Added: 3 years ago
From: JohnCharles2007
Views: 72,201
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (494)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Simple answer: Find out on heaven

  • Paul mcCartney had written along with john lennon all Beatles songs up until sgt peppers

    Why is it that after that George started writing with john and their entire genre changed ??

    Drug experimentation is a reason, but why was Paul all of a sudden learning the songs instead of creating

    His solo career minus wings hasnt been anything amazing

    For a guy who wrote some of the Beatles songs during Beatles mania "i was Willy Campbell" and that who he'll always be

  • There are two... fact

  • @miss9starr7 what do you mean, how I know what ? what I've said was just what I've meant.how do you know you know everything about the Beatles or something ?

  • Wasn't Will Campbell Jr. the musician from "Marmalade" who did a cover of Ob-la-di Ob-la-da ?

  • Thanks for posting. I cannot believe anyone out there really believes that Paul died. Paul's success after the BEATLES shows the same amazing talent.....no one could duplicate his talent...

  • @beatleskris Yes because Faul is far more talented than Paul haha, and I don't see how talent is restricted only to Paul McCartney, is he the only talented person in the world somehow because you're a fan of him??? How does that follow any logic sorry I can't see. The answer you want is that the impersonator is a ***well known*** person as am imitator AND a musician (mostly 50s-60s?),is named Phil Ackrill and all randomly anything relevant to him has completely disappeared from wiki... :D

  • @beatleskris Terrifying abortions such as 'Simply having...' and 'Ebony and Ivory' are contenders for the worst songs written by ANYONE. Wings was truly dreadful apart from the material penned by Denny Laine.

  • investigate cambells blood group. Paul is group B minor.

  • @originallove911 how do you know that...?

  • 20 years of surgery, ten years of Photoshop.

  • In spite of the fact that I was dealing with a close minded, illiterate, illogical, sociopathic moron, I do appreciate that I had the opportunity to expose the complete lack of evidence and idiocy concerning the entire fictitious "Paul is dead" scenario. It's absolutely moronic but what's even more moronic is engaging in sophomoric "debates" with deluded individuals who actually believe this absolutely unreal lie. Remember folks: Occam's razor FTW!

  • not for anyone else but for people that are not fooled easily, and thanks for giving me the chance to prove my point /watch?v=qWhQJ-V5FiU&feature=r­elated

  • Image and video scaling is a much different issue to analogies between one part of the face and another and the whole head to background etc. Analogies do never change as a total sum if we have to deal with all face or body parts.

  • @RockOnHellas You're a fool and I'm not wasting another second on someone as illiterate and incoherent such as yourself. That doesn't make you wrong. You're wrong because you have ZERO evidence to back up your assumptions and you know it. Common sense proves I'm right and you know that too. Good luck on getting your mental health evaluated and cured. English is the language of international business. If you want to be taken seriously you'd better dramatically improve your grammar.

  • @maripocita37 My grammar is fine except some very obvious ( at least to a a healthy minded individual) typing mistakes due to speed , if height isn't direct evidence for you, well you must either assert any new knowledge you scraped to the scientific community,or you are a victim AND mentally deficient possibly. Also from the start everything I wrote, is fully coherent, even if you disagree, it is you that is of very low intelligence and can't interpret the most simple things ever. goodbye

  • *can't even see that

    *out of his head

  • You're so silly, you're comparing Faul with a younger Faul. Of course they look exactly alike!

  • Great job in putting to rest the ridiculous and demeaning story that Paul McCartney died in 1966 and was replaced by a lookalike! The real mystery is why the story was seeded in the first place and why. There seems to have been several leading and intriguing false clues presented to the public. I remember listening to the reverse speech on I'm So Tired where John declares "Paul is a dead man: miss him, miss him, miss him". Was this motivated by a cynical and devious resentment on John's part?

  • HAHAHAHAHAHH Oh my God, this guy looks the same....or Paul is really dead or Bill Campbell its the most fucking awesome impostor that I see in my whole life, not even Francisco Franco, Hitler, Stalin or Napoleon have so great doubles than Paul...what a joke...someday im gonna make a movie about this like JFK or something...

  • WOW! iT'S paul younger and then older! gosh......sounds like a conspiracy.!

  • what's the point with this vid? everyone can see it's paul? lol?

  • es el mismoo!! no hay duda

  • Es el mismo! ya ni le busquen!!

  • Can't really compare people with a 20 year age difference, can you now? And scream, oeh there are some changes, of course there are, it's called aging... ignorance is growing out of preportions lately :S.

