pros: ecoboost engine from the ford f150, good safty ratings
cons: boxy, slow, failed wind tunnel tests; ecoboost doesn't help, high flip risk, fuel economy may be poor even with a V6 that gives you 4-banger fuel economy (the engine's only good in a F150)
I'm a bit disappointed by Americans being all about the eco boost. It's just turbocharged engine with variable camshaft timing. The problem is, American cars were perfect - robust, reliable, with higher consumption, because of the great reliability. This eco boost just adds more electronics to the engine and makes it more complicated. I'm european, I drive E90 BMW and I know what I'm talking about. Simplicity and reliability were things I liked on american cars.
I have a 2010 flex and I was wondering how are you getting 23.4 mpg , I am only getting 19.4 and I am not putting my foot in it. Any help is appreciated...
@InUrGirlPockets It's all about when, where and how you drive. Light-footing is part of it, but it's also important to maximize inertia. Driving in stop-and-go traffic will always take its toll on fuel-efficiency in a conventional (non-hybrid) car. Highway speeds have a big effect, too. We test at an average of 68 MPH on the highway ... going faster is likely to lower the MPG figures and attract the attention of the law. Our highway speed limits top out at 65 MPH around these parts. :/
Yeah, I rented a Flex for about a week earlier this year, and it was nice. One car I actually like a lot, is the Buick Lacrosse, and I am not a Buick guy at all (I'm not over the age of 50). The interior is pretty incredible. Road noise is low. It has a luxury look for about half the price. Looks like Lincoln and Buick are trying a bit for the younger crowd.
kind of hard to tell the 60mph mark from the angle, I feel like I'm hitting 60 at 50mph because of the offset. I get around 8 seconds. That about correct for these Flexs?
ive got one handles better then you think sounds way better then on the computer and spins the tires really easy lol great car i love the sony speakers and looks and how you become a part of a flex community and you wave when you see another funner then it sounds
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
About 9 seconds. It's angled from the side so it looks like it hits 60 sooner than it really does. Just google the time it's officially 8.8 seconds or so.
like the sound of the engine shifting is off....the engine is at high rpm then you hear the engine low down but the rpm is still in the high area....maybe its the video camra. idk
The tach isn't off. The Audio/video sync is off. If you watch some of his others they are like that too. I guess the camera somehow messes up the sync.
i got a 2010 flex 5 weeks agao i like it just a few small problems (the d pillar was scratched when i got it and the crome trim under the windo doesnt fight perfictly) but i still love and looking at it what model do you have and how do you like it i have a fwd sel with out ecoboost
the reason the transmission shifts like that is because it is the 6f35 transmission. these cars are not meant for balls the wall performance. ford doesnt do that because they know its not the biggest market out there with the way the economy is. the transmission is meant to be ass smooth as possible of a shift. that 6f35 and the 6f50 in the explorers are meant for comfort. now obviously they make the mustang and gt and any other performance vehicle, but those are meant for that not a damn flex
Wow you are really a dumbass arent you? I bet your one of those people who think Toyota and honda are the only cars that get good gas milage. The fusion hybrid can manage at least 40mpg, the focus gets over 35mpg, the Mustang V6 gets 28mpg, the GT version somewhere around 22 ish... you saying these are bad numbers? Even the Expedition I drive gets decent mileage for such a huge, older car. (13 city/18highway) with the 4.6L V8 in our 2003 Expedition.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
What is wrong with you people, you actually think 13/18 is decent? That is horrible, in Germany all of there vehicles are getting over 60 mpg. Of course Americans think they have to be Mr. and Mrs. Big time with their big vehicles. This is the whole problem with the Greed of the American people.
