Googleeingabe: "Neues zur Klimalüge – News of climate lies"
und auch
Googleeingabe: "Klimalügner IPCC verabschiedet sich von seinen Lügen"
Wie schön, dass Leute wie Latif, Schellnhuber, Rahmstorf, Lesch usw. immer so schön im Fernsehen auftraten. Da weiß man doch wenigstens WEN man mit Strafanzeigen und Schadenersatzklagen zu überziehen hat!
Das Lügeninstitut IPCC verabschiedet sich von seinen pseudo-wissenschaftlichen Lügen!
Googleeingabe: "IPCC scientists test the Exit doors"
Googleeingabe: "Klimalügner IPCC am Ende"
Wie schön, dass Leute wie Latif, Schellnhuber, Rahmstorf und Lesch immer so schön im Fernsehen auftraten. Da weiß man wenigstens WEN man mit Strafanzeigen und Schadenersatzklagen zu überziehen hat!
Of course that was all during the warmest year on record. (tied with 2005)Of course record snowfalls actually are in line with global warming. It's still cold enough to snow and there's more moisture in the air.
The scientist of course never predicted 30 years of cooling even though he said natural variation could cause periods of cooling. His whole graph shows warming and lots of it.
The globe are on the way to global cooling, it will gradually cool till around 2035, then we will have a little ice age, all proved and peer reviewed by scientist in the weather field. Sometime in the near future these crooks must admit their scam went wrong, but they are getting away with it, and that's wrong.
31,000 scientists reject 'global warming' agenda 'Mr. Gore's movie has claims no informed expert endorses'
More than 31,000 scientists across the U.S. – including more than 9,000 Ph.D.s in fields such as atmospheric science, climatology, Earth science, environment and dozens of other specialties – have signed a petition rejecting "global warming," the assumption that the human production of greenhouse gases is damaging Earth's climate.
"There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate," the petition states. "Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth."
The NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) informs us that NCDC’s rate of increase of U.S. lower 48 temperature, from the last decade of the 19th century to 2006 of 0.69oC/century, is based on an over-selection of stations with urban locations. The rate of increase for rural 48 locations, based on (raw) as- measured values, is small (if not, in effect, zero) at 0.11 oC/century. This low value does not support anthropogenic warming in the U.S.
The NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) informs us that NCDC’s rate of increase of U.S. lower 48 temperature, from the last decade of the 19th century to 2006 of 0.69oC/century, is based on an over-selection of stations with urban locations. The rate of increase for rural 48 locations, based on (raw) as- measured values, is small (if not, in effect, zero) at 0.11 oC/century. This low value does not support anthropogenic warming in the U.S.
Is it really warming? Don't listen to the "experts". Go straight to the data itself. If you would like to explore the data underpinning the cooling trend for yourselves, I've made three short videos to guide you through:
@cristop5 Yes but NONE are Peer-Reviewed . Bing SCIENCESKEPTICAL MWP , if you want more than 45 studies ( Peer Review ) that show the planet is COOLER today than before oil use.
@camcheck Of course my videos on how to access global temperature databases aren't peer reviewed! How do you peer review data? My videos simply allow you to explore for yourself the hypothesis that the earth is cooling.
The MWP is a different question. In 2006 the National Research Council reviewed global temperatures over the last 2000 years. The review included most of the studies spun by Scienceskeptical. Google "Surface Temperature Reconstructions for the Last 2,000 Years".
In 30 years? So why did it happen 30 years ago since global warming et seq. has been brought on by carbon? When deluded green people quote such dated events, they completely ignore the fact of reference points.
Don't listen to the "experts". Go straight to the data itself. If you would like to explore the data underpinning the cooling trend for yourselves, I've made three short videos to guide you through:
He does not say the AGW is untrue just that it may be overridden for a whil eby a temporary cooling. It also shows he was wrong - the last year has been the hottest consequative12-month period on record by a long way (including the snowy winter).
PS snow does not = cold, snow = precipitation when the temperature is near or below 0C (this most often occurs in a period technically known as "winter", perhaps you have heard of it! If not Google it). AWG predicts more & larger precipitation events
it is like guy who was an athiest end up believing God when he gets old. Is it becuase he get wiser or got delusioned or his thinking power got weaker? you analyse it!!
The Winter 2009-10 was made by HAARP. In Greenland they´ve got 14 Degrees celsius in Jnauary, Vancouver nearly the same. Where most of the people are living it was cold, they need more energy-- this is it--make money by HAARP technologie!
