so even though we only gained a medium amount of things from the treaty it set the stage that gave us a vast amount of things. in fact the war of 1812 (although not a victory per se) set the stage and tone of america. started the american spirit and on top of that in the long run we wound up with a whole hell of a lot of land. so the british cant claim victory if they gained nothing, we gained a lot, gained so much, and wound up with not 1 not 2 but 3 cessions from the british at some point.
your facts are far off. 1. america did stop impressment. 2. it enforced the treaty by kicking the british out of the forts they said they would leave from. 3. britain DIDNT recognize america as a nation and finally did with this war as in they official or not they never regarded it as a nation. this war solved that. this war also set the state by saying the united states would go to war with anyone, hence we wound up with oregon (by compromise) northern maine and the red river basin britain lost
bersides vietnam we won every war. our point in the war of 1812 was to enforce the treaty of paris, which ended the revolutionary war, and to stop impressment of sailors, so we went to war. yes DC was burned, but we burned the canadian parliament building. (also the vast majority of americans didnt want to occupy ontario thats just were the war happened to be fought). all of our objectives were accomplished. and it defined the united states and was probably one of the best thing weve ever done.
Sure America didn't LOSE the war of 1812, but they didn't win it either. By the time the war started, Britain accepted America as a new nation and there was no real need for "enforcing the treaty of paris" since Britain is not looking to re-colonize America.
Also, America didn't really get anything out of the war since Great Britain couldn't guarantee the stop of impressment of soldiers. The war just ended as Status quo ante bellum so it would be considered a tie.
@StoolCoiler i would be glad to explain to you why your wrong. just respond to this if you want a youtube message or something. all of your "facts" are off to a very large extent.
American gained very little from the war and suffered far worse. The war had a negative impact on its economy and caused political strife. And of course, they lost a great number of men and failed to stop future impressment of soldiers during the Napoleonic wars. Tell me, what did the Americans gain from the Treaty of Ghent? As far as I'm concerned, neither America or Britain won the war.
Also, this is a debatable question so I can't be "incorrect", its all about opinion.
The French didnt make no difference in the Revolutionary War of America. America was alone the whole time. Not only did we have the British attacking from the North and South but also Indians were raiding our towns from the West.. We overcame overwhelming odds to win. The French arrived within the last month of the war only to blockade the port at Yorktown and that was there only part. We even had german troops fighting against us. You say USA is weak, i say show me a major war that we didnt win
@chucktowne The French was helping us the whole war. French officers were helping us before French became an ally. They changed the war. We could of very likely lost the war without their help,
Germans might of been at Trenton but they also helped us along with Prussians such as Baron von Steuben training our troops
@chucktowne Seriously? We lost in Vietnam. We also lost the Seminole Wars I, II and III. We lost in the Red Clouds War, AND we lost the war of 1812 to Canada and Britain.
Also, France was a major part in why we WON the Revolutionary War. They were assisting us in various ways from the start.
@chucktowne lol mate u need to get your facts right. The French helped ya to win the war. Everyone know's it apart from you. This could either mean your slow or retarted, or a bit of both. Also like the people below me have said. You lost many wars. The only war you seem to win by your selves was when your fighting your self in the civil war. Also if you want to point out who came into a war a bit late. Try America,WW1 you join in 1917 and only lost 100,000 men compared tomillions(other nations)
@chucktowne I do not belive a single person from India steped foot in the Americas with the sole purpose of raiding American towns during the war. But i know what you meant you meant the first nations people which shows me your like 5 because you learn their politically correct name in like grade three. Stop being a racist prick.
@khead99 Don't be an ass, lots of people, including the natives themselves, use the word "Indian". Just because you find it racist doesn't mean it is.
It is a fact - The victory was a French one. dosnt matter who thay are or whatever.. its just the truth. The US would still British if it were not for the french, Yes the french there reason for helping!
@MrGrafted Yes you are right. The French has come ineed of help in wars. I am saying that the Americans couldn't won without the French but in other cases they are sometimes weak. In WWII French had a good fight with the Germans but they failed. (some were still fighting but not many) Oh so cruel the Germans were ,but thats a diffrent story.
