Added: 5 years ago
From: 91camaroSS
Views: 26,054
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (81)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • that looks like a mercury grand marquis lol

  • @rubyspaceship1o1 the other car not the camaro of course lol.

  • @rubyspaceship1o1 was a maurader

  • who races a crown vic?

  • @quackmaster1447 Someone who may be interested in drug runs. lol

  • what time did u get

  • that,s not a 305 i can tell you that.

  • @joeduece1 It is an 305, the RS in NOT a 350, sorry to break that to you. Besides, if that was a 350, and it's barely beating a 281 I feel sorry for the owner...

  • @getoffmeluckycharms While i don't think this particular RS is a 350,the 350 could be had in an RS if it was ordered with the code B4C.Most of the B4C Camaro's were ordered for police duty,but some made it into the hands of the general public.Not all B4C's were 350 with automatic trannies however,some were 305's with 5 speed manual trannies,and those particular tpi 305's had a more aggressive cam and were actually a bit faster than Mustangs of the same vintage.

  • @derrdon Ahh you're right. The RS's were generally 305's, I forgot about that. It was the Z28's that were 350's. With these cars, it's all about the torque anyway lol

  • one fast camaro nice

  • FIREBIRDS and Camaros are the exact same cars!!! just with different trim/ground effects etc... the only time i thing the firebird looks better than a Camaro is the 4th generation (they looked sexy) :)

  • @38snipshow loool your giving out GM secrets theyll go outa business if you tell people. 4th gen firebirds are much much nicer though IDk wtf they were thinking with the body design on Camaro during those years they turned it into a boat.

  • @feeblemind yea i agree...like i don't think they're butt ugly but i just like the body styling of the firebird in those years. love them all though

  • I have one of these for sale

  • Stock?

  • what was the 1/4 mile time?

  • @xxfrijolxx i think it said to be continued.....

  • nice cherry camaro ya got there. guess you can out run the cops...LoL, J/K

  • wow that was a little slow

  • did you expect a probably mostly stock if not all stock thirdgen to run 13's?

  • whats a camaro??

    hahahahahaaa jk

  • The TPI was available in either the L98 or the LB9 (305). The 'Vette got alum. heads. The F-bodies did not.

    The LT-1 in the 1970 Camaro was the first "LT-1". The newer LT1 was not the same block. Same pistons and crank design, but a Gen 2 had reverse flow cooling. The blocks and heads are not interchangeable. The LT1 in the B-body cars got iron heads. Only the Vette and the F-bodies got alum. heads. The LS engines are completely different all together. Nothing like the Gen 1 and Gen 2 blocks.

  • Ok, all the TPI and LT1 engines used the same internals. LT1 used aluminum head with different combustion chambers, different induction and computer system. The reason people compare the 2 is because they use the SAME DAMN ENGINE. Difference is state of tune. Not sure who said it, but the L98 made 245hp and *340* ft/lbs torque. LT1's peak torque was lower to facilitate higher RPM breathing. Reason the T-5 was never used with the 350 was because T-5 was rated at 300 ft/lbs, would've been shredded

  • Just my 2 cents so here it is, Yes there was a 350 called the lt1 in 1970, but its no relation to the mordern one just a name like ls6(1970 454 the new 6.0l v-8). For the tpi and 90's lt1s there is a difference. Both share the same block, pistons and all that crap. corvette has a true dual exhaust system , bigger heads , and its a 4bolt main instead of a 2bolt. That's really the only difference. The corvette makes more power cause it can breathe better basically.

  • corvette is NOT A CAMARO QUITE COMPARING THE TWO! I BET I CAN MAKE MY CAMARO JUST AS BADASS AS THE VETTE WITH THE SAME AMOUNT OF MONEY AND ILL STILL HAVE FOUR SEATS! HAHA DO SOME RESEARCH! GT'S R JUST BREAKFAST WHERS LUNCH AND DINNER?

  • i like the camaro. they come a dime a dozen, easy to work on, and can be made as fast as a vette. thats why its called the poormans vette. they rock.

  • @1975elcid too bad the 3100 V6's and 305s were piss poor choices for powerplants in them they could have at least made the V^ a 3800 off the buick line and used a better cam in the 305s to give them something, otherwise the cars just a looker with no balls ( I would know I have one lol)

  • @1975elcid i love camaros check mine out done so much more to but its a bitch working underneath without lift i did spark plugss =p

  • @1975elcid

    camaro = poor mans vette

    firebird = poor(er) mans camaro lol

    and still, the firebird has even as much performance as the camaro.

