) is twice pointed in the Holly BIble.Once in the Old Testement, once in the mouth of Steven (The Book of Acts) from wich death,Paul was initially stressed.Jesus says "I am the True Light,comming from the Heaven"-unlike the "False Light" pretending from elsewhere,e.g.-The Center of the Earth
balkhara 1 year ago
@balkhara yes, in English, but "the light of Ur" has nothing to do with the actual usage of the Latin verb "to til the dirt." The name Saturn was not ancient deity's name. There are older names for this false god. The people of Rome/Etruscans would have heard of the Chaldees, Haran, Ashur, Babel, etc ... but Ur would have been long lost as an ancient name.. maybe... 1500 years before the founding of Rome. Saturn, as a Khemti or Caananite god would make sense, but not that name (saturn). shalom
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
Comment removed
balkhara 1 year ago
@strangerinwhite All these I mentioned due to the reason that many old books exist and are named after "Seth" and usually they a gnostic in spirit. The reference to Saturn is also seen in Acts, 7:43 in connection with the "old jews" in the time of Moses. "Saturn" points to the city of Ur in Haldea from where Avram and Loth came... So strange all!
balkhara 1 year ago
@balkhara Chronos or Chiyyun would be unlikely to be mistranslated into Koine from the LXX or P'Shitta. Arabs and Assyrians were not early sources for the Hapiru. It also does not describe Chonsu, the moon-deity of the Khmti. The "remphan" is a Koine-colloquial adjustment for Chiun-Tselem, which is a transliterate title, not a name proper. The astrological deity in question is likely Ptah-Osorapis (Ex32:1), the raised standard of the Solar Bull. This idol is drawn on Sinaic walls
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@KeyboardPacifist Thanks again! Here on this point I will need to read more :)
balkhara 1 year ago
@balkhara I agree with what you are saying about "the dark light" totally, but Satan didn't use "saturn" at that time. There were older names that are nearly forgotten. These names also reflect the same concept that are hinted about by "remphan" of the "Chiyyun" of Amos 5:7. I'm only trying to consider this - so as to shed light on Stephen's testimony of which fallen angel plagued the people. It may or may not be of significance - but I'd still like to know.
shalom
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@balkhara In the Book of Enoch, his sons and grandsons are methusaleh, Lamech and Noah.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@KeyboardPacifist Yes, I know this book. But why a lot of people do not accept this book as a "righteos" scripture?
balkhara 1 year ago
@strangerinwhite There's another Enoch (the grandson of Jacob through Reuben).
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@KeyboardPacifist .... and also, another Enoch, the Uncle of Jacob.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@KeyboardPacifist Well if you want to go that route then all together there 4 Enochs in the Old Testament. One is from Seth line who is the great-grandfaher of Noah,another is Cain's son. Then one is Reuben's son and yet another being one of five sons of Midian. But the book of Enoch is usual is given authorship to Enoch the great-grandfaher of Noah. There also two Lamechs,two Gomers,two Cainan and much more .
strangerinwhite 1 year ago
@KeyboardPacifist I was talking about before the flood because te other ones have no bearing on the book of Enoch nor the city of Enoch build by Cain.
strangerinwhite 1 year ago
@nebulasxtv the Zecharia Sitchins and David Ickes of the world will always make a living preying on the uneducated. Tenochitchuan doesnt represent the same syllables in Quechua, Maya, or Azteca as used in English or Spanish. And Enoch is poor version of his name. Haa-noke would be better. see how it's less fun to pretend that Haanoke could come from Tenoch?
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@KeyboardPacifist Zecharia Sitchins and David Ickes really seem to be a "paid-for-click" authors.... I do not trust then a single word...
balkhara 1 year ago
@balkhara I look at those types.... as false prophets who spread disinformation.
At the same time, we see that Moses, Daniel and Solomon - were each invested in the knowledge of YHWH's truth.... AS WELL AS knowledge of the secular realm that they were trained in.
