@GunsOfThePhoenix Thats the most stupid thing ive ever heard.... When they crash it at lower speeds its easier tto see what or where they need to improve for example, dont be such a retard.
@EthanJM People don't get it. Cars are required to be crash tested to meet certain safety and crash laws. Otherwise it is not street legal. The reason why the Porsche 959 was "illegal" in the US was because Porsche refused the crash test an "US spec" version.
@Skyline123159 Well, it is stupid. Honestly, as long as cars are not going to directly harm other people for some unsafe reason, it should be up to the driver of the car how safe or unsafe the car they are willing to drive is. Especially when you take supercars into account, they are engineering marvels, they are best at what they were made for, and that is speed. They are speed machines, not baby tanks.
Actually, this test was done at 95mph, proving irrefutably that the Maclaren F1 is, in fact, the safest car in the world. Didn't expect that, did you?
I read somewhere that the new McLaren, the MP4 12C, had to do three crash tests, and that the carbon tub was so strong they ended up using the same one for all three.
All cars have to undergo these tests no matter how expensive or exotic!! The amazing thing with the strength of the F1 is that the windshield never even broke
@sohcsarewicked maybe you should have done some research and seen that honda would have put some turbo charged v6 with fatty pipes, effectively killing the mclaren legendary stature
This isn't neccessarily an "official" test, it could of been park of development. The F1 was designed to be capable of passing and/or exceeding the crash test requirements of a then (mid-90's) Formula 1 car, an ncap test is nothing when compared to that. I remember reading somewhere (i think it was in autocar magazine) that the F1 came away from the 30mph head-on test with barely a cracked bumper, was still driveable, and the tub was undamaged. It's price was £640000.
NO TEST DUMMY? NO AIRBAG? This test is basically useless without a $50,000 test dummy wired with sensors and impact data. This car doesnt even appear to have seats or an interior. Whats that on the dash? Cardboard and plastic bags covering those big holes on the right and left of the car? There should be a dashboard there. I DOUBT this car even has an ENGINE in it. Again, this test is useless without a fully built car AND a test dummy.
Any new car MUST pass certain crash standards. This test in fact PROVED it was a lot safer than any other supercar back then. The carbon fibre monocoque was incredibly solid and strong.
@jebacjutube It wasn't a production car, this specific car was built before they started the production for these cars. It's like a test mule, but for safety. Plus, its just a car, regardless of how good or rare it is. Damn, people are lost without material goods....
@Yoaltecuhtli Yes, but Renault has manufactured more car models than Volvo, so what you need to do, is to compare average rating. Volvo = 4,6 and Renault =4,4.
@ChevyZ71djd You mean the one where the dummy smacks its face on the steering wheel?:P I just thought it was an odd example since there are loads of other cars that are so much more safe haha.
Considering the owners of a F1 are going to drive it to insane speeds I think they'd be happy knowing they sit in a car which won't desintigrate into a thousand pieces if they crash with it. Fact is one BMW Company Exective crashed one doing over330km/h on the German Autobahn. He was fine. A testimony to the safety of the car.
And Volvo doesn't make the safest cars. That's something their commercials have brainwashed people into thinking. Some years back several beat them in crash
@Mazotheman WELL I THINK ANYBODY WHO CAN AFFORD SUCH A CAR HAS THE RIGHT TO BE CONCEARNED ABOUT THIS CAR'S SAFETY..(THINK ALSO THAT THIS CAR HAS MUCH GREATER ACCELERATION AND TOP SPEED THAN A VOLVO..)AND IT'S INCREDIBLY SAFE AS YOU WATCHED...THE GUY WHO CAN AFFORD A VOLVO WILL CONCEARN ABOUT VOLVO'S SAFETY.SO BOTH HAVE THE RIGHT TO WORRY ABOUT THEIR CAR'S SAFETY..
