Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which popular atheist author Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
and if you believe shortysmagic and abyss 24 there is some bottom land I would like to sell you, right after I log off the Matrix world that we live in.
P.S Sun doesn't have an on/off switch, nor does the zodiac+Sun translate into 12 Apostles +God.
PLEASE CHECK OUT MY UTUBE CHANNEL,(BAMBOOTHEWALK)UTUBE IM WALKING ACROSS AMERICA HELPING THE HOMELESS for every life lost in 911 2001 and our soldiers lost, lets change some ones life im calling all millionaires/billionaires/all celebs/HUMAN BEINGS to walk a mile with me and in that mile help some one so for every life lost is a life gained ARMAND YOUNG(BAMBOOTHEWALK)UTUBE OR MAN WALKS AGROSS AMERICA GOD BLESS R TROOPS IM CALLING ALL ANGELS
i strongly recomend to all of you to watch the movie ZEITGEIST ADDENDUM its here on youtube it shows how money itself is a fraudulent system and is the root cause of most of our social issues.
i hate that video. it's really no better than the issues it claims to adress. it cites nothing that doesn't already have a better counterpoint. its expected that you follow what it says as blindly as it says everyone else follows the lies and conspiricies it claims to have revealed.
o well its quite a bit diferent then the first one. you should check it out, what the movie points out is that there is no denying that the way money works can screw up alot of things, it suggests that we starrt a new world system, all though that system would be based on co-operation which the world as of today can't yet handle after you watch that movie if you do tell me what you think of it.
@shortysmagic It also shows how this fraudulent system, ran by corporations, in affect creates everyone to be a corporation unto themself in this through birth-certificates, driver license, etc.
To all the truthseekers around the world, I warmly reccomend to see the video called Esoteric Agenda... Since youtube won't allow me to post the link... the staggering amount of information gathered in here, in mindblowing. It's the best video I have found so far, If you want you can find it also on video google in one piece (it last 2 hrs), just search for the video called Esoteric Agenda.
And there's also a sequel called Kymatica, made from the same person, Ben Stewart.
Honestly I don't think that by observing and mapping environmental problems we could change the situation in the world. The problem lies much deeper than just in the environment. Ok yeah the environmental problems are really important, but what if WE, or should I say THEY are destroying the environment on purpose?
The answer would still be the same... We the people need to fix the problems..
In presupposing "They" want to destroy the environment, are you expecting "them" to fix it?
By taking responsibility for a problem the power ends up in your hands.
as for chemtrails.. perhaps metallic additives.
search global dimming.
if you compress air like in a jet engine add smoke like from burning jet fuel and then drop the pressure like shooting it out of a jet engine you make a cloud.
As an architect I found the documentary "Grabage Warrior" as just one more way we can change the world for the better. Architects can be blamed for alot of the problems, because Architecture has the potential to really change the world on a large scale. My field has been hijacked by ego maniacs who don't build for people, but for their own fame and fortunes. The Garbage Warrior gives me hope that design and Architecture isn't completely useless yet. I suggest watching it if you haven't already.
The problem is that any good idea that isn't proffitable for the goverments, becasue the gov. doesn't want to facilitate living for people, no it's just the opposite, don't believe anything the goverment says, cause in their humblest interest is that you die, not that you live, less people less problem, ass soon as the majority of people would realise this, the fascist and capitalistic system would collapse, because, people we have the power. But sadly I have a feeling this won't happen so soon.
the domination in the world stands upon the edge of a knife. that's why so much money and effort is spent monitoring public opinion and habits and trying to modify them. a lot of people and a moderate amount of effort [or significantly fewer people and quite a bit more effort] can expose the power structures for what they are. luckily, there are millions of ready people, they just don't know how to unite. THAT should be a focus.
What will make the world a better place is if they invent something to resolve the global ego pandemic that's threatening to overthrow our intelligence.
why are people arguing when we are all on the same team!? check your egos at the door if you want to comment or if you re not interested in making the world a better place go and watch survivor or something...
LOL this guy said 'save the planet'. The planet tries to kill us every chance it gets. If any one of you is dropped butt naked in 90% of the earth's surface, you are dead in 10 minutes.
jfsimard79-yeah! kill the planet before it kills us!
oh wait, then we'll have to figure out how to live on mars.... where 100% of it's service you are dead before you blink.
you might think you're being cute making fun of the "save the planet" thing, but the truth is that we aren't just trying to save humankind. Kill mankind and the planet would thrive. We all contribute to it and need to start taking responsibility for our actions on a massive scale.
