LOL! the earths climate works in cycles, some longer than others. for example in the ice graph you sea a cycle of growth and melt. but if you zoom out (and you can blatently see this in the sea level graph) then you see the trends of global climate change.
1998-2008 or 2007 to present is not a great enough timescale to show these climate change effects, at these scales you will only see natural annual cycles. If anything it is handpicking of data, which is decieving people... for shame
Global surface temperatures in 2010 tied 2005 as the warmest on record, according to an analysis released Jan. 12, 2011 by researchers at NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York.
@terrymorse and yet strangely was also the year for a lot of record cold weather also. Here in my state we had the longest cold snap in 50 years. We weren't alone. Record freezing temps all over the world.
@GuitarGirlWA "Here in my state we had the longest cold snap in 50 years."
You're probably in the Northeast somewhere. The North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) has been negative since early 2010, bringing cooler temperatures to the Northeast US. That's a local effect, the global temperatures were sharply up in 2010.
@terrymorse No I'm in Australia. Last year Australia, NZ, Argentina, Japan, UK, Europe, Brazil & Africa all recorded record cold temperatures. That's pretty much the whole world. Europe had a massive cold wave that caused the deaths of over 90 people. Argentina's cold snap was so bad they had to import fuel. Africa's cold snap caused much crop damage causing food prices to skyrocket. I highly doubt that global temperatures are up, considering all the evidence of temperature fixing I've seen.
@GuitarGirlWA Too bad that anecdotal evidence is practically useless. Unless you want to rely on a conspiracy theory, the fact of reported global temperature increase is hard to discredit.
@terrymorse Its hard to discredit? Thats why the New Zealand NIWA was taken to court and proven to have been adjusting figures from 0.006 to 0.9. This is also why a team of scientists and Australian citizens have lodged a formal request with the ANAO to have the BOM and CSIRO audited after raw figures were found to be adjusted by up to 40%. That is also why when comparing NASA's figures with the Hadley centre NASA's results are higher. Conspiracy theory? I don't deal in theories I deal in facts.
@GuitarGirlWA Here's a bit of news: raw measurements get adjusted to compensate for inaccuracies. Then like clockwork, the deniers come out of the woodwork to cast doubt on the methodology, claiming those adjustments are artificial.
Would you next like to claim that satellite measurements of the troposphere show a cooling trend? That would be entertaining.
@GuitarGirlWA The political "audit" of the New Zealand NIWA 7-stations prompted a re-analysis of their data adjustments. The results were the same: New Zealand is getting warmer, essentially the same trend that every other temperature study has found.
Even the denialist "community" has moved beyond the "black is white" argument that there's no warming trend. Now their message is the warming trend is natural. You must not have gotten the memo.
@terrymorse Actually the truther "community" have always contested that any warming trend is natural. But I don't recall any of us actually conceding the fact that warming is happening. Even in your community they have now been forced to stop using the term "global warming" because it just isn't happening and instead are now calling it "climate change". They predicted that 2011 would be droughts for Australia. So far we've had more floods than we can handle....
Actually Global Waming is not the earth getting hotter but the climate getting more aggresive (cold our hot)....
Actually global warming is quite the oposite the earth will get more colder and very short intense heat on summer (Short summer) but thats what is starting to happen in the North.
@GostosoSPbr Stop trying to prove that it getting colder is another symptom of Global Warming. What bs! The climate changes it has done for millions of years. There were temperatures far more extreme than today in the dinosaur age, there was also far more CO2. The total human contribution to the CO2 levels in g/house gasses is 0.7%. 95% of g/house gas is made up of water vapour from the ocean, 3% is CO2. 95% of the CO2 comes from the ocean. Its 99 % natural. You have no effect on the climate.
We had elections here in Australia today. My only motivation to vote was not wanting an SDRO fine. I was hesitant on voting because both our main parties are equally gay. As I made my way to the voting booth to make a "donkey vote", I noticed Climate Sceptics Party on the ballot paper. My heart filled with joy! I voted 1: Climate Sceptics Party. LMAO
The scam here is that they choose a time for the plot from 1998 (the strongest El Nino year ever recorded) to 2008 (one of th estrongest La Ninas recorded in recent years). So they star the graph at an artificial high point and end it at an artificially low point (and old trick). If they had extended the graph through 2010 the end you would see it shoot up again with 2009 as warm as 1998 and 2010 promising to be warmer. Cheap tricks like this undermine their whole case.