@MrGrafted actually thats not entirely true although the french surely helped and were very much needed they did not arrive until after the major turning point of the war in which the continentals had pushed Cornwallis back to Yorktown. Only then did the french arrive and then help beseige the town and destroy the british fleet etc. etc. but even before then Cornwallis was trapped in Yorktown and the only way out was to leave on his ships which he didnt want to do because it would be his defeat
Um were the French fries...i'm mean the French(no offence) The french stop the Bristish from getting more troops and help the Americans with there ships to transport goods and Etc. Americans weren't that trained they had a lot a mili and Some continentals. George Washington help them, Trained them has hard as he can but he did not push them. They were losing volunteers (because of funding money) Washington Said some stuff (good grief i could fit it here) and they work longer and ETC sorry
@nickshipnate The French were a super power of the day, more powerfull than most conties on the planet, Make sure you get an understanding of correct history (no offence). facts are facts. You saying the french are cowards on what reason? There long history is something to be aware of. Thay have done alot more than the US have ever done. The only real fact if you know history, is that thay along with other nations around the world toke part to bring victory for inderpendence.
@nickshipnate Actually, I'm sorry, I'm American, but I think Americans are just as cowardly sometimes as the French choosing winning sides and only helping when it's in their own interest and/or somehow either directly or indirectly benefits them.
uh I dont know what scrip your reading from but the colonials did not where blue. That was a later union cooler. nor did the colonials stand in regiments when they could avoid it
Colonists didn't stand in regiments. +1 They used guerilla tactics.
However, colonists did wear blue. Of course, the Continental Army and Militias could not afford to outfit everybody with a blue uniform, but that was the standard uniform color.
in major battles they did line up like idiots, only the militia faught in guerilla tactics, and even tho the contenetal army was poor, the soldiers made their own blue uniforms
Hogwash! Colonists of every stripe marched and fought according to Manuals of Arms (Norfolk, '64, or Von Steuben). They marched & stood in neat ranks.
Yes you are right about affording coats, but very little uniform for early war national army (1775-1777) and none for militia at any time.
Even then coat color was according to the state of origin through mid-war (1777-'79) until standards of brown & blue coats were established for Continental Regs only.
I always wonder about this game. Each time I play and win a game in this its more often than not out of sheer force of numerical strength involving little tactical skill. I get compelled to think that battles here are a matter of numbers. Do you find the same ? I mean the reds outnumbered here.
I've only played this game a couple times, but I can see how that happens. It's the same with Age of empires 3. Of all the RTS I've played (I haven't played them all) AOE2 has just about the best battle tactics.
Actually, I must disagree. Sure, a dramatic difference in numbers when concerning a military situation can indeed ensure a winner, however you must consider this. for one, various units excel against other. Heavy infantry are good vs heavy and light cavalry, archers are good against heavy infantry and cavalry are good against archers. So, you have to take into account the various compensations you have to use. And flanking really works. If you can lure troops to defend one location, you can...
Bigger irony was the alliance between British Empire and France during the first World War. Both countries had a share of conflicts between them that last even for centuries.
like the flair of those old 2d games
chris1980x 6 months ago
This one is a master peace and wow, wow....
JimmyPannawong 7 months ago
Amazing clip.
MasacruRo 8 months ago
so even though we only gained a medium amount of things from the treaty it set the stage that gave us a vast amount of things. in fact the war of 1812 (although not a victory per se) set the stage and tone of america. started the american spirit and on top of that in the long run we wound up with a whole hell of a lot of land. so the british cant claim victory if they gained nothing, we gained a lot, gained so much, and wound up with not 1 not 2 but 3 cessions from the british at some point.
grovurover 9 months ago
your facts are far off. 1. america did stop impressment. 2. it enforced the treaty by kicking the british out of the forts they said they would leave from. 3. britain DIDNT recognize america as a nation and finally did with this war as in they official or not they never regarded it as a nation. this war solved that. this war also set the state by saying the united states would go to war with anyone, hence we wound up with oregon (by compromise) northern maine and the red river basin britain lost
grovurover 9 months ago
Your mother is a guerilla.