They say, the designer of the Mclaren F1 was so possitive of how well the F1 would cope in a head on collision, he wanted to sit in the drivers seat during the collison, but Mira/EuroNCAP wouldn't let him, for Health and Safety reasons. He was right about the outcome.
the only thing with carbon fiber it would be like coming to a dead stop at what ever mpg you are traveling, the same as hitting a tree, i cant see it absorbing much of the impact
Thats actually true, but that is also why they design the carbon fiber and other parts to shatter and splinter away. Since it doesn't crumple up like sheet metal, the shattering and splintering dissipates the energy of the crash. If you look at an F1 or Indy car crash you'll see that they look like they burst into a million pieces; its because thats what they're designed to do... all of those pieces flying off pull energy out of the crash and protect the driver.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Now you would need to worry about carbon fiber parts flying thru the windshield and impelling the driver, I would rather it bent into the impact, BTW is'nt this test on a carbon fiber body in which case the parts seemed to bend. I didnt think carbon fiber shattered, I have yet to see any carbon fiber brake let alone shatter.
RIght I guess the flying shards are a problem, but I think that impact trauma is a bigger concern since even in a crash you're still inside the car and protected. I dont think the shards would have enough individual energy to penetrate the windshield.
As for this test, it doesn't look to be very high speed, which probably has something to do with it. But watch some high speed crashes of race cars and you'll see. Carbon fiber is very strong but when it finally breaks it does so very violently.
What are you talking about? Everyone knows its slow motion. When I say that it's not a high speed test, I mean over 100mph or so, which is usually what you see in F1 or Indy crashes when they break apart.
Also, you should learn proper grammar before you call people 'dumbasses'.
Weight and mass matter in a car crash, so it was the real thing. It's possible that they used ballast as a substitute for the expensive innards, though.
With most modern hyper cars they can work out roughly how well they're gonna perform in a crash, so things like the FXX will be MOSTLY safe. This may well be the saddest video ive seen :(
It was the 1992 Prototype-Pre release. I would have tested it at well to see how good the car holds up to a fronal impact. And then when its done i would replace the bent frame and rebuild it.
OMG!!
sas1whus214nylasd 2 weeks ago
NOOOOOOOOOOOO!
GEREX94 1 month ago
Apparently it still drove after this.
postie2003 2 months ago
Why crash test it? If you crash at 240 mph, you won't survive anyways.
GunsOfThePhoenix 4 months ago
@GunsOfThePhoenix Thats the most stupid thing ive ever heard.... When they crash it at lower speeds its easier tto see what or where they need to improve for example, dont be such a retard.
Gurksallad10 4 months ago
Mr bean crash his baby again
pawel1818 5 months ago
Why was this car even crash tested in the first place?
EthanJM 5 months ago
@EthanJM People don't get it. Cars are required to be crash tested to meet certain safety and crash laws. Otherwise it is not street legal. The reason why the Porsche 959 was "illegal" in the US was because Porsche refused the crash test an "US spec" version.
Skyline123159 5 months ago
@Skyline123159 Well, it is stupid. Honestly, as long as cars are not going to directly harm other people for some unsafe reason, it should be up to the driver of the car how safe or unsafe the car they are willing to drive is. Especially when you take supercars into account, they are engineering marvels, they are best at what they were made for, and that is speed. They are speed machines, not baby tanks.
EthanJM 5 months ago
Held up surprisingly well...
Driiven 6 months ago
They should make one where its going 110mph and hits the wall. 35mph weak.
pvgomer 6 months ago
According to the book it was still perfectly drivable, only illegal as the headlights had popped out.
strachanfloyd 6 months ago
you shud have gave it to me >:(
xxxn7zxxx 7 months ago
It looks safe!
sonyviva308 7 months ago
A sad day...
WoahSalmo 7 months ago
My eyes..