If you're going to show a trend in something why not choose a larger range of data. It would be more accurate. But if you didnt cherry pick data after 1998 then a trend would be a positive trend in warming.
This video is going to be an interesting anachronism once the El Nino cycle re-establishes itself.
Oh! Did you know that, according to the sources that this video cites, Jan 2010 was the hottest on record. And March 2010 was also the hottest on record. AND Feb was the second hottest on record.
"The world we created today as a result of our thinking thus far has problems which cannot be solved by thinking the way we thought when we created them." (Albert Einstein)
Please accept the obvious: 6.8billion people do make a change to earths climate!
IPCC 1995 report, UN Scientists CONCLUSION, before editing:
No study to date has positively attributed all or part of (of climate change) to anthropogenic causes.
.
IPCC REWRITE BY Ben Santer, (and not peer reviewed), after editing: The body of . . . evidence now points to a discernible human influence on global climate.
is this for real? or is the guy that made this video that stupid that he doesn't even realize how moronic this is?
this is comparable to saying in the middle of a huge crisis like the one we are just leaving behind that employment numbers must be on the rise just because your cousin got a new job...
You just don't understand. The people pushing this global warming agenda, are the people who want to tax you on EVERYTHING! A one child policy world wide....You're just naive. I am ANGRY, fucking angry, we've been getting screwed for too long. fuck anger management, there's nothing wrong with being angry!
It was eugenics?? Don't tell me you've fallen on that conspiracy theory bandwagon too? You poor pathetic soul. Obviously, evidence and observations don't concern you. Leave it up to people like you to proclaim conspiracies when you lack the brainpower to even comprehend such difficult, complex subjects.
Are you mad? Or just a totally ignorant name caller?
Eugenics was a pseudo-science widely embraced by many elites in the early 20th century. Look up Margaret Sanger, and what she advocated. President Woodrow Wilson advocated involuntary sterilization.
Educate youself about the history of widely adopted junk science before you make yourself look sillier than Al Gore, or more dishonest than HadCRU.
"We are being conned" it says in the end - how can anybody feel conned by this? Can you not think? No matter what, pollution is pollution and it DOES kill man and species every day. What harm can it do to ANYONE to decrease the amount of poison and chemicals in the environment - but the big, irresponsible companies, that ONLY think of profit? Will you deny holocaust too? Behave yourselves.
What happens to a farmer who thinks ahead and plants an orchard of trees in line with IPCC predictions. Then after ten years of sustainable farm practice and honest hard work looses the lot in the cold?
This is just one example of damage that can be done. There are countless thousands of others.
Siliggy - There are probably more examples that proof that sustainable gardening and production is way better for everything in the environment - including ourselves. Have you heard of biodynamic gardening? The problem with GMO´s is it is exclusively started because of interests in profit, and monopoly (the murderers in Monsanto), so we are up against very tough forces in this matter. The process is irreversible - very, very scary. Bio-diversity is essential for our planet´s survival.
Thank you for reminding me of my fellow countryman Svensmark´s protuberance theory - had almost forgotten it - how can it be he is not in the medias very much, do you think? When I first heard of his theories some years ago, I was flabbergasted... Anyway, I still hope human kind will start taking care of our planet instead of exploiting it even more. There are so many trees cut down every day. What do you think of Lomborg, may I ask - is he to be taken serious? Enjoy you day!
I'll agree that pollution is bad, but keep in mind that CO2 is not a pollutant . The Holocaust did happen and I don't think many people will disagree. It's not the same thing as denying AGW because there is factual evidence that it AGW doesn't exist.
Is this an argument? IF it is, apparently it's not referring to CLIMATE. By the way, did anyone HAPPEN to take note of the current state of the sun and the lack of sunspots? Ammunition for the purely amateur climate skeptic by cutting down the evidence into whatever size box you want to make your case. That's easy. Too bad for them it takes real effort and work to understand what is real.
