Added: 4 years ago
From: FreeGlobalEnergy
Views: 201,362
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (370)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @crashpilot2

    Do you remember the movie Sleeper where Woody Allen was cryogenically frozen then woken up in the future. He see's a robot Butler & says, "That's amazing! Do these come in female, because the possibilities are endless" LOL. I still laugh really hard at that scene. Human-like robots will be part of our future in every aspect. They will drive the buses, They will be the police officers, already computerized cameras are ticketing drivers. Damn Fascist technology.

  • @crashpilot2

    I'm already thinking that I want to buy one of those exo-skeletons so that I can go into basements & carry out washers, dryers & freezer units like they were pillows, I could earn so much more money & when walking robots are smart enough & agile enough I'll send it into the basements to get the appliances for me. Not so impractical a thought as robots build & paint our cars today.

  • @crashpilot2

    I saw a documentary where a man says he drew up plans of sending robots to the moon & the robots will build the space stations before man ever arrives. NASA liked the idea so much they are now building the worker robots. Movies like i-robot etc is our future. These writers are true visionaries. In the 1980s walking robots were clumsy & stupid, now you have robots like Asimo with computerized equilibrium & facial recognition, RoboCop & Terminator is with no doubt in our future.

  • @crashpilot2

    Scientists will eventually figure out how to harness fusion.

    Teleportation is now proven as a possibility.

    Solar panels several feet wide now in the lab fit in the palm of your hand producing the same wattage as the large panels.

    Two earth-like planets have been discovered many light years away. I suppose with either fusion powered space craft or teleportation getting there won't be a problem. The futuristic sci-fi movies of today are the realities of the future.

  • @crashpilot2

    Philosophy, hypothesis, theory. Scientists speculating, it really just means they, (we) don't know everything there is to know. They have obtained a great deal of knowledge yet throughout time just as they believe the limits have been reached then we pass a barrier that science never thought possible. To be skeptical is wise as fraud is in abundance, but I like it that you are not closed minded to the possibilities of the unknown or physics of the impossible.

  • @crashpilot2

    There are understood laws of earth but if energy cannot be created then how is it the Universe is expanding. Where does the energy come from that allows it to expand. Where did all the energy come from in space. How did the sun become filled with hydrogen then ignited. Black holes, White holes, Super Novas, etc. Where did all this constantly energy producing energy come from as if constantly being created.

  • @crashpilot2

    You somehow think that ALL advanced technology is immediately produced for us, the citizens of the world to use at will. You seem to think there are no secrets that governments keep to themselves. You know that is not true. US Military has many secret testing bases. The technology being held by the government is hundreds of years advanced beyond what we are allowed to have access. The technologies we use today presented as cutting edge is only outdated military discard.

  • @crashpilot2

    Free Energy has several different interpretations.

    I recently won a Free Gas Fill up Card. Is it really free gasoline? Free Energy for my truck?

    So if it's Free Gas then it must have just appeared out of thin air. See my point?

    Build a Solar Panel & it's Monetarily Free Energy. Does it come from nowhere? of course not, but ancient man would view the solar panel as magic, only because he didn't understand the technology.

    Perhaps advanced technology only appears to be magic to us.

  • @nlpjohn

    ... and so when you are bored with all the sex & Hollywood actresses you now spend the remainder of your days on YouTube?

  • Fascinating subject.

    Great narration by William Woollard. (Ex-Top Gear and Tomorrows World presenter). Much better than the shouty, patronising attitudes and presenting style of todays science programs. (Bang Goes The Theory - guilty as charged.)

  • Great information. I think I will add it to my next book to increase awareness.

    Thanks!

  • You can not hang a meter on free energy 

  • @prentis45

    1

    That statement by Westinghouse was true in Tesla's day but they could have never imagined what we do today with satellite pay tv or mobile phones, if the transmission flows in all directions without wires then what is to stop people taking it without paying for it, people tried that but technology prevented signal theft. They had to use wires back then but today wireless electricity free or not can be metered. Industry is just now developing short distance wireless electricity...

  • @FreeGlobalEnergy no its not. Tesla Had wireless power all figured out in the early 1900's. its Big Business monopoly's that control what comes out, because they are the ones funding the industry. And it was JP Morgan not Westinghouse that said that. and JP Morgan is a rotten tycoon supported by the Rockefellers. its called Inductive coupling.

  • @prentis45

    2

    Industry is building a plate that is installed in the floor of your house. current still flows into it the old fashion way via wires and a meter but the rest changes your way of life. All of your electronics are fitted with a wireless receiver, no more cords for anything. Industry could just jump to Tesla's invention but this way industry can offer you 100yrs of tiny upgrades so that you are always disposing of the old to buy the new advanced model year after year

  • @FreeGlobalEnergy the electro smog radiation,from our "benevolent" induetry will eventually kill the people in that house.

  • @bobo007xx

    You must be referring to Electro Magnetic Frequencies (EMF)

    Tesla sat in the middle of his experiments with lightning bolts flying all around him & claimed it had no effect on him, but then how could he know what it was doing to him on a cellular level, although he lived to be 87.

  • @FreeGlobalEnergy - 'Tesla sat in the middle of his experiments with lightning bolts flying all around him '

    ha! yeah that is about how very high voltages with very low currents are easy to handle - like you can touch an ionisers output - but if it had a high current it'd kill you.