Where is it that I said to kill the planet. I'm just pointing out that we tend to romanticize our quest to "save" the earth. One extreme would rather we all commit suicide so that planet earth can heal itself and live in peace, and the other extreme thinks that the earth ain't worth a damn and we should exploit it and pollute it. We must balance our need for production and manufacturing with the need to be "clean" and "green." Neither extreme will work.
@tillo2008 we all contribute?! when was it that anyone asked to be born? who asked for cars televisions and the massive amounts of chemicals released into the atmosphere every day? who asked for nuclear devices? did you call for these major advancements in technology? or where they just already here when you got here? did you make any of this shit? could you even fathom it? stop blaming EVERYBODY! the people responsible are the same ones offering you a solution!
Instant access to info and what others are thinking, via the Internet and phone services, is a precursor to a telepathic society where everyone knows what everyone else is thinking. Very mentally healthy people don't need any secret thoughts; in fact they crave interaction and the benefit of instant help, when needed. This will happen in 4th density, where we are headed.
A huge factor, not referred to here is the orientation of those reincarnating to Earth.
For many years the STS have not been allowed to return here and so they are a dying orientation, on Earth. Of course, this has a huge impact on getting to real solutions to our problems. We have very good reason to be optimistic. Humans have voted to be a STO planet and it is happening.
but, it's become abundantly clear that industrial civilization is not only profoundly unsustainable, but collapsing. his 'solutions' perpetuate alienation and the pervasive omni-surveillance of this culture. fuck that.
No the government plan of AUTO-MOBIL ONLY ROAD that connects to the SUB-URBAN POD HOUSE that you then leave to go to COMMERCIAL IMPORT DISTRIBUTION ZONE after you finished driving from the WORK ONLY AREA that is collapsing. We need more freedom so we can figure out what to do with all of this dumb ass shit the government has built or "regulated" us into building ourselves. Its not industrial civilization that is failing, just the globalized socialist government.
how do you figure it's a globalized socialist government?! far from it. you've perfectly articulated my frustrations with global capitalism above. that is to say, living as a wage-slave in a world divided by class. it's terrible and alienating. besides, i would like to see a society that was governed by the principle: "from each according to their need, to each according to their abilities". the pursuit of profit over people has to go.
Its a social government because government mandate what large portions of the economy will look like. Point out the "class" were is it? All I see is individuals.
And you reveal what you really are. A useless leeching mooch trying to legalize theft.
Your needs do not give you a claim on my ability, nor on any others for that manner. If I can't make it I'll trade for it with what I can make. I'm a very able person so HANDS OFF!
fucking shit, this is pathetic. i've never claimed this, and never would.
i'm not a thief, murderer or slaver. why would you call me this? if anything this describes the current system of theft, muder and slavery.
i don't agree that my needs supercede your abilities. once again, this applies to the ruling class that regards or disregards our dreams, needs and capacities.
oh backpedaling are you? The current system of theft, murder and slavery. Is SOCIALISM!
Capitalism has not existed for almost 100 years now. Just this sad shell of its former glory known as the "Mixed Economy". Start thinking and look at the facts. You know they are calling for regulator regulators now. To make sure the "laws" get "enforced".
Regulations wont fix it, that is obvious, what we need to do is to break up the corporations and allow more competition into the markets to revive capitalism
capitalism as a mode of production remains, and its basic formula, taking in commodities to make more money: MCM is necessarily exploitative, as purchased labor (of the propertyless mass) creates surplus-value that is the profit of the few.
if it's 'free market' capitalism that you're refering to, then that only ever existed in the speeches of politicians. state and capital go hand in hand. coercion, disposession and the rest are inherent in capitalism.
Capitalism is an economic system in which wealth, and the means of producing wealth, are privately owned and controlled rather than publicly or state-owned and controlled. - wiki
Socialism refers to a broad set of economic theories of social organization advocating state or collective ownership and administration of the means of production -wiki
The top one entails freedom because of the whole concept of property right that goes along with it. Property rights are the base of civilization.
now, the judgment that freedom flows from private property is inane. freedom for whom? 9/10ths of those in civilization are indeed propertyless and must enter into a coercive condition of wage-slaver selling their labor, youth, intelligence, strength and waking hours to the alien, hostile other- the proprietor. p.p. is very much the basis of civilization that, denies access to the fruits of the earth that belong to all.
You are a gullible worker ant who has been duped by the powerful. You believe a system makes you "free", which only exists to help the powerful maintain their power.
I am not free. The government (and by government I mean people that use the government to initiate force to get their way) is oppressing me. So I'm stuck paying taxes and having my savings inflated away by dumbasses like you whining for payout programs.