At least it is data. Compare that to "The snows of Kilimanjaro are on account of AGW." "Polar bears are dying because of lack of ice."
I know, these things are science, but observation is not. You leftist AGW people used every chance to throw unrelated links in the face of the populace. How dare you quibble with real data.
The "amateur skeptics" are at least not fabricating their data.
They don't have to; the correlation between solar radiance is massive, while CO2 and temp now go in OPPOSITE directions, creating the need for the disgraceful HadCRU and Hansen frauds.
Oh, and tell us another lie about the polar bears,who are doing better than ever.
Oh, you're talking 'correlations'? Funny that, because I'm not. Pity you for falling on your face in assuming the CO2 and temps have a lockstep monotonic relationship, completely ignorant of the fact that a great multitude of things influence climate.
CO2, is a GHG. It's lifetime in the atmosphere, has the potential for force climate. This is all simple physics. The recent warming, for some reason can't be explained by anything other than CO2. Period.
Notice that in the paleo-climatic record CO2 rose AFTER temperature rose. If there was any correlation at all, it was opposite to the Warmist contention.
Recent warming? As in since 1998?
Please Google "global temperature since 1998" then reconcile the fact that CO2 rose each and every year over the last since, but temperature went the other way.
Word to the wise the New World religion is on the rise An iron fist in a velvet glove is grasping your throats in the name of green love Like a flock of birds the public's thoughts are guided by politically correct words to conform as they should for the approval of being good Few have a hope of escaping a sociological raping of this scope a tsunami of change is breaking on our shores & soon the green police will be breaking down our doors to put a choke chain leash on you & yours
Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.
That sea rise graph is a bit deceptive. A better explanation would be that the rate of sea level rise is not increasing, as predicted. Sea levels, regardless of whether humans are here or not, would be rising every single year as we are still emerging from the last ice age. A detailed look at that graph shows this minimal rise each year, and there is no acceleration whatsoever. The assumptions made about sea level rise appears to be quite exaggerated based upon that adat.
Errr this is true but we have a reasonable idea about why this is and it isn't 100% true that the recent flat trend means climate change is canceld. When you measure from a high point it is easy to make that claim.
But it is importent because it shows that models lack very important parameters.
I am a climate skeptic and this argument needs to made correctly..
Hi EasyEs, have a look at the recent work by Prof Richard Lindzen MIT (20 year ERBE experiment). He has shown why the IPCC predictive models are wrong. Its to do with IPCC models overestimating feedback factors, ie: CO2 warming effect being amplified too much by water vapour. Lindzen's experiment shows the error. AGW will soon be shown to be wrong I hope it can be corrected before we bankrupt ourselves solving a problem that does not exist.
@barsoapdish Yes, that Eric Blair was quite quotable. Too bad it's not the scientists doing the deceiving. It's people like this poster who have fallen for the pseudo-intelligent and soothing words of well-funded spinners like the heritage foundation.
Of course it's not warming that's why the idiots call it climate change now. If most the people in the world knew the difference between CO and CO2 they wouldn't get away with calling CO2 a pollutant. This is nothing but phony science and corrupt politicians.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
It is the clam before the storm! (joking) I dont think we have a clue what is going on with global warming but when it all boils down I bet it has to do with the rising human population.
LOL! the earths climate works in cycles, some longer than others. for example in the ice graph you sea a cycle of growth and melt. but if you zoom out (and you can blatently see this in the sea level graph) then you see the trends of global climate change.
1998-2008 or 2007 to present is not a great enough timescale to show these climate change effects, at these scales you will only see natural annual cycles. If anything it is handpicking of data, which is decieving people... for shame
haz020190 8 months ago
Global surface temperatures in 2010 tied 2005 as the warmest on record, according to an analysis released Jan. 12, 2011 by researchers at NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York.
Science Daily January 14, 2011
terrymorse 11 months ago
@terrymorse and yet strangely was also the year for a lot of record cold weather also. Here in my state we had the longest cold snap in 50 years. We weren't alone. Record freezing temps all over the world.