  • Still think Paul was in a terrible auto accident and died...but was brought back to life, something not unheard of and would explain so much more than some surrogate Paul to take his place. William Shears could have been used as a photo/press double just to allow time for Paul to recover without freaking-out the entire freaking world. And if he did die, it'd make more sense to break-up the band as I seriously doubt John of all people would have gone along with that; he and Paul were dear friends

  • come on we all no its stevie riks who took pauls place ha ha larf out loud dead my arse

  • but hey maybe Paul really have a double, you know for security or to distract crazy fans

  • jajajajajaj its the same guy!!!!

  • Paul is dead? What a fu*king insult. As if a god like Paul McCartney could just be replaced that easy.

  • otherwise there would be no conspiracies, like in the beetles songs DUH

  • hes dead, god u stupid if you think not, you think people dont look alike?? then u wrong

  • what on earth is the point of this pish?????

  • Still as cute as he was when he was 24. :)

  • Those who believe he is dead , expect him to look today like he did on 1965 LOL xD

  • is not dead.

  • World War 3 will be started by disagreements about whether Paul McCartney is dead or alive. The Paul Mcnazis will try to control Europe but they will encounter fierce resistance from Lennon

  • Can't we reach a compromise and say that Paul is both alive AND dead?

  • @breeeegs Why would we do that, when we could just say he's alive?

  • So you're saying we should divide our religion into sects based on those who accept the alive-ness of McCartney and those who believe he is dead and has been replaced by an impostor? An interesting proposition. I will have to forward this to the archbishop of silly faiths.

  • @breeeegs

    Schrodinger's Paul?

  • no Paul's cat

  • Tavistock institute created The Beatles. Paul McCartney created nothing. The current one is a fake. There is no better place to hide lies than just in front of you.

  • LoL I see the same person! I have to think people are just having fun.

  • Comment removed

  • If Paul McCartney died in 1965 then Billy Shears is one hell of a talented guy.

  • Pause at 0:05 mirror image i tell ya.

  • When people grow old take Drugs,Death's,Stress,malnutrit­ion whatever it is does (CHANGE) a person may it be physically or mentally....Get it?

  • It looks like the same person (same eyebrows and face shape), but look at the lips. In the black & white video, the lips are smaller and fuller. I think that was Pearl Cornioley (Witherington). If it is the same person, it's Phil Ackrill as Paul. He took over in 1980 from Faul.

  • I'm in the weird part of YT again

  • To end all this bullshit just take a DNA test with a family person

  • @conductor5001 they have and it was positive but there is always some theorist that belives that the test was fake..

  • Are the dates correct? What are the precise dates? Where's any pattern recognition analysis?

  • It looks like the same Paul to me. Comparing Paul's 1965 photos with 1967 photos you can see that his teeth formation are also exactly the same. Finding someone who looked close enough to be able to fool everyone with some plastic surgery and who also had the same teeth pattern, would have been next to impossible. And...that the replacement Paul was as talented as the original Paul makes it that much more absurd.

  • Hard to tell the difference but there is really only two ways to prove the truth, DNA or find William Campbell !!!!

  • 1966 he was killed  replaced with a human clone

  • @Killuminatiuk I've found a new level of stupidity.

  • This Paul did some of the best songs of all time after the 66, so, I'm glad he died.!!!!! LOL

  • Lol at people who think he's dead

  • Do people really think Paul McCartney died and was replaced or are they joking? Plastic Surgery sucks in 2011. It would have sucked big time in the 60's. Genius songs like Penny Lane and difficult songs to sing like Magical Mystery Tour and complex bass lines like on Rain don't come from just anyone especially overnight.

  • @maripocita37 go to plasticmacca.blogspot.com

  • @maripocita37 There are as many idiots that believe Paul is dead that believe Elvis is alive. For some it's easier to belief anything but the truth.

  • @TCBINAFLASH1 It's just amazing to me anyone would believe that technology is even possible in 2012 let alone in the 60's. Then the fake Paul goes on to have a very successful solo career.

  • @maripocita37 You haven't present a single decisive clue as to why Paul is NOT dead or replaced. All your arguments can be answered with much more convicing thoughts that your mind doesn't reach at the time, so never ever reach conclusions if you are not 100% sure you have all the facts down, and even if you have them then place some minor doubt again. On the contray PIDers can provide an infinite number of clues, forensic, logical, historical, social on why Paul IS dead or replaced.

  • @RockOnHellas I'm sorry, I don't speak crazy. I strongly suggest you see your physician and implore him to up the dosage.

  • @maripocita37 You are being fed your dosage a lifetime and yet to realize or accept it.