Oh shut up. If you read what I said, I said for SUCH A BIG VEHICLE its not that bad. And I know for a fact all the Audis, BMWs, Opels etc are NOT getting over 60mpg so stop lying and pulling that shit outta your ass. And alot of americans didnt/dont buy SUVs because they wanted to be "big time" they have big families, and travel, and need the room. not to mention its nice having that room when you need it. How is it being greedy exactly? I can say that BMW owners are greedy. expensive cars
I don't have anything against BMWs, I said that as an example, ( ie- disclaimer, that was a sarcastic comment). I never said BMWs are bad, just not getting 60MPG across the entire lineup. But the point remains, people dont NEED to spend upwards of $50k for a nice car. The 2010 Ford Fusion is an excellent car, and well equipped, is in the mid 20s! Stop being anti-american, your arguments don't hold water.
@rudolphna54 Don't generalize people. Not all BMW owners are greedy. I have one, I love it, but i'm not greedy. I'm just good at saving my money and not blowing it like the average person does.
What's the problem with people buying large vehicles to haul people/stuff even if it's only occasionally? That's called FREEDOM, why ridicule people just because they make a different choice than you? I drive a supercharged 3.8 Buick that gets 30mpg on the highway, so bigger engine doesn't necessarily equate to bad mpg.
woow woow woow, first of all, cars in germany are the most tiny cars ever!!! i mean i could fit one of ur cars in my pocket... secondly, 18 mpg is acually great for an suv that size with that big of an engine. My lincoln aviator is half the size and it gets about 22 mpg on highway when im doin bout 60ish, u dont know what da hell ur talkin bout bitch!!!!!!
Wow, really? Thats the best you could come up with? "STFU you fat american"? Wow, for one thing, I'm not fat. Second of all, I'm sorry, but that isn't a good response to any of my points. It just shows your ignorance, and you have no good comeback to my argument, so just go troll somewhere else.
@MoxleyMauser With Ford, it's about how you drive them. I have an old Ford Taurus Wagon, a big car but not huge, and not making very much power, yet we were averaging 11L/100km (21MPG) in normal driving (which after owning a diesel smart car seems retarded). Despite being almost 4000 pounds with what we had in it, 11 years old, and almost 300000kms, the other day I achieved 7.5L/100km (31 MPG). Our smart car, however averaged 4L/100km or 60MPG.
@MoxleyMauser With Ford, it's about how you drive them. I have an old Ford Taurus Wagon, a big car but not huge, and not making very much power, yet we were averaging 11L/100km (21MPG) in normal driving (which after owning a diesel smart car seems retarded). Despite being almost 4000 pounds with what we had in it, 11 years old, and almost 300000kms, the other day I achieved 7.5L/100km (31 MPG). Our smart car, however averaged 4L/100km or 60MPG.
@MoxleyMauser With Ford, it's about how you drive them. I have an old Ford Taurus Wagon, a big car but not huge, and not making very much power, yet we were averaging 11L/100km (21MPG) in normal driving (which after owning a diesel smart car seems retarded). Despite being almost 4000 pounds with what we had in it, 11 years old, and almost 300000kms, the other day I achieved 7.5L/100km (31 MPG). Our smart car, however averaged 4L/100km or 60MPG.
hah you got that right.. and you see the magazines complaining... OH it feels really sluggish ONLY gets to 60mph in like 8.9 seconds. Think 20 years ago when the retarded cars of the " fuel crisis " barely made 130 horsepower. 13 seconds was considered pretty good lol :P just as an example.
A 9 second 0-60 is like... its quick, but enough to get out into traffic or merge on a interstate off an exit ramp, and good enough for passing. But not in any way a fast car. Even the Civic is getting pretty dang quick these days with a 7 point something 0-60 time. New Camaro base v6 is coming with just over 300hp, and they say its 0-60 will be under 6 seconds. I'v only driven a few cars built a couple decades ago, they were defenately underpowered.
theirs a 0-80mph video of one up here somwhere if you search. only its the awd version of the CTS. I expect the camaro v6 would be a bit quicker since its a little bit lighter and only being rwd.
i thought they would use the 6.0V8 like in the Pontiac G8. It out runs the Charger Rt. beats its 0-60..They might use the 6.0V8 in like a Base V8 model. and use the 6.2V8 that the GXP G8 has too... I dont know they will prob use the same power setup as the G8 i BEt with the 3engines.
