I don't know about his political and/or ideological views, but he gives me the impression that electing him as US President would be a very refreshing thing to do. Being a Brig. General and one who speaks out the way he did regarding the OKC bombing, we might have a real chance of doing some serious house cleansing in Washington.
He's a Brig. General with a good sense of humour and serious common sense. It's fun listening to him, the way he present his analysis while including fitting humour; mockery of the civilian bureaucrats of federal and Okla. state govts. Definitely a great asset to have on The People's side!
Ok, kenfo0, so more TNT was used in the Beirut bombing plus the truck was under the building and it doesn't even look as damaged as the OKC bombing which used less TNT and the truck was outside? Yeah, ok, that makes sense, bomb expert.
Funny how he said that 'you will see more terrorist activities in order for them to disarm the american people' in 1998 and then 3 years later (9/11/2001) it did. He was right. Wish I had heard this back then.
The explosive mechanism in the 1983 Beirut bombing was a gas-enhanced device, probably consisting of bottled propane, butane, or acetylene, placed in proximity to a conventional explosive such as primacord. This device acted very similarly to a fuel-air or thermobaric weapon, explaining the large blast and damage.
The OKC "truck" bombing and the 1983 Beirut bombing are very different events.
The amount of explosives used in the 1983 Beirut tuck bombing was the equivalent of 12,000 pounds of TNT. In the OKC bombing it was 4,000 pounds of TNT. Also, the Beirut truck actually entered into the lobby of the Marine headquarters, thereby creating a force multiplier effect. The entire building was momentarily lifted up because of the blast.
What a bunch of hogwash. What purpose would anyone anywhere have in exploding a building? Why would you think the Gov. would do that? It was a truck bomb and anyone with any sanity knows that. This is laughable as are all those going around believing conspiracy crap. Pathetic.
so, this guy and all you other "bomb/conspiracy experts" know ALL about truck bombs, do you? (nod head no, because you don't). Google Beirut bombing pictures; pictures of the 1983 attack on Marines which went unanswered. I know people who were stationed there. "a truck bomb can't do that kind of damage"....your ass. That is exactly what was used there, and all over Beirut....take a look at pics of damage. This guy, and anyone repeating his B.S. is an idiot and a scumbag.
One way to spot a liar, is that they make jokes about horrifying circumstances. for example, here is a guy trying to tell you that the govt lied about a terror attack killing hundreds (that would be horrifying...if they do that, you as an individual are not safe), and he is cracking jokes and people in the audience laugh. How is it funny, in any way, shape or form? "hahaha...the gubmint blew up a bunch-a-folks but it couldnta been a truck bomb.....hahahahah...GET IT?". exposed.
This is false information. It is obvious in less than 30 sec, to anyone with any knowledge of explosives. He states figures for ANFO, which are correct. the OK bomb was not ANFO, therefore, B.S.
AN can be mixed with other substances which greatly increase the explosive power beyond TNT, to a factor of up to 1.6 x. Stop believing what you want to believe, and go do 5 min of research. The abject intellectual laziness and cowardice today is horrifying...why things are the way they are.
finding out all this stuff about OK City and 9/11 is like finding out you have cancer. you have to learn to be happy in your new depressing painful world with whatever time you have left. and later on you realize the happy world you thought you lived in before never existed in the first place. it was all leading you to this
@captainspaulding17 First understanding that 9/11 & OK City were media protected, covert operations equating to discovering one has cancer may apply until one realizes that the tip of the iceberg hasn't even been scratched. Who threatened Air Force 1 on 9/11and who sent the anthrax letters. What do you suppose their agenda will be for US?
I don't know about his political and/or ideological views, but he gives me the impression that electing him as US President would be a very refreshing thing to do. Being a Brig. General and one who speaks out the way he did regarding the OKC bombing, we might have a real chance of doing some serious house cleansing in Washington.
mikecorbeil 1 month ago
He's a Brig. General with a good sense of humour and serious common sense. It's fun listening to him, the way he present his analysis while including fitting humour; mockery of the civilian bureaucrats of federal and Okla. state govts. Definitely a great asset to have on The People's side!
mikecorbeil 1 month ago
God Bless The Man!
VolodiaTheElder 5 months ago
Great content. Terrible graphics.