  • @jphilpott0426 dude the firebird has always been better than the camaro....

  • @mastaajbomb well not entirely true. im just repeating what i have heard though. im not bagging on birds at all. the birds a maros are basically the exact same car, just with a different appearence. it just comes down to what you prefer in looks. i personally like camaros just a little bit more.

  • @jphilpott0426 same damn car lol, firebird looks nicer on the inside tho, i got a 92 bird , but i rly like 3rd gen camaros look from the outside, they are fuking beautiful cars for the era they were built. Look at the foxbody mustang, the first models were fucking ugly.

  • @cubano1389 yeah. they really are the same cars. I KNOW! they were ugly as hellll. never would i want one of those rustangs lol

  • haha your both stupid and its f ing funny! do some research instead of looking stupid! you both dont kno what your talking about! but one of you makes sense! lets see if we can figure out who...... do some research first appearence means nothing internals everything! why do people mix corvette with camaro? nothing but the block and intake are the same! not even the tune! where did ls1 come into this? it has nothing to do with the lsx series motors! LO3 VERSE L98? YEA RITE NOT EVEN CLOSE!

  • what was your time? and any mods?

  • never will a 305 throttle body beat a5.0 mustang not even with 4.10 gears

  • Idk 4:10's would be HUGE for an L03, i used to have one, now i have a Vortec 350, cammed with and intake in my IROC. I eat GT's all day long.

  • what an average 1/4 mile time for an early 90's RS? friend just picked on up and im pretty sure i can outrun him in my 97 GTP but just double checkin.

  • 15.7-16.4 usally on a stock automatic and the 5 speed cars would run 3 tenths faster usally. this is usally the case on tbi cars. tuned port 305's ran low 15's high 14's and the 350 tuned port ran mid 14's

  • I have an 85 Camaro with a 350 and 4speed auto. I have a performance cam and a bigger carburator. It has a 2:73 gear and I get 14:40 on the 1/4 mile. I could trim that down to low 13s easily by shanging the gear ratio.

  • OK...to clear things up..GM put in alot of different engines in the 82-92 years. mostly the 305, but in many different setups.Also the 350 TPI. This one is the 305 L03, same as my car. It's the lowest output V8 they put in these cars. 170 HP, 255 tourqe. The 5.0 fox mustang does beat this, but that isnt really fair, this is the RS version.

  • They also put the lg4 155hp 305 in these too. And the Mustang 5.0 5-speed cars beat the 350tpi cars also.

  • the ONLY reason that piece of crap with a blue oval on it beats the 305 TBI is because of the gearing, I switched mine out for a 4:10 and threw a hurst ratchet shifter on and I smoke fox bodies all day. Total cost of mods: about $100 and 3 or 4 hours.

  • 350's beat the foxbodies. That is why they even started to put the vette motor in the maro.

  • It wasn't the Vette's motor, it was a copy with alot less hp... idk why ppl say its the Vette's motor cause ITS NOT.

  • the 350 tpi is the vette motor in the mid to late 80's. its the same thing, nothing different. maybe the cam specs and thats all. it IS a vette engine. they never mounted a 5 speed with the 350 for 2 possibilities, 1 being insurance costs. the second being, they couldnt have the camaro being near as fast as the corvette. if you notice, even the newer vetts only run mid to low 13's. you wanna know why?! becuase its a lt1. yep. lt1. with a 6 speed, the camaro's can hang. know your facts.

  • WOW! ok maybe you should learn your facts... ONE the ONLY similarity between the Vette TPI 350 and the Camaro 350 TPI is the TPI unit itself, and exterior appearance. Otherwiase just about everything is different.. also notice how one makes alot more power than ther other.. and the ACTUAL reason the 5 spd wasn't put behind the 350 was b/c it is a shit tranny,T-5's blow out under those torque numbers....

  • oh NO, still not done. if you pulled the numbers from a 94 corvette, whats that come back as?...lt1. that right there tells you something,correct? dont get me started on the lsx engine. thats a whole new breed along with the ls series. and what hp and tq did the l98 put down? around 245 and what 260? lt1's put down 275 with alum. heads. 6 speed, GM t56, corvettes lt1, put down near the same. with a GM t56. and the actual reason a t-5 was never used, was never really discussed. do some reserch

  • your an idiot and don't know shit, of course i know they are the same BLOCK! but the internals are different and diff hp numbers duh. so if you have a firebird and say it has a vette engine your dead wrong, cause the vette motor has more power. and the first LT1 came out in 1992 dumbass, not 1970. similar block BUT Lt1 and LS1 etc. don't stand for blocks its majorly the difference in the induction system. wow you make domestic lovers look fuckin stupid...

