haters gonna hate. fucking chinese kids cant admit that goguryeo is a korean history. the fact that you even made a youtube channel called "fucksouthkoreagook" proves your desperate :(
@Guns4Combat Anybody who has studied the history of the region knows that Koguryo was founded by Altaic peoples, not Koreans. It's a PART of Korean history and a part of Chinese history but it's NOT Korean or Chinese.
Umm yeah idk about turks becoming Koguryo or anything but...awhile Koguryo was present. Turk was also present as a country. So I don't think Turk, and Koguryo Mix.
People should know Wa of Japan never was advanced nation at that time. Most of Kofun to Nara era artifacts excavated were all from ancient Korea. Japan was still known to be barbaric until 17th century.
kk they were relatively different from todays koeran culture since they still retained the nomadic culture of their ancestor (huns monglos turks) and language would have been comepletely in audible today.l they used the same armor as the Persian aryan ppl both settle and nomadic(look a Saka armor in particular)
also u will notice they have a lot in common iwht iranian aryan culture the brough twith them from their former nomadic was (mean all korean kinddoms applie to thsi statement) becuase if u look at huns and the gold work its iranin influenced the asina nomads offereed bows(bow was primary weapon among acestors of modern east asin ppl other ppl reallied on spear)
so the ancient koreans alwasys had a good gold metalurgy culture producing beautiful piece. in the war with Sui and again with Tang/silla they used japanese mercinaries.
@kaindrg interesting! May I know where u got this information? It is interesting that japanese mercenaries were used in the war :D. Was it only Goguryeo? I assumed Baekje had closer ties to Japan heh and Baekje did use Japanese mercenaries. Did Goguryeo did so too? Since Goguryeo was the furthest in proximity from Japan of all the three kingdoms, I am rather surprised xD. Could you provide a source?
@Pikaqiu well for my other comments all i had to do was go to NYC and go to the exibition gallery on afghan aryan hill tombs. and look at armor gold work etc. the other u can get from asian history books actually from the time period of three kingdoms like samguk sagi, nihonshoki, and book of tang and sui.
@Pikaqiu but as a read them it seems more likely that japan was incontrol of shilla nad paekche rather than being paid off as a mercenary country i seem more likely japan was amilitary threat to them idk u should check it out ur self too dont take my word for it. alot of ppl will tell u that might be historical muddling or fiction but idk y would korean sources would want to make u p lost of story of their short commings
@kaindrg Yeah. I need to visit one of those places. A pity that even when i visited korea all they showed me were joseon dynasty ruins. Like Hwaseong and the Gyeongbokgong. Relics of the three kingdoms are rare to come by and I never saw any of them. Save for a Joseon modified silla temple in mt seorak. Anyway alot of korean sources are not really 100% accurate because the japanese burnt 300000 of their books during ww2. Not sure where i got this from cant rmb.
@Pikaqiu n ah the samguk sagi wouldnt be burned becacause these reports were written showign japanses pirate as powerful plus even the stele of gwanggaeto in manchuria(around the area of former gogoreyo dominion) reports these same claims andteh japanese left it untouched otehr then a ink rubbing to shwo the meije emperor
Samguk Sagi never mentions Japanese being "powerful", the script on gwanggaeto could be false since its POV of Goguryeo and that many of the scripts have been touched or damaged purposely.
@Hanul91 explain how.. gogureayo hanji word order and usage were different from tang and japan let alone modern ppl so even if hanji experts from china, korea, and japan came to analyze it they would have trouble reading it since many of the words are used in different context even so that might even make em wrong about the strong japan may be they were just talking about their god king concept who knows,
If japan was so strong, why haven't they were introduced Iron later in Three kingdoms? The logic doesn't make sense at all plus there are no such proofs of japan being powerful?
@Hanul91 explain how.. gogureayo hanji word order and usage were different from tang and japan let alone modern ppl so even if hanji experts from china, korea, and japan came to analyze it they would have trouble reading it since many of the words are used in different context even so that might even make em wrong about the strong japan may be they were just talking about their god king concept who knows.
@Hanul91 also how come three kingdoms korea never earned the resepct of the chinese hmmm? the japanese were well enuf taht the sui emperor gave him a gold seal while korean nations couldnt even get a copper seal
That time, the Three Kingdoms didn't have any sort of relationship with Chinese other than commerce. Japan was just a vassal state to Sui and Tang and that's why Chinese emperor named them Wa but Japs refused and took the name "Nippon".
@kaindrg btw baekje was also a close ally of japan. No other korean kingdom has such close relations with japan as baekje.. Its said that the last members of the royal family even fled to japan when Silla conquered baekje..