LPDeddej 7 months ago
bye bye $3.000.000 :'(
MaistroDavid 8 months ago
I almolst wanna cry
Dcarnys 8 months ago
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!
bidong 8 months ago
Actually, this test was done at 95mph, proving irrefutably that the Maclaren F1 is, in fact, the safest car in the world. Didn't expect that, did you?
rawhemi 9 months ago
speed??
Proton94 9 months ago
Try this at 100 mph !
kimi450 10 months ago
even crashed its still probably worth more than my house
Hitsulikeapunch 10 months ago
This test was at the standard 40mph. It is said that this is the only car which was able to drive away after the test was over!
sithering 10 months ago
i would personally like to crash test that car for you knowing that i got to sit in one :P
wahwahpedalmaster 11 months ago
I read somewhere that the new McLaren, the MP4 12C, had to do three crash tests, and that the carbon tub was so strong they ended up using the same one for all three.
jamesash7 11 months ago
give me the engine ill trade my girlfriend for that engine
JohnTroy1425 1 year ago
@JohnTroy1425 A girlfriend? Hell I'd give up a testicle for that! lol
rextuner03 11 months ago
made me cry :(
acetman1 1 year ago
if i have this car and crash i dont wana live anymore!! :(
Stratos20 1 year ago
There goes 1 of the 100 McLarens produced :(
EricKZhang 1 year ago 23
@EricKZhang I think it's just a prototype man, they aren't THAT heartless to put such a godly machine to waste =D
AceHalford 7 months ago 3
@AceHalford thast richt it is prototype p#3 out of 5
kneiterleip 6 months ago
@EricKZhang and another 2 from Mr.Bean:(
ColinMcraefan1 5 months ago
@EricKZhang this is probably not one of the 100, and probably is only a dummy shell with fake parts being powered along to crash
CarKid14 3 months ago
Rolf i survived
hit the break man !!
MrDerxX 1 year ago
Rolf i survived
MrDerxX 1 year ago
The text says this is the only car ever that could drive after the test. :)
Iceeeen 1 year ago 3
@Iceeeen Well, Thats cause the engine is in the back.
MetalSanke 8 months ago
All cars have to undergo these tests no matter how expensive or exotic!! The amazing thing with the strength of the F1 is that the windshield never even broke
rallycorsa1600 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Europeans benz bmw Porche Ferrari = trash
americans ford fm = trash
koreans hyundai = trash
chinese = plastic trash
Toyota is real samurai soul technology car
pride of japan!
worldpeace80 1 year ago
Fuck what a waste of good McLaren. They should've given it to me instead of just crash it >_>
Kakabeblen 1 year ago
:'( NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
I could've had that instead of ruining it :'(
aklsjdalksjdasd.
BucketheadWraith 1 year ago
Why are people getting upset? Obviously, that's not a complete F1.
Gatlin691 1 year ago
whats the fucking point in this?
DontHaveUsername1997 1 year ago
@DontHaveUsername1997 It's just fun watching car's worth more than we will ever have being crashed.
willettshardcore2007 1 year ago
the dash board didnt even quiver
vikkiandbradley07 1 year ago
no airbag? :D
einstein69tr 1 year ago
@einstein69tr TVR's have never had airbags
RobAnderson0 1 year ago
what a waste
shagy2k5 1 year ago
wow that was gooing like 20 miles an hour lol
ChevyZ71djd 1 year ago
not bad i think it did good for wat it is
wakeoblivion 1 year ago
siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TheCarlos599 1 year ago
crashing a 1,000 Used Honda civics = Crashing 1 mclaren f1
MldnightCIub 1 year ago 2
Was rebuilt and sold correct?
EJ25RUN 1 year ago
@EJ25RUN
was driven off and repaired
this car actually can be driven after it crashed test at 50mph.
look, the wheel arches are even intact!
ASSHOLELA 1 year ago
love4wheels [dot] com if you like cars, this is THE forum!!