This interpretation has been stated as incorrect in an interview with Latif, after being asked whether he was a climate sceptic, he explained that "If my name was not Mojib Latif, my name would be global warming. So I really believe in Global Warming. Okay. However, you know, we have to accept that there are these natural fluctuations, and therefore, the temperature may not show additional warming temporarily."
They said the same thing in the 70s when I was growing up.. then in the late 80s they changed thier minds and said we were warming and it was all OUR fault.. now, it's back to cooling.. When will they just admit that THEY DON'T KNOW?
This is one "melodic" video. =p
blaircolon36 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Übrigens!
Googleeingabe: "Neues zur Klimalüge – News of climate lies"
und auch
Googleeingabe: "Klimalügner IPCC verabschiedet sich von seinen Lügen"
Wie schön, dass Leute wie Latif, Schellnhuber, Rahmstorf, Lesch usw. immer so schön im Fernsehen auftraten. Da weiß man doch wenigstens WEN man mit Strafanzeigen und Schadenersatzklagen zu überziehen hat!
MultiNewMedia 1 month ago
This video is popular on Portau
ohnniehickm24j 1 month ago
and produce more co2 in order to keep the planet away from cooling
NoMoney25 2 months ago
in order to save the planet we must drive more cars and use more oil
NoMoney25 2 months ago
Laugh Out Loud
NoMoney25 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"hamnose: Oh so it's actually getting cooler?"
Yes.
"The thermometers have been lying all along"
No.
Only the climate-fraudsters are lying.
Please take a look at "Donna Laframboise" here at Youtube.
SHE tell the truth.
MultiNewMedia 2 months ago
Comment removed
MultiNewMedia 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Das Lügeninstitut IPCC verabschiedet sich von seinen pseudo-wissenschaftlichen Lügen!
Googleeingabe: "IPCC scientists test the Exit doors"
Googleeingabe: "Klimalügner IPCC am Ende"
Wie schön, dass Leute wie Latif, Schellnhuber, Rahmstorf und Lesch immer so schön im Fernsehen auftraten. Da weiß man wenigstens WEN man mit Strafanzeigen und Schadenersatzklagen zu überziehen hat!
MultiNewMedia 3 months ago
Of course that was all during the warmest year on record. (tied with 2005)Of course record snowfalls actually are in line with global warming. It's still cold enough to snow and there's more moisture in the air.
The scientist of course never predicted 30 years of cooling even though he said natural variation could cause periods of cooling. His whole graph shows warming and lots of it.
rugbyguy59 5 months ago
The globe are on the way to global cooling, it will gradually cool till around 2035, then we will have a little ice age, all proved and peer reviewed by scientist in the weather field. Sometime in the near future these crooks must admit their scam went wrong, but they are getting away with it, and that's wrong.
kennjohnsen 5 months ago
Please watch my several videos of 2011 latest scientific knowledge,go to my channel watch- 6th International Conference on Climate Change
2wheels88 6 months ago
31,000 scientists reject 'global warming' agenda 'Mr. Gore's movie has claims no informed expert endorses'
More than 31,000 scientists across the U.S. – including more than 9,000 Ph.D.s in fields such as atmospheric science, climatology, Earth science, environment and dozens of other specialties – have signed a petition rejecting "global warming," the assumption that the human production of greenhouse gases is damaging Earth's climate.
2wheels88 6 months ago
"There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate," the petition states. "Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth."
2wheels88 6 months ago
Snow and freezing weather in NH Winter, how surprising! Does that mean GLOBAL cooling - no!
tiny. cc slash NoaaSOCGA2011JanR
pseudotruth 8 months ago
Yeah, all made up
watch?v=khikoh3sJg8
TheMrSirCharles 9 months ago
This video is garbage. If you want to know what Mojib Latif really thinks then watch this.
watch?v=khikoh3sJg8
brochan11 1 year ago
I hiccup of cooling in a warming cycle?? hheehor a hiccup of warming in the cooling cycle? Global warmists are spin doctors hehhe
OtagoMark 1 year ago
The NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) informs us that NCDC’s rate of increase of U.S. lower 48 temperature, from the last decade of the 19th century to 2006 of 0.69oC/century, is based on an over-selection of stations with urban locations. The rate of increase for rural 48 locations, based on (raw) as- measured values, is small (if not, in effect, zero) at 0.11 oC/century. This low value does not support anthropogenic warming in the U.S.
wayne487msc 1 year ago
The NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) informs us that NCDC’s rate of increase of U.S. lower 48 temperature, from the last decade of the 19th century to 2006 of 0.69oC/century, is based on an over-selection of stations with urban locations. The rate of increase for rural 48 locations, based on (raw) as- measured values, is small (if not, in effect, zero) at 0.11 oC/century. This low value does not support anthropogenic warming in the U.S.