    Some folks can withstand more current than others - generally the more you lean towards amphibious the less current you can handle, purely as you are less dry.

  • @bobo007xx

    I used my trifield meter to determine how far EMFs were radiating from my small household microwave.

    On the back of the meter it reads.

    -"Studies suggest biological effects may begin to occur near 3 milligauss of AC magnetic field, 1 kilovolt/m of AC power and approximately .1 mW/cm2 of microwave power."-

    Close up to my microwave the meter pegs out, very dangerous.

    .1 mW/cm2 is reached at 10 feet in pulses & the meter senses microwaves as far as 25 ft away from the microwave.

  • @FreeGlobalEnergy - you shouldn't eat things cooked in a microwave -

    w w w execonn(dot)com/sf/

    it's good for sterilising instruments, or if you want to build a deathray and fry people.

    re. what link says on double blinds - I accidently noticed when raising plants in plugs (for transplanting outside later) that the plants with the plastic ID tag in their growing space all grew smaller and less healthy than the other plants. & I didn't even consider that might happen.

  • @bobo007xx

    I took my trifield meter to a busy intersection with business where all of the power lines are under ground.

    The magnetic range on the meter reads from 1 to 100. 3 being unsafe. some places I walked the needle pegged out to 100 which I assumed is where large bundles of wires lay. I got high readings around the stop lights & the ally behind the businesses where residential housing was. I walked into businesses & showed employees where it was dangerous for them to stand.

  • @bobo007xx

    I wonder what it means "biological effects may occur". Supposedly mankind was very different on a younger, developing earth, supposedly highly radioactivity in different regions, enough to cause permanent deformations of the cells of people who wandered into these zones causing changes & loss of skin pigmentation as well as the deformation of skull structures that created the varied races of people so are we changing our genetic cell structure with all this man made radiation?

  • @FreeGlobalEnergy - mostly it just causes cancers, the cells cease to function as parts of the whole body. Same way people ceased to function as parts of the ecosystem. The soul is a type of electromagnetic field, so it is possible, if you're ensouled and evolved enough, to use that to deter bad effects of radiation and the like. But it's not a thing I'd rely on, could fry your brain trying to keep that amount of willpower going - and you wouldn't be able to sleep so you'd get ill anyway.

  • @bobo007xx

    A science documentary exposed the supposed fact that without the effects of the moon in our solar system would have created an earth where we as humans in our present form would not exist, that without the moon we would look like some sort of hideous creature, although I imagine that if we were all hideous creatures we might see ourselves as very good looking and that our present form would seem hideous.

  • @FreeGlobalEnergy - there probably wouldn't be any biological (that includes things like crystals, they grow from seeds and require water systems too) life at all if the Moon wasn't as it is, seeing as it controls the tides and a lot of circadian rhythms. Oddly it often seems to not be factored in as an influence on their being an atmosphere and a climate, without which there is of course no life possible beyond some rocks that form from magma and the like.

  • @bobo007xx

    So maybe the magnetic fields aren't killing us but in fact evolving us into a new species,but from what I see we're getting dumber.I walk into a gas station, the attendant says may I help you, I say $50 on pump #10, I fill up & go back in for change, she says may I help you, I say yeah Pump # 10?, surprised that she doesn't remember me from 2 minutes ago, she looks confused & asks, you want gas on #10? I say no I gave you $50 & I want change,she's like, Oh, ok. I see this more & more

  • @FreeGlobalEnergy - that's EM smog and cellphones and eating shit like junk microwaved food etc that makes them like that. Cell phones totally scramble short-term memory, most people I know are like Alzheimers victims for many years, not possible to get any sense out of them, they don't remember anything, they act up and are really brattish and selfish all the time. Put it this way - if you ask say bushmen in Africa they'd say unless you walk barefoot on natural earth you're ungrounded.

  • You really have to be a moron to believe this.

  • ANY device that claims that it produces more energy than it consumes needs to have it power itself. Yet, when that is done, the thing loses energy faster than it can make it. I've seen a lot of claims but none of them stay running for long when they power themselves. Conservation of energy.

  • i need free energy i deserve it can some 1 giv me a self powered generator tnx

  • Brilliant but WHAT WAS THE CONCEPT THAT WAS USED how did he do it thats the important part otherwise he died for nothing ???

  • Well for all you non believers, there is more energy out of a nuclear powerplant than it costs to create, there goes the idea that it isn't possible. See, we are holding on to everything we know and that is our truth. But do you really think that that is it?...your guys are jokes really...call themselfs scientists and laugh about people who ones thought the earth was flat.