  • @RockOnHellas Do you fail to realize you're incoherent? This alone shreds your entire credibility and makes it pointless to carry on realistic discourse with you. When ones make even rational assertions (which PID is not) it's up to them to prove their case. The PID people have failed miserably. EOS.

  • @maripocita37

    I don't see what is incoherent in what I wrote, and also as you've seen I do not only assert that Paul's dead or replaced ( prob dead) but that most possibly ONLY ringo is the same individual pre and post 1966.

    "The PID people have failed miserably."

    This BY COMMON LOGIC, asserts that you are not 100% sure for what you say, although your arguments are indeed reasonable on first sight. So let's begin and see who is mentally unsteady and irreasonable.

  • @RockOnHellas All joking aside, you really seem mentally unstable. Your PIA and PID lists are laughable and explanation of "COMMON LOGIC" is incorrect. I would rip apart your ridiculous assumptions with ease but it's pointless to have a conversation with you and I have so little free time. I do suggest you seek help for your horrendous grammar and lack of "COMMON SENSE". For your own sake I hope you're simply trolling and don't really believe the nonsense you expound.

  • You are blinded, you know it very well but you play this stupid game when you see that the world you live in isnt approachively this retarded thing ( in it's structures) you have in your mind, PID is nothing, you can't deal mentally with the truth, you chose to ignore hard facts such as FORENSIC EVIDENCE. Well, I have chosen the way to see the truth in all my life and deal with it logically and become hard rather than diving in emotional dealing with everything fangirl, the problem is YOU people

  • @RockOnHellas The evidence of McCartney having remained alive and leading the Beatles is self-evident. You are horrifically ignorant, functionally illiterate, paranoid and probably mentally ill. I respect people who attach conspiracy theories to many events, even if I don't agree with their opinions. You have not presented a single fact nor anything except concocted "clues" by presenting things out of context either deliberately or because you're ignorant. You're 100% deluded.

  • @maripocita37 Wrong, you are out of respect to other commentators as seen by your first messages ( not only directed to me) and ofc I retaliated back, all you have to offer is personal attacks, never evidence drawn from cold logic, you haven't rebutted anything yet and ofc forensic evidence. If you do prove that forensic evidence is wrong and explain also why is it wrong appart from titling it "ridiculous" "crazy" then I will take it as granted that I am a nut.

  • @RockOnHellas You see, when someone is as mentally absent as you are, it's pointless to reply to them. I don't respect anyone who believes PID but I do respect those who believes in viable conspiracies. The PID carries no credibility. You see "clues" because you want to see them. Lennon said 'anything fits if you're want to make it fit'. Try as they might the music industry can't produce a band that looks, sounds and is as innovative as the Beatles were, but YOU can? HAHAHAHHAAHHAH

  • Beatles were a REALLY overhyped band, very average on my opinion in most of their songs but nonetheless pre and post 1966 having to offer some innovative and memorable tracks. FORENSIC EVIDENCE - search: plastic-macca forensic-science-proves-paul-w­­as.html - when you are mentally efficient to disprove this, I will admit my wrongdoings, in contrast to you that is convinced you are right... that will be a great laugh now if you disprove forensic evidence by experts used in many other cases

  • @maripocita To everything we don't know and are not sure we have all the facts down ( whatever the nature of these facts are) our natural mind state is doubt even at a very minimum level, except ofc several occasions that we can prove undoubtedly the truth. Here you are 100% sure that no one is dead/replaced, I can very well present you an imitator band of the now beatles, tell you they are the original and because they look 80% the same you will believe it, yet to see any evidence as claimed

  • You've one million facts and clues - most clues put in album covers after 1966 and the yellow submarine film, I didn't put them there, they did definetely, and they all point very specifically to the theory that PID, you can't even see than at any rate it's them that feeded it, they created actually, no one took it out of his dead, and no one is taking things out of context when 100 comments/references/symbolisms­ point towards pauls death, yet forensic evidence proves it beyond doubt.

  • @RockOnHellas Keep looking and you'll find 100000000000 "clues" that PID. It's still a load of garbage. You can find them while watching Finding Nemo or the Bible. You can take any load of rubbish and "make it work" but it's still nonsense. Keep on fighting the windmills.