@Pikaqiu O i just remeberthe name of the crown i saw at NYC metropilitan museum Tilla tepes crown . it maaybe older than korean models but its similar. it may also give u some insight into how close koreans were with the mongols and huns who were the ones who introduced koreans to metal working via the aryan iranian tribe. silla crown is more ornamental then baekje and gayas and is base on korean's sibearian ancestrial religion symbolizing teh deer or the father tree
@Pikaqiu alsou can notice the paekje armor resembles the bronze and iron armors of the the prehistoric japanese. some korean biases scholars will tell u that its korean influence but japanese models are dated to be alot older. and also before the constant raids by japanese the kindonms of paekje and silla used kogureyo armor(aka iranian aryan armor taught to huns and mongols then to koreans)
@Hanul91 which term would have been more preferable iranians or Aryana either its means iranians beccause all the different tribes collectively called them selves aryan aka iranian. also i forgot to list bactrain before also three kingdoms era spaned from BCE tho the defeat of goguryeo in 668 CE
all the dramas romantacise them they were ok for the time not as fantastic as one would thing tehy controled alot fo filler land taht was later taken by nomads
Goguyeo is korean
Goguryeo = Goryeo = "Korea"
SirHungryHippo 1 month ago
@fucksouthkoreagook
haters gonna hate. fucking chinese kids cant admit that goguryeo is a korean history. the fact that you even made a youtube channel called "fucksouthkoreagook" proves your desperate :(
Guns4Combat 3 months ago
@Guns4Combat Anybody who has studied the history of the region knows that Koguryo was founded by Altaic peoples, not Koreans. It's a PART of Korean history and a part of Chinese history but it's NOT Korean or Chinese.
CuriosityRoads 2 months ago
@fucksouthkoreagook oh! ching chong ting tong?!?!?
SirHungryHippo 3 months ago
WHATS THE NAME OF THIS SONG?
Konane117 5 months ago
@Konane117 The song title is Love Story Between Muhyul and Yeon it's already in the video description.
Pikaqiu 2 months ago
What's the music? BTW, why I can see the Great Wall?
aaa1162 10 months ago
Umm yeah idk about turks becoming Koguryo or anything but...awhile Koguryo was present. Turk was also present as a country. So I don't think Turk, and Koguryo Mix.
Xyeho 10 months ago
korean ancients Kokuryo turkish ancient Kokturk interesting:)
akoc1990 1 year ago
what the name song in this clip? it's so amazing !
theluxifer18 1 year ago
People should know Wa of Japan never was advanced nation at that time. Most of Kofun to Nara era artifacts excavated were all from ancient Korea. Japan was still known to be barbaric until 17th century.
watsupzzful 1 year ago 3
@watsupzzful it's economy and military scale was far more superior to Korea, BUT it's culture was way infeiror compared to the sophisitcated Koreans.
rlatndnsxo 1 year ago
funny
meticulous3 2 years ago
5*****
SkyPacifist 2 years ago 5
Im a big fan of this drama series!
I want to know mora about Goguryeo
pls. help me...
mheljums26 2 years ago 8
kk they were relatively different from todays koeran culture since they still retained the nomadic culture of their ancestor (huns monglos turks) and language would have been comepletely in audible today.l they used the same armor as the Persian aryan ppl both settle and nomadic(look a Saka armor in particular)
kaindrg 1 year ago
also u will notice they have a lot in common iwht iranian aryan culture the brough twith them from their former nomadic was (mean all korean kinddoms applie to thsi statement) becuase if u look at huns and the gold work its iranin influenced the asina nomads offereed bows(bow was primary weapon among acestors of modern east asin ppl other ppl reallied on spear)
kaindrg 1 year ago
so the ancient koreans alwasys had a good gold metalurgy culture producing beautiful piece. in the war with Sui and again with Tang/silla they used japanese mercinaries.
kaindrg 1 year ago
@kaindrg interesting! May I know where u got this information? It is interesting that japanese mercenaries were used in the war :D. Was it only Goguryeo? I assumed Baekje had closer ties to Japan heh and Baekje did use Japanese mercenaries. Did Goguryeo did so too? Since Goguryeo was the furthest in proximity from Japan of all the three kingdoms, I am rather surprised xD. Could you provide a source?