  • @moonsmilelucide

    1

    Perhaps it depends upon perception. The fuel is inexpensive

    & the energy generation is the most concentrated source of any other fuel but even so the average nuc plant only utilizes 1% of stored energy then it is disposed of yet the advances in the breeder reactor since the 1950s are profound. The breeder reactor utilizes 95% of the energy & creates fuel faster than it can burn therefore feeding other reactors & waste life is only 40yrs

  • @moonsmilelucide

    2

    Toshiba built a mini breeder reactor completely self contained. It will run a small city for 40yrs without ever requiring refueling. Also if all countries used breeder reactors then the entire planet could run strictly off of the old waste for 100yrs without ever requiring mining for a single spec of uranium. Endless advancements are continually made in all fields of energy production but corporations won't just give it away for free

  • @moonsmilelucide

    3

    I think I can satisfy the nay sayers who say zero point energy is impossible with the concept that energy is always derived from somewhere, it's just not always understood where the energy is coming from by both the inventor and scientists alike. There are many machines scientists have walked away from scratching their heads. it took science 70yrs to figure out how a be can fly. Prior to that all scientific calculations determined that it was impossible for a bee to fly

  • @FreeGlobalEnergy They were not using the correct formula for the flight of bees and have since correct it. First of all, you don't seem to know the actual definition of zero point energy. If you did, you would not bring it up. Look up the definition please.

    Nobody claimed that flying was impossible. Many animals, not only birds and bats, can fly (or glide). It took a lot of study, of birds wings to understand how they flew. Then design a fixed wing apparatus to mimic it.

  • @UnderManiac

    True, scientists were not using the correct formula because they were baffled in that the wings were too small to support the weight of the bee therefore news paper articles were titled "Bee Flight is Scientifically Impossible", and it was "impossible" for 70yrs from the 1st study. The only way scientists got the correct formula was the invention of digital photography then they could see the exact wing movements frame per frame as they could not before.

  • @UnderManiac

    Correction: Looking back I'm not sure why I used the term zero point energy, that makes no sense. I think I was grasping for the modern dictionary term for Free Energy or maybe overunity in that both may appear to be overunity to the inventor but if magnets are assisting in rotation yet not measured as input is not overunity but an over sight.

  • @moonsmilelucide

    4

    Scientists are very smart but box themselves into limitations. On the NASA website an article reads that scientists thought Mach1 was impossible & it was impossible for a few reasons if you would reach mach 1 speeds then wind drag would pull you back, the faster you go the more the drag, they said we don't have engines that can operate at those speeds & a jet would break apart at those speeds & pilot can't think fast enough to maneuver the jet... All true...

  • @moonsmilelucide

    5

    So what did the inventors work on? creating an engine that supersedes mach1 in order to compensate for wind drag, build a stronger jet, add computers to think for the pilot. It's all in the technology, achieving the "impossible", breaking barriers set in place by laws. Breaking, bending or warping those laws all has to do with technological advances & a better understanding of the effects of that technology in relation to the laws in place which means there are no boundaries

  • @moonsmilelucide

    The energy doesn't not come from nothing. It comes from the release of nuclear binding energy. Elements heavier than iron can release energy by splitting up into lighter elements (aka nuclear fission). Elements lighter than iron can release energy by combining to form heavier elements (aka nuclear fusion). Iron nuclei are the most tightly bound of all, and can be considered the ultimate "ash" of all nuclear burning.

  • @moonsmilelucide A nuclear power plant does NOT break the laws of physics. It is well known, scientifically, how they work. Einstein's equation (E=MC²) is the reason it works. They use a highly unstable mineral (Uranium or Plutonium). It is not labelled as free energy. You could equally argue, in your opinion, that wind and solar power are also free energy devices. Yet not one technologist would claim it to be.

  • Hey, why not buy a fucking camera? Plasma is right out side your window.

  • A surge of power accompanied by mysterion cello music. Hmmmm...

  • Here we are in the 21st century, and there's still people who believe this crap. Go figure.

  • fuck me

  • Oh wow, I just realised everyone who claims to have invented free energy will eventually die or has already died.

    Wait; that's true for all humans.

  • Yea, and hypothetically, if I told you to stop your research or offered you 10 mill & you refused then you suddenly end up dead it must have been from natural causes, right?

    What happens if I decide to take over the territory of the Jamaican Mafia & sell drugs to their clients?

    Do you suppose my death would be of natural causes?

    It doesn't matter weather you threaten the Jamaican mafia's empire or the oil empire, you will be dealt with one way or the other

  • @FreeGlobalEnergy That is always the conjecture every proponent of perpetual energy claims, that the big oil cartel did away with them. I say it's an urban legend. solar power is free energy, so is wind power, yet the inventors of the technology is alive and well. Except for the ones that died of old age or natural deaths.

    Where is your proof of these oil empire related slayings? I want to see undeniable proof. It's your claim, the onus is on your to provide the evidence.

  • @UnderManiac

    You live in an over protected environment if you do not believe hitmen exist, that CIA & other such terrorist organizations do not exist. You are looking for court cases of oil cartels murdering or conspiring to murder their competitors. I personally cannot find any but lets say you were a billionaire & one invention would collapse your empire, wouldn't you hire a hitman & payoff the judges & police to stay out of jail? There wouldn't be any courts, no proof. Isnt that the point?

  • cool vid .. i took gasoline one time from the local gas station and put it under a vacuum 29 hg what i found is that 1/3 og it is waste we are paying for

  • Where is his invention? why isn't it out on the market available to the public? why isn't it used in cars by now? Why isn't it used at homes on daily basis by now? Because what I had said in my comment right below is the truth and nothing but the truth..

  • @voyrnj Also, why is there no science written confirming this device?