Love4Wheels 1 year ago
they only crashed it at 30mph ish, what person that drives an f1 is going to crash at 30mph? they may crash but it wont be anywhere near 30mph
gumby1008 1 year ago
This car would have been a lot cooler if Honda built the motor
sohcsarewicked 1 year ago
@sohcsarewicked LOL! oh you were serious....
DBDMotorsports 1 year ago
@DBDMotorsports well maybe you should do some research smartie pants because they asked Honda to build the motor first.
sohcsarewicked 1 year ago
@sohcsarewicked maybe you should have done some research and seen that honda would have put some turbo charged v6 with fatty pipes, effectively killing the mclaren legendary stature
DBDMotorsports 1 year ago
No what the hell you should of gave that to me =(
afshin3 1 year ago
They could have hired a pchycic to declare if the car was safe!
ViperSRTnACR 1 year ago
@ViperSRTnACR lmao
pottersi 1 year ago
This video is dedicated to Rowan Atkinson
MDIVISIONRULES 1 year ago
i dunno why everyone is bitching and getting upset, its a NCT crash test it has to be done to see how safe the car is.
B789c 1 year ago
This isn't neccessarily an "official" test, it could of been park of development. The F1 was designed to be capable of passing and/or exceeding the crash test requirements of a then (mid-90's) Formula 1 car, an ncap test is nothing when compared to that. I remember reading somewhere (i think it was in autocar magazine) that the F1 came away from the 30mph head-on test with barely a cracked bumper, was still driveable, and the tub was undamaged. It's price was £640000.
russ13b 1 year ago
der arme man der das auto zahlen musste <.<
hhhjkl 1 year ago
AEEEIII! MY EYES, IT BURNS, IT BURNS!
starstarstar42 1 year ago
this is liek a millino dollar test
alexdogg93 1 year ago
Way for them to waste a 2 million dollar car.
GunsOfThePhoenix 1 year ago
@GunsOfThePhoenix
they could afford it
they needed to in order to make it roadlegal AND prove it was safe too
the manafacturing cost of one test car wasn't 2 million
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago
@McLarenMercedes Today it cost 2 million for a used one, back then it cost half million for a new one.
GunsOfThePhoenix 1 year ago
NO TEST DUMMY? NO AIRBAG? This test is basically useless without a $50,000 test dummy wired with sensors and impact data. This car doesnt even appear to have seats or an interior. Whats that on the dash? Cardboard and plastic bags covering those big holes on the right and left of the car? There should be a dashboard there. I DOUBT this car even has an ENGINE in it. Again, this test is useless without a fully built car AND a test dummy.
mrjustin5 1 year ago
There's just the steering wheel of the car that shakes a bit...
+1
FranceElsass 1 year ago
segurança 0.
gumaverick 1 year ago
WOA!! This hurts
DelrayCustoms 1 year ago
i can't believe they wasted one precious example of the worlds best car.
jebacjutube 1 year ago
@jebacjutube
I can't believe you posted such a stupid post.
Any new car MUST pass certain crash standards. This test in fact PROVED it was a lot safer than any other supercar back then. The carbon fibre monocoque was incredibly solid and strong.
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago
@jebacjutube It wasn't a production car, this specific car was built before they started the production for these cars. It's like a test mule, but for safety. Plus, its just a car, regardless of how good or rare it is. Damn, people are lost without material goods....
SuperleggeraVW 1 year ago
wow, it really holds up well with no cabin intrusion at all.
RhODomhnaill 1 year ago
this is a nightmare! not a video!! :'O
jack390 1 year ago
@McLarenMercedes baah.
fatleader 1 year ago
you must be incredibly stupid not to realize this is slow motion
or you're a troll acting dumb on purpose to piss people off
either way you're useless
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago
Gordon Murray said the McLaren still worked and could be driven after this crash
only car ever at that time to have done that after a crash test
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago
from front, F1 is waaaay more tough than a 5-star crash rated car... I mean that thing is made from carbon fiber
Chezzy79 1 year ago
it was like watching joe theismann's leg break over and over and over again. The most painful thing i had to watch today.
timsk 1 year ago
omg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
philxmaverickdj 1 year ago
how fast was it going, 30mph?
