Got a moderately effective 40mm long barrel railgun. Pitty I didn't write up a good report.
But either way I'm hoping to come back to this project someday with my 300mm gun and a new power supply. Though I'm still wondering about Faraday's Law as the gun essentially is a single wind coil and and AC current won't help much... I think I may have given a lot away in that sentence.
If you don't mind paying 500 million dollars for kilometre of track in respect to 1 million dollars per kilometre (copper instead of steel tracks for conductivity), EMP's jamming computers on and around the train, and nearby power grid, high costs maintaining the axils, wheels and tracks due to arcing and the threat of sever electrocution (sever-as the organism will explode due to high currents) to anything crossing the tracks. It's doable. Though you may have a few complaints. :P
@Zappyguy111 what if money were not involved and you plenty of electricity -i appreciate the feedback -also is it pssible in combination with maglev -or does there have tobe contact with the rail -also what about the vacumated tube train in zeitgeist addendum - could speeds of 4000mph be attainable? - any way i appreciate the info -i have had some other response to that question some saying no some saying yes -
The maglev is already efficient enough as it is, and even if you do have the extra money at hand, I wouldn't bother as it would require more maintenance than the traditional method. Yes the vacuum tube train could theoretically reach such speeds, though it'd be astronomically expensive to build, but cheap to run. Wind resistance causes a car doing 90kph is more efficient than a car doing 100kph. It's also the reason why I can't do 70kph on my bike... only 50.
Railguns are good at one thing, and that's making little things go really fast. But they're a "here's three options pick one" situation, speed, efficiency and cost.
We ,Australia, held the world record for projectile speed with one of these since the 1970's up until the Americans caught up. But the Americans had to beat it with a 2kg shell rather than a 20g pellet...
Why does the u.s.a want them? High energy to dollar ratio per round.
I have considered doing that, but I was running short on time and had to use permanent magnets. But this is something I'm certain to do with my 300mm gun as I doubt I could get Nd magnets that long and only 5mm wide. Plus you can get much stronger magnets with coils than Nd magnets. Theoretically it'd work according to Lorentz law. But you'd have to keep the coil's resistance down (keeping it cold will help) or doing lots of single winds in parallel.
If you could, would you ever consider filming one of these guns at around 5000fps? In other words, would you show us a slow-mo version? I would certainly love to see one.
Could you (or anyone) increase the power and efficiency if you put strong permanant magnets just behind the armature's starting position positioned to repel the armature when the current flows?
Yes you can. There is a big catch with that though, which explains why you only see it on tiny guns: the highest field strength achievable from a permanent magnet is about a Tesla; the field around the rails of a gun like this is many tens of Tesla; because of that what would actually happen is that you would waste energy reverse magnetising the magnets. Smaller guns can pick up a lot of efficiency from external augmentation like that though.
Based my year 12 assignment around your work.
Got a moderately effective 40mm long barrel railgun. Pitty I didn't write up a good report.
But either way I'm hoping to come back to this project someday with my 300mm gun and a new power supply. Though I'm still wondering about Faraday's Law as the gun essentially is a single wind coil and and AC current won't help much... I think I may have given a lot away in that sentence.
Zappyguy111 8 months ago
can this increase the speed of bullet trains
MrIzzyDizzy 11 months ago
@MrIzzyDizzy
If you don't mind paying 500 million dollars for kilometre of track in respect to 1 million dollars per kilometre (copper instead of steel tracks for conductivity), EMP's jamming computers on and around the train, and nearby power grid, high costs maintaining the axils, wheels and tracks due to arcing and the threat of sever electrocution (sever-as the organism will explode due to high currents) to anything crossing the tracks. It's doable. Though you may have a few complaints. :P
Zappyguy111 8 months ago
@Zappyguy111 what if money were not involved and you plenty of electricity -i appreciate the feedback -also is it pssible in combination with maglev -or does there have tobe contact with the rail -also what about the vacumated tube train in zeitgeist addendum - could speeds of 4000mph be attainable? - any way i appreciate the info -i have had some other response to that question some saying no some saying yes -
MrIzzyDizzy 8 months ago
@MrIzzyDizzy
The maglev is already efficient enough as it is, and even if you do have the extra money at hand, I wouldn't bother as it would require more maintenance than the traditional method. Yes the vacuum tube train could theoretically reach such speeds, though it'd be astronomically expensive to build, but cheap to run. Wind resistance causes a car doing 90kph is more efficient than a car doing 100kph. It's also the reason why I can't do 70kph on my bike... only 50.
Zappyguy111 8 months ago
@MrIzzyDizzy
Railguns are good at one thing, and that's making little things go really fast. But they're a "here's three options pick one" situation, speed, efficiency and cost.
We ,Australia, held the world record for projectile speed with one of these since the 1970's up until the Americans caught up. But the Americans had to beat it with a 2kg shell rather than a 20g pellet...
Why does the u.s.a want them? High energy to dollar ratio per round.
Zappyguy111 8 months ago
im trying to re-do my failed railgun and just getting some ideas from you but what is that long coil of wire thats parallel to the barrel??
shadowOrgon 1 year ago
@shadowOrgon
I have considered doing that, but I was running short on time and had to use permanent magnets. But this is something I'm certain to do with my 300mm gun as I doubt I could get Nd magnets that long and only 5mm wide. Plus you can get much stronger magnets with coils than Nd magnets. Theoretically it'd work according to Lorentz law. But you'd have to keep the coil's resistance down (keeping it cold will help) or doing lots of single winds in parallel.
Zappyguy111 8 months ago
If you could, would you ever consider filming one of these guns at around 5000fps? In other words, would you show us a slow-mo version? I would certainly love to see one.
ItchyFlea1 1 year ago
This thing is gonna replace flamethrowers as backpack weapons.
T3XProductions 1 year ago
@T3XProductions The amount of power you'd need for an army of people carrying railguns would require a portable nuclear reactor I think. :P
mrnorris88 1 year ago
that thing just sounds so badass
TGram29 1 year ago
@TGram29
Hate to break it to you, it's just the air... the gun barely makes any sound on it's own.
Zappyguy111 8 months ago
@Zappyguy111 then air is badass
TGram29 8 months ago
very goood can any 1 give me some plans ......i like tech so help me if can ....
OldSnakeKonovesis 1 year ago
Could you (or anyone) increase the power and efficiency if you put strong permanant magnets just behind the armature's starting position positioned to repel the armature when the current flows?
JaycubL 1 year ago 2
Yes you can. There is a big catch with that though, which explains why you only see it on tiny guns: the highest field strength achievable from a permanent magnet is about a Tesla; the field around the rails of a gun like this is many tens of Tesla; because of that what would actually happen is that you would waste energy reverse magnetising the magnets. Smaller guns can pick up a lot of efficiency from external augmentation like that though.
Powerlabs 1 year ago
@JaycubL
Done it, my railgun wouldn't have worked with out them. Feel free to watch the videos.
Zappyguy111 8 months ago
@Zappyguy111 Cool! I will watch the videos.
JaycubL 8 months ago
HOLY CRAP
jorsekoira 2 years ago
wow (:
antiswattt2 2 years ago
Great video Sam!!! Although there was a particular feel to watching it on the Science channel... ; )
Pyrotrons 2 years ago
damn it sam! lol i wish i could build one of those ha haha thats pretty cool, would love to be in your shoes haha
Snakebite420 2 years ago