Its impossible for an airhead to do anything about the internet---imagine betty soretoe and Mr hiliareous clinton committing sodomy on the christian military, and betty creating the new angle presidential perogative taking president over the constitution
so you pay 2000 for a laptop 100 for a windows disk and 30 for ya broadband and then for web sites? ha ha i dont think so if this ever came in i wood chuck me laptop in the bin lol i hope the net stays open i cant live without it
population control.census2010,communication old fashion the money bills write on them ,,phone,cellphone,, telegram ,money orders , buy from mexico and canada internet ethernet,, hack g sm, and edge, network, devices that most americans can make or have smuggling,, hackin on it send messages tv and radio, media, applications sugesting boxes, surveys,, mail am- fm
"I'm a big believer in Net Neutrality. As long as I get a kill switch so I can shut off the US from the rest of the world when, as we are heavily prepared for, American civil unrest. Egypt has the right idea, just like China."
@paulcoonan Funny you'd say that, it was actually the ISPs shut down the internet for egypt--the government bullied them into it. Who needs a killswitch? Net neutrality's necessarily.
@paulcoonan I know, my point is that a killswitch isn't even needed though. There aren't many broadband providers in this country and they're already good pals with our government anyhow. Why kill internet access when you can silently throttle the problematic sites? The president has ALREADY had this sort of power over communications infrastructure since WWII, and obama's said he'd use it in an emergency. Google this for more info: obama kill switch world war 2
Obama’s “FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn Free Internet a Civil Right for Every Nappy-Headed Child” watch?v=JWETGCggzcE She also voted for Net Neutrality,which could ultimately censor the internet impeding our first amendment rights of Freedom of Speech. watch?v=lGplqSh8fYU
.
Her dad is James Clyburn, former house majority WHIP. She’s probably aware our unfunded liabilities are $115 Trillion per debt clock.
Lies lies...1:00 What about ae9/11truth website? What about forums where intelligent people discuss the potential we have to feed the world and live in harmony if we would only end the fed and disband the military?
The FCC during Christmas when nobody was paying attention grants itself powers over the internet market disregarding court orders against it. Congress has not voted for it. The FCC is a rogue agency that uses illegal powers and dirty tricks. They believe in the ends justify the means. Net Neutrality is a Marxist ruse to destroy free enterprise competition and ultimately free speech. Net Neutrality will lead to lead to less freedom of speech and higher prices.
Julius Genachowski) was president Obama's part in the FCC 12/21/2010 decision to authorize corporate censorship and control over the internet? These are terribly frightening times for the future of humanity!
Officially confirmed bullshit. Thanks for ripping freedom from the mouths of americans and feeding control over that freedom to the very companies who stand to profit from withholding it.
You have a good point - But, I feel that you are missing a big issue.
These services that are provided are only around because of a supply and a demand. All services are successful because someone is willing to trade one service for another. You work for money so in the end your trading labor for internet service.
Great example - Healthcare legislation - It's going to cut cost, it's going to allow you to keep your current coverage, it's going to cut spending, it's going to make it 78 degrees year round and everyone can sit at home and play COD!!!!!!
But wait, it creates over 100 new government agencies created, Over 130 companies have wavers from the bill. Why??? It's the greatest thing since the spiteful chef overcooked the french-fry and presto potato chips!!!
@TheSGM3 You like playing COD and gaming online? Without NN, Comcast can off you special premium service where they increase your bandwidth for a "competitive no lag" edge...
Of course before introducing that new service, they will throttle back bandwidth, slow it down and charge you more for what you would have received if the FFC ensures NN.
Do you like the commercial wasteland that TV has become? Thats what will happen to the internet without NN.
@nnddnndd22 This is a free market. The price that something is sold is the price in which the market will take. If internet from comcast was 200 per/mo do you think the web would have expanded as fast as it has? The free market has made everything in the country accelerate at a very fast rate.
Once government gets its foot in the door of regulating it never stops. Regulations cost money which in the end get put off on the consumer.
Lets see what government does and how it blames the free market. When the fed prints money, It causes inflation. Right now the fed has print so much money that it's only releasing a small fraction at a time to slow inflation. So when the cost of of goods or services go up the government blames "greedy" corporations. When in fact these increases are a result of inflation.
Its not always the Fed. Sometimes the supply goes down or the demand goes up which can cause a price increase.
@nnddnndd22 So in the end with more regulation of services the more government. They will need to expand to monitor and enforce what ever they are regulating. More spending. They will most likely create more agencies to monitor and enforce the monitors and enforcers of the regulations as they do with the fed budget. There are over 10 agencies that monitor the federal budget. They all inter-lap each other so it is almost imposable to eliminate one without eliminating them all.
@TheSGM3 The chain of events on part of allowing Comcast, for example, free control of bandwidth is far more obvious and detrimental than the FCC ensuring that no information on the web is discriminated against in light of commercial interests.
Nixing NN wont create competition, it'll suppress it. It wont make things easier for the consumer either. Whether Google, Yahoo, Amazon,eBay etc.. load fast or slow on your computer will depend on how much those companies pay Comcast for more bandwidth.
@nnddnndd22 Government intervention screws a balance up.
Am i saying that capitalism and the free market is perfect and has a no flaws? No
It works and has contributed to the lavish lifestyle Americans have today.
Once you go down the road of making laws or regulations it may sound good but it never stops expanding. Before you know it something small evolves into a monster. It also pushes companies overseas and then we lose jobs.
TAKE ACTION! Let's stop complaining and do something. You're here because obviously you want do something and are bothered by the current affairs, right?
thenationalmovementofpatriots dot c o m Go to the TAKE ACTION section.
The internet has always been neutral, it is only recently that large corporations have proposed changes that will take away net neutrality. Unless there are laws put into place, corporations will change it.
I hope Obama lasts the next election, he is the best. people always complain he sucks. I really doubt that when you say "He does nothing" actually a president like obama thats a very powerful speaker actually REALLY helps out this country and he does MORE than you would actually think! Especially keeping the net from being filtered/censored like china. So if obama supports net neutrality then that means a very big thing, A better economy, besides ISP's have no right to filter. internet is open
Uhhh I must have missed something. So WHAT IS YOUR COMMITMENT to keeping the net neutral Mr. President? Is it anything like your oath to uphold the Constitution? That one didn't take long to break.
this is stupid. government should not be involved in communication mediums. end the FCC. even if the internet was going down to corporations, which it's not, the government has no role in kitty issues like this.
Hit Google and Verizon where it hurts them the most their pockets. If everyone dosen't use Google for 2 months January & February 2011, and all Verizon customers don't pay their bills for 2 months also January & February 2011. They will both get the message that they are Big, but we the People are BIGGER. Vive Net Neutrality !!
Boycott Google and Verizon NOW. The people of the World own the Internet not Google or Verizon. Power to the People !! Vive le revolution !! Vive Net Neutrality.
Google and Verizon are Big. We the People are Bigger.
Boycott Google and Verizon NOW. The people of the World own the Internet not Google or Verizon. Power to the People !! Vive le revolution !! Vive Net Neutrality.
if obama keeps net neutrality, i will be a big democratic supporter for the rest of my life... if it doesnt, then im just gonna burn down corporate buldings untill google goes out of buisness... its time to get violent, the government takes away so much, all i want is my internet... if we lose the internet i will lose hope for humanity... i wont riot, ill do my own agenda in the middle of the night at random corporate locations... FREE INTERNET OR NO INTERNET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@zookap what the fuck are you talking about? what kind of provokateer agent burns corporate buildings in the middle of the night... reread my comment fuckface
@wildboy789789 Every agent provocateur rants about bullshit like that while pretending to be aligned with those he is trying to defame. basically trying to say "Oh look at me I hate Obama AND I'm a domestic terrorist." I'm not sure if you provocateur or not but if not man you gotta stop.