  • @maripocita37 search: plastic-macca forensic-science-proves-paul-w­­­as.html

    Keep looking and you'll find 100000000000 "clues" that PID is NOT true. the only clue you have is that they are talented, FFS, see how ridiculous your claim are for once, now take the chill pill. What you do is delve into a happy reality, I on the contrary present the reality as it is, it comes in much contrast with what you hypocriticaly characterize everyone that disagrees with you to be, such as mentally deficient

  • @RockOnHellas Wrong again. There is ZERO physical Forensic evidence that Paul is dead. Photos are unreliable for measurements. Bones shift, the body changes, Ears, nose and feet grow the rest of your life. You and your silly web sites have zero genuine SCIENCE behind them. Furthermore you don't believe this nonsense yourself or you wouldn't pursue it. After all the wrong people might see it and then you'd disappear but you have no grasp on reality, musical history or common sense.

  • @maripocita37 "bones shift", well Ill be glad to inform you that bones don't shift from one year to another especially in adulthood, if you have something new to add to science please add it, your face cant go from round to oblong you know. musical history i have much grasp as you can see from my channel, you know, I have to inform you again that talent and success isnt restricted to paul or the beatles, phil ackrill is a well known musician+imitator, you can search everywhere.

  • @RockOnHellas Unreal. You're such a narrow minded thoughtless hypocrite who does not have English mastered.Yet anyone who disagrees with you is suddenly the close minded one and you're superior? What a joke. Look at the videos, photos. They're the same. Plastic surgery can't do that. Period. Do you even play an instrument? How about the 27 PM plays -- many at the pro level? His bass playing was revolutionary as was his writing. You're either a nutcase, a troll or an idiot.

  • @maripocita37 You either refuse to yourself to cope with reality, or you really believe what you say - I don't know what is worse. Let's forget who I am and who you are, and say you were presented by an anonymous individual forensic evidence ( and not only). No matter into what detail someone would go there is no chance that he will avoid you cursing him and labelling him and whatever he presents as insane. I have yet to see any disproval based on pure logic.

  • @maripocita37 Try to find yourselves any video from back then ( one pre-1967 and one post 1966) and try to capture a moment where all the beatles stand side by side. Such comparisons have been made by others, you can search in google with related terms and see the very real photos for yourself where no way to alter them exists. And fuck your english lang, you know whole world is not england. Paul from the shortest or 2nd shortest Beatle became by far the taller, what to say...

  • Whoever disagrees with you must necessarily be a troll an idiot and a nutcase, and not only with you but with the likes of you, I never disrespected anyone with different opinion if he can defy what I say logically and with insults, yet PIAers do it all the time. Well sorry to inform you, I lead a normal decent life with everything that follows that, but I much refuse to be sold bullshit by the media on a regular basis. You can daydream as far as you are secure, whatever ur choice

  • @maripocita37 Yes what you title revolutionary has many aspects to it. It does not negate immediately that another individual is technically capable to reproduce past songs or that himself is not innovative in various way. Phil Ackrill is a much existant person, that beyond any doubt you can find full detailed accounts on his life, such as his musical career and career at the same time as an imitator of various then well-known artists. They are NOT the same, here it compares a younger faul

  • @maripocita37 For a start google Phil Ackrill, please explain to me why there is no article of him, and where is an account of his actions after 1966 in the whole net??? He did belong to a band that had connections to the beatles etc, and yet all of a suddenly even references to them. not even a blank wiki article exists for him and his band, yet they are very much real, you can find movies of him, what else is there to add to convince somebody, that he is the now Paul we see.

  • @maripocita37 photos are reliable from measurements, if in one year to another the analogies are completely different. these specialists havent occupied themselves as you see only with paul but with a other important figures in italy, I can search my bookmarks and provide another link, you can look them up if you like. they took as a reference point the distance between the ears and no single feature after this has the right analogy to it. I dont see why ears from attached became unattached

  • Gabriella Carlesi has been a consultant for identification of people via digital image processing for various investigations, including:

    • The identification of Sergei Antonov in the scenario of the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II, in relation to the "Mitrokhin Archive" (for an Italian Parliament Commission),

    • The identification of Francesco Narducci, connected to the investigation of the so called "Monster of Florence,"

  • • The identification of Francesco Narducci, connected to the investigation of the so called "Monster of Florence,"

    • The murder of journalist Ilaria Alpi and her camera operator Miran Hrovatin (for an Italian Parliament Commission),

    • The assassination of Benito Mussolini and his mistress Claretta Petacci (for a historical reconstruction).