  • his invention would revolutionize fuel dependance and power dependance in the world, that means billions of dollars of loss for multi-milion dollarl companies. He was morelikely mourdered. he wasn't aware of the fact that the largest companies in the world are the largest highly organized mobs in the world, one pocket pays the other and one hand washes the other hand, he just didn't know about how highly those mobs are organized and who gets paid under the table by them.

  • The reason the government sides with the oil industry is the tax $ generated by gasoline & Diesel sales. The more wasteful the transport technology or home fuel, the more fuel product sold = more tax $.

    The more wasteful the energy creates more jobs, the strip mining, oil production etc. cheap or free energy existed in the 1950s but a growing population need jobs & we scream to the government when there are not enough jobs so the government takes control & creates jobs through waste & wars. Sad

  • What can i say? RIP Chernetski.

    Everybody dies, even without governamental agents.

  • LOOK UP 'STEORN' public demo in dublin proving COP>1 to the world with there NO CEMF motor , with successfull replications done by JLN labs of france and many youtubers, user TinselKoala was the first to close his loop, just search steorn then order by date not relevance.

    look up the rodin coil , and marko rodin ..

    peace love happieness

  • Sudden death has happened to many scientists that develop astonishing energy projects. This happened to the man that created the hydrogen fusion water reactor for a car that ran on H20. He was asked over and over again by oil companies to stop his research or join them, many millions of dollars were offered to the man yet he refused, he died within several weeks of these events. I am not a conspiracy theorist but it doesent take an over paid investigator or a genious to realize what happened.

  • Fact is there are people who theorize in every case they die of natural causes but when you theorize foul play then that is a conspiracy theory therefore you are automatically a conspiracy theorist. People have twisted the meaning to imply "nut case" which effectively keeps the masses away from the truth. We need to break down the true meaning, just look up the word conspiracy. Dan Rather said in his career 90% of conspiracy theories turned out to be true

  • Also look at all the people imprisoned for conspiracy to murder, conspiracy to defraud etc etc etc. Let's say you walk into a neighbor's basement & see blueprints for banks, he says oh that's just a hobby of mine. You see a planner that has a future date circled then you notice people showing up at midnight carrying boxes of ammo & guns... What conclusion would you come to? Perhaps that they plan to rob a bank? if so then that is a conspiracy theory. Will anyone listen to you?

  • You are referring to Stanley Meyers. The story is he was poisoned at an investors dinner meeting. The public coroners report says , aneurysm, natural causes, open shut. Or is it? I looked up symptoms of poisoning & one symptom is aneurysm. Case re-opened. CIA are experts in making a hit look like an accident or natural causes & with electronic weaponry these days it is easier than ever before

  • I laugh at these videos cos you dont get more energy out than you put in! Saying that i believe we know fuck all about how things really work we have only scratched the surface of physics, so it may be possible, but not now with todays thinking and technology. I must admit though tesla was a mind way ahead of even todays thinking. If theres a chance of free energy his ideas would be it.

  • It may not be free energy in the term coming from absolutely nowhere but maybe you don't fully comprehend where the energy is coming from. I have a box that magically creates electricity, no moving parts, no noise & I never need to fill it with gasoline. It's called a solar panel. If I presented such a device without technical explanation to authoritative figures in medieval days would they marvel at such a device or burn me as a witch along with my solar panel?

  • Observe very carefully. Science has the final word, right? Scientists reveal all there is to know correct? Then that means Al Gore is 100% correct as he says the debate is over, all findings are in...Yet scientists say bullshit, they will tell Gore he is wrong. Al Gore has hijacked science & it has been done for centuries. Scientists are employed by corporations & governments & as employees are under strict contract of non disclosure or risk of imprisonment. We are only allowed limited knowledge

  • In ancient time the official science was the earth was flat, anyone who debated that was put to death. Any archeologist who reports facts only are fired, those "facts" must fit the theories of famous people in science weather the theories are right or wrong. There is a great deal of science cover ups if you research "Hidden Archeology" & it does not end there, consider yourself a toddler outside an X rated show, your not getting in to see that show, they don't want you to see the dirty truth

  • not quite ancient times ,60,000 years ago people had knowlage of the spherical eath and solar system , so only in recent history was it 'official science',

  • A Persian or Babylonian astrologer 3, 000 years ago thought earth was flat.

    Ferdinand Magellan was the first man to sail around the world. That was the first time it was conclusively proven that the world was round.

    When I said "official" I meant officials in charge not official as in... Official. LOL.

    Sorry, please forgive my misuse of the English language, I just couldn't think of another way to phrase that sentence.

  • The story I mentioned prior is only one individual, in one region of the globe who put people to death who opposed his view the world was flat, it was used to make a point but you wish to elaborate on that point. Yes, in some parts of the globe there people with very advanced knowledge of mathematics & the solar system which they mention the Gods came down from the heavens (skies) & taught this to them. It makes one think. Intelligent life on other planets visit earth?

  • @GlobalAwareness2525 In ancient times it was proven by measurement and observation that the earth was not flat. There is the observation that you see the sails of a boat coming over the horizon before you see the entire boat, suggesting that the earth was a sphere. There were the observations of the earth's shadow on the moon that suggested a sphere as well. Ancient surveyors also measured the curvature of the earth with an amazing amount of accuracy.

