Added: 2 years ago
From: arirangnews
Views: 273,249
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,114)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • lets sink it....

  • shit mmm yes very shit uk rule the waves not much to defend strategic

  • Skipper has a nice Elvis haircut.

  • 2:09 Randing craft lol

  • Was it made by Samsung too?

  • but the chinese shoot north korean defectors on sight as they swim the channel. so exactly who are they planning on attacking by sea?

  • Can they make HELICOPTERS too?

  • Can't even finish watching this.

    I'm wondering when north Korea is going to realize it's China's bitch.

  • It's a light helichopter carrier only 14 000 Tons compare to USA 98 000 Ton Nimitz class carriers. Compared to third world navies they are advance, compare to western navies they don't even come close.

  • @EkaterinaRukovskaya Korea doesnt need a big carrier cuz they only covers 400,000 sq km of the sea, and that doesnt mean Korea cannot make Aircraft Carrier except for radar and control system. That country is quite advanced.

  • Ty for uploading even though theres plenty of propaganda involved :)

  • I wonder if Joe Satriani got paid for them using his music in this video.

  • A lot of American made equiptment in this video. Been on quite a few. SEMPER FI

  • this is a joke right ??? every time American or western weapons have faced off against their soviet or Chinese counterparts. and the west has thumped em :)

  • Only 5 choppers?

  • Only 5 choppers?

  • Only 5 choppers?

  • lol @ Korea's Elvis

  • @dantheman9758 haha I was thinking it was Bono

  • Very useful for many missions, assault to antisub to patrol. Jets would be nice, but a very useful ship for dealing with whoever they might end up facing in a battle.

  • Isn't any ship that has battle capability a battle ship? In the US we would call them combat ships. The translation might be off a bit but we shouldn't get stuck on minutia. We should be concerned with Japan , Korea and China all building combat ships at a frenzied pace.

  • LMAO 2:08 subtitles-> Randing

    

  • that is not a battleship. Its an assualt carrier

  • Isn't this just an ambitious ship, maybe added a few more minor weapons on it? (more Torpedoes Ect). No long range missles and heavy guns. Not really a battleship. Its just an Ambitious ship! They are over exagerating its power!

  • To be fair, the narration refers to it as a battleship also.

  • largest ' target '

    

  • Now let's terrorist attack North and South to make them fight each others.

  • Thats a really impressive assault ship with great strike options but 5 helicopters on that massive flight deck.You could easily manage 15 on that deck.A couple of chinooks and 4 apaches would be nice!!

  • lol comparing this to russia aircraft carrier killer this korean really need to know their enemy

  • Se alguem entender o que estou dizendo me responde ? kkkkkkkk

  • This is not battle ship.

    ただの強襲揚陸艦が戦艦だって?

    艦種が違うよ。

  • Guys, this is a HELICOPTER CARRIER

    the uploader probably didnt know english and just called it a battleship by mistake.

    no need to hate...and certainly no need for all of these shitty japanese haters wtf

  • @SirHungryHippo

    you beat me to it.

    LOL

  • @SirHungryHippo All naval military vessels which carry weapons are BATTLE-ships, even submersibles, and all naval ships which carry aircraft are aircraft carriers! YES, heliocopters ARE aircraft! They fly, don't they?

  • @SirHungryHippo it is a battle ship

  • @SirHungryHippo

    1) The comentator (who sounds american) called it a battleship ...

    2) Korea != Japan

    But no hate ;o)

  • Dokdo is not the biggest ship of asia, it's half the size of indian INS viraat

  • another country waiting for the F35...another country fucked by USA military system...

  • @bingofioul so as Japan, being nuke 60 years ago and now act as a puppet of the US in asia.

  • One of these babies with a King Sejong Destroyer and a couple of other KDX-I and KDX-II ships and a LST makes for a nice amphibious strike group.

  • who u gona stern gate with that Dokdo ? Elvis

  • Scary Chinks

  • @Owned123fable You should fix your British teeth, so you wont scare people every time you smile.

  • Wonder where they got the money, and parts, and the helicopters, and probably the planes.... The United States

  • WOW.....!!!!