What I mean to say... is that (if God puts it in your heart) some believers may be here to sift through all levels of all knowledge - guarding your heart and understanding what is a wolf and what is a sheep. Be wise as serpents.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@KeyboardPacifist Hey bro,jus sharing the water .
Did you know that the letter T was a sound used at the beginning of all words in the city of Tenochititlan,and that the world means city of enoch.
Also the spelling haa-noke is really not that far from the name enoch,
Maybe it's like the chinese say xian as in juan in spanish or john in English.
The letter j has only been in use 500,600 years and jesus would have been called an aramaic name version of jesus which is yeheshua.
nebulasxtv 1 year ago
@nebulasxtv It's all good. I love to speculate too :) But I'm not talkling "spelling" i'm talking phonetics. Xian, in Mandarin is nothing like the actual Hebrew name for John (an anglican derivation). Likewise, Enoch is very different from the Hebrew. If you study asphasiology (as I do), you can learn various truth about linguinstics. For example, the Latin and Greek translations transcribe out of convenience - rather than keep the 'mouthing' and annuciation of the originals.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@KeyboardPacifist know much about ugaritic or what genesis was first wriitten in before hebrew..
what language did God speak to Adam in
we all babeling since the time of babylon...
Maybe we we're using telepathy ,the unspoken word,thats one use for the mysterious glands in our brain cosmic implants..
laters
nebulasxtv 1 year ago
@nebulasxtv I also suspect that ugaritic may be the first language. Their immediate spread of agriculture, out from Sumer (or Cataylfk 1)... leading to Yeryicho ..... coupled with the well-known Ba'al cycle.... leaves me to wonder if : 1) Ugaritic came fr Sumerian. or 2) vice versa or 3) There's no remant of the original languages as YHWH didn't just spread Languages (but forced dialects from opposing thought patterns). Of course, he spread them according the Angels, not languages
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@KeyboardPacifist And I'm also with you on the possibility of Telepathy. I fully believe that YHWH allowed our DNA to become polluted and weakened by 2 actions.. 1) Sin is death in the world... and this literally means that the world's "thorns" as said by YHWH (Gen 3) are the viruses and fungi and mutagens (enviromental). and 2) Nephilim after the flood. I too, think that our psychic (natural, not demonic) .. abilities were far enhanced until sin polluted us over time.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@nebulasxtv
that's an interesting idea... but not provable by the mere phonetics of the (-itlan of Nauhtl) and the assumed Hebrew name of Enoch (although I have no reason to believe that Hebrew was the first language... actually, I'm fairly certain that it wasn't).
But that is a cool idea. I like all the ante-diluvian speculations... so long as they don't outright contradict the Pentateuch.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@KeyboardPacifist
if you get a moment try check out The lost books ,Funny thing is The bible had I think 96 or 92 books then 72 and now has 66.Who decided on the relevance of this and did you know their are 6666 ayats in the quran.
also was the flood all over the world as many cultures record it but the native red indians don't ???
Did these people have the holy spirit ??
The saga continues ...lol
nebulasxtv 1 year ago
@nebulasxtv Yeah... the "canon" is not a guide for Biblical Infallibility or Innerrency. I believe that our Elders In Christ are inspired... as much or more so than many of the Old Covenant prophets... but I do not think that the contradictions allow us to turn off our brains. I do not fully agree with any cannon. I think that most of the apocrypha is inspired and I would put these in canon (while attaching others as apocrypha, this includes 1 Enoch).
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@KeyboardPacifist .. also, in a debate at UC Davis, I heard the "6000 ayah" tale. However, the enormous subjective aspect which can not be reasoned against... puts this in the category of "meh." I mean, Rabbis and Christians believe that there are hundreds of thousands of "signs" of divine influence in the Tanach and New Testament. I fully believe that the "red injuns" can have the Ruach hKodesh, however, their migratory nature has an impact on their oral traditions/history.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
Melchizedek (King or an Angel?)