This deserves to be redone as a good Power Point slide presentation.
thechinadesk 8 months ago
Oklahoma,9/11, ... .What is next in the series of progression?
jonnyy40 9 months ago
Ok, kenfo0, so more TNT was used in the Beirut bombing plus the truck was under the building and it doesn't even look as damaged as the OKC bombing which used less TNT and the truck was outside? Yeah, ok, that makes sense, bomb expert.
Yerizzo 9 months ago
Funny how he said that 'you will see more terrorist activities in order for them to disarm the american people' in 1998 and then 3 years later (9/11/2001) it did. He was right. Wish I had heard this back then.
TheAutumnExpresso 1 year ago
Seven Days in May...
charliemctruth 1 year ago
The explosive mechanism in the 1983 Beirut bombing was a gas-enhanced device, probably consisting of bottled propane, butane, or acetylene, placed in proximity to a conventional explosive such as primacord. This device acted very similarly to a fuel-air or thermobaric weapon, explaining the large blast and damage.
raguila11 1 year ago
The OKC "truck" bombing and the 1983 Beirut bombing are very different events.
The amount of explosives used in the 1983 Beirut tuck bombing was the equivalent of 12,000 pounds of TNT. In the OKC bombing it was 4,000 pounds of TNT. Also, the Beirut truck actually entered into the lobby of the Marine headquarters, thereby creating a force multiplier effect. The entire building was momentarily lifted up because of the blast.
raguila11 1 year ago
This should make things VERY CLEAR NOW. This was 15 years ago and we are seeing a REDO.
Magnus2552112 1 year ago
What a bunch of hogwash. What purpose would anyone anywhere have in exploding a building? Why would you think the Gov. would do that? It was a truck bomb and anyone with any sanity knows that. This is laughable as are all those going around believing conspiracy crap. Pathetic.
leebaseball11 2 years ago
so, this guy and all you other "bomb/conspiracy experts" know ALL about truck bombs, do you? (nod head no, because you don't). Google Beirut bombing pictures; pictures of the 1983 attack on Marines which went unanswered. I know people who were stationed there. "a truck bomb can't do that kind of damage"....your ass. That is exactly what was used there, and all over Beirut....take a look at pics of damage. This guy, and anyone repeating his B.S. is an idiot and a scumbag.
kenfo0 2 years ago
One way to spot a liar, is that they make jokes about horrifying circumstances. for example, here is a guy trying to tell you that the govt lied about a terror attack killing hundreds (that would be horrifying...if they do that, you as an individual are not safe), and he is cracking jokes and people in the audience laugh. How is it funny, in any way, shape or form? "hahaha...the gubmint blew up a bunch-a-folks but it couldnta been a truck bomb.....hahahahah...GET IT?". exposed.
kenfo0 2 years ago
This is false information. It is obvious in less than 30 sec, to anyone with any knowledge of explosives. He states figures for ANFO, which are correct. the OK bomb was not ANFO, therefore, B.S.
AN can be mixed with other substances which greatly increase the explosive power beyond TNT, to a factor of up to 1.6 x. Stop believing what you want to believe, and go do 5 min of research. The abject intellectual laziness and cowardice today is horrifying...why things are the way they are.
kenfo0 2 years ago
finding out all this stuff about OK City and 9/11 is like finding out you have cancer. you have to learn to be happy in your new depressing painful world with whatever time you have left. and later on you realize the happy world you thought you lived in before never existed in the first place. it was all leading you to this
captainspaulding17 3 years ago 3
@captainspaulding17 First understanding that 9/11 & OK City were media protected, covert operations equating to discovering one has cancer may apply until one realizes that the tip of the iceberg hasn't even been scratched. Who threatened Air Force 1 on 9/11and who sent the anthrax letters. What do you suppose their agenda will be for US?
onedollarwill 1 year ago
Thanks for posting and extremely important background. 5*
pondman27 3 years ago 7
Thank you and you are welcome! I agree...
Freedomlover911 3 years ago
Prophetic last words there. This man knows.
chowbelly 3 years ago 4
Thanks for reminding me. I had forgotten about that part. Yes, very prophetic indeed.
Freedomlover911 3 years ago
I got lucky stumbling upon him myself. He is the best kept secret from the OK City bombings...
Freedomlover911 3 years ago