MikeTysonisaspider 1 year ago
@MikeTysonisaspider lol for sure, seems too slow
lioxait 1 year ago
ever heard of highspeed cameras? later when they watch the crash it seems like the car is going 10-20 times slower
the ignorance of some
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago
@MikeTysonisaspider 5mph
toyce01 1 year ago
you'd better be joking
it's not funny
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago
Shame to see this beauty crashed:(
Skakhti 1 year ago 3
Who cares if the McLaren F1 is safe or not!!?? If you want a safe car, get a volvo!!
Mazotheman 1 year ago 47
the safety of Volvo is a MYTH embedded into the minds of people through Volvo's commercials
look up the EuroNCAP crash tests and realize lots of manafacturers from all over the world did better in those tests than the Volvo models
only with the new XC60 did Volvo really excel
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago
@Mazotheman Renault > Volvo, in security, check euroncap, renault has more 5 star cars than volvo in the past decade
Yoaltecuhtli 1 year ago
@Yoaltecuhtli Yes, but Renault has manufactured more car models than Volvo, so what you need to do, is to compare average rating. Volvo = 4,6 and Renault =4,4.
Mazotheman 1 year ago
@Mazotheman maybe the peron wanting the car is not an idiot and dont want to end up being part of his car when it a simple crash at 40mph?
makoshark40 1 year ago
@Mazotheman
If you want a triple threat, GET A MCLAREN!
boogioogigoof 1 year ago
@Mazotheman no if you want a safe car get the smart car
ChevyZ71djd 1 year ago
@ChevyZ71djd
NOT... Yeah the car might hold up but good luck surviving inside of it since there is such a small crumple zone..
ofnarcr 1 year ago
@ofnarcr have u seen the video!! it got a high rating
ChevyZ71djd 1 year ago
@ChevyZ71djd You mean the one where the dummy smacks its face on the steering wheel?:P I just thought it was an odd example since there are loads of other cars that are so much more safe haha.
ofnarcr 1 year ago
@Mazotheman
Considering the owners of a F1 are going to drive it to insane speeds I think they'd be happy knowing they sit in a car which won't desintigrate into a thousand pieces if they crash with it. Fact is one BMW Company Exective crashed one doing over330km/h on the German Autobahn. He was fine. A testimony to the safety of the car.
And Volvo doesn't make the safest cars. That's something their commercials have brainwashed people into thinking. Some years back several beat them in crash
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago 3
@Mazotheman WELL I THINK ANYBODY WHO CAN AFFORD SUCH A CAR HAS THE RIGHT TO BE CONCEARNED ABOUT THIS CAR'S SAFETY..(THINK ALSO THAT THIS CAR HAS MUCH GREATER ACCELERATION AND TOP SPEED THAN A VOLVO..)AND IT'S INCREDIBLY SAFE AS YOU WATCHED...THE GUY WHO CAN AFFORD A VOLVO WILL CONCEARN ABOUT VOLVO'S SAFETY.SO BOTH HAVE THE RIGHT TO WORRY ABOUT THEIR CAR'S SAFETY..
jimphys 10 months ago
What a cryin' shame, I could have driven that car.
rlnilson 1 year ago
as if you'd crash it that slow. lol
owengoslin101 1 year ago 41
@owengoslin101 its in slowmotion
brnrubber303 1 year ago
@owengoslin101
you think that is normal speed
Geez, some people...have they EVER heard of slowmotion used to study crash tests?
And if you knew it was slow downed and tried to be funny. Stupidity is never funny. Stupid people end up causing a lot of shit.