GuitarGirlWA 10 months ago
@GuitarGirlWA "Here in my state we had the longest cold snap in 50 years."
You're probably in the Northeast somewhere. The North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) has been negative since early 2010, bringing cooler temperatures to the Northeast US. That's a local effect, the global temperatures were sharply up in 2010.
terrymorse 10 months ago
@terrymorse No I'm in Australia. Last year Australia, NZ, Argentina, Japan, UK, Europe, Brazil & Africa all recorded record cold temperatures. That's pretty much the whole world. Europe had a massive cold wave that caused the deaths of over 90 people. Argentina's cold snap was so bad they had to import fuel. Africa's cold snap caused much crop damage causing food prices to skyrocket. I highly doubt that global temperatures are up, considering all the evidence of temperature fixing I've seen.
GuitarGirlWA 10 months ago
@GuitarGirlWA Oh... I forgot the USA also lol
GuitarGirlWA 10 months ago
@GuitarGirlWA Too bad that anecdotal evidence is practically useless. Unless you want to rely on a conspiracy theory, the fact of reported global temperature increase is hard to discredit.
terrymorse 10 months ago
@terrymorse Its hard to discredit? Thats why the New Zealand NIWA was taken to court and proven to have been adjusting figures from 0.006 to 0.9. This is also why a team of scientists and Australian citizens have lodged a formal request with the ANAO to have the BOM and CSIRO audited after raw figures were found to be adjusted by up to 40%. That is also why when comparing NASA's figures with the Hadley centre NASA's results are higher. Conspiracy theory? I don't deal in theories I deal in facts.
GuitarGirlWA 10 months ago
@GuitarGirlWA Here's a bit of news: raw measurements get adjusted to compensate for inaccuracies. Then like clockwork, the deniers come out of the woodwork to cast doubt on the methodology, claiming those adjustments are artificial.
Would you next like to claim that satellite measurements of the troposphere show a cooling trend? That would be entertaining.
terrymorse 10 months ago
@terrymorse and that's why they want to audit them.....
get your head out of the sand
GuitarGirlWA 10 months ago
@GuitarGirlWA The political "audit" of the New Zealand NIWA 7-stations prompted a re-analysis of their data adjustments. The results were the same: New Zealand is getting warmer, essentially the same trend that every other temperature study has found.
Even the denialist "community" has moved beyond the "black is white" argument that there's no warming trend. Now their message is the warming trend is natural. You must not have gotten the memo.
terrymorse 10 months ago
@terrymorse Actually the truther "community" have always contested that any warming trend is natural. But I don't recall any of us actually conceding the fact that warming is happening. Even in your community they have now been forced to stop using the term "global warming" because it just isn't happening and instead are now calling it "climate change". They predicted that 2011 would be droughts for Australia. So far we've had more floods than we can handle....
GuitarGirlWA 10 months ago
Actually Global Waming is not the earth getting hotter but the climate getting more aggresive (cold our hot)....
Actually global warming is quite the oposite the earth will get more colder and very short intense heat on summer (Short summer) but thats what is starting to happen in the North.
GostosoSPbr 1 year ago
@GostosoSPbr Stop trying to prove that it getting colder is another symptom of Global Warming. What bs! The climate changes it has done for millions of years. There were temperatures far more extreme than today in the dinosaur age, there was also far more CO2. The total human contribution to the CO2 levels in g/house gasses is 0.7%. 95% of g/house gas is made up of water vapour from the ocean, 3% is CO2. 95% of the CO2 comes from the ocean. Its 99 % natural. You have no effect on the climate.