wayne487msc 1 year ago
Is it really warming? Don't listen to the "experts". Go straight to the data itself. If you would like to explore the data underpinning the cooling trend for yourselves, I've made three short videos to guide you through:
1. CRU database watch?v=OS44qirIOcU
2. NASA database watch?v=8Q97zVngPGU
3. UAH satellite data watch?v=I3q3zs0EVDU
cristop5 1 year ago
@cristop5 Yes but NONE are Peer-Reviewed . Bing SCIENCESKEPTICAL MWP , if you want more than 45 studies ( Peer Review ) that show the planet is COOLER today than before oil use.
camcheck 11 months ago
@camcheck Of course my videos on how to access global temperature databases aren't peer reviewed! How do you peer review data? My videos simply allow you to explore for yourself the hypothesis that the earth is cooling.
The MWP is a different question. In 2006 the National Research Council reviewed global temperatures over the last 2000 years. The review included most of the studies spun by Scienceskeptical. Google "Surface Temperature Reconstructions for the Last 2,000 Years".
cristop5 11 months ago
In 30 years? So why did it happen 30 years ago since global warming et seq. has been brought on by carbon? When deluded green people quote such dated events, they completely ignore the fact of reference points.
jwquinlan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Don't listen to the "experts". Go straight to the data itself. If you would like to explore the data underpinning the cooling trend for yourselves, I've made three short videos to guide you through:
1. CRU database watch?v=OS44qirIOcU
2. NASA database watch?v=8Q97zVngPGU
3. UAH satellite data watch?v=I3q3zs0EVDU
cristop5 1 year ago
Do not forget volcanoes and lack of sun spots . its going to be another cold winter.
david222444 1 year ago
LOL so weve basically got 30 years to sort out our emissions?!
xXYouTubbiZz 1 year ago
He does not say the AGW is untrue just that it may be overridden for a whil eby a temporary cooling. It also shows he was wrong - the last year has been the hottest consequative12-month period on record by a long way (including the snowy winter).
PS snow does not = cold, snow = precipitation when the temperature is near or below 0C (this most often occurs in a period technically known as "winter", perhaps you have heard of it! If not Google it). AWG predicts more & larger precipitation events
drkstrong 1 year ago
it is like guy who was an athiest end up believing God when he gets old. Is it becuase he get wiser or got delusioned or his thinking power got weaker? you analyse it!!
diasporans 1 year ago
Check out Joe Bastardi from Accuweather. He's been bang on most of the time. Missed the odd one. But he's not on Al Gore's payroll.
He's not promoting either side so the media only gives him the occasional blurb.
patioperson 1 year ago
Good one. More like these as fed up with the lies.
gisellewilding 1 year ago
The Winter 2009-10 was made by HAARP. In Greenland they´ve got 14 Degrees celsius in Jnauary, Vancouver nearly the same. Where most of the people are living it was cold, they need more energy-- this is it--make money by HAARP technologie!
conrebbi 1 year ago
@conrebbi How do you know HAARP can do that?
psilocyberspaceman 1 year ago
@psilocyberspaceman search for: owening the weather in 2025!
Tamcy J. House (Colonel) present at 1996 the whole programm -
conrebbi 1 year ago
@conrebbi No good results came out of that, and none that gave any evidence for HAARP being able to modify the weather.
psilocyberspaceman 1 year ago
shes gona freeze over! beter get ready folks!, im moving to mexico:)
dillon822 1 year ago
This interpretation has been stated as incorrect in an interview with Latif, after being asked whether he was a climate sceptic, he explained that "If my name was not Mojib Latif, my name would be global warming. So I really believe in Global Warming. Okay. However, you know, we have to accept that there are these natural fluctuations, and therefore, the temperature may not show additional warming temporarily."
Epoxynous 1 year ago
Opening the fridge door probably overcomes man-made contributions.
Srekwah 1 year ago
They said the same thing in the 70s when I was growing up.. then in the late 80s they changed thier minds and said we were warming and it was all OUR fault.. now, it's back to cooling.. When will they just admit that THEY DON'T KNOW?
moonlitesonata2 1 year ago 2
Trying to distance himself from the weather hoax.
puhiawa 1 year ago 9
It seems afterall that nature itself doesn't listen to human made committees about what it should do...lol
todaybiz1 1 year ago 11
3decades is enough for me to live... kthxbai
Kyoshimaro123 1 year ago 2
Great Post thanx
checkThrice 1 year ago 2