@zookap i support obama... if i wanted to overthrow the government (which i dont) i wouldent even be at a protest, thats how you get arrested and get nothing accomplished... im not a provokateer, im not even a protester... im a social democrat, who votes 3rd party but is still trying to support left wing candidates in the mainstream... obama is obviously a capitalist but hes not as ruthless and stupid as republican capitalists, and i feel like obama is passing good laws, marajuana, gay rights
@wildboy789789 Haha you support Obama but you favor net neutrality? Classic doublethink. You think Obama is passing good laws? You enjoy having the government mandate that you buy something? We are of two different species.
@zookap obama is the big government guy protecting net neutrality... republicans are trying to give internet control to corporations so they can make more money, THATS A SIMPLE FACT... also the government isnt making you buy anything, its called the public OPTION... you can keep your helth INSURANCE, NOTHIN has happened to the acctual hospitals, just the insurance... obama is great, your beliveing all the myths put out by corporations and republicans
@wildboy789789 I have never heard someone so indoctrinated by the false "republican/democrat bullshit. Tell me something, what did you think of George W Bush? And for the record, the health care bill DOES force people to change plans, often to more expensive plans, but you go ahead and think that isn't true if ya want.
@zookap george bush was a good buisnessman... and an all around bad person to be president... obama is a great turn around... hes not the best, but hes ok, and ok is 1000x better than bush... you dont have to buy the government insurance!!! otherwise the heath insurance companies would have been bought out by the gov... its an option, and he didnt even touch the hospitals, whats with you people? dont hate everything he does because hes black
@wildboy789789 Don't pull the race card here you little brat! I don't give a shit what color he is, I just look at what he does as president. So far it has absolutely not been a "great turn around" he's been a great acceleration in the EXACT SAME DIRECTION. He took bushes deficit and TRIPLED it, spending more money than all other presidents combined. Allowed the fed to print and distribute FIVE TRILLION dollars. He has been the biggest wall street sell out in history. PAY ATTENTION.
@wildboy789789 The bailout was passed against the will of more than 70% of the US. He isn't closing Guantanamo as promised, in fact his administration is working to make preventative detention legal in the US. He has made a small token "effort" to pull a few troops from Iraq but has replaced them with private contractors who are notoriously corrupt and cost WAY MORE. He has broken basically every campaign promise he made. He refuses to acknowledge that there are massive border problems.
@wildboy789789 He even sues a state for writing a state law that says that if a suspected illegal immigrant is arrested for a crime, they are aloud to ask if he is legal and if they find an illegal immigrant they are aloud to detain him. Obama and his administration have proven so many times that they do not believe government get's their power from our consent.
@wildboy789789 And for fuck sake I can't believe you actually pulled the race card. What if I was black, would you say not to hate Obama because of his color? You probably would not which means that you objected to my opinion partly because of what color (you think) my skin is. Fuck you, racist schmuck.
@zookap im not rascist just because i assume your white because your a republican... republicans are openly anti-gay anti-latino and anti-atheist (so lets guess which way all the anti-black people vote)... your political party is full of whites... im white but im a democrat and my party is mixed, your rascist
@wildboy789789 So according to you I am a racist because SOME republicans are anti-gay or anti-latino and I don't support the democratic president? Where is the logic in that. The Republican party (of which I am not a member FYI) is not about race all, though SOME members are racist. I called YOU a racist because you began arguing against me SOLELY because of the color you thought my skin was. You gotta get your head out of the whole "left VS right" bullshit.
@zookap you say your not a republican, then you try and defend the republicans... so quit telling me that my assumptions are wrong... the MAJORITY of republicans are anti-equality, so your a rascist if you support that agenda... you might not attack minorities but you vote against their freedoms... and you havent listed 1 bad thing about obama... you told me he stopped the detainment of illegal aliens, how does that proove hes for big government if hes freeing people from prison? hes a saint
@wildboy789789 You need to stop assuming you know what everyone is thinking and what they support and start talking about reality: what you ACTUALLY witness happening. You can only call me a racist if you witness me implying that all races are not equal. It will not work to say that you think I might support an "agenda" that has a few racist followers. Strict conservatives are the least racist people in politics. Conservatives see individuals, not groups.
@wildboy789789 You really need to do some research of your own and if you want to you can actually read what I wrote before you respond to it. Obama is not freeing ANYONE from prison. Illegal immigrants are just that, illegal. Immigrants may have built this country but that does not mean I have to support amnesty for an additional 20 or so million ILLEGAL immigrants. There is literally a WAR happening on the border and in Arizona, drug cartels literally have taken over areas like the mafia.
@zookap if weed was legal then drug cartels wouldent have the money to buy guns... if guns were illegal for americans there would be no stores for the gangs to rob guns from... liberals have been trying to fix the problem globally, your type focus on the immediat problem and resort to violence "gangs are crossing the border? then shoot them at the border"... your a fucking cave man... obama went to college, maybe he deserves the power he has, bush was a cheerleader (seriously)
Oh my god man you can't be serious. Look: enough of this "your type" and "your focus" shit. You have made so many assumptions and all of the have been false. You don't seem to have any idea what you are even saying, you just type. Taking guns away from American citizens is NOT going to lessen gun violence, it will make law-abiding citizens more vulnerable to it. Gun control RAISES gun violence, statistics prove this. The right to bare arms is one of the most fundamentally American things.
@wildboy789789 Now unless, and this is the third time I am asking, unless you can give me ONE example of Obama's "complete turnaround" from Bush, I will see this conversation as over.
I don't know where you get the idea that this is about democrats fending off evil republicans. Both parties are exactly the same on everything that matters. The right and the left have been waltzing for years to music that the banks play and you are to distracted to realize that. They have you following sock puppets for fuck sake.
@zookap people in government have power that the bankers dont... the game only works if the candidates play ball with the banks... i personally could get elected and make a bunch of promises to the banks, then with enough support i could get a bill passed for a special law enforcement agency and literally kill all the bankers... its not like the bankers are getting elected lol, its real people who get hurt by the bankers everyday, they can take the 1 time bribe or fix the country
@wildboy789789 Obama has already said that he doesn't want to use federal resources to secure the border because Arizona would then have no reason to compromise on immigration reform. Hmmm, siding with a hostile foreign power over your own government? That is literally the definition of treason. Obama supports everyone BUT the American people. He has lied to our faces SO MANY TIMES and is the biggest wall street sell out in history! What do you see in him? How is he not the same as BUSH??
@wildboy789789 Oh and you said to me "you might not attack minorities but you vote against their freedoms"
Tell me know, how do you justify saying this? Have you ever once seen me vote? You need to stop acting like the anchors at fox news and start talking about REALITY. If I haven't said something, don't take your disagreements about whatever it is to ME.
@wildboy789789 Really, what can you possibly see in Obama? What good has he done for us? What excuses does he have for all the bad he has done? My guess is we disagree not because we come to different conclusions about Obama's actions but that you simply don't know anything about them.
I think the "Digital Divide" and "net neutrality" projects are part of government-controlled internet. Taxpayers already provide free cell phones for those on government assistance. You can get internet service at any public library. With only 49% of the USA paying taxes, seems to me "too many are riding in the wagon and not enough PULLING!"
This is just one more example of Odumba's attempt to silence any opposition voices. He cannot stand the idea of the free market making people's lives better. Odumba is a blatant marxist and should be impeached. There is no end to this man's destructive tendencies toward the USA. GET RID OF ODUMBA NOW! SEND HIM BACK TO KENYA!
net neutrality is CRITICAL to how the internet works. if you arent for net neutrality, you're against free speech, and want to throw your money away paying for what you should already have.
net neutrality is a bunch of bull SH*T say what you want net neutrality means the government can monitor an see whatever at all times . that is crap... i sure dont want or need them morons watching and seeing what people are doing.mind your own fu*king business. i agree he is and can do great stuf.but this makes me hate him with a passion. i and hope many others find a way around it. a glitch hack something
@slip155 You have no idea what net neutrality is. Get your eyes off fox news for more than 5 minutes to understand that net neutrality doesnt mean the government sees what you browse. It means the government is responsible for keeping corporations from blocking the sites you visit. Please learn about the issue before spouting nonsense like this... otherwise you are nothing better than a creationist
@slip155 "net neutrality means the government can monitor an see whatever at all times" Oh yeah thats practical. In what fantasy world does the government have the capability to monitor each of the billions of people who use the internet individually? Unbelievable
The internet... the greatest invention in the history of mankind. The internet symbolizes freedom from oppression, manipulation and greedy corporations who seemingly want more money everyday. Long live the freedom of sharing, creativity, and information flow! Fuck those who oppose net neutrality!