  • @maripocita37

    I really doubt if you YET saw any forensic evidence you didnt bother to google it and click the first link, to me everything they say is much obvious just with picture comparions and not forensic evidence, yet if they take an imitator, make an existant name FOR FIRST TIME IN HISTORY dissapear from wiki, when you can find many non-important persons, but in that case we have an individual having appeared as an imitator in many films with the name Phil Ackrill, where is wiki article

  • You are equally ludicrous as those that examine if 9/11 is inside or outside job, you cant see a whole lifetime that society is run more or less by itself, no conspiracy needed. Yet society destroys itself and that is unavoidable, you refuse to see aswell PRACTICAL and REALISTIC approaches on why an intelligence service would replace almost a whole band, testing on how to make the world EVEN worse through various tactics. Not you or anyone else, can provide counterarguments especially FORENSIC

  • PIA arguments

    1) It's a conspiracy theory: THEORY is by definiton UNproved not DISproved

    2) Talent: the beatles could very well write songs behind the scenes or the talent you are speaking of does not negate negative actions on the part of the impersonators, they may be not the ones writing the songs or they may possess themselves musical talent because they were not randomly picked as trained imposters at least a part of them, is suspected. Also their talent may well be overestimated.

  • 3)I don't see what technology not existant back then wouldn't allow plastic surgery ( and that combined with makeup) and imitators that were well known ( dissapeared only from wiki, and that alone says alot) - like Phil Ackrill for example which is an existant person that you can fully search for by yourself.

    4) That possibly somewhat would have noticed, YES MANY KNOW SO WHAT FOLLOWS THEN, also who told you there havent been detailed and intricated accounts of what happened.

  • PID arguments:

    1) All randomly in 1966 the beatles stoped playing lives.

    2) Sgt Pepper is an album cover depicting a funeral, the flowers below the words "Beatles" from a "P" from Paul.

    3) They placed side to side former and now beatles in that cover, and people didnt notice the most simple thing ( which is much real, and not only in that depiction)  that THE VERY HEIGHT of these individuals and the analogies of each ones height to another are absolutely different.

  • 4) The non-mourning Paul in that cover, also is the only one to hold the black instrument.

    5) The mirrored Sgt Pepper logo says "I ONE IX HE DIE.""

    6) The bare-footed zombie Paul in Abbey road - the clues were placed BY THEM, its not an incorrect interpretation but a clear cut meaning to all healthy minded individuals, be it real or not until you examine it further.

  • 7) A social experiment to see at what heights the LSD agenda could be pushed, paul had a different stance on crowd manipulation to that point, and a different stance. Also a social experiment to see if people would notice that they replaced a whole band.

    8) Faul on 1967-1968 admitted on an interview using LSD and an upheaval came with LSD usage rising even more than before, also the perceptions over drugs and generally such social matters was influenced nevertheless aswell,

  • not to mention ofc distraction of more serious matter such as the Vietnam war at that decade.

    9)In 1963 the Sandoz patents expired on LSD.[70] Also in 1963, the US Food and Drug Administration classified LSD as an Investigational New Drug, which meant new restrictions on medical and scientific use.[70] Several figures, including Aldous Huxley, Timothy Leary, and Al Hubbard, began to advocate the consumption of LSD. LSD became central to the counterculture of the 1960s.[87]" - wiki

  • 10) Search who Timothy Leary is and what is the role of the Tavistock Institute ( british intelligence) on the possible assasination and displacement with trained imposters of almost all the beatles, most certainly Paul and Lennon.

    11) "Your faces are so uncanny, you could be the originals" "We are the originals" "No,no you could impersonate them and lead the rebellion" - yellow submarine film 1968.

  • 12) In the same film a car crash takes place and they search for Paul that comes out a room untouched

    13) All the film looks like being made under the influence of LSD and promotes it. Also seemingly promotes themes ( silly to me) of Illuminati etc, nevetheless they do so undoubtedly, especially with the Pyramid and what is it's role in the film, also they whole theme of the film looks like the ridiculous concept ( but you dont know how it will be used nevertheless) of NWO saviours.

  • 14) Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds (LSD) describes more or less what happens when you drop, also very well depicted in the Yellow Submarine film 1968.

    15) Who are the imitators has very well been suggested and reasoned, I dont need to go further at that point, you can search it.

    16) Suddenly 3/4 beatles are barely reminiscent of what they were in 1966 after one years, yea ok...

    17) FORENSIC EVIDENCE - search: plastic-macca forensic-science-proves-paul-w­as.html

  • 18) In the 2000s Faul did plastic surgery to be reminiscent more of the original Paul....

    19) Ringo: "I am the last remaining Beatle."

    20) Jane Asher's has indirectly admitted it - too bored to find it right now.