  • monkey koreans made a crap hyundai ship and named it dokdo lmfao

  • Comment removed

  • なんで朝鮮人って真似しかできねえんだ?なんでも日本の後追いや­ないか

  • Also, this ship isn't even qualified to be a CV, it's just an AAV.

  • Bigger the ship, bigger the target!

  • @sal7va7dor But usually the bigger the ship, the tougher they are lol.

  • @liamdudeeee this only applies to pre-WWII ships. Today, a ship this big is a perfect target for bombers and missiles.

  • @tooichan: Which is why any fleet commander with half a brain wouldn't send it out alone into a dangerous situation. It would be escorted by AAW and ASW vessels, and preferably have air cover too. It wasn't intended to be a CV, but it probably could be converted into one if SK bought the F35B. Otherwise it will have to rely on air cover from land or from allied carriers. Still could play a useful role as part of a task force though.

  • North Korea is best Korea!

  • 4m(15ft)の波で、出港不可能な軍艦。

    一方、70年以上前に、台風も訓練だと太平洋上に留まった大日本­帝国艦隊。

    韓国?その当時は大日本帝国でしたよ?

  • this is to kick north korean ass

  • Lol fucking japanese are scared tha fuck out

  • The first.... Americans made a battleship a lot

  • INS VIRAAT IS TWICE THE SIZE OF Dokdo..what a liar channel

  • こんなモノで自衛隊に勝とうとか笑わせるな

    お前らは、勘違いして舞い上がっているだけだぞ

    今は韓国マンセーしてる民主党とか言う売国奴に政権取られている­からのうのうとしていられるんだからな

    いざ戦争となった時泣きつくんじゃねえぞ人モドキ共

  • I don't know why they call it a battleship but it does look like a real nice multirole amphibious assault/sea control ship. this guy with the sunglasses and open collared shirt looks funny as hell.

  • 韓国さんよ・・・・自衛隊はいつでも相手になってやるから、喧嘩­したくなったら遠慮はいらないぜ(笑)。

    まぁ、そん時はこの船程度は海の藻屑にしてやるけどな!

    

  • north korea mos def

  • Amphibious Landing Ship. Warship? Yes. Battleship? No.

  • @dunrudin: Probably an error in translation; I doubt English is this guy's first language. Of course there are no true battleships left in service with any navy in the world. This is a nice ship though and probably could be turned into a useful light fixed-wing carrier if SK were to invest in the F35B.

  • They should host a football match on there! :)

  • it is not the biggest

  • tungeremete aah gzzuardo eihs! hahahaha lol xD

  • china is stong hold to our old ways - i dont exactly agree what happend with north korea

    - i do know china will rule favorible -china no ones!! forget but china knows - she is r favor figher n we have alotta running along side her....

  • North n South wann be so fucking diffrent- South made decision and thay r in a vacume of tecknowlodgy - North are in a vacume themselfs- We have our place as a research and Development - Hopfully you can become one of us!! but boath russian and chinease can fish out a bullshiter !!! highly classified games we all play!! but, shouldnt we all be as one??fuck yer dictatorship and fuck yer power as a whole?? we need you and your power as a whole

  • South knows better what happened to their brother in the north-and south still benafits from the help, North probably dies after a visit to another communist country-china-? either way china and north can colaborate and ready a army quicker then the USA - We got better "shit" but, if we were are under immedate attack, it would be our "communist countrys" on of the the Defence!! we need to equip them!! u think im wrong then yer stupid! we need to keep developing we need to understand n defend eac

  • Old propaganda? -North is under new leadship and is due for a change, here it would seem we are dealing the same "old cards". I would like to see north join with south, like germany! No more referring to them as "THEM". Ide like it to be "us". We are varnishing them to play the same old role as before! Let's not put em into a mold this time,let em find themselfs- Be it psychology to make us quicker and better reactive communitys. we still have alot to learn why r thay the way thay r? no kill-!!

  • calm down^^

  • i love korean prostitutes in flushing ny

  • you might have meant "warship" not battleship(BB)... this is like a modern escort carrier(CV), that carries a lot of marines.

