@gairabad There are good books and bad ones. M. L. Bunker taught his students NOT to "learn and remember", but to "learn, prove what you learned and then remember what you proved"
My father was a certified graphologist and "handwriting analyser" and he ended having serious issuess with the whole thing, especially concerning points made that particular traits never go away in a particular authors penmanship. Not only do aspects change fully, my own writing now looks nothing like earlier years.
Sadly, people boast of their prowess in catching liars and forgers based solely on their writing analysis but the real money is in the book sale.
JAIL JAMAICA LISA SNOWDON PORRIDGE COLLEGE ORDINARY NANA BING ADAPTER 70151009 Marcus Garvey Documentary Pt. 5 SEIKO 100M C I A SEKONDA 50metres GOOGLE
What if I like to have neat uniform handwriting and like to make a little loop in my letter "o" And it doesn't help that that is how they are teaching children to write o in cursive in schools.
@LaSalviaBodysurf No, I'm not. I just hate evolution. It's not science and it pisses me off. Besides, what's wrong with people who are Creationists, you judgmental prick?
@LaSalviaBodysurf See, evolution is a theory supported by other theories, which have been debunked. See, a living thing CAN NOT change beyond a certain point. This is a FACT we learned from the Agricultural experiments at the University of Wisconson in 1894. IT was covered up because it stepped on the toes of the evolutionist's little theory. Did you know they also tried covering up the discovery of the living Coelocanth? Good thing the media got to it first, or we'd think it's still extinct...
@lifeofanidiot about that alien thing, we can only prove that something exists, we cant prove that something doesnt. Little changes in a big time = huge change. We went a bit far from the handwriting topic..
This is science that she is teaching? Labeling something as science adds so much more credibility to an activity, especially if you are trying to sell snake oil. Well, I'm convinced! Evidence of this type is an infallible as DNA. I know! Why don't we use this type of conjecture to predict behavioral characteristics and give the government the ability to lock someone up without having been charged with or convicted of any crime. Best of all it can't be challenged as it lacks hard numbers.
@metalmike83 No, that's not true. The intelligence is not shown by the neatness of the handwriting. There are other signs to direct to the power of the mind. In fact, neatness may reveal that the person is methodical and characterized by clarity in thinking which might not necessarily be a deep or fast one.
@metalmike83 it doesn't mean like that ... they are tried of writing and many brands of the same medicine . which to choose, sometimes confused to select the best one for the patient.
they have physical frustration too... but if u see each prescription it will be in optimistic mood . sorry if i offended you .
I just looked at a handwritten paper of vocab words, I stabbed pretty much every one of my O's, and that's just from copying them from a dictionary. I must be lying. lol
I make a LOT of mistakes when I write, always have. I don't think I'm any more or less honest than the average person. The problem is, my brain thinks the words way faster than I can possibly write them. This leads to constant misspellings and writing the wrong words in the wrong places. Hell, I did it a few times writing this comment.
@losersalwayswin I read in my intro psych text that people with high IQ's actually have extremely poor handwriting. Of course, it's most likely a meaningless coorlation, but it does disprove this horseshit.
@apolloniavitelli yeah ... I have her book .. and in it .. she does state that her book is based on a particular writing style and that what we are taught in school affects it .. However, if we have enough of a sample to determine the style, then you can take that into account when you analyse .. Not an "exact" science .. but has proven useful more than not. Regardless of some peoples unsubstantiated comments. ( not yours )
@robingervais7 So you're implying that I should ignore everything I disagree with? Judge things without giving it a chance? That's not being very fair, and considering I called it a pseudoscience the very least I could do is give it the benefit of the doubt and watch the video.
