Yeah, I am sure, but here's the deal. 40% of people drop out of online video in the first 10 seconds. Just because its video and its online you don't have the excuse of 'well, we did the best we could under the circumstances'. Online viewers don't know and don't care about your problems. Not to be harsh, but would The Guardian publish with typos and ink smears all over the page?
@Rosenblumtv I completely understand. I certainly wasn't offering it as an excuse... more that our reasoning was along the lines of 'yep, the audio could have been better but we'll go with this on this occasion.' There is certainly no-one thinking its video and its online so it will do.
Jeez, the first rule here is to take care of the technical stuff. The audio here is terrible (and the lighting not much better). If no one wants to watch it, all your work is for nothing. I am dumping out now, in fact.
Jeez, the first rule here is to take care of the technical stuff. The audio here is terrible (and the lighting not much better). If no one wants to watch it, all your work is for nothing. I am dumping out now, in fact.
Sorry @Rosenblumtv, we did have some troubles with the sound. But we figured that as Neal's contribution was still valuable some might appreciate having the opportunity to hear despite the poor quality sound.
THATS MY BOY!
huffy123 9 months ago
Yeah, I am sure, but here's the deal. 40% of people drop out of online video in the first 10 seconds. Just because its video and its online you don't have the excuse of 'well, we did the best we could under the circumstances'. Online viewers don't know and don't care about your problems. Not to be harsh, but would The Guardian publish with typos and ink smears all over the page?
Rosenblumtv 9 months ago
@Rosenblumtv I completely understand. I certainly wasn't offering it as an excuse... more that our reasoning was along the lines of 'yep, the audio could have been better but we'll go with this on this occasion.' There is certainly no-one thinking its video and its online so it will do.
bbccojovideo 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jeez, the first rule here is to take care of the technical stuff. The audio here is terrible (and the lighting not much better). If no one wants to watch it, all your work is for nothing. I am dumping out now, in fact.
Rosenblumtv 9 months ago
Jeez, the first rule here is to take care of the technical stuff. The audio here is terrible (and the lighting not much better). If no one wants to watch it, all your work is for nothing. I am dumping out now, in fact.
Rosenblumtv 9 months ago
Sorry @Rosenblumtv, we did have some troubles with the sound. But we figured that as Neal's contribution was still valuable some might appreciate having the opportunity to hear despite the poor quality sound.
bbccojovideo 9 months ago