Its coming with two different 6.2 LS3's. One of them is the regular LS3, but the other one is being called the L99 coming with the 6 speed auto, it has active fuel managment while the regular LS3 doesn't. They show different HP ratings between the two, but GM tends to under-rate the power output of an engine in something other than the Vette so they could be the same 430hp LS3.
It wouldn't make any difference in fuel consumption. If you look around on Corvette forums and such. A huge number of Vette owners with the LS1 to LS3 v8's have gotten 30+mpg pretty easy on the highway and average in the low 20's. Car engines are getting more efficient, even the big cubed v8's are but most cars are getting heavier and that takes away from the possible increase in fuel economy. Put that same LS3 vette engine in a truck or SUV and it will struggle to average anymore than 15mpg.
less power does not necessarily mean more MPG. most people would rather have some punch, especially for merging on the highway. A wimpy 1.6L 4 cylinder wouldnt cut it in a vehicle this size. It gets good gas mileage with the V6.
This has been flagged as spam show
pros: ecoboost engine from the ford f150, good safty ratings
cons: boxy, slow, failed wind tunnel tests; ecoboost doesn't help, high flip risk, fuel economy may be poor even with a V6 that gives you 4-banger fuel economy (the engine's only good in a F150)
jason123456789210 1 week ago
I'm a bit disappointed by Americans being all about the eco boost. It's just turbocharged engine with variable camshaft timing. The problem is, American cars were perfect - robust, reliable, with higher consumption, because of the great reliability. This eco boost just adds more electronics to the engine and makes it more complicated. I'm european, I drive E90 BMW and I know what I'm talking about. Simplicity and reliability were things I liked on american cars.
paladinrulez 3 weeks ago
Go Chevy!
dawsonhhr 4 weeks ago
video and sound are off by about 1-2 seconds
03silvermustang 2 months ago
My Flex sucks MAJOR gas if you are sitting/idling, esp with AC on. That was the most surprising gas use for the vehicle.
willburr 5 months ago
Comment removed
chrisma2 3 months ago
get the awd ecoboost or not my family has the standard limited and that thing gets off the line fast
hoagieman26 6 months ago
i drove one of these and put the pedal to the metal and it went nowere near as fast as this that thing was so slow,.
wowshiqptar 6 months ago
Comment removed
chrisma2 3 months ago
Flex rules I get 18 under less then efficent driving that 80% city.
yellowcow13 9 months ago
Is it good to always drive my Ford Flex hard like in the video, I lease them so I don't care about repairs.
austinman1995 1 year ago
thats crazy fast v6 alone, cant imagine the ecoboost addition
praetorian2150 1 year ago
I have a 2010 flex and I was wondering how are you getting 23.4 mpg , I am only getting 19.4 and I am not putting my foot in it. Any help is appreciated...
InUrGirlPockets 1 year ago
@InUrGirlPockets It's all about when, where and how you drive. Light-footing is part of it, but it's also important to maximize inertia. Driving in stop-and-go traffic will always take its toll on fuel-efficiency in a conventional (non-hybrid) car. Highway speeds have a big effect, too. We test at an average of 68 MPH on the highway ... going faster is likely to lower the MPG figures and attract the attention of the law. Our highway speed limits top out at 65 MPH around these parts. :/
mpgomatic 1 year ago
This car is faster than what I drive. And has far more room.
jet79637 1 year ago
I like what they did with the gauges; they have that 60's cobra look to them.
corvettels9 1 year ago
like the 2nd-3rd gear shift.