@apolloniavitelli of course, some people may stab Os just because they were taught to. People studying this are aware of that, so they look at other letters and make a judgement based on how they write in a whole
@SaganAppreciationSoc Do you consider all of psychology then to be a pseudoscience? Handwriting is similar to other types of body language. Our handwriting is determined by our brains, not by our hands. There is a connection between the brain and the body, this idea is not new.
interesting,i am sure there is some truth to this,but this is just promotional material hence explaining its over simplification for example flamboyant writing could be an indicator of creativity/artistic rather than being a " con-artist".
The problem with this "analysis" is that she is writing everything. Now, if SHE can write all of these different handwritings in the same state (emotion-wise), then why can't someone else fake it just as easily?
Yeh they can but the idea is to let someone write something unconsciously.. in a relaxed state of mind and so reveal stuff.. the people writing stuff probably dont know theyre getting their handwriting analysed.
@Zarathustra314 Your probably the last person to understand what science really means. It means exploration, nothing more. There is no such thing as 'pseudo science' it either is science or it is not. Science isn't based upon debunking nor skepticism, but it's based upon an open mind. If people like you lived 500 years ago, science would still be in the hands of religion; because you seem to have a religious view about science.
@skyphor That is so wrong - the scientific method requires evidence, reliability, falsifiability, and testability. Graphology has failed all of these things. Furthermore, it goes against good thinking - another tenet of the scientific method. People who believe this shit are akin to religious fanatics who believe the earth is 6000 years old.
@metalmike83 Graphology has at least as much validity as the Rorschach Ink Blot test or the Thematic Apperception Test. Neither of those widely used psychological tests have passed the scientific evidence test. Neither Freud's theories nor Erikson's stages are falsifiable, yet they are still taught in your psychology classes.
@Zarathustra314 And so, people who carry out research that comes with it, are scientists. Not you arm-chair wannabee scientists. Because I can guarantee that no serious scientist goes to youtube and make preposterous comment on a friggin' video.
Calling graphology a science is batshit. Where's her data and research?
I don't think it's complete hogwash, but are we just supposed to trust the intuition of the people making these claims? Where's the proof that it works?
I have the wierdest handwriting. Even in print... I go over my letters alot but I don't know why... I'm not lying, it's just a habit I have... and if I write, I realize I have a stabbed O and I wasn't lying about what I was writing... does it just mean I have a guilty mind or what? I don't write in cursive that much but in my opinion my cursive is very plain and sucks... all of these type of analyzing sciences say I get into detail well... but in my opinion I suck with detail. Maybe I'm strange
I think there's a lot of bullshit into that, when I was in school I was taught in cursive, and we were taught to make a small stabbing circle within our 'o's. Does that make everyone who studies that handwriting a liar? Come on now... bullshit. Besides, graphology is a dead technique at any rate, people use the keyboard more than they do their handwriting.
Graphology is far from dead. People will always have to use handwriting for some applications. I'm wondering where you learned to write if, indeed, you were taught to make a stabbing circle in ovals. That's a system I've never heard of, and I've been in the field for more than 40 years.
Your previous learning experience on how to write letters doesn't matter. Here's the reason: Even though you are taught how to write letters properly, your handwriting CHANGES over time.
And of course, graphologists will require a person to WRITE, and not to type on a keyboard!! They will also, most likely, require a person to write in cursive form and not in print.
Be careful about changing bits of your handwriting. Handwriting reflects who you are inside, so it's important to work with a professional. If you change your handwriting without know what you're doing, it will affect the way you feel.
"It will affect the way you feel" ? "I've been in the field for more than 40 years"? What field is that? Voodoo? Psychology? And if you say teaching, then I suggest you go back to whatever university you graduated from, and ask for your money back. - Let the girl change her handwriting, it's her deal. Work with a profession, please.
overly styled writing is the bluffer! true
majawow 2 weeks ago
@gairabad There are good books and bad ones. M. L. Bunker taught his students NOT to "learn and remember", but to "learn, prove what you learned and then remember what you proved"
littlemikey1954 3 weeks ago
Hmm, much like the polygraph "expert".... Never submit to these State sanctioned hocus pocus tests.
guitarplayer4real 1 month ago
My father was a certified graphologist and "handwriting analyser" and he ended having serious issuess with the whole thing, especially concerning points made that particular traits never go away in a particular authors penmanship. Not only do aspects change fully, my own writing now looks nothing like earlier years.
