That is why many try to discredit him, he lifts the veil of what it means to abide by the Constitution. It means spending within your means, following the rule of law, and defending your country at its borders, not halfway around the world.
It's so common for those who support Ron Paul to say " his going to honor our Consititution" in place of facts. Let's try to read between the lines, instead of only seeing what benefit your own situation. I know that you don't want others to suffer because your unwilling to see. Think it over and reread all about Ron Paul.
Specifics? I didn't think so. The facts speak for themselves: his votes show that he defends the Constitution. He voted against "authority" to use force in Iraq, because the Constitution requires a declaration of war to invade a country and occupy it for years and perhaps decades.
Look for yourself at his speech during the vote, it will be clear to you then. Thank you
News flash idiot...every president has promised to revive/defend the constitution. And rather you look into it or not there are quite a few things that make your saint into a mire mortal. I can't believe people are so easily swayed by the same words without looking up the canidates background. I honestly feel sorry for surface readers and those who don't read between the lines.
name-calling again... sigh...FYI, I have looked into it, and what is different about Ron Paul is the fact that he actually believes what he says when he talks about honoring the Constitution. Look at his voting record. The reason he votes alone so often, is because he is bound by the Constitution, and what it allows Congress, and ultimately government to do.
He has been unwavering in his defense of the Constitution. If you don't know this, then you are making empty, uninformed comments, and I ask you to stop. Otherwise, explain why you think he isn't genuine.
But just like the Federal Govt. "No child Left behind" shouldn't be tossed aside because of mistakes made. It should be fixed or repaired. Every canidate has his or now her own team and their job is to make them seem as convincing as possible to claim their prize. It is not a suprise to me to hear someone say they want to honor the Constitution to get "votes of course." Otherwise really he has nothing really making him shine in the public eye.
Perhaps you have been disillusioned from so many candidates who claim to defend the Constitution, who when in office walk all over it. I am with you. But when I really looked at Ron Paul and his policies, as well as his record, I thought, wow, finally the real deal.
I disagree with you about No Child Left Behind. I live in Japan, and I have seen what teaching to tests produces. Children who are good at multiple choice. Life is not multiple choice. Also, federal involvement is not necessary in education: cities and states have been doing well for centuries.
Just like he voted against the 84 mil. from African-American college or maybe the one on a women's right to abortion.Or maybe we should talk about his policies instead and how it will destroy peoples lives. Honoring it how, by his own interpretation, by isolating our military power, by letting states run things, by letting kids be left behind for a better education, or by keeping us dependent on welfare because their job only gives them a profit of 10-25 per month.
He voted against many things- things that aren't the fedeal government's responsibility to deal with. I think about 99% of teachers are with him on "No child left behind" by the way. Welfare issue: he wants to get rid of the thing hurting poor people the most- inflation. Please do your homework before you jump to conclusions.
So which is it! The states... are you kidding me. You know as well as I that if the state goverment were to get that much power,it would lead to a divide in the US. The same shit that was going on during the civil rights movement will come to flueition in most states. It's no wonder White Nationalist support him. Yes, as it sets not being changed "No kid left behind" is a flop.
You are saying that getting rid of the federal government's role in education and medicine will affect civil rights? Hardly.
If you know his platform, you'd know that the only role of federal government is to protect the individual from attacks from others, foreign or domestic. The libertarian message holds no room for racism or bias, since the foundation of the individual rights is on their character.
get real man! Do you seriously that nieve to think it won't happen? You seem to forget the incedent that happened in the News only a few years ago. I forget what specific state it was, but it tried to pass a law promoting a segration within that state. So again I say that it will come to pass if federal govt isn't allowed to regulate such things. And that quote is the same I took when I was in the military. That's the militaries job, the president just signs the paper.
Oh and social security...well I hope you like taking care of your parents and grandparents because there will be no cushion for you now. That's unless you throw you elders out in the street. Poor get poorer,Middle class become lower class,Rich will become either richer or become Middle class.
what? nonsense. You obviously know nothing about Ron Paul. His cuts in spending will actually save social security, genius.
And his getting rid of the inflation on the dollar will actually do the opposite of what you say. The poor and middle class will retain their wealth, and there will be steady ameliorization of the disparity of wealth.
No you obviously do nothing more than a surface reader and a nieve person. Since your on YT all the time check out the WN channel on YT. And then tell me that he doesn't represent WN's. Also your not much of a critical thinker either, because if you were than you would have read between the lines and looked at the long term effect of his policies.
Well, your spin rivals Fox "news", I suggest you send them your resume, you'd be a fine addition. Let me tell you who he represents, the individual. It's funny that you challenge my critical thinking, when you obviously haven't thought of the "long-term effects" of the status-quo, or you'd know that Ron Paul is necessary. The long-term effects of his policies are precisely why I like Ron Paul. Do yourself a favor, and get informed.