Your needs are not claims on the lives of others. You are the oppressor. You are the problem, not people like me who want freedom from your sick ideas.
also, what you've described clearly exposes the essential dynamics of capitalism. given this period of cyclic economic destruction, the state rushes in to sustain financial and automotive industries to sustain capitalism and the almighty profit. in other words, there never was a time when there was a market economy without the resources of modern state.
as capitalism intensifies and centralizes control at the top, the government becomes evermore directly involved in economics.
Their are only large financial firms that makes cars on the side being fed off of high powered loans from the FED. Intensifies at the top. That is socialism.
You need to read history and not Marx. Overproduction in capitalism? no no. you have to have a state screaming "MORE CARS" for that to happen. No real capitalist would make more product than their was a market for. Just look at the buggy whip industry! It used to be huge.
for what it's worth, i would suggest reading marx's 1848 economic manuscripts, the manifesto and volume one of capital (das kapital) to understand where im coming from and how the critique of capitalism is so relevant to today.
Marx just like you couldn't even keep the meaning of his words stable enough to get a concept fully formed. Its just fog.
All the people should have all the worlds stuff free because the wealth of the world is "natural". Resources are nothing until man thinks of a use for them.
how?
Blackout. The mental fog rolls in.
Don't ever come around my chicken coup yammerin about the peoples chicken.
wtf is 'collectivism' anyways? marx never uses that word. and it's an untenable denial of social life.
if by collectivism, it is meant the interdependance and solidarity of the human race in general, and the working class specifically then you'd be dolt or capitalist to deny that.
do you mean subjecting the individual to the crushing demands of the ruling class, industry, state and money? capitalism does that already as it is.
I'm not sure if you have a correct understanding of the collectivist philosophy seeing as Marx's social classes are purely collectivist.
Collectivism is a philosophy that groups individuals and says the "good" of the group of is more important than the individual. This kind of thinking strips individuals of rights and leads to majoritarian (totalitarian) rule.
Collectivist philosophy was sowed deep in the Soviet Union (arguably still is), Cuba, and Nazi Germany to name a few. What you saw
happen is the destruction of human life because individualist philosophy was suppressed, often with a gun.
Collectivism, Marxism, Communism, Statism lead to the destruction of human life, human progress and human flourishment.
Individualism and the liberty to pursue ones own self-interest, without the use of coercion (state governments) lead to prosperity and better standard of living.
this talk is 3 years old! i think humanity should just commit mass suicide. nuke the planet. no more suffering. no more problems. ever. it's extreme, i know, but, it is an absolute solution. the only thing really stopping us is personal fear when we all die eventually anyway.
Counter-productive implies a goal. What is our goal? Existing itself isn't a goal because it's a given.
The only reason we want to improve the planet is because we live in it. That is the problem. The planet will eventually be unable to support life no matter what. So in a way, preserving the planet is counter-productive.
A proven factor huh? Got a citation for that? (Note I said 'a' cause not 'the' cause. Things have more than 1 cause)
I'd say that the increase in GPD causes increase phone ownership. Phone ownership is just one of the many things that increased as GPD increases. I'm sure protein consumption and swimming-pool installations are in the same bracket.
You still misunderstand and define it as a cause. It's not a cause. It's a correlation, as in there is a positive correlation between GDP increase and phone ownership. Look up 'correlation'.
I suggest you watch the video again. He doesn't say they correlate, he says mobile phones are a cause of increasing GDP. In fact, his thesis turns on that point.
7:39 "a study last year shows a direct correlation between the growth of mobile phone use and subsequent to GDP increases across Africa"
You're being defensively thick-headed. I suggest you get over your original interpretation. Besides, his point is that phones can be used more interactively in regards to environmental concerns.
Congrats on chopping off the immediately preceding words "mobile phones have become an economic driver" NOT "growing economies drive mobile phone uptake".The study accurately (and unsurprisingly) observes correlation between phone usage and growing economies. He interprets that correlation backwards and wrongly.
You win the creationist award for brilliant quote mining.
And yet ironically the mobile phone is a perfect example of how technology is not under our control, and is chronically under-analyzed. This is not the same as solving problems, it just adds more complexity, and more vectors for more problems. This is such a typical mental trap that many "futurists" fall into.
Define "control". Would you say that an oil spill for example is a desirable function of oil tanker technology? Is gridlock an intentional aspect of transportation infrastructure? Or perhaps a more classical example; asbestos was once thought to be a miracle home insulation product. There are always unintended consequences that represent a lack of control. In a connected world technology isn't passive, in many instances it competes with us for survival.