GuitarGirlWA 10 months ago
We had elections here in Australia today. My only motivation to vote was not wanting an SDRO fine. I was hesitant on voting because both our main parties are equally gay. As I made my way to the voting booth to make a "donkey vote", I noticed Climate Sceptics Party on the ballot paper. My heart filled with joy! I voted 1: Climate Sceptics Party. LMAO
WOGI5M 1 year ago 3
The scam here is that they choose a time for the plot from 1998 (the strongest El Nino year ever recorded) to 2008 (one of th estrongest La Ninas recorded in recent years). So they star the graph at an artificial high point and end it at an artificially low point (and old trick). If they had extended the graph through 2010 the end you would see it shoot up again with 2009 as warm as 1998 and 2010 promising to be warmer. Cheap tricks like this undermine their whole case.
drkstrong 1 year ago 2
These are such classic climate change denialist blurbs that I can't tell whether or not this is parody.
quidproquo2004 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@quidproquo2004 said "These are such classic climate change denialist blurbs that I can't tell whether or not this is parody."
I use hanlons razor to decide "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity".
newusername01 1 year ago
Are you serious with this?
If you're going to show a trend in something why not choose a larger range of data. It would be more accurate. But if you didnt cherry pick data after 1998 then a trend would be a positive trend in warming.
b0b0maj0 1 year ago
This video is going to be an interesting anachronism once the El Nino cycle re-establishes itself.
Oh! Did you know that, according to the sources that this video cites, Jan 2010 was the hottest on record. And March 2010 was also the hottest on record. AND Feb was the second hottest on record.
robhoneycutt 1 year ago
This is hilarious !
Check out the Sea Level slide, that clearly shows an increase since 1994.
Comment: "it is stable since 2006"
Of course on TV you don't have time to check it out, so you just listen to the main message.
But with Youtube magic "pause" button, the lack of good faith is exposed.
Tobias99100 1 year ago
Very good should open the eyes of the ignorant that continually live a life of political lies myths and fairy tales.
chotaboy66 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The world we created today as a result of our thinking thus far has problems which cannot be solved by thinking the way we thought when we created them." (Albert Einstein)
Please accept the obvious: 6.8billion people do make a change to earths climate!
guldisloo11 2 years ago
You might as well say, "the northern hemisphere has been cooling since September".
Anybody with half a brain can see through this crock.
HydrogenAlpha 2 years ago 3
Bush Vision can FUCK OFF!!!!!
MickyD61909 2 years ago
Watch:
"The final choice" Part 1 to 4 by Mrrockitman
watch?v=rV3D7TAqSNg
Great video telling the truth about Bush's vision on cimate change.
tantpwei 2 years ago
idiot crap
aerobique 2 years ago
How to invent Anthropogenic Global Warming.
IPCC 1995 report, UN Scientists CONCLUSION, before editing:
No study to date has positively attributed all or part of (of climate change) to anthropogenic causes.
.
IPCC REWRITE BY Ben Santer, (and not peer reviewed), after editing: The body of . . . evidence now points to a discernible human influence on global climate.
FreeAgain2 2 years ago
retard
wdgeo 2 years ago
Skeptical about global warming?
Read this article in Skeptical Science:
skepticalscience. com/ Empirical-evidence-that-humans -are-causing-global-warming. html
(remove the spaces)
wdgeo 2 years ago
what's the data say about peoples global health standing ?
truthiseverall 2 years ago
lol, what the fuck?!?
is this for real? or is the guy that made this video that stupid that he doesn't even realize how moronic this is?
this is comparable to saying in the middle of a huge crisis like the one we are just leaving behind that employment numbers must be on the rise just because your cousin got a new job...
moronic!
tommytalks77 2 years ago
watch?v=Cl4Pz1mwBao
siliggy 2 years ago
Comment removed
GnosticNinja 2 years ago
Lets fuck these lying totalitarian bitches up....This is the best news I've heard in so long. David Rockefeller must be crying!
32GaugeSlug 2 years ago 2
Seriously, sign-up for a class on anger management. Seriously!
... And then look up the definition of totalitarian.
wdgeo 2 years ago
You just don't understand. The people pushing this global warming agenda, are the people who want to tax you on EVERYTHING! A one child policy world wide....You're just naive. I am ANGRY, fucking angry, we've been getting screwed for too long. fuck anger management, there's nothing wrong with being angry!
32GaugeSlug 2 years ago 3
The world rolls the way it wants to!
mjkwyo 2 years ago
You have to go back to the early 20th century to see a scientific fraud this large, with huge consequences.