Sadly, people boast of their prowess in catching liars and forgers based solely on their writing analysis but the real money is in the book sale.
Experts my ass.
guitarplayer4real 1 month ago
the 30 dislikes are the ones that found out they're crazy
jmanflex 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
JAIL JAMAICA LISA SNOWDON PORRIDGE COLLEGE ORDINARY NANA BING ADAPTER 70151009 Marcus Garvey Documentary Pt. 5 SEIKO 100M C I A SEKONDA 50metres GOOGLE
whotaughtyou 2 months ago
What if I like to have neat uniform handwriting and like to make a little loop in my letter "o" And it doesn't help that that is how they are teaching children to write o in cursive in schools.
sbutte231 2 months ago
by looking at your G's in hand writing, they can tell that u masterbate alot, hahaahah!!! 95% of u looked at your G's your all gay haha :D
HueJazzz 3 months ago
Why am I getting turned on by being in a classroom. I take online classes lol
jestman5 3 months ago
I read all of the comments in this video about it being bullshit and Imagination:
Yet, I see nobody saying this on videos about evolution.
It's the same shit.
Graphology: All you have are letters on the board.
You don't know what they were thinking/feeling when they were writing, let alone if they were mad or sad.
Evolution: All you have are bones in the ground. You don't know if that animal had babies, let alone if it had babies different from itself.
lifeofanidiot 3 months ago
@lifeofanidiot most stupid comment ever. Are you a creacionist ? LOL
LaSalviaBodysurf 2 months ago
@LaSalviaBodysurf No, I'm not. I just hate evolution. It's not science and it pisses me off. Besides, what's wrong with people who are Creationists, you judgmental prick?
And even more so, prove me wrong, I DARE you.
lifeofanidiot 2 months ago
@lifeofanidiot /watch?v=dK3O6KYPmEw&feature=related ohh yes baby, you just got served.
LaSalviaBodysurf 2 months ago
@LaSalviaBodysurf That'd own me if I were a creationist. :|
But see, there's a problem: that's no more proof for evolution than it is for Aliens coming down and bonding our chromosomes. :|
lifeofanidiot 2 months ago
@LaSalviaBodysurf See, evolution is a theory supported by other theories, which have been debunked. See, a living thing CAN NOT change beyond a certain point. This is a FACT we learned from the Agricultural experiments at the University of Wisconson in 1894. IT was covered up because it stepped on the toes of the evolutionist's little theory. Did you know they also tried covering up the discovery of the living Coelocanth? Good thing the media got to it first, or we'd think it's still extinct...
lifeofanidiot 2 months ago
@lifeofanidiot about that alien thing, we can only prove that something exists, we cant prove that something doesnt. Little changes in a big time = huge change. We went a bit far from the handwriting topic..
LaSalviaBodysurf 2 months ago
@LaSalviaBodysurf Yeah, but little changes stop at a certain point. This was already proven, but it was suppressed.
lifeofanidiot 2 months ago
And yes, we're pretty far off lol
lifeofanidiot 2 months ago
This is science that she is teaching? Labeling something as science adds so much more credibility to an activity, especially if you are trying to sell snake oil. Well, I'm convinced! Evidence of this type is an infallible as DNA. I know! Why don't we use this type of conjecture to predict behavioral characteristics and give the government the ability to lock someone up without having been charged with or convicted of any crime. Best of all it can't be challenged as it lacks hard numbers.
thetruthisoutthere32 3 months ago
1:21
WTF? Its not that serious...