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago 9
@McLarenMercedes do you think even when it wasn't slowed down any one would crash it that slow
surredneck66 1 year ago
@McLarenMercedes theres something called sarcasm. Leave your house more and talk to people.
windflasher0 6 months ago
@owengoslin101
Probably being played in slow motion.
TheEarthRacer 11 months ago
wow dumbass its slow motion
Blackblade22100 1 year ago
wow the comments are funny.. apprently, just an observation, people that look up exotic car crashes arent very smart...
bluered1322 1 year ago
FAIL. The slowest a crash test will be performed in a head on crash is 40mph.
MujaRagHeadKillaUK 2 years ago
wow your a dumbass
Blackblade22100 1 year ago
I'm a dumbass??? Never heard of NCAP crash assessment programme??? You fail again American.
MujaRagHeadKillaUK 1 year ago
No it isn't. It is filmed with a high speed camera so when it is played back you see it in slow motion.
R33SimonM 2 years ago
at the moment of the crash you would drive around 120-200kph so you would probably not survive
czarcio333 2 years ago
UBERKRASS!
Tryman008 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this was at 5kph
pulpfictionost 2 years ago
i wish it said how fast i was going lol! man thats an expensive crash test lol
rainwater014 2 years ago
35 to 40 Mph based on most european and american streets (not highway speed tho)
jitterball 2 years ago
They say, the designer of the Mclaren F1 was so possitive of how well the F1 would cope in a head on collision, he wanted to sit in the drivers seat during the collison, but Mira/EuroNCAP wouldn't let him, for Health and Safety reasons. He was right about the outcome.
DSmaster99 2 years ago
NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
rangegod98 2 years ago 46
lmao
jraybay 2 years ago
the only thing with carbon fiber it would be like coming to a dead stop at what ever mpg you are traveling, the same as hitting a tree, i cant see it absorbing much of the impact
dfhohj 2 years ago
The frame is carbon fiber, just the body.
witeflight 2 years ago
isnt*
witeflight 2 years ago
Thats actually true, but that is also why they design the carbon fiber and other parts to shatter and splinter away. Since it doesn't crumple up like sheet metal, the shattering and splintering dissipates the energy of the crash. If you look at an F1 or Indy car crash you'll see that they look like they burst into a million pieces; its because thats what they're designed to do... all of those pieces flying off pull energy out of the crash and protect the driver.
tpaladino 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Now you would need to worry about carbon fiber parts flying thru the windshield and impelling the driver, I would rather it bent into the impact, BTW is'nt this test on a carbon fiber body in which case the parts seemed to bend. I didnt think carbon fiber shattered, I have yet to see any carbon fiber brake let alone shatter.
dfhohj 2 years ago
RIght I guess the flying shards are a problem, but I think that impact trauma is a bigger concern since even in a crash you're still inside the car and protected. I dont think the shards would have enough individual energy to penetrate the windshield.
As for this test, it doesn't look to be very high speed, which probably has something to do with it. But watch some high speed crashes of race cars and you'll see. Carbon fiber is very strong but when it finally breaks it does so very violently.
tpaladino 2 years ago
ITS SLOW MOTION wow so much dumbasses in 1 video
Blackblade22100 1 year ago
What are you talking about? Everyone knows its slow motion. When I say that it's not a high speed test, I mean over 100mph or so, which is usually what you see in F1 or Indy crashes when they break apart.
Also, you should learn proper grammar before you call people 'dumbasses'.
tpaladino 1 year ago
wow are you an idiot by any chance?
Blackblade22100 1 year ago
To expect a 100mph crash test on a road car is pretty dumb. You don't honestly believe anyone to survive that w/o a crash helmet do you?
vk45de 1 year ago
Where did I say I expected a 100mph crash test?
tpaladino 1 year ago
This does not look like a high speed impact, wonder what speed they tested it at?
oirish71 2 years ago
They call that slow-motion ;-)
I think it's 50-80 km/h (or around 30-50 mph)
Dutchdragonblade 2 years ago 4
THEY FORGOT TO PUT THE AIRBAGS
0Megabounce0 2 years ago
I think they test it if its good eough without airbag?