Unfortunately Canada is losing the war on Net Neutrality.... Bell Canada has already made plans to lock down and charge more money for the service it already offers and putting up restrictiongs. Youtube and other downloading websites (any streaming content can be considered downloading by videos are the big one) will be impossible to get with their normal service. Looks like we'll be switching providers pretty soon.
@myRealLifeNickname um sorry but the "rednecks" you claim dont want to pay 500$ a month for health care! So yeah you know it might be good what hes doing on "THIS HAND but not everything else, oh are you black because if you are black just cause you are doesnt mean you cant be racist, RACIST Sorry but you know hes ruining America no makeing it good and also alot of people voted for him because hes young WHY? he's had no government experience! *cough* Sarah Pailin *cough*
@DandilionLyrics I think its pretty clear from her campaign style that she isnt anywhere near being ready for being President. Besides, the fact that in a debate she cant keep herself from attacking her own strawman doesnt give me hope for her overall intelect.
Sure why shouldn't the government take control of a free entreprise that has been expanding astronomically without it?
Look what they did for Television + Radio, Medicare, the DMV, old age security, postal service, etc. Why not add the slow death of the internet to their resume?
Net Neutrality is government control of private property and government control of once free speech. You have no more right to demand the government control the property of others for your own benefit than you have to ask them to publish your opinions in the NY times.
@rbairos1 What if Verizon was an ultra liberal company and they decided "hey, we don't like that crap on FoxNews.com and The DrudgeReport. Let's shut down those sites and withhold access for a price." Would that be okay?
@rbairos1 That's the point. It's about telecom companies regulating what isn't their property. Like what cable companies are doing with channels. Charging for certain cable packages. That's what Net Neutrality ensures won't happen. If you don't want Net Neutrality, enjoy paying for youtube in the Premium Package in the next couple years.
@Steveaux You might as well tell the New York Times what they can put on their front page as its not their property, or tell Fed-Ex who they can and can't negotiate deals with, as its not their property, etc.
More importantly, If ISPs are interested in limiting customer satisfaction I wouldn't be buying 500x the bandwidth for the same price as I did a few years ago..
@rbairos1 The NYT, Fed Ex, and The Internet are such a loose correlation, it's comical. And no, it's not that they're "interested in limiting customer satisfaction," it's that they don't care. It's about economic viability. If it's more economically viable to section off content on the internet and sell them in packages they'd, well, do what they're doing now and lobby Washington heavily to attain that kind of power. It's not like you have to research hard into this.
@Steveaux Its economically unviable to section off content in such a manner as obviously there is a huge demand for current setup. What stopped all ISPs from colluding to charge the same prices as ten years back? If you think they have such unparalleled power ask yourself why? Hint: Monopolies do not exist in a free market. Whatever power a telecom giant gained was through corporate lobbied government regulation. Pushing for an even larger government role is adding fuel to the fire.
@rbairos1 That's a key point in this whole controversy: whether or not internet infrastructure is purely "property," or if it's partially a "public utility." While it's true it would be fine for, say, a cable company to block political programs they were opposed to, because they own the broadcast and infrastructure, would it be alright for the power company to deny power to all the liberal lobbyists' offices in the area? Hell no. The internet is a similar utility and needs similar neutrality.
@japlin06 "would it be alright for the power company to deny power to all the liberal lobbyists' offices in the area?"
A monopoly can only exist with coercive protection from a state in the first place, so you're question is entirely moot. Imagine for example, if the state controlled all vehicle production since its apparently too critical to be left to the marketplace. Would you then be arguing for an auto-neutrality law lest Yaris decide not to sell to women? Where does the insanity stop?
@rbairos1 "Would you then be arguing for an auto-neutrality law lest Yaris decide not to sell to women?"
This already exists in the form of various anti-discrimination laws, etc. I love the free market, but it needs (very few!) ethical limits. Limiting utility companies (ISPs included!) from being able to hand-pick their customers is one of these. In many areas of the US there is only 1 ISP available, so switching providers is simply not an option. There are already widespread monopolies.
@japlin06 "I love the free market, but it needs (very few!) ethical limits." Forcing (under threat of violence, kidnapping, ie law) one party to trade with another against his/her will is not ethical. Anti-discrimination laws are immoral.
"In many areas..only 1 ISP, so switching..not an option. There are already widespread monopolies."
Bull. When theres a need there will be providers.The only thing stopping that interaction is government regulation. Look at the history of AT+T for example.
@japlin06 "This already exists in the form of various anti-discrimination laws, etc"
Besides pointing out the immorality of anti discrimination laws, the main point is that its completely unnecessary as any company that excluded a large segment of its potential market would be vulnerable to one that didnt. Unless of course, that company was a government protected monopoly, as is the case with the telecommunication industry in the states. The solution is not piling on even more state control...
@tikalal get violent... the internet is the most powerful tool against lies... so if people in government are pushing for more lies... then i would personally get violent... or at least politically violent, walk into your congressmans office and say "why are you scared of free speech" (make sure you video tape it)... i wish you the best
@thegoof529 agreed. everything that comes out of this puppets mouth is a lie.
say theres some neutrality, does that mean everything you say and do on the internet isn't being monitored? no. it just means that some bullshit he says now is appeasing some of the people. what happened to all the idiots who were crying and weeping for the savior who had come? why have his ratings dropped. because the very same idiots have realized he not bringing the "change" he promised. such utter nonsense.
@jmck555 If you understood American politics you would understand it is IMPOSSIBLE for Bush to have stayed in. His two terms were up. And with hindsight, Obama is/was not the best idea :)
The internet is fine the way it is. This is normal double tongue rhetoric from a corrupt politician, who wants to find ways to control, regulate, and tax, a successful, non-governmental industry. Some ppl like to say Bush lied, people died. I say, Obama lies America dies!
but yes, obama is part of a much bigger plan, hes a puppet of the oligarchs. read and watch the obama deception, loose change. look into the bilderberg.
what a load of shit net neautrality = censored internet... im not sure how the fcc whose job it is to censor stuff could some how make the internet more free, and how could the internet be different or better with the FCC regulating and possibly aprroving what you put on the the internet
@themose93 The idea is that if the head of the FCC supports net neutrality the likelihood of the government pressing for internet control and censorship is less then say with one that is against net neutrality.
Wow you could cut the sexual tension with a knife. Why didn't these guys just fuck and get it over with. Obama wants to pound his meaty brown eye so hard. And that sweaty interviewer would love nothing more then to bend Obama over and press his sturdy rod deep into his body cavity.
If he campaigned on it, then it means he's against it. Americans... forget it, this is an inevitable tendency, like the Health care mandate. Net Neutrality is already lost, the bad guys always win.
This is a slight unmeritable man, meet to be sent on errands: and, though others lay these honors on this man, to ease themselves of divers slanderous loads, he shall but bear them as the ass bears gold, to groan and sweat under the business, either led or driven, as they point the way; and having brought their treasure where they will, then take they down his load and turn him off, like to the empty ass, to shake his ears and graze in commons.
@allofthenamesrtaken: So is my horse and for that I do appoint him store of provender: It is a creature that I teach to fight, to wind, to stop, to run directly on, his corporal motion govern'd by my spirit. and, in some taste, is president airhead but so; he must be taught, and train'd, and bid go forth: A barren-spirited fellow; one that feeds on objects, arts, and imitations, which, out of use and staled by other men, begin his fashion: do not talk of him But as a property.