It was eugenics.
LPLandingZone 2 years ago
It was eugenics?? Don't tell me you've fallen on that conspiracy theory bandwagon too? You poor pathetic soul. Obviously, evidence and observations don't concern you. Leave it up to people like you to proclaim conspiracies when you lack the brainpower to even comprehend such difficult, complex subjects.
jffryfnt 2 years ago
Are you mad? Or just a totally ignorant name caller?
Eugenics was a pseudo-science widely embraced by many elites in the early 20th century. Look up Margaret Sanger, and what she advocated. President Woodrow Wilson advocated involuntary sterilization.
Educate youself about the history of widely adopted junk science before you make yourself look sillier than Al Gore, or more dishonest than HadCRU.
See: wikipedia org/wiki/Eugenics
LPLandingZone 2 years ago
"We are being conned" it says in the end - how can anybody feel conned by this? Can you not think? No matter what, pollution is pollution and it DOES kill man and species every day. What harm can it do to ANYONE to decrease the amount of poison and chemicals in the environment - but the big, irresponsible companies, that ONLY think of profit? Will you deny holocaust too? Behave yourselves.
Oblentehands 2 years ago
Oblentehands
What happens to a farmer who thinks ahead and plants an orchard of trees in line with IPCC predictions. Then after ten years of sustainable farm practice and honest hard work looses the lot in the cold?
This is just one example of damage that can be done. There are countless thousands of others.
siliggy 2 years ago
Siliggy - There are probably more examples that proof that sustainable gardening and production is way better for everything in the environment - including ourselves. Have you heard of biodynamic gardening? The problem with GMO´s is it is exclusively started because of interests in profit, and monopoly (the murderers in Monsanto), so we are up against very tough forces in this matter. The process is irreversible - very, very scary. Bio-diversity is essential for our planet´s survival.
Oblentehands 2 years ago
Oblentehands
I will have a look at biodynamic gardening. Sounds interesting. Yes genetic engineering is also very scary. It could go very wrong.
Please have a look at what this Danish guy has to say:
watch?v=n1qGOUIRac0
Henrik Svensmark on Global Warming (part 1)
siliggy 2 years ago
Hi Siliggy!
Thank you for reminding me of my fellow countryman Svensmark´s protuberance theory - had almost forgotten it - how can it be he is not in the medias very much, do you think? When I first heard of his theories some years ago, I was flabbergasted... Anyway, I still hope human kind will start taking care of our planet instead of exploiting it even more. There are so many trees cut down every day. What do you think of Lomborg, may I ask - is he to be taken serious? Enjoy you day!
Oblentehands 2 years ago
Oblentehands peace to you
Sorry not familiar with Lomborg to comment but he counts as yet another Non "consensus" scientist.
It will be interesting to see if "hadleygate" proves him correct in some of his so called errors.
On the other hand my knowledge and interests do allow an understanding of Svensmark's work and I reckon HE HAS NAILED IT!
Some proof by measurement of this can be found if you search:
4_12_Palle Shows surprising interannual coherence and a large decadal variability
siliggy 2 years ago
@Oblentehands
I'll agree that pollution is bad, but keep in mind that CO2 is not a pollutant . The Holocaust did happen and I don't think many people will disagree. It's not the same thing as denying AGW because there is factual evidence that it AGW doesn't exist.
Could you provide evidence that it does?
KrazyGerman29 2 years ago
Haha lucky no one is gonna be fooled by this crap since the ad is made so poorly.
What a poor and dated argument -get with the programme guys.
jaydenluke 2 years ago
express you opinion about the AGW scam at
sciencemuseum org uk
AGWtruth1 2 years ago
'Recent trends show...'?
Is this an argument? IF it is, apparently it's not referring to CLIMATE. By the way, did anyone HAPPEN to take note of the current state of the sun and the lack of sunspots? Ammunition for the purely amateur climate skeptic by cutting down the evidence into whatever size box you want to make your case. That's easy. Too bad for them it takes real effort and work to understand what is real.
jffryfnt 2 years ago
At least it is data. Compare that to "The snows of Kilimanjaro are on account of AGW." "Polar bears are dying because of lack of ice."