    21) infinite more, such as an assasination of an individual INSIDE the industry that was about to publish a book etc cant be bothered right now

  • Also when you turn the Magical Mystery Tour album upside down there is a phone number to a morgue in nLondon. Another clue. The whole album is about Pauls death and there are so many clues in the pictures. John Lennon got beat up so then they released The White album so he wouldnt get punished for any clues. Although the picture booklet is full of clues including a half picture of Faul before Plastic surgery. Buy white album and look at the booklet, it shows you paul is dead.

  • @childintime12 that is not the phone number of a morgue in London you dickhead its been proved that its not....the phone number was not real

  • @childintime12 ... you are in the right path :o) ... Everything had a purpose back then... "Faul" - McCartney (a.k.a. Willy Campbell) -as John used to call him at the beginning- ihmo, make a deal and sold her soul in exchange for fortune and success...

  • Faul would sing Ive got a feeling, why dont we do it in the road, oh darling, sgt peppers, Rocky racoon, Get Back Birthday, helter skelter etc, and Vaul who sings mostly on revolver and rubber soul and also songs like I will, some on sgt peppers, and blackbird and fool on the hill. I thought this until the two italian researches found out he broke his jaw and replaced it a certain way and it changed his voice. Thats why he became worse on WHite album and had a fake beard on Let it be to hide it

  • @childintime12 so you think Mccartney is dead because he sounds different from what he does on the album Please Please Me....Mccartney sounds different on later albums because they are ground breaking albums helter skelter is a ground breaking song and it influenced many musicians. Paul Mccartney is NOT dead Paul Mccartney is a genius who kept changing music history with every song that he produced and sung he help the Beatles to progress forward with differfent sounds for the albums

  • @trueblue374 I am not saying it is bad music or it isnt influencing others I am simply saying his voice isnt good. He influenced a bunch of people to sing terrible becuz he is in fact a bad singer. Obviously since Paul died there was a huge cover up. They could bury him anywhere in the world with a different name. John says strawberry fields because its a graveyar that doesnt mean thats where hes buried. Hes putting clues in music to help you idiots understand. Well I understand John Lennon

  • @childintime12 you don`t understand John Lennon because John Lennon was taking the piss out of the rumours. You know absolutely nothing about anything...you say there was a huge cover up well tell me the conditions of this cover up tell me what John George and Ringo were told to do come on give me a list of the things they had to do to cover up Paul Mccartneys death what was said to John george and Ringo....you`re making shit up as you go along

  • I`VE JUST HEARD THAT THE PID ASYLUM HAS ANNOUNCED IT WILL BE TRACKING PIDERS DOWN BECAUSE THEY ARE A DANGER TO SOCIETY....CHILDINTIME 12 I`D WATCH IT IF I WAS YOU.....YOU`RE FIRST ON THE LIST TO GO TO THE NUT HOUSE

  • @trueblue374 I guess they will havfe to kill me and I will be a matryr like John Lennon and Jesus. Ill be in the same boat as them cool. They are prolly being paid by faul so he can maintain his credibility. Im not billy but thanks for proving that other people who dont talk have figured out the same things The Beatles are saying to us all.

  • @childintime12 This is the kind of crap come out with because you heard the conspiracy nut cases saying it Paul Mccartney is buried in Strawberry Fields.I`m from Liverpool and there is no documentation of this. I think by now everyone in Liverpool would know Mccartney was buried in Strawberry Fields or do you think we Liverpool people are part of the conspiracy too and we`ve been told to cover up Paul Mccartneys death.....YOU COME OUT WITH SOME BULLSHIT!!!!!!!

  • IMO- This video debunks itself--How can someone look almost exactly like they did 20 years ago--without having had plastic surgery, at some point???

    Paul- said in an interview in the late 80's concerning "Vanity," that he did not and would not go under the knife---But, did he?

  • This video has debunked the Paul is dead rumour it is not fake like the PID vidoes on youtube...this video is real and proves Paul Mccartney never died and was never replaced despite what consprieacy theorists think. Even though clues appear in Beatles songs and Beatles album covers Paul is stilll alive...the clues where put the by the Beatles to skit at the Paul is dead rumour

  • This video is not fake its shows the REAL PAUL MCCARTNEY HE DIDN`T DIE AND WAS NEVER REPLACED. Paul is being inteviewed in a coloured clip and in a black and whit clip in the square...the black and white clip is from Ready Steady Go Dusty Springfield was interviewing him its from 4th October 1963 the coloured clip is from Granada Reports in th 1980`s Granda Reports has its headquarters in the Albert Dock Liverpool the interview with Paul is not fake I should know I`m from LIverpool.

  • Not to be a dick, but Ears are the tell. They are absolutely the same in composition. Look at the thin edges with the same crinkle, the same dimesnsions of the ear lobes and curvature. That is the most definite example of human consistency. Ears may get bigger with age, but the shape does not defer.