BlackAstonMartin 1 year ago
Is the tach response that slow? or is it just the video?
mykatamari 1 year ago
@mykatamari most of mpgomatic's vids have lag in them... if the tach was that unresponsive, it'd be a MAJOR problem lol :)
TexasGunslinger9 1 year ago
@TexasGunslinger9 Aye, there's a group of early 0-60s that were lagged. One day when I have time to spare, I'll tag all the laggards.
mpgomatic 1 year ago
@mpgomatic cool
TexasGunslinger9 1 year ago
shit that's not bad at all..Ford's getting back in the game!
StephenOCCMan 1 year ago
Yeah, I rented a Flex for about a week earlier this year, and it was nice. One car I actually like a lot, is the Buick Lacrosse, and I am not a Buick guy at all (I'm not over the age of 50). The interior is pretty incredible. Road noise is low. It has a luxury look for about half the price. Looks like Lincoln and Buick are trying a bit for the younger crowd.
VenetianIsle 1 year ago
i wasnt really a ford guy, till the flex came out ;) now i absolutely love fords
xvrhernandez349 1 year ago
I like buicks!
youngbleeb 1 year ago
I got a 7.55 second 0-60 on this one.
MercuryMorrison1 1 year ago
Ford Flex is a beast. Love this ride so much!!
theemceemurdah 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
xvrhernandez349 1 year ago
Wow, never thought that car would sound so good, Ford makes their V6 sound like a V8.
mmvrockerz 1 year ago
kind of hard to tell the 60mph mark from the angle, I feel like I'm hitting 60 at 50mph because of the offset. I get around 8 seconds. That about correct for these Flexs?
Lindsey7638 1 year ago 3
@Lindsey7638 Yes, around 8 seconds is normal.
Res0lut1on 1 year ago
0-60: 7.8 sec
junktoyota 1 year ago
I love that cluster!!
theemceemurdah 1 year ago
I wonder what the EcoBoost is like.
banstaman 2 years ago 8
@banstaman Its AWSOME!!!
NOTy0urPUPPET 6 months ago
wow, how does it manage to sound like a v8
GTGTRR 2 years ago 4
it doesnt.
glamisfanatic 1 year ago
it sounds nothing like a v8
ryu1036 1 year ago
These are moovers for being so big
I worked for a ford dealer and they pull like a raped ape
mad power
I want a 3.5L to replace my 3.0Lduratec and i wont need a turbo for my milan but ecoboost is badass
smokeymasterjedi 2 years ago 3
ya my 07 mkz fwd gets to 60 in about 6.2 sec if it can find traction as soon as you get close to 300hp fwd is pointless because it cant find traction
cerwinvegafan 1 year ago
yaya. the tak is a little slow...
Angarsk1991 2 years ago
@Angarsk1991 yea thats what i thought to,but it looks cool tho
screaming355 2 years ago
ive got one handles better then you think sounds way better then on the computer and spins the tires really easy lol great car i love the sony speakers and looks and how you become a part of a flex community and you wave when you see another funner then it sounds
yellowcow13 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
About 9 seconds. It's angled from the side so it looks like it hits 60 sooner than it really does. Just google the time it's officially 8.8 seconds or so.
like73ninjas 2 years ago
i got about 7-8 seconds 0-60 man this car is quick
atgskater14 2 years ago 3
I cant be bothered to time it but it looks pretty quick....wonder how it handles??
TurboVoiture2000 2 years ago
rpm odemeter is slow
maxboya 2 years ago
What do you mean??
kenneykole 2 years ago
like the sound of the engine shifting is off....the engine is at high rpm then you hear the engine low down but the rpm is still in the high area....maybe its the video camra. idk
maxboya 2 years ago
i also, think that the flex is better looking and it is bigger
tipy123 2 years ago
thats fast... looked like 5.8-6.2ish
Limbsy 2 years ago
not bad, faster than the transverse
tipy123 2 years ago
also in 2010, Flex will have a EcoBoost engine will be lot faster than transverse.
kenneykole 2 years ago
Nice tiny speedometer!
inserto1000 2 years ago
Hey Dan, looking forward to reviewing the ecoboost Flex?
rudolphna54 2 years ago
the tach gauge is off when it shifts
fballev55 2 years ago
The tach isn't off. The Audio/video sync is off. If you watch some of his others they are like that too. I guess the camera somehow messes up the sync.
rudolphna54 2 years ago
oh i did not no that
fballev55 2 years ago
Strange watching this one after all the GM ones with 7krpm shift points.
rudolphna54 2 years ago
I just bought a 2010 flex today, and i love it so far.