SirhcOltnam 10 months ago
the british hought they would win but america has somthing calles GUERILLA WARFARE MOTHER FUCKERS
mw2chap123 11 months ago
@mw2chap123 hahaha
mmccombs96 10 months ago
@mw2chap123 and the Brits sent their worst trained soldiers over since they were in a raging war with frace as well :P
Mematt120 10 months ago
The Patriot soundtrack
ItsMeLegit 1 year ago
Is that Mel Gibson I see?
johnnyLikeVideo 1 year ago 2
bersides vietnam we won every war. our point in the war of 1812 was to enforce the treaty of paris, which ended the revolutionary war, and to stop impressment of sailors, so we went to war. yes DC was burned, but we burned the canadian parliament building. (also the vast majority of americans didnt want to occupy ontario thats just were the war happened to be fought). all of our objectives were accomplished. and it defined the united states and was probably one of the best thing weve ever done.
grovurover 1 year ago
@grovurover
Sure America didn't LOSE the war of 1812, but they didn't win it either. By the time the war started, Britain accepted America as a new nation and there was no real need for "enforcing the treaty of paris" since Britain is not looking to re-colonize America.
Also, America didn't really get anything out of the war since Great Britain couldn't guarantee the stop of impressment of soldiers. The war just ended as Status quo ante bellum so it would be considered a tie.
StoolCoiler 9 months ago
@StoolCoiler i would be glad to explain to you why your wrong. just respond to this if you want a youtube message or something. all of your "facts" are off to a very large extent.
grovurover 9 months ago
@grovurover
American gained very little from the war and suffered far worse. The war had a negative impact on its economy and caused political strife. And of course, they lost a great number of men and failed to stop future impressment of soldiers during the Napoleonic wars. Tell me, what did the Americans gain from the Treaty of Ghent? As far as I'm concerned, neither America or Britain won the war.
Also, this is a debatable question so I can't be "incorrect", its all about opinion.
StoolCoiler 9 months ago
dude this video is totaly epic, i have the game to, both of them
TacoMan717 1 year ago
The French didnt make no difference in the Revolutionary War of America. America was alone the whole time. Not only did we have the British attacking from the North and South but also Indians were raiding our towns from the West.. We overcame overwhelming odds to win. The French arrived within the last month of the war only to blockade the port at Yorktown and that was there only part. We even had german troops fighting against us. You say USA is weak, i say show me a major war that we didnt win
chucktowne 1 year ago
@chucktowne war against obese people
guyabanongbutas 1 year ago
@chucktowne The French was helping us the whole war. French officers were helping us before French became an ally. They changed the war. We could of very likely lost the war without their help,
Germans might of been at Trenton but they also helped us along with Prussians such as Baron von Steuben training our troops
TheLadsRS 1 year ago
@chucktowne Vietnam
kavkav100 1 year ago
@chucktowne Seriously? We lost in Vietnam. We also lost the Seminole Wars I, II and III. We lost in the Red Clouds War, AND we lost the war of 1812 to Canada and Britain.
Also, France was a major part in why we WON the Revolutionary War. They were assisting us in various ways from the start.
wafflesareamazing813 1 year ago
@chucktowne lol mate u need to get your facts right. The French helped ya to win the war. Everyone know's it apart from you. This could either mean your slow or retarted, or a bit of both. Also like the people below me have said. You lost many wars. The only war you seem to win by your selves was when your fighting your self in the civil war. Also if you want to point out who came into a war a bit late. Try America,WW1 you join in 1917 and only lost 100,000 men compared tomillions(other nations)
lonesomethunder 1 year ago
@chucktowne The British were more focused on the Second Boer War at the time of the independance war. That's why we lost
ArchossWigmore 11 months ago
@ArchossWigmore yeah but we still got pwned by a bunch of poorly trained blokes. Oh well, at least we're allies now.
PivotB3stZ 11 months ago
@chucktowne I do not belive a single person from India steped foot in the Americas with the sole purpose of raiding American towns during the war. But i know what you meant you meant the first nations people which shows me your like 5 because you learn their politically correct name in like grade three. Stop being a racist prick.
khead99 10 months ago
@khead99 Don't be an ass, lots of people, including the natives themselves, use the word "Indian". Just because you find it racist doesn't mean it is.