"Angel(s) of ..............( which is part of the 'Good will' in our soul)
Not King(s) or Angel(s) of truth.
Sadly enough some important ancient words are mistranslated, i can only guess maybe because of the unknown root....
This happened in Arabic as well in modern Israeli Hebrew, not mixed with ancient Hebrew (lost language).
zouwida 1 year ago
King of all the Angles? As in alignments? :)))) Hallelujah for December 23, 2007.
Lucienization 2 years ago
My Name iS melchizedek . XD
SubliminalWhisper 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Abraham was gay.
SirianKings 2 years ago
I love the mystery around Melchizedek. So epic in potential, like a real fairy tale.
RabbitDance 2 years ago
РУНВАЛО-Я В МОСКВЕ!ТЫ ДОЛЖЕН ЗАБРАТЬ МЕНЯ!ВРЕМЯ ПРИШЛО!
kyndalini 2 years ago
Ok PPl Melchesidek and Yashua are the same man Manifest in different eras to perform the same task in different dispensations Both The Son on God of the Holy Trinity. Highest Priests After the order of Melchesidec/k To Be Christed means to be perfectly balanced. Remember Christ represents a title and not a name. Emmanu'el(which is his name) Shows the Angelic invocation of Christ. Melchesidek = King of Peace King Of RIGHTEOUSNESS! for more schooling simply drop me a line. Im frm the lion race
DamianLindsay 2 years ago
To Make A Long Story Short King Emmanuel King of the Bobo Shanti house of rasta is Melchesidek King Of Salem Without Father and without Mother having no beginning of days nor end of life but made like unto the son of God yes this is a Divine priesthood Livity of robe and turban from creation and we as the Bobo Shanti will fullfill Biblical prophecy through world peace call
DamianLindsay 2 years ago
wow this is such a lie turts me
super2pac 3 years ago
so all the stuff that this man has been teaching is lies? has anyone researched? coz some of the stuff sounds too good to be true.....like the sacred healing water and the merkaba meditation bullshit.....etc. I hate pple like this who lie to thousands/millions of pple just to make more money on theri part.....JEEZ
mmaghfai 3 years ago
thats why those people will suffer! because you can't use this art for greed! only to help people and spiritually empower yourself.
romrolando 2 years ago
i finally know that my name really came from the bible that my mother gave me
melchvinsanity15 3 years ago
your name is Melchizrdek? FTW!
RabbitDance 2 years ago
Melchizedek , whose name literally meanse in Ge'ez(Ethiopic): "king of the Truth" or the Righteous king of Salem meanse Peace , was the one elected by God for the execution of the Third covenant. Recognized as the precursor of Jesus Christ and begotten of the unified and reinstated seed of Noah that sprung from the triad race composed of the descendants of Shem, Ham and Japhet, he Melchizedek, appeared in the Bible as a symbol of the Eternal Entity of the Kingdom of God on Earth.
selam4ethiopia 3 years ago
Melchizedek is a type of Jesus Christ (His preincarnate). Hence, using the same symbols of bread (Body) and wine (Blood) given to bless Abraham. In the NT, Jesus Christ was mentioned to be the King-Priest in the order of Melchizedek.
hairybuck 3 years ago
@hairybuck .... a "type" is not the same as a "pre-incarnate" A type merely means, 'a symbol', a person who can be seen to act in way that prophesies things to come. Example, Yehoshua of Zech.2 is a 'type' of Christ. Yehoshua, the successor to Moshe was a type as well. Yusef (son of Jacob) was a 'type of Christ' and so on. A pre-incarnate is saying that Melchizedek was Jesus in-cognito, not yet revealed as The Lamb of God. That's radically different.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
Where can I get the music that you used? It's great! I love it!