InUrGirlPockets 2 years ago 17
i got a 2010 flex 5 weeks agao i like it just a few small problems (the d pillar was scratched when i got it and the crome trim under the windo doesnt fight perfictly) but i still love and looking at it what model do you have and how do you like it i have a fwd sel with out ecoboost
yellowcow13 2 years ago
Is your have EcoBoost??
kenneykole 2 years ago
In this video, Does this car have EcoBoost?? or Standard V6?
kenneykole 2 years ago
Standard V6.
mpgomatic 2 years ago
Wow, that pretty fast for Standard V6, So with EcoBoost will be lot faster, right?
kenneykole 2 years ago
the reason the transmission shifts like that is because it is the 6f35 transmission. these cars are not meant for balls the wall performance. ford doesnt do that because they know its not the biggest market out there with the way the economy is. the transmission is meant to be ass smooth as possible of a shift. that 6f35 and the 6f50 in the explorers are meant for comfort. now obviously they make the mustang and gt and any other performance vehicle, but those are meant for that not a damn flex
FordMANIAC1234 2 years ago
It has the ecoboost now for the 2010 flex.
gunzkevin 2 years ago
Not the fastest but Definitely not the slowest.
oogercrackle 2 years ago
i have one it rules if you need 7 seets the flex is the best out there
yellowcow13 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the transmission sucks
JcmMagNoo 2 years ago
why?
ghost1103 2 years ago
its not consistant with the engine they need to refine their tranny.
JcmMagNoo 2 years ago
rpm needle is a bit off from the rpm noise coz the noise goes down but the needle still goes up
07alll 2 years ago
6 and a half sec?
Mustangmike232 2 years ago 3
its way farther than 6.5 secs.....
racingmustang01 2 years ago
7.5
Mustangmike232 2 years ago 4
IT's a weird angle, but I'll say roughly 7.5-8 seconds.
ScorpioFuror 2 years ago
looks like it hauls pretty good.
DarkCellular 2 years ago
those instruments lok classy
313foxbody420 2 years ago 2
that tach is weird...
coandcaiv 2 years ago
how so
rudolphna54 2 years ago
That tach looks pretty sloppy! it has a huge delay...
morcilla13 2 years ago
The delay isn't the tach, it's youtube. Audio and video sometimes get messed up on here.
vietnamrebel 2 years ago
Oh for real? My first though was the tach. good to know!
morcilla13 2 years ago
The Audio video sync is off on some of his videos, he's gotten it mostly fixed now
rudolphna54 2 years ago
if i got that right its about 8 sec right?
thugangel662 2 years ago
faster than i expected
gtachild 2 years ago
THis actually surprised me. Nice.
stuwip839 2 years ago
I have to say, this vehicle accelerates much faster than one might expect.
grado1000 2 years ago
Wow it pretty fast for SUV.
Also I know it get good gas too.
tfronasally 2 years ago
wow thats fast for a big suv
a23444 2 years ago 4
Like to see what the Ecoboost 3.5 with the 6F55 trans will do in performance and fuel economy.
sach976 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It's Ford, there is no such thing as fuel economy for a Ford.