Xtreamehawk4eva 2 years ago
the subtitles say that this is the only car that you could drive after a crash test
ritko53 2 years ago 4
I'm sure quite few cars can do that. Probably most of the cars that have the engine in the back.
bugmenotpls 2 years ago
well.. if and only if the front tires still able to move
neoxavier 2 years ago
No. Most cars would not have working front wheels after a crash, due to the impact damage. Hence, unable to drive away.
KikiDaiso 2 years ago
wow, next time im in a mclaren, i wil know if i crash, the owner will be the one to kill me, not the car
EatmyDust1311 2 years ago 4
nice one!
GTRboyx 2 years ago
Lollll
jraybay 2 years ago
Is unsurprising it did so well. To make a car handle good, it needs to be strong. to be safe, it needs to be...
strong.
richardmaudsley77 2 years ago
makes me sick to my stomache.
rbtinnsmith 2 years ago
what a car, the windsheld didnt even break!
cragster101 2 years ago
I bet the scraps of that car cost more than my car. :D
VoltexEvo8MR 2 years ago 35
@VoltexEvo8MR Psh, I bet the scraps cost more than my House. :P
gibsonlespaul2 1 year ago
@VoltexEvo8MR To be fair, i bet the fucking timing belt cost more than most people's cars :D
Cityside90 1 year ago
it's a shame to wreck such a beauty:)
90Ming90 2 years ago 4
it came out in 1996, they didn't have the virtual crash test stuff back then
zachray263 2 years ago
Wow. thats actually a really good standing.
deepakm 2 years ago
barely even flexed! very very impressive
steelstrings1312 2 years ago
the car was probably a shell, not a full mclaren in blue paint lol. the windshield didn't even break.. ?wow
lucashoughton1 2 years ago
Weight and mass matter in a car crash, so it was the real thing. It's possible that they used ballast as a substitute for the expensive innards, though.
NoveltyMop 2 years ago
OH GOD NO! WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT?! haha.
xmadnessmanx 2 years ago
to see if u would live or die if u had the car and got into a car accident?? LOL
MasterGamer3001 2 years ago
With most modern hyper cars they can work out roughly how well they're gonna perform in a crash, so things like the FXX will be MOSTLY safe. This may well be the saddest video ive seen :(
adam0900909 2 years ago
no way this car could resisted that much..what speed was it going? if its real than its phenomenal
gregfiesta1 2 years ago
dude the whole car is made of carbon fiber and other strong, light materials, the car was going atleast 40 mph
StealthMonkey25 2 years ago
i thought they were testing it on 60 mph..u should check out lamborghini diablo same results
gregfiesta1 2 years ago
Search for "ford rs200 crash test", even better!
henkkaS4 2 years ago
how do you work that out its only doing 50 km/ph 31 mph....and it sucked balls
thetweedtweeker 2 years ago
Comment removed
Tridentgumisgood 2 years ago
lol
ILuvQuebec 2 years ago
what was the speed?
krashevich 2 years ago
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!
(tears down my face)
RicardoR5 2 years ago 4
hmm it did pretty damn good
qwerty12345678911 2 years ago
CRUNCH
FordMazda3 2 years ago
That is why mr bean lives.....
xaxa!!!
MrDraktis 2 years ago 2
It does pretty good
nUaSvAy 2 years ago 3
poor car :(
DunkleVollNuss 2 years ago 2
It was the 1992 Prototype-Pre release. I would have tested it at well to see how good the car holds up to a fronal impact. And then when its done i would replace the bent frame and rebuild it.
145thproduction 2 years ago
mclaren f1 :| whi ?
you distroed a legend for a cras test on 70 km/h max :|
even so you ... sry for the car ...
R3spaWn89 2 years ago
lmfao did you see the subtitles!!!
killa397 2 years ago