todd7416 3 years ago
MalchiSadq, My King is Righteous! That is what it means. The name of this Priest-King is interchanged in the OT with AdoniSadq Which means My Lord is Righteous. MalchiSadq/AdoniSadq was none other then the patriarch Shem, the son of Noach who live to see Abraham! He was one of the last witnesses of the Deluge!
kuonankrma 3 years ago
That make sense because Shem live to the age of 600 Therefore, his death took place thirteen years after the death of Sarah and ten years after Rebekah and Isaac married.
strangerinwhite 2 years ago
The Divine and Mighty Melchizidek is without father and mother born of no earthly womb he is the Christed ONE of the Blessed and Holy trinity and was made Manifest and Emmanuel(Yashua,Jes-us) to give his life as a blood sacrifice to save the world from sin! All Power Honor and Glory due unto our God and KING The Great Lion JAH RASTAFARI!!
DamianLindsay 2 years ago
@strangerinwhite Yet we are told in the book of Hebrews that Melchizedek is not a mortal man.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@KeyboardPacifist Can you tell me what verse and chapter that is at so I see it for myself please?
strangerinwhite 1 year ago
@strangerinwhite Book of Hebrews, chapter 7, verse 3, we are told that Melchizedek has neither a mother nor a father, nor a natural birth.. and that he is immortal. And two chapters later, in Hebrews chapter 9, verse 27, we are given the parameters of chapters of humankind. A man is born, dies once (no reincarnation) then off to face judgement. Only an Angel, a Bene Elohim "son of God" fits. And, sure enough, this verse (7:3) says just that - that Melchizedek is fashioned this way
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@KeyboardPacifist Thank you but I just ask for the verse and chapter to see it for my self not a big theological talk on it and I'm just thought Shem chould have been Melchizedek because it's chould have been a title and I never said Melchizedek was reincarnation of Shem because Shem lived 600 years because he was born before the flood and which after that mankind started to live shorter lives.
strangerinwhite 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Melchizedeik ... is not just a king and not just an angel.. King of justice/king of peace ...
The scriptures in the end times reveals the name of the trinity ?
We say in the name of father , son and holy spirit ? what are the names?
Those who call the name of the lord will be saved ? whats the name?
the truth is revealed in one part of the earth.... by a person sent by god
umeshj79 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Melchizedeik ... is not just a king and not just an angel.. King of justice/king of peace ...
The scriptures in the end times reveals the name of the trinity ?
We say in the name of father , son and holy spirit ? what are the names?
Those who call the name of the lord will be saved ? whats the name?
the truth is revealed in one part of the earth.... by a person sent by god
umeshj79 1 year ago
@kuonankrma If all we had was the witness of Moshe, then I'd agree. Many Talmudic Jews have felt the same. But as Follower of Christ, I honor the Holy Canon of the Saints. The book of Hebrews (chapters 6 to 7) give an account of Melchizedek that lets us know that this priest had no mother or father. Shem was the son of Noah, ruling him out as a candidate. Also, The Sons of Shem traveled from the east ... to Sumer. Jerusalem is the opposite direction.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
hey a bastard man have fake his name and change it to Drunvalo Melchizedek like the "priest of God Most High."
He also have said that he is the reincarnation of Sai Baba a reincarnation of Vishnu.
Making fake tricks on the streets of India he claim his self as Sai BaBa then he get a lot of followers then whit a lot of superstition he abuse of his youngs students male and females saying that it was part of the rituals .
This guy have to be in Jail because of fraud or at least someone kill him.
VRJaguarandi 4 years ago
Just look for other tribes or nations worshiping the same God or being open-minded towards Him.
SAME GOD:
- Melchizedek, king of Salem (future Jerusalem)
- Bileam
- Abraham's family in Haran
- Job, east of Israel during Abraham
OPEN MINDED:
- Abimelech, and the Pharaoh of Egypt during Abraham
- Jethro the father in law of Moses
- The Sumerians, God took Abraham away from there because they worshiped other Gods, implying that the religion originally was not about Enki or Enlil astronauts
baetores 4 years ago
@baetores How is that open-minded ?