  • Might not look like a battleship  however this thing whatever it is can sink any battleship ever made with out even seeing the target

  • @Cantankerous65 It cant sink Gundam.....

  • @Cantankerous65 Trident could sink this without any trouble. Oh, and destroy several nations in the process.

  • @CysicSystems If you are talking about a Sub well I said any Battleship ever made 0_o

  • @Cantankerous65 What about space battleship Yamato? I bet it can't destroy Yamato.

  • @JustineBieberxoxo Your right it's at the bottom of the ocean!

  • Big but inside are empty. Show Off and talk only, no action.

  • this is a helicopter carrier or whatever but it doesn't carry aircraft.

  • its a small wasp class lph not a battle ship the last battle ship was built in the 40s

  • This is an aircraft carrier, where is the battleship? And what kind of aircraft carrier can only carry 5 aircraft? Well I am sorry Korea, but this ship will not meet my specifications. I am going to Russia and ordering one from them.:)

  • @turgeo2004 you are so wrong br0, that is not an aircraft carrier, that is the battleship ;) those 5 aircraft are meant to fool the enemies, its the disguise. that is the real deal, koreans have already developed the invisibility technology, so the actual size of the battleship is much bigger, with tens of thousands of laser turrets and millions of missiles that are faster than the speed of light. Please do not give this information to any third party.

  • @xilitol Excellent man!!.... Too funny!!

  • Aa battle ship its a assault ship... Battleship's are big gunned heavily armored warship designed to fire shells at enemy targets. Assault ship well thats what they described a moblie platform for aircraft and assault troops

  • Biggest=heavy slow easy target

  • IGN Yamato-biggest battleship

  • 5 aircraft is just wayyy too loow.. anyway.. people can keep secrets :3

  • 5 aircraft.... wtf. I would have expected around 40.

  • Very interesting video about the Republic of Korea's Navy. Better than call this ship a "battleship", which brings up notions of former battleships with guns, it would be better to call it a "warship", and a powerful and impressive one indeed. Congratulations to Korea, which was the first country to produce an armored ship, as I believe in the 16th or 17th century.

  • Wow what a beautiful battleship with its flight deck and no turrets with large caliber guns........

  • Fuck you Jap monkey we sank the Yamato fucker

  • @tank5723.... yeah and VC kicked your butt LMFAO

  • Takeshima is Japanese Territory.

  • In reality, Korea refused to send this matter to the ICJ. However Korea, with joint effort of the public and private sectors, are actively promoting “Dokdo is Korean territory” campaigns all over the world.

    It’s peculier and extraordinary that Korea is busy appealing to the world saying “Dokdo is Korean territory”, but at the same time refusing to appear in the ICJ which is considered the best place in the world to appeal in.

  • However much Korea insists that “Dokdo (small islets in dispute) is Korean territory”, as long as Japan doesn’t recognize those claims are legitimate historically nor International law-wise, this means the disputes over the islets are not settled between the countries yet, so Korea must put up and apper before the judge of the ICJ if it is to solve this problem peacefully.

  • If they abide by the principle of the sovereign equality, Korea has a legitimate right to reject sending the matter to the ICJ (International Court of Justice). However, since considering war as a means of settling international disputes is, in practice, prohibited, I think it’s not a bad idea to demand a judgement of a third party over an international disputes that have never been resolved thorough diplomatic negotiations.

  • Raged radioactive zombies... LOLz

  • need more and better ship

  • ヘリは海軍仕様じゃないから塩害にやられる。就航して正式にヘリ­が配属されるのは8年後。驚くべき活用法、レーダーは死角があり­一瞬目標を失う。機銃は味方撃ちする可能性がある。さすが韓国。­

  • its small and slow ,.and.that presenter looks like a right twat.

  • 空母じゃないから大げさしないでくれ

  • 中国新聞社など中国メディアは15日、竹島が日本の領土であり、­根拠はサンフランシスコ条約とする、武正公一外務副大臣の衆議院­外務委員会における発言を報じた。

  • will the korean and japanese fight already, im tire of waiting, i wanna see them killing each other LOL

  • This looks like a fine ship and Koreans can be proud of it.