  • this is a CRT the blue light is polarized blue light due to the resonant field produced in the direction of light through a medium that contains fine particle of dust.

    the result photons release electrons to make the increase in power, MIT LECTURE 29 I THINK

  • Quantumcarl is a twat & probably uses a free energy vibrator to talk out of his ass ...

  • lol

  • Doesn't it just ache you to see a scientist taking the credit for another scientists work and discoveries. Edison did just that! I never liked Edison because he became part of the huge military industrial complex. Edison sided with this complex as noted by his willingness to charge for electricity rather have it free for people as established by Tesla.

  • I imagine that the input power spikes when the output power spikes.

    Or it could be that whatever goes between the input and the light bulbs is experiencing a moment where... hmm... okay, so, if power is going from the input, through the plasma chamber, and then out the other end to the lights... if there's a drop in... drop in resistance or rise? Fuck, it's 3am.

    Basically, there's a moment where there's a higher transmission efficiency, but there is no over unity. I promise! :D

  • There is no such thing as free energy.

    Energy can only be converted, not created from nothing.

  • ok true yet i it not possible that we aren't harnessing all of the potential energy going into the system (any system)?

  • The knowledge you have learned in schools firstly is only knowledge you are allowed to know by governments. We are still only cavemen just scratching the surface of knowledge & awareness. It is incredible all of the advancements made in 150yrs. Many things always said to be impossible. Why did people say all throughout history that each stage was impossible? Because the limits of their own knowledge & imagination made it impossible for them, but not for the person with vision

  • In your own mind u may be lacking the ability to perceive that the energy some people can produce may only seem as if it appears from nowhere therefore impossible. A breeder reactor can produce or breed it's own fuel & produce more fuel than it can burn actually making more fuel for other reactors. At first that sounds impossible or like a breeder reactor is a free energy device but once I studied the details it is not over unity or free energy but simply highly efficient

  • Free energy also does not mean that the energy is not derived from nothing at all. A solar panel is a free energy device. The device must first be built, it does require the mining of materials then once built it uses energy from the sun. Nobody has to maintain the sun, nobody has to pump fuel into the sun, government or corporations do not charge u to use the sun or tax u for the use of the sun although I guaranty u they will eventually so presently solar is free energy...

  • Presently it is difficult to comprehend solar as free energy because monetarily it is over priced, this is done on purpose but can't remain that way as an old very large panel output can now be held in the palm of your hand. They are getting smaller & more powerful to where eventually the roof of your car will be enough to power an EV & be sensitive enough to run on moonlight & starlight plus be affordable. That's free energy.

  • Energy as we seem to know on this planet does not come from nowhere, it all must have a source so if we use the sun where did the energy come from to make the sun, if it was a random event it would seem there would be multiple suns all ablaze, we sure are lucky we have at least one. Where did the energy come from that makes the core of the earth like a sun, how does that fuel keep burning at the core or in the sun for billions of years...

  • Lets expand out further, where does the energy come from that spins this planet in orbit, then lets venture out further, everywhere you look in space is full of energy, explosions, fuel substances, where does all that come from. Like I said, we are but mere cavemen, we just don't know yet, we don't have all the answers but if we tap into the energy of the cosmos then we have tapped into the very wheelworks of the Universe & that's Free Energy to us

  • If we have to send ships to a planet to mine the minerals is not free but if a simple device such as an antenna or dish can simply bring in space energy or some device that is somewhat simple in design & easy to manufacture can be labeled as a free energy device. Is it impossible such a device can be built? Unless they already exist then Yes, it is impossible, that is until we have further technological advances that will enable us to do things we never could before

  • Here is an example. lets say it is 1975, I have the money & I tell an inventor I want a robot that will walk, run, climb stairs & will recognize people and faces & I want it by 1976. What response would I get? Impossible, none of that technology exists, we have to invent the hydrolics but the computer processing it would require for all that you desire would make the robot the size of a Cadillac

  • Even if I could time travel, went back to 1975 & all I had was a video of Asimo it would still be impossible to build. In order for that robot to be built there would still be 30yrs developing each stage of every component but one thing few highly educated people realize is there must first be the dream, the imagination or nothing we have today exists, the plane, Mach 1, Mach 2 etc all must start out as the impossible dream. Impossible today, reality tomorrow

  • Warning to the CIA and others.

    This era in Earth's history will be called the Age Of Invention Suppression and those who support the actions of the greedy few will regret their foul deeds. When you pass over to the spirit side those who you terminated will be waiting for you. Everyone passes over one day - don't think you won't.

  • They will be judged by their Creator.

  • Yeah dog.

    The CIA is, after all, monitoring YouTube comments.

    There is a lot of genius and gold here, obviously.

    e_e

  • 20bucks sais the government or someone in the gas company killed him for making an awesome invention

  • Is time to have something like that to keep energy reasonable to keep the cost down. is sad when is well kept secret bc other companies want to make millions.

  • FREE ENERGY FOR ALL!

    and of course OIL IS ABIOTIC! research it! ;-)

  • They wont allow us to have free energy, shame really, think how much we could accomplish! Them fuckin free mason's eh? Yeah I heard about abiotic oil, it never made sense to me, I was all like "just how many tree's were there back then to get squished and produce all this oil?" Apparently there's some oil field's refilling! Scary to think of how little we know about our world. Death to 322, long live freedom!!!