Information is powerfull... I like Obama, I like to be able to tell people why... I like to hear people tell me why I shouldn't like him. An educated public is a powerfull public. No Net Neutrality means that you may not be able to hear what anyone says, because you just used up all your internet time!
Many of us are ashamed to be Democrats. More than that, we have come to fear our own Democratic Party. Hatred and corruption - the roots of socialism - are on the march as they have never been before, and leading this march is our Democratic Party. Increasingly, mainstream Democrats are uncomfortable with what we see in our party. All the more, we know it is dangerous.
What do you know about Democrats, you corporate shill? Hatred and corruption are hallmarks of your Republican friends. Nice try, DF, but anybody who chooses a name like that has an agenda. Your's is obvious. You are a wolf in a very shoddy sheep costume. Grow some brains before you try this sort of thing.
That right? Did you know that if you take a Republican politician and a Democratic politician whipe away the lies about what they "believe" in. Take off the party blinders and only look at the policies they pass and enforce. Once you do it becomes glaringly clear that both are identical. The only difference between them are the lies and rhetoric they tell to cover up that truth.
@russkeller: It is true that many vote the same way when Special Interest money is involved and many are happy to gain what they can for their states. The only real conflicts occur when they go against special interests like the insurance companies. But it's glaringly clear that Democrats favor common-sense social programs over predatory capitalism. "They're all the same," is just an excuse for being lazy about democracy.
@DojoNDude Really? Justfy Obama and Congress Reinacting the PATRIOT ACT! And once you fail at that because you can't do that, Justify the Media's lack of coverage of it.
We as Democrats are marching in a parade with people Harry Truman or even Jack Kennedy would not recognize - socialist (also know as progressives) who think that Western civilization began in 1969. Strangely, without meaning to, we the mainstream Democrats find ourselves representing this "socialist movement." However, for the "socialist" within our Democratic Party, there is nothing so strange about it. Socialist have always sought to leverage corruption for the sake of power.
our Democratic Party has already lost the equivalent of every member we have acquired over the past seven years or more. More importantly, a recent Newsweek cover declared, "We are all socialists now."
Greg, They would charge the businesses which would create a unfair advantage and you would have a monopolised internet. It is part of the issue on an economic level.
i'm in, I can't let my webcomic on Deviantart go to waste! i'm saving the internet!
kirbykrisis18 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This bastard is looking at internet ID, he is in support of SOPA, but yet he wants people to believe that he is for internet neutrality?
MY ASS. Mr. Obama, you are a CHRONIC liar.
1337wafflezz 3 weeks ago
Obama wants Net Neutrality so that he can "neutralize" the net!! It is a threat to his position!!
Has government regulation ever helped?? LMAO!!!
LameBrainMcCain 1 month ago in playlist net neutrality
stop sopa!
tommyduncan12 1 month ago
wow
MrMills92x 2 months ago
I admit my approval of Obama has not been the highest lately.
But if I was old enough to vote, mine would be for him.
AliceHasaWonderland 2 months ago
Comment removed
ChopShop1200 2 months ago
YES! FOR ONCE, I AM LOVING OBAMA!
VETO THIS BILL, MR. PRESIDENT!
donkeybuttpin123 2 months ago
we must protect the internet. extremely important.
doonymacc 6 months ago
Who is John Galt?
se7en0fclub5 9 months ago
Its impossible for an airhead to do anything about the internet---imagine betty soretoe and Mr hiliareous clinton committing sodomy on the christian military, and betty creating the new angle presidential perogative taking president over the constitution
lassiecox 9 months ago
so you pay 2000 for a laptop 100 for a windows disk and 30 for ya broadband and then for web sites? ha ha i dont think so if this ever came in i wood chuck me laptop in the bin lol i hope the net stays open i cant live without it
SuperBlue121 9 months ago
he already sold out our net future
therianet 10 months ago
population control.census2010,communication old fashion the money bills write on them ,,phone,cellphone,, telegram ,money orders , buy from mexico and canada internet ethernet,, hack g sm, and edge, network, devices that most americans can make or have smuggling,, hackin on it send messages tv and radio, media, applications sugesting boxes, surveys,, mail am- fm
abeladamz 11 months ago
He lies!
SenshiofWolves 1 year ago
"I'm a big believer in Net Neutrality. As long as I get a kill switch so I can shut off the US from the rest of the world when, as we are heavily prepared for, American civil unrest. Egypt has the right idea, just like China."
paulcoonan 1 year ago
@paulcoonan Funny you'd say that, it was actually the ISPs shut down the internet for egypt--the government bullied them into it. Who needs a killswitch? Net neutrality's necessarily.
rujiel17 11 months ago
@rujiel17 Kill switch means it is done. It means no negotiations with ISP to make it happen.
paulcoonan 11 months ago
@paulcoonan I know, my point is that a killswitch isn't even needed though. There aren't many broadband providers in this country and they're already good pals with our government anyhow. Why kill internet access when you can silently throttle the problematic sites? The president has ALREADY had this sort of power over communications infrastructure since WWII, and obama's said he'd use it in an emergency. Google this for more info: obama kill switch world war 2
rujiel17 11 months ago
hmm i wonder whats next..... Obama: Im a big believer in fondling your wife at the airports."
NaturalGroundation 1 year ago
Obama’s “FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn Free Internet a Civil Right for Every Nappy-Headed Child” watch?v=JWETGCggzcE She also voted for Net Neutrality,which could ultimately censor the internet impeding our first amendment rights of Freedom of Speech. watch?v=lGplqSh8fYU
.
Her dad is James Clyburn, former house majority WHIP. She’s probably aware our unfunded liabilities are $115 Trillion per debt clock.
Oktoberfesting 1 year ago
Lies lies...1:00 What about ae9/11truth website? What about forums where intelligent people discuss the potential we have to feed the world and live in harmony if we would only end the fed and disband the military?
bdh826 1 year ago
that's it, i'm moving to Australia
madnessdexter 1 year ago
Oh the irony here.
VanguardGames 1 year ago
The FCC during Christmas when nobody was paying attention grants itself powers over the internet market disregarding court orders against it. Congress has not voted for it. The FCC is a rogue agency that uses illegal powers and dirty tricks. They believe in the ends justify the means. Net Neutrality is a Marxist ruse to destroy free enterprise competition and ultimately free speech. Net Neutrality will lead to lead to less freedom of speech and higher prices.
conanthebarbarian333 1 year ago
OHHH so we should put the government in charge of keeping the internet open.
Because government regulation always fixes everything...AHH!
halohadel 1 year ago
What (if any beyond appointing FCC Chairman
Julius Genachowski) was president Obama's part in the FCC 12/21/2010 decision to authorize corporate censorship and control over the internet? These are terribly frightening times for the future of humanity!
tubeneophyte 1 year ago
LYING SCUMBAG
oximoronTV 1 year ago 2
Officially confirmed bullshit. Thanks for ripping freedom from the mouths of americans and feeding control over that freedom to the very companies who stand to profit from withholding it.
kidyousaid 1 year ago 2
@kidyousaid ... Would you explain your comment, please? Thank you.
emantabrizi 2 months ago
President Obama made four mistakes subsequent to his election.
1. NOT utilizing Mark Lloyd of the FCC to eliminate propagandistic conservative talk radio (the plan was already in place) when he had the chance.
2. NOT enforcing net neutrality when he had the chance.
3. Underestimating the large numbers of hateful, imbecilic, bigoted republitards who would "vote angry" in Nov 2010.
4. Underestimating the shocking number of complacent Democrats who would NOT vote in Nov 2010.
bedpanX 1 year ago
You have a good point - But, I feel that you are missing a big issue.
These services that are provided are only around because of a supply and a demand. All services are successful because someone is willing to trade one service for another. You work for money so in the end your trading labor for internet service.
