Added: 2 years ago
From: PokerFreerolls
Views: 90,591
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (92)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Bluff: Yes.

    Crazy: No.

  • jackson should have pushed all in instead of min raising on his 4 bet, then ivey cant call...

  • @mknocanada Agree with you

  • UNFUCKINGBELIEVABLE!! now that's POKER!!!

  • its a million chip points... not a million dollar...

  • i wonder if he got a read on jackson when he asked him how much he had left

    im sure he did

  • its not MILLION DOLLAR its MILLION CHIPS

  • Ivey's the man.

  • LOOK THE POT AT 1:53 !!!!!!!!! wtf ]:|

  • he spotted the weakness in the answer for the amount of chips

  • wow

  • it's not really 1 million dollars... its chips it's a tournament...

  • @HASHlRAMA exactly... it's a million chip pot, not a million dollars pot

  • Phil is such an aggressive player. What a legend!

  • a game of luck.....

  • "I dont see how he can possibly continue with this hand" - "all in"

  • Rigged! Rigged! Rigged!...I lost quads to higher quads twice last month on fulltilt! Been playing webcam poker on pokerview and let me tell you guys it’s the real thing!

  • @johnsmith7490 whats with all the pokerview advertisers leaving comments on youtube videos?!?!?! leave us alone!!!! your software sucks. i want to play poker in my underwear whenever i want without 8 other people staring at me.

  • after the flop it's 75% to 22%

  • @wedgwoodbandgroup 3% split pot

  • "We are watching some poker here barry" Really? i thought this was a rugby game. Thanks for clearing that up

  • The number of the devil 1:51 to 2:21, sorry that was an easy one.

  • hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaahaha

    the man in the background who claps is tha be$t,

    bad acted by jackson, ivey great performance...

  • and look at this! re-raise by Jackson wooooooooow..:::::

  • pretty cool

  • "WE ARE WATCHING SOME POKER HERE BERRY"

  • I have a 500-character max on this message, so I can't even point out 10% of what's wrong with these garbage announcers. I'll pay $10,000 for each of their heads, no questions asked.

  • @420Kasper420 I will get those heads, you get me the money

  • Phinl ivey the kind of player he is i would not be surprize to know if he knew queen high was best best so ya all u mother fuker who think jackson should have gone all in then he would have lost everything simple

  • @iioal I'm not saying that's what he should have done, but in this case the all in was the only play that might have gotten Phil off his hand.

  • i was holding my breath for the whole time. thats why this game is so crazy and can get up to ridiculous amounts of chips - the BLUFF

  • wow Jazblogshow, you really are stupid

  • Apparently Ivey stared at Jackson for 7 minutes before he went all in but they cut it out for TV.

  • lol phil ivey cant be bluffing if he has best hand lolol

  • @sneak108 but he didn't know he has the best hand... he had nothing... even if Jackson had pocket 2's he had a better hand at that moment... so he was bluffing...

  • wtf jackson had position... he so should have gone all in... bad play by him. u gotta think, either phil has the J and calls me or he doesnt... 50% 50% - also he should have known phil doesnt have the J cuz he prolly woulda checked when the flop came to pretend weakness.

  • @JazBlogShow lmfao 50/50

  • @JazBlogShow what are you on about... Jackson had a 5/6.. he had nothing, it's not 50/50... they both had nothing but Ivey had a Queen.. so if he went all in...Ivey had the much better chance at winning.... you don't waste 380k on 5/6 when there's nothing on the table... plus Ivey had much more chips so had nothing to lose really... while Jackson would have been eliminated...

  • @fiddyxxx when you do a bluff it doesnt matter what the fuck you have, all that matters is that the other guy doesnt call duh... so what the fuck ARE YOU talkin about

  • You people gotta try out this texas holdem bot i found. It works on a number of different sites, and it is 100% free. Check it out at freepokerbotXnet (replace X with . ) !

  • Welcome to Ownage

    Enjoy your servitude

  • he is the best player of the world!!!wow he goes all-in with nothing only beacuse he tinks his opponent has nothing!!! wow

  • bluffing with nothing. lol

  • this is such a ridiculous donkey hand min raise min reraise min rererere......