MoxleyMauser 2 years ago
Wow you are really a dumbass arent you? I bet your one of those people who think Toyota and honda are the only cars that get good gas milage. The fusion hybrid can manage at least 40mpg, the focus gets over 35mpg, the Mustang V6 gets 28mpg, the GT version somewhere around 22 ish... you saying these are bad numbers? Even the Expedition I drive gets decent mileage for such a huge, older car. (13 city/18highway) with the 4.6L V8 in our 2003 Expedition.
rudolphna54 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What is wrong with you people, you actually think 13/18 is decent? That is horrible, in Germany all of there vehicles are getting over 60 mpg. Of course Americans think they have to be Mr. and Mrs. Big time with their big vehicles. This is the whole problem with the Greed of the American people.
MoxleyMauser 2 years ago
Oh shut up. If you read what I said, I said for SUCH A BIG VEHICLE its not that bad. And I know for a fact all the Audis, BMWs, Opels etc are NOT getting over 60mpg so stop lying and pulling that shit outta your ass. And alot of americans didnt/dont buy SUVs because they wanted to be "big time" they have big families, and travel, and need the room. not to mention its nice having that room when you need it. How is it being greedy exactly? I can say that BMW owners are greedy. expensive cars
rudolphna54 2 years ago 30
Comment removed
4MATICbenz 2 years ago
I don't have anything against BMWs, I said that as an example, ( ie- disclaimer, that was a sarcastic comment). I never said BMWs are bad, just not getting 60MPG across the entire lineup. But the point remains, people dont NEED to spend upwards of $50k for a nice car. The 2010 Ford Fusion is an excellent car, and well equipped, is in the mid 20s! Stop being anti-american, your arguments don't hold water.
rudolphna54 2 years ago
@rudolphna54 Don't generalize people. Not all BMW owners are greedy. I have one, I love it, but i'm not greedy. I'm just good at saving my money and not blowing it like the average person does.
pbcmbeez22 10 months ago
What's the problem with people buying large vehicles to haul people/stuff even if it's only occasionally? That's called FREEDOM, why ridicule people just because they make a different choice than you? I drive a supercharged 3.8 Buick that gets 30mpg on the highway, so bigger engine doesn't necessarily equate to bad mpg.
stanbernadino 2 years ago 3
woow woow woow, first of all, cars in germany are the most tiny cars ever!!! i mean i could fit one of ur cars in my pocket... secondly, 18 mpg is acually great for an suv that size with that big of an engine. My lincoln aviator is half the size and it gets about 22 mpg on highway when im doin bout 60ish, u dont know what da hell ur talkin bout bitch!!!!!!
FriedBullet99 2 years ago
Wow, really? Thats the best you could come up with? "STFU you fat american"? Wow, for one thing, I'm not fat. Second of all, I'm sorry, but that isn't a good response to any of my points. It just shows your ignorance, and you have no good comeback to my argument, so just go troll somewhere else.
rudolphna54 2 years ago
So your telling me a bmw x5 gets 60 mpg?
ptowntexas 2 years ago
No, it certainly does not. But there new diesel model 3 series get 36 mpg highway. This is much better than many of the ford models.
MoxleyMauser 2 years ago
I pulled down forty-odd MPG highway in the 335d, with a 0-60 of 6 seconds. That car is a BEAST. :)
mpgomatic 2 years ago
for a 6000 lb suv, 18 is not bad at all.
ktm975 2 years ago 2
@MoxleyMauser With Ford, it's about how you drive them. I have an old Ford Taurus Wagon, a big car but not huge, and not making very much power, yet we were averaging 11L/100km (21MPG) in normal driving (which after owning a diesel smart car seems retarded). Despite being almost 4000 pounds with what we had in it, 11 years old, and almost 300000kms, the other day I achieved 7.5L/100km (31 MPG). Our smart car, however averaged 4L/100km or 60MPG.
Kensingtonian 1 year ago
@MoxleyMauser With Ford, it's about how you drive them. I have an old Ford Taurus Wagon, a big car but not huge, and not making very much power, yet we were averaging 11L/100km (21MPG) in normal driving (which after owning a diesel smart car seems retarded). Despite being almost 4000 pounds with what we had in it, 11 years old, and almost 300000kms, the other day I achieved 7.5L/100km (31 MPG). Our smart car, however averaged 4L/100km or 60MPG.