  • take a look at bruce depalma's credentials and how many years the contributed to the established physics world. Then look at what the establishment did to him when he challanged the laws as they are called. He was ridiculed and labeled a wacko. he was brilliant

  • He was not.

    He was, in fact, a whacko.

  • oh shut up, jerk.If laws couldn't be broken then Aristotle would be correct on Gravity. Anyway, there was the rife machine which could actually cure any bateria but the government saw a medical crisis and banned it. From history, we can see that the whole world, every single country is keeping its stuff quiet and they do not want to share it to the world since world war 2. Looks like we need a world war 3 to really realize the full power of the secrets the government has held.

  • If these Rife devices really worked then why did so many people DIE from terminal disease even after using the "devices"? Sounds like they DON'T WORK.....

    Does anyone here ever think about testing, about evidence, before believing a claim?

  • The laws of energy are there cuz they are laws. They can't be broken.

    Dumbfucks.

    If this is real, Its hase a logical explination. It doesn't pull energy out of a asians ass

  • The problem is that some of the laws of physics are outdated with our current knowledge, and some phenomena cannot yet be explained or messured.

    Electromagnetic forces are currently only understod in a 2D way, when it really is a 3D moving phenomenon.

    So a sinus curve is not just up and down, but like a moving vortex spiral in 3D..

    scientists sometimes need to step back from what they allready know and look at things from a new perspective.

    Peace!

  • Last time I checked, we had a good theoretical formulation of EM in 3+1D, not 2D, and it's so far been used to build all the EM-based devices we use including the computer you typed your message on and the Internet over which it was transmitted. Seems like pretty good theory to me.

  • Present laws exist only because that is what we know so far. Scientists have not reached the cap of knowledge. They only know 1% of all that the Universe has to offer. I have noticed that in the field of science when they learn something new they often wont say that this new understanding defies laws but warps the fabric. things can warp their common knowledge which really simply does not fit within their outdated physics so laws have to be re-written

  • For one example the 2nd law has been broken on a nano scale, in fact it functions in reverse. It eventually corrects Itself but still this astounded physicists. Trust me. Compared to the knowledge to be obtained within 2000 yrs physicists today by comparison are but mere cavemen with clubs.

  • Perhaps, but such knowledge will be that which stands up to evidence. So far I haven't seen any _evidence_ that, say, these "magnet motors" and similar devices do anything. Curiosity Q: Why does the effect, say, only appear in the MMs but doesn't appear in all our other electromag devices and so require them to be designed with it in mind (which of course would mean you should hear about it in the textbooks!)?

  • Oh.

    At first I was like "Whaaaat" but then you told me to trust you and I was all "Hey, I never thought of it like that!".

    ARE YOU FUCKING STUPID?

    Name me anything that has caused a scientific law to be rewritten!

    They aren't out dated, you just say that so your argument can hold water.

    1%? Really? Fucking REALLY? Well. I'm glad you're here to relay to us from the future just how dumb we really are. Any chance you could tell us what we don't know? e_e

  • When I was a child black holes were only a theory, since then they found one, more recently they found thousands of them. None of our present laws explains all there is to know about these, the more scientists observe the more they learn things they never knew before such as stars that are pulled towards the black hole & not sucked in but flung around it at speeds of millions of miles per hour then returning actually orbiting around the black hole

  • they've not actually found any black holes.

    they have had to redefine multiple times what a black hole is like, because wherever they thought there should be one, the observable did not support the theory.

    so they have gone from sucking in everything, to sucking in equatorially and spurting jets from the poles

    (faster than light one must assume XD)

    forget big bang and black holes, look into plasma cosmology, it gets more empirical hits than gravity-only theory.

  • Then for some reason when I watch NOVA, a science show, the scientists keep calling these Black Holes and that they have discovered many of them.

  • Laws are fundamental.

    And black holes were described by many scientists as existing before they even found them or even finished with the writing of the theories!

    When a star of sufficient mass gets sucked in to a smaller black hole, it may have enough mass that instead of actually being crushed by the weaker black hole, it just maintains momentum around the edge.

    Not much is really known about black holes, though.

  • Yea, that's what I said. They were a theory then they found them.

  • Just making sure we're all on the same page here.

  • B

    One of the things scientists say they need to rewrite is the speed of light because research has found evidence that it was different in the past. The light from distant quasars passes through intervening gas clouds. Different atoms in the gas absorb light at specific wavelengths. By comparing these quasar absorption lines to those on Earth, researchers can test whether certain constants of nature really are constant.

  • Light is not an everything all the time constant. If that were true, our eyes wouldn't work.

    Light is bent and slowed by other objects such as water, gravity, atmosphere, glass, and many other objects.

    As they slow, the time it takes to travel from A to B is also affected. A photon hits an atom and, sort of like a Newtons Cradle, causes a photon emission. So when light hits glass, the light coming out from the other side isn't the light that went in, and it's traveling at a slower...

  • velocity due to some energy being lost in to the atom it collided with. This is observed as heat. This also falls in to the Conservation of Energy Law, which is why this Plasma Energy idea doesn't work.