I think you missed the point of my original statement. Which is that the problems are not always immediately evident, ie. asbestos. But if you really want a direct answer; lithium mobile phone batteries are an extreme environmental hazard, due to the lack of proper disposal and proliferation the result is environmental contamination. Additionally 3-4 million songbirds are killed annually due to collisions with cell towers. We live in a connected, holistic world, nothing happens in a vacuum.
This has been flagged as spam show
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which popular atheist author Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
lightandbeautiful 1 week ago
Comment removed
lightandbeautiful 1 week ago in playlist Uploaded videos
5:08 What is the device on the right called? I've been looking to get one for my family.
noonej 10 months ago
His name is never in French... kinda weird to me.
kingericio 1 year ago
WELL DONE!!!
This should be shown the same way sex education and drivers education is shown in schools.
AWESOME
happy2b123 1 year ago
and if you believe shortysmagic and abyss 24 there is some bottom land I would like to sell you, right after I log off the Matrix world that we live in.
P.S Sun doesn't have an on/off switch, nor does the zodiac+Sun translate into 12 Apostles +God.
Keravnosoeoeoe 2 years ago
what are you talking about?
shortysmagic 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE CHECK OUT MY UTUBE CHANNEL,(BAMBOOTHEWALK)UTUBE IM WALKING ACROSS AMERICA HELPING THE HOMELESS for every life lost in 911 2001 and our soldiers lost, lets change some ones life im calling all millionaires/billionaires/all celebs/HUMAN BEINGS to walk a mile with me and in that mile help some one so for every life lost is a life gained ARMAND YOUNG(BAMBOOTHEWALK)UTUBE OR MAN WALKS AGROSS AMERICA GOD BLESS R TROOPS IM CALLING ALL ANGELS
BAMBOOTHEWALK 2 years ago
i strongly recomend to all of you to watch the movie ZEITGEIST ADDENDUM its here on youtube it shows how money itself is a fraudulent system and is the root cause of most of our social issues.
shortysmagic 2 years ago 11
i hate that video. it's really no better than the issues it claims to adress. it cites nothing that doesn't already have a better counterpoint. its expected that you follow what it says as blindly as it says everyone else follows the lies and conspiricies it claims to have revealed.
cynicalprophet 2 years ago
my apologies i thought you were talking about the origonal zeitgeist movie. i have not seen the second one and therefore cannot really criticize it.
cynicalprophet 2 years ago
o well its quite a bit diferent then the first one. you should check it out, what the movie points out is that there is no denying that the way money works can screw up alot of things, it suggests that we starrt a new world system, all though that system would be based on co-operation which the world as of today can't yet handle after you watch that movie if you do tell me what you think of it.
shortysmagic 2 years ago
@shortysmagic It also shows how this fraudulent system, ran by corporations, in affect creates everyone to be a corporation unto themself in this through birth-certificates, driver license, etc.
LazyOtaku 1 year ago
To all the truthseekers around the world, I warmly reccomend to see the video called Esoteric Agenda... Since youtube won't allow me to post the link... the staggering amount of information gathered in here, in mindblowing. It's the best video I have found so far, If you want you can find it also on video google in one piece (it last 2 hrs), just search for the video called Esoteric Agenda.
And there's also a sequel called Kymatica, made from the same person, Ben Stewart.
abysss24 2 years ago
Honestly I don't think that by observing and mapping environmental problems we could change the situation in the world. The problem lies much deeper than just in the environment. Ok yeah the environmental problems are really important, but what if WE, or should I say THEY are destroying the environment on purpose?
Ever heard of HAARP or about the chemtrails?
abysss24 2 years ago
The answer would still be the same... We the people need to fix the problems..
In presupposing "They" want to destroy the environment, are you expecting "them" to fix it?
By taking responsibility for a problem the power ends up in your hands.
as for chemtrails.. perhaps metallic additives.
search global dimming.
if you compress air like in a jet engine add smoke like from burning jet fuel and then drop the pressure like shooting it out of a jet engine you make a cloud.
abram730 2 years ago
There is always someone coughing in the background during TED talks. It always sounds like the same person.
neolestat13 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
What we need to see is how money circulates
in a society, which is the base of society
see Silvio Gesells book
The Natural Economic Order
silvio-gesellpointde
jemjemde 3 years ago
What we need to see is how money circulates
in a society, which is the base of society
see Silvio Gesells book
The Natural Economic Order
silvio-gesellpointde
jemjemde 3 years ago 2
As an architect I found the documentary "Grabage Warrior" as just one more way we can change the world for the better. Architects can be blamed for alot of the problems, because Architecture has the potential to really change the world on a large scale. My field has been hijacked by ego maniacs who don't build for people, but for their own fame and fortunes. The Garbage Warrior gives me hope that design and Architecture isn't completely useless yet. I suggest watching it if you haven't already.