Pikaqiu 1 year ago
@Pikaqiu well for my other comments all i had to do was go to NYC and go to the exibition gallery on afghan aryan hill tombs. and look at armor gold work etc. the other u can get from asian history books actually from the time period of three kingdoms like samguk sagi, nihonshoki, and book of tang and sui.
kaindrg 1 year ago
@Pikaqiu but as a read them it seems more likely that japan was incontrol of shilla nad paekche rather than being paid off as a mercenary country i seem more likely japan was amilitary threat to them idk u should check it out ur self too dont take my word for it. alot of ppl will tell u that might be historical muddling or fiction but idk y would korean sources would want to make u p lost of story of their short commings
kaindrg 1 year ago
@kaindrg Yeah. I need to visit one of those places. A pity that even when i visited korea all they showed me were joseon dynasty ruins. Like Hwaseong and the Gyeongbokgong. Relics of the three kingdoms are rare to come by and I never saw any of them. Save for a Joseon modified silla temple in mt seorak. Anyway alot of korean sources are not really 100% accurate because the japanese burnt 300000 of their books during ww2. Not sure where i got this from cant rmb.
Pikaqiu 1 year ago
@Pikaqiu n ah the samguk sagi wouldnt be burned becacause these reports were written showign japanses pirate as powerful plus even the stele of gwanggaeto in manchuria(around the area of former gogoreyo dominion) reports these same claims andteh japanese left it untouched otehr then a ink rubbing to shwo the meije emperor
kaindrg 1 year ago
@kaindrg
Samguk Sagi never mentions Japanese being "powerful", the script on gwanggaeto could be false since its POV of Goguryeo and that many of the scripts have been touched or damaged purposely.
Hanul91 1 year ago
@Hanul91 explain how.. gogureayo hanji word order and usage were different from tang and japan let alone modern ppl so even if hanji experts from china, korea, and japan came to analyze it they would have trouble reading it since many of the words are used in different context even so that might even make em wrong about the strong japan may be they were just talking about their god king concept who knows,
kaindrg 1 year ago
@kaindrg
If japan was so strong, why haven't they were introduced Iron later in Three kingdoms? The logic doesn't make sense at all plus there are no such proofs of japan being powerful?
Hanul91 1 year ago
@Hanul91 explain how.. gogureayo hanji word order and usage were different from tang and japan let alone modern ppl so even if hanji experts from china, korea, and japan came to analyze it they would have trouble reading it since many of the words are used in different context even so that might even make em wrong about the strong japan may be they were just talking about their god king concept who knows.
kaindrg 1 year ago
@Hanul91 also how come three kingdoms korea never earned the resepct of the chinese hmmm? the japanese were well enuf taht the sui emperor gave him a gold seal while korean nations couldnt even get a copper seal
kaindrg 1 year ago
@kaindrg
That time, the Three Kingdoms didn't have any sort of relationship with Chinese other than commerce. Japan was just a vassal state to Sui and Tang and that's why Chinese emperor named them Wa but Japs refused and took the name "Nippon".
Hanul91 1 year ago
@kaindrg btw baekje was also a close ally of japan. No other korean kingdom has such close relations with japan as baekje.. Its said that the last members of the royal family even fled to japan when Silla conquered baekje..
Pikaqiu 1 year ago
@Pikaqiu yes armor pottery is similar.
kaindrg 1 year ago
@Pikaqiu O i just remeberthe name of the crown i saw at NYC metropilitan museum Tilla tepes crown . it maaybe older than korean models but its similar. it may also give u some insight into how close koreans were with the mongols and huns who were the ones who introduced koreans to metal working via the aryan iranian tribe. silla crown is more ornamental then baekje and gayas and is base on korean's sibearian ancestrial religion symbolizing teh deer or the father tree
kaindrg 1 year ago
@Pikaqiu alsou can notice the paekje armor resembles the bronze and iron armors of the the prehistoric japanese. some korean biases scholars will tell u that its korean influence but japanese models are dated to be alot older. and also before the constant raids by japanese the kindonms of paekje and silla used kogureyo armor(aka iranian aryan armor taught to huns and mongols then to koreans)
kaindrg 1 year ago
@kaindrg
Japanese models never dated older than Korean. Koreans have scythian-siberian influence, not from iran. Remember that is BC era.
Hanul91 1 year ago
@Hanul91 yea scythian are iranic ppls but scythians didnt use thick armor more of parthian sogdinian and saka(and maybe sarmatian)
kaindrg 1 year ago
@kaindrg
I said Scythian-Siberian, not Scythian itself.
Hanul91 1 year ago
@Hanul91 which term would have been more preferable iranians or Aryana either its means iranians beccause all the different tribes collectively called them selves aryan aka iranian. also i forgot to list bactrain before also three kingdoms era spaned from BCE tho the defeat of goguryeo in 668 CE
kaindrg 1 year ago
@kaindrg
I don't understand what you menat by Bactrain?
Hanul91 1 year ago
all the dramas romantacise them they were ok for the time not as fantastic as one would thing tehy controled alot fo filler land taht was later taken by nomads
kaindrg 1 year ago
@mheljums26 you can find it on wikipedia
dulcikutza 5 months ago