Kensingtonian 1 year ago
@MoxleyMauser With Ford, it's about how you drive them. I have an old Ford Taurus Wagon, a big car but not huge, and not making very much power, yet we were averaging 11L/100km (21MPG) in normal driving (which after owning a diesel smart car seems retarded). Despite being almost 4000 pounds with what we had in it, 11 years old, and almost 300000kms, the other day I achieved 7.5L/100km (31 MPG). Our smart car, however averaged 4L/100km or 60MPG.
Kensingtonian 1 year ago
Man, regular cars are getting surprisingly fast the past few years.
joshnc101 3 years ago
hah you got that right.. and you see the magazines complaining... OH it feels really sluggish ONLY gets to 60mph in like 8.9 seconds. Think 20 years ago when the retarded cars of the " fuel crisis " barely made 130 horsepower. 13 seconds was considered pretty good lol :P just as an example.
powerstrokediesel365 3 years ago
A 9 second 0-60 is like... its quick, but enough to get out into traffic or merge on a interstate off an exit ramp, and good enough for passing. But not in any way a fast car. Even the Civic is getting pretty dang quick these days with a 7 point something 0-60 time. New Camaro base v6 is coming with just over 300hp, and they say its 0-60 will be under 6 seconds. I'v only driven a few cars built a couple decades ago, they were defenately underpowered.
joshnc101 3 years ago
Chevy is going with the Same engine that the Cadillac Cts has 3.6 Direct injection 306hp
pjmcoats90 2 years ago 2
theirs a 0-80mph video of one up here somwhere if you search. only its the awd version of the CTS. I expect the camaro v6 would be a bit quicker since its a little bit lighter and only being rwd.
joshnc101 2 years ago
Yeah it should.What about any V8's what V8 are they gonna put in it..
pjmcoats90 2 years ago
6.2 422hp LS3. Though if its the exact engine as used in the Corvettes, its actually rated at 430hp.
joshnc101 2 years ago
i thought they would use the 6.0V8 like in the Pontiac G8. It out runs the Charger Rt. beats its 0-60..They might use the 6.0V8 in like a Base V8 model. and use the 6.2V8 that the GXP G8 has too... I dont know they will prob use the same power setup as the G8 i BEt with the 3engines.
pjmcoats90 2 years ago
Its coming with two different 6.2 LS3's. One of them is the regular LS3, but the other one is being called the L99 coming with the 6 speed auto, it has active fuel managment while the regular LS3 doesn't. They show different HP ratings between the two, but GM tends to under-rate the power output of an engine in something other than the Vette so they could be the same 430hp LS3.
joshnc101 2 years ago
it would be good if they had the 6.0v8 for fuel eco..
pjmcoats90 2 years ago
It wouldn't make any difference in fuel consumption. If you look around on Corvette forums and such. A huge number of Vette owners with the LS1 to LS3 v8's have gotten 30+mpg pretty easy on the highway and average in the low 20's. Car engines are getting more efficient, even the big cubed v8's are but most cars are getting heavier and that takes away from the possible increase in fuel economy. Put that same LS3 vette engine in a truck or SUV and it will struggle to average anymore than 15mpg.
joshnc101 2 years ago
Yeah i know. my uncle has a new sierra with the 6.2 in it.. he gets like 16 on the hwy if hes lucky.
pjmcoats90 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
too much power. need more mpg
MoxleyMauser 2 years ago
too much unneeded power. need more mpg
MoxleyMauser 2 years ago
less power does not necessarily mean more MPG. most people would rather have some punch, especially for merging on the highway. A wimpy 1.6L 4 cylinder wouldnt cut it in a vehicle this size. It gets good gas mileage with the V6.
rudolphna54 2 years ago
hahaha! you got ford flex too! nice
vraddrag 3 years ago
show one when you go top speed
odyma43 3 years ago