How To Start A War -- (The Covert Strike-First Policy)

[Rikiru]

HockeyDude, it's all about means and motive. Plus, his "Great Society" conflicted with JFK's ideals and policies. LBJ was just another white man who thought it was his "God given duty" to police other cultures..just another way to say White Supremacist...have you ever watched Avatar or Pocahontas?

[nsharif]

How to Start a War: The American Use of War Pretext Incidents by Richard Sanders on Global Research.ca explains many of the other wars...

[centurion180ad]

The overthrow and assassination of Xiem, was performed by CIA. While he was performing the desired slaughter among his own people, he was too unwilling to take orders from the Embassy the real RSVN head of state.

The socalled chaos following Xiem assassination coincided with Kennedy assassination, and an entire new direction was masterminded by the mass murdering Debt Syndicate.

The SECDEF in this video, is a psychopath and a liar.

[barrywilliamsmb]

THERE! I saw it!

The Leash! Did anyone else see it!!

Oh...

For a second there, I thought we were on a leash.

Who loves ya, Shillwhore?

[mattius83]

USA! USA! I believe everything my government tells me. NOT!!! Where should we start: here, or the attacks on 9/11? Seriously, who the hell believes the propaganda the 9/11 Commission wants us to buy into? The fact is this: our government past and present deliberately lies to its citizens, in order to make money, invade nations, and build empires across the globe. Even though the cost of such action is human life. Good video.

[Rikiru]

LBJ killed Kennedy, end of story.

[Shillwhore]

The motive was defiantly to force LBJ into the Presidency to back the Vietnam war and get it into full-swing.

When it comes to the assassination of JFK, there is only one motive. Also really only one group that could pull this sort of thing off and most importantly of all... not get caught.

LBJ is one of the most misguided and ruthless criminals in history. What he O.K'd for that war makes him a heartless, godforsaken monster.

Rot in hell LBJ

[HockeyDude831]

I wouldn't call LBJ a monster. I highly doubt he wanted to go to Vietnam just for the sake of killing Vietnamese. He was attempting to stop the spreading of communism throughout all of Asia. May find it hard to believe but he was doing what he thought was the proper move. Also,Lyndon Johnson's main priority when he became president was his Great Society platform, not Vietnam.

[HockeyDude831]

@Rikiru You can't seriously stand by that statement? What evidence is there that links LBJ to the assassination of JFK.

[fcrim]

Fascinating video thanks. I dread to think what secret conversations "justifying" the Iraq war exist that will never be declassified.

[Shillwhore]

There's a fly on the wall somewhere with a price on it's head. Ha Ha.

Thanks for commenting btw.

[flashoftruth]

hard to believe no one has commented on this video...what is even harder to believe is that there are still people out there that don't think governments ever intentionally deceive people to further their own objectives, even if it is at the expense of the very people they are supposed to 'serve' (and it ALWAYS is). THIS country is one of the, if not THE biggest perpetrator of these scenarios. the iraq/afghanistan wars are no exception, yet many still believe in this neocon government. wake up.

[Shillwhore]

Thanks for the comment.

What I find hard2 believe is how easily the media can demonize a leader, race, or religion and still keep up their pretence of political correctness.

Stirring up race-hate and intercontinental fear-mongering seems to be what they get paid for.

Now the US has started an act of aggression through Georgia and is busily demonizing the Russians and the Russian leaders through the western media.

America's no different2 other nations of past history but we have new-war tactics

[MattHughes2011]

@flashoftruth Uh huh... And how did the US involvement in the conflicts of Vietnam "further their own objectives"?

[flashoftruth]

@MattHughes2011

whose "objectives" are you talking about?

regardless though, war is ALWAYS profitable to men in suits therefore furthering their objectives...this isn't a surprise is it?

[MattHughes2011]

@flashoftruth You are implying that the US somehow benefitted from the Vietnam conflict.

Regardless though, are you directing "men in suits" to private business owners, or the government in general?

[flashoftruth]

@MattHughes2011

name one war the US has been involved in that they have NOT benefitted from? but it is not really the US is it? because the US PEOPLE as a whole actually lose; respect, debt, higher prices, dead soldiers, etc. "men in suits" are ANYONE who profits as a result of asinine, many times avoidable &/or 'created', conflicts in which the rich get richer and the not-so-rich end up being the ones who suffer & die. meanwhile all who deal with the inevitable PTSD are affected as well.