  • A

    You are basing what you know now as the ultimate knowledge, the end of all discoveries but what you learn in school was not always known since man rose out of the mud, each phase of knowledge took centuries. Do you think the amount of time it took to invent the light bulb just happened one day in a lightning storm? all of this occurred in baby steps & it's fun to watch physicists scratch their heads, see new things & get excited like a child at Christmas then argue points of view.

  • So you're saying that there could be discoveries that suddenly change the observed physical laws of the universe?

    It's all about parameters.

    While we may not have a all encompassing knowledge of all existing particles, the rules they're governed by are a constant. These rules have been observed and noted as laws of the natural known universe.

    The only editing is when we find a NEW particle. We then ADD it and its properties to our excellent book. No editing to anything else occurs.

  • Also, I'm not saying we know everything, but the fundamental forces are seemingly a complete constant.

  • 1

    A great deal of confusion occurs in the meeting of the minds when each uses different terminology to describe the same thing such as inventor vs physicist so it really helps if one is not so rigid in the words used but has the ability to understand what one is deriving at.

  • The only reason there is confusion is because the person proposing something that's impossible doesn't understand the Science he's trying to explain. In this case, there is no such thing as creating new energy or making 1=2. If you do not agree it is because you do not know or understand the reasons why.

  • A

    One might think that someone so clever to create such a device could exlplain it properly but that is often the conflict & few have the patience to try & understand.

    like the example of permanent magnet motors that require electrical input. A meter is placed on input current then one on output.

    Input is lower

    Output is higher

    Impossible right? yes and no.

    What people overlook is that the device has magnets that input some of that energy.

  • Magnets are not adding any energy to a system.

    The best explanation is also the simplest and the most vague to those who do not understand magnets.

    Magnets in any system: =

  • Anything with a standard motor has windings & magnets, when energized spins a shaft, that shaft delivers power to drive machines.

    A permanent magnet resisting other magnets with the fields altered will spin a shaft, that shaft delivers power to drive machines.

  • No.

    The magnetic fields will even out and find equilibrium.

    The most you might get is a single spin.

    Like I said, magnets are =.

  • If you are of the brain type that you can't for example picture every moving part of a car engine in you brain and see them moving as they should but are better at number will likely never understand what I am saying.

    We are in a headlock, I see something you don't & your numbers don't calculate per your present education, there is no where to go from here as we both stand our ground in headlock

  • You see something made up.

  • B

    I likely am using the wrong terminology, magnets have force not energy but u know what I mean.There are motors that use magnetic bearings.That energy force floats the shaft constantly never shutting off & makes the motor far more efficient increasing the life of the motor. There are permanent magnet motors on the market now. They don't make the motor spin but they do make motors more efficient, there is something to be said about input magnetic force to assist but how do u measure that energy?

  • Just because there are magnetic bearings doesn't mean there are magnetic motors. :/

    Magnetic bearings are a proper and realistic proposition for the application of magnets in a system.

  • C

    Like in my Free Global Energy series, the perm mag motors presented there have electrical input, supposedly the magnets are aligned in such a way that pick up momentum, the usual explanation is then you get more out than in but that is not true at all as the magnet force never has a meter yet it is partial input energy, I don't think there is any such device that can measure magnet input. I think that is the missing calculation you need for it to make sense to you.

  • There is no input.

    Magnets are =.

  • D

    I suspect in many cases there are over looked realities staring us right in the face but the human mind is an odd thing as it can be closed off to seeing or comprehending many things, sometimes on purpose because it is trained not to pay attention to particular details.

  • E

    Anyone who plays with magnets realizes it is impossible to set them up to make a motor spin because as they propel they always attract locking the motor but people have discovered how to block or control that force so interestingly even though the returning force is blocked the magnet continues to function utilizing the outward force to propel a motor.

  • F

    If u can see in your mind the force of the magnetic flow around the magnet can be manipulated other than using liquid nitrogen but magnet blocking materials that disrupt the flow. This is where the secret is in tapping into this incredible force that lies within. Some don't think so but I believe that the force in a magnet is far greater than anyone gives credit to

  • There is no force. Force is something experienced. A magnet sitting in a room is experiencing no force. A magnet interacting with another object is.

    Magnets don't do work, they just repel or attract.

    Explain to me two things.

    1) You seem to jump from being "I BELIEVE" to "THIS IS A SCAM.", and your spelling and grammar go from being normal to broken, are you like... multiple people or some shit?

    2) Elaborate on this magnet blocking material and the tapping in to the "force" inside... please.

  • Do you really think FreeGlobalEnery is going to spill his guts about releasing energy from a magnet here on a silly video website?

  • He'll spill his guts never. Magnets just don't work like this. :/

  • You don't know how correct you are!

  • 2

    Usually physicists won't use the terminology that laws are broken but warped such as warping time & space could be considered by some as breaking those laws yet the physicist does not consider the laws broken as they still function normally until perhaps such a device is activated like teleportation or time travel then the law does not apply at that moment but will resume when such device is turned off

  • The warping of space/time is part of Relativity.

    It's all part of the already known laws.

  • No.

    Laws are fundamental, as I said before.

    If you have a warp drive, you're bending the physical laws of the universe, not just some man made rules.

    However, within' the warped space/time event, all events are well within' physical laws.