Paperhouse81 4 months ago
Comment removed
Paperhouse81 4 months ago
Bahaha Richard Nixon was a perfect example.
jacobforlifeson 7 months ago
TY PSYCHICBRILL
psychicbrill 8 months ago
great presentation! thanks for posting!
uranusisnotfunny 9 months ago
I write better when im pissed outa my head.
SE4NZOR 11 months ago
If you found interesting then you might want to look into body language. Look up Paul Ekman, Desmond Morris, Dave Navarro, and Tonya Reiman.
camreeno360 1 year ago
@Tuberinio1949 Nah keep the dog collar so I can drag her round by it.
Metals999 1 year ago
This is all pretty interesting. You guys stuck in linguistics lab oughtta knock it off with the dumb blonde jokes already. She's hot and smart.
BenZeneProject 1 year ago
Handwriting can reveal intelligence? So what the neater your handwriting is the smarter you are? Doctors must be all retarded...
metalmike83 1 year ago 40
@metalmike83 No, that's not true. The intelligence is not shown by the neatness of the handwriting. There are other signs to direct to the power of the mind. In fact, neatness may reveal that the person is methodical and characterized by clarity in thinking which might not necessarily be a deep or fast one.
iughioo 1 year ago
@metalmike83 No, it doesn't go that straightforward... It has more to it...
Painnnnful 10 months ago
@metalmike83 If u read her book..the neater you write the worse it is. It shows too much control over urself without any self expression....
ninuchi 9 months ago
Comment removed
karthikp1981 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@metalmike83 it doesn't mean like that ... they are tried of writing and many brands of the same medicine . which to choose, sometimes confused to select the best one for the patient.
they have physical frustration too... but if u see each prescription it will be in optimistic mood . sorry if i offended you .
take care god bless
karthikp1981 8 months ago
@metalmike83
So I guess my IQ has gone down in the past decade, because my handwriting has gotten worse? :)
BhuvaneshB 5 months ago
I just looked at a handwritten paper of vocab words, I stabbed pretty much every one of my O's, and that's just from copying them from a dictionary. I must be lying. lol
TheScottishPole 1 year ago
Oh, no fair!
I wanted to see what the rest of my doodles mean!
ObeyBunny 1 year ago 2
interesting.
darkAngelLuna 1 year ago
man, this video is interesting!!! im gonna b a graphologist....
Squelzy 1 year ago 3
@apolloniavitelli That's why this is considered a pseudoscience at best.
hornetpalooza 1 year ago
I make a LOT of mistakes when I write, always have. I don't think I'm any more or less honest than the average person. The problem is, my brain thinks the words way faster than I can possibly write them. This leads to constant misspellings and writing the wrong words in the wrong places. Hell, I did it a few times writing this comment.
Krazyk007x2 1 year ago
Your IQ is not revealed in your handwriting lol
losersalwayswin 1 year ago
@losersalwayswin I read in my intro psych text that people with high IQ's actually have extremely poor handwriting. Of course, it's most likely a meaningless coorlation, but it does disprove this horseshit.
metalmike83 1 year ago
@apolloniavitelli yeah ... I have her book .. and in it .. she does state that her book is based on a particular writing style and that what we are taught in school affects it .. However, if we have enough of a sample to determine the style, then you can take that into account when you analyse .. Not an "exact" science .. but has proven useful more than not. Regardless of some peoples unsubstantiated comments. ( not yours )
N2CUA 1 year ago
I have used it at work to catch a liar .. Worked for me ..
Used it a a party .. four people ... four lies .. found them all ..
wow ... pretty impressive for a pseudoscience ..
Perhaps you are just to closed minded ...
N2CUA 1 year ago 4
@robingervais7 So you're implying that I should ignore everything I disagree with? Judge things without giving it a chance? That's not being very fair, and considering I called it a pseudoscience the very least I could do is give it the benefit of the doubt and watch the video.
olemortenm 1 year ago
@apolloniavitelli of course, some people may stab Os just because they were taught to. People studying this are aware of that, so they look at other letters and make a judgement based on how they write in a whole
taekneek 1 year ago
Handwriting analysis is pseudoscience.