TheSGM3 1 year ago
Come On Barry! Give it a rest.
It start with internet regulation it opens the door to new regulations on top.
A few years down the road they do more.
If you all can't see this chain of events your oblivious ignorant.
TheSGM3 1 year ago
@TheSGM3
Great example - Healthcare legislation - It's going to cut cost, it's going to allow you to keep your current coverage, it's going to cut spending, it's going to make it 78 degrees year round and everyone can sit at home and play COD!!!!!!
But wait, it creates over 100 new government agencies created, Over 130 companies have wavers from the bill. Why??? It's the greatest thing since the spiteful chef overcooked the french-fry and presto potato chips!!!
TheSGM3 1 year ago
@TheSGM3 You like playing COD and gaming online? Without NN, Comcast can off you special premium service where they increase your bandwidth for a "competitive no lag" edge...
Of course before introducing that new service, they will throttle back bandwidth, slow it down and charge you more for what you would have received if the FFC ensures NN.
Do you like the commercial wasteland that TV has become? Thats what will happen to the internet without NN.
nnddnndd22 1 year ago
@nnddnndd22 This is a free market. The price that something is sold is the price in which the market will take. If internet from comcast was 200 per/mo do you think the web would have expanded as fast as it has? The free market has made everything in the country accelerate at a very fast rate.
Once government gets its foot in the door of regulating it never stops. Regulations cost money which in the end get put off on the consumer.
TheSGM3 1 year ago
@nnddnndd22
Lets see what government does and how it blames the free market. When the fed prints money, It causes inflation. Right now the fed has print so much money that it's only releasing a small fraction at a time to slow inflation. So when the cost of of goods or services go up the government blames "greedy" corporations. When in fact these increases are a result of inflation.
Its not always the Fed. Sometimes the supply goes down or the demand goes up which can cause a price increase.
TheSGM3 1 year ago
@nnddnndd22 So in the end with more regulation of services the more government. They will need to expand to monitor and enforce what ever they are regulating. More spending. They will most likely create more agencies to monitor and enforce the monitors and enforcers of the regulations as they do with the fed budget. There are over 10 agencies that monitor the federal budget. They all inter-lap each other so it is almost imposable to eliminate one without eliminating them all.
It never stops.
TheSGM3 1 year ago
@TheSGM3 The chain of events on part of allowing Comcast, for example, free control of bandwidth is far more obvious and detrimental than the FCC ensuring that no information on the web is discriminated against in light of commercial interests.
Nixing NN wont create competition, it'll suppress it. It wont make things easier for the consumer either. Whether Google, Yahoo, Amazon,eBay etc.. load fast or slow on your computer will depend on how much those companies pay Comcast for more bandwidth.
nnddnndd22 1 year ago
@nnddnndd22 Government intervention screws a balance up.
Am i saying that capitalism and the free market is perfect and has a no flaws? No
It works and has contributed to the lavish lifestyle Americans have today.
Once you go down the road of making laws or regulations it may sound good but it never stops expanding. Before you know it something small evolves into a monster. It also pushes companies overseas and then we lose jobs.
Then the Fed blames the free market
TheSGM3 1 year ago
18 republicans prefer to vote down democracy before voting up a good idea from a democrat.
Hopefulfilment 1 year ago
TAKE ACTION! Let's stop complaining and do something. You're here because obviously you want do something and are bothered by the current affairs, right?
thenationalmovementofpatriots dot c o m Go to the TAKE ACTION section.
THUMB US UP, LET'S GET OUR COUNTRY BACK!!!
emerson24 1 year ago
Net Neutrality = Democrat Internet Censorship
arfywarfy 1 year ago
The internet has always been neutral, it is only recently that large corporations have proposed changes that will take away net neutrality. Unless there are laws put into place, corporations will change it.
jamesearlywine 1 year ago
Comment removed
luckycharmz336 1 year ago
Comment removed
luckycharmz336 1 year ago
thats my president!!
jad3948 1 year ago
I hope Obama lasts the next election, he is the best. people always complain he sucks. I really doubt that when you say "He does nothing" actually a president like obama thats a very powerful speaker actually REALLY helps out this country and he does MORE than you would actually think! Especially keeping the net from being filtered/censored like china. So if obama supports net neutrality then that means a very big thing, A better economy, besides ISP's have no right to filter. internet is open
rysliv 1 year ago
Uhhh I must have missed something. So WHAT IS YOUR COMMITMENT to keeping the net neutral Mr. President? Is it anything like your oath to uphold the Constitution? That one didn't take long to break.
zookap 1 year ago
hey i rely a lot on the net.......
mr3ggroll 1 year ago
this is stupid. government should not be involved in communication mediums. end the FCC. even if the internet was going down to corporations, which it's not, the government has no role in kitty issues like this.
daveoftheweek 1 year ago
Obama don't let the ACTA pass then otherwise you'll be a hypocritical cuntbag.
Slayer34214 1 year ago 2
give him another 4 years, make it his promise, and obama can stop this until it gets too bad!
joewhittles 1 year ago
@Ske0the0realest
you do know hes lying right ?, hes trying to shut it down.
narutocaprirequest2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hit Google and Verizon where it hurts them the most their pockets. If everyone dosen't use Google for 2 months January & February 2011, and all Verizon customers don't pay their bills for 2 months also January & February 2011. They will both get the message that they are Big, but we the People are BIGGER. Vive Net Neutrality !!
RememberToday4ever 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Boycott Google and Verizon NOW. The people of the World own the Internet not Google or Verizon. Power to the People !! Vive le revolution !! Vive Net Neutrality.
Google and Verizon are Big. We the People are Bigger.
RememberToday4ever 1 year ago
Hasn't obama openly spoken out AGAINST Net Neutrality, cramming it in with all that "Anti-Piracy" bullshit he's been spewing since 2009?
NoirRaven 1 year ago
Where the fuck are u Obamanites now? He's not going to do shit about this merger
bigbadosker 1 year ago
That was a very powerful statement from the President, I just hope his actions follow suit in the coming months and years.
soundwave348 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sign the petition here: savetheinternet(dot)com(slash)fcc-comments
Vote this comment up so that more people can see it.
If you like your internet as it is, please act!
jHotmetala 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Boycott Google and Verizon NOW. The people of the World own the Internet not Google or Verizon. Power to the People !! Vive le revolution !! Vive Net Neutrality.
Google are Big. We the People are Bigger.
RememberToday4ever 1 year ago
if obama keeps net neutrality, i will be a big democratic supporter for the rest of my life... if it doesnt, then im just gonna burn down corporate buldings untill google goes out of buisness... its time to get violent, the government takes away so much, all i want is my internet... if we lose the internet i will lose hope for humanity... i wont riot, ill do my own agenda in the middle of the night at random corporate locations... FREE INTERNET OR NO INTERNET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
wildboy789789 1 year ago 32
@wildboy789789 Dude, shut the fuck up. I smell an agent provocateur. Fuck you man.
zookap 1 year ago
@zookap what the fuck are you talking about? what kind of provokateer agent burns corporate buildings in the middle of the night... reread my comment fuckface
wildboy789789 1 year ago
@wildboy789789 Every agent provocateur rants about bullshit like that while pretending to be aligned with those he is trying to defame. basically trying to say "Oh look at me I hate Obama AND I'm a domestic terrorist." I'm not sure if you provocateur or not but if not man you gotta stop.
zookap 1 year ago
@zookap i support obama... if i wanted to overthrow the government (which i dont) i wouldent even be at a protest, thats how you get arrested and get nothing accomplished... im not a provokateer, im not even a protester... im a social democrat, who votes 3rd party but is still trying to support left wing candidates in the mainstream... obama is obviously a capitalist but hes not as ruthless and stupid as republican capitalists, and i feel like obama is passing good laws, marajuana, gay rights
wildboy789789 1 year ago
@wildboy789789 Haha you support Obama but you favor net neutrality? Classic doublethink. You think Obama is passing good laws? You enjoy having the government mandate that you buy something? We are of two different species.