ChoasTheory2000 3 years ago
The problem is that any good idea that isn't proffitable for the goverments, becasue the gov. doesn't want to facilitate living for people, no it's just the opposite, don't believe anything the goverment says, cause in their humblest interest is that you die, not that you live, less people less problem, ass soon as the majority of people would realise this, the fascist and capitalistic system would collapse, because, people we have the power. But sadly I have a feeling this won't happen so soon.
abysss24 3 years ago
Comment removed
cocky3001 3 years ago
the domination in the world stands upon the edge of a knife. that's why so much money and effort is spent monitoring public opinion and habits and trying to modify them. a lot of people and a moderate amount of effort [or significantly fewer people and quite a bit more effort] can expose the power structures for what they are. luckily, there are millions of ready people, they just don't know how to unite. THAT should be a focus.
intrepgun 2 years ago
What will make the world a better place is if they invent something to resolve the global ego pandemic that's threatening to overthrow our intelligence.
mermadeinheaven 3 years ago 3
I don't know the original message your responding too, but if you think about it, in some situations, that's the best choice.
chick5581 3 years ago
why are people arguing when we are all on the same team!? check your egos at the door if you want to comment or if you re not interested in making the world a better place go and watch survivor or something...
topstot 3 years ago 7
The above post contains: Truth, and Win.
Really, take your arguments else where, please. I would like to see more posts about Saving the Planet, rather than arguing about cell phones.
thatsmamayoshi2 3 years ago
I despise people who work 'word for word' from a script. This guy need to stop reading and start speaking to the crowd.
HumanStrategy 3 years ago 2
Listen to his voice - that slight little quaver lets you know that he's nervous. Kudos to him for being up there at all.
jag305 3 years ago
Sorry, taking pictures of the problem is supposed to fix it? Gibberis
cromicus 3 years ago 2
the problem with dependence on digital technology is that it is very fragile.
Solar Max (nuff said)
Atoyota 3 years ago 2
LOL this guy said 'save the planet'. The planet tries to kill us every chance it gets. If any one of you is dropped butt naked in 90% of the earth's surface, you are dead in 10 minutes.
jfsimard79 3 years ago
jfsimard79-yeah! kill the planet before it kills us!
oh wait, then we'll have to figure out how to live on mars.... where 100% of it's service you are dead before you blink.
you might think you're being cute making fun of the "save the planet" thing, but the truth is that we aren't just trying to save humankind. Kill mankind and the planet would thrive. We all contribute to it and need to start taking responsibility for our actions on a massive scale.
tillo2008 3 years ago
Where is it that I said to kill the planet. I'm just pointing out that we tend to romanticize our quest to "save" the earth. One extreme would rather we all commit suicide so that planet earth can heal itself and live in peace, and the other extreme thinks that the earth ain't worth a damn and we should exploit it and pollute it. We must balance our need for production and manufacturing with the need to be "clean" and "green." Neither extreme will work.
jfsimard79 3 years ago
@tillo2008 we all contribute?! when was it that anyone asked to be born? who asked for cars televisions and the massive amounts of chemicals released into the atmosphere every day? who asked for nuclear devices? did you call for these major advancements in technology? or where they just already here when you got here? did you make any of this shit? could you even fathom it? stop blaming EVERYBODY! the people responsible are the same ones offering you a solution!
niddasa 9 months ago
Instant access to info and what others are thinking, via the Internet and phone services, is a precursor to a telepathic society where everyone knows what everyone else is thinking. Very mentally healthy people don't need any secret thoughts; in fact they crave interaction and the benefit of instant help, when needed. This will happen in 4th density, where we are headed.
rollsthepaul 3 years ago
A huge factor, not referred to here is the orientation of those reincarnating to Earth.
For many years the STS have not been allowed to return here and so they are a dying orientation, on Earth. Of course, this has a huge impact on getting to real solutions to our problems. We have very good reason to be optimistic. Humans have voted to be a STO planet and it is happening.
rollsthepaul 3 years ago
this guy's the prophet of technotopia.
but, it's become abundantly clear that industrial civilization is not only profoundly unsustainable, but collapsing. his 'solutions' perpetuate alienation and the pervasive omni-surveillance of this culture. fuck that.
mikezephyr 3 years ago
I agree.