  • And if you didn't know newer vettes run 11's dumbass. and newer vetts use the LS1 and LS6's and the LSX series blocks. its NOT IN ANYWAY an Lt1. Learn the ACTUAL facts.... You shouldn't even own a Camaro if you seriously believe the garbage you just posted....

  • ok, because, and only because, you filling these peoples heads with well, lets call it garbage, if your goin to say that the ls1's they put in camaro's arent ls1's. then lt1's they put in camaro's and corvettes. arent lt1's. and by newer, i meant to around 94-95 ish. they werent lt1's? if you recall, they also put lt1's in early 70 camaros, tell me that isnt an lt1. if you pulled up the numbers off the block from a 1989 corvette, whats it come back as? ....L98... a camaro(firebird) engine.

  • anyways. they indeed, put an lt1 in earlier cars. no, it wasnt fuel injected. no its not an aluminum headed 346 cubic inch like the (ls1) but it indeed is an lt1..... what internals are different? did 1 have a 3.48 stroke with 4 inch bore? the other have a 3.00 stroke with 4 inch bore (327) tell me i dont know my shit. fuck you. haha. wait, what are we fighting about? all we are doin is proving both ourselves wrong. we both love domestic, lets jus leave it at that

  • yes we love domestic, but an LT1 is not an Lt1 without the injection system...and that earlier motor is not an lt1... its just a basic 350 small block with aluminum heads...

  • most Z28s had the same motor as the RS in the 80s dude. And Fox Body 5.0's are faster than 3rd gens unless its a 350 TPI (And Im a chevy guy).

  • Even with the 350 TPI they barely put out any power, gotta love how cheap and easy it is to modify a 302 or a sbc 350.

  • not with a simple gear replacement, my 305 TBI RS kills fox bodies and it's got no other mods but a 4:10. I think it might have been a 2.73 that I took out, I remember is was huge 1st gear was worthless.

  • yeah dats why 5.0 dominated 80's and 90's....shut up dumn beatch. mustangs are fukin gay. 2 bad dis is an RS. a Z28 can beat a 5.0 dumbass

  • werent most camaros in the 80's and 90's 5.0?

  • learn to spell,,, ebonics???

  • when you say 5.0 i guess you mean mustang and in that case, only the 5.7 irocs could beat the 5.0 stangs..

  • In the early 80's there was a high output carburated 305 called the L69 (it was basically an LG-4 305 with the wick turned up a bit) and it could beat some 5.0 stangs.

  • lol you mean the one with 190hp..

  • mid 15's- is that auto?

  • haha crown vicotria garbage got its ass beat XD

  • This is why the 5.0 dominated the 80's and early 90's.

  • hahaha it ran high 15s or low 16s it started at 6 seconds an the lights came on at 22 seconds.

  • damn ats great, i hate crown vics but apparently he passed u towards the end, im not 100 % sure tho..ur car is nice

  • the person driveing that other white care is my bother elroy

  • all stock?

  • what time did it run? i have a 91 RS too

  • good to know i can outrun a cop car lol

  • l0l

  • @mazdaman45 yeah but that aint got the cop kit motor. cops have 50 grand plus in upgrades. that was prolly stock :/

  • @lolmbclol your fucking retarded you think the city/state puts 50 grand in cop cars get the fuck outa here you ignorant fuck

  • @treyofour they dont but some guy once showed up to a car show in a fox body mustang, 85 5.0 cammer, suspension redon put a 5 spd tranny on her, and it was his REGISTERED police interceptor he got paperwork and municipal plates for it man, thats one cop car I do NOT want running me down

  • @ITS4390 the cop car cams make more torque less horsepower for reliability and lower rear axle you can do that with yours the stock 5.0 stangs had 200hp

  • @lolmbclol my dad saw a bunch of cop cars at a dealership getting cop shit put on, and they said they dont sup up the motor at all, completely stock crown victorian motors is all they go with!

  • @mazdaman45 LOOOL unf for everyone who agrees with this cop cars arnt stock..nowhere near...they are suped up because they have to catch fast cars.

  • @feeblemind cop cars aren't stock but nothing is done to make them faster. they just give them a bigger altenator for the electronics and lights and they give them better brakes and suspension to handle better. that's all thats in a police package...

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more