Just what I would expect from a Ron Paul supporter. I don't even watch TV for that matter. I follow my internet sources and those posted from YT. I am quite informed on your "savior" MR or MRS. You must like terrorising FOX NEWS..yeah I saw that one too. Is this what I should expect from RP supporters? I guess so. Thanks you proved my point.IDIOT!
Figures that you don't counter my points, you just call me names. Don't post on MY video unless you have something of value to say. I enjoy debate, but what you provide is ill-informed "spin". You have nothing on which to base your opinions. Please read up, and then post again with something substantial.
Well there is the video on Youtube that clearly shows RON Paul supports attacking a Fox News reporter. Oh, maybe you want me to say" Ron Paul is the defender of the constitution"..."he's the only one who can straight out America." Sorry, but I will not disreguard other's or what I've read to follow a man blindfolded. If you can't handle it then don't boardcast on YT.
And he will support WN's point's of view and make laws accordingly.WN's(White national=conservative group of racist similar to the KKK/neo-nazi/white pride/and thechurch of the creator groups) Ron Paul=no education for the poor,no college loans,no abortion rights,no safety net for earthquakes or Floods etc and eventual total segragation of US.
When will the rest wake up?..It's our responsiblity to wake them up...It's time we earn our right to be here....Join meetup groups..hold signs...campaign..educate yourself to the best of your ability... but most important,get in the streets get active!!
That is why many try to discredit him, he lifts the veil of what it means to abide by the Constitution. It means spending within your means, following the rule of law, and defending your country at its borders, not halfway around the world.
wils5742 4 years ago
It's so common for those who support Ron Paul to say " his going to honor our Consititution" in place of facts. Let's try to read between the lines, instead of only seeing what benefit your own situation. I know that you don't want others to suffer because your unwilling to see. Think it over and reread all about Ron Paul.
fishgut677 4 years ago
Specifics? I didn't think so. The facts speak for themselves: his votes show that he defends the Constitution. He voted against "authority" to use force in Iraq, because the Constitution requires a declaration of war to invade a country and occupy it for years and perhaps decades.
Look for yourself at his speech during the vote, it will be clear to you then. Thank you
wils5742 4 years ago
Donate today! It's bomb day
wils5742 4 years ago
News flash idiot...every president has promised to revive/defend the constitution. And rather you look into it or not there are quite a few things that make your saint into a mire mortal. I can't believe people are so easily swayed by the same words without looking up the canidates background. I honestly feel sorry for surface readers and those who don't read between the lines.
fishgut677 4 years ago
name-calling again... sigh...FYI, I have looked into it, and what is different about Ron Paul is the fact that he actually believes what he says when he talks about honoring the Constitution. Look at his voting record. The reason he votes alone so often, is because he is bound by the Constitution, and what it allows Congress, and ultimately government to do.
wils5742 4 years ago
He has been unwavering in his defense of the Constitution. If you don't know this, then you are making empty, uninformed comments, and I ask you to stop. Otherwise, explain why you think he isn't genuine.
wils5742 4 years ago
But just like the Federal Govt. "No child Left behind" shouldn't be tossed aside because of mistakes made. It should be fixed or repaired. Every canidate has his or now her own team and their job is to make them seem as convincing as possible to claim their prize. It is not a suprise to me to hear someone say they want to honor the Constitution to get "votes of course." Otherwise really he has nothing really making him shine in the public eye.
fishgut677 4 years ago
Perhaps you have been disillusioned from so many candidates who claim to defend the Constitution, who when in office walk all over it. I am with you. But when I really looked at Ron Paul and his policies, as well as his record, I thought, wow, finally the real deal.
wils5742 4 years ago
I disagree with you about No Child Left Behind. I live in Japan, and I have seen what teaching to tests produces. Children who are good at multiple choice. Life is not multiple choice. Also, federal involvement is not necessary in education: cities and states have been doing well for centuries.
wils5742 4 years ago
Just like he voted against the 84 mil. from African-American college or maybe the one on a women's right to abortion.Or maybe we should talk about his policies instead and how it will destroy peoples lives. Honoring it how, by his own interpretation, by isolating our military power, by letting states run things, by letting kids be left behind for a better education, or by keeping us dependent on welfare because their job only gives them a profit of 10-25 per month.
fishgut677 4 years ago
He voted against many things- things that aren't the fedeal government's responsibility to deal with. I think about 99% of teachers are with him on "No child left behind" by the way. Welfare issue: he wants to get rid of the thing hurting poor people the most- inflation. Please do your homework before you jump to conclusions.
wils5742 4 years ago
So which is it! The states... are you kidding me. You know as well as I that if the state goverment were to get that much power,it would lead to a divide in the US. The same shit that was going on during the civil rights movement will come to flueition in most states. It's no wonder White Nationalist support him. Yes, as it sets not being changed "No kid left behind" is a flop.
fishgut677 4 years ago
You are saying that getting rid of the federal government's role in education and medicine will affect civil rights? Hardly.