  • 3

    I watched a bright physicist explain how he taught his students that teleprotation was impossible now he said he was wrong, that on a small scale, I think it was atoms that are teleported using a laser light from one distance to another, then tests were done to keep extending that distance, he says next they will use larger & larger items until people are teleported from one location to another so maybe I shouldn't say they are breaking laws but warping them to their desires

  • 4

    So what I urge people to do is not be so closed minded or so rigid in their education or perhaps the lack thereof. There are many scams & lies but don't close down the possibility someone tapped into such abilities to warp the laws of physics beyond your present comprehension. Advanced technology is scooped up by the military who always experiment with things 30-40 yrs beyond what the public is allowed to know exists. Ares 51 is only one experimental facility

  • C

    Scientists are questioning the very fundamentals of laws & this is disturbing to some because humans like to establish a sense of security, a foundation of thought to build upon then not have to really think about it again but they really hate that things then change or were misunderstood in the first place undermining a very expensive college education but the fact is things are always changing, the Universe is expanding, the moon is drifting away from earth nothing is really ever fixed

  • D

    I wish I could travel 1 billion yrs into the future, I would download all of the patents, bring them back to present time & be a trillionaire 100X over but sadly I don't think that will happen. I do know that everything you see in any star trek movie or robot movie will come to pass, maybe 100yrs perhaps 200yrs but it will happen & many things completely unimaginable today. I have already lived long enough to see things I could not imagine as a child you will experience the same thing

  • E

    I keep trying to tell people that I think there is much that is simply misunderstood & then a government that covers up a lot. I try to expose those things in the videos I put together. I am not a Hollywood producer but I try to make sense of this puzzle & find where all the pieces go. I feel the grand picture cannot be found in the colleges because I think that system has been corrupted as well. It's really too deep for most & science has been manipulated as well

  • F

    & a persons first response is -Loon Alert- but seriously, I have seen the footage of a scientist asked why he submitted such a bogus article, he said I didn't, then the person says but your name is on it, the scientist said I submitted an article but I did not say the things mentioned in the article, the person asked, so someone changed your article, the scientist said, yes.

    When there is a political agenda people are actually altering science for a specific outcome for financial reasons

  • G

    Global warming & what really causes it is one such thing where massive profits are made with the carbon taxes. the drug company that makes Vioxx altered scientific findings to get it past FDA which killed 50,000 people. Scientists are not the bad guys, it is the corporations they work for or government meddling to suppress information & if they speak out will be black balled losing their careers. Most of our view of the world is a mask, I like to see what's being covered up or manipulated

  • Scientists do seem to know what happens when something gets sucked into a black hole but they do not know where it goes. We are not technically advanced enough yet to find this out. Sometime decades later we will be able to so meanwhile we live within the laws we have learned so far.

  • One idea is Hawking Radiation. Seems like a good explanation to me. Fits the fact that information cannot be destroyed.

    They have working theories, not actual proof.

    This is what's known as the "Event Horizon."

  • Another example is the Stealth fighter. Without the invention of the computer chip this jet will not fly, no man can keep this jet in the air. If you can imagine that the computer never was invented then someone presented the plans for the stealth (- the computer) to aeronautics engineers or scientists they would tell you this jet will not fly as it defies the laws of physics, & it does, but only through technology can it defy those laws or warp those laws. That is very important to understand

  • What's this crap about asian? And laws are just the best currently available theory. They may be wrong. So far nothing has come to challenge the laws of energy and stand up to rigorous testing with high professional standards, but maybe that will change. Do you have a machine you want to put on the line?

  • Stupid scientists still think they can invent anything without impunity. You make an invention that interferes with the profits of the energy or medical industry and you will be assasinated. Doing anything for the benefit of mankind... is a dumnass move... you will be killed. The "Laws" of physics are drilled into everyone's minds so noone goes looking for an alternative. The laws that govern conservation of mass and energy are just there to ensure profitibility for energy companies.

  • Man.

    The color the sky must be in the world you live in!

    Whacky.

  • Actually the color is blue... it's not so much conspiracy as it is common sense... If I owned a billion dollar industry and someone came up with something that would put me out of business... I'd have em snuffed. ... just sayin..

  • would that not be a conspiracy?

  • Just curious as to why the military surplus/liquidation always has 15KW, 20Kw, 30Kw, 60Kw generators up for sale? They must sell 10-15 large units a day. That is quite a number.

    I know. They have replaced them with free energy units!!!

  • Or they use them while they're guaranteed to be fully and maintenance free (ish) operational, then sell them when they're done...

  • Why not make a perpetual generator in space, no gravity, no friction, unlimited possibilities.

  • Go read a book. There's no such thing as zero-gravity, only microgravity.

  • There is friction in space.

  • The greathest minds in history are killed for the benefit of few billionaires...

    Sad world.

  • And some billionaires are also killed for bankrolling these geniuses.

  • indeed

  • yes the greathhhhhest minds are killed

  • That's why he's obviously still alive. :P

  • Perendev magnetic motor WORKS!!!

    its the magnet shielding and angling that makes it work.

  • That shit doesn't happen and everyone fucking knows it.

  • *** for AXE863 ***

    you really think you're smart ? because of people like you we're all going down. I wish to you that your children will surpass you in every way.

    while you talk stupid things someone is getting more rich on our land and with our hands and CERTANLY NOT with your brains HAHA.

  • Well.... SOMEONE'S butt hurt.