zookap 1 year ago
@zookap obama is the big government guy protecting net neutrality... republicans are trying to give internet control to corporations so they can make more money, THATS A SIMPLE FACT... also the government isnt making you buy anything, its called the public OPTION... you can keep your helth INSURANCE, NOTHIN has happened to the acctual hospitals, just the insurance... obama is great, your beliveing all the myths put out by corporations and republicans
wildboy789789 1 year ago
@wildboy789789 I have never heard someone so indoctrinated by the false "republican/democrat bullshit. Tell me something, what did you think of George W Bush? And for the record, the health care bill DOES force people to change plans, often to more expensive plans, but you go ahead and think that isn't true if ya want.
zookap 1 year ago
@zookap george bush was a good buisnessman... and an all around bad person to be president... obama is a great turn around... hes not the best, but hes ok, and ok is 1000x better than bush... you dont have to buy the government insurance!!! otherwise the heath insurance companies would have been bought out by the gov... its an option, and he didnt even touch the hospitals, whats with you people? dont hate everything he does because hes black
wildboy789789 1 year ago
@wildboy789789 Don't pull the race card here you little brat! I don't give a shit what color he is, I just look at what he does as president. So far it has absolutely not been a "great turn around" he's been a great acceleration in the EXACT SAME DIRECTION. He took bushes deficit and TRIPLED it, spending more money than all other presidents combined. Allowed the fed to print and distribute FIVE TRILLION dollars. He has been the biggest wall street sell out in history. PAY ATTENTION.
zookap 1 year ago
@wildboy789789 The bailout was passed against the will of more than 70% of the US. He isn't closing Guantanamo as promised, in fact his administration is working to make preventative detention legal in the US. He has made a small token "effort" to pull a few troops from Iraq but has replaced them with private contractors who are notoriously corrupt and cost WAY MORE. He has broken basically every campaign promise he made. He refuses to acknowledge that there are massive border problems.
zookap 1 year ago
@wildboy789789 He even sues a state for writing a state law that says that if a suspected illegal immigrant is arrested for a crime, they are aloud to ask if he is legal and if they find an illegal immigrant they are aloud to detain him. Obama and his administration have proven so many times that they do not believe government get's their power from our consent.
zookap 1 year ago
@wildboy789789 And for fuck sake I can't believe you actually pulled the race card. What if I was black, would you say not to hate Obama because of his color? You probably would not which means that you objected to my opinion partly because of what color (you think) my skin is. Fuck you, racist schmuck.
zookap 1 year ago
@zookap im not rascist just because i assume your white because your a republican... republicans are openly anti-gay anti-latino and anti-atheist (so lets guess which way all the anti-black people vote)... your political party is full of whites... im white but im a democrat and my party is mixed, your rascist
wildboy789789 1 year ago
@wildboy789789 So according to you I am a racist because SOME republicans are anti-gay or anti-latino and I don't support the democratic president? Where is the logic in that. The Republican party (of which I am not a member FYI) is not about race all, though SOME members are racist. I called YOU a racist because you began arguing against me SOLELY because of the color you thought my skin was. You gotta get your head out of the whole "left VS right" bullshit.
zookap 1 year ago
@zookap you say your not a republican, then you try and defend the republicans... so quit telling me that my assumptions are wrong... the MAJORITY of republicans are anti-equality, so your a rascist if you support that agenda... you might not attack minorities but you vote against their freedoms... and you havent listed 1 bad thing about obama... you told me he stopped the detainment of illegal aliens, how does that proove hes for big government if hes freeing people from prison? hes a saint
wildboy789789 1 year ago
@wildboy789789 You need to stop assuming you know what everyone is thinking and what they support and start talking about reality: what you ACTUALLY witness happening. You can only call me a racist if you witness me implying that all races are not equal. It will not work to say that you think I might support an "agenda" that has a few racist followers. Strict conservatives are the least racist people in politics. Conservatives see individuals, not groups.
zookap 1 year ago
@wildboy789789 You really need to do some research of your own and if you want to you can actually read what I wrote before you respond to it. Obama is not freeing ANYONE from prison. Illegal immigrants are just that, illegal. Immigrants may have built this country but that does not mean I have to support amnesty for an additional 20 or so million ILLEGAL immigrants. There is literally a WAR happening on the border and in Arizona, drug cartels literally have taken over areas like the mafia.
zookap 1 year ago
@zookap if weed was legal then drug cartels wouldent have the money to buy guns... if guns were illegal for americans there would be no stores for the gangs to rob guns from... liberals have been trying to fix the problem globally, your type focus on the immediat problem and resort to violence "gangs are crossing the border? then shoot them at the border"... your a fucking cave man... obama went to college, maybe he deserves the power he has, bush was a cheerleader (seriously)
wildboy789789 1 year ago
Oh my god man you can't be serious. Look: enough of this "your type" and "your focus" shit. You have made so many assumptions and all of the have been false. You don't seem to have any idea what you are even saying, you just type. Taking guns away from American citizens is NOT going to lessen gun violence, it will make law-abiding citizens more vulnerable to it. Gun control RAISES gun violence, statistics prove this. The right to bare arms is one of the most fundamentally American things.
zookap 1 year ago
@wildboy789789 Now unless, and this is the third time I am asking, unless you can give me ONE example of Obama's "complete turnaround" from Bush, I will see this conversation as over.
zookap 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wildboy789789 Oh and here's your so called "net neutrality"
infowars.com/new-cybersecurity-bill-gives-obama-power-to-shut-down-companies/
zookap 1 year ago
@wildboy789789 And here it is again:
rawstory.com/rs/2010/09/committing-net-neutrality-rep-waxman-pushes-bill-kill/
I don't know where you get the idea that this is about democrats fending off evil republicans. Both parties are exactly the same on everything that matters. The right and the left have been waltzing for years to music that the banks play and you are to distracted to realize that. They have you following sock puppets for fuck sake.
zookap 1 year ago
@zookap people in government have power that the bankers dont... the game only works if the candidates play ball with the banks... i personally could get elected and make a bunch of promises to the banks, then with enough support i could get a bill passed for a special law enforcement agency and literally kill all the bankers... its not like the bankers are getting elected lol, its real people who get hurt by the bankers everyday, they can take the 1 time bribe or fix the country
wildboy789789 1 year ago
@wildboy789789 Man you don't get it.
zookap 1 year ago
@wildboy789789 Also, if you don't like the fact that weed is illegal, it may be time to read a bit about our vice president.
zookap 1 year ago
@wildboy789789 Obama has already said that he doesn't want to use federal resources to secure the border because Arizona would then have no reason to compromise on immigration reform. Hmmm, siding with a hostile foreign power over your own government? That is literally the definition of treason. Obama supports everyone BUT the American people. He has lied to our faces SO MANY TIMES and is the biggest wall street sell out in history! What do you see in him? How is he not the same as BUSH??
zookap 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wildboy789789 Oh and you said to me "you might not attack minorities but you vote against their freedoms"
Tell me know, how do you justify saying this? Have you ever once seen me vote? You need to stop acting like the anchors at fox news and start talking about REALITY. If I haven't said something, don't take your disagreements about whatever it is to ME.
zookap 1 year ago
@wildboy789789 Really, what can you possibly see in Obama? What good has he done for us? What excuses does he have for all the bad he has done? My guess is we disagree not because we come to different conclusions about Obama's actions but that you simply don't know anything about them.
zookap 1 year ago
@wildboy789789 Time to riot then mate! haha...
mmaghfai 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I think the "Digital Divide" and "net neutrality" projects are part of government-controlled internet. Taxpayers already provide free cell phones for those on government assistance. You can get internet service at any public library. With only 49% of the USA paying taxes, seems to me "too many are riding in the wagon and not enough PULLING!"
vechorik 5 months ago in playlist net neutrality
good upload
NEWSANDPOLITRICKS 1 year ago
Obama:the strongest one
HDREGGAE 1 year ago
respect keep it open blessings evry day for Obama:the strongest one
reggaedirect 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
U Right Its A Start For Some
People..
ghettoriddims 1 year ago
Nice upload
Raspect
RasOrville 1 year ago
ALADDIN GEE--love the video you have a great channel thums up i rate this one ALADDIN GEE was here to rate and comment Obama mi say
aladdingee 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@aladdingee Respect Brother Keep It Open
U Right Its A Start For Some
People..
hashbury09 1 year ago
Respect Brother Keep It Open
U Right Its A Start For Some
People..
ghettoriddim 1 year ago
Lies from Black Bush !..
freedombiteback 1 year ago
awesomw *****
tonydmen1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tonydmen1 Respect Brother Keep It Open
U Right Its A Start For Some
People..
hashbury09 1 year ago
This is just one more example of Odumba's attempt to silence any opposition voices. He cannot stand the idea of the free market making people's lives better. Odumba is a blatant marxist and should be impeached. There is no end to this man's destructive tendencies toward the USA. GET RID OF ODUMBA NOW! SEND HIM BACK TO KENYA!