  • Comunist Korea!

    

  • There are no battleships in operation today. this is an amphibious assault ship. The last "Battleship" was decommisioned in 1990. This is a large Warship but in no way a "Battleship" as it has no large caliber main guns.

  • @desertprovost

    shut up. It's just the name you fool. Today no-one is gonna build bigass ship like Bismarck or Yamato.

  • @KatiushaVN4 yeah nothing will be like the yamoto bismarch or lexington

  • @KatiushaVN4

    You shut up. The name battleship only applies to armored big gun ships of days gone by. The name should not be used loosely, or there will be a whole generation of idiots like you screwing up the nomenclature. We owe to those who follow to get it right and post correct material. The only fool is you dipshit.

  • @fergster11

    I bet your age is nearly 60

  • @KatiushaVN4

    No, I'm in my mid-forties. Age is irrelevant when it comes to correctness. Being young is not a reason to be ignorant on any subject. The knowledge is available, just look it up. Have a happy New Year.

  • @fergster11

    Usually, people who were born before, during or a little after WW2 have a tendency to stick with old school. For example, battleship in their mind is something with the size over 200 metre long that equipped with 8-inch diameter cannons. Well, today, no-one makes such huge cannons anymore because now they have missiles which are a lot more accurate and can travel a hundred times farther than the old cannon's bullets. Thus, today ships can be called "battleship"

  • @KatiushaVN4

    NO. The term Battleship applies to ships of the line, big gunned, armored, and designed to slug it out with one another. You are speaking of guided missle cruisers and frigates which cannot slug it out. Ask any naval historian or service member. Your confused, all the Battleships are gone, and no ship today can be or is classified as a Battleship. 8 inch gunned ships were classified as heavy cruisers.

  • @KatiushaVN4

    Also, we are going by undeniable Naval designations, not old school or new. No navy in the world classifies any ship as a Battleship any longer. Why do you insist on arguing a point in which your wrong? Once again, you don't know what your talking about, educate yourself.

  • @KatiushaVN4

    Your example shows your ignorance, "battlship in their mind is something with the size over 200 metre long that equipped with 8-inch diameter cannons," anyone with any knowledge would classify your example as a heavy cruiser.

  • @KatiushaVN4 There are no battleships in commission any more, they are obsolete now due to advancement in tech, as you mentioned, and in air power.

  • @KatiushaVN4 what the hell your talkin about?battleship is a class of ship.just like you called a ship carrying aircraft AIRCRAFT CARRIER,or ship carry Missile MISSILE DESTRO or CRUISER defends on weight.we dont call our destroyer BATTLESHIP.and dont argue to us its old school classification cuz we STILL use that classifi today with diff.only with missile.just what fergster said educate your self so in time NK attack you again in your shores you dont mistake a fishing boat with AK47 battleship.

  • @KatiushaVN4 I ROFL'd at your ignorance. You obviously have little to no idea on what defines a battleship and what defines a modern destroyer. And a battleship's main guns' ammunition aren't called 'bullets' - they're called shells. There's a difference. Battleships are also far slower and less maneuverable than destroyers - which form the backbone of surface fleets today.

  • Wow !! It worked great from Korea. Long live the South Korean superpower in Asia.

  • korea never was a seafaring nation. they have very basic descriptions for ships, unlike in english which thanks to british seapower have things like destroyers, frigates, cruisers (light & heavy), battle cruisers, battle ships and aircraftcarriers.

    koreans have merchant ships and battle ships, which means ships built for war. juntoohum is directly translated into english as battle ship. but not in the english sense.

  • Koreans say always in this way. 1:Korea is the most strongest country in the world. 2:Korea is the most oldest country in the world. 3:Korean is the most smart people in the world. 4:Korea is the most ~ 5:Korea is th ~ 6:Korea is ~ 7:Kore ~ 8:Ko ~ 〜continues eternally. And Japanese and Chinese say to Koreans in this way. 「Year,You are most excellent in the universe. 」 Then, Koreans are satisfied. Pls try it. without laughing.
  • Monkeys go to the 2ch

  • That's a FUCKING aircraft carrier or a floating helipad. Battleship is something way different

  • It looks more like a carrier than a battleship to me. It doesn't have the offensive like a battleship. It doesn't even have an actual offensive weapon system like a battleship should have. Not even a basic Anti ship missile launcher that is found in almost all ship. The only armament it has is 2 CIWS and RAM, which are for anti aircraft purposes. Unless they decided to place tanks on the deck and use them as the ship's main gun.