  • @patatepowa As stupid as it sounds i only just noticed the min raises haha, i wonder if that gave a tell?..

  • [ ] phil ivey bluffed

  • obvious Q high value shove

  • best play is by stu ungar

    Ungar faced off against Mansour Matloubi in a series of $50,000 buy-in no limit hold'em heads-up freezeout events. On the final hand of the game, Matloubi tried to bluff Stuey all-in for $32,000 on the river with a board of 3-3-7-K-Q. Ungar, who held 10-9, thought for a few seconds and said to Matloubi, "You have 4-5 or 5-6 so I'm gonna call you with this" and flipped over his 10-high to win the pot and bust Matloubi, who in fact held exactly what Ungar said he did

  • @chungchungown u know ungar aint no shit, just a little drug head with photographic memory syndrom that got nothing on ivey.

  • Phil Ivey reads weakness in his opponents better than anybody.

  • Ivey is tooo much

  • "we are watching some poker here Barry"

    haha, that craked me up !

  • Geez...... we have so many "poker experts" commeting here.. LOL

  • Yup, Jackson made a mistake by re-raising the 2nd time and not going all in, thereby representing trying to conserve his remaining chips.

  • what a badass

  • jeez. all on the flop. lol.

  • i bluff like tht for breakfast

  • lololo reraise to leave yourself 360k third time

    should just shoved there fucking pussy

  • jackson should have gone all in on the second raise

  • @trenis Yeah if it was a $2.20 heads up game like you probably play...

  • @trenis with the hand he had? I see what you mean, to make Ivey fold but still it's not worth the chance. Ivey had much more chips, he could have easily matched Jacksons chips and still have more... you don't go all in after the second raise, shows he's nervous his first bluff got caught out, if you got a good hand you raise it slightly, or even check and wait for your opponent to raise, so you can get the maximum amount of chips without your opponent folding.... Jackon just misjudged Ivey...

  • @trenis Phil Ivey could've had the nuts, not worth the risk

  • @trenis thats what i said ages ago and nobody gave me thumbs up :( lol

  • @trenis go all in and walk into possible trips?, you sound like a typical internet player, this is real tournament poker my friend.

  • @trenis yeah and if hes wrong hes fked-- thats why all in bluffs are completely different-- u telling me u can read ivey

  • @trenis i know but tht need lot of guts

  • lol wow

  • Technically this is not a million dollar bluff its only a 400k bluff because if he gets 2nd he receives 600k if he gets 1st 1 million.

  • Ivey

  • lol, you cant reraise if someone BETS

  • lol, indeed, good notice

  • Or he raised the "check" or bet of zero to whatever he bet. nub. . .

  • why?

  • @foreverguga of course u can..u can even reraise an all in when u play heads up!!!

  • @foreverguga Yeah you can. You pay their bet then raise to whatever you'd like.

  • @DEUHDCEwh

    If someone bets, you can raise

    If someone raises, you can reraise

    You can't REraise a bet..

    I hate it when poker hosts use the wrong terminology as if it is a ten dollar game. Gabe Kaplan is one of the few who knows what he is talking about

  • @foreverguga no limit

  • @Zodion89 Guys the point foreverguga's tryin to make is that a BET is not the same as a RAISE. Ivey's initial bet was just that, a bet - when you raise the initial bet its not a REraise its just a raise. The commentator made a mistake when he said Jackson reraised Ivey's initial bet.

  • @MrOriginalstevo thx for the reply ^^

  • @foreverguga Lol. Yes you can?

  • @liamaxtonhall Guys the point foreverguga's tryin to make is that a BET is not the same as a RAISE. Ivey's initial bet was just that, a bet - when you raise the initial bet its not a REraise its just a raise. The commentator made a mistake when he said Jackson reraised Ivey's initial bet.

  • @foreverguga What are you on about?

  • @foreverguga most poker commentators are retarded...

  • @foreverguga its considered a raise if you bet first. the initial bet on the go around is zero, since no one is obliged to bet.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more