That's just education.
Now here is some more... An-Lil was the Most High, until the people perverted the worship. The Semitics continued to call Him "El Elyon" and "El Saddai" until He revealed His title as "The Self-Existing One." The Pharoah of Abraham was not a Pharoah at all. He was a King. Big difference. The Pharoah means something entirely different. The family in Haran were quite pagan.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
The religious meaning of a person's name occurs in many instances in the Bible, so Melchizedek isn't that extraordinary in this respect. It only shows that Abraham wasn't the only one in his time who was faithful to God, but others at the time (descendent from Noah, supposedly) could also be, just like Abraham. Even in foreign and non-Jewish nations.
baetores 4 years ago
@baetores Yes, there were some who worshipped The Most High, but The Most High only made a covenant with Avram. That's what really matters. After the Tower of Babel incident, several hundred years went by where God had no one to call "His Witness."
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
Melchizedek was a type and shadow of the Messiah to come who was Yashua
djjuan84 4 years ago
Yep, absolutely correct...
mackave48214 4 years ago
THANK YOU! Someone has a brain.
deconomou 3 years ago
It is Shem 3 sons of Noah ! YHWH changed his name !
ASHRAUD 3 years ago
i cant agree with that because for the fact that Because King Melchizedek was a perfect example, He was a King and a Priest, no one was both of these but Yeshua Himeself.
djjuan84 3 years ago
@djjuan84 Christ did not perform priestly duties. The sacrifice of Christ was the atonement as the one and only intercession for humanity. That's radically different than a levite. YhWH said that The Israelites would be a priesthood to all nations. In this sense, every King of Israel was a King and Priest. Melchizedek was an Angel and Ruler of the Holy Mt.Zion. His time was limited and he served a limited purpose. He was a type of Christ.... not an incarnate.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@ASHRAUD Read Hebews chapter 6 and 7.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
I think King of all the Angels...is the right angle hahaha!!
Angel101974 4 years ago
I know who he is ! Ask any Priest who HE is and if they say "just a man" your talking to a DEVIL (demon) in the flesh .
nohealthcare62 4 years ago
@nohealthcare62 a devil and a demon are 2 different things. You are confused. But yes... Melchizedek was not a mortal man. He was an immortal Angel. He was a servant of YHWH, not Christ.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
it means nothing lol, God is not name or person place or thing. It is most likely a spirit, a Holy Spirit and this spirit is one of Divine and Very Pure LOVE. thats all you need to know.
WhiteSage777 4 years ago
@WhiteSage777 sounds very new-age and relativistic what is pure love ? can a human explain it ? .. or will they always use their own standards? We need to know more than "god's some type of spirit" God is more than just the Jedi Force.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@KeyboardPacifist I am sorry how it sounds but you are right one cannot explain it, you would need to experience it and that is how I know. Although I do not subscribe to any religion this experience has been known as Kundalini, You could try to study or research it but it would not matter unless you KNEW it yourself. Noone can talk you into it, you cannot experience by reading etc. it has to be a full body mind spirit experience. I guess you can call it enlightenment :)
WhiteSage777 1 year ago
@WhiteSage777 I've engaged in Qigong and Yoga from a young age, and have astral travelled since my preteen years. I'm well aware of what Kundalini is and it has nothing to do with religion. It is a natural force. It is not enlightenment. However, that does not take away the testimony of the Tanakh or Gospel of Yehshua. Here, The Creator is described as a Spirit Enitity which is bigger than our universe - and within it simulaneously. We answer to this Spirit. We do NOT define God or Love.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
@KeyboardPacifist There are many levels of astral travel just as there are many levels of "kundalini and I already said it is just a term, why are you so stuck on words and terms? usually people who lack experience are stuck on terms and they hope they can intellectualize everything, you cannot.