    I wish Paul was dead, just for the fun of it. I am trying to find it to be real, but not in this arena, sorry. Thanks for the cool footage :)

  • @URockPhil Its called plastic surgery and this video was made on bias. They made him look like paul but his skull is shaped differently. Are you even looking at the two? He died look up clues and also look up the study completed that proved he died. Also look at photo in Magical mystery toru booklet and you will see Faul.

  • @childintime12 I`M CONVINCED NOW THAT YOU REALLY ARE A RETARD IN A WHEELCHAIR BECAUSE ONLY A WHEELCHAIR BOUND DICKHEAD WOULD COME OUT WITH A COMMENT LIKE THAT...YOU THINK THE PERSON IN THE COLOURED CLIP IN THIS VIDEO HAS HAD PLASTIC SURGERY TO LOOK LIKE THE PERSON IN THE BLACK AND WHITE CLIP IN THE SQAURE.......YOU ARFE WHEELCHAIR BOUND I BET YOU DON`T TYPE WITH YOUR HANDS BECAUSE THEY ARE DEFORMED

  • @howne44 its not hoax. You are the idiot. Get your facts then prove to me he didnt die.

  • Thanks for showing me more proof that he did die. This video shows he looks different. Listen to Help album then listen to helter skelter and why dont we do it in the road. Same voice? You people are clowns for believing hes not dead.

  • LMFAO. There actually EXIST rumors that he died. Wow.

  • yeah comparing fake Paul to fake Paul...of course you will not see any difference.

    besides he had surgery to look more like the real Paul and took several years to heal and practice before coming out and pretending to be the real Paul.

    Why won't he take a DNA test?

  • @GManGT why should Paul Mccartney take a DNA test to prove he is the real Paul Mccartney he`s done nothing wrong so why should he take a DNA test that is the most ridiculous thinking I have ever come across. This is a hoax that was started by some lunatic and it is wrong that Paul should be forced into having a DNA test just to prove he didn`t die he is not in the wrong the person who started the hoax is. Also you talk about plastic surgery WHAT FUCKING PLANET ARE YOU ON

  • @trueblue374 Are you calling John Lennon a lunatic? becuz he put the clues out there for us to figure out and 50 years later nobody has done it except me. Haha you idiots.

  • @childintime12 WHAT DO YOU MEAN 50 YEARS LATER WRONG AGAIN THE PAUL IS DEAD RUMOUR FIRST CAME TO LIGHT IN 1969 42 YEARS AGO AND DURING THOSE LAST 42  YEARS MANY PEOPLE HAVE TALKED ABOUT THE CLUE SO YOU`RE NOT THE FIRST YOU FUCKING RETARDED CUNT YOU ARE IN A WHEELCHAIR

  • @GManGT Thank you finally someone who makes sense on here. All these people do is attack me cuz there afraid of being wrong. Paul died I have tons of evidence. They never have evidence just denying words.

  • Looks like we will never know...only those involved. Yet, evidence presented is substantial...Why was he not at induction of Rock N Roll hall of Fame??? That was like the biggest honor?? Fans would have understood.

  • @mamaveros "we'll never know???? We DO know. The more you believe this, the more batshit crazy you are.So if you "don't know" you're only a little batshit crazy. Which is more than I can say for some...

  • Could be that Faul has had extensive plastic surgery to look more like Paul....However, if one has Brown eyes, and the other Green??? If True---game over...PID???....66/67.

  • @billy38010 I think he died in 1965. On rubber soul it doesnt sound like Paul. Yes he has green eyes and yes Faul is a terrible singer and he also says there are two paul mccartneys all the time. 90% of people have amnesia and are ignorant/defiant.

  • @childintime12 YOU ARE SO DEFORMED AND RETARDED YOU DON`T REALISE THAT WHEN RECORDING IN A RECORDING STUDIO DIFFERENT CONDITIONS IN THE RECORDING STUDIO LIKE ECHO EFFECTS BASS EFECTS ETC CAN MAKE THE VOICE SOUND DIFFERENT.....JOHN LENNON DOESN`T SOUND THE SAME ON SOME OF THE SONGS BECAUSE OF THE CONDITIONS OF THE RECORDING STUDIOS YOU WHEELCHAIR BOUND DICKHEAD

  • @childintime12

    About the eye color of Paul--0:09 sec. into the "Paul is dead-Rotten apple" series 24, a comparison shows a freeze frame of "Hey Jude" (I believe) and an earlier picture of Paul--Paul has "Hazle" eyes in the video, but in the mid 60's photo Paul has "Dark Brown" eyes. In a "Brown Eyed Handsome Man," video montage of Paul there is a #2 color card--which states that Paul has Dark Brown Hair and "Brown" eyes---Yet, in latent Photo's of Sir Paul he seems to have--"Green Eyes."