  • @SicdLing I think that's just a translation error, because he says something about other nations battleships as well, even though no country has operated a battleship since 2006. And does Korea really have the worlds largest shipbuilding industry? I really doubt that

  • @BeamMeUpScotty245 I doubt that as well. Maybe translation error too? Hahaha.

  • Got to admit, that a pretty big ship...

  • RANDING CRAFT AIR CUSHION BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

  • instead of arguing on the internet about ships all of you fools quit raging or join the damned navy

  • thats fucking crap, KING SEJONG CLASS, THE Most heavily armed ship with 2 or 3 cannons and INFINITY MISSILES! lol, i m lolling, this looks interesting though.........

  • Japanese Hyūga class 100,000 hp (75,000 kW) LM2500 Gas turbine

    Korean poor ship 32,000 hp diesel engine

    Puhahahaha

  • @oneofthejapanese what a bullshit, get the fuck out of youtube net to u yo ku

  • @yl86b4 You are asshole

    fuck kimchiman

    fuck off diry korean

    kimchis=scum,fece,bitch

  • This ship is trying to do too many things.

  • what ever u say, but the world biggest battleship is the Kirov (Russia) XD

  • @suntbelgae , heck no, any unit from the nimitz class, is big, over 100,000 tons and over 1,000 feet long

  • @salamander163 you fail to understand that the Kirov class is in the Guiness World REcords for the larget battleship -.-'

  • @salamander163 also, we said battleship, not aircraft carrier, theres a difference

  • @suntbelgae the biggest battleship ever was the yamato and the musashi battleships, 72,000 tons

  • @salamander163 Kirov is in the Guiness World Records as the worlds biggest battleship class, so yeah

    

  • @suntbelgae let's see: kirov length: 191.3 meters long, HMS Hood 260 meters long, kirov beam: 17.66 meters, Bismarck beam 36 meters, kirov displacement 7,890 tonnes, Yamato displacement, 72,000 tonnes, THESE beast are really big !!!!kirov is a punny ship, and the last remaining battleships, real battleships are the 4 units from the Iowa class: Missouri, Iowa, Wisconsin , New Jersey , ja ja

  • @salamander163 true, but theres one fatal flaw in your argument friend :) non of those ships are in service, and most of the ones u mentioned are building corall reefs at the bottom of the sea, while the others are rusting in harbour, decomishioned. but i understand, i should refraise my argument. Kirov is the world biggest ACTIVE battleship (and it also sports alot more punch then the ones u mentioned :P)

  • @suntbelgae Not according to Russian navy that classifies Kirov as "guided missile cruiser".

  • @ssmusic214 -.- look its the biggest cruier out therer fine, but its bigger then any battleship (because battleships in the traditional sense are obsolite) so the next big thing is cruisers. Ergo, The Worlds biggest ACTIVE battleship/cruiser is the Kirov class. done

  • @suntbelgae With 76 mm of max armor calling Kirov "battlecruiser" is laughable. Hand held RPG penetrates more than that.

  • @ssmusic214 not only is that a weak and pointless argument, but good luck geting close enough to even send that. modern warfare isnt about direct naval confrontations anymore, your not in the 40's anymore. now, before you even see that ship, u'd have a rocket, missile, or torpedo up your ass. like i said before, having huge high armor battleships is pointless in the modern world, its like giving a formula 1 car 50mm armor, y be strong wen can be fast and deadly?

  • @suntbelgae You're not making ANY SENSE!

    Try to get close to Nimitz class Carrier. Does it make it a Battleship?