WhiteSage777 1 year ago
ok who wrote the book of Malaki (Malaki Yi) and what does this word mean?? ok you see the tie to malchizedek
guada71 4 years ago
his followers are like a braindead Godless group of puppets, too much in the past.
deritpeehs 4 years ago
@deritpeehs If you don't know the past - you cant know who or what you are. Without such knowledge, you are mere sheep and pawn of every force and whim. Such a person walks around blindly judging and following every new theory and scoffing at every holy thing. What a sad, blind state.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
there is no peace if melchizedek is "in charge". he got stuck with an ancient and outdated philosophy for too long. made him and many others very sick but morons kept pushing it on him and others. similar to a Godless mafia. "control" (Godless0 at the expense of themselves and others.
deritpeehs 4 years ago
I find it interesting that the only way you would have ever heard of this name is through the scriptures. Yet you fail to look there to find out the mystery. In the Old Testament Melchizedek is mentioned twice in Genesis 14:18-20 and in Psalms 110:4. In the New Testament he is mentioned only in the Epistle to the Hebrews chapter seven. By studying these texts, what have you found out so far.
Isaac0711 4 years ago
Isaac666, you are STILL BLIND and REFUSE to SEE IT!
Did Abraham worship Maleek [Ultimate KING] of Zedeq?
If Yes,Why?
Abraham was GOD's Best Friend?Why?
ultraspirit 4 years ago
Ultra, the fact is you cannot unveil this meaning yet. It is not time for it to be revealed but you and I can try our best to make whatever we can out of it....it is difficult to understand God's ways though with our simple carnal minds...agreed?
Melchizedek = KING OF SALEM which means "KING OF RIGHTEOUSNESS" SALEM = Peace or "KING OF PEACE"
Isaac0711 4 years ago
COULD it be possible that the symbol of BREAD and WINE were a foreshadowing 2,000 years before Christ came to the cross for our sins and that the BREAD and WINE was a symbol of His death on the Cross?
Just as people look back on Christ's death on the Cross today; could this have been a way of Abraham looking ahead, on the other side of the mirror in anticipation of the remembrance of Jesus? Could Abraham have been the first to take of the COMMUNION?
Just a thought.
Isaac0711 4 years ago
Isaac666, It ain't OVER.
STAY TUNED....
ultraspirit 4 years ago
This Melchizedek has been a 'mysterious' character for a long time Ultra, you're right it is not over. I don't want to fight with you...but I know you are going to keep twisting and twisting it to fit it into your cult to make it fit into Islam. You don't use the original verses it was originally found in!!!!
Yeah, I'll stay tuned, but keep searching..I ENCOURAGE IT. Why don't you quote HEBREWS?
Isaac0711 4 years ago
Melchizedeik ... is not just a king and not just an angel.. King of justice/king of peace ...
The scriptures in the end times reveals the name of the trinity ?
We say in the name of father , son and holy spirit ? what are the names?
Those who call the name of the lord will be saved ? whats the name?
the truth is revealed in one part of the earth....
umeshj79 1 year ago
Melchizedeik ... is not just a king and not just an angel.. King of justice/king of peace ...
The scriptures in the end times reveals the name of the trinity ?
We say in the name of father , son and holy spirit ? what are the names?
Those who call the name of the lord will be saved ? whats the name?
the truth is revealed in one part of the earth....
umeshj79 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Melchizedeik ... is not just a king and not just an angel.. King of justice/king of peace ...
The scriptures in the end times reveals the name of the trinity ?
We say in the name of father , son and holy spirit ? what are the names?
Those who call the name of the lord will be saved ? whats the name?
the truth is revealed in one part of the earth.... by a person sent by god
umeshj79 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Melchizedeik ... is not just a king and not just an angel.. King of justice/king of peace ...
The scriptures in the end times reveals the name of the trinity ?