JBBJGWC 6 months ago
I personally say that if the United States had helped out earlier in the first world war. France's defeat in world war 2 would have never happened.
Trainz476 1 year ago
It is a fact - The victory was a French one. dosnt matter who thay are or whatever.. its just the truth. The US would still British if it were not for the french, Yes the french there reason for helping!
MrGrafted 1 year ago
@MrGrafted Yes you are right. The French has come ineed of help in wars. I am saying that the Americans couldn't won without the French but in other cases they are sometimes weak. In WWII French had a good fight with the Germans but they failed. (some were still fighting but not many) Oh so cruel the Germans were ,but thats a diffrent story.
nickshipnate 1 year ago
@MrGrafted actually thats not entirely true although the french surely helped and were very much needed they did not arrive until after the major turning point of the war in which the continentals had pushed Cornwallis back to Yorktown. Only then did the french arrive and then help beseige the town and destroy the british fleet etc. etc. but even before then Cornwallis was trapped in Yorktown and the only way out was to leave on his ships which he didnt want to do because it would be his defeat
hobbitonman 1 year ago
Good job UberDigitalTyler... Nice but needs more americans
nickshipnate 1 year ago
Um were the French fries...i'm mean the French(no offence) The french stop the Bristish from getting more troops and help the Americans with there ships to transport goods and Etc. Americans weren't that trained they had a lot a mili and Some continentals. George Washington help them, Trained them has hard as he can but he did not push them. They were losing volunteers (because of funding money) Washington Said some stuff (good grief i could fit it here) and they work longer and ETC sorry
nickshipnate 1 year ago
It was a French victory, Not American. The Americans wouldnt of stood a chance really.
Something to thank the French for.
MrGrafted 1 year ago
USA + France + Spain vs GB. Americans take all credit.
Crape101 1 year ago
@MrGrafted I'm sorry, but the French are a bit of cowards.(sorry) They are likey to join the winning side sometimes there not and you know what.
nickshipnate 1 year ago
@nickshipnate The French were a super power of the day, more powerfull than most conties on the planet, Make sure you get an understanding of correct history (no offence). facts are facts. You saying the french are cowards on what reason? There long history is something to be aware of. Thay have done alot more than the US have ever done. The only real fact if you know history, is that thay along with other nations around the world toke part to bring victory for inderpendence.
MrGrafted 1 year ago
@nickshipnate Actually, I'm sorry, I'm American, but I think Americans are just as cowardly sometimes as the French choosing winning sides and only helping when it's in their own interest and/or somehow either directly or indirectly benefits them.
amazingindestructo 1 year ago
0:55 what r u guys doing get back in formation!!!!!
warhead2121 1 year ago
nice one ^^
ringingcanbeef 1 year ago
you dont get it do u? its a reinactment
XTheComradeX 1 year ago
i would have flanked at the begining and won
kris9138 1 year ago
ive got a waterloo map on mine its awsome haha
Nukemasta88 2 years ago
Probably should have had an ocean between the Americans and the Brits.
nfms12 2 years ago
what age was it?
jmcmax11 2 years ago
looks like... enlightenment?
Wikkiter 2 years ago
uh I dont know what scrip your reading from but the colonials did not where blue. That was a later union cooler. nor did the colonials stand in regiments when they could avoid it
lionheart3223 2 years ago
Colonists didn't stand in regiments. +1 They used guerilla tactics.
However, colonists did wear blue. Of course, the Continental Army and Militias could not afford to outfit everybody with a blue uniform, but that was the standard uniform color.
JBBJGWC 2 years ago
yeah maybe if they where above captin the would where bule. BTW there was not much of an "army" for the first few years
lionheart3223 2 years ago
True.
JBBJGWC 2 years ago
in major battles they did line up like idiots, only the militia faught in guerilla tactics, and even tho the contenetal army was poor, the soldiers made their own blue uniforms
steelersfanof2009 2 years ago
Hogwash! Colonists of every stripe marched and fought according to Manuals of Arms (Norfolk, '64, or Von Steuben). They marched & stood in neat ranks.
Yes you are right about affording coats, but very little uniform for early war national army (1775-1777) and none for militia at any time.