[MattHughes2011]

@flashoftruth Umm.. Vietnam? Korea? Those Cold War conflicts? How were "men in suits" individually benefitting from those? They weren't. They were actions by the United Nations to become involved, but no.. Simply because every other country is too pussy shit to actually do anything, the US was directed all the attention. Nobody talks about the UN vs Vietnam.. It's America vs Vietnam.

It was the effort by Western society to halt the spread of an unstable political system.

[flashoftruth]

@MattHughes2011

who makes the weapons and ammunition? who makes the uniforms? the rations, the housing? not to mention the fact that the vietnem war was orchestrated by the US govt. with the gulf of tonkin. did you not watch this vid? ANY time we are at war, men in suits are getting richer. companies always profit by supplying the means to wage war. this has little to do with the needs of the people and more to do with power struggles and penis envy which benefit none but men in suits.

[MattHughes2011]

@flashoftruth That's an odd view on war crime, but I understand the point you're making.

"did you not watch this vid?" Maybe that's why my view is different. Perhaps you could use some direct approaches to evidence rather than semi-appealing YouTube videos?

Not saying you're wrong at all, but I've managed to realize throughout many experiences that information is the new form of power. Tragically, it is the most flexible form of power, and is easily toyed with.

Just keep your eys & ears open.

[flashoftruth]

@MattHughes2011

sorry, but an audio tape is pretty darn convincing evidence and far from being biased when presented as is. not to mention that i rarely take a YT vid at face value without researching it first...this is merely confirmation. for as evidenced by history, the black flag operations of our government that few americans even want to know about, have proven to me that accepting our government's account of ANYTHING would not be wise. i wouldn't trust them to give me baseball scores.

[MattHughes2011]

@flashoftruth When you say "our government", what part of that government are you implying? The general Press, Head of State, State Department, DoD, Intelligence, etc etc? 'Cus I've worked in the US government for 12 years now, often time with or just below some very powerful people. Never have I found such disgrace in those individuals like you are proposing. Maybe I'm just around all the good guys in the government, but, through what I've seen, it's not as corrupt as you may think.

[flashoftruth]

@MattHughes2011

i am certain the politicians that we see are not the ones actually in control. they are mere puppets for those who truly pull the strings. you were not specific in what capacity of the government you "worked", but i find it difficult to believe you are unaware of the true nature of politics & power nor the black flag operations this government has orchestrated over the years. some would call these "conspriracy theories", but there are far too many documented to all be BS.

[flashoftruth]

*conspiracy

sorry, my laptop is fried

[MattHughes2011]

@flashoftruth Yeah I understood your "black flag" remark.

And sorry, I was in the Marine Corps for 6, and am still in the CIA for 6 on-going as a foreign military operation analyst. Perhaps my views have accumulated due to my international involvement rather than domestic attention, my job as an analyst has put me in various embassies for pretty much the entire time.

And again, I legitimately side with you on the fact that the US government isn't a room of monks, but it's not a thriller movie.

[flashoftruth]

@MattHughes2011

nope...most "thriller movies" are over in 90 mins...our govt. reminds me more of a never ending HORROR movie though...or a comedy, depending on how you look at it...

you and i haven't actually met and yet already we have discussed both 'taboo' subjects, politics AND religion WITHOUT cursing or name calling...i had to send a friend request.

[MattHughes2011]

@flashoftruth Haven't received a friend request, sent you one, jackass (ended that spree).

Also, I enjoy looking at our government as a comedy in certain aspects, and God knows I've laughed my ass off at some of the things that go on.

But honestly, since I was 19 I've desperately wanted to somehow achieve a position in this nation's security council, or perhaps somewhere around that status. Who knows.. Maybe I will, and I'll get back to you on what really goes on up there.

[flashoftruth]

@MattHughes2011

thx 4 the laf

[flashoftruth]

@MattHughes2011

and sorry again, i always say "black flag" but it's "false flag" & "black ops"...

google "History of American false flag operations" for but the tip of the iceberg...