We say in the name of father , son and holy spirit ? what are the names?
Those who call the name of the lord will be saved ? whats the name?
the truth is revealed in one part of the earth.... by a person sent by god
umeshj79 1 year ago
الهجرة دار هادينا
حمل الاسلام لنا دينا
ورسول الله قائم فينا
ارسله الله الى الخليل ابينا
ملاك الصدق يحمينا
امينا
ultraspirit 4 years ago
Have you looked up the scriptures and how they say that the Old Testament Melchizedek is the King of Salem? Meaning....the New Testament KING OF JERUSALEM, JESUS CHRIST. Could have been a theophany or pre-incarnate JESUS CHRIST. There are many appearances of CHRIST in the Old Testament before he appeared in the New Testament.
Keep this in mind:
The OLD TESTAMENT is GOD CONCEALED
The NEW TESTAMENT is GOD REVEALED
Something to look into friend.
Isaac0711 4 years ago
Isaac0711,
Malek=KING, Malak=Angel, Maleek=Ultimate King [God.]
Zedeq=Truth.
Abraham met Malak Zedeq[Angel of Truth]
Abraham worshiped Maleek Zedeq , The Ultimate God of Truth, Allah.
ultraspirit 4 years ago
I agree...you left out the Hebrew equivalent:
Tzedek= Righteousness
So you are saying that God can become a man?
Isaac0711 4 years ago
Melchizedek appeared before Abraham in Genesis 14:18, "And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth BREAD and WINE: and he was the priest of the most high God."
Who broke the bread?
Matthew 26:26
"Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body."
Isaac0711 4 years ago
Matthew 26:27-29
"And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it; For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins."
"But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom."
Isaac0711 4 years ago
Isaac0711, there is NO limit to God's power. The Question is: Did Abraham Worship Maleek Tzedek? If yes Why? Why Mr. Christian? Ha...Ha...
ultraspirit 4 years ago
Ultraspirit, I agree..there is NO LIMIT TO GOD'S POWER. I simply asked you a question:
CAN GOD BECOME A MAN?
You say there is no limit to God's power...yet you cannot simply say YES or NO?
Simple question Ultra....waiting for your answer.
Isaac0711 4 years ago
@ultraspirit Well if you read the book of Enoch from the dead sea scrolls you will find that Melchizedek was born and became a fully developed man very quickly born of a dead woman and was taken up to heaven to be reserved for the last days, its amazing book. Dead sea scrolls revealed so much!
yourboyken 1 year ago
@ultraspirit And you think that Abraham spoke modern Hebrew, or arabic ? ... and you don't study it as a Northern Semitic word ? lol. ... riiiight. "King" is an abstract title, where "malak," is a concrete ancient word tied to landscape. It means "one of elevated status," as in a hill. It applied to rulers and ambassadors (ie, messengers and angels). the Tzedeq-Malak, can mean, a "righteous ruler." Note: he was a Kohen and a Ruler, but not God, nor an Angel.
KeyboardPacifist 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Isaac0711
"So you are saying that God can become a man?"
The other way around!
mistermateriel 1 year ago
@Isaac0711 What is also strange for me is that the word "tzedek" ("sedek") closelly correspondes to the bulgarian (slavic) word "sad" or "sed" (съд), what means "court". The word "court" is closelly related to the rights and "righteous" even in some various aspects - civil or religious. Hence съд goes to sedek ("tzedek").
balkhara 1 year ago
@Isaac0711 From other side, a councill member is called "zasedatel", derived from "sedya" (sitting). "Zasedatel" means a member who is in proces of any councill /jury/ discussion. So za-seda-tel correspondes to a jury member and so goes to sedeq /tzedek/, which is righteous.
balkhara 1 year ago
Hebrews is written of Melchizedek...
That he is mad like the Son of God...so Jesus could not be him in pre incarnate....
carmine76 4 years ago