  • @billy38010 so you know that paul died too? Besides the eyes there is so much other proof out there like The Beatles lyrics, their album cover and picture clues (hand over pauls head always! etc.) Also his voice changed a lot in a 2 or 3 year period which shows he died and there is no other conclusion.

  • Comment removed

  • @childintime12--Yes I agree, i"ve studied much of the evidence given on You Tube, and I'm currently looking into the time frame that would allow for the staggering differences betwen "66" Paul and "67" Paul. To me, this is the period where "Paul" really changes the most. It can't all be coincidental--even his cherished "63" Hofner bass has changed during the same 66/67 time period, i.e. it's introduction via the "Penny Lane" video.

  • @billy38010 I first hear a change on Drive My car and Rubber Soul. Paul or faul only sings on 4 out of 14 songs on that album. I also think their are clues and that they used old Photos in the Rubber soul and revolver booklets. Maybe there were 2 Fauls 1 who only sings (You wont see me) and the other who they ease into the band. I hear 2 voices throughout their records until Abbey Road. For example on sgt pepers, Vaul (vocal Paul) When Im 64 and shes leaving and Faul who screams a lot on songs

  • @billy38010 What Im saying is the replacement did sound sort of like Paul but when he had his jaw broken and wired shut it made him look more like mccartney but it changed his voice forever. Thats why he screams towards the end and cant sing at all in his solo career.

  • @childintime12 --Problem---"Rubber Soul" was released in Dec. of 1965, with "Day Tripper" (A promo-film was made) as the single. Then, "The Beatles" took 3 months off in early "66." Later, In Aug, 1966, the "Beatles" last known live performance (S.F.), and the last known film of the Beatles with Paul was Aug. 1966, also, their last interview together as The Beatles was in 1966. The time problem with Paul being dead in 1965 is that he had been seen in public as Paul, after that???

  • @billy38010 Yes I understand but watch Paul live in 1964 singing Yesterday playing Acoustic Guitar. In 1966 live he is playing Yesterday with a bass and is singing badly. Also they cut one of the concerts short. Also watch Shes a Woman pre 1965 and watch it live in 1966. I also hear clues on Rubber Soul and "Paul" only sings 4 out of 14 songs on album. haha its all crazy and we dont know exactly what happened but Paul did die.

  • Comment removed

  • @childintime12--"Yesterday"---­was an original song recorded for the album "Help," reorded, in june 1965.

    "She's a Woman" was recorded in Oct. 1964. IMO--Paul sonds the same?

    IYO--Are you saying Paul was killed between "Help" and "Rubber Soul," 1965??

  • @billy38010 I know Yesterday and shes a woman is by the real Paul but Im saying when those songs are played live in 1966 it doesnt sound right. I am saying he died before Rubber Soul. The clues in songs makeit sound like thats when it happened. Nowehere Man , Think For Yourself, Im Looking Through You, We can work it out (George and John talking about keeping the band together) Plus Rubber Soul starts talking about death when everything before was just love songs for example In My Life

  • @childintime12 If you think the man can't sing you haven't heard Little Lamb Dragonfly.

  • This picture is up against a post 67 pic of course it's the same guy.

    Paul died November 66!

  • um, if you look at the other beatles you can see the same thing. People change, you know, age

  • People are so weird just look at the eyebrows you can clearly see its the same

  • what's name the song???

  • @patrii9100 "And I Love Her" :)

  • I can`t believe people are still saying Paul is dead after watching this video you must be mentally retarded if you think the coloured clip and the black and white clip in the square show two different people. 

  • no matter, it is still beautiful♥ well i think so!!!

  • what song is it playing on the background ??

  • @MERIK001 The song is called And I Lover Her

  • @trueblue374 thanx

  • ok first off, the end is creepy when john is singing and it trails off on "...will never die..." but anyway i don't get how you people are arguing about his eye color. i can't see his eye color, and if it matters, one clip is in color BUT THE OTHER IS IN BLACK AND WHITE. they won't have the same eye color IF ONE IS IN COLOR AND THE OTHER IS IN BLACK AND WHITE

  • He didnt have green eyes in hay Jude they were light brown . I think he is dead , heather killed him ;)

  • someone should invent a website called PIDersidiots,com