SaganAppreciationSoc 1 year ago 3
@SaganAppreciationSoc
IF that is the case .. then OH YEAH! for pseudoscience.. Cuz it has caught many a criminal ..
N2CUA 1 year ago
@N2CUA
Judges and juries are often bamboozled by nonsense. Lie detectors are another utterly unreliable method often seen in courts.
SaganAppreciationSoc 1 year ago
@SaganAppreciationSoc Do you consider all of psychology then to be a pseudoscience? Handwriting is similar to other types of body language. Our handwriting is determined by our brains, not by our hands. There is a connection between the brain and the body, this idea is not new.
strawberryseason 1 year ago
Just another pathetic pseudoscience. I honestly feel sad when I think about that fact that there are still people who believe in stuff like this.
olemortenm 1 year ago
There's a time and a place to doodle.
BassistBob81 1 year ago 2
I draw a dick on my doodle test...hehe.
Deezhan 2 years ago
For what it's worth it is interesting to look at Barack Obama's signature considering the stabbing O.
Thisisnotmyrealname8 2 years ago
interesting,i am sure there is some truth to this,but this is just promotional material hence explaining its over simplification for example flamboyant writing could be an indicator of creativity/artistic rather than being a " con-artist".
davedroid 2 years ago
I agree.
DuffanyHero 2 years ago
The problem with this "analysis" is that she is writing everything. Now, if SHE can write all of these different handwritings in the same state (emotion-wise), then why can't someone else fake it just as easily?
paintedmusic 2 years ago
Yeh they can but the idea is to let someone write something unconsciously.. in a relaxed state of mind and so reveal stuff.. the people writing stuff probably dont know theyre getting their handwriting analysed.
leeshjackson 2 years ago 3
Hey! No fair! I wanted to see what all of those doodles meant!
What does the diagnal one mean?
ObeyBunny 2 years ago
Why isn't there any ...NEW graphologist videos? I wanna be a graphologist when i grow up plz thnk u bi
SpoonsForks 2 years ago 4
most empirical studies fail to show the validity claimed by its supporters. Graphology is now generally considered a pseudoscience
sn4tchflick 2 years ago 3
i write stabbed o's because i find it fancy!
Iwishyouallwell 2 years ago 4
Me too. I do a lot of big ovals and decorations because I think it's pretty.
PopMami 2 years ago
its nordic if you mean this letter "Ø"
In Denmark and Norway we have those letters as "Æ,Ø,Å"
HoracePL 2 years ago
Can anyone say: Pseudoscience?
Zarathustra314 3 years ago 4
It's polite to call this pseudoscience. :-)
I think VegSource hurts its credibility by having this video in their collection.
SaganAppreciationSoc 2 years ago
@Zarathustra314 Your probably the last person to understand what science really means. It means exploration, nothing more. There is no such thing as 'pseudo science' it either is science or it is not. Science isn't based upon debunking nor skepticism, but it's based upon an open mind. If people like you lived 500 years ago, science would still be in the hands of religion; because you seem to have a religious view about science.
skyphor 1 year ago
@skyphor That is so wrong - the scientific method requires evidence, reliability, falsifiability, and testability. Graphology has failed all of these things. Furthermore, it goes against good thinking - another tenet of the scientific method. People who believe this shit are akin to religious fanatics who believe the earth is 6000 years old.
metalmike83 1 year ago
@metalmike83 Graphology has at least as much validity as the Rorschach Ink Blot test or the Thematic Apperception Test. Neither of those widely used psychological tests have passed the scientific evidence test. Neither Freud's theories nor Erikson's stages are falsifiable, yet they are still taught in your psychology classes.
strawberryseason 1 year ago
@Zarathustra314 And so, people who carry out research that comes with it, are scientists. Not you arm-chair wannabee scientists. Because I can guarantee that no serious scientist goes to youtube and make preposterous comment on a friggin' video.
skyphor 1 year ago
Calling graphology a science is batshit. Where's her data and research?