13gi0n 3 years ago
No the government plan of AUTO-MOBIL ONLY ROAD that connects to the SUB-URBAN POD HOUSE that you then leave to go to COMMERCIAL IMPORT DISTRIBUTION ZONE after you finished driving from the WORK ONLY AREA that is collapsing. We need more freedom so we can figure out what to do with all of this dumb ass shit the government has built or "regulated" us into building ourselves. Its not industrial civilization that is failing, just the globalized socialist government.
BanjoNaps 3 years ago
how do you figure it's a globalized socialist government?! far from it. you've perfectly articulated my frustrations with global capitalism above. that is to say, living as a wage-slave in a world divided by class. it's terrible and alienating. besides, i would like to see a society that was governed by the principle: "from each according to their need, to each according to their abilities". the pursuit of profit over people has to go.
mikezephyr 3 years ago
Call it what it is... You just quoted Karl Marx, What you want is Communism.
Just ADMIT IT, your a communist.
Darthwillburr 3 years ago 4
by all means.
mikezephyr 3 years ago
except your own right?
BanjoNaps 3 years ago
Its a social government because government mandate what large portions of the economy will look like. Point out the "class" were is it? All I see is individuals.
And you reveal what you really are. A useless leeching mooch trying to legalize theft.
Your needs do not give you a claim on my ability, nor on any others for that manner. If I can't make it I'll trade for it with what I can make. I'm a very able person so HANDS OFF!
THIEF! MURDER! SLAVER!
YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE!
BanjoNaps 3 years ago
fucking shit, this is pathetic. i've never claimed this, and never would.
i'm not a thief, murderer or slaver. why would you call me this? if anything this describes the current system of theft, muder and slavery.
i don't agree that my needs supercede your abilities. once again, this applies to the ruling class that regards or disregards our dreams, needs and capacities.
jesus christ monkey balls!
mikezephyr 3 years ago
oh backpedaling are you? The current system of theft, murder and slavery. Is SOCIALISM!
Capitalism has not existed for almost 100 years now. Just this sad shell of its former glory known as the "Mixed Economy". Start thinking and look at the facts. You know they are calling for regulator regulators now. To make sure the "laws" get "enforced".
BanjoNaps 3 years ago
Regulations wont fix it, that is obvious, what we need to do is to break up the corporations and allow more competition into the markets to revive capitalism
Darthwillburr 3 years ago
All we need to do is to stop asking the government to initiate force on our behalf, it requires consent.
The fortune 500 would not last a day with out their government life line.
BanjoNaps 3 years ago
im not mincing my words here.
capitalism as a mode of production remains, and its basic formula, taking in commodities to make more money: MCM is necessarily exploitative, as purchased labor (of the propertyless mass) creates surplus-value that is the profit of the few.
if it's 'free market' capitalism that you're refering to, then that only ever existed in the speeches of politicians. state and capital go hand in hand. coercion, disposession and the rest are inherent in capitalism.
mikezephyr 3 years ago
Capitalism is an economic system in which wealth, and the means of producing wealth, are privately owned and controlled rather than publicly or state-owned and controlled. - wiki
Socialism refers to a broad set of economic theories of social organization advocating state or collective ownership and administration of the means of production -wiki
The top one entails freedom because of the whole concept of property right that goes along with it. Property rights are the base of civilization.
BanjoNaps 3 years ago
the above defintions are correct, succinct.
now, the judgment that freedom flows from private property is inane. freedom for whom? 9/10ths of those in civilization are indeed propertyless and must enter into a coercive condition of wage-slaver selling their labor, youth, intelligence, strength and waking hours to the alien, hostile other- the proprietor. p.p. is very much the basis of civilization that, denies access to the fruits of the earth that belong to all.
mikezephyr 3 years ago
Don't ever come around my chicken coup yammerin about the peoples chicken.
I disagree with you and do not give moral sanction to what you are trying to do to the world.
BanjoNaps 3 years ago
You are a gullible worker ant who has been duped by the powerful. You believe a system makes you "free", which only exists to help the powerful maintain their power.
myxomata 3 years ago
I am not free. The government (and by government I mean people that use the government to initiate force to get their way) is oppressing me. So I'm stuck paying taxes and having my savings inflated away by dumbasses like you whining for payout programs.
Your needs are not claims on the lives of others. You are the oppressor. You are the problem, not people like me who want freedom from your sick ideas.
BanjoNaps 3 years ago
also, what you've described clearly exposes the essential dynamics of capitalism. given this period of cyclic economic destruction, the state rushes in to sustain financial and automotive industries to sustain capitalism and the almighty profit. in other words, there never was a time when there was a market economy without the resources of modern state.
as capitalism intensifies and centralizes control at the top, the government becomes evermore directly involved in economics.
mikezephyr 3 years ago
AHHAHA! Automotive companies!??!