CaptainFreedom1776 1 year ago
net neutrality is CRITICAL to how the internet works. if you arent for net neutrality, you're against free speech, and want to throw your money away paying for what you should already have.
J8Dust8 1 year ago
net neutrality is a bunch of bull SH*T say what you want net neutrality means the government can monitor an see whatever at all times . that is crap... i sure dont want or need them morons watching and seeing what people are doing.mind your own fu*king business. i agree he is and can do great stuf.but this makes me hate him with a passion. i and hope many others find a way around it. a glitch hack something
slip155 1 year ago
@slip155 You have no idea what net neutrality is. Get your eyes off fox news for more than 5 minutes to understand that net neutrality doesnt mean the government sees what you browse. It means the government is responsible for keeping corporations from blocking the sites you visit. Please learn about the issue before spouting nonsense like this... otherwise you are nothing better than a creationist
poisonedblades 1 year ago 2
@slip155 "net neutrality means the government can monitor an see whatever at all times" Oh yeah thats practical. In what fantasy world does the government have the capability to monitor each of the billions of people who use the internet individually? Unbelievable
Castropher 1 year ago
The internet... the greatest invention in the history of mankind. The internet symbolizes freedom from oppression, manipulation and greedy corporations who seemingly want more money everyday. Long live the freedom of sharing, creativity, and information flow! Fuck those who oppose net neutrality!
Alphadestrious 1 year ago
Comment removed
Alphadestrious 1 year ago
Unfortunately Canada is losing the war on Net Neutrality.... Bell Canada has already made plans to lock down and charge more money for the service it already offers and putting up restrictiongs. Youtube and other downloading websites (any streaming content can be considered downloading by videos are the big one) will be impossible to get with their normal service. Looks like we'll be switching providers pretty soon.
bubblywums 1 year ago
@myRealLifeNickname um sorry but the "rednecks" you claim dont want to pay 500$ a month for health care! So yeah you know it might be good what hes doing on "THIS HAND but not everything else, oh are you black because if you are black just cause you are doesnt mean you cant be racist, RACIST Sorry but you know hes ruining America no makeing it good and also alot of people voted for him because hes young WHY? he's had no government experience! *cough* Sarah Pailin *cough*
DandilionLyrics 1 year ago
@DandilionLyrics well said
99pennyrock 1 year ago
@DandilionLyrics I think its pretty clear from her campaign style that she isnt anywhere near being ready for being President. Besides, the fact that in a debate she cant keep herself from attacking her own strawman doesnt give me hope for her overall intelect.
guitaristxcore 1 year ago
Sure why shouldn't the government take control of a free entreprise that has been expanding astronomically without it?
Look what they did for Television + Radio, Medicare, the DMV, old age security, postal service, etc. Why not add the slow death of the internet to their resume?
rbairos1 1 year ago
Net Neutrality is government control of private property and government control of once free speech. You have no more right to demand the government control the property of others for your own benefit than you have to ask them to publish your opinions in the NY times.
rbairos1 1 year ago
@rbairos1 What if Verizon was an ultra liberal company and they decided "hey, we don't like that crap on FoxNews.com and The DrudgeReport. Let's shut down those sites and withhold access for a price." Would that be okay?
Steveaux 1 year ago 2
@Steveaux Obivously if its their property then its their decision. How much I personally like or dislike the specific content is of no relevance.
rbairos1 1 year ago
@rbairos1 That's the point. It's about telecom companies regulating what isn't their property. Like what cable companies are doing with channels. Charging for certain cable packages. That's what Net Neutrality ensures won't happen. If you don't want Net Neutrality, enjoy paying for youtube in the Premium Package in the next couple years.
Steveaux 1 year ago 2
@Steveaux You might as well tell the New York Times what they can put on their front page as its not their property, or tell Fed-Ex who they can and can't negotiate deals with, as its not their property, etc.
More importantly, If ISPs are interested in limiting customer satisfaction I wouldn't be buying 500x the bandwidth for the same price as I did a few years ago..
rbairos1 1 year ago
@rbairos1 The NYT, Fed Ex, and The Internet are such a loose correlation, it's comical. And no, it's not that they're "interested in limiting customer satisfaction," it's that they don't care. It's about economic viability. If it's more economically viable to section off content on the internet and sell them in packages they'd, well, do what they're doing now and lobby Washington heavily to attain that kind of power. It's not like you have to research hard into this.
Steveaux 1 year ago 2
@Steveaux Its economically unviable to section off content in such a manner as obviously there is a huge demand for current setup. What stopped all ISPs from colluding to charge the same prices as ten years back? If you think they have such unparalleled power ask yourself why? Hint: Monopolies do not exist in a free market. Whatever power a telecom giant gained was through corporate lobbied government regulation. Pushing for an even larger government role is adding fuel to the fire.
rbairos1 1 year ago 2
@rbairos1 That's a key point in this whole controversy: whether or not internet infrastructure is purely "property," or if it's partially a "public utility." While it's true it would be fine for, say, a cable company to block political programs they were opposed to, because they own the broadcast and infrastructure, would it be alright for the power company to deny power to all the liberal lobbyists' offices in the area? Hell no. The internet is a similar utility and needs similar neutrality.
japlin06 1 year ago 11
@japlin06 "would it be alright for the power company to deny power to all the liberal lobbyists' offices in the area?"
A monopoly can only exist with coercive protection from a state in the first place, so you're question is entirely moot. Imagine for example, if the state controlled all vehicle production since its apparently too critical to be left to the marketplace. Would you then be arguing for an auto-neutrality law lest Yaris decide not to sell to women? Where does the insanity stop?
rbairos1 1 year ago
@rbairos1 "Would you then be arguing for an auto-neutrality law lest Yaris decide not to sell to women?"
This already exists in the form of various anti-discrimination laws, etc. I love the free market, but it needs (very few!) ethical limits. Limiting utility companies (ISPs included!) from being able to hand-pick their customers is one of these. In many areas of the US there is only 1 ISP available, so switching providers is simply not an option. There are already widespread monopolies.
japlin06 1 year ago
@japlin06 "I love the free market, but it needs (very few!) ethical limits." Forcing (under threat of violence, kidnapping, ie law) one party to trade with another against his/her will is not ethical. Anti-discrimination laws are immoral.
"In many areas..only 1 ISP, so switching..not an option. There are already widespread monopolies."