Even then coat color was according to the state of origin through mid-war (1777-'79) until standards of brown & blue coats were established for Continental Regs only.
drfoxcourt 2 years ago
@drfoxcourt You seem to be much more educated on the subject than me.
Yeah, they did form up ranks. But when it suited them to, the colonists would use guerilla tactics.
You yourself said that they wore blue, just not in till the tail end of the war.
JBBJGWC 2 years ago
@JBBJGWC militia used guerilla tatics regulars did but rarely, on the field of battle every one was in ranks
bbathtub101 2 years ago
@bbathtub101 yeah Minute men did but the Contental Troops faught in Fromation
powersmalik 1 year ago
I always wonder about this game. Each time I play and win a game in this its more often than not out of sheer force of numerical strength involving little tactical skill. I get compelled to think that battles here are a matter of numbers. Do you find the same ? I mean the reds outnumbered here.
sharadowasdr 2 years ago
I've only played this game a couple times, but I can see how that happens. It's the same with Age of empires 3. Of all the RTS I've played (I haven't played them all) AOE2 has just about the best battle tactics.
rc1309niner 2 years ago
Actually, I must disagree. Sure, a dramatic difference in numbers when concerning a military situation can indeed ensure a winner, however you must consider this. for one, various units excel against other. Heavy infantry are good vs heavy and light cavalry, archers are good against heavy infantry and cavalry are good against archers. So, you have to take into account the various compensations you have to use. And flanking really works. If you can lure troops to defend one location, you can...
Killery96 2 years ago
5-stars excellent but next time turn off the silly adventure music...and just have the musket and cannon fire...pure battle sounds only!/milwaukee
rocketshipstud2 2 years ago
LOL BAMBI
glinka57 2 years ago
how did u do this
crawp123 2 years ago
My favorite part was when it ended
Samrockswin 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
usa an england can both suck my dick
bbhaver 2 years ago
can you get this game for FREE!!!!!!!
bubbagort 2 years ago
No.
skoidat 2 years ago
Yes with torrents.
zweg2 2 years ago
warez````````.```````org
Airclot 2 years ago
what level is this
bubbagort 2 years ago
Which Revolution, American or French?
GenralMajors 2 years ago
well he said it included redcoats so im guessing the American
aWTFproduction 2 years ago
what rise of nation is this? normal one or expansion pack?
nyipnyop 2 years ago
good game
SpanGaMe 2 years ago
lol i never get borred on this game!
bunya333 3 years ago
I like the music playing in the background lol. Its from the Patriot right?
philly7132812 3 years ago
enlightment age american marine transports, and then british musketeers
Ranceman13 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Britain can defeat American losers anyday, were the only reason America is alive!
ooohpie 2 years ago
what bullshit...
FloppinPoptart623 2 years ago
Lol...and the only reason Britain is still around is because of America's intervention in WWII...oh the irony :)
ktherok594 2 years ago
No the only reason France and Belgium are still around is because of the USA's intervention. Britain AND America helped liberate it.
cjoe94 2 years ago
thats true we helped em out jus a lil bit haha wonder y? lol
brittaneyUSA 2 years ago
Bigger irony was the alliance between British Empire and France during the first World War. Both countries had a share of conflicts between them that last even for centuries.
bfahren 2 years ago
what unites did u use for this?
Ctasker5 3 years ago
i mean units. what units were used for this
Ctasker5 3 years ago
you have to make them "hold the line" that it is more organised
GeneralG666 3 years ago
rise of nations
morrowindplyr1229 3 years ago
wat game is this??
vietphan31 3 years ago
Rise Of Nations
domenikeray 3 years ago
Rise of nations! An excellent game! You should get it for PC
Ctasker5 3 years ago
the brits completley had that one. the yanks were pretty weak in that battle
chubbypenguin100 3 years ago
Confederacy? This is the revolutionary war, not the american civil war.
driecken 3 years ago
Looks like the confederacy is winning if you ask me :P
Volksgrenadier2006 3 years ago
Thats pretty damn cool. I always try to make my battles like this all organized but i get bored and they end up being shitty. lol
anarchyantelope112 3 years ago 2