What automotive companies!!?!?!?
Their are only large financial firms that makes cars on the side being fed off of high powered loans from the FED. Intensifies at the top. That is socialism.
You need to read history and not Marx. Overproduction in capitalism? no no. you have to have a state screaming "MORE CARS" for that to happen. No real capitalist would make more product than their was a market for. Just look at the buggy whip industry! It used to be huge.
BanjoNaps 3 years ago
for what it's worth, i would suggest reading marx's 1848 economic manuscripts, the manifesto and volume one of capital (das kapital) to understand where im coming from and how the critique of capitalism is so relevant to today.
mikezephyr 3 years ago
Marx just like you couldn't even keep the meaning of his words stable enough to get a concept fully formed. Its just fog.
All the people should have all the worlds stuff free because the wealth of the world is "natural". Resources are nothing until man thinks of a use for them.
how?
Blackout. The mental fog rolls in.
Don't ever come around my chicken coup yammerin about the peoples chicken.
BanjoNaps 3 years ago
The collectivist undertones are intense! Pure Marxist ideology.
rickysles 3 years ago
wtf is 'collectivism' anyways? marx never uses that word. and it's an untenable denial of social life.
if by collectivism, it is meant the interdependance and solidarity of the human race in general, and the working class specifically then you'd be dolt or capitalist to deny that.
do you mean subjecting the individual to the crushing demands of the ruling class, industry, state and money? capitalism does that already as it is.
so fucking lame.
mikezephyr 3 years ago
I'm not sure if you have a correct understanding of the collectivist philosophy seeing as Marx's social classes are purely collectivist.
Collectivism is a philosophy that groups individuals and says the "good" of the group of is more important than the individual. This kind of thinking strips individuals of rights and leads to majoritarian (totalitarian) rule.
Collectivist philosophy was sowed deep in the Soviet Union (arguably still is), Cuba, and Nazi Germany to name a few. What you saw
rickysles 3 years ago
happen is the destruction of human life because individualist philosophy was suppressed, often with a gun.
Collectivism, Marxism, Communism, Statism lead to the destruction of human life, human progress and human flourishment.
Individualism and the liberty to pursue ones own self-interest, without the use of coercion (state governments) lead to prosperity and better standard of living.
rickysles 3 years ago
As my uncle used to say. Don't let me catch you sneaking around my hen house yammerin about the people's chicken.
BanjoNaps 3 years ago
I noticed the way he talks, makes me tune out. I can't pay attention for more than 2 minutes, and my attention focus is usually very strong.
People should be trained how to talk to a large public, especially orators.
De4sher 3 years ago
you didn't miss much btw. in a nut shell: cell-phones are everywhere, so why don't you snap a picture of a clearcut, you'll be a part of 'progress'.
mikezephyr 3 years ago
'so we can model the future of the climate'
yeah.. this is where I stopped the video. Modelling the climate is about as huge a project as modelling the brain. So, no.
methoxyroxy 3 years ago
33th comment, and I think this person should talk faster, and/or the video sped up.
redmapleleaf 3 years ago
Or, maybe, just maybe, you should work on lengthening your attention span. Just a fun alternative to your suggestions.
zbambam5 3 years ago 3
Dude. You are everywhere! I've seen your comments in the last 3 videos I watched.
:D
riversonthemoon 3 years ago 2
Who do you mean?
redmapleleaf 3 years ago
Who do you mean?
redmapleleaf 3 years ago
I meant zbambam5.
riversonthemoon 3 years ago
This guys voice sounds like the windows text-to-speech voice when you turn down the pitch and up the speed! It's uncanny! :D
Tanru2000 3 years ago 2
less. people.on.the.planet.
nvcn86 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
27th!!!!!!!!!11 And this video is gay!!!!!
1trip711 3 years ago
If we are ever going to preserve this planet I think we need to lower our emissions at any cost. How could that possibly be counter productive?
00boyscout00 3 years ago
this talk is 3 years old! i think humanity should just commit mass suicide. nuke the planet. no more suffering. no more problems. ever. it's extreme, i know, but, it is an absolute solution. the only thing really stopping us is personal fear when we all die eventually anyway.
GaddingImp 3 years ago
No, that is counter productive.. As a society that is capable of destroying ourselves; we are trying not to.. Lol
00boyscout00 3 years ago
Counter-productive implies a goal. What is our goal? Existing itself isn't a goal because it's a given.
The only reason we want to improve the planet is because we live in it. That is the problem. The planet will eventually be unable to support life no matter what. So in a way, preserving the planet is counter-productive.