Bull. When theres a need there will be providers.The only thing stopping that interaction is government regulation. Look at the history of AT+T for example.
rbairos1 1 year ago
@japlin06 "This already exists in the form of various anti-discrimination laws, etc"
Besides pointing out the immorality of anti discrimination laws, the main point is that its completely unnecessary as any company that excluded a large segment of its potential market would be vulnerable to one that didnt. Unless of course, that company was a government protected monopoly, as is the case with the telecommunication industry in the states. The solution is not piling on even more state control...
rbairos1 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I hate Obama. I wish he wouldn't of gotten elected President.
turtlelover1996 1 year ago
You guys are lucky. Down here in backward Australia our stupid government is fighting to close the internet down and censor it for all.
tikalal 1 year ago 3
@tikalal get violent... the internet is the most powerful tool against lies... so if people in government are pushing for more lies... then i would personally get violent... or at least politically violent, walk into your congressmans office and say "why are you scared of free speech" (make sure you video tape it)... i wish you the best
wildboy789789 1 year ago
Yeaaah Bobama!
mseriiiica 1 year ago
obama will be the downfall of this country.
rokkmae 1 year ago
obama will be the downfall of this country.
rokkmae 1 year ago
Obama is a great speaker.
kashkie 1 year ago
haha yeah just wait in a month or two everything else hes said is a lie, how can you believe this one
thegoof529 1 year ago
@thegoof529 agreed. everything that comes out of this puppets mouth is a lie.
say theres some neutrality, does that mean everything you say and do on the internet isn't being monitored? no. it just means that some bullshit he says now is appeasing some of the people. what happened to all the idiots who were crying and weeping for the savior who had come? why have his ratings dropped. because the very same idiots have realized he not bringing the "change" he promised. such utter nonsense.
leesard17 1 year ago
he said uh 14 times.
paige3406 1 year ago
you americans made a good choice
If bush was still in well everyone would be paying for the net
Obama =D
jmck555 1 year ago
@jmck555 If you understood American politics you would understand it is IMPOSSIBLE for Bush to have stayed in. His two terms were up. And with hindsight, Obama is/was not the best idea :)
weddbrook 1 year ago
The internet is fine the way it is. This is normal double tongue rhetoric from a corrupt politician, who wants to find ways to control, regulate, and tax, a successful, non-governmental industry. Some ppl like to say Bush lied, people died. I say, Obama lies America dies!
TheRnRJunkie 1 year ago
@TheRnRJunkie wow what a moron you are. It is scary that their are such stupid people like you in the world.
mqldelta 1 year ago
I don't support net neutrality. it's sucks azz............
jinkdog2008 1 year ago
How's the end of the war going, Democrats?
Oh yeah, he lied about that too.
We got a much bigger government, renewal of the Patriot Act and more taxes on the way. woo hoo! Change we can believe in!
ihatemexico 1 year ago
@ihatemexico im guessing your white...
lovesababe 1 year ago
@lovesababe what difference would it make, race baiter?
ihatemexico 1 year ago
@ihatemexico lol YOU ARE!!!! hahahahaha
lovesababe 1 year ago
@ihatemexico
i agree with you, not with your username.
but yes, obama is part of a much bigger plan, hes a puppet of the oligarchs. read and watch the obama deception, loose change. look into the bilderberg.
leesard17 1 year ago
Lying makes baby Jesus cry Barry
anakin005 1 year ago 3
Hell yes, I may disagree with him on some things but go Net Neutrality, and down with Comcast!
Dwarmin 1 year ago 11
what a load of shit net neautrality = censored internet... im not sure how the fcc whose job it is to censor stuff could some how make the internet more free, and how could the internet be different or better with the FCC regulating and possibly aprroving what you put on the the internet
themose93 1 year ago
@themose93 The idea is that if the head of the FCC supports net neutrality the likelihood of the government pressing for internet control and censorship is less then say with one that is against net neutrality.
undri 1 year ago
Wow you could cut the sexual tension with a knife. Why didn't these guys just fuck and get it over with. Obama wants to pound his meaty brown eye so hard. And that sweaty interviewer would love nothing more then to bend Obama over and press his sturdy rod deep into his body cavity.
Pigskin1126 1 year ago
What a liar. Any one whos doing any research at all on this knows hes lying out his ass.
Sneak693 1 year ago
If he campaigned on it, then it means he's against it. Americans... forget it, this is an inevitable tendency, like the Health care mandate. Net Neutrality is already lost, the bad guys always win.
alecton 1 year ago
What a fucking liar!
TrueYears 1 year ago
Obama is a liar..
if not then why does he support acta
xfvkemosx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is a slight unmeritable man, meet to be sent on errands: and, though others lay these honors on this man, to ease themselves of divers slanderous loads, he shall but bear them as the ass bears gold, to groan and sweat under the business, either led or driven, as they point the way; and having brought their treasure where they will, then take they down his load and turn him off, like to the empty ass, to shake his ears and graze in commons.
GreatGrumbledook 1 year ago
You may do your will; But he's a tried and valiant soldier.
allofthenamesrtaken 1 year ago
@allofthenamesrtaken: So is my horse and for that I do appoint him store of provender: It is a creature that I teach to fight, to wind, to stop, to run directly on, his corporal motion govern'd by my spirit. and, in some taste, is president airhead but so; he must be taught, and train'd, and bid go forth: A barren-spirited fellow; one that feeds on objects, arts, and imitations, which, out of use and staled by other men, begin his fashion: do not talk of him But as a property.
GreatGrumbledook 1 year ago
[and yes: There is some totally unfitting Shakespeare quote for almost every occasion in life]
GreatGrumbledook 1 year ago
Information is powerfull... I like Obama, I like to be able to tell people why... I like to hear people tell me why I shouldn't like him. An educated public is a powerfull public. No Net Neutrality means that you may not be able to hear what anyone says, because you just used up all your internet time!
biggreenjellybean 2 years ago
Many of us are ashamed to be Democrats. More than that, we have come to fear our own Democratic Party. Hatred and corruption - the roots of socialism - are on the march as they have never been before, and leading this march is our Democratic Party. Increasingly, mainstream Democrats are uncomfortable with what we see in our party. All the more, we know it is dangerous.
DemocraticFreedom 2 years ago
What do you know about Democrats, you corporate shill? Hatred and corruption are hallmarks of your Republican friends. Nice try, DF, but anybody who chooses a name like that has an agenda. Your's is obvious. You are a wolf in a very shoddy sheep costume. Grow some brains before you try this sort of thing.
DojoNDude 2 years ago
That right? Did you know that if you take a Republican politician and a Democratic politician whipe away the lies about what they "believe" in. Take off the party blinders and only look at the policies they pass and enforce. Once you do it becomes glaringly clear that both are identical. The only difference between them are the lies and rhetoric they tell to cover up that truth.
russkeller 1 year ago
@russkeller: It is true that many vote the same way when Special Interest money is involved and many are happy to gain what they can for their states. The only real conflicts occur when they go against special interests like the insurance companies. But it's glaringly clear that Democrats favor common-sense social programs over predatory capitalism. "They're all the same," is just an excuse for being lazy about democracy.
DojoNDude 1 year ago 3
@DojoNDude Really? Justfy Obama and Congress Reinacting the PATRIOT ACT! And once you fail at that because you can't do that, Justify the Media's lack of coverage of it.
russkeller 1 year ago 2
We as Democrats are marching in a parade with people Harry Truman or even Jack Kennedy would not recognize - socialist (also know as progressives) who think that Western civilization began in 1969. Strangely, without meaning to, we the mainstream Democrats find ourselves representing this "socialist movement." However, for the "socialist" within our Democratic Party, there is nothing so strange about it. Socialist have always sought to leverage corruption for the sake of power.
DemocraticFreedom 2 years ago
our Democratic Party has already lost the equivalent of every member we have acquired over the past seven years or more. More importantly, a recent Newsweek cover declared, "We are all socialists now."
DemocraticFreedom 2 years ago
How dumb can obama be... Net Neutrality and the cost of using the internet are not the same issue. But he always has to point blame at something
Greg78X 2 years ago
@Greg78X actually, that is not true. It is the cost for using the internet that effects net neutrality. It is a cause and effect relationship.
naijabebi 2 years ago
Greg, They would charge the businesses which would create a unfair advantage and you would have a monopolised internet. It is part of the issue on an economic level.
Phase3 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show