If you know his platform, you'd know that the only role of federal government is to protect the individual from attacks from others, foreign or domestic. The libertarian message holds no room for racism or bias, since the foundation of the individual rights is on their character.
wils5742 4 years ago
get real man! Do you seriously that nieve to think it won't happen? You seem to forget the incedent that happened in the News only a few years ago. I forget what specific state it was, but it tried to pass a law promoting a segration within that state. So again I say that it will come to pass if federal govt isn't allowed to regulate such things. And that quote is the same I took when I was in the military. That's the militaries job, the president just signs the paper.
fishgut677 4 years ago
Oh and social security...well I hope you like taking care of your parents and grandparents because there will be no cushion for you now. That's unless you throw you elders out in the street. Poor get poorer,Middle class become lower class,Rich will become either richer or become Middle class.
fishgut677 4 years ago
what? nonsense. You obviously know nothing about Ron Paul. His cuts in spending will actually save social security, genius.
And his getting rid of the inflation on the dollar will actually do the opposite of what you say. The poor and middle class will retain their wealth, and there will be steady ameliorization of the disparity of wealth.
wils5742 4 years ago
No you obviously do nothing more than a surface reader and a nieve person. Since your on YT all the time check out the WN channel on YT. And then tell me that he doesn't represent WN's. Also your not much of a critical thinker either, because if you were than you would have read between the lines and looked at the long term effect of his policies.
fishgut677 4 years ago
Well, your spin rivals Fox "news", I suggest you send them your resume, you'd be a fine addition. Let me tell you who he represents, the individual. It's funny that you challenge my critical thinking, when you obviously haven't thought of the "long-term effects" of the status-quo, or you'd know that Ron Paul is necessary. The long-term effects of his policies are precisely why I like Ron Paul. Do yourself a favor, and get informed.
wils5742 4 years ago
Just what I would expect from a Ron Paul supporter. I don't even watch TV for that matter. I follow my internet sources and those posted from YT. I am quite informed on your "savior" MR or MRS. You must like terrorising FOX NEWS..yeah I saw that one too. Is this what I should expect from RP supporters? I guess so. Thanks you proved my point.IDIOT!
fishgut677 4 years ago
Figures that you don't counter my points, you just call me names. Don't post on MY video unless you have something of value to say. I enjoy debate, but what you provide is ill-informed "spin". You have nothing on which to base your opinions. Please read up, and then post again with something substantial.
wils5742 4 years ago
Well there is the video on Youtube that clearly shows RON Paul supports attacking a Fox News reporter. Oh, maybe you want me to say" Ron Paul is the defender of the constitution"..."he's the only one who can straight out America." Sorry, but I will not disreguard other's or what I've read to follow a man blindfolded. If you can't handle it then don't boardcast on YT.
fishgut677 4 years ago
And he will support WN's point's of view and make laws accordingly.WN's(White national=conservative group of racist similar to the KKK/neo-nazi/white pride/and thechurch of the creator groups) Ron Paul=no education for the poor,no college loans,no abortion rights,no safety net for earthquakes or Floods etc and eventual total segragation of US.
fishgut677 4 years ago
wake up people!
splendidyouth 4 years ago
Good work
t0kt0k 4 years ago
When will the rest wake up?..It's our responsiblity to wake them up...It's time we earn our right to be here....Join meetup groups..hold signs...campaign..educate yourself to the best of your ability... but most important,get in the streets get active!!
bar730 4 years ago
It's the constitution stupid! Nice!
Ostlund 4 years ago 2
I'm also an ex-dem ex-indy going repub for Dr. Paul, For freedom, for the people, for America!
getenlightened 4 years ago 2
I want this on TV in all states. NOW>
frater0 4 years ago
NICE
huskersforever 4 years ago
YES!! It has to be about PRINCIPLES NOT PARTY this election.... it just HAS to be... I'm a dem that registered repub to vote for Dr. Ron Paul..
Its the Constitution stupid@!
atvdude1000 4 years ago 3
STRONG
coachkemp34 4 years ago
Loved it. Thank you.
dbarsell 4 years ago
Easy choice! Ron Paul 2008!
patriot4paul 4 years ago
AWSOME
jessejames444 4 years ago