GaddingImp 3 years ago
People like you uses to talk without a time frame, that's why they talk so much counter-productive things.
code933k 3 years ago
Good point neo. We are all inextricably interconnected; I agree with your point now.
buckfush12 3 years ago
This guys mobile phone spiel is so dumb. He seriously thinks mobile phones are a cause of the increase in African GDP?
I'd bet my left testicle that it's the increase in GDP that is letting people buy mobile phones.
petfoodonly 3 years ago
before you make a judgement about something being dumb, you should make sure your point is right.
correlation doesn't mean cause. he doesn't think it's the cause, but it's a proven factor.
GaddingImp 3 years ago
A proven factor huh? Got a citation for that? (Note I said 'a' cause not 'the' cause. Things have more than 1 cause)
I'd say that the increase in GPD causes increase phone ownership. Phone ownership is just one of the many things that increased as GPD increases. I'm sure protein consumption and swimming-pool installations are in the same bracket.
petfoodonly 3 years ago
Citation: this video.
You still misunderstand and define it as a cause. It's not a cause. It's a correlation, as in there is a positive correlation between GDP increase and phone ownership. Look up 'correlation'.
GaddingImp 3 years ago
I suggest you watch the video again. He doesn't say they correlate, he says mobile phones are a cause of increasing GDP. In fact, his thesis turns on that point.
petfoodonly 3 years ago
7:39 "a study last year shows a direct correlation between the growth of mobile phone use and subsequent to GDP increases across Africa"
You're being defensively thick-headed. I suggest you get over your original interpretation. Besides, his point is that phones can be used more interactively in regards to environmental concerns.
GaddingImp 3 years ago
Congrats on chopping off the immediately preceding words "mobile phones have become an economic driver" NOT "growing economies drive mobile phone uptake".The study accurately (and unsurprisingly) observes correlation between phone usage and growing economies. He interprets that correlation backwards and wrongly.
You win the creationist award for brilliant quote mining.
petfoodonly 3 years ago
After I have destroyed your points, you resort to sarcasm in desperation. Good luck on your ignorance.
GaddingImp 3 years ago
Yes, because quoting the sentence which shows you're wrong is a desperate argument.
Sigh, there's one born every minute.
petfoodonly 3 years ago
Another great talk by Jamais. Thank you TED.
There is much more on Human Progress at:
Thoughtware (dot) TV.
thoughtwaretv 3 years ago
very sweet!
flapjacks3276 3 years ago
The irony of us doing this then an astroid plowing into earth killing everyone.
UlyssesBreckenridge 3 years ago
and thats what we can call pessimism... hilarious!
xinlo 3 years ago 4
You don't even need to wait for an asteroid. There are plenty of things right here on earth ready to kill us at a moment's notice.
Mrmoc7 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
first
lilcryingangel 3 years ago
hahaha
homermoo 3 years ago
37th!
lilcryingangel 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
suck
1trip711 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fucking 9th
semiliteratedgod 3 years ago
Yo, make earthwitness happen!
I am down and I am sure like everyone else who isn't crazy is too, lol.
All the best
californiabonfire 3 years ago
And yet ironically the mobile phone is a perfect example of how technology is not under our control, and is chronically under-analyzed. This is not the same as solving problems, it just adds more complexity, and more vectors for more problems. This is such a typical mental trap that many "futurists" fall into.
neotoy 3 years ago
What is an example of "not under our control."
buckfush12 3 years ago
Define "control". Would you say that an oil spill for example is a desirable function of oil tanker technology? Is gridlock an intentional aspect of transportation infrastructure? Or perhaps a more classical example; asbestos was once thought to be a miracle home insulation product. There are always unintended consequences that represent a lack of control. In a connected world technology isn't passive, in many instances it competes with us for survival.
neotoy 3 years ago
What are some of the problems that have been caused by mobile phones?
Mrmoc7 3 years ago
I think you missed the point of my original statement. Which is that the problems are not always immediately evident, ie. asbestos. But if you really want a direct answer; lithium mobile phone batteries are an extreme environmental hazard, due to the lack of proper disposal and proliferation the result is environmental contamination. Additionally 3-4 million songbirds are killed annually due to collisions with cell towers. We live in a connected, holistic world, nothing happens in a vacuum.
neotoy 3 years ago
Great Vid ;D
Khamila1 3 years ago
why doesn't it exist yet? I'm willing to try...
yellowmellowzz 3 years ago
are you also willing to try sucking his ass?
semiliteratedgod 3 years ago
brilliant
r5768 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3 rd !!!! jiji
ripgoku 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
second!
recognizetrill 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1st!
garvess 3 years ago