i dont know why people still bother defending AMDs bad choices (bulldozer= epic fail) until true multi-thread programs come out when you need 2000 cores that dont work together right and produce 6000000deg of heat then its amd all day but if you just want it to work and not need fire proof pants get a real processor from intel
The Intel is running 3.0 GHz. Let's clock it down to 2.1Ghz, like the AMD's are. And also, use some high threaded software what actually uses 16 cores or more.
@letter3able Got a 6 core myself, and Google Chrome is multi-threaded/GPU rendered. The same for Windows itself. I also use Bunkspeed Pro which uses all cores + GPU rendering.
lol thats funny, what are they testing video conversion or something i only have 4 cores and hd 5 series it takes under 10 minutes to do a full dvd conversion and under 1 minute for dvd to xvid conversions
Alot of these gatherings people will purposely slow down competitors systems and say theres is faster, AMD owns intel i dont care what video u make
@davidbaumann Sadly Intel and AMD use the EXACT same architecture ,so if it would be bad on Intel CPU, it would be even worse on AMD, cause the architecture (x86 AND x64(It is the X86 set with additional x64Registers and Intel IA64 set) and was produced by Intel! So they should know it better!)
fx-8150 performs very differently under different compilers. There are some tests where it actually BEATS the 12-thread 3960x when the Open64 compiler is used (C-ray rendering), but is only half as fast with other compilers. Sometimes Open64 is slower though.
Benchmarks do not represent the real potential of each CPU. In the real world, a single server DOES NOT run a range of software. It runs one program, and a compiler can be used that best fits the CPU+software. AMD is almost always better.
@TheGenesisfreak Ok which would you rather buy an expensive vehicle that has all the features you want and is reliable or a cheap vehicle with limited features and is very unreliable, the engine blows up, the tranny blows up... So which is it hmm??? Btw Amd can put as many cores into there cpu's as they want but they will always have low bus speeds and crappy L2 speeds, or L3 if they even got that far...
Kids these days are blinded by what defines a real gaming processor. A quad-core is the best you could use for a gaming at the moment. Because the most games can support is a quad core. The hex and octa cores are built for multitasking, heavy video rendering and other tasks that require heavy processing power. And i5-2500k would probably be the best choice atm. It can be heavily overclocked and is set at a very nice stock ghz speed anyways. i7's uses hyper threading, which video games cant use.
An employee of intel never will say, AMD is better. How many banchmark program was installed/uninstalled, before he found one, what cannot bench the benefits of 16 core?
I'd like to see an 8-core Intel processor calculate 123456789^123456789 quicker than a 16-core AMD processor in a multithreaded environment before they claim it to be 'faster'.
Your trying to compare something that is used for multitasking, with something that is used for gaming. That is like trying to compare chicken and turkey, they are completely different, even though they are both meat. Besides I don't see any specs for AMD on here, so for all I know your using 4 AMD Athlon's.
This is not true. The amd sever CPU's are build for multitasking that's why there not so fast in gaming programs or cin bench or anything related, same goes for Fx-8150 that's a sever CPU for gaming. So ya Intel is faster because they focus gaming rather then Multitasking. You have to learn CPU's first before you come with such jaded opinion like Intel wins, ya in gaming because they focus that. AMD will kill Intel in Multitasking, so buy for what you need rather then what you see.
@killerv135 Intel focuses on gaming? What? You don't understand CPUs if you make a stupid statement like that. They focus on IPC/IPS and power consumption. Being good at gaming comes from that, but not because making a gaming chip is what is important to them. The enthusiast market pales in comparison to server and heavy processing desktop markets.
When computing power is needed, you buy Intel because it is what delivers it (at this point in time). If its making you money you will gladly pay.
@mad0314 You don't know nothing about cpus so next read, think, understand what you are writing to someone. You need to go to school first then come back to me kid, you don't know a damn thing. So please don't replay to this comment in fact learn more on this subject period. I want educated people talking to me, not some Intel fanboy who wants Intel to be the best damn thing in the world, because sorry son IBM took that place a long time ago. Also i know you mom bought your Computer not you kid.
@killerv135 When backed up into a corner, throw out personal attacks, huh? You did not give a single rational argument.
Intel fanboy... ROFL. I would LOVE for AMD to make a chip to compete with Intel. I buy whatever is the best for my money at the time I buy. It doesn't matter if the box is blue or red. The fact is, right now, AMD has nothing to compete in the top end.
@mad0314 What did i tell you kid stop talking to me. The reason why what i say don't make any sense is that your stupid. Also i would not have thumbs up on a comment if it did not make sense, kid just stop talking to me. You speak of a rational argument talk for yourself because nothing you said from the start made any sense i mean a 1 year old kid can come up with a better put together argument then you, and plus this is not an argument son its the truth so for the last time stop talking to me
@killerv135 No, what you said makes no sense because you said NOTHING besides personal attacks. You did not say a single thing related to computers in either of your responses to my comments.
Also lol @ "your stupid," which is spelled wrong and so are half the words you type. Oh, irony...