I know, these things are science, but observation is not. You leftist AGW people used every chance to throw unrelated links in the face of the populace. How dare you quibble with real data.
edbarbarg 2 years ago
The "amateur skeptics" are at least not fabricating their data.
They don't have to; the correlation between solar radiance is massive, while CO2 and temp now go in OPPOSITE directions, creating the need for the disgraceful HadCRU and Hansen frauds.
Oh, and tell us another lie about the polar bears,who are doing better than ever.
You lying demagogues.
LPLandingZone 2 years ago
'Amateur skeptics' DON'T HAVE DATA, period!
Oh, you're talking 'correlations'? Funny that, because I'm not. Pity you for falling on your face in assuming the CO2 and temps have a lockstep monotonic relationship, completely ignorant of the fact that a great multitude of things influence climate.
CO2, is a GHG. It's lifetime in the atmosphere, has the potential for force climate. This is all simple physics. The recent warming, for some reason can't be explained by anything other than CO2. Period.
jffryfnt 2 years ago
Thin fraud.
Notice that in the paleo-climatic record CO2 rose AFTER temperature rose. If there was any correlation at all, it was opposite to the Warmist contention.
Recent warming? As in since 1998?
Please Google "global temperature since 1998" then reconcile the fact that CO2 rose each and every year over the last since, but temperature went the other way.
LPLandingZone 2 years ago
xaedmon 2 years ago 5
and delusions of paranoia...ugh.
jffryfnt 2 years ago
The global warming scandal of the century
Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.
BruceH59 2 years ago 2
That sea rise graph is a bit deceptive. A better explanation would be that the rate of sea level rise is not increasing, as predicted. Sea levels, regardless of whether humans are here or not, would be rising every single year as we are still emerging from the last ice age. A detailed look at that graph shows this minimal rise each year, and there is no acceleration whatsoever. The assumptions made about sea level rise appears to be quite exaggerated based upon that adat.
krf7 2 years ago 3
Fuck Kevin Rudd... he's a cunt....
kikividis 2 years ago 2
About time the truth started to be heard. Man-made climate change is indeed the hoax of the century.
fmackz 2 years ago 7
Errr this is true but we have a reasonable idea about why this is and it isn't 100% true that the recent flat trend means climate change is canceld. When you measure from a high point it is easy to make that claim.
But it is importent because it shows that models lack very important parameters.
I am a climate skeptic and this argument needs to made correctly..
EasyEs 2 years ago
Hi EasyEs, have a look at the recent work by Prof Richard Lindzen MIT (20 year ERBE experiment). He has shown why the IPCC predictive models are wrong. Its to do with IPCC models overestimating feedback factors, ie: CO2 warming effect being amplified too much by water vapour. Lindzen's experiment shows the error. AGW will soon be shown to be wrong I hope it can be corrected before we bankrupt ourselves solving a problem that does not exist.
alignwithtruth 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
aggressive0001 2 years ago
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act".
barsoapdish 2 years ago 14
@barsoapdish Yes, that Eric Blair was quite quotable. Too bad it's not the scientists doing the deceiving. It's people like this poster who have fallen for the pseudo-intelligent and soothing words of well-funded spinners like the heritage foundation.
quidproquo2004 1 year ago
Of course it's not warming that's why the idiots call it climate change now. If most the people in the world knew the difference between CO and CO2 they wouldn't get away with calling CO2 a pollutant. This is nothing but phony science and corrupt politicians.
1965ace 2 years ago 30
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It is the clam before the storm! (joking) I dont think we have a clue what is going on with global warming but when it all boils down I bet it has to do with the rising human population.
ndyt 2 years ago
snow storm
Alvin691 2 years ago 4
wow, just wow. Here people is a very good example of a sheep produced by modern society
tHoM0r 2 years ago
tHoM0r, so you think the CO2 output of North America would be the same if the population was the same as it was 100 years ago?
ndyt 2 years ago
5 stars and faved. Excellent. Cheers
davidnightingale 2 years ago 9