  • @ssmusic214 omg r u really that stupid? Nimitz is an AIRCRAFT CARRIER!!! totally different from a BATLLESHIP AND CRUISER because it donst engage with WEAPONS of its own but PLANES!! im surprised you;d actually bring that argument up, it must makes you look desperate

  • @suntbelgae Idiot! Kirov is the "totally different from a BATLLESHIP AND CRUISER".

    It is MISSILE PLATFORM. No relation to classic Battleships or Cruisers.

  • @ssmusic214 u really wanna get that technical? cose technically a battleship like the USS New Jersey is A NAVAL ARTILLARY PLATFORM!! SO fuck your shitty argument. but lets hear it from you, prey tell, wat classsifies to u as a "Cruiser"? hmmm?

  • @suntbelgae Idiot! Getting technical - ship with 76 mm of armor and 2x3.9 inch guns Battlecruiser? Good joke!

    And NAVAL ARTILLARY PLATFORM is exact definition of Battleship or Battlecruiser.

    And BTW there is no word for "Battlecruiser" in Russian.

  • @ssmusic214 1st of all, y u bring that up? 2nd, THATS Y THEY CALL IS A BATLESHIP! its onyl in western media that uses battlecruiser. 3rdly, ur just running in circles. look retard, if u cant accept the fact that u r obviosly worng, then go complain to guiness world records, go complain to the russian navy, go complain to wikipedia, JUST GET INFOMED before u make urself look like an idiot, which at this point its funny who stupid u sound

  • @suntbelgae Brainless Idiot! Where is the SINGLE FACT in all that senseless gibber you're posting?

    Facts are: Kirov has 2x3.9 inch guns and 76mm max armor around reactor area.

    If that's your idea about "battlecruiser", you are totally deranged idiot.

    Many Destroyers have more than that.

    And Russians themselves classify her as "Missile Cruiser" - (Крейсер Ракетоносец).

    They built her. They know better what she is.

  • @ssmusic214 im going to say this nice and calmly, cose obviosly ur brain cant handle an argument. u mention ONE kind of gun on it, and think thats all it got, u think armor is everything, when armor these days is next to obsolite in teh Navy. tell me little boy, are you a part of a naval academy? no? then that explains it. cose im done talking to a little twit like u. it was funny at first to see ur stupidity, but now its just sad. go back to school u drop out, u obviosly need it

  • @suntbelgae Brainless Idiot! It is not ARMOR that's obsolete. It is WHOLE CONCEPT of battleships and battlecruisers that OBSOLETE!

    That's why US retired all of them and not building them anymore.

    That's why Russians classify Kirov as Guided Missile Cruiser not battlecruiser.

  • @ssmusic214 *facepalm* u realize u just went from arguing one point to another? battlecruiser by def is just any ship with medium armament who can take part in skirmishes or long ranged attacks, THAT is wat modern warfare is all about. Battleships are obsolete. yes, tahts wat i said long tiem ago. battlecruiser isnt, and jus so u know, jus cose a word is spelt dif dosnt mean it cant mean the same thing, like small or tiny. oh but u never though of that did u retard? obviosly not

  • @suntbelgae Idiot without a clue!

    In every NAVY in the world Battlecruiser is a warship with gunnery similar or comparable to a Battleship but less armor protection trading it for speed and maneuverability.

    Guided missile Cruiser has no relation to Battlecruiser whatsoever.

    Google it. Moron.

  • @ssmusic214 suntbelgae is somewhat correct, battlecruisers are lighter and smaller than battleships which are larger and much more heavily armed.

    However, battlecruisers do boast an armament simalar to battleships but are more manuverable making them excellent for policing and enforcing embargos. Suntbelgae is also wrong in calling battleships obsolete, battleships serve a varaiety of purposes including artillery, and shock and awe but their primary purpose is still naval combat.

  • @MadM0nte As the name itself implies BattleCruiser is cross between Battleship and Cruiser.Something in the middle. There are CARRENTLY NO BATTLESHIP OR BATTLECRUISER IN ACTIVE SERVICE in any navy in the world. All 4 Iowa Class BBs now museums (Some still listed as NAVY reserve force).

    And Admiral-class battlecruiser Hood was 47,430 tons. Larger than many battleships.