@killerv135 "Sow how do you spell stupid???" "Plus i spell check my stuff before i send it Haahaha." Thats absolutely brilliant! You don't even know what you spelled wrong. Its blatantly obvious you don't even know how to construct a logical argument let alone put together a coherent sentence. You probably won't understand most of this, though, so you'll just post more personal attacks.
@killerv135 LOL! Yea right bud, intel wins with both hands down, had a Amd tripple core and a core 2 duo, the core 2 duo could do alot more in multitasking.
@killerv135 check your sources man. AMD will never even get close to lintel at multitasking this video is a test between the 2 top of the line server processors from both brands dealing with server specific tasks and the Intel Xeon is clearly faster and more efficient then you beloved Amd processor.
@YourComputerExpert Now just turn around and allow me to shove that shitty i7 processor up your fucking ass and make you cry while I play BF3 on max settings on a precious AMD FX-8150. :D Have a bad fucking life :D
@SilverWolf9000Pie Hey 13 year old idiot, shut your retarted face. What the fuck, "while I play BF3 on max settings". Hello? Running games: CPU/GPU. Increasing the graphics: GPU. Nevermind, go fuck yourself and your retarted ugly-ass mother, the 5th one, yeah, you have 5 because your father is a ho fucking moron and marries them. PS. Your 3rd mom has cancer.
the 8150 is a Gamer CPU and also called Intel killer!
Intel processors are also for multitasking! Look at the 2600k, which is a processor, that is 10% slower than the fx8150! And costs around the same or a bit less. Only difference, that it is has onyl halve of the cores!
Also 8150 is NO server CPU! It is bad. Sadly but true!
Never saw such a bad per mhz performance! Better AMD gives a Phenom II 8 cores to really kick Intels 2600k!
@XxXPenrdXxX Yeah.. It is certainly an 8 core processor with 4 pipelines(To say it in an very simplified form :D ).
But we all know, it has totally failed!
Also I was never a big fan of AMD because of their marketing. If someone can remember the Ati 4800 series vs NVIDA, where they told everyone it is around 60% faster and stuff, but if you looked at real reviews its the same as bulldozer: more gflops but less performance per flop!
@MrGermanBratwurst I wouldn't say its a full 8 core cause its like... Hybrid core (idk) I just wish amd just makes a newer socket that is able to us server chips and desktop chips. AMD's marketing is funny. (Btw I'm not a fanboy I have a blue team system and the red team system just missing a Green team system and The Tesla is out of my range) Remember AMD is the only competitor to Intel and you just gotta give them so credit for trying and keeping the pents out of the market.
@Taxemicshadow mhm... no there are sooooo many things. Like processing speed. Register size and then RAM, HDD, GPU etc. Pipeline, Data Bandwith :/
I certainly HATE the marketing!!! Always its made with the Ghz! (The same with Graphics card where all companys give their low end 20$ cards 2GB video ram...)
If it would be true, my GTX 570 with only 1,25GB of RAM would be slower than some of the shitty laptop graphics with 2GB :D
@killerv135 The bulldozer architecture was designed for improved low-threaded performance over the previous generation of AMD processors, so it is not entirely true that they are "server CPUs" only. The low thread performance is excellent, if threads are scheduled correctly and turbo-core is used. Because of this, the new Opteron 6200s are more appropriate for "Workstation" usage than the 6100s were.
THIS rendering IS just JPG images that's very diferent than rendering MATHEMATICAL CALCULATIONS AND BEST CHOICE FOR THAT " AMD 16 CORES " , for jpeg INTEL , for mathematical calculations AMD . who won NOBODY , because they need each other lol
for computer 3d rendering the most important is the ammount of cores no cares about graphics card .WE DON'T USE STUPID GRAPHIC CARDS , the mathematical calculations makes just the CPU and 16 CORES is the best choice on a good MOTHER BOARD . find a GOOD SERVER MOTHER BOARD FOR 16 CORES
@vectoranime123 I agree with you on that 100% Even though I really like Intel cpu's on the server/high end 3D rendering AMD does offer alot. Graphic cards play a minimal effect on rendering games/workload it might make it look pretty but time is money and more effective faster way it gets done the better.
so whats your point, cores just changes the architecture. for example, AMDs Quad Cores are faster than their own 6 cores but yet the 6 cores are still better and can process more even though its less Ghz
people start to understand most applications are designed to run intel architecture, recompiling the same program or installing the right drivers for amd,then you can see the REAL difference
@TheLycanjake1 the i7 relies on hyperthreading to be good, without it the i7 would fail lol once the bulldozer AM3 comes out then well see who has the better cpu
@DimebagCFH4Life Then when ivybridge comes out, bulldozer is screwed, then when amd's new processor comes out, ivybridge is screwed, it goes on and on.
Not only that, but u might believe that bulldozer is screwed, but the portion of people who actually buy the best of the best in intel and plan on empyting their wallets are such a small portiion of the pc market its barely existent (its just company bragging rights.)