I don't think it's complete hogwash, but are we just supposed to trust the intuition of the people making these claims? Where's the proof that it works?
Cosmodot256 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
How the HELL is this 17mins long? the time limit for movies is 9:59.... damn the youtube admins gotta look at this video -.-
Exorcism99 3 years ago
It's Possible Exorcism. There was an 2 hour video on Nasa on Youtube.
Soul886 3 years ago
Because it's a director account.
smellslikechildren1 2 years ago
WHAT THE HELL EVER.
kellyismine88 3 years ago
She's pulling back and disguising that turkey neck.
Gobble, Gobble
suckfist 3 years ago
Lol 3:37-3:39..
bagelfanatic 3 years ago
I have the wierdest handwriting. Even in print... I go over my letters alot but I don't know why... I'm not lying, it's just a habit I have... and if I write, I realize I have a stabbed O and I wasn't lying about what I was writing... does it just mean I have a guilty mind or what? I don't write in cursive that much but in my opinion my cursive is very plain and sucks... all of these type of analyzing sciences say I get into detail well... but in my opinion I suck with detail. Maybe I'm strange
Remembrance1692 3 years ago
Thank you for sharing your video I think its a great positive and fun way to learn.
Im into graphology also.
Have a nice day
nlpcenter 3 years ago
if your AANNNNNNNNGRY. LOL
chad5161 3 years ago 4
thank you for sharing :) i enjoyed !
onnwai2 3 years ago
does this only work for ppl that write in cursive? 'cause i don't write in cursive at all.
boelvira 3 years ago
No. It doesn't work for people who write in print or in cursive.
fielsjd 3 years ago
it's worked for my friends but they write in cursive. i asked someone else and they said it doesn't work with print or with just someone's signature
boelvira 3 years ago
the teacher has a great personality, wish i had more teachers like that, maybe I would retain more!!!
BlackMasterJoe89 3 years ago
I think there's a lot of bullshit into that, when I was in school I was taught in cursive, and we were taught to make a small stabbing circle within our 'o's. Does that make everyone who studies that handwriting a liar? Come on now... bullshit. Besides, graphology is a dead technique at any rate, people use the keyboard more than they do their handwriting.
Adahn5 3 years ago
Graphology is far from dead. People will always have to use handwriting for some applications. I'm wondering where you learned to write if, indeed, you were taught to make a stabbing circle in ovals. That's a system I've never heard of, and I've been in the field for more than 40 years.
sheilalowe 3 years ago
Your previous learning experience on how to write letters doesn't matter. Here's the reason: Even though you are taught how to write letters properly, your handwriting CHANGES over time.
And of course, graphologists will require a person to WRITE, and not to type on a keyboard!! They will also, most likely, require a person to write in cursive form and not in print.
ilovesamsungverymuch 3 years ago
is it possible to change your handwriting? i hate mine, its ugly and messy.
LilMissae 3 years ago
Be careful about changing bits of your handwriting. Handwriting reflects who you are inside, so it's important to work with a professional. If you change your handwriting without know what you're doing, it will affect the way you feel.
Sheila Lowe
sheilalowe 3 years ago
"It will affect the way you feel" ? "I've been in the field for more than 40 years"? What field is that? Voodoo? Psychology? And if you say teaching, then I suggest you go back to whatever university you graduated from, and ask for your money back. - Let the girl change her handwriting, it's her deal. Work with a profession, please.
Adahn5 3 years ago
Excellent stuff!
colopity 4 years ago
UPLOAD MORE ANDREA'S VIDEOS!!! O_O please!!!
begging!!!
kenshinlucy 4 years ago 3
This video is really interesting. :]
meeeee1991 4 years ago
interesting
rachelxisxaxdancer 4 years ago
Great Video!
prekshachakravarti 4 years ago