@cojeapetru The basic idea is I own the GTX 580 and it crushes everything in benchmarks (which is what matters). I don't count the GTX 590 that was just stupid by nvidia. No i'm not a fan boy I use to own all ATI cards even back in the voodoo days but nvidia took over the crown.
@phantumgrey Bahahahahahahah! Where the hell did you hear that AMD restricts you to only using their GPU's, I'm using a GTX460 now.
Think you could call the fastest consumer level GPU (6990) a shitty GPU?
Read up before you make a fool of yourself.
And if AMD is gonna sell their 3.6gHz 8 core for $250, Intels gonna lower their prices (they've already been sued for playing dirty buy lowering their prices in such a way, Intel is not a fair business, AMD is an honest company that gives us value)
@oldVideoGamesChannel Not true. Back in the early to mid 90's AMD was recognized as being better and faster than intel. And as far as price to performance goes, AMD has ALWAYS been better.
Coming from someone in the computer industry.... from a business standpoint, all that matters is bang for buck. Ask ANYONE. Having a shiny box means nothing. AMD will always be cheap and efficient, and intel will always be slightly faster for 4x the price.
Keep in mind that this video was made with an intel bias. If it were AMD they wouldnt even need to cheat to make it look good. <3 AMD.
i dont know why people still bother defending AMDs bad choices (bulldozer= epic fail) until true multi-thread programs come out when you need 2000 cores that dont work together right and produce 6000000deg of heat then its amd all day but if you just want it to work and not need fire proof pants get a real processor from intel
letter3able 1 day ago
The Intel is running 3.0 GHz. Let's clock it down to 2.1Ghz, like the AMD's are. And also, use some high threaded software what actually uses 16 cores or more.
hansvansjon 5 days ago
@hansvansjon let me know what program you use daily that realy used more than 4
letter3able 1 day ago
@letter3able Got a 6 core myself, and Google Chrome is multi-threaded/GPU rendered. The same for Windows itself. I also use Bunkspeed Pro which uses all cores + GPU rendering.
hansvansjon 1 day ago
lol thats funny, what are they testing video conversion or something i only have 4 cores and hd 5 series it takes under 10 minutes to do a full dvd conversion and under 1 minute for dvd to xvid conversions
Alot of these gatherings people will purposely slow down competitors systems and say theres is faster, AMD owns intel i dont care what video u make
TheWickedsickness 1 week ago
@TheWickedsickness thats right AMD pisses over gay intel
kipstar1990 1 week ago
@TheWickedsickness
lol
ever heard of sandy bridge?
or westmere?
or nehalem?
or clarkdale?
guess not. Those chips have been MUCH faster clock per clock than anything AMD since nehalem released in 2008.
xSiliconKnightx 6 days ago
@YourComputerExpert i find you nonsene and naive nature to be amusing ;)
SilverWolf9000Pie 1 week ago
This is retarded what if you were using like a 2.2ghz amd proccesor and a 4.0 ghz intell proccesor
Inkwaboom 1 week ago
stupid....
sUp763 2 weeks ago
um that's from 2007 the 16 core just came out in October in 2010.
MrEquilibrium01 2 weeks ago
INTEL FANBOY ASSHOLE, i'll use intel but i don't humiliating AMD
ChyortSnipers 3 weeks ago
:D 0:23 .........16 cores in 2007?
FROXxCCCP 1 month ago
Comment removed
FROXxCCCP 1 month ago
Its because there are 2 threads per core...
TheMr418 1 month ago
AMD STILL THE NO1 INTEL SHIT..:)
35bigbri 1 month ago
If only his camera and microphone were as good as those computers.
IssiahDavid 1 month ago
Video was encoded on a Intel CPU :D
davidbaumann 1 month ago
@davidbaumann Sadly Intel and AMD use the EXACT same architecture ,so if it would be bad on Intel CPU, it would be even worse on AMD, cause the architecture (x86 AND x64(It is the X86 set with additional x64Registers and Intel IA64 set) and was produced by Intel! So they should know it better!)
MrGermanBratwurst 1 month ago
no its not faster than amd's new cpu...
MyDelldelldell 1 month ago
@MyDelldelldell No a 4 year old processor is not going to compete against a recent one...
Godslayerify 1 month ago
Hello 240p long time no see old friend
BuRgLaR187 1 month ago
fx-8150 performs very differently under different compilers. There are some tests where it actually BEATS the 12-thread 3960x when the Open64 compiler is used (C-ray rendering), but is only half as fast with other compilers. Sometimes Open64 is slower though.
Benchmarks do not represent the real potential of each CPU. In the real world, a single server DOES NOT run a range of software. It runs one program, and a compiler can be used that best fits the CPU+software. AMD is almost always better.
fmmjqtft1 1 month ago 2
i bet they swaped the display cables:)
TheNiggiboy 1 month ago
i bet the amd is cheaper though
movielegend25 1 month ago
8 Intel Cores = $16000000000000000000000000000000000000
16000000000000000000000000000000000000 Amd Cores = $8 LOL
TheGenesisfreak 1 month ago 78
@TheGenesisfreak Ok which would you rather buy an expensive vehicle that has all the features you want and is reliable or a cheap vehicle with limited features and is very unreliable, the engine blows up, the tranny blows up... So which is it hmm??? Btw Amd can put as many cores into there cpu's as they want but they will always have low bus speeds and crappy L2 speeds, or L3 if they even got that far...
MrTpengineer 1 month ago
@TheGenesisfreak LMAO. pretty accurate
demonsparkx 2 days ago
First of all fix you Gay cammicro u CUNT!
Giddeon87 1 month ago
Intel sucks ass in VMware Esx. It's shit and massively overpriced. but hay looks like most people on here build servers for gaming on here! WTF...
Blunder1248 1 month ago
The truth is its not actually 16 cores, its 8 partial cores sharing a Floating point scheduler.
superpyragas 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
your mother must be very proud of you
32CoolestDude 2 months ago
Kids these days are blinded by what defines a real gaming processor. A quad-core is the best you could use for a gaming at the moment. Because the most games can support is a quad core. The hex and octa cores are built for multitasking, heavy video rendering and other tasks that require heavy processing power. And i5-2500k would probably be the best choice atm. It can be heavily overclocked and is set at a very nice stock ghz speed anyways. i7's uses hyper threading, which video games cant use.
bamazudi 2 months ago
@bamazudi The Battle Field Games use up to 6 cores
XxXPenrdXxX 1 month ago
NVIDIAMDATINTEL
PuPuHamster 2 months ago
intel rocks just admit it looser amd fanboys
masterofnocrack 2 months ago
FUUUUUUUUCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK IIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNNNTTTTTTTTTTTEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL INTEL IS FUCKING DOG SHIT CUM FUCK JUNK FUCK YOU
xSpArTiChRiSx 2 months ago
Amd win
MenteFracturada 2 months ago
shut up!! those processor are made in my country Malaysia
MarlboroClassic 2 months ago 26
@MarlboroClassic also in Mexico, Costa Rica, Philippines, Thailand, and i don't remember where else!
UNDERLANDSOUNDS 1 month ago
@MarlboroClassic Wrong! Its made here in the Philippines you lousy Malay!
mcdus78 1 week ago
@mcdus78 that was 10 years ago you made it in Philippines in your bamboo labs.
MarlboroClassic 1 week ago
An employee of intel never will say, AMD is better. How many banchmark program was installed/uninstalled, before he found one, what cannot bench the benefits of 16 core?
isolance1 2 months ago
I'll take a slower processor for 1/4 the money thanks :). I'll just double on the amd and then wipe my ass with intell's crap :).
cblt2007 2 months ago
FUCK YOU FUCKING INTEL NOOBS
AMD PHENOM II X6 CAN FUCK 2 I7 2600K
SO STFU!
TheMkiller2012 2 months ago
SUck my dick fat boy! Intel sucks 4 ever!!!
xXxlegostarwarsxXx 2 months ago
AMD muuuuuuuuuuuuuuuch better...
MegaKagekage 2 months ago
Intel advertising = Pure shit and he want to spent your money on the fucking CPU'S
valy17400 2 months ago
I'd like to see an 8-core Intel processor calculate 123456789^123456789 quicker than a 16-core AMD processor in a multithreaded environment before they claim it to be 'faster'.
CJKay93 2 months ago
dont belive that is amd realy 10*faster than intel graphic and alu
armanav1234 2 months ago
fuck intel
armanav1234 2 months ago
200$ vs 900$ :D
Melhem97 2 months ago
bullshit
denudo19 2 months ago
foolish man says that as scooter(intel) is faster than ferrari f1(amd)
where he comes from
armanav1234 2 months ago
is there is a company intel to produse mp? i think it is a plastic cover company
each plastic worth arround 2rps
armanav1234 2 months ago
even canot on system led for 10 minutes tha much slower ..............
armanav1234 2 months ago
even cannot work system fan ................
armanav1234 2 months ago
Your trying to compare something that is used for multitasking, with something that is used for gaming. That is like trying to compare chicken and turkey, they are completely different, even though they are both meat. Besides I don't see any specs for AMD on here, so for all I know your using 4 AMD Athlon's.
MrSpecterryu 3 months ago
Well tested with an Benchmark not using multiple Cores o.O
DuringDariusHappened 3 months ago
What the heck? In 2007 16GB of RAM? My $2000 looks like shit, I only got 4GB of RAM (and 32 Bit OS...-_-)
ComputerBunnyMath123 3 months ago
@ComputerBunnyMath123
if you have a $2000 system with only 4GB of ram that means you're using macshit or you don't know how to buy/upgrade your system
Phr33d0m 3 months ago
@Phr33d0m I got it in 2008 smart-one!!! And it was a laptop....Sony Vaio FW Series
ComputerBunnyMath123 3 months ago
@ComputerBunnyMath123 intel is like a mudy plate with the dirty logo..................
armanav1234 2 months ago
@ComputerBunnyMath123 ya thats wild. Those computers are off the top
angeriod 2 months ago
@angeriod Haha. LOL.
ComputerBunnyMath123 2 months ago
@ComputerBunnyMath123 what?
angeriod 2 months ago
it's still not enough to run vista!
Th3beatD0wn 3 months ago
This is not true. The amd sever CPU's are build for multitasking that's why there not so fast in gaming programs or cin bench or anything related, same goes for Fx-8150 that's a sever CPU for gaming. So ya Intel is faster because they focus gaming rather then Multitasking. You have to learn CPU's first before you come with such jaded opinion like Intel wins, ya in gaming because they focus that. AMD will kill Intel in Multitasking, so buy for what you need rather then what you see.
killerv135 3 months ago 38
@killerv135 bullshit you fag amd can make 120 cores they are still slow as fuck and no game in the world supports 6 or 8 cores
ichhatte27zentimeter 3 months ago
@ichhatte27zentimeter Don't troll me again with stupid shit thanks.
killerv135 3 months ago
@ichhatte27zentimeter Because you don't know shit kid go to school and learn something, damn kid haha.
killerv135 3 months ago
@killerv135 Intel focuses on gaming? What? You don't understand CPUs if you make a stupid statement like that. They focus on IPC/IPS and power consumption. Being good at gaming comes from that, but not because making a gaming chip is what is important to them. The enthusiast market pales in comparison to server and heavy processing desktop markets.
When computing power is needed, you buy Intel because it is what delivers it (at this point in time). If its making you money you will gladly pay.
mad0314 2 months ago
@mad0314 You don't know nothing about cpus so next read, think, understand what you are writing to someone. You need to go to school first then come back to me kid, you don't know a damn thing. So please don't replay to this comment in fact learn more on this subject period. I want educated people talking to me, not some Intel fanboy who wants Intel to be the best damn thing in the world, because sorry son IBM took that place a long time ago. Also i know you mom bought your Computer not you kid.
killerv135 2 months ago
@killerv135 Your mom
killerv135 2 months ago
@killerv135 When backed up into a corner, throw out personal attacks, huh? You did not give a single rational argument.
Intel fanboy... ROFL. I would LOVE for AMD to make a chip to compete with Intel. I buy whatever is the best for my money at the time I buy. It doesn't matter if the box is blue or red. The fact is, right now, AMD has nothing to compete in the top end.
mad0314 2 months ago
@mad0314 What did i tell you kid stop talking to me. The reason why what i say don't make any sense is that your stupid. Also i would not have thumbs up on a comment if it did not make sense, kid just stop talking to me. You speak of a rational argument talk for yourself because nothing you said from the start made any sense i mean a 1 year old kid can come up with a better put together argument then you, and plus this is not an argument son its the truth so for the last time stop talking to me
killerv135 2 months ago
@killerv135 No, what you said makes no sense because you said NOTHING besides personal attacks. You did not say a single thing related to computers in either of your responses to my comments.
Also lol @ "your stupid," which is spelled wrong and so are half the words you type. Oh, irony...
mad0314 2 months ago
@mad0314 So how do you spell stupid???
killerv135 2 months ago
@mad0314 Stop spamming me please lol now this is getting funny. Plus i spell check my stuff before i send it Haahaha.
killerv135 2 months ago
@killerv135 "Sow how do you spell stupid???" "Plus i spell check my stuff before i send it Haahaha." Thats absolutely brilliant! You don't even know what you spelled wrong. Its blatantly obvious you don't even know how to construct a logical argument let alone put together a coherent sentence. You probably won't understand most of this, though, so you'll just post more personal attacks.
mad0314 2 months ago
@killerv135 intel=high performance,high price amd=good performance,good price
slyper8 2 months ago
@slyper8 I agree =).
killerv135 2 months ago
@killerv135 LOL! Yea right bud, intel wins with both hands down, had a Amd tripple core and a core 2 duo, the core 2 duo could do alot more in multitasking.
MrTpengineer 2 months ago
@MrTpengineer Chech Intel compiler controversory :).
kestutissnieska 1 month ago
@kestutissnieska lol ur funny...
MrTpengineer 1 month ago
@killerv135
shut up u stupid anb fanboy
masterofnocrack 2 months ago
@killerv135
amd fanbod
masterofnocrack 2 months ago
@killerv135 check your sources man. AMD will never even get close to lintel at multitasking this video is a test between the 2 top of the line server processors from both brands dealing with server specific tasks and the Intel Xeon is clearly faster and more efficient then you beloved Amd processor.
banannaninja 2 months ago
@banannaninja AMD's total profit is less than intels research budget. The fact they can create something close is astonishing.
superpyragas 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@killerv135 no shit sherlock
XD
32CoolestDude 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@killerv135 AMD Processors SUCK at MultiTasking you moron, they aren't for it. Intel Kills AMD in multitasking.
YourComputerExpert 2 months ago
@YourComputerExpert Now just turn around and allow me to shove that shitty i7 processor up your fucking ass and make you cry while I play BF3 on max settings on a precious AMD FX-8150. :D Have a bad fucking life :D
SilverWolf9000Pie 1 month ago
@SilverWolf9000Pie Hey 13 year old idiot, shut your retarted face. What the fuck, "while I play BF3 on max settings". Hello? Running games: CPU/GPU. Increasing the graphics: GPU. Nevermind, go fuck yourself and your retarted ugly-ass mother, the 5th one, yeah, you have 5 because your father is a ho fucking moron and marries them. PS. Your 3rd mom has cancer.
YourComputerExpert 1 month ago
@YourComputerExpert
Idiot it's the other way round AMD is great for multitasking, it's not good for single processes.
targetech 1 month ago
@killerv135 lol ur funny.
MrTpengineer 1 month ago
@killerv135 And you owned yourself^^
the 8150 is a Gamer CPU and also called Intel killer!
Intel processors are also for multitasking! Look at the 2600k, which is a processor, that is 10% slower than the fx8150! And costs around the same or a bit less. Only difference, that it is has onyl halve of the cores!
Also 8150 is NO server CPU! It is bad. Sadly but true!
Never saw such a bad per mhz performance! Better AMD gives a Phenom II 8 cores to really kick Intels 2600k!
MrGermanBratwurst 1 month ago
@MrGermanBratwurst the 8150 is actually a Quad core CPU which has a different form of SMT/HT the 8150 was the lower binned interlagoes
XxXPenrdXxX 1 month ago
@XxXPenrdXxX Yeah.. It is certainly an 8 core processor with 4 pipelines(To say it in an very simplified form :D ).
But we all know, it has totally failed!
Also I was never a big fan of AMD because of their marketing. If someone can remember the Ati 4800 series vs NVIDA, where they told everyone it is around 60% faster and stuff, but if you looked at real reviews its the same as bulldozer: more gflops but less performance per flop!
Actually the GTX 260 is a bit cooler and faster!
MrGermanBratwurst 1 month ago
@MrGermanBratwurst I wouldn't say its a full 8 core cause its like... Hybrid core (idk) I just wish amd just makes a newer socket that is able to us server chips and desktop chips. AMD's marketing is funny. (Btw I'm not a fanboy I have a blue team system and the red team system just missing a Green team system and The Tesla is out of my range) Remember AMD is the only competitor to Intel and you just gotta give them so credit for trying and keeping the pents out of the market.
XxXPenrdXxX 1 month ago
@MrGermanBratwurst How can you possibly have "less performance per flop"?
fmmjqtft1 3 weeks ago
@fmmjqtft1 Performance means the overall performance in games. GFLOPS means: How many floating points the cpu/gpu can calculate per second.
Most games doesn´t need only higher FLOP numebrs, they need other stuff too :)
I only want to show this very easy.
MrGermanBratwurst 3 weeks ago
@MrGermanBratwurst but do those extra flops even it out at least?
Taxemicshadow 1 week ago
@Taxemicshadow mhm... no there are sooooo many things. Like processing speed. Register size and then RAM, HDD, GPU etc. Pipeline, Data Bandwith :/
I certainly HATE the marketing!!! Always its made with the Ghz! (The same with Graphics card where all companys give their low end 20$ cards 2GB video ram...)
If it would be true, my GTX 570 with only 1,25GB of RAM would be slower than some of the shitty laptop graphics with 2GB :D
Today you really should check benches etc. :)
MrGermanBratwurst 1 week ago
@killerv135 u r dumb. its the other way around. intel is better at multitasking and shit, thats why theyre better for video editing and what not
gojirason 1 month ago
@killerv135 The bulldozer architecture was designed for improved low-threaded performance over the previous generation of AMD processors, so it is not entirely true that they are "server CPUs" only. The low thread performance is excellent, if threads are scheduled correctly and turbo-core is used. Because of this, the new Opteron 6200s are more appropriate for "Workstation" usage than the 6100s were.
fmmjqtft1 1 month ago
only beacus its more cores doesnt make it faster :P, and ofc intel is fasster !
WickedWizard95 3 months ago
THIS rendering IS just JPG images that's very diferent than rendering MATHEMATICAL CALCULATIONS AND BEST CHOICE FOR THAT " AMD 16 CORES " , for jpeg INTEL , for mathematical calculations AMD . who won NOBODY , because they need each other lol
vectoranime123 3 months ago
you cant compare a workstation class pc to a reg pc
shaun1982911 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
u should not check by benchmark intel slage head u should check all round performance
punithpurushotham 3 months ago
u should not check by benchmark intel slage head u should check all round performance
punithpurushotham 3 months ago
I wanna get one of those on my EVO 3D
Shadow2e12 3 months ago
I would rather go to AMD processors .. because its more cheaper and competitive than Intel Processors....
christianbangs 3 months ago
@christianbangs 2500k is cheaper and better than the fx 8150 trolololol
Amuffin456 3 months ago
Wait, let me get this straight.
Just about the only situation in which you would need sixteen cores is a server, which don't need to be clocked too high.
Is this the situation or what?
Toomuchtime5798 3 months ago
@KnownAsFarai
o Ok ;3 wel .. want a hug ?^^
XAnimeManiax 3 months ago
for computer 3d rendering the most important is the ammount of cores no cares about graphics card .WE DON'T USE STUPID GRAPHIC CARDS , the mathematical calculations makes just the CPU and 16 CORES is the best choice on a good MOTHER BOARD . find a GOOD SERVER MOTHER BOARD FOR 16 CORES
vectoranime123 3 months ago
@vectoranime123 I agree with you on that 100% Even though I really like Intel cpu's on the server/high end 3D rendering AMD does offer alot. Graphic cards play a minimal effect on rendering games/workload it might make it look pretty but time is money and more effective faster way it gets done the better.
Vargas1349 3 months ago
amd for broke bitches get over it and get a job and go for intel
BlueDrankFX 3 months ago
@KnownAsFarai
you mad bro ?
XAnimeManiax 3 months ago
@KnownAsFarai Yes intel just recently released the 8-core Xeon not in 2007 DERRRH think before YOU SPEAK
2040Tech 3 months ago
i love both, intel and amd but i prefer amd for the price and for gaming processors
tugaxD23 3 months ago
I love Intel so I know this Intel doesn't have any 8 core processors only 6 Core i7
2040Tech 3 months ago
what kind of bullshit testing is this
theWorldgottalent 3 months ago
952 people have AMD Processors...
2000jago 3 months ago
Gun shots in the background!
b120nx 3 months ago
wel.... in 2007 they have 16 Cores but im stuck with Quad and Six Cores ?
XAnimeManiax 3 months ago
oh yeah I mean if its run by intel then there's no way it could be biased...
James3076081 3 months ago
so whats your point, cores just changes the architecture. for example, AMDs Quad Cores are faster than their own 6 cores but yet the 6 cores are still better and can process more even though its less Ghz
4232267 4 months ago
So its better in one app? And how much more does it cost? And how does it scale in VM which is why you'd buy a 16 core CPU in the first place? hmmm?
statikreg 4 months ago 4
On synthetic benchmarks that are catered to intel... maybe..
evolutionpr 4 months ago
No kidding that a Intel is faster than a AMD
who is this guy who makes this video?
a Fucknugget er something?
really every dumb fuck knows that a intel is faster.
nargarothfreak666 4 months ago
AMD is the best !
GameTrailerUltimate 4 months ago
intel the best . shut the fuck up faggot !
Ka0sSSJ 4 months ago
Intel 8 Core: 90% More Expensive, 30% Faster. When you see it, you'll shit bricks.
mooman219 4 months ago
THe real number of cores in Intel processors is:
real core count= number of cores in device manager / 2
because in hyperthreading, there are 2 threads per core. making your OS detect 2 cores instead of one
taejamhaha 4 months ago
so why pay on emulated cores if you can just pay cheaper but with real core?
TO HELL WITH HYPERTHREADING!!!!!
---
that's the reason why I can't install my overture 2.11 (cracked) in my classmates laptop but I could install in the pc with pentium 4 or any amd chip
taejamhaha 4 months ago
I would rather have 16 cores, just because it sounds pimp.
AllofVideos 4 months ago 72
@AllofVideos thats like saying i'd rather have the 3000 watt asfjklsdfjksdf sound system than the 1500watt sony one
gothen1234 3 months ago
@gothen1234 lol sony
ian48065 3 months ago
@AllofVideos Or you could have 16 threads?
colinprprpr 3 months ago
@AllofVideos i know it like 20% faster but 3x more expensive..
HyperSTAND 3 months ago
intel is like a mudy plate with the dirty logo..................@AllofVideos
armanav1234 2 months ago
people start to understand most applications are designed to run intel architecture, recompiling the same program or installing the right drivers for amd,then you can see the REAL difference
Landkeeper86 4 months ago
if hes working for intel what else do you expect
go and eat some froggs id say
Lavdimi01 4 months ago
The best Price for performance right now is the intel i5 2500k. Beats the shit outa my 1090t.
AsianPerson3 4 months ago
Was the microphone running on 8 Intel cores?
lifehackertips 4 months ago 98
@lifehackertips Hahahaha.
xsmicro 3 months ago
Comment removed
UNIXSOLJA 4 months ago
@UNIXSOLJA thei are using 16 core amd you think thas a desktop cpu in 2007 retard
didierdalx 4 months ago
@didierdalx before calling a MCSE tard. Ask why??
You think there is such thing as 16 core amd processor. OMG
What I am saying is they are comparing xeon to athlon....
Not fair, but you don't even comprehend this stuff so go away noob.
You didn't even make sense.
UNIXSOLJA 4 months ago
8 cores??? HAHAHAH its a quad core that wishes it was a true 8 core like AMDs bulldozer
DimebagCFH4Life 4 months ago
@DimebagCFH4Life then that makes intel even better then since 4 cores beat it, idiot
TheLycanjake1 4 months ago
@TheLycanjake1 the i7 relies on hyperthreading to be good, without it the i7 would fail lol once the bulldozer AM3 comes out then well see who has the better cpu
Intel i7 vs AMD FX-8130P
DimebagCFH4Life 4 months ago
@DimebagCFH4Life Then when ivybridge comes out, bulldozer is screwed, then when amd's new processor comes out, ivybridge is screwed, it goes on and on.
Amuffin456 4 months ago
@Amuffin456 SO many people are so stupid! Yes intel makes the FASTEST, but for games,
$200 AMD cpu + $800 gpu will always beat a $600 intel cpu + $400 gpu in games.
ivy bridge + mobo + tripplechannel ram = $1000+ alone. waste.
Not only that, but u might believe that bulldozer is screwed, but the portion of people who actually buy the best of the best in intel and plan on empyting their wallets are such a small portiion of the pc market its barely existent (its just company bragging rights.)
Exgaves 4 months ago
@Exgaves It just goes on and on mate. Everytime amd or intel comes out with a new processor the previous generation will be screwed.
Amuffin456 4 months ago
@Exgaves Your forgetting. You buy an AMD your stuck using shitty ATI video cards
phantumgrey 4 months ago
@phantumgrey ati is way better than nvidia
based on the products that i had at least
8600, 8600 sli 8800, 9600, 9800gtx+, gts250, gtx270, gts450, gtx460, 550ti and 560ti
hd 4670, hd 4850, hd 5670, hd 5770, hd 5870, hd 6750, hd 6850
this should give you a basic ideea
cojeapetru 4 months ago
@cojeapetru The basic idea is I own the GTX 580 and it crushes everything in benchmarks (which is what matters). I don't count the GTX 590 that was just stupid by nvidia. No i'm not a fan boy I use to own all ATI cards even back in the voodoo days but nvidia took over the crown.
phantumgrey 4 months ago
@cojeapetru FYI the GTX 460 even out preforms the HD6850
phantumgrey 4 months ago 2
@phantumgrey then let me say again
ati ourperforms nvidia in most cases
but i do agree some video cards made by nvidia are better
cojeapetru 4 months ago
@phantumgrey Bahahahahahahah! Where the hell did you hear that AMD restricts you to only using their GPU's, I'm using a GTX460 now.
Think you could call the fastest consumer level GPU (6990) a shitty GPU?
Read up before you make a fool of yourself.
And if AMD is gonna sell their 3.6gHz 8 core for $250, Intels gonna lower their prices (they've already been sued for playing dirty buy lowering their prices in such a way, Intel is not a fair business, AMD is an honest company that gives us value)
Exgaves 4 months ago
@Exgaves You mad?
phantumgrey 4 months ago
@phantumgrey Dissappointed that you're so naive would be a better way to explain it champ.
Enjoy the wastings of money.
Exgaves 4 months ago
@phantumgrey stuck with ati vid card if using amd chip? wow you are retarded beyond belief lol
Zanins 4 months ago
@Zanins I'm talking out my ass to get all you silly AMD fans boys fired up! It was highly amusing. Thank you!
phantumgrey 4 months ago
@Exgaves hate to break it to ya bro but the gtx 590 is the worlds fastest video card look it up.
alone8406 4 months ago
@phantumgrey Shitty ATI video cards? When ATI came out with the 4000 series, Nvidia laid off over 170 employees.
SlaughteredInside 4 months ago
@SlaughteredInside Who cares about lay offs. I go by benchmarks :)
phantumgrey 3 months ago
Comment removed
DimebagCFH4Life 4 months ago
fuckn noobs if you dont have a program that can utalize 16 cores 8 cores is going to preform better its a proven fact...>.>
SOxxLegit 4 months ago
Why is everyone so mad? AMD Cpus have always been shit.
oldVideoGamesChannel 4 months ago
@oldVideoGamesChannel And you are gay
sync2412 4 months ago
@oldVideoGamesChannel Not true. Back in the early to mid 90's AMD was recognized as being better and faster than intel. And as far as price to performance goes, AMD has ALWAYS been better.
SlaughteredInside 4 months ago
@SlaughteredInside That really doesn't matter anymore and hasn't since the 90s PCs are so cheap i'll just buy the one with the faster intel core i7.
oldVideoGamesChannel 4 months ago
@SlaughteredInside The US Government owns stocks in Intel also, I'll give them no more of my money if I can keep from it!
xeridian 4 months ago
The price of the Intel CPU they are using: $9000
The price of the AMD CPU: Less than $500
Coming from someone in the computer industry.... from a business standpoint, all that matters is bang for buck. Ask ANYONE. Having a shiny box means nothing. AMD will always be cheap and efficient, and intel will always be slightly faster for 4x the price.
Keep in mind that this video was made with an intel bias. If it were AMD they wouldnt even need to cheat to make it look good. <3 AMD.
Tyler11440 4 months ago
@Tyler11440 Well said. Thank